Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Noggin
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Noggin, AUGUST 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Noggin, AUGUST 2025
Organizations consistently face risks from crime, severe weather, environmental catastrophes, geopolitical upheaval, and everyday accidents. Besides disrupting key business operations, these events also jeopardize employee and customer safety and threaten to interrupt critical public services. Complex business processes, global supply chains, and a distributed workforce only serve to exacerbate a situation that already necessitates a stressful incident response. The integrated resilience software platform provided by Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, empowers organizations to be better prepared for disruptions, and enable them to communicate and coordinate more effectively in real time during a critical incident, and most importantly, minimize the impact of a crisis.
Noggin’s integrated resilience software platform enables organizations to pivot their resilience approach from a reactive response to a proactive one, by equipping them with tools to anticipate, detect, assess, and respond to disruptive incidents. With the integration and visualization of data from diverse sources (e.g., weather and location data) in real time on a unified dashboard, Noggin enhances organizations’ situational awareness and helps decision-makers make better and faster decisions. Beyond supporting organizations as they navigate disruptions with effective response and recovery, Noggin also strengthens organizational resilience by continuously improving strategies and processes. This helps organizations avoid the reputational damage tied to severe incidents while cementing resilience as a competitive advantage.
Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying the Noggin platform.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Noggin on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Noggin. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a conglomerate with 10,000 employees and an annual revenue of $10 billion.
Interviewees said that prior to using Noggin, their organizations lacked a formal and standardized approach to managing incidents, and often relied on manual and piecemeal efforts. Business units operated independently without a coordinated approach, with analysts working manually to link dependencies and update continuity plans on spreadsheets. This caused operational inefficiencies and complicated efforts to identify and promptly alert necessary stakeholders across the organization. Without a Common Operating Picture (COP) to support decision-making, interviewees faced challenges in understanding the full extent of incidents and consolidating holistic response plans to mitigate the full effect of incidents. This was a key barrier to enforcing compliance, which was especially critical for interviewees within the financial services sector.
After the investment in Noggin, the interviewees were able to tap on capabilities and tools to respond to and manage critical events more effectively, thereby safeguarding employees and customers, protecting key assets, and maintaining compliance.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions, worth $1 million. Noggin supports the composite organization in recovering more quickly from unplanned business interruptions that arise from operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, and natural hazards. It does so by consolidating relevant data and insights into a unified view, enabling employees to communicate and react faster to incidents, thereby reducing the impact of unplanned business interruptions.
Percentage reduction in time lost on unplanned business interruption annually, that is attributable to Noggin
Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime, totaling $1.2 million. The composite organization is heavily reliant on critical cloud-based IT infrastructure, making it especially vulnerable to incidents that result in IT downtime. With Noggin, the composite organization is able to systematically alert relevant stakeholders based on priority levels and utilize pre-configured response plans to help IT teams work in tandem to resolve the issue efficiently.
Percentage reduction in unplanned IT downtime due to agile response annually, that is attributable to Noggin
Improved employee productivity via automation that generates $217,000 in efficiency gains. Before leveraging Noggin, the composite organization relied on manual efforts to create and maintain business continuity plans (BCPs) and business impact analyses (BIAs), raise alerts and notify stakeholders on incidents, as well as to create post-incident reports. Implementing Noggin enables the composite organization to tap on pre-configured templates to create plans that can then be automatically circulated for reviews and approvals. Noggin’s capabilities allow the composite organization to accurately identify and alert relevant stakeholders, which improves incident response time. Additionally, Noggin helps to automatically develop a post-incident report for the composite organization — this not only generates efficiency gains but also feeds into the continuous improvement loop by extracting and summarizing key insights that can be used to improve internal processes.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Improved overall visibility and future impact prediction. Noggin enhances threat visibility by aggregating real-time data from various sources into a centralized dashboard, allowing organizations to detect and monitor emerging risks earlier. Its predictive analytics and scenario modeling tools help to forecast potential impact, enabling proactive planning and faster, more informed decision-making.
