Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Portnox Cloud
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Portnox, December 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Portnox, December 2025
IT networking acts as the nervous system of modern organizations, connecting systems, applications, and users to enable secure, reliable, and efficient data exchange. It underpins service delivery and business objectives while providing the foundation to address the complexities of distributed environments, microservices, Zero Trust security models, and digital transformation initiatives. Leading organizations are investing in advancements that enhance agility and user experience, blending security into cloud-native network operations to stay competitive and resilient in a rapidly changing digital landscape.1
Portnox Cloud is a cloud-native platform that unifies access controls across an organization’s network, applications, and infrastructure, helping them address modern security challenges with agility and scale. The platform delivers Zero Trust security, passwordless authentication, and compliance enforcement across identities, devices, data, and locations, enabling IT teams to deploy and manage network and endpoint security without on-premises infrastructure.
Portnox commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Portnox Cloud.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Portnox Cloud on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six decision-makers with experience using Portnox Cloud. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a globally distributed organization with $5 billion annual revenue and 50,000 devices.
Interviewees said that prior to using Portnox Cloud, their organizations struggled with outdated or overly complex network access control (NAC) systems, which required significant maintenance, specialized knowledge, and on-premises infrastructure. These legacy systems often experienced latency and disruption, affecting IT teams and end users alike. The systems lacked compatibility with modern cloud environments and diverse device types leading to operational inefficiencies, while small and resource-constrained IT teams had difficulty managing large-scale deployments and maintaining consistent security and network policies across distributed environments.
After the investment in Portnox Cloud, the interviewees described how their organizations were able to innovate and grow faster and more securely. They highlighted how the platform’s out-of-the-box visibility and easy-to-use interface connected devices and users for simplified management. Interviewees noted how this also helped improve business agility by supporting faster time to value and agile expansion into new markets through organic growth and mergers and acquisitions (M&A).
At the same time, interviewees shared how Portnox Cloud helped reduced reliance on centralized IT resources, enabling their organizations to grow without proportionally increasing headcount or complexity and allowing technical resources to focus on more urgent and complex network security activities. This enhanced security posture contributed to measurable reductions in breach risk and supported compliance with regulatory frameworks, helping reduce cybersecurity insurance premiums and improve insurability.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Forty percent reduction in networking technology costs. With Portnox’s cloud-native architecture, the composite organization eliminates the need for physical infrastructure, reducing capital expenditures for on-premises network hardware and associated licensing, storage, and energy costs. It consolidates multiple tools into its single Portnox Cloud environment and reduces the need for virtual infrastructure. This decreases networking hardware, software, and SaaS costs by 40% and allows the composite organization to reallocate 90% NAC management labor to higher-value activities with Portnox Cloud. Taken together, these optimizations total $2.8 million in savings for the composite.
Ninety percent faster time to value with new deployments. With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization rapidly expands or contracts across globally distributed locations without added costs or complex operations. It streamlines processes for opening and onboarding new sites, reducing hardware and deployment time and enabling faster and more efficient integration with minimal labor. The composite significantly reduces waste and accelerates time to market. Over the investment period, this business agility improves profit by $1.5 million.
Seventy-five percent reduced risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks. Portnox Cloud improves the composite organization’s protection against rogue devices by enforcing network-, application- and infrastructure-level access controls and device authentication, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized access and lateral movement. The composite’s IT teams gain insight and visibility into connected devices, monitoring for up-to-date antivirus and other posture checks, and can proactively block rogue or unmanaged endpoints. This enhanced security posture measurably reduces breach risk exposure by $1.3 million.
Ninety-five percent reduction in annual downtime hours. Portnox improves network reliability and performance by eliminating the on-premises infrastructure dependency that previously caused outages and authentication failures. Its cloud-native architecture provides high availability across multiple regions, reducing downtime and ensuring consistent connectivity. This improved performance and connectivity improves profit by $637,000 for the composite.
Twenty-five percent productivity improvement for networking operations. With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization’s network teams categorize devices better, enforce policies more consistently, and remediate issues more efficiently. The teams leverage streamlined workflows in the cloud-native environment, reducing manual effort and improving operational consistency. Overall, Portnox Cloud improves network operations, yielding $379,200 in labor savings for the composite.
Eighty percent faster and more streamlined end-user access to secure network resources. With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization’s users connect to the network more seamlessly, regardless of their location or device. Connections are faster with fewer reboots, and passwordless authentication leads to less chance of human error. This reduces the time to access a protected resource by 80%. The value of this improved end-user experience over three years totals $190,600.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
SecOps and disaster recovery improvements. Portnox Cloud enhances the composite’s security operations and disaster recovery through improved device authentication visibility, consistent policy enforcement, and faster recovery enabled by cloud-native architecture and integrated threat response capabilities.
IT help desk optimization. Portnox Cloud significantly reduces help desk workload and ticket volume by enabling automated workflows, real-time visibility, and rapid self-service issue resolution.
