Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Noggin, A Motorola Solutions Company

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Noggin

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Noggin, AUGUST 2025

[CONTENT]

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Noggin, A Motorola Solutions Company

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Noggin

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Noggin, AUGUST 2025

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]

Related Content

Executive Summary

Organizations consistently face risks from crime, severe weather, environmental catastrophes, geopolitical upheaval, and everyday accidents. Besides disrupting key business operations, these events also jeopardize employee and customer safety and threaten to interrupt critical public services. Complex business processes, global supply chains, and a distributed workforce only serve to exacerbate a situation that already necessitates a stressful incident response. The integrated resilience software platform provided by Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, empowers organizations to be better prepared for disruptions, and enable them to communicate and coordinate more effectively in real time during a critical incident, and most importantly, minimize the impact of a crisis.

Noggin’s integrated resilience software platform enables organizations to pivot their resilience approach from a reactive response to a proactive one, by equipping them with tools to anticipate, detect, assess, and respond to disruptive incidents. With the integration and visualization of data from diverse sources (e.g., weather and location data) in real time on a unified dashboard, Noggin enhances organizations’ situational awareness and helps decision-makers make better and faster decisions. Beyond supporting organizations as they navigate disruptions with effective response and recovery, Noggin also strengthens organizational resilience by continuously improving strategies and processes. This helps organizations avoid the reputational damage tied to severe incidents while cementing resilience as a competitive advantage.

Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying the Noggin platform.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Noggin on their organizations.

355%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$1.9M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Noggin. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a conglomerate with 10,000 employees and an annual revenue of $10 billion.

Interviewees said that prior to using Noggin, their organizations lacked a formal and standardized approach to managing incidents, and often relied on manual and piecemeal efforts. Business units operated independently without a coordinated approach, with analysts working manually to link dependencies and update continuity plans on spreadsheets. This caused operational inefficiencies and complicated efforts to identify and promptly alert necessary stakeholders across the organization. Without a Common Operating Picture (COP) to support decision-making, interviewees faced challenges in understanding the full extent of incidents and consolidating holistic response plans to mitigate the full effect of incidents. This was a key barrier to enforcing compliance, which was especially critical for interviewees within the financial services sector.

After the investment in Noggin, the interviewees were able to tap on capabilities and tools to respond to and manage critical events more effectively, thereby safeguarding employees and customers, protecting key assets, and maintaining compliance.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions, worth $1 million. Noggin supports the composite organization in recovering more quickly from unplanned business interruptions that arise from operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, and natural hazards. It does so by consolidating relevant data and insights into a unified view, enabling employees to communicate and react faster to incidents, thereby reducing the impact of unplanned business interruptions.

5%

Percentage reduction in time lost on unplanned business interruption annually, that is attributable to Noggin

  • Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime, totaling $1.2 million. The composite organization is heavily reliant on critical cloud-based IT infrastructure, making it especially vulnerable to incidents that result in IT downtime. With Noggin, the composite organization is able to systematically alert relevant stakeholders based on priority levels and utilize pre-configured response plans to help IT teams work in tandem to resolve the issue efficiently.

20%

Percentage reduction in unplanned IT downtime due to agile response annually, that is attributable to Noggin

  • Improved employee productivity via automation that generates $217,000 in efficiency gains. Before leveraging Noggin, the composite organization relied on manual efforts to create and maintain business continuity plans (BCPs) and business impact analyses (BIAs), raise alerts and notify stakeholders on incidents, as well as to create post-incident reports. Implementing Noggin enables the composite organization to tap on pre-configured templates to create plans that can then be automatically circulated for reviews and approvals. Noggin’s capabilities allow the composite organization to accurately identify and alert relevant stakeholders, which improves incident response time. Additionally, Noggin helps to automatically develop a post-incident report for the composite organization — this not only generates efficiency gains but also feeds into the continuous improvement loop by extracting and summarizing key insights that can be used to improve internal processes.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Improved overall visibility and future impact prediction. Noggin enhances threat visibility by aggregating real-time data from various sources into a centralized dashboard, allowing organizations to detect and monitor emerging risks earlier. Its predictive analytics and scenario modeling tools help to forecast potential impact, enabling proactive planning and faster, more informed decision-making.

