As artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities in software products increases, independent software vendors (ISVs) are investing in AI to capitalize on its transformative potential.1 However, ISVs face go-to-market challenges for their software products, such as market demand and adoption.2 To overcome these challenges and grow, ISVs must build strategic relationships with hyperscalers like AWS.3
AWS provides ISVs, software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers, and startups with AI and data services to build, integrate, and scale their AI offerings built on AWS. These services include Amazon Bedrock, Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, Amazon SageMaker, and Amazon Quick Suite. To support partners’ growth, AWS offers go-to-market programs that deliver financial incentives, expert engagement, recognition, and other benefits. These programs include AI, Agent, and Data and Analytics competencies and AWS AI Strategic Collaboration Agreements (SCAs).
AWS commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential business opportunity and return on investment (ROI) ISV partners may realize by building, marketing, and selling AI offerings built on AWS. The purpose of this study is to provide partners with a framework to evaluate the potential business opportunity associated with leveraging the go-to-market benefits available from AWS.
176%
Return on investment (ROI)
$3.4M
Net present value (NPV)
To better understand the revenue streams, investments, and risks associated with building, marketing, and selling AI offerings built on AWS, Forrester interviewed seven representatives of six existing ISVs that are AWS Software Partners with experience leveraging AWS’s AI and data services and related go-to-market programs. The revenues of these global ISVs range from less than $100 million to more than $1 billion with varying solution areas. The interviewees span alliance, sales and marketing, and technical roles.
To illustrate the financial impact and subsequent partner business opportunity for ISVs, Forrester aggregated the characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations and combined the results into a single composite partner organization, which is an ISV based in North America that builds SaaS with AI and data services on AWS. As it increases its collaboration and engagement with AWS, it obtains the AI, Agent, and Data and Analytics competencies in Year 2 and signs an AI Strategic Collaboration Agreement in Year 3.
Interviewees said AWS AI and data services and go-to-market programs enabled their ISVs to build, market, and sell more effectively, which drove incremental revenue and accelerated growth.
“We have an opportunity to reach AWS customers where they are by leveraging programs, funding, cosell, and the marketplace to accelerate and retain revenue.”
Vice president, security
Key Findings
Revenue opportunities. The composite partner organization captures the following revenue streams, which are representative of those experienced by interviewees’ organizations:
Net new gross profits of $1.1 million from comarketing with AWS. By comarketing with AWS, the composite partner drives net new pipeline and opportunities for its AI offerings built on AWS. It achieves this pipeline growth by leveraging the AWS brand, AWS’s comarketing programs, and marketing development funds (MDFs) to co-author blogs, co-brand content, host joint webinars, take part in AWS events, and more. Using AI and Data and Analytics AWS Competencies and an AWS AI Strategic Collaboration Agreement yields a 200% growth in opportunities in Year 2 and a 93% growth in opportunities in Year 3. Altogether, this yields net new revenue and gross profits with accelerated growth for the composite partner.
Net new gross profits of $3.2 million from coselling with AWS. In addition to comarketing, the composite partner also accelerates its growth by coselling its AI solutions. It integrates its CRM with AWS, shares opportunities, takes part in joint account planning, and engages AWS sellers leveraging AWS’s connections and customer trust. The composite partner also uses proof of concept (POC) and other funding to further augment and accelerate sales. This collaborative approach to selling and the other go-to-market benefits enable the composite partner to win up to 12% more deals, sell 20% larger deals, and close deals faster.
Net new gross profits of $1 million from transacting through AWS Marketplace. The composite partner drives incremental value by transacting its deals through AWS Marketplace, driven by buyer preference for Marketplace-based procurement.4 The composite partner benefits from 80% richer deal sizes, 6% more won deals, an accelerated sales cycle, and incremental pipeline contribution from self-service customers.5 This results in accelerated revenue and net new revenue and gross profits.
“AWS is phenomenal with the go-to-market [programs].”
Chief sales officer, data science
Key outcomes. Benefits that provide value for the composite partner organization but are not quantified for this study include:
AWS Competencies benefits. The composite partner achieves AI, Agent, and Data and Analytics Competencies that yield benefits including increased recognition and credibility, financial incentives, and access to AWS experts. This enables the composite partner to better build, market, and sell its AI solutions built on AWS AI and data services. After achieving these AWS Competencies, the composite partner realizes a 353% increase in gross profits in Year 2 due to the competencies’ incremental go-to-market benefits.
AWS Strategic Collaboration Agreements benefits. The composite partner signs an AI Strategic Collaboration Agreement with AWS that allows it to build, market, and sell funding over time to support the building and growth of its AI solutions built on AWS. The composite partner realizes a 225% increase in gross profits in Year 3 due to the agreement’s incremental go-to-market benefits.
Revenue growth from building on AWS AI and data services. The composite partner co-builds with AWS to develop unique solutions and capabilities, supporting innovation and revenue growth.
Cost savings from building on AWS AI and data services. The composite partner realizes cost savings by building with AWS AI and data services.
Faster and more-informed decision-making due to technical early access and insight. Because the composite partner has access and insight into AWS’s technical roadmap, it makes more-informed decisions faster and builds better software for its customers. It also benefits from sharing feedback and being able to shape the roadmap.
Improved go-to-market efforts. AWS supports the composite partner’s go-to-market efforts.
“AWS has been a great partner. AWS is a key driver of the broader AI [landscape]. … We have just scratched the surface as far as what we can do with the partnership.”
Director of product marketing, data platform
Flexibility. There are multiple scenarios in which the composite partner might build, market, and sell AI offerings built on AWS and later realize additional opportunities, including:
Scalability. The composite partner and its customers can scale by building on AWS’s AI and data services.
Services revenue growth. The composite partner can generate services revenue alongside its software offerings.
Investments. Beyond software development and operation costs, which are embedded in the gross margin calculations of each revenue stream, the composite partner organization also invests in:
Market. The composite partner designates 0.5 FTEs per year for comarketing activities and invests up to 2% of the incremental revenue driven by the partnership into comarketing expenditures. This investment supports the joint events, webinars, case studies, blog posts, and more to drive comarketing value and growth. Over three years, the composite partner pays $294,000 in market costs.