Improved compliance. By centralizing governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) processes within a single platform, Noggin enhances the composite organization’s compliance to industry standards and regulations. Besides streamlining the creation, reviewing, and tracking of plans and reports to ensure alignment with industry standards and regulatory obligations, capabilities such as automated workflows, real-time reporting, and audit trails make it easier to demonstrate compliance during inspections or reviews. These reduce the risk of penalties and improve accountability across the organization.
Enhanced customer experience (CX). Noggin enables the composite organization to drive CX at scale by ensuring faster, more coordinated responses to disruptions, which minimizes service downtime and communication gaps. Its automated workflows and real-time stakeholder notifications help the composite organization maintain transparency and continuity. This boosts trust and satisfaction among customers, especially during critical incidents.
Enhanced communications and collaboration. Noggin supports the flow of internal communications by centralizing information sharing and automating stakeholder notifications during incidents. This ensures that the right teams are aligned and informed in real time. Its collaborative workflows and shared dashboards also foster cross-functional coordination, which enables faster decision-making and more effective teamwork across departments.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
One-time implementation cost of $82,000. Costs tied to implementation revolve around the internal hours needed for migration and setup, as well as the professional services hours contracted from Noggin.
Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees that total $294,000. Annual fees to utilize Noggin are based on the number of user licenses, professional services hours, and SMS credits required.
Ongoing internal solution maintenance and training costs worth $148,000. Internal solution maintenance are required as the composite organization continues to leverage the Noggin platform. As it scales its use of Noggin year over year, there will also be new users onboarded onto the platform who will each require an hour of training.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $2.4 million over three years versus costs of $523,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $1.9 million and an ROI of 355%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
| Role | Industry | Region | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital systems analyst | Airline and aviation | Australia | $792 million* | 1,000 |
| Executive manager, programs and systems | Insurance | Headquartered in Australia with regional (Australia and New Zealand) operations | $8.4 billion* | 10,000 |
| Interim head of operational resilience and business continuity | Insurance | Headquartered in the UK, with global operations | $2 billion | 5,000 |
| National director, business continuity | Beverage sales and distribution | Headquartered in the US, with regional (Americas) operations | $26 billion | 24,000 |
| * Note: Revenue has been converted from AUD to USD using the average currency conversion rate for June 2025. | ||||
Before investing in and deploying Noggin, the interviewees’ organizations relied on a patchwork of legacy systems, manual processes, and standalone tools that required siloed, tedious analyst efforts — which resulted in fragmented and inefficient management of business continuity and critical events.
Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Inefficient legacy systems no longer meet the evolving operational needs of organizations as they scale. Before implementing Noggin, the interviewees’ organizations used outdated and on-premises systems that lacked flexibility and scalability. These legacy platforms were slow and offered limited real-time data processing. The interviewees had to deal with mobile applications that were not user-friendly. Incident management processes were also largely manual, with teams depending on cumbersome spreadsheets and outdated methods that were inefficient.
The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company noted: “Our previous platform was not as easy to use as compared to Noggin, which has a user-friendly interface. It would also slow down if there was a lot of data on the dashboard. In comparison, Noggin can process large amounts of data seamlessly, which makes the platform smoother and faster.”
Noncompliance with new regulations posed significant risk to the organization. Interviewees noted that their organizations operated in highly regulated industries and faced ongoing challenges with staying fully compliant and up to date with regulatory requirements that were continuously evolving. Without a reliable system to ensure compliance, they risked severe consequences such as financial penalties, legal action, and personal accountability for responsible stakeholders.
Lack of a formal, coordinated, and integrated approach to incident management. Prior to Noggin, organizations lacked a standardized framework for managing incidents. Business units operated in silos, with little to no coordination across teams. There were no designated subject matter experts (SMEs) to guide the process, and incident-related tasks were often delegated to executive assistants with limited expertise.
The interviewees searched for a solution that could:
Ensure adherence to operational resilience regulations to maintain trust and avoid penalties.
Streamline complex tasks related to managing business continuity and critical incidents, to enhance overall efficiency.
Automate work that were previously done manually to generate efficiency gains while improving accuracy.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization is a conglomerate with interests across the retail, aviation, and financial sectors. Headquartered in the US with global operations, the firm has an annual revenue of $10 billion and an employee headcount of 10,000.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using Noggin in Year 1, following a three-month implementation period. The initial rollout covers 3% of the workforce and scales to approximately 10% by Year 3.
