Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Optimizely One

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By The Optimizely One Platform

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Optimizely, SEPTEMBER 2025

[CONTENT]

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Optimizely One

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By The Optimizely One Platform

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Optimizely, SEPTEMBER 2025

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

According to Forrester research, adding to or improving digital experiences is the top key action being taken by organizations to enhance the experience of end customers.1 Organizations planning to adopt a digital experience platform need a solution that has a comprehensive set of capabilities to ensure high-level digital performance and to best position them for business growth.

The Optimizely One platform consists of solutions across content management, content marketing, optimization, analysis, commerce, and personalization that provide end-to-end support for the marketing lifecycle through a single, AI-powered workflow.

Optimizely commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Optimizely One.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Optimizely One on their organizations.

446%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$5.8M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers with experience using Optimizely One solutions. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is an industry-agnostic (i.e., having multiple business lines in different industries), enterprise-sized company that generates $2 billion in annual revenue with more than 5,000 employees.

Interviewees said that prior to adopting Optimizely One solutions, their organizations had personally created solutions or took a best-of-breed approach with their solutions to provide support to marketing teams. This approach required oversight of the integrations between platforms, led to siloed operations with each tool, and created technical challenges like data flowing incorrectly or legacy solution incompatibility with newer solutions.

After investing in Optimizely One solutions, the interviewees improved operations around building digital experiences with its integrated technology, flexibility of dynamic content management system (CMS) templates, and depth of insights from optimization tests and their resulting analysis. Decision-makers elected to retire legacy solutions as they saw greater engagement and revenue from customers responding to compelling digital experiences built with Optimizely One. Interviewees also planned to make further use of Optimizely One’s AI capabilities to further improve customer experience performance.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • More engaging, relevant digital experiences drive digital session visit growth of 5% and digital conversion gains of 8%. With Optimizely One solutions, users build more dynamic digital experiences that have been tested to ensure that they engage customers. Web pages rank higher in SEO, sites load faster, and sites are easier to navigate, creating more opportunities to convert customers. Personalization in the form of more relevant content and product recommendations, with improved targeting of audiences, drives greater conversions. In Year 1, the composite organization sees additional revenue of $17.3 million and a risk-adjusted profit of $1.3 million, growing to revenue of $40.3 million and profit of $3.0 million in Year 3.

  • Value of data analysts with Optimizely One analysis tools rises 30%. Data analysts gain greater visibility over key performance indicators within a single dashboard. Insights from Optimizely Analytics accelerate the speed with which analysts share takeaways with the rest of their organization, enabling faster time to market on changes to digital experiences and driving consistent business performance. Additional value generated by data analysts grows from 20% more in Year 1 to 30% more in Year 3. This results in the composite delivering $2 million of additional revenue in Year 1 and $3 million of additional revenue in Year 2, as risk-adjusted profit totals $160,000 in Year 1 and $240,000 in Year 3.

“We have better analytics and insights in terms of engagement that we’re starting to employ, alongside Optimizely’s Content Recommendation product. We can see the engagement is higher because we’re making more engaging content that we refresh more.”

Assistant VP of digital enablement, insurance

  • Productivity in creating digital experiences accelerates by 40% among developers and 35% among content marketers. In addition, marketers see a 50% increase in productivity around content created for nondigital-experience-related initiatives. The flexibility of CMS templates and ease with which marketers can add new features and update pages free bandwidth among developers. Meanwhile, the ease with which optimization tests can be conducted helps marketers to quickly make changes to digital experiences. Marketers also have greater oversight of the customer journey with Optimizely’s Content Marketing Platform, streamlining their ability to orchestrate customer engagement. The composite organization sees $283,500 in productivity value in Year 1, increasing to $340,500 in Year 3 as the organization matures its use cases with Optimizely One.

  • Legacy solution cost savings increase by 33% annually. The composite organization offloads legacy solutions as it migrates operations to Optimizely One, freeing budget that had gone to overseeing them. Cost savings totaling $650,000 over the three years are recouped and go toward investing in Optimizely One.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Optimizely AI capabilities streamline operations. Usage of Optimizely’s Opal can help analysts queue up data insights without them having to look at their dashboard. In addition, Opal can make recommendations on how to effectively carry out optimization tests and take steps to set up, review, or even build those optimizations. Optimizely’s agentic AI also promises to help conduct tasks like creating documented summarizations of test results. These capabilities can save users’ time, enhance the quality of data insights, and drive greater value for the organization.