Sell. The composite partner designates 0.5 FTEs per year for coselling activities, appoints 0.25 FTEs per year for cosell enablement activities, and invests up to 5% of incremental partnership-driven revenue into coselling. It also uses partner seller enablement for AWS Marketplace. In total, sell activities cost the composite partner $797,000 over three years.
Partnership management and operations. The composite partner designates 0.5 FTEs per year for partnership management activities and 0.75 FTEs per year for partnership operations activities (e.g., transacting through AWS Marketplace). It also invests in a partner ecosystem management solution to further its growth. Over three years, these cost the composite partner $829,000.
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite partner organization experiences total present value (PV) gross profits of $5.3 million over three years versus investments of $1.9 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $3.4 million and an ROI of 176%.
“The value from the AWS partnership is boundless. … Partnering with AWS … allows us to scale our solutions efficiently and accelerate innovation.”
Vice president of sales, FinOps
Pro Forma Revenue And Margin Opportunity: Three-Year Analysis (USD)
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
PL1
Net new revenue from comarketing with AWS
A5
$200,000
$600,000
$1,200,000
PL2
Net new revenue from coselling with AWS
B9
$208,000
$1,165,840
$4,305,600
PL3
Net new revenue from transacting through AWS Marketplace
C9
$61,040
$360,136
$1,403,920
PL4
Total revenue
PL1+PL2+PL3
$469,040
$2,125,976
$6,909,520
PL5
Net new gross profits from comarketing with AWS
At
$144,000
$432,000
$864,000
PL6
Net new gross profits from coselling with AWS
Bt
$149,760
$839,405
$3,100,032
PL7
Net new gross profits from transacting through AWS Marketplace
Ct
$43,949
$259,298
$1,010,822
PL8
Total gross profit
PL5+PL6+PL7
$337,709
$1,530,703
$4,974,854
PL9
Total gross margin
PL8/PL4
72.00%
72.00%
72.00%
PL10
Market
Dt
$113,631
$101,390
$138,595
PL11
Sell
Et
$245,132
$269,599
$454,991
PL12
Partnership management and operations
Ft
$332,400
$332,400
$332,400
PL13
Total operating investments
PL10+PL11+PL12
$691,163
$703,389
$925,986
PL14
Operating profit
PL8-PL13
($353,454)
$827,314
$4,048,868
PL15
Operating margin
PL14/PL4
-75.36%
38.91%
58.60%
Key Statistics
176%
Return on investment (ROI)
72.00%
Gross margin
58.60%
Operating margin
18 months
Payback
Revenue Streams (Three-Year)
[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Net new gross profits from comarketing with AWS
Net new gross profits from coselling with AWS
Net new gross profits from transacting through AWS Marketplace
The AWS AI Partner Journey For ISVs
Drivers leading to the AWS AI and data services practice investment
Interviews
Role
Solution area
Region
Revenue
Vice president Technology partners head
Security
Global (HQ: North America)
$1B+
Global alliance director
Integration platform as a service
Global (HQ: North America)
$100M to $1B
Global lead of cloud alliances
Revenue orchestration platform
Global (HQ: North America)
$100M to $1B
Chief sales officer
Data science
Global (HQ: North America)
$100M to $1B
Director of product marketing
Data platform
Global (HQ: North America)
$10M to $100M
Vice president of sales
FinOps
Global (HQ: North America)
$10M to $100M
Partner Goals, Challenges, And Drivers
Partners were diverse in size, backgrounds, solution areas, partnership maturity, and degrees of engagement with AWS. They partnered with AWS for AI and data services for a myriad of reasons, including:
Customer demand and a need for growth. Customer needs and expectations drove partners’ strategies and actions. Interviewees said their organizations needed to support preferred cloud providers and how their customers want to transact, reach enterprise customers, and grow their customer bases. This led to a need for a partner. The chief sales officer for a data science solution explained the customer demand: “The AWS partnership was customer-driven. We saw [AWS] as the dominant cloud provider in our customers’ environments and where we saw the most customer pull and demand.” Regarding procurement, the global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said: “AWS Marketplace is where customers are consolidating their procurement. We need to meet the customers where they are.”
Technology needs. Interviewees noted a need for their organization to use the right technology to build their products and support their customers. The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “We want to partner with companies like AWS and the data [services] our customers use to build the best-in-class [capabilities] for data science development in an open, integrated way so that we can support whatever data [needs] our customers have.” They added: “We want to partner with the bigger organizations that are driving the narrative around data modernization. We can mutually benefit by providing integrations that solve our customers’ problems and drive more of [their] workload consumption onto AWS. It is a win-win.”
Trust. Interviewees said that trust — particularly for AI and data — is critical and that it was a factor in their partnership decisions. Cultivating trust among partners is necessary to win business, sustain long-term relationships, and build a strong brand. Trust can be transferred between stakeholder organizations to drive higher engagement, loyalty, and advocacy.6 The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “In this new age of AI, there are companies that we have decided we do not feel confident partnering with. Reputation is more measurable than ever right now. We hold ourselves to a high ethical standard.”
Selecting The Right Partner Program
In choosing a partner and AI and data services around which to build their organizations’ software, interviewees emphasized the importance of the following factors:
Meeting customer demand for AWS and accessing prospects. Many interviewees said their organization’s customers are also AWS customers looking to transact through AWS Marketplace. The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said, “There was customer demand to start working with AWS from a transaction perspective via the marketplace.”
Interviewees also said they believed AWS’s scale would open the door for new customer growth, including growth with larger customers. The vice president for a security solution said, “[AWS] is the cloud with the largest customer base and the access to those customers.” The director of product marketing for a data platform added: “AWS is so prevalent. Everybody has at least a piece of their data ecosystem in AWS.”
AWS technology. Interviewees explained that their organizations took a technical perspective when choosing to deepen their partnerships with AWS and considered their product needs but also the needs of their customers. From a product perspective, they said this includes AWS’s ability to support AI scale and growth. The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said: “AWS has cloud infrastructure that can support our scaling. It is the industry leader, and our company has always had the mindset that we are going to use the best product. That is why we went with AWS.” In regard to AI, the technology partners head for a security solution mentioned Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that provides access to multiple foundation models for building and scaling genAI applications: “AWS is taking a good lead in AI with Bedrock. It was faster out of the gate.”