  • Improved compliance. By centralizing governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) processes within a single platform, Noggin enhances the composite organization’s compliance to industry standards and regulations. Besides streamlining the creation, reviewing, and tracking of plans and reports to ensure alignment with industry standards and regulatory obligations, capabilities such as automated workflows, real-time reporting, and audit trails make it easier to demonstrate compliance during inspections or reviews. These reduce the risk of penalties and improve accountability across the organization.

  • Enhanced customer experience (CX). Noggin enables the composite organization to drive CX at scale by ensuring faster, more coordinated responses to disruptions, which minimizes service downtime and communication gaps. Its automated workflows and real-time stakeholder notifications help the composite organization maintain transparency and continuity. This boosts trust and satisfaction among customers, especially during critical incidents.

  • Enhanced communications and collaboration. Noggin supports the flow of internal communications by centralizing information sharing and automating stakeholder notifications during incidents. This ensures that the right teams are aligned and informed in real time. Its collaborative workflows and shared dashboards also foster cross-functional coordination, which enables faster decision-making and more effective teamwork across departments.

“Prior to using Noggin, incident response was siloed across the business and no one was centrally managing and escalating incidents. Noggin helps us understand what has been impacted, what that means in the context of the wider business, and share a Common Operating Picture [COP] with responders. This leads to less duplication, greater efficiency, and increased focus in the right place to recover as quickly and efficiently as possible.”

Interim head of operational resilience and business continuity, insurance

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • One-time implementation cost of $82,000. Costs tied to implementation revolve around the internal hours needed for migration and setup, as well as the professional services hours contracted from Noggin.

  • Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees that total $294,000. Annual fees to utilize Noggin are based on the number of user licenses, professional services hours, and SMS credits required. 

  • Ongoing internal solution maintenance and training costs worth $148,000. Internal solution maintenance are required as the composite organization continues to leverage the Noggin platform. As it scales its use of Noggin year over year, there will also be new users onboarded onto the platform who will each require an hour of training.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $2.4 million over three years versus costs of $523,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $1.9 million and an ROI of 355%.

Key Statistics

355%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$2.4M

Benefits PV 

$1.9M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime Improved employee productivity via automation

The Noggin Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Noggin investment
Interviews
Role Industry Region Revenue Employees
Digital systems analyst Airline and aviation Australia $792 million* 1,000
Executive manager, programs and systems Insurance Headquartered in Australia with regional (Australia and New Zealand) operations $8.4 billion* 10,000
Interim head of operational resilience and business continuity Insurance Headquartered in the UK, with global operations $2 billion 5,000
National director, business continuity Beverage sales and distribution Headquartered in the US, with regional (Americas) operations $26 billion 24,000
* Note: Revenue has been converted from AUD to USD using the average currency conversion rate for June 2025.
Key Challenges

Before investing in and deploying Noggin, the interviewees’ organizations relied on a patchwork of legacy systems, manual processes, and standalone tools that required siloed, tedious analyst efforts — which resulted in fragmented and inefficient management of business continuity and critical events.

Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Inefficient legacy systems no longer meet the evolving operational needs of organizations as they scale. Before implementing Noggin, the interviewees’ organizations used outdated and on-premises systems that lacked flexibility and scalability. These legacy platforms were slow and offered limited real-time data processing. The interviewees had to deal with mobile applications that were not user-friendly. Incident management processes were also largely manual, with teams depending on cumbersome spreadsheets and outdated methods that were inefficient.
    The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company noted: “Our previous platform was not as easy to use as compared to Noggin, which has a user-friendly interface. It would also slow down if there was a lot of data on the dashboard. In comparison, Noggin can process large amounts of data seamlessly, which makes the platform smoother and faster.”

“The previous platform was not adaptive or flexible, it’s also an on-premises system that can go down during a system outage. Noggin is cloud-based — which means that it’s always up and running — which is a big advantage for us as we are an airport and can’t be offline. It’s easier to manage, faster, and [offers] real-time [support].”

Digital systems analyst, airline and aviation

  • Noncompliance with new regulations posed significant risk to the organization. Interviewees noted that their organizations operated in highly regulated industries and faced ongoing challenges with staying fully compliant and up to date with regulatory requirements that were continuously evolving. Without a reliable system to ensure compliance, they risked severe consequences such as financial penalties, legal action, and personal accountability for responsible stakeholders.