  • Positive employee experience increases from enhanced operations. Wider self-service of analysis and content creation tools across the organization reduces friction around wait time for team support. Users also move with greater confidence in decision-making based on the quality of insights from Optimizely, reducing the amount of trial-and-error tests around digital experiences previously experienced.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Implementation costs of Optimizely One. An internal technical team works with Optimizely to implement Optimizely One solutions to ensure that they are integrated without any issues.

  • Optimizely One licensing costs. Annual licensing fees are based on the number of solutions in use and scale of operations at the composite organization.

  • Training costs for solutions. Users of Optimizely One solutions spend a short period of time familiarizing themselves with the technology, developing best practices along the way.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $7.1 million over three years versus costs of $1.3 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $5.8 million and an ROI of 446%.

Key Statistics

446%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$7.1M

Benefits PV 

$5.8M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Additional value realized from more engaing digital experiences Greater data analysis value Productivity in creating digital experiences and content Legacy solution cost savings

The Optimizely One Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Optimizely One investment
Interviews
Role Industry Region Employees
Director, analytics engineering SaaS North America headquarters, global operations <1,000
Assistant VP of digital enablement Insurance North America headquarters, global operations 30,000+
Principal of digital growth Leasing North America headquarters 10,000+
VP of digital experience Manufacturing North America headquarters, global operations <20,000
Senior director of product analytics Automotive North America headquarters, global operations 25,000+
Key Challenges

Prior to adopting the Optimizely One solution, interviewees took a DIY approach to building solutions or assembled a best-of-breed lineup of technology to build out digital experiences and support lifecycle marketing. However, this before state yielded several common challenges, including:

  • Limited ability to scale their digital footprint. Interviewees’ legacy solutions for creating dynamic digital experiences were outdated, with templates and capabilities that required extensive work to modernize. The solutions didn’t seamlessly integrate with one another; in some cases, the front end required a .NET format, while the back end required Java. A middle layer of management was necessary to oversee technical support for digital site operations, which slowed organizational growth in adding or updating websites and functionality across digital platforms. Interviewees working with agencies would outsource creation of microsites to those teams, further decentralizing oversight of digital experiences.

“I think we had four different architectures running at some point between the back end and the front end. It wasn’t one consistent stack of architecture to go from back end to front end.”

Assistant VP of digital enablement, insurance

  • Inability to effectively review digital experience performance. While interviewees could use other tools to conduct optimization tests on new sites or functionality, they struggled to derive meaningful insights from the analysis. They could see what was performing well and what wasn’t, but they couldn’t grasp the “why” on differences in performance. The senior director of product analytics at an automotive organization said: “I found it pretty challenging to use any third-party solution for analyzing the end-to-end user journey without heavy work on the technical side. We shifted to in-house data collection and tracking, which was better, but that didn’t have a GUI [graphical user interface] that we still needed.”

  • A lack of personalization for marketing materials to engage customers. Limited insights on digital performance and the ability to leverage customer data to better target customers resulted in marketing teams creating unengaging experiences. Customers often received information or product recommendations that were not relevant to what they were looking for. In addition, they spent too long searching across their sites for information because pages weren’t centralized and there wasn’t a tool to help guide them.

  • Ongoing costs to maintain legacy solutions. Each legacy point solution at the interviewees’ organizations carried individual costs, including licensing and budget for staff with specialized knowledge of each technology. Time spent toward maintaining integrations across the architecture took bandwidth away from employees’ work to improve digital operations and customer experiences.

“We picked the full suite of products [from Optimizely One] to ultimately deliver the experiences we envision for our customers. It presented a unique opportunity for us, and instead of taking an incremental approach, we got buy-in to go all in.”

VP of digital experience, manufacturing

Investment Objectives

The interviewees identified Optimizely One as having solutions that could:

  • Pull deep insights from optimization tests and provide thorough data analysis to improve digital experiences.