From a customer perspective, interviewees emphasized flexibility. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “We want to give our customers options, give them deployment options, and give them architecture options. We have found AWS to be the most flexible and cost-effective [service] to do that.” Similarly, the global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said: “Amazon Bedrock [is] embracing not being a walled garden, meaning you can bring your own model.”
Trust in AWS for AI and data. Interviewees explained that their organizations trust AWS for AI and data services, noting competence and integrity. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “It is the confidence in who AWS is as a company. If you are going to partner with an organization in the age of AI, morality matters. How you go about establishing guardrails, security, and more is super important. Does a company have a good reputation for being an honest, ethical organization? Reputational value matters more now than ever. We felt that AWS lined up best with our priorities.”
Alignment with AWS. Interviewees noted that other factors naturally aligned their organizations with AWS, including their preexisting relationships with AWS and shared visions for AI. The vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said, “Since its origin, our company has been partnering with AWS exclusively.” The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “We feel like AWS has the right executive support around where they are going with their vision. Our executives have aligned. The two CEOs have aligned shared visions and shared direction, and they have quickly moved into product development.”
From a technical perspective, the director of product marketing for a data platform said: “It is a triple benefit for AWS and the AWS customer to work with us because we clean up data and make it more secure and run our stack on AWS. That is double counting the increased consumption, and then we are unblocking AI, which is going to pour gasoline on the whole thing and crank up the consumption for everybody. Because we have that relationship with AWS, they are super strategic for us.”
AWS’s go-to-market programs. Interviewees said their organizations recognized the opportunity of going to market with AWS for their AI solutions and saw growth opportunities in deepening their relationships with AWS and increasing engagement via co-innovation, comarketing, and coselling. The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “The biggest differentiator — and it is stark — is the programs. We see tremendous benefit by having all these incentive and financial programs in the SCA around coselling, design wins, proof-of-concept funding, and joint marketing funding. AWS makes it easy to build a business with them and engage with their sales force.” Similarly, the vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said: “We fully believe in the cosell motion with AWS and the partner ecosystem they have created. We have seen the reciprocal benefits of going all in with AWS and continuing to do that by applying for additional competencies, continuing to sponsor new events, and being an extension of the AWS name and brand.”
“AWS has been a leader in thinking about how to build and go to market around cloud infrastructure. They have been extremely creative and have developed many programs and ways they can work with partners and customers to leverage AWS’s unique position in the market.”
Technology partners head, security
Composite Partner Organization
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite partner company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite partner organization is representative of the interviewees’ partner organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite partner organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization is an ISV based in North America with global operations. It’s an AWS partner and builds SaaS on AWS AI and data services. It goes to market through direct sales, coselling, and marketplaces.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization increases its engagement and collaboration with AWS year over year. It obtains the AI Competency and the Data and Analytics Competency in Year 2. It then obtains a Strategic Collaboration Agreement in Year 3.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
AI Competency
Data and Analytics Competency
Strategic Collaboration Agreement
Analysis Of Partner Revenue Streams
Quantified revenue data as applied to the composite partner
Revenue Streams And Gross Profits
Ref.
Benefit
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
At
Net new gross profits from comarketing with AWS
$144,000
$432,000
$864,000
$1,440,000
$1,137,070
Bt
Net new gross profits from coselling with AWS
$149,760
$839,405
$3,101,380
$4,090,545
$3,159,981
Ct
Net new gross profits from transacting through AWS Marketplace
$43,949
$259,298
$1,011,262
$1,314,509
$1,014,026
Total gross profits
$337,709
$1,530,703
$4,976,642
$6,845,054
$5,311,077
Net New Gross Profits From Comarketing With AWS
Evidence and data. Interviewees said comarketing with AWS drove net new pipelines and opportunities. Their organizations used AWS partner creative and messaging and took part in AWS’s comarketing programs leveraging MDF, which enabled them to engage in marketing activities (e.g., digital marketing, events, featured placement in AWS-led campaigns) they otherwise could not have. Interviewees said comarketing and revenue increased as their organizations gained one or more AWS Competencies and signed Strategic Collaboration Agreements.
Interviewees discussed the marketing activities their organizations were able to engage in because of the partnership. The director of product marketing for a data platform described how their organization is working with AWS and mentioned participating in AWS’s annual learning conference, AWS re:Inforce: “We have joint solution guides that are cobranded. We have done webinars together. We are releasing our first [co-authored] blog. We are running events with AWS guest speakers. We are looking at AWS re:Invent as well. … We did re:Inforce and received a lot of good leads.” The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “We are doing everything from marketing campaigns with AWS to events and case studies highlighting customer wins together. The CMO and marketing team have dug in heavily, and we have webinar events, physical events, and digital campaigns we are running with AWS. We have been using MDF to support those functions, and we have seen good conversion.”
Interviewees said their organizations benefit from using the AWS brand and messaging alongside their organization’s brand. The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said, “We are going to use AWS’s name, image, and likeness [for an event] and say we are built on AWS, and we are an enterprise solution.” Similarly, the vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said, “The AWS name, brand, and recognition goes a long way.”
Interviewees said comarketing with AWS yielded incremental net new opportunities for their organizations. The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said, “The ROI that we get on marketing spend is we get about 10 times the pipeline from what we get from MDF investment.” The vice president for a security solution explained, “[As my organization has increased AWS’s involvement with marketing,] it increased our pipeline influence with AWS over close to 150% year to date.” The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said, “The lead funnel is five to seven times where we were last year, commensurate with the number of events.”
Interviewees also noted how the comarketing benefits grew as they increased their engagement with AWS and their partnerships matured. The vice president of sales for a FinOps solution explained that obtaining new competencies enabled their organization to take part in innovative programs and unlock more MDF: “Joint marketing continues to increase year over year as we not only deepen our partnership, but as we unlock competencies and get brought into different programs. … You unlock additional MDF capabilities.” Similarly, the chief sales officer for a data science solution noted their organization’s comarketing activities increased since securing a Strategic Collaboration Agreement.
“One-third to half of our comarketing events this year are due to the AI Competency. These are partner forums, executive forums, an ‘AI women in tech’ event, side sessions at re:Invent, a customer dinner, and more.”