“Until my team took post, business units were uncoordinated, doing things in isolation, and often noncompliant. There was no joined-up process for incident management and response — they were essentially making it up as they went along.”

Interim head of operational resilience and business continuity, insurance

  • Lack of a formal, coordinated, and integrated approach to incident management. Prior to Noggin, organizations lacked a standardized framework for managing incidents. Business units operated in silos, with little to no coordination across teams. There were no designated subject matter experts (SMEs) to guide the process, and incident-related tasks were often delegated to executive assistants with limited expertise.

“Previously, our incident management lacked formal structure and relied heavily on spreadsheets and separate documents.”

National director of business continuity, beverage sales and distribution

Solution Requirements/Investment Objectives

The interviewees searched for a solution that could:

  • Ensure adherence to operational resilience regulations to maintain trust and avoid penalties.

  • Streamline complex tasks related to managing business continuity and critical incidents, to enhance overall efficiency.

  • Automate work that were previously done manually to generate efficiency gains while improving accuracy.

“We had to select a replacement for our old business continuity system as the legacy application and operating systems were no longer meeting the needs of the business. We also had the upcoming APRA CPS 230 legislation, and we needed to make sure that we had a modern continuity platform that is fit for purpose and able to ensure our compliance with the CPS 230 standard.”

Executive manager of programs and systems, insurance

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a conglomerate with interests across the retail, aviation, and financial sectors. Headquartered in the US with global operations, the firm has an annual revenue of $10 billion and an employee headcount of 10,000.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using Noggin in Year 1, following a three-month implementation period. The initial rollout covers 3% of the workforce and scales to approximately 10% by Year 3.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $10 billion in annual revenue

  • 10,000 employees

  • 300 incidents annually

  • 200 BCPs

  • 500 BIAs

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions $405,000 $405,000 $405,000 $1,215,000 $1,007,175
Btr Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime $466,560 $466,560 $466,560 $1,399,680 $1,160,266
Ctr Improved employee productivity via automation $87,073 $87,073 $87,073 $261,220 $216,538
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $958,633 $958,633 $958,633 $2,875,900 $2,383,979
Cost Avoidance From Reduced Business Interruptions

Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that critical events that arise from operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, and natural hazards resulted in unplanned business interruptions to their organization’s operations. They noted that before leveraging Noggin, their organizations lacked the capabilities to anticipate, prepare for, and efficiently respond to incidents. During the course of an incident, interviewees also struggled to identify the full extent of the business impact and to accurately pinpoint and alert necessary teams to raise a response. Interviewees noted that implementing Noggin enabled them to integrate data across systems for a unified view of incidents and their impact, as well as generate automated alerts to relevant teams based on pre-configured priority levels. This helped the interviewees’ organizations to react faster to resolve incidents, which enabled business operations to resume as promptly as possible and preserve their positive brand reputation.

  • The national director of business continuity at a beverage sales and distribution firm stated: “Noggin is now the centerpiece of our command center from an incident manager perspective for the entire organization. It combines dashboards associated with the current status with our alerts, incidents, and security.”

  • The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company shared: “We would see hundreds of operational, safety, security and operation events per month. Operational and safety events are the most complex to resolve. Investigation for such events usually took hours, with 90% of them getting resolved within two to three hours. Without Noggin, this would have taken more than a day due to the manual coordination that was required.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • A conservative estimate of 13.5 hours of unplanned business interruptions annually, with an average cost of $750,000 per hour.

  • A 5% reduction in time lost on unplanned business interruptions annually, that is attributable to Noggin.

Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include the following:

  • The frequency and severity of unplanned business interruptions may vary across organizations.

  • The hourly cost of unplanned business interruptions may differ based on factors like industries or lines of businesses affected.

  • The potential variance in the reduction in annual hours of unplanned business interruption attributable to Noggin.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1 million.

“Noggin is crucial for our business — it documents everything from BIAs, to BCP exercises, live tests, incidents, threat intelligence, and more. It links all the data to provide a comprehensive view of incidents and their impact, and enables predictive analysis for future impacts. This creates a common operating picture for situational awareness, ensuring everyone has a shared understanding.”

Interim head of operational resilience and business continuity, insurance

“When the operational team knows what’s happening and they are notified in real-time about an issue, they can resolve it faster, which reduces the incidence and severity of delay claims. This also helps to keep our reputation of being a proactive and responsive airport intact.”