  • Efficiently scale production of dynamic, personalized, and engaging digital experiences.

  • Drive greater revenue returns from customers and value delivered from analysts.

  • Reduce reliance on aging legacy solutions to support marketing efforts.

“We want our users to start with prebuilt metrics and dashboards that they can easily explore by themselves. Potentially, [they could] even analyze user-level journeys or details, and no other solution really offers that [than Optimizely Analytics].”

Director, analytics engineering, SaaS

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a global, industry-agnostic (with multiple business lines), enterprise-sized company with $2 billion in annual revenue and more than 5,000 employees. Prior to leveraging Optimizely One, the organization had ad hoc point solutions in place, both self-built and best of breed, for building digital experiences as well as testing and analyzing performance. Management of each solution required additional bandwidth and oversight of integrations; further, scalability of digital experience production was limited.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization adds Optimizely One solutions all at once and works over a few months to stand them up, ensuring integrations are seamless and data is flowing correctly. Over time, the organization phases out legacy solutions as it shifts operations to Optimizely One. There are 125 employees leveraging Optimizely One solutions, including developers and marketers working on digital experiences, marketers creating content not related to digital experiences, and data analysts testing functionality and features and reviewing results.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $2 billion annual revenue

  • Multiple business lines; industry-agnostic

  • Global operations

  • 5,000+ employees

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Additional value realized from more engaging digital experiences $1,299,120 $2,149,755 $3,022,800 $6,471,675 $5,228,750
Btr Greater data analysis value $160,000 $200,000 $240,000 $600,000 $491,059
Ctr Productivity in creating digital experiences and content $283,500 $312,000 $340,500 $936,000 $771,401
Dtr Legacy solution cost savings $160,000 $320,000 $320,000 $800,000 $650,338
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $1,902,620 $2,981,755 $3,923,300 $8,807,675 $7,141,548
Additional Value Realized From More Engaging Digital Experiences

Evidence and data. Interviewees saw gains in business performance from leveraging Optimizely One’s solutions to build more dynamic and engaging digital experiences. Starting with Optimizely’s Content Marketing Platform (CMP), marketers broke down siloed operations by gaining full visibility of content workstreams. This solution helped to streamline campaign planning around audiences reached and management of timeline for deployment, accelerating time to market for content.

“The CMS has more robust capabilities than we had before, especially with how we include personalization into our campaigns. We’re also stepping into experimentation, and the way in which we measure our campaigns is much improved. We shift and pivot better than we have in the past.”

VP of digital experience, manufacturing

The flexibility of testing optimizations on web content, alongside the ease of use of Optimizely’s Content Management System, enabled marketers to quickly test custom functionality for buttons, page visuals, layouts, and any other updates to digital experiences. Regular testing and iteration on content drove higher performance in accessibility, with sites loading faster, better performance with SEO rankings, and time spent with improved navigation for customers. The assistant VP of digital enablement at an insurance organization said: “Our SEO was vastly improved with Optimizely. The SEO scores went from a C-level to an A. Our accessibility scores weren’t fully WCAG [Web Content Accessibility Guidelines]-compliant or to the standards we set for ourselves, and we’ve upgraded all of those with Optimizely.”

5%

Increase in digital web sessions by Year 3

Integrations with Optimizely Data Platform enabled interviewees to segment audiences based on customer data, and then Optimizely Personalization helped them to tailor messaging and visuals to specific audiences. With Optimizely Commerce’s AI-based search results and recommendations based on customer behavior, interviewees made sure that customers saw relevant products. Altogether, these capabilities drove higher conversion rates at organizations as more engaged customers found products they were interested in. The principal of digital growth at a leasing organization said: “We onboarded Product Recommendations, and we tested with the same website user interface for ‘shop similar items’ functionality. We saw the click-through rate on the product recommendations page improve 200% at a 99% significance over our control.”

“[Our website] performs better because you have real data behind [it] that’s validated and makes the case [that] change is better for the business’ bottom line. When you start calculating the dollar value impact, business leaders sit up and take notice.”

Principal of digital growth, leasing

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • On an annual basis, the organization’s web portals receive 125 million digital sessions (visitors who spend a few minutes and/or visit multiple pages).