Global alliance director, integration platform as a service
“From a marketing standpoint, we are leveraging the AWS brand and platform to speak to AWS customers and communicate that we are the real deal in helping the biggest companies in the world protect their data and roll out AI.”
Director of product marketing, data platform
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite partner:
By comarketing its software with AWS, the composite partner has 10 net new opportunities in Year 1 that it otherwise would not have gained.
After the composite partner obtains the AI Competency and Data and Analytics Competency, the number of net new comarketing opportunities grows to 30 in Year 2 (200% growth).
After the composite partner obtains an AI Strategic Collaboration Agreement, the number of net new comarketing opportunities grows to 58 in Year 3 (93% growth).
When selling directly and not coselling, the composite partner has a 20% win rate and an average annual contract value (ACV) of $100,000.
The composite partner’s software gross margin is 72%.
93%
Growth in net new opportunities from comarketing with AWS in Year 3
Risks. This revenue stream may vary depending on the following:
Whether the organization comarkets with AWS.
The degree to which the organization comarkets with AWS.
The organization’s maturity and level of engagement with AWS.
Unique business and deal characteristics.
Results. Forrester calculated three-year total PV gross profits (discounted at 10%) of $1.1 million.
Net New Gross Profits From Comarketing With AWS
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
A1
Net new opportunities from comarketing with AWS
Composite
10
30
58
A2
Win rate (direct)
Composite
20%
20%
20%
A3
Net new opportunities won from comarketing with AWS
A1*A2
2
6
12
A4
Average contract value (direct)
Composite
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
A5
Subtotal: Net new revenue from comarketing with AWS
A3*A4
$200,000
$600,000
$1,200,000
A6
Software gross margin
Composite
72%
72%
72%
At
Net new gross profits from comarketing with AWS
A5*A6
$144,000
$432,000
$864,000
Three-year total: $1,440,000
Three-year present value: $1,137,070
Net New Gross Profits From Coselling With AWS
Evidence and data. Interviewees said coselling with AWS allowed their organizations to win more deals, close deals faster, and increase deal sizes. They explained that their organizations integrated their CRMs with AWS, automated opportunity sharing, engaged in joint account planning, and engaged AWS for deal support from start to finish. They also said their organizations increased sales due to collaborating with AWS sellers, customer trust in AWS, and leveraging customers’ AWS Private Pricing Agreements (PPAs). They also noted value in AWS funding.
Interviewees said their organizations received opportunities from AWS sellers. The director of product marketing for a data platform said: “AWS can identify opportunities that we can approach jointly or vice versa. … We receive tons of new opportunities and opportunity progressions.” The chief sales officer for a data science solution explained how this benefit grew as their organization’s AWS partnership matured: “The longer game is that through strategic engagement with AWS reps, they start bringing you into more opportunities. You go through phases of maturation as a partner.”
In terms of the impact of opportunities from AWS sellers, the global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “It is a small ratio but steadily growing. It hovers between 5% to 10% of the total.” The vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said, “It is 30% of pipeline from an origin perspective.”
Interviewees also discussed the incremental impact of coselling with AWS and leveraging AWS funding and programs regardless of the source. They said their organizations won more deals by approaching customers alongside AWS. The vice president for a security solution said: “We saw a 1.8 times increase in close rate when we were coselling with AWS. … We did a study recently looking at all stage four opportunities, and we did see a higher conversion rate of about 18% when we were coselling with AWS.”
The vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said their organization achieved a higher win rate on opportunities referred by AWS sellers: “Our win-loss ratio is higher because these leads tend to be warm. These deals have a 10% higher conversion rate.” The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “We see an accelerated conversion rate in opportunities that are cosold with AWS. It is a 10% to 15% higher conversion rate, and closer to 10%. That is driven by the fact that AWS will have influence in the account that we do not have.”
Interviewees noted that deals referred by AWS sellers are often larger than usual. For example, the vice president for a security solution said, “When we cosell with AWS, our deal sizes are 40% to 50% larger with longer term length.” The director of product marketing for a data platform said, “When we have AWS in the account with us, we close larger deals and close deals faster because we can address potential deal risks together and proactively.”
Interviewees also shared specific examples of how coselling with AWS yielded incremental value. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “A $132,000 deal was dead because a privacy, and the customer’s security team told us we could not proceed. Our sellers would have had no idea how to get through a block like that. AWS connected the privacy and security team with an AWS compliance specialist and unblocked the deal that would have been lost.” They added: “A second example was a $100,000 enterprise deal. AWS was able to lock $550,000 through the [customer’s] committed spend with AWS to support the purchase. The deal jumped to $550,000.”
Joint account planning and increased engagement augmented the impact of coselling together. Interviewees’ organizations connected their CRM systems with AWS to share opportunities and help with planning. The director of product marketing for a data platform said: “Strategic account planning has been helpful for us. We have been successful looking at where we have joint customers and how we are looking to grow with them in aligning our solutions to their business priorities.”
Interviewees also consistently noted that increased engagement and partnership maturity led to greater coselling outcomes such as increasing funding from obtaining competencies and securing Strategic Collaboration Agreements. The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “[Funding from AWS] allows us to take that cost off of customers’ plates and allows them to do a proof of concept effectively on our dime, and we see win rates increase because of that. We have just started doing these because of the SCA.”
“We have a more than two times higher win rate with proof of concepts, but the problem with POCs is always capital costs. AWS alleviates that pain where we can offset costs to run POCs, which will drive two times higher win rates.”
Global leader of cloud alliances, revenue orchestration platform
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite partner:
In Year 1, the composite partner has 40 opportunities that it could cosell with AWS. This increases to 118 opportunities in Year 2 and to 230 opportunities in Year 3.
In Year 1, AWS sellers originate 10% of these opportunities. This increases to 15% in Year 2 and 20% in Year 3.
In Year 1, the percentage of cosell opportunities approached with AWS is 20% of the potential opportunities together in Year 1. This increases to 40% in Year 2, and 80% in Year 3.
In Year 1, the composite partner wins 10% more opportunities when coselling with AWS. As the composite gains experience collaborating with AWS, this increases to 11% in Year 2 and 12% in Year 3.
When coselling with AWS, the composite partner’s average contract value is 20% larger.
This revenue stream grows year over year as the partnership matures.