Digital systems analyst, airline and aviation

Cost Avoidance From Reduced Business Interruptions
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Average hourly cost of unplanned business interruption due to operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, natural hazards, etc. Composite $750,000 $750,000 $750,000
A2 Average duration of unplanned business interruption annually, due to operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, natural hazards, etc. before Noggin (hours) Composite 13.5 13.5 13.5
A3 Annual cost of unplanned business interruption before Noggin A1*A2 $10,125,000 $10,125,000 $10,125,000
A4 Percentage reduction in unplanned business interruptions annually, attributable to Noggin Composite 5% 5% 5%
At Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions A3*A4 $506,250 $506,250 $506,250
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Atr Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions (risk-adjusted)   $405,000 $405,000 $405,000
Three-year total: $1,215,000 Three-year present value: $1,007,175
Avoided Revenue Loss As A Result Of Reduced IT Downtime

Evidence and data. The interviewees’ organizations operated in highly regulated and mission-critical environments, which depended heavily on robust, cloud-based IT infrastructure. These systems often included hybrid cloud environments, virtualized data centers, real-time transaction processing platforms, and integrated cybersecurity frameworks. Given this reliance, any disruption or downtime in IT services can have significant operational and reputational consequences. Leveraging Noggin enables the composite organization to proactively manage such incidents. The platform activates pre-configured incident response workflows that ensure that IT and operations teams can collaborate seamlessly, respond swiftly, and restore services efficiently — minimizing impact and maintaining business continuity.

  • The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “Large scale incidents happen three to four times a year, with an average IT downtime of half an hour to an hour, though there are exceptions where it can last longer — especially when the situation is out of our control. Without the Noggin platform, I believe the downtime would have taken two to three hours to resolve.”

  • The interim head of operational resilience and business continuity of an insurance firm highlighted: “We had an incident where there was quite a big cyber breach with approximately 9 gigabytes worth of data that was breached [and released] onto the dark web. But the process with Noggin went really well in helping us to resolve and mitigate the impact. In particular, the actual incident response side of it was completely different to what it had been pre-Noggin.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • A conservative estimate of 45 hours of unplanned IT downtime annually with an average of $540,000 of revenue impacted hourly.

  • A 20% reduction in unplanned IT downtime annually that is attributable to Noggin.

  • An estimate of 12% operating margin.

Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include the following:

  • Potential variance in the frequency and severity of unplanned IT downtime.

  • The hourly cost of unplanned IT downtime may differ based on industries.

  • The variance in reduction in unplanned IT downtime that is attributable to Noggin.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.2 million.

“Last year, we had a major power outage that took out our servers and applications. The Noggin platform was very useful as it kicked in immediately to help alert the teams that needed to be aware of the situation in an organized way so that they can work in tandem to resolve the issue.”

Digital systems analyst, airline and aviation

 Interview Spotlight  

Alleviation Of Impact From Global IT Outage Due To Third-Party Vendor System

The digital systems analyst from the airline and aviation sector shared that though they usually manage to resolve incidents within an hour in accordance with their service level agreement (SLA), there are notable exceptions.

One such exception was a global IT outage that occurred in 2024. This event affected organizations across industries and resulted in the disruption of critical services and business operations. The airline and aviation sector was not spared, and the outage led to a breakdown of flight information screens across airports even though flight update information were ready and accessible from its systems.

While the interviewee noted that this outage lasted longer as it was beyond their organization’s control, they were able to use Noggin to quickly identify the issue and get the relevant people across teams to activate a response.

Avoided Revenue Loss As A Result Of Reduced IT Downtime
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Average hourly revenue impacted by unplanned IT downtime Composite $540,000 $540,000 $540,000
B2 Average duration of unplanned IT downtime annually, before Noggin (hours) Composite 45 45 45
B3 Annual revenue loss due to unplanned IT downtime before Noggin B1*B2 $24,300,000 $24,300,000 $24,300,000
B4 Percentage reduction in unplanned IT downtime annually due to agile response, attributable to Noggin Composite 20% 20% 20%
B5 Operating margin TEI standard 12% 12% 12%
Bt Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime B3*B4*B5 $583,200 $583,200 $583,200
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Btr Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime (risk-adjusted)   $466,560 $466,560 $466,560
Three-year total: $1,399,680 Three-year present value: $1,160,266
Improved Employee Productivity Via Automation

Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that prior to adopting Noggin, their organizations were reliant on manual processes to manage critical resilience functions. This included developing and maintaining BCPs and BIAs, issuing incident alerts, notifying stakeholders, and compiling post-incident reports. However, such manual efforts were not only time-consuming but also prone to delays and inconsistencies. This was a key vulnerability in high-stakes sectors such as financial services and aviation, where rapid response and regulatory compliance are paramount.