  • Each year, an additional site is built that otherwise would not have been built without Optimizely One enhancing productivity.

  • Accessibility to web portals improves through optimization, better SEO, and faster site loading. Sessions increase by 2% to 5% as the organization improves its digital foundation.

8%

Increase in digital conversions by Year 3

  • The average conversion rate on digital sessions prior to Optimizely One was 2%. After leveraging the solutions, the conversion rate improves by 4% in Year 1 and increases to an 8% improvement in Year 3. Gains for the organization are driven by higher-quality content and more effective customer targeting making for more personalized digital experiences.

  • The average value of a digital customer order is $100. This represents the value of a converted session where a customer may have signed up for a service or purchased one or more items.

  • A profit margin of 10% is applied to the revenue results.

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The prior state annual number of sessions on organization’s digital portals and conversion rate on those sessions.

  • The average value of conversions and the profit margin applied.

  • The impact level of digital performance on revenue.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.2 million.

Additional Value Realized From More Engaging Digital Experiences
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Total annual digital sessions Composite 125,000,000 125,000,000 125,000,000
A2 Total additional sites built since adopting Optimizely One solutions Interviews 1 2 3
A3 Additional sessions from added sites Composite 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000
A4 Increase in sessions from improved site performance Interviews 2.0% 3.5% 5.0%
A5 Additional digital sessions (A1+A3)*A4 2,520,000 4,445,000 6,400,000
A6 Average digital conversion rate before Optimizely One Composite 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
A7 Increase in digital conversions with Optimizely One Interviews 4% 6.0% 8%
A8 Additional converted audience (A1*(A6*A7))+(((A3+A5)*(A6+(A6*A7)))) 173,216 286,634 403,040
A9 Average digital customer value Composite $100 $100 $100
A10 Revenue from additional converted audience A8*A9 $17,321,600 $28,663,400 $40,304,000
A11 Profit margin TEI methodology 10% 10% 10%
At Additional value realized from more engaging digital experiences A10*A11 $1,732,160 $2,866,340 $4,030,400
  Risk adjustment ↓25%      
Atr Additional value realized from more engaging digital experiences (risk-adjusted)   $1,299,120 $2,149,755 $3,022,800
Three-year total: $6,471,675 Three-year present value: $5,228,750
Greater Data Analysis Value

Evidence and data. Optimizely Analytics enabled interviewees to move away from importing data to spreadsheets or using tools that require manual review of data for insights. With Analytics, they saw data automatically uploaded to dashboards, improving the visibility of dozens of tracked metrics.

At interviewees’ organizations, the Analytics dashboard and visualizations accelerated the speed with which analysts could share insights across teams. This ease of use also enabled marketers and developers to self-serve analysis. Faster turnaround of insights reduced the time spent on decision-making and accelerated time to market for changes to the digital experience, helping to shorten time to value. The director of analytics engineering at a SaaS organization said: “Without a tool like Optimizely Analytics, we would have to go to data scientists and spend a bunch of time with them. Because they often could be unavailable, the product manager might have to make decisions based on either suboptimal data or on no data at all. So the solution here is to equip them with an easy-to-use tool to build the right dashboard of metrics and quickly query the right metrics.”

“The product team is a beneficiary because it helps shorten the time spent on learning and decision-making. … It helps us to shift our focus to where it should be and make decisions with more intentionality.”

Senior director of product analytics, automotive

Interviewees paired Optimizely Analytics with optimization tests to better understand test results. At the automotive organization, analysts created dashboards in Analytics to see how specific value metrics like lead conversion rate were impacted by optimizations. The senior director of product analytics said, “It’s a huge time saving for us because we just run tests and pull in that data, and it’s distilled right there across our value events.”

30%

Increase in value generated with analyst insights by Year 3

This approach influenced teams at the organization to run optimization tests against Analytics for specific metrics to better understand the levers driving changes in results. The senior director of product analytics said: “Part of our maturity with Optimizely is learning to not just run more experiment tests but to run the right experiment. We’re spending more time building experiments to test for specific cases, so we’re not chasing down insights across multiple tests.”