12%
Incremental win rate when coselling with AWS in Year 3
Risks. This revenue stream may vary depending on the following:
Whether the organization cosells with AWS.
How well the organization’s sellers and AWS sellers collaborate.
Unique deal and business characteristics.
“AWS is going to do what is right for the customer. That speaks to their commitment to their partners. We are in this together.”
Global alliance director, integration platform as a service
Results. Forrester calculated three-year total PV gross profits (discounted at 10%) of $3.2 million.
Net New Gross Profits From Coselling With AWS
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
B1
Opportunities
Composite
40
118
230
B2
Percentage of opportunities originated by AWS sellers
Interviews
10%
15%
20%
B3
Subtotal: Net new revenue from opportunities originated by AWS sellers
B1*B2*A2*A4
$80,000
$354,000
$920,000
B4
Percentage of opportunities approached with AWS
Composite
20%
40%
80%
B5
Incremental win rate when coselling with AWS
Interviews
10%
11%
12%
B6
Subtotal: Net new revenue from an increased win rate
B1*B4*B5*A4
$80,000
$519,200
$2,208,000
B7
Incremental ACV when coselling with AWS
Interviews
20%
20%
20%
B8
Subtotal: Net new revenue from increased ACV
B1*B4*(A2+B5)*(A4*B7)
$48,000
$292,640
$1,177,600
B9
Subtotal: Net new revenue from coselling with AWS
B3+B6+B8
$208,000
$1,165,840
$4,305,600
B10
Software gross margin
Composite
72%
72%
72%
Bt
Net new gross profits from coselling with AWS
B9*B10
$149,760
$839,405
$3,100,032
Three-year total: $4,089,197
Three-year present value: $3,158,969
Net New Gross Profits From Transacting Through AWS Marketplace
Evidence and data. Interviewees said AWS Marketplace drove incremental value for their organizations and their customers. They explained that their customers want to transact through AWS Marketplace. A previous Forrester Total Economic Impact study showed that with the AWS Marketplace, a composite organization saves 70% of the time needed for solution discovery and 60% of the time needed for procurement processes while reducing time to market by 30%.7 From an ISV perspective, interviewees explained that AWS Marketplace and associated programs and funding resulted in improved win rates, larger deals, faster sales cycles, and improved customer retention.
Interviewees said their customers wanted to transact through AWS Marketplace, which resulted in incremental impact. The vice president for a security solution said: “Our customers increasingly want AWS Marketplace. We are streamlining the procurement process by leveraging it. Our sales reps are interested in leading with AWS Marketplace as opposed to introducing it later in the sales cycle.” The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said, “Business and procurement love the idea of going through AWS Marketplace.”
Interviewees explained that deals closed faster and at a better rate with AWS Marketplace. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “We are in the last month of the quarter. Deals that were going to go direct are going to shift and go through AWS Marketplace at the last minute because the customer realizes they do not have to wait for legal approval or procurement reviews because they already signed that marketplace agreement and have standard terms they can fall back on. It happens every quarter.”
The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “In some cases, we see an accelerated sales cycle. One reason is influence. Another is that customers can transact on AWS Marketplace and potentially burn down committed spend with AWS. [If] we have a customer that is pushing back on budget or the deal is taking too long, we will engage AWS and find a way to tap into their broader engagement or financial structure with the account, and it will dramatically increase the speed and reduce friction to close. Contracting and budget are two of the biggest issues we run into.”
Interviewees also said the AWS Marketplace Private Offer Promotion Program (MPOPP) helped close deals faster. The vice president for a security solution said: “MPOPP is a marketplace-specific incentive that we leverage to get deals across the finish line closed faster.” The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said: “The beauty of MPOPP is that you can time-bound those. … It compels a customer to sign and close the deal. When we would offer MPOPP, it allowed us to get those deals to close in the quarter because the customer [would] lose those time-bound incentives.”
Interviewees noted that using AWS Marketplace also led to larger deals. The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “From a contracting perspective and a funding perspective — with the combined benefit of potentially accelerated sales cycles, less legal cycles, and access to more budget — we see the potential of 20% or more lift on deal size and speed to close.” Similarly, the global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said, “We see 40% larger deals when selling through AWS Marketplace versus direct.” The director of product marketing for a data platform said their organization increased deal sizes by 86% with AWS Marketplace.
According to the interviewees, AWS Marketplace had a positive impact on retention. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said, “We have 30% higher net revenue retention when we sell through AWS Marketplace versus direct.” They also noted longer deals: “Eighty-five percent of marketplace contracts are three-plus years compared to only 70% direct.” The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution noted a positive retention impact, saying: “When you close on the AWS Marketplace, the deal becomes part of AWS’s demand plan. … They have a renewals team. We have a 100% renewal rate. I have yet to void a license through the AWS Marketplace.”
“The AWS Marketplace is the cherry on top of an AWS partnership.”
Global lead of cloud alliances, revenue orchestration platform
“AWS Marketplace is a way to accelerate the fulfillment and closing of the deal.”
Chief sales officer, data science
6%
Incremental win rate when transacting through AWS Marketplace
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite partner:
The composite partner transacts 10% of deals through AWS Marketplace in Year 1. This increases to 20% of deals in Year 2 and 40% in Year 3.
Of these deals, 95% leverage private offers and 5% leverage self-service.
The composite partner wins 6% more opportunities when transacting through AWS Marketplace and the average contract value of those deals is 80% larger.8
Risks. This revenue stream may vary depending on the following:
Whether the organization transacts deals through AWS Marketplace.
The organization’s customers and their preferred procurement methods.
Unique business and deal characteristics.
Results. Forrester calculated three-year total PV gross profits (discounted at 10%) of $1.0 million.