Improved cyber insurance and compliance posture. Portnox Cloud strengthens compliance and risk mitigation efforts, helping the composite meet cybersecurity insurance criteria and reduce premium costs through enhanced access control and endpoint hygiene.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Portnox Cloud annual costs of $1.6 million for 50,000 devices over three years. The composite organization simplifies licensing with Portnox, with agent-based and agentless devices allowing for tailored coverage across its 50,000 endpoints, IoT, and peripherals.
Deployment and administration costs of $112,800. The composite organization quickly stands up its Portnox Cloud environment and scales it across 50,000 devices over 150 sites. After full-scale implementation, it dedicates 3 hours per week to maintenance and administration.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $6.8 million over three years versus costs of $1.8 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $5.0 million and an ROI of 287%.
Faster time to value with Portnox Cloud
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
| Role | Industry | Region | Number of Devices |
|---|---|---|---|
| Director of infrastructure security | Hospitality | North America HQ, global operations | 100K |
| Network engineering manager | Technology | North America HQ, global operations | 17K |
| IT director | Healthcare | North America HQ | 400 |
| IT security administrator | Education | North America HQ | 12K |
| Network manager | Utilities | North America HQ | 10K |
| Information security manager | Entertainment | North America HQ | 1.2K |
Interviewees shared how their organizations faced significant challenges with network security and access control before their Portnox investments, including limited visibility into devices, difficulty enforcing policies, and risks from rogue access points. Maintaining their legacy NAC systems was resource-intensive, requiring specialized knowledge and frequent troubleshooting due to issues with certificates, server failures, and upgrade complications. Teams were small and overburdened, and licensing costs often exceeded the value delivered. Additionally, complex environments often resulted in network disruptions, leading to persistent operational strain and frequent connectivity issues for end users.
In particular, interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with:
Outdated network technology and management complexity. Organizations struggled with outdated or overly complex NAC systems. Licensing fees, hardware expenses, and the labor required to manage outdated infrastructure inflated technology costs, as these legacy systems required significant maintenance, specialized knowledge, and on-premises infrastructure. Limited visibility and remote management capabilities led to unnecessary travel and operational delays, while aging infrastructure and frequent technical failures monopolized staff resources and compounded IT team strain.
Constraints to scaling, mergers, and acquisitions. Inconsistent network environments and lack of visibility into inherited infrastructure hindered growth from acquisitions or geographic expansion. Organizations faced challenges onboarding new sites or offices due to manual processes, lack of automation, and limited scalability of legacy solutions. Interviewees reported resource-intensive scaling efforts requiring significant time and labor to achieve baseline network security. Additionally, localized solutions created onboarding bottlenecks and troubleshooting burdens and lacked compatibility with modern cloud environments and diverse device types and operating systems (e.g., Mac, Linux, IoT), making it difficult to integrate new entities quickly and securely.
Costly risks of material data breaches from unauthorized devices. Organizations faced substantial risk from unauthorized or rogue devices connecting to their networks, often without detection. In some cases, users plugged personal devices into corporate networks, bypassing security controls and exposing sensitive data. The lack of port-level security and device authentication created vulnerabilities that could be exploited for lateral movement or data exfiltration, particularly in environments handling regulated data such as PII, PCI, or HIPAA-sensitive information.
Poor network availability due to outages and severe performance degradation. Legacy systems contributed to frequent outages, sometimes affecting hundreds or thousands of devices. Hardware failures, server downtime, or software incompatibilities caused these disruptions, leading to degraded performance and unreliable connectivity. In some cases, network instability delayed business operations, impacted productivity, and required extensive troubleshooting efforts from IT teams.
Manual, time-consuming, and error-prone networking operations. Before adopting Portnox, interviewees shared how their small IT teams had difficulty managing large-scale deployments or maintaining consistent network policies across distributed environments. Networking operations were heavily manual, including tasks like media access control (MAC) address collection, port security configuration, and device classification. These processes consumed significant time, introduced errors, and required frequent intervention from IT staff. Lack of automation and centralized visibility made it difficult to enforce network-level, device- and user-based policies consistently or respond to issues quickly, especially in environments with limited staffing.
Disruption to end users. End users experienced frequent connectivity issues, long authentication times, and inconsistent access due to unreliable legacy systems. These disruptions affected productivity, delayed meetings, and created frustration across departments. In some cases, they impacted entire buildings or critical business functions, including point-of-sale systems and remote access capabilities. Tickets related to network access overwhelmed help desks, often requiring manual intervention and delaying resolution.
The interviewees searched for a fully cloud-native, unified access control solution that could support hybrid networks and align security with business growth objectives. Their organizations selected Portnox Cloud to invest in due to its:
Simplified deployment and user-friendly experience. Interviewees expressed the need for their technical teams to focus on supporting business objectives with the Portnox Cloud investment rather than merely maintain their environments.
Operational agility. Interviewees indicated that their organizations intended to move faster with their Portnox deployments, improving time to value and reducing maintenance costs and complexity with the agentless, cloud-native Portnox solution.