Another key factor for interviewees was Optimizely’s data security compared to their legacy solution. The director of analytics engineering at a technology organization said: “Optimizely allows us with the current data models we’re exploring to bring in and analyze sensitive data that complies with our privacy security requirements. That wasn’t possible before.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • There are 25 data analysts leveraging Optimizely Analytics, and each contributes $400,000 in revenue to the organization annually.

  • The revenue generated by each employee improves 20% in Year 1 as they apply insights to better target and engage customers, leading to higher order values and additional recurring customer value. By Year 2, the improvement grows to 25%; by Year 3, it increases to 30%.

  • A profit margin of 10% is applied to the revenue results.

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The number of data analysts leveraging Optimizely Analytics.

  • The size of the organization in terms of number of employees, revenue, and profit margin.

  • The level of analysis carried out on data prior to Optimizely Analytics.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $491,000.

Greater Data Analysis Value
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Data analysts Composite 25 25 25
B2 Average annual revenue per employee Composite $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
B3 Increase in value generated from analyst insights (e.g., higher order value, additional recurring customer value) Interviews 20% 25% 30%
B4 Additional value generated annually B1*B2*B3 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000
B5 Profit margin TEI methodology 10% 10% 10%
Bt Greater data analysis value B1*B2*B3*B5 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Btr Greater data analysis value (risk-adjusted)   $160,000 $200,000 $240,000
Three-year total: $600,000 Three-year present value: $491,059
Productivity In Creating Digital Experiences And Content

Evidence and data. The seamless integration of Optimizely One solutions helped to centralize operations for interviewees, enabling them to maximize the bandwidth of creatives and marketing. The assistant VP of digital enablement at an insurance company said: “We’re not having to hire a bunch of new people to manage three or four sites — we can consolidate operations into one authoring team. … When it comes to time savings, we see it as an opportunity to repurpose time for value-added content.” They added that Optimizely’s Content Marketing Platform helped consolidate workflows, with it providing greater visibility into teams’ operations and their content.

Previously, the manufacturing organization had assets sitting in different locations based on team members’ individual workstreams, leading to multiple renditions of a file type appearing on a site. Optimizely Digital Asset Management resolved file issues, the manufacturer’s VP of digital experience said: “We now have one central source of truth maintained by a team. Our CMS users and marketing creative teams are benefiting from Digital Asset Management because they can quickly find the right assets that are approved and integrate those right into the experience.”

“We’re seeing the time it took a content author to build a page in our legacy system was 45 minutes. [With Optimizely], I would say the time it takes a content author to build a page is more like 15 minutes.”

Assistant VP of digital enablement, insurance

Optimizely One’s efficiencies helped interviewees’ developers to create more engaging experiences that they otherwise wouldn’t have bandwidth to address. The principal of digital growth at a leasing organization said: “Optimizely is very flexible for our developers to modify experiences and increase their turnaround time. So if marketing asks for a landing page, they can then quickly deploy that. We have the flexibility and speed to create impact we couldn’t have had otherwise.”

The assistant VP of digital enablement at an insurance company added: “When it’s difficult to maintain content, you don’t make as engaging content; you don’t keep it as refreshed. There are better capabilities we’re starting to employ like content recommendation that help with personalization.” Features like these helped to keep content fresh for customers and required little additional hands-on time from team members.

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • Ten developers work on building digital experiences, allocating half of their time to the work.

  • Productivity in creating experiences accelerates with dynamic CMS templates that are easy to integrate and update, as well as increased optimization testing to validate digital experiences and features. Output improves by 30% in Year 1 and matures to 40% by Year 3.

  • Ten marketers spend half of their time building content for digital experiences. Their productivity increases with Optimizely CMS, particularly around technical work, accelerating by 25% in Year 1 and rising to 35% in Year 3.

  • Fifty marketers use CMP to create content for both digital and nondigital campaigns, while also orchestrating and managing campaign execution and content delivery. They then use CMS to quickly deliver that content at scale. They dedicate 10% of their time toward work specifically within these solutions. Optimizely’s ease of use and flexible capabilities cut their time spent with this work in half.