Implementing Noggin has allowed the interviewees’ organizations to benefit from a centralized, automated platform that streamlines these essential functions. Pre-configured templates enable the rapid creation of BCPs and BIAs, which can be automatically routed for review and approval to ensure alignment with internal policies and external regulatory standards.

Noggin also enhances incident response by accurately identifying and notifying the right stakeholders based on pre-defined roles, escalation paths, and the severity of impact. This capability is especially critical in environments where downtime can disrupt operations, such as financial transactions or airfield operations, that can lead to cascading effects on customers and partners.

Furthermore, Noggin automates the generation of post-incident reports, capturing key metrics and insights that feed into a continuous improvement cycle. These insights refine operational processes, strengthen risk mitigation strategies, and ensure compliance with audit and reporting requirements. Beyond safeguarding the reputation and positive brand image of the interviewees’ organizations, Noggin is also a vital enabler of resilience, which fosters competitive advantage for organizations — especially during periods of uncertainty and volatility.

  • The executive manager of programs and systems at an insurance firm noted: “Our BCPs are reviewed and reapproved on an annual cycle. Previously, BCPs would have to be extracted into PowerPoint or PDF, sent via email, receive an approval response via email, and then wait for the system to be updated to say it’s approved. Now, through automated notifications, the approver will get a notification, and they can just hit approve and then [the necessary process will] flow through into the system. Each part of the extraction and review step had to be conducted manually and now, it’s automated and faster. This means that a process that used to take days might be completed within a day or a couple of hours.”

  • The national director of business continuity at a beverage sales and distribution firm shared: “I can go in and create an incident now within 10 seconds. With Noggin, all you have to do is to fill out a form which helps to standardize all the information we are looking for in an incident. Whereas before, there was a whole manual process needed to notify employees. We may have to send employees an email, but it was kind of an unstructured email with information that was missing, which causes delays with significant back and forth. Hence, the data quality and incident response time has improved dramatically with Noggin.”

  • The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “Another feature that we find helpful is that once an incident is closed, the Noggin platform can automatically generate an incident report for us by using a specific template with the click of a button. It extracts and summarizes all the information that was recorded during the incident, which can be shared with the leadership team, for compliance, etc. The automation of the incident report saves us a lot of time.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • An average of 200 BCPs and 500 BIAs must be reviewed and updated as part of an annual cycle.

  • Before using Noggin, it previously needed two hours to review and maintain a BCP or BIA.

  • Before using Noggin, there were 300 incidents annually with an average of two hours in incident response time.

  • It needs a total of 300 post-incident reports annually which correspond to the number of incidents annually.

  • Before using Noggin, it needed four hours to create a post-incident report.

  • The average hourly salary of a business continuity manager is $67.

Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include the following:

  • The number of BCPs and BIAs needed to be reviewed and updated may vary based on the industry and organization size.

  • The number of incidents, and hence, post-incident reports may also differ based on the industry and line of business.

  • The level of automation that organizations have in place before using Noggin.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $217,000.