Meeting security and cyber insurance compliance needs. Interviewees noted that their organizations invested in Portnox Cloud to advance security, compliance, cyber insurance, and Zero Trust objectives.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The global composite organization is highly distributed and heavily regulated, with goals to accelerate business growth at scale. It has $5 billion annual revenue, 1% of which it earns through growth activities such as opening new sites and M&A.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization has eight FTEs on its networking team, which rolls out Portnox on 50,000 devices across 150 sites. As it shifts workloads from on-premises to the cloud, it is deploying a hybrid workforce strategy for its 100,000 FTEs.
Heavily regulated, compliance-driven, highly distributed
$5 billion annual revenue
100,000 FTEs
50,000 devices
150 sites
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Networking technology cost optimization | $1,127,071 | $1,127,071 | $1,127,071 | $3,381,214 | $2,802,859 |
| Btr | Improved business agility | $609,229 | $609,229 | $609,229 | $1,827,688 | $1,515,063 |
| Ctr | Reduced costs of a material data breach | $542,118 | $542,118 | $542,118 | $1,626,353 | $1,348,166 |
| Dtr | Improved performance and connectivity | $256,164 | $256,164 | $256,164 | $768,492 | $637,042 |
| Etr | Improved network operations | $152,490 | $152,490 | $152,490 | $457,470 | $379,220 |
| Ftr | Improved end-user experience | $44,442 | $44,442 | $44,442 | $133,325 | $110,520 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $2,731,514 | $2,731,514 | $2,731,514 | $8,194,541 | $6,792,870 |
Evidence and data. Portnox Cloud enabled interviewees’ organizations to reduce infrastructure and operational costs significantly by eliminating the need for on-premises appliances, complex licensing models, and high-maintenance legacy systems. The shift to a cloud-native architecture removed expenses related to server hardware, lifecycle management, and specialized support. In some cases, organizations reported savings and other optimizations from:
Reducing capital expenditures for hardware. Portnox significantly reduced capital outlays by eliminating the need for on-premises network hardware, including servers, routers, switches, and associated storage and energy costs.
Lowering software and SaaS costs with fewer requirements. By consolidating multiple tools into a single cloud-native solution, interviewees’ organizations avoided complex infrastructure investments, reduced the need for virtual infrastructure to manage their modernized networks, and cut software licensing and SaaS expenses. Interviewees credited those savings with needing fewer tools for the same functionalities at a lower, more flexible cost basis than the prior environment.
Dramatically reducing labor hours required for system management. Portnox reduced the time and effort required for network and server maintenance, allowing teams to free up valuable engineering resources and focus on higher-priority initiatives instead of routine system upkeep. Organizations reported a dramatic drop in maintenance time, as the platform’s “set it and forget it” nature allowed administrators to focus on higher-value activities such as security enforcement, network optimization, and user support. Features for MAC address and API integrations with identity providers and ticketing systems and real-time monitoring further minimized manual intervention. In some cases, automation and centralized visibility eliminated the need for one to two FTEs who would have managed access control at scale. These efficiencies translated to substantial cost savings and improved operational agility.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite organization spent $2.6 million on networking hardware, software, and SaaS costs.
With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization reduces capital outlays for on-premises network hardware and associated licensing, storage, and energy costs. It consolidates multiple tools into its single Portnox Cloud environment and reduces the need for virtual infrastructure. This decreases networking hardware, software, and SaaS costs by 40%.
In the prior environment, the composite organization dedicated three resources to maintaining the legacy network security stack.
With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization reduces the number of tools in its stack and switches to vendor-managed updates. This allows the composite organization to reallocate 90% NAC management labor to higher-value activities.
The fully burdened annual salary for a technical resource is $143,520.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s size, networking and security maturity, number of legacy tools, and internal labor effort to manage them can all influence IT spend.
An organization’s use of Portnox Cloud services and actual costs for required capabilities and existing contractual terms, including support and/or warranty costs.
Prevailing labor rates and the skill sets available.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.8 million.
Hours of network maintenance reallocated to higher-value activities with Portnox Cloud
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Networking hardware and software/SaaS costs in the prior environment | Composite | $2,553,337 | $2,553,337 | $2,553,337 | |
| A2 | Percentage reduction in networking hardware and software/SaaS costs with Portnox Cloud | Interviews | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| A3 | Subtotal: Reduction in networking hardware and software/SaaS costs | A1*A2 | $1,021,335 | $1,021,335 | $1,021,335 | |
| A4 | Total resources dedicated to networking hardware and software/SaaS maintenance in the prior environment | Composite | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| A5 | Percentage NAC management labor reallocated to higher-value activities with Portnox Cloud | Interviews | 90% | 90% | 90% | |
| A6 | Fully burdened annual salary for a technical resource | Composite | $143,520 | $143,520 | $143,520 | |
| A7 | Subtotal: Reduction in labor hours dedicated to networking hardware and software/SaaS maintenance | A4*A5*A6 | $387,504 | $387,504 | $387,504 | |
| At | Networking technology cost optimization | A3+A7 | $1,408,839 | $1,408,839 | $1,408,839 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Atr | Networking technology cost optimization (risk-adjusted) | $1,127,071 | $1,127,071 | $1,127,071 | ||
| Three-year total: $3,381,214 | Three-year present value: $2,802,859 | |||||
Evidence and data. Portnox’s cloud-native foundation allowed interviewees’ organizations to scale rapidly across geographies and business units without requiring additional infrastructure. Organizations opened and onboarded new sites without needing physical infrastructure or complex logistics, meaning they had minimal technical overhead for new sites, offices, and acquisitions. This reduction in effort and complexity allowed teams to expand or contract operations effortlessly, reducing waste and accelerating time to market.