  • The TEI methodology incorporates the assumption that a group of employees who experience a productivity benefit will rededicate some time to additional work and a portion to nonwork. For this time savings benefit, half of the recouped time goes toward additional work, such as building new digital experiences. The other half of time saved enables employees to take longer breaks or work fewer late shifts, qualitatively making for an improved employee experience.

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The number of developers and time dedicated to building digital experiences.

  • The number of marketers and time spent working on digital experiences and creating content.

  • The types of tools leveraged before adopting Optimizely One.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for employees.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $771,000.

Productivity In Creating Digital Experiences And Content
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Developers working on digital experiences Composite 10 10 10
C2 Percentage of developer time spent on content orchestration Composite 50% 50% 50%
C3 Increased productivity in creating digital experiences Interviews 30% 35% 40%
C4 Fully burdened annual salary for a developer Composite $160,000 $160,000 $160,000
C5 Developer digital experience productivity value C1*C2*C3*C4 $240,000 $280,000 $320,000
C6 Marketers working on content for digital experiences Composite 10 10 10
C7 Percentage of marketer time spent on content orchestration Composite 50% 50% 50%
C8 Increased productivity in creating digital experience content Interviews 25% 30% 35%
C9 Fully burdened annual salary for a marketer Composite $125,000 $125,000 $125,000
C10 Marketer digital experience content productivity value C6*C7*C8*C9 $156,250 $187,500 $218,750
C11 Employees working on content for nondigital experiences Composite 50 50 50
C12 Percentage of time spent working with CMP Composite 10% 10% 10%
C13 Increased content creation productivity Composite 50% 50% 50%
C14 Marketer nondigital experience content productivity value C9*C11*C12*C13 $312,500 $312,500 $312,500
C15 Productivity recapture among employees TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
Ct Productivity in creating digital experiences and content (C5+C10+C14)*C15 $354,375 $390,000 $425,625
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Ctr Productivity in creating digital experiences and content (risk-adjusted)   $283,500 $312,000 $340,500
Three-year total: $936,000 Three-year present value: $771,401
Legacy Solution Cost Savings

Evidence and data. By adopting Optimizely One, interviewees were able to move on from their legacy solutions’ management and/or licensing costs. Some interviewees saw significant cost savings: For the VP of digital experience at a manufacturing organization, the costs of their prior commerce and content management solution were becoming too high to maintain. The interviewee said: “We looked at the cost to continue to maintain that solution: hosting, licensing, ongoing support. We compared that to a SaaS-based solution, and we found we could lower our cost. At the same time, we could improve our agility and customer experience. We based our decision on understanding the customer perspective and the future experiences we needed to deliver.”

“Capability-wise, Optimizely ended up having everything we wanted compared to its competition. It wasn’t simply a cost decision — although the cost was better for us. The capabilities and assessment of it we did put it clearly on top.”

VP of digital experience, manufacturing

For other interviewees, retiring legacy solutions was only part of a larger push to modernize their capabilities. The assistant VP of digital enablement at an insurance organization said: “We’re better positioned with a modern solution that can help us take advantage of things like AI that can bring personalization to content. It’s not just about cost savings so much as being in a better place for growth and taking advantage of strategic opportunities that the technology enables.”

The director of analytics engineering at a SaaS company noted that Optimizely Analytics helped them significantly with compute costs. Their legacy solution was poorly configured, and they had to run dedicated instances to power compute. The interviewee said: “If we’re thinking about our total compute footprint, it’s going down, and we’re going to save money. We’re optimizing our use of compute because we have more control over data in our environment and when we need compute power.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • The legacy solutions the organization plans to phase out total $400,000 in annual costs.

  • Each year, the organization phases out technology that overlaps with an Optimizely One solution, saving one-third of annual costs.

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The number of legacy solutions that the organization plans to phase out.

  • The fees and oversight costs for legacy solutions.

  • The speed with which the organization plans to phase out legacy solutions.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $650,000.