Net New Gross Profits From Transacting Through AWS Marketplace
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
C1
Opportunities
Composite
40
118
230
C2
Percentage of opportunities transacted through AWS Marketplace
Composite
10%
20%
40%
C3
Percentage of customers leveraging AWS Marketplace via private offers
Composite
95%
95%
95%
C4
Percentage of customers leveraging AWS Marketplace via self-service
1-C3
5%
5%
5%
C5
Subtotal: Net new revenue from opportunities self-serviced via AWS Marketplace
C1*C2*C4*A4
$20,000
$118,000
$460,000
C6
Incremental win rate when transacting through AWS Marketplace
Forrester custom research
6%
6%
6%
C7
Incremental ACV when transacting through AWS Marketplace
Forrester custom research
80%
80%
80%
C8
Subtotal: Net new revenue from an increased win rate and increased ACV with AWS Marketplace
C1*C2*C3*C6*(A4*(1+C7))
$41,040
$242,136
$943,920
C9
Subtotal: Net new revenue from transacting through AWS Marketplace
C5+C8
$61,040
$360,136
$1,403,920
C10
Software gross margin
Composite
72%
72%
72%
Ct
Net new gross profits from transacting through AWS Marketplace
C9*C10
$43,949
$259,298
$1,010,822
Three-year total: $1,314,069
Three-year present value: $1,013,695
Unquantified Benefits
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their partner organizations experienced but could not quantify:
AWS Competencies benefits. Interviewees said earning AWS AI and Data and Analytics Competencies helped their organizations gain recognition, credibility, and funding, and they explained that it’s valuable having access to AWS experts for support as they build, market, and sell software built on AWS AI and data services. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “The AI Competency has been super helpful this year. … The [list of] benefits is long. We get invited to many more activities, including event participation and sponsorship opportunities. There have been 10 to 15 [in the last six months] just because of our AI Competency. It has been a healthy list of activities and experience from our brand getting upleveled into this new category. … We are going to have massive funding and branding opportunities.”
AWS Strategic Collaboration Agreements benefits. Interviewees agreed there’s value in having AI Strategic Collaboration Agreements with AWS. While the length and nature of these agreements varied, interviewees described how their organizations received build, market, and sell funding from AWS to support their software powered by AWS AI and data services. The technology partners head for a security solution said: “We have [an AI] Strategic Collaboration Agreement with AWS. We break it out into cobuild, comarket, and cosell. We are getting credits across all three of those vectors through the SCA.”
The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution explained the unique value of having a Strategic Collaboration Agreement with AWS: “The goal is for the ISV to build pipeline and to increase their speed in the market. If we win, they win because as we grow, [a part] of every dollar we bill goes to [AWS].” In summation, the global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said, “There is no shortage of opportunities to earn funding.”
Revenue growth from building on AWS AI and data services. Interviewees affirmed the value of building on AWS and innovating together and shared examples of how their organizations are uniquely driving value by building on AWS services like Bedrock, SageMaker, and Amazon Quick Suite.
The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution stated their organization closely collaborated with AWS to build a new AI governance solution: “We have deep and rich code development that we are doing with AWS Bedrock and [Amazon Quick Suite]. … Our CEO sat down with the CEO of AWS and shared a mutual vision for where AI is going and how our lineage in integration, automation, and data management could serve as the foundation for AI governance. Our engineers started doing workshops with AWS. [In five months,] we had a minimal viable product. [In eight months,] we launched [our product]. We have a first-mover advantage right now. It will take [other companies] years. What we are doing with AWS is not just marketing.”
Similarly, the global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform discussed how their organization is going to be able to co-build a new capability for Amazon Connect integration: “Cobuild is an important maturing step to partnering with AWS. We have customers that have organically integrated to Amazon Connect. This drives stickiness of our mutual services, and we are building out use cases, and we are going to join the Amazon Connect ready program to build an integration of those tools. We are going to build a net new unique capability. AWS cannot offer it and we cannot offer it, but we can offer it together. We will build this, market this, and sell this together.”
The same interviewee elaborated on the value of cobuilding and integrating with Amazon Quick Suite: “We want to build a service where users can stay in [our product] but reference enterprise data across the ecosystem. We cannot build that ourselves. AWS builds the foundational services to reference enterprise data and pulls that natively into our platform and vice versa. AWS builds premier services that ISVs can use. … When we cobuild together, we are creating a product that creates mutual consumption. That is where you get to the holy grail of working with AWS. … If we adopt Amazon Connect and Amazon Quick Suite, AWS sellers are going to have all the motivation in the world to work with us.”
Interviewees also discussed the value of building with Bedrock. The vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said: “Amazon Bedrock does a great job of taking an agnostic approach of bring-your-own-model. We have customers who use multiple different LLMs (large language models), including Amazon Nova. Being able to build on top of Bedrock has given us opportunities to help customers get visibility and into their LLM spend and usage, which is a totally new work stream that we have been able to support because of the emergence of AI and Bedrock.” The interviewee also noted that this has a positive impact on and added, “One out of three customers is asking us what level of visibility and allocation we can get to LLMs.”
The chief sales officer for a data science solution discussed the value of building with SageMaker and Bedrock and explained how it drives opportunity for their organization. They said: “We are doing a bunch in terms of integration with SageMaker and Amazon Bedrock. Our new product has multiple points of AI integration into it to make a data scientist more productive.” They elaborated that Bedrock is often IT-approved for customers in regulated industries and said that integrating with Bedrock will “help drive adoption in our existing base for this new product, which will make those customers bigger and stickier.” They also said they believe the integration will drive new customer acquisition.
The interviewee summarized the value their organization sees in cobuilding with AWS: “AWS wants you to run on the platform, and they give you benefits to drive the growth of your software. The true unlock comes when your software is this natural extension of their services and there is a better-together story because that really helps with cosell, product innovation, integration, and getting their sales team to include you in their pitch and vice versa. It makes everything easier.”
Cost savings from building on AWS AI and data services. Interviewees discussed cost savings from building on AWS. The vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said, “The more that you lean into the ecosystem and the series of tools that they have, you start to achieve economies of scales and the benefits of that.” The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “AWS is competitive. Running fully as a SaaS platform is where you unlock the bigger cost savings. We are working toward a commit contract.”
Faster and more-informed decision-making due to technical early access and insight. Interviewees said that having early access and insight into AWS’s technical roadmap is valuable as their organizations build and innovate and explained that it enabled their organizations to make more informed decisions faster and build better products. The organizations also have opportunities to share feedback to influence the roadmap. The technology partners head for a security solution said, “Getting early insight into what AWS is building and early insight into the services that it is providing is extremely helpful.”