The network manager at the utility company indicated that their organization was acquisitive, merging up to 20 acquired companies annually. They shared how Portnox Cloud helped their organization reduce onboarding time from days to hours: “We have an acquisition team that [used to] spend two business days getting the site converted for the average-sized site. But for Portnox, … the total time [is] about 5 hours.”
The network engineering manager at the technology company shared that their company was opening one or two offices a year and that Portnox accelerated business agility by enabling faster, more streamlined deployments across newly acquired sites and global offices. It rapidly reduced onboarding time, allowing teams to integrate new environments with minimal disruption and labor. They told Forrester: “I can add another 2,000 employees without asking for another new IT hire because I’m using Portnox right now, so I can scale really fast. Plus, I can use our engineering time to do what really matters, which is optimizing the end-office experience; improving productivity for the software engineering, QA, and testing teams; and having more time to spend one-on-one with people with issues than basically just telling them to open a ticket.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization opens or acquires two new sites annually.
In the prior environment, the composite organization generated 1% of its revenue, or $160,256 per week, from growth activities (e.g., expanding and opening new sites, M&A).
In the prior environment, the composite organization took 24 weeks to deploy or integrate new sites due to site and capacity planning, hardware appliance purchasing and procurement cycles, third-party expertise, and internal labor hours dedicated to training on and deploying systems.
With Portnox Cloud, the composite streamlines processes for opening and onboarding news sites, reducing hardware and deployment time from two full weeks to just 5 hours per location, enabling faster and more efficient integration with minimal labor. Portnox improves business agility by enabling rapid deployments and seamless scalability across globally distributed locations, decreasing the time it takes the composite to open new sites by 90%.
The composite organization’s operating margin is 11%.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s revenue, operating margin, and portion of revenue earned from companies acquired and/or new sites.
The number of companies acquired and/or new sites opened throughout the investment period and the legacy processes required to absorb a new company and/or open a new site in the prior environment.
Prevailing labor rates and the skill sets available.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.5 million.
Faster time to value with Portnox Cloud
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Revenue per site per week | Composite | $160,256 | $160,256 | $160,256 | |
| B2 | Sites opened or acquired per year | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| B3 | Time to deploy or integrate a new site in the prior environment (weeks) | Composite | 24 | 24 | 24 | |
| B4 | Percentage reduction in time to open a new site with Portnox Cloud | Interviews | 90% | 90% | 90% | |
| B5 | Operating margin | Composite | 11% | 11% | 11% | |
| Bt | Improved business agility | B1*B2*B3*B4*B5 | $761,537 | $761,537 | $761,537 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Btr | Improved business agility (risk-adjusted) | $609,229 | $609,229 | $609,229 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,827,688 | Three-year present value: $1,515,063 | |||||
Evidence and data. Portnox Cloud strengthened interviewees’ network security by enforcing network-level access controls and device authentication, significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized access and lateral movement. Their organizations gained visibility into connected devices and proactively blocked rogue or unmanaged endpoints, which enhanced their security posture and contributed to measurable risk reductions.
The IT director at the healthcare organization said: “[In the prior environment], we found out people were bringing in personal laptops, [which was] a massive issue because they could access anything from our [medical records] database. That would be great for [allowing lateral movement if their device was already compromised. Things like that could potentially be catastrophic. … Portnox has helped patch one of our biggest holes in our security infrastructure. We know what’s plugged in now [that] Portnox Cloud is stopping that kind of stuff.”
The network manager at the utility company indicated that Portnox improved protection against rogue devices across their organization’s 760 remote-managed sites: “Portnox definitely improved [our] risk posture. We don’t have that exposure to someone just bringing a rogue device onto our primary network. [With Portnox, we can] rest a little easier knowing that we have that in place at [our] sites. It gives me more insight into my environment. We know the types of devices that are out there now, as compared to before when we didn’t.”
The IT security administrator at the education organization noted: “[With Portnox Cloud], we are not getting a lot of those false negatives anymore. … I think it’s doing a much better job of making sure the [end-user device] antivirus is up to date than the previous system was. The previous system was only really checking for the presence of it, not necessarily the efficacy or the quality of [the antivirus. Sometimes it] would just outright fail and allow a computer through and we wouldn’t even know.”
The director of infrastructure security at the hospitality company said that preventing unauthorized devices from accessing the network also significantly reduced the amount of troubleshooting their teams had to do: “People are much less likely to just plug in random devices because they know that they’re not going to work. … You can’t even connect a printer, so we don’t have to take that call. It adds consistency to the environment where there was inconsistency.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
According to Forrester research:
With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization improves device visibility and data protection with automated policy enforcement, real-time endpoint risk posture assessment, and passwordless authentication via certificates. It centralizes access control to secure networks across endpoints, which, taken together, minimizes the composite’s exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks by 75%.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s size, industry, location, security maturity, legacy security capabilities, and level of Portnox Cloud coverage and adoption, which may influence security and risk metrics and breach impacts.