Legacy Solution Cost Savings
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Annual cost for legacy solutions Composite $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
D2 Percentage of costs saved annually Interviews 50% 100% 100%
Dt Legacy solution cost savings D1*D2 $200,000 $400,000 $400,000
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Dtr Legacy solution cost savings (risk-adjusted)   $160,000 $320,000 $320,000
Three-year total: $800,000 Three-year present value: $650,338
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Optimizely AI capabilities streamline operations. Interviewees’ use cases for Optimizely One’s AI tool Opal are in their early stages, but they have been encouraged by their experiences thus far. They found Opal’s ability to generate and format testing plans has streamlined setting up optimizations for features and digital experiences. In addition, querying Opal for dashboard results analysis, testing summarization, and follow-on test ideas has accelerated their analysis of optimization tests. The principal of digital growth at a leasing organization said that Optimizely’s use of agentic AI could unlock further value: “Some of the agents they’re introducing in Opal could be very, very useful. Especially if it comes to the point of being able to handle some of the more menial regular tasks like outputting formatted document summaries of tests that need to be seen by a stakeholder group. If I can get an agent set up that does that kind of thing, I’ll run that agent every week.”

  • Employee experience positivity increases from enhanced operations. Once the interviewees were set up with Optimizely One solutions, their teams were eager to leverage them. The assistant VP of digital enablement at an insurance organization said: “We’ve got multiple business areas saying they want to move our website over to the new CMS platform. They’re knocking on the door, saying, ‘We heard you have this better thing.’” A key driver of excitement was ease of use, with the solutions encouraging self-service among employees. Employees no longer had to wait for engineers or developers to add website features — they could insert them into templates and begin testing. This change reduced tensions around lengthy development timelines, improving relations between teams. Employees also felt more confident about applying updates to digital experiences because of Optimizely’s proprietary Stats Engine, which gives experimenters forward-looking recommendations based on statistical significance. As a result, teams moved forward with stronger belief that they could use these insights to improve key metrics like revenue uplift or conversions.

“We’ve vastly expanded the capabilities of content authors to do work on their own. It’s dramatically reduced the amount of engineering engagement required for small enhancements. Those engineers can focus on more strategic work instead of designing a vanity URL.”

Assistant VP of digital enablement, insurance

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Optimizely One and later realize additional business value, including:

  • Incorporating offline data into Optimizely Analytics to improve customer experiences. Interviewees were interested in incorporating offline events data in Optimizely Analytics to better understand how digital experiences influence audiences beyond what they had been tracking. At the automotive organization, transactions are primarily offline with automobiles, the senior director of product analytics said: “With that use case, we appreciate the power of Optimizely’s Warehouse Native Analytics Solution, especially on the B2B side, where all that data resides. Down the road, we want to tie user engagement data from the digital experience with a lot of our system data and put that integrated data into Optimizely Analytics for analysis.”

  • Greater flexibility in website delivery. Interviewees appreciated that Optimizely One enabled them to architect their websites for a variety of use cases. With the Optimizely CMS, users could mix and match template elements to fit their goals. The VP of digital experience at the manufacturing organization said that they had improved the speed of releases on changes to experiences from one to two per month to a consistent two per month. Tweaks they applied more regularly included the way images are sized, new commerce features, and adding to site navigation.
    Interviewees also discovered how to effectively augment those experiences using optimization tests and personalization in tandem. The principal of digital growth at a leasing organization said: “For team reporting with experimentation tests and personalization, we always have a controlled state in place to measure the difference in incremental impact of a modified experience. We know which users are not in that modified experience, so we can compare revenue outcomes of the two and then normalize that by math with our analytics team.” This level of control gave marketing teams the confidence to modify experiences as necessary.

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Etr Implementation costs $313,728 $0 $0 $0 $313,728 $313,728
Ftr Optimizely One licensing costs $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $900,000 $746,056
Gtr Training costs $0 $240,000 $19,200 $19,200 $278,400 $248,475
  Total costs
(risk-adjusted)
$313,728 $540,000 $319,200 $319,200 $1,492,128 $1,308,259
Implementation Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees had an internal technical team work with Optimizely to help stand up their solutions. Efforts included migrating websites, mapping workflows and content, integrating solutions, importing data to analytics tools, and ensuring that data was flowing between solutions without any issues. The process took place over a few months, and interviewees described it as straightforward and without any surprises.

Modeling and assumptions. Assumed costs for the composite organization are based on the following:

  • Eight employees spend one-fifth of their time over the course of three months supporting implementation of Optimizely One solutions. This team includes developers and marketers testing out the solutions.