Similarly, when asked about early access and insights, the vice president of sales for a FinOps solution said: “The value is tremendous. Being able to have that tight-knit, close partnership gives us early access to the roadmap of certain products and services to avoid pitfalls. It also helps us make sure that we are on the mark and being customer-obsessed with the problem statements that we hear to build the solutions that will result in a better experience for customers who use AWS.”
Improved go-to-market efforts. Interviewees explained that AWS provides their organizations with the necessary support to grow their businesses. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said, “AWS is by far the most partner-friendly organization I have ever worked with.” The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said, “There is no comparison to their level of rigor in helping work with their ISVs that are built on AWS.” Additionally, the chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “AWS partners well. It has been easy to work with them.”
“AWS understands that supporting our growth naturally means they are growing themselves. We are all in with AWS. If we grow, they grow. It is simple math.”
Global alliance director, integration platform as a service
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each partner. There are multiple scenarios in which an ISV partnered with AWS might later realize additional opportunities, including:
Scalability. Interviewees explained that building on AWS’s AI and data services presents opportunities for their organizations and their customers to agilely scale. From a partner perspective, the director of product marketing for a data platform said: “From the product side, a key source of value is that AWS has helped us to be agile and flexible. We can focus on delivering features and experiences that help solve our customers’ challenges without having to worry about the platform side of things. We know that we can scale up in a way that is profitable for us. That is a big part of the value.”
From a customer scalability perspective, the chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “We do see a big advantage. We have customers who run our software on-premises, and they do not really do it effectively. We have customers who get into trouble, and that gets in the way of unlocking potential. … We actively engage our on-premises customers and try to move them more to a scalable cloud environment. We are promoting AWS and the integrations with SageMaker and Bedrock.”
Services revenue growth. Interviewees said their organizations and their partners can sell more services (e.g., advisory, deployment, support) by going to market with AWS, which would result in a multiplier effect.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Analysis Of Partner Investments
Quantified investment data as applied to the composite partner
Total Investments
Ref.
Investment
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Dt
Market
$34,750
$78,881
$101,390
$138,620
$353,616
$294,382
Et
Sell
$100,180
$144,952
$269,599
$455,090
$969,722
$796,605
Ft
Partnership management and operations
$30,000
$302,400
$332,400
$332,400
$997,200
$829,357
Total investments
$164,930
$526,233
$703,389
$926,110
$2,320,538
$1,920,344
Market
Evidence and data. Interviewees said their organizations invested in comarketing their software with AWS. This included investing both designated and dedicated marketing labor and additional funds for comarketing activities. For example, the director of product marketing for a data platform said they and even staff focused 20% of their time on AWS. Similarly, the global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform said shared marketing resources spent 25% of their time on AWS comarketing.
On the other hand, some interviewees’ organizations dedicated full-time resources. The vice president for a security solution said, “There are four full-time partner marketing people dedicated to the to the partnership.” But regardless of the organization or its scale, interviewees said it was instrumental to dedicate resources to run events, organize webinars, build case studies, manage sponsorships, co-author blog posts, and more to drive comarketing value and growth.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite partner:
The composite partner initially designates 0.25 FTEs for comarketing. As the partnership grows, it designates 0.5 FTEs to this in Years 1 through 3.
The fully burdened salary for an FTE in a marketing role is $139,000.
The composite partner also invests in additional marketing expenditures. The amount starts at 2% of the partnership-influenced revenue and declines by 0.5% per year as revenue grows.
Risks. This cost may vary depending on the following:
Whether the organization comarkets with AWS.
The organization’s level of engagement and the degree to which it comarkets.
The roles engaged in this work.
How the organization comarkets.
Results. Forrester calculated three-year total PV investments (discounted at 10%) of $294,000.
Market
Ref.
Metric
Source
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
D1
Comarketing FTEs
Interviews
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.50
D2
Average fully burdened annual salary for a marketing role
Composite
$139,000
$139,000
$139,000
$139,000
D3
Net new revenue
Initial: A5Y1+B9Y1+C9Y1; Y1-Y3: A5+B9+C9
$469,040
$469,040
$2,125,976
$6,909,520
D4
Additional marketing expenditure as a percentage of partnership-influenced revenue
Composite
0.0%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
Dt
Market
(D1*D2)+(D3*D4)
$34,750
$78,881
$101,390
$138,595
Three-year total: $353,616
Three-year present value: $294,382
Sell
Evidence and data. Interviewees’ organizations incurred incremental costs to support coselling with AWS, including designated and dedicated coselling and sales enablement labor and time for training. The global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said, “We have a sales leader in APJ (Asia Pacific and Japan), Europe, and America.” The global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said, “We are going to hire a full-time resource to talk to AWS, talk to our sellers, and coordinate working together on accounts.”
Interviewees also emphasized the importance of training their sellers. The chief sales officer for a data science solution said: “We have done extensive training with our sales force on how to cosell with AWS, the marketplace, and the different sales motions. … It is 2 hours per person ongoing.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite partner:
In Years 1 to 3, the composite partner designates 0.5 FTEs annually to cosell activities and allocates enablement resources to support coselling, including seller training.
The fully burdened annual salary for a sales role is $243,000.
The fully burdened annual salary for a sales enablement role is $191,000.
During the initial period, 10 sales team members receive cosell and AWS Marketplace training. This number increases to 20 in Year 2 and to 40 in Year 3.
The composite partner makes additional cosell investments as a percentage of influenced revenue. In Year 1, it invests 5% of its revenue into cosell activities, and this percentage decreases by 0.5% year-over-year as partnership revenue grows.
Risks. This revenue stream may vary depending on the following:
Whether the organization cosells with AWS.
The organization’s level of engagement and the degree to which it cosells.
The roles engaged in this work.
How the organization cosells.
How much training employees need.
Results. Forrester calculated three-year total PV investments (discounted at 10%) of $797,000.
Sell
Ref.