The frequency of security incidents involving persistent threat actors and remediation efforts in the prior environment.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.3 million.
Reduced risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks with Portnox Cloud
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Cumulative cost of breaches for the composite | Forrester research | $3,853,000 | $3,853,000 | $3,853,000 | |
| C2 | Likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches for the composite | Forrester research | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
| C3 | Percentage of breaches originating from a network-connected device | Forrester research | 35% | 35% | 35% | |
| C4 | Annual risk exposure addressable with Portnox Cloud | C1*C2*C3 | $903,529 | $903,529 | $903,529 | |
| C5 | Reduced risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks with Portnox Cloud | Interviews | 75% | 75% | 75% | |
| Ct | Reduced costs of a material data breach | C4*C5 | $677,647 | $677,647 | $677,647 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Ctr | Reduced costs of a material data breach (risk-adjusted) | $542,118 | $542,118 | $542,118 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,626,353 | Three-year present value: $1,348,166 | |||||
Evidence and data. By replacing unstable legacy systems with Portnox Cloud, interviewees’ organizations experienced fewer outages and improved network reliability. It reduced connection times from up to 10 seconds to near instantaneous, and authentication failures dropped dramatically. Helpdesk tickets related to connectivity issues decreased from dozens per day to just a few per month. These improvements translated to better availability of critical services and reduced business disruption, particularly in environments with high user mobility or distributed operations.
The network engineering manager at the technology company shared: “We used to have roughly a monthly outage due to [our legacy solution], and those outages varied from 15 devices not being able to connect to a thousand [employee and IoT] devices not being able to connect. … [Now we have] high availability … so it’s a really solid, fast deployment.”
The information security manager at the entertainment company told Forrester how Portnox improved network performance and connectivity by eliminating the need for on-site appliances and manual capacity planning, resulting in fewer outages and more reliable access. Its cloud-native architecture enhanced availability and resilience, allowing operations to continue even during regional disruptions. They said: “We would have a few outages because of the requirement for [our legacy solution] to have on-prem resourcing. If that site went down, then the VPN was just not accessible. Even if we had a backup VPN collector, we couldn’t authenticate. … [Portnox Cloud] is life-changing because now I can actually go on vacation and not have to worry about getting an email about why the network is down and have to hop on a hotspot somewhere.”
The information security manager at the entertainment company indicated that their organization’s prior environment often experienced widespread business disruption. With Portnox Cloud, however, they mitigated this disruption: “We wouldn’t be able to produce [items] that were producing future revenue. There was one instance that delayed us about a week. … [Even though Portnox is] a cloud solution, there’s also a significant ability to have on-prem as failover, so if you lose the cloud, you still are functioning. That’s another reason why it [provides] such good stability for the network and for people who need to be able to do what they need to do.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite organization experienced 36 hours of network downtime annually due to outages and severe performance degradations, which impacted 15% of revenue-related systems.
With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization improves network performance and connectivity by eliminating the need for additional appliances, whether proprietary servers or VMs. It improves onboarding and offboarding through automation and continues to uphold network integrity and availability, resulting in fewer outages and more reliable access. Its cloud-native architecture enhances availability and resilience and reduces the total annual hours of downtime due to outages by 95%, recapturing 34 hours of network downtime. By reducing downtime and operational disruptions, Portnox enables teams to maintain productivity and avoid delays in revenue-generating activities.
The fully burdened hourly rate for an end user is $40, and end users reattribute 25% of time savings to productive use.
The composite organization’s operating margin is 11%.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s size, industry, and location, which may impact profitability, network performance, uptime, and other network availability factors prior to Portnox Cloud.
Prevailing labor rates and the extent to which end users can recapture saved time toward productive work.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $637,000.
Annual network downtime recaptured with Portnox Cloud
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Annual network downtime in the prior environment (hours) | Composite | 36 | 36 | 36 | |
| D2 | Percentage improvement in performance and connectivity with Portnox Cloud | Interviews | 95% | 95% | 95% | |
| D3 | Annual network downtime recaptured with Portnox Cloud (hours) | D1*D2 | 34 | 34 | 34 | |
| D4 | Percentage of revenue-related systems impacted by network downtime in the prior environment | Composite | 15% | 15% | 15% | |
| D5 | Average revenue generated per hour | Composite | $570,776 | $570,776 | $570,776 | |
| D6 | Operating margin | Composite | 11% | 11% | 11% | |
| Dt | Improved performance and connectivity | D3*D4*D5*D6 | $320,205 | $320,205 | $320,205 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Dtr | Improved performance and connectivity (risk-adjusted) | $256,164 | $256,164 | $256,164 | ||
| Three-year total: $768,492 | Three-year present value: $637,042 | |||||
Evidence and data. Portnox Cloud unified and simplified network access management, allowing IT teams to categorize devices, enforce policies, and troubleshoot issues more efficiently. The platform’s agentless and agent-based options supported flexible deployment across diverse environments. Interviewees reported streamlined workflows, reduced manual effort, and improved operational consistency. This freed up IT staff to focus on higher-value initiatives such as automation, architecture optimization, and security enforcement.