  • The blended, fully burdened hourly rate for different teams supporting this implementation is $80.

  • The organization pays $200,000 for a professional services team to support implementation.

Risks. Costs may not be representative of all experiences and will vary among organizations depending on several factors, including:

  • The scale of migration and deployment of the solutions.

  • The number of employees supporting implementation and their hourly rate.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $314,000.

Implementation Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 FTEs supporting implementation of Optimizely One solutions Interviews 8      
E2 Implementation period (months) Interviews 3      
E3 FTE time spent on implementation Interviews 20%      
E4 Blended, fully burdened hourly rate for an FTE Composite $80      
E5 Professional services cost Interviews $200,000      
Et Implementation costs (E1*E2*40*4*E3*E4)+E5 $261,440      
  Risk adjustment ↑20%        
Etr Implementation costs (risk-adjusted)   $313,728      
Three-year total: $313,728 Three-year present value: $313,728
Optimizely One Licensing Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees paid ongoing licensing fees to access Optimizely One’s solutions. Costs were based on various factors, including the number of solutions used and the scale of their operations.

Modeling and assumptions. Assumed costs for the composite organization are based on the size of the composite’s business and digital operations, as well as the organization leveraging each of Optimizely One’s solutions. This results in annual licensing costs of $250,000.

Risks. Costs may not be representative of all experiences and will vary among organizations depending on several factors, including:

  • The scale of usage.

  • The types of Optimizely One solutions at an organization.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $746,000.

Optimizely One Licensing Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Average Optimizely One annual licensing costs Composite $0  $250,000 $250,000 $250,000
Ft Optimizely One licensing costs F1 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000
  Risk adjustment ↑20%        
Ftr Optimizely One licensing costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
Three-year total: $900,000 Three-year present value: $746,056
Training Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that Optimizely One solutions were easy to learn and required little time to familiarize themselves with. Best practices were developed over time after employees developed shorthand to effectively leverage them.

Modeling and assumptions. Assumed costs for the composite organization are based on the following:

  • Users spend 20 hours over the course of their first year with Optimizely One solutions learning how to effectively use them.

  • In subsequent years, an additional 10 employees (either new hires or replacements) each spend 20 hours learning how to use Optimizely One solutions.

  • The blended, fully burdened hourly rate for different teams supporting this implementation is $80.

Risks. Costs may not be representative of all experiences and will vary among organizations depending on several factors, including:

  • The number of employees who will be using Optimizely One solutions and their familiarity with these types of solutions.

  • The hourly rate of employees using these solutions.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $248,000.

Training Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Users of Optimizely One solutions Composite 0 125 10 10
G2 Time spent training on solutions (hours) Interviews 0 20 20 20
G3 Blended, fully burdened hourly rate for an FTE Composite $0 $80 $80 $80
Gt Training costs G1*G2*G3 $0 $200,000 $16,000 $16,000
  Risk adjustment ↑20%        
Gtr Training costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $240,000 $19,200 $19,200
Three-year total: $278,400 Three-year present value: $248,675

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($313,728) ($540,000) ($319,200) ($319,200) ($1,492,128) ($1,308,259)
Total benefits $0 $1,902,620 $2,981,755 $3,923,300 $8,807,675 $7,141,548
Net benefits ($313,728) $1,362,620 $2,662,555 $3,604,100 $7,315,547 $5,833,289
ROI           446%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Optimizely One.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Optimizely One can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Optimizely stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Optimizely One.

Interviews

Interviewed five decision-makers at organizations using Optimizely One to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Supplemental Material

Related Forrester Research

The Impact Of AI On Digital Experience Platforms, Forrester Research, Inc., July 7, 2025

The Digital Experience Platforms Landscape, Q3 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., July 2, 2025

Executive Guide: Digital Experience Platforms, Forrester Research, Inc., June 24, 2025

Appendix C

Endnotes

1 Source: Forrester’s Priorities Survey, 2025.

2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Optimizely and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Optimizely. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Optimizely One based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Optimizely or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Optimizely and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Optimizely make no warranties of any kind.

Optimizely reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Optimizely provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Corey McNair

Published

September 2025