Metric
Source
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
E1
Cosell FTEs
Interviews
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
E2
Average fully burdened annual salary for an account executive
Composite
$243,000
$243,000
$243,000
$243,000
E3
Cosell enablement FTEs
Interviews
0.50
0.00
0.25
0.25
E4
Average fully burdened annual salary for a sales enablement role
Composite
$191,000
$191,000
$191,000
$191,000
E5
Sales FTEs receiving training
Composite
10
0
20
40
E6
Training time on AWS Marketplace and cosell (hours)
Interviews
4
0
2
2
E7
Average fully burdened hourly salary for an account executive
E2/2,080 hours
$117
$117
$117
$117
E8
Net new revenue
Initial: A5Y1+B9Y1+C9Y1; Y1-Y3: A5+B9+C9
$469,040
$469,040
$2,125,976
$6,909,520
E9
Additional sell expenditure as a percentage of partnership-influenced revenue
Composite
0%
5.0%
4.5%
4.0%
Et
Sell
(E1*E2)+(E3*E4)+(E5*E6*E7)+(E8*E9)
$100,180
$144,952
$269,599
$454,991
Three-year total: $969,722
Three-year present value: $796,605
Partnership Management And Operations
Evidence and data. Interviewees said their organizations invested in a designated or dedicated partnership management role to manage and grow their AWS partnerships. The organizations also invested labor to operationalize the partnership, and most invested in a partner ecosystem management solution to grow and scale.
Each interviewee said their organization had partnership management functions to help launch, manage, and grow the AWS partnership. This included helping to obtain competencies and Strategic Collaboration Agreements. For example, the global lead of cloud alliances for a revenue orchestration platform solution said, “I was hired as a full-time dedicated resource with dotted line to a couple other roles to build an impactful AWS partnership.” Similarly, the global alliance director for an integration platform as a service solution said: “I manage our global AWS business, including all aspects of the partnership and the go-to-market [coordination across] build, market, and sell [activities].”
Interviewees said their organizations also have partnership operations roles. The vice president for a security solution said, “We have three cloud desk people who help us with AWS Marketplace.” Additionally, operationalizing and growing the partnerships necessitated teamwide efforts from finance, customer success, and other roles.
Interviewees also said their organizations invested in partner ecosystem management solutions. Forrester defines partner ecosystem management solutions as “solutions that manage and/or support multiparty initiatives and collaborative go-to-market approaches, including account and data mapping, multiparty collaboration, partner attribution, integrations, and orchestration of resources (e.g., direct, indirect, e-commerce) to deliver more holistic value to mutual customers throughout their lifecycle.”9
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite partner:
The composite partner designates 0.5 FTEs to partnership management efforts with AWS each year.
The composite partner designates 0.75 FTEs to partnership operations efforts each year.
The fully burdened annual salary for a partnership management role is $337,500.
The fully burdened annual salary for a partnership operations role is $178,200.
The composite partner uses a partner ecosystem management solution that costs $30,000 per year.
Risks. This revenue stream may vary depending on the following:
The organization’s scale.
The organization’s level of partnership engagement.
How the organization manages its partnerships and operates.
The roles engaged in this work.
Whether the organization buys a partner ecosystem management solution.
Results. Forrester calculated three-year total PV investments (discounted at 10%) of $829,000.
Partnership Management And Operations
Ref.
Metric
Source
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
F1
Partnership management FTEs
Interviews
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
F2
Average fully burdened salary for a director of strategic alliances
Composite
$337,500
$337,500
$337,500
$337,500
F3
Partnership operations FTEs
Interviews
0.00
0.75
0.75
0.75
F4
Average fully burdened salary for an operations manager
Composite
$178,200
$178,200
$178,200
$178,200
F5
Partner ecosystem management solution
Interviews
$30,000
$0
$30,000
$30,000
Ft
Partnership management and operations
(F1*F2)+(F3*F4)+F5
$30,000
$302,400
$332,400
$332,400
Three-year total: $997,200
Three-year present value: $829,357
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year Metrics
Cash Flow Chart
[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costsTotal benefitsCumulative net benefitsInitialYear 1Year 2Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Total costs
($164,930)
($526,233)
($703,389)
($925,986)
($2,320,538)
($1,920,344)
Total benefits
$0
$337,709
$1,530,703
$4,974,854
$6,843,266
$5,309,734
Net benefits
($164,930)
($188,524)
$827,314
$4,048,868
$4,522,728
$3,389,390
ROI
176%
Payback
18 months
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Revenue Streams and Investments sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite partner’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Revenue Stream and Investment section.
The initial investment column contains investments incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Gross Profit, Total Investments, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those ISV partners considering building, marketing, and selling AI offerings built on AWS.
The objective of the framework is to identify the revenue streams, investments, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the holistic opportunity for ISV building, marketing, and selling AI offerings built on AWS.
Due Diligence
Interviewed AWS stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to the ISV opportunity for AI on AWS.
Interviews
Interviewed seven decision-makers at six partner ISV organizations with existing AWS partnerships to obtain data about investments, revenue streams, and risks.
Composite Partner Organization
Designed a composite partner organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the impact of building, marketing, and selling AI offerings built on AWS: revenue, investments, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase and partnership decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Revenue streams
Revenue streams represent the value of monetizable offerings and services made possible to partners by engaging in the partnership. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of revenue streams and investments, allowing for a full examination of the impact of a partnership to an organization.
Investments
Investments comprise all expenses necessary to kickstart, operate, and grow the partner practice. The methodology captures direct investments, such as capital expenditures, marketing expenses, and additional headcount, as well as indirect investments such as training, reskilling, and overhead.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of investments and revenues feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (revenues less investments) by investments.
Gross margin
Gross margin is the percentage of revenue that exceeds the cost of goods sold (COGS), reflecting the efficiency of partner offerings, services, and pricing strategies. It is calculated by subtracting COGS from total revenue and dividing the result by total revenue, then multiplying by 100.
Operating margin
Operating margin measures the percentage of revenue remaining after deducting operating expenses (excluding taxes and interest) from gross margin, indicating the profitability of core business operations. It is calculated by dividing operating income by total revenue and multiplying by 100.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net revenues (revenues minus investments) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Supplemental Material
Related Forrester Research
Lee Sustar, Max Ball, Carlos Casanova, Naveen Chhabra, Joe Cicman, Rowan Curran, Andras Cser, Charlie Dai, VP, Devin Dickerson, Dario Maisto, Faram Medhora, Tracy Woo, Noel Yuhanna, What We Saw At AWS re:Invent 2025, Forrester Blogs, December 10, 2025.
This study is commissioned by AWS and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an ISV investment in an AWS partnership.
AWS reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
AWS provided the partner names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.