The director of infrastructure security at the hospitality company shared several time-saving automations that benefited their networking team, including an automatic daily email report identifying switches the team needed to enroll in the program. The importance of these and other automations was significant: “I would say all of the above innovations eliminate the need for one to two additional FTEs to support this solution. We would never be able to handle the volume of requests or operationally maintain the solution at current staffing levels without these automations. [For another option we considered], we were going to have to run in [the public cloud with virtual infrastructure] on top of it and then [the NAC solution] on top of that. It was an incredibly complex solution to manage. … [We] estimated that we would need six FTEs dedicated to managing the [competitor NAC solution, versus] one-quarter of an FTE for Portnox.”
The network engineering manager at the technology company indicated that Portnox Cloud had quicker, more intuitive workflows compared to their prior environment, which permitted faster onboarding of critical, high-value developer resources: “Once we deploy it, we don’t have to do a lot of changes. If you like what you see, just keep it this way and move on with your life. That’s one of the nice things about Portnox. … I want to get someone who doesn’t know anything about the tool to be an expert within 80 hours, two weeks. This is really feasible with Portnox, but was not feasible with other products.”
The network manager at the utility company discussed how Portnox Cloud made it significantly easier for network security resources to track and shut down rogue devices: “Just tracking down rogue devices or investigating something [has] definitely saved us some time. … Portnox gave us insight about radius authentication for endpoint devices and IoT devices. We are also using TACACS, which is to authenticate to switches once we roll Portnox or network-attached storage devices and that gives us some insight into who’s doing what in our environment. We did not have that before. We were using local logins on network devices. We have that accounting of changes and access that we did not have before.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite dedicated five FTEs to networking operations.
With Portnox Cloud, the composite network teams can better categorize devices, more consistently enforce policies, and more efficiently troubleshoot issues. The teams leverage streamlined workflows in the cloud-native environment, reducing manual effort and improving operational consistency. This allows the networking team to reallocate 25% of its networking operations to higher-value activities without needing to add resources as the organization scales.
The average fully burdened annual salary for a technical resource is $143,520.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The number of users and the amount of time spent configuring and enforcing policies, provisioning users and sites, and other relevant NetOps activities.
Legacy processes and solutions required to add, secure, and manage users and networking infrastructure in the prior environment.
Prevailing labor rates, the skill sets available, and the extent to which IT resources can recapture time savings toward productive work.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $379,000.
Hours of networking labor reallocated to higher-value activities with Portnox Cloud
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | FTEs dedicated to networking operations in prior environment | Composite | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| E2 | Percentage networking operations reallocated to higher-value activities with Portnox Cloud | Interviews | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| E3 | Fully burdened annual salary for a technical resource | Composite | $143,520 | $143,520 | $143,520 | |
| Et | Improved network operations | E1*E2*E3 | $179,400 | $179,400 | $179,400 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Etr | Improved network operations (risk-adjusted) | $152,490 | $152,490 | $152,490 | ||
| Three-year total: $457,470 | Three-year present value: $379,220 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees described how their organizations’ Portnox Cloud environments benefited end users, from faster onboarding and fewer disruptions to more consistent access locations. Portnox Cloud’s automation and self-service capabilities enabled immediate resolution of access issues, often within minutes, without requiring IT intervention. This significant reduction in end-user downtime improved productivity and enhanced user satisfaction. In particular, interviewees shared how Portnox enabled easier and more streamlined secure access to network resources with:
Improved posturing approaches. The information security manager at the entertainment company described how Portnox Cloud impacted their end users’ ability to connect to network resources, something they needed to do multiple times a day. They indicated that the Portnox environment was faster, easier, and safer: “I think posturing has definitely become a lot easier for them since Portnox takes the agent-based approach. That process is a lot faster and a lot smoother. Initially, if they wanted to access a protected resource, it would take a good amount of time, several retries [totaling] 1 minute, maybe up to 2 minutes. They would often have complete network drops on their devices before they got access to anything. But with Portnox, we really haven’t seen that.”
Passwordless authentication via certificates. The information security manager at the entertainment company indicated: “With the old environment, we had to run physical nodes everywhere and each one of those physical nodes had its own certificate, so if a user went to a different site, they would be prompted to accept the new certificate. [Now with Portnox], people can go to any of our facilities, and they’re automatically connected, they don’t have to reauthenticate. They have certificates on the machine, and they are ready to roll.”
Reduced impact area. The information security manager at the entertainment company further indicated that Portnox Cloud’s improved performance reduced the frequency as well as the breadth of network-related disruptions: “In the prior environment, people were having problems connecting to the internet every day and it wasn’t just our time [in IT that was impacted] — the whole organization’s time was impacted. And now when we hear about [any connection issues with Portnox], it’s much, much rarer and it’s usually restricted to one or two people rather than a whole building, and those usually tend to be more of a user error than a technology [issue].”