85%

Percentage reduction in time needed to review and update a BCP or BIA

95%

Percentage reduction in incident response time

94%

Percentage reduction in time needed to create a post-incident report

Improved Employee Productivity Via Automation
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Average number of BCPs Composite 200 200 200
C2 Average number of BIAs Composite 500 500 500
C3 Average time needed to review and update a BCP/BIA before Noggin (hours) Composite 2 2 2
C4 Percentage reduction in time needed to review and update a BCP/BIA with Noggin (hours) Composite 85% 85% 85%
C5 Time saved from reviewing and updating BCPs and BIAs annually (hours) (C1+C2)*C3*C4 1,190 1,190 1,190
C6 Fully loaded hourly salary of a business continuity manager TEI standard $67 $67 $67
C7 Productivity recapture rate TEI standard 50% 50% 50%
C8 Subtotal: Improved productivity in reviewing and updating BCPs and BIAs C5*C6*C7 $39,865 $39,865 $39,865
C9 Average number of incidents annually Composite 300 300 300
C10 Average incident response time before Noggin (hours) Composite 2 2 2
C11 Percentage reduction in incident response time with Noggin Composite 95% 95% 95%
C12 Time saved in incident response time annually (hours) C9*C10*C11 570 570 570
C13 Subtotal: Improvement in incident response time C6*C7*C12 $19,095 $19,095 $19,095
C14 Annual number of post-incident reports needed C9 300 300 300
C15 Average time needed to create a post-incident report before Noggin (hours) Composite 4 4 4
C16 Percentage reduction in time needed to create a post-incident report with Noggin Composite 94% 94% 94%
C17 Time saved from creating a post-incident report annually (hours) C14*C15*C16 1,128 1,128 1,128
C18 Subtotal: Improved post-incident reporting via automation C6*C7*C17 $37,788 $37,788 $37,788
Ct Improved employee productivity via automation C8+C13+C18 $96,748 $96,748 $96,748
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ctr Improved employee productivity via automation (risk-adjusted)   $87,073 $87,073 $87,073
Three-year total: $261,220 Three-year present value: $216,538
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Improved overall visibility and future impact prediction. Through its integrated threat intelligence and situational awareness capabilities, Noggin consolidates data from multiple internal and external sources (e.g., operational systems, weather feeds, cybersecurity alerts, and regulatory updates) into a unified and visualized dashboard. This real-time visibility allowed the interviewees’ organizations to detect early warning signs of potential disruptions. Additionally, Noggin’s analytics and scenario modeling tools help forecast the potential impact of these threats, enabling teams to simulate outcomes, prioritize response actions, and refine mitigation strategies before incidents escalate.
    The national director of business continuity at a beverage sales and distribution firm noted: “With Noggin, the whole incident reporting process is all standardized with all the rules and the requirements for incident reporting built into the system. This means I can look at my Noggin app and I can tell exactly what incidents are happening in the organization, anywhere in the world. This gives me a level of visibility I never had before.”

  • Improved compliance. Noggin plays a critical role in helping the interviewees’ organizations strengthen and streamline their compliance posture across regulatory, operational, and industry-specific standards. Through the centralization of compliance-related data and workflows, Noggin enabled organizations to maintain up-to-date documentation, track regulatory obligations, and automate audit trails. Its configurable templates and checklists ensured that BCPs, BIAs, and incident response protocols aligned with regulatory frameworks. Moreover, built-in review and approval workflows within the platform ensured accountability and traceability, which reduced the risk of noncompliance and enhanced readiness for audits and regulatory reviews. This also goes toward protecting the reputation of the interviewees’ organizations as compliant and reliable.
    The interim head of operational resilience and business continuity of an insurance firm said: “Noggin serves as the single source of truth for critical systems and applications. It has transformed us from being undocumented and noncompliant to becoming fully compliant within a year, meeting all regulatory requirements and positioning us strongly for FCA audits.”

  • Enhanced CX. Interviewees shared that Noggin has helped them to elevate their organization’s CX by ensuring operational resilience and seamless communication during disruptions. By automating incident response workflows and enabling real-time stakeholder notifications, Noggin minimized service interruptions and ensured customers were kept informed throughout the incident lifecycle. This transparency builds trust and reduces frustration, especially in high-impact sectors like financial services and aviation where delays or outages can significantly affect customer satisfaction.
    The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “When we can perform our duties in time and proactively, it improves passenger experience in the airport as they are able to navigate efficiently. We get a lot of positive feedback on this.”

  • Enhanced communications and collaboration. Noggin provided a centralized platform where teams could access real-time information, updates, and action plans during both routine operations and critical incidents, which is key to enhancing internal communications and driving collaboration. It streamlined communication through automated alerts, role-based notifications, and shared dashboards, which ensured that all relevant stakeholders are aligned and informed without delays or miscommunication. The platform’s collaborative workflows allowed cross-functional teams such as IT, operations, compliance, and executive leadership to coordinate seamlessly, assign tasks, and track progress in a transparent environment. This not only accelerated decision-making but also fostered a culture of accountability and teamwork — thereby improving organizational agility and response effectiveness.
    The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “The Noggin platform allows for the integration of other applications such as Power BI. We also integrated Microsoft Office 365 so that when critical incidents happen, we are able to chat directly and send a meeting invite within the Noggin platform itself. This helps us to collaborate better and faster to resolve the incident.”


Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Noggin and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Allows integration with other systems. The digital systems analyst from an airline and aviation company that we interviewed highlighted Noggin’s flexibility in integrating with a transport monitoring system via API. This system uses bus-mounted sensors to capture real-time data on passenger activity and safety conditions. Once incidents on these transportation linkages were detected, Noggin would automatically create safety events, notify the safety team, and enable prompt response. The integration also supports task management features like due dates and reminders to ensure timely follow-up.

  • Customization and scalability based on evolving business needs. The interim head of operational resilience and business continuity of an insurance firm  explained how their initial use of Noggin centered around business continuity and incident management. As their business needs evolved over the years, however, they have scaled the use of Noggin by building and customizing additional functionalities such as mass notification, threat intelligence, and syncing contacts. By leveraging the mass notification capability, the interviewees’ organizations have been able to work around the limitations in their HR system to raise communications lines and integrate threat intelligence feeds more effectively.

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

“We are constantly adding and integrating new things to the Noggin system. We are currently working on integrating a third-party system that tracks the sensors and data on transport vehicles as they move about. This will help our safety team a lot as safety events can now be recorded in real time. For example, if a vehicle has a collision, the sensor triggers an alarm which is received by the Noggin system, and this creates a safety event within the system that automatically alerts the safety team.”

Digital systems analyst, airline and aviation

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Dtr One-time implementation cost $81,576 $0 $0 $0 $81,576 $81,576
Etr Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees $0 $101,750 $118,416 $138,290 $358,456 $294,264
Ftr Ongoing internal costs associated with solution maintenance and training $0 $57,486 $59,433 $61,575 $178,494 $147,640
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $81,576 $159,236 $177,849 $199,865 $618,526 $523,480
One-Time Implementation Cost

Evidence and data. Interviewees described that the adoption process took up to six months, including migrating data from the old system, where they worked with Noggin to migrate data and configure the platform with the essential features needed to get started. The initial implementation fee is charged as professional service hours.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It requires 200 hours of professional services from Noggin for initial migration and setup.

  • It requires two project managers, four product managers, and one business continuity manager to facilitate implementation.

  • A total of 104 internal hours are needed for the initial migration and setup based on the interviewees’ estimate.

Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this cost include the following:

  • The duration of professional services needed from Noggin varies by the complexity of the organization’s requirements.

  • The number of internal project managers, product managers, and business continuity managers involved depends on the organization’s size and vertical(s).

  • The time needed from the internal project managers, product managers, and business continuity managers varies by the complexity of the organization’s requirements.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $82,000.

One-Time Implementation Cost
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Average duration of professional services needed from Noggin for migration and setup (hours) Composite 200      
D2 Average cost per hour for professional services from Noggin Composite $155      
D3 Subtotal: Total cost for professional services needed from Noggin for migration and setup D1*D2 $31,000      
D4 Project managers involved in migration and setup Composite 2      
D5 Product managers involved in migration and setup Composite 4      
D6 Business continuity managers involved in migration and setup Composite 1      
D7 Total internal time needed for migration and setup (hours) Composite 104      
D8 Fully loaded hourly salary of a project manager TEI standard $48      
D9 Fully loaded hourly salary of a product manager TEI standard $63      
D10 Subtotal: Total internal costs associated with migration and set-up ((D4*D8)+(D5*D9)+(D6*C6))*D7 $43,160      
Dt One-time implementation cost D3+D10 $74,160 $0 $0 $0
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Dtr One-time implementation cost (risk-adjusted)   $81,576 $0 $0 $0
Three-year total: $81,576 Three-year present value: $81,576
Licensing, Professional Service, And Communication-Related Fees

Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that ongoing licensing fees were charged based on the number of platform users. In addition, annual training and support services from Noggin incur extra professional services fees, typically billed by the hour. Organizations also paid separately for the use of SMS to send notifications and communications through the platform.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It starts with 300 full users who have access to all features and functionalities. This number increases by 3% per year.