Less disruptive device remediation procedures. The information security manager at the entertainment company indicated that Portnox Cloud provided their users with a more seamless experience, even when their devices were engaged in remediation activities: “It’s a much more graceful failure for the users. With Portnox, they are just over on the guest network rather than completely cut off, so the experience has probably improved for end users.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, 10,000 FTEs required access to protected network resources.
On average, it took 10 seconds to access a protected network resource in the prior environment, which FTEs accessed an average of 250 times annually. This led to FTEs spending nearly 7,000 hours accessing protected resources annually across the entire organization.
With Portnox Cloud, the composite organization’s users connect to their network more seamlessly, regardless of their location or device. Connections are faster with fewer reboots, and passwordless authentication leads to less chance for human error. This reduces the time to access a protected resource by 80%.
The fully burdened hourly rate for an end user is $40, and end users reattribute 25% of time savings to productive use.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The performance of an organization’s legacy environment.
The size of an organization, its employee base, and the breadth of Portnox Cloud adoption.
Prevailing labor rates and each user’s ability to recapture time savings toward productive activities.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $111,000.
Reduction in time to access network resources with Portnox Cloud
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Total FTEs accessing protected network resources | Composite | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| F2 | Total time to access a protected network resource in the prior environment (seconds) | Composite | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| F3 | Total annual end-user time spent accessing a protected resource in the prior environment (hours) | (F1*F2*250) /3,600 | 6,944 | 6,944 | 6,944 | |
| F4 | Percentage reduction in time to access a resource with Portnox Cloud | Interviews | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| F5 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| F6 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for an end user | Composite | $40 | $40 | $40 | |
| Ft | Improved end-user experience | F3*F4*F5*F6 | $55,552 | $55,552 | $55,552 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Ftr | Improved end-user experience (risk-adjusted) | $44,442 | $44,442 | $44,442 | ||
| Three-year total: $133,325 | Three-year present value: $110,520 | |||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
SecOps and disaster recovery improvements. Portnox Cloud enhanced security operations by improving visibility into device authentication and enabling more consistent policy enforcement across distributed environments. The cloud-native architecture supported faster recovery times, with the ability to isolate compromised devices and integrate with endpoint detection tools contributing to a more resilient and proactive security posture.
IT help desk optimization. Deploying Portnox Cloud led to measurable reductions in help desk workload and ticket volume. Interviewees’ organizations that previously handled dozens of access-related tickets daily saw that number drop to just a few per month. Automated workflows and real-time visibility allowed lower-tier support staff to resolve issues independently, reducing escalations and improving response times. In some cases, self-service mechanisms resolved device unblock requests within minutes, significantly improving operational efficiency and freeing up IT resources for strategic initiatives.
Improved cyber insurance posture. Portnox Cloud contributed to stronger compliance alignment and risk mitigation, which improved organizations’ standing with cybersecurity insurers. By enforcing port-level security and preventing unauthorized device access, organizations met key insurance criteria and reduced exposure to potential breaches. Several organizations noted that Portnox Cloud helped them retain coverage or qualify for lower premiums by demonstrating enhanced control over network access and endpoint hygiene. The platform’s integration with identity providers and endpoint protection systems further supported audit readiness and policy compliance.
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Portnox Cloud and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including integrations with other network, security, and operational tools.
The information security manager at the entertainment company indicated that their organization was looking at integrating Portnox with SentinelOne, their managed detection and response platform: “I’m anticipating that will help significantly because it looks like from the roadmap, Portnox will be able to tell SentinelOne to isolate and do all these other automations and such.”
The network engineer at the technology company shared: “Integration with modern services is key. As we’re shifting our organization to more cloud-centric platforms, [our legacy NAC] could not support that. In terms of integrations, any kind of authentication against our identity provider just did not work very well, [whereas] with Portnox, integrations work great.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gtr | Portnox Cloud annual costs | $0 | $660,000 | $660,000 | $660,000 | $1,980,000 | $1,641,322 |
| Htr | Deployment and administration | $79,488 | $14,242 | $12,917 | $12,917 | $119,563 | $112,815 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $79,488 | $674,242 | $672,917 | $672,917 | $2,099,563 | $1,754,137 |
Evidence and data. Portnox Cloud enabled interviewees’ organizations to streamline licensing and reduce software-related overhead by offering a scalable, subscription-based model. The flexibility of the model allowed organizations to scale use without immediate penalties or service interruptions. This approach supported dynamic environments where device counts fluctuated due to growth, acquisitions, or seasonal demand.
The network engineering manager at the technology company shared that their Portnox Cloud’s subscription-based licensing scheme was flexible and scalable, requiring no new servers or resources and with no hard limits on additional licenses: “Portnox is easy to scale. I don’t have to deploy any new servers or any new resources. I was just going to ask for more licenses. … Cost efficiency is really great because it’s subscription based. I’m just going to pay for the licenses that I’m using.”