  • From Year 2 onward, it expands the usage to 315 lite users and expands to a ratio of full to lite users at 1:2 by Year 3.

  • It uses 100 additional professional hours annually.

  • It requires a total of 5,000 SMS messages annually.

Risks. Risks that could affect the realization of this cost include the following:

  • The number and type of user licenses may vary depending on the specific capabilities required by different employee groups.

  • The additional time needed for processional services may vary by the organization’s size and verticals.

  • The number of SMS messages required may vary depending on the number of critical incidents and employee size of the organization.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $294,000.

“The introduction of the lite user license has helped us give flexible access to more people who only need the basic features. We have 550 full user licenses currently and 450 lite user licenses. The number of licenses we need has grown year on year as we expand access to more people.”

Digital systems analyst, airline and aviation

Licensing, Professional Service, And Communication-Related Fees
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Full users Composite   300 315 331
E2 Lite users Composite   0 315 662
E3 Annual cost per full user license Interviews   $240 $264 $290
E4 Annual cost per lite user license Interviews   $11.52 $12.67 $13.94
E5 Subtotal: Annual licensing cost (E1*E3)+(E2*E4)   $72,000 $87,151 $105,218
E6 Time needed for professional services annually (hours) Composite   100 100 100
E7 Subtotal: Annual professional services fees E6*D2   $15,500 $15,500 $15,500
E8 SMS credits purchased annually Composite   5,000 5,000 5,000
E9 Average cost per SMS credit Interviews   $1 $1 $1
E10 Subtotal: Annual fees related to communication/SMS E8*E9   $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Et Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees E5+E7+E10 $0 $92,500 $107,651 $125,718
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Etr Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees (risk-adjusted)   $0 $101,750 $118,416 $138,290
Three-year total: $358,456 Three-year present value: $294,264
Ongoing Internal Costs Associated With Solution Maintenance And Training

Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that the platform required minimal internal effort to maintain and operate. Most interviewees said their organization subscribed to annual training sessions, particularly to onboard new users and ensure continued effective use of the system.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • A team of three project managers each need 240 hours annually for maintenance.

  • Each new user takes one hour for onboarding.

Risks. Risks that could affect the realization of this cost include the following:

  • The number of project managers involved in maintenance may vary based on the size of the organization.

  • The time needed for maintenance may vary depending on the complexity and volume of reports.

  • The number of new users per year may vary based on the size of the organization and its evolving needs.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $148,000.

“We have an annual training subscription with Noggin, so that gives me a certain amount of flexibility… it’s limited to about one or two admin training slots a year.”

Interim head of operational resilience and business continuity, insurance

“We have a recorded 30-minute learning session, which will give new users an idea on how to use the platform.”

Digital systems analyst, airline and aviation

Ongoing Internal Costs Associated With Solution Maintenance And Training
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Project managers needed to maintain solution Composite   3 3 3
F2 Time needed to maintain solution annually (hours) Composite   240 240 240
F3 Subtotal: Annual costs associated with internal solution maintenance F1*F2*D8   $34,560 $34,560 $34,560
F4 Average time needed for onboarding a new user (hours) Composite   1 1 1
F5 Total time needed to train new users annually (E1(new users)+E2(new users))*F4   300 330 363
F6 Average fully loaded hourly salary of an employee who needs training Composite   $59 $59 $59
F7 Subtotal: Annual costs associated with training new users F5*F6   $17,700 $19,470 $21,417
Ft Ongoing internal costs associated with solution maintenance and training F3+F7   $52,260 $54,030 $55,977
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Ftr Ongoing internal costs associated with solution maintenance and training (risk-adjusted)   $0 $57,486 $59,433 $61,575
Three-year total: $178,494 Three-year present value: $147,640

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($81,576) ($159,236) ($177,849) ($199,865) ($618,526) ($523,480)
Total benefits $0 $958,633 $958,633 $958,633 $2,875,900 $2,383,979
Net benefits ($81,576) $799,397 $780,784 $758,769 $2,257,374 $1,860,499
ROI           355%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Noggin.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Noggin can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Noggin stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Noggin.

Interviews

Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Noggin to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Related Content

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, make no warranties of any kind.

Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Noggin provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Amelia Lau, SiDing Wang

Published

August 2025