Pricing may vary. Contact Portnox for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the composite organization licenses 50,000 devices with a mix of full agent deployments and standard device coverage over a three-year period.
Risks. Risks that may impact this cost include the number of Portnox solutions deployed, and the size, coverage, and adoption of the Portnox Cloud deployment.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Portnox Cloud annual costs | Composite | $0 | $600,000 | $600,000 | $600,000 |
| Gt | Portnox Cloud annual costs | G1 | $0 | $600,000 | $600,000 | $600,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Gtr | Portnox Cloud annual costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $660,000 | $660,000 | $660,000 | |
| Three-year total: $1,980,000 | Three-year present value: $1,641,322 | |||||
Evidence and data. Organizations experienced streamlined and cost-effective deployments with Portnox Cloud, avoiding the need for complex infrastructure or extensive professional services. Initial setup timelines varied depending on scale, with some organizations completing pilot deployments in less than a week and full rollouts across dozens of sites within a few months. Some organizations opted for slower implementation schedules due to business requirements specific to their organizations.
Deployment. Portnox’s cloud-native architecture eliminated the need for on-premises appliances, reducing hardware provisioning, shipping logistics, and associated costs. Resource-constrained internal teams were able to manage deployments without requiring additional headcount or external consultants, thanks to Portnox’s intuitive configuration workflows and automation capabilities. In one case, deployment across 36 global offices took approximately six months to complete, while another organization onboarded hundreds of sites over a two-year period.
Administration. Portnox Cloud significantly reduced ongoing administrative overhead by simplifying network access controls and automating routine tasks.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the initial two-month deployment period, the composite partially dedicates four resources to standing up the Portnox Cloud. Each resource dedicates an average of 240 hours to initial deployment.
The composite organization scales Portnox Cloud across the remainder of the organization’s 50,000 devices at 150 sites in Year 1, with three resources dedicating 40 hours each to the global implementation of Portnox Cloud.
In Year 1, the composite organization dedicates 1 hour per week to maintaining the existing Portnox environment. After full-scale implementation, it dedicates 3 hours per week to maintenance and administration.
The fully burdened hourly rate for resources dedicated to deployment and management is $69.
Risks. The following risks may impact this cost:
The size, scope, and complexity of deployment and the legacy environment.
Implementation and ongoing management requirements, organizational priorities, and change management efforts.
Prevailing labor rates, internal skill sets, and training requirements for IT resources and end users.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $113,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Total internal resources dedicated to deployment and implementation | Interviews | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| H2 | Average time dedicated to initial deployment per resource (hours) | Interviews | 240 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| H3 | Average time dedicated to global implementation per resource (hours) | Interviews | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| H4 | Fully burdened hourly rate for resources dedicated to deployment and management | Composite | $69 | $69 | $69 | $69 |
| H5 | Subtotal: Deployment and scaling | (H1*(H2+H3))*H4 | $66,240 | $8,280 | $0 | $0 |
| H6 | Administration time per year (hours) | Interviews | 0 | 52 | 156 | 156 |
| H7 | Subtotal: Administration | H4*H6 | 0 | $3,588 | $10,764 | $10,764 |
| Ht | Deployment and administration | H5+H7 | $66,240 | $11,868 | $10,764 | $10,764 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑20% | |||||
| Htr | Deployment and administration (risk-adjusted) | $79,488 | $14,242 | $12,917 | $12,917 | |
| Three-year total: $119,563 | Three-year present value: $112,815 | |||||
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($79,488) | ($674,242) | ($672,917) | ($672,917) | ($2,099,563) | ($1,754,137) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $2,731,514 | $2,731,514 | $2,731,514 | $8,194,541 | $6,792,870 |
| Net benefits | ($79,488) | $2,057,272 | $2,058,597 | $2,058,597 | $6,094,978 | $5,038,733 |
| ROI | 287% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Portnox Cloud.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Portnox Cloud can have on an organization.
Interviewed Portnox stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Portnox Cloud.
Interviewed six decision-makers at organizations using Portnox Cloud to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feeds into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
1 Source: The Top 10 Trends In IT Networking, 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., July 14, 2025.
2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
3 Regression analysis of the reported total cumulative costs of all breaches experienced by security decision-makers’ organizations in the past 12 months. The composite organization’s revenue is used as the input to the regression formula. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “Using your best estimate, what was the total cumulative cost of all breaches experienced by your organization in the past 12 months?” Base: 1,660 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months.
4 Regression analysis of the likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches, using the frequency that organizations experienced breaches in the past 12 months as reported by security decision-makers. The composite organization’s revenue is used as the input to the regression formula. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “How many times do you estimate that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months?” Base: 2,769 global security decision-makers.
5 Percentage of breaches by primary attack vector for breaches, as reported by security decision-makers whose organizations experienced at least one breach in the last 12 months. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “Of the times that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months, please indicate how many of each fall into the categories below.” Base: 1,542 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Portnox and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Portnox Cloud. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Portnox Cloud based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Portnox or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Portnox and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Portnox make no warranties of any kind.
Portnox reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Portnox provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Courtenay O’Connor
December 2025
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html