$10 billion in annual revenue
10,000 employees
300 incidents annually
200 BCPs
500 BIAs
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions | $405,000 | $405,000 | $405,000 | $1,215,000 | $1,007,175 |
| Btr | Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime | $466,560 | $466,560 | $466,560 | $1,399,680 | $1,160,266 |
| Ctr | Improved employee productivity via automation | $87,073 | $87,073 | $87,073 | $261,220 | $216,538 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $958,633 | $958,633 | $958,633 | $2,875,900 | $2,383,979 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that critical events that arise from operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, and natural hazards resulted in unplanned business interruptions to their organization’s operations. They noted that before leveraging Noggin, their organizations lacked the capabilities to anticipate, prepare for, and efficiently respond to incidents. During the course of an incident, interviewees also struggled to identify the full extent of the business impact and to accurately pinpoint and alert necessary teams to raise a response. Interviewees noted that implementing Noggin enabled them to integrate data across systems for a unified view of incidents and their impact, as well as generate automated alerts to relevant teams based on pre-configured priority levels. This helped the interviewees’ organizations to react faster to resolve incidents, which enabled business operations to resume as promptly as possible and preserve their positive brand reputation.
The national director of business continuity at a beverage sales and distribution firm stated: “Noggin is now the centerpiece of our command center from an incident manager perspective for the entire organization. It combines dashboards associated with the current status with our alerts, incidents, and security.”
The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company shared: “We would see hundreds of operational, safety, security and operation events per month. Operational and safety events are the most complex to resolve. Investigation for such events usually took hours, with 90% of them getting resolved within two to three hours. Without Noggin, this would have taken more than a day due to the manual coordination that was required.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
A conservative estimate of 13.5 hours of unplanned business interruptions annually, with an average cost of $750,000 per hour.
A 5% reduction in time lost on unplanned business interruptions annually, that is attributable to Noggin.
Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include the following:
The frequency and severity of unplanned business interruptions may vary across organizations.
The hourly cost of unplanned business interruptions may differ based on factors like industries or lines of businesses affected.
The potential variance in the reduction in annual hours of unplanned business interruption attributable to Noggin.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Average hourly cost of unplanned business interruption due to operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, natural hazards, etc. | Composite | $750,000 | $750,000 | $750,000 | |
| A2 | Average duration of unplanned business interruption annually, due to operational disruptions, workplace safety incidents, natural hazards, etc. before Noggin (hours) | Composite | 13.5 | 13.5 | 13.5 | |
| A3 | Annual cost of unplanned business interruption before Noggin | A1*A2 | $10,125,000 | $10,125,000 | $10,125,000 | |
| A4 | Percentage reduction in unplanned business interruptions annually, attributable to Noggin | Composite | 5% | 5% | 5% | |
| At | Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions | A3*A4 | $506,250 | $506,250 | $506,250 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Atr | Cost avoidance from reduced business interruptions (risk-adjusted) | $405,000 | $405,000 | $405,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,215,000 | Three-year present value: $1,007,175 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees’ organizations operated in highly regulated and mission-critical environments, which depended heavily on robust, cloud-based IT infrastructure. These systems often included hybrid cloud environments, virtualized data centers, real-time transaction processing platforms, and integrated cybersecurity frameworks. Given this reliance, any disruption or downtime in IT services can have significant operational and reputational consequences. Leveraging Noggin enables the composite organization to proactively manage such incidents. The platform activates pre-configured incident response workflows that ensure that IT and operations teams can collaborate seamlessly, respond swiftly, and restore services efficiently — minimizing impact and maintaining business continuity.
The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “Large scale incidents happen three to four times a year, with an average IT downtime of half an hour to an hour, though there are exceptions where it can last longer — especially when the situation is out of our control. Without the Noggin platform, I believe the downtime would have taken two to three hours to resolve.”
The interim head of operational resilience and business continuity of an insurance firm highlighted: “We had an incident where there was quite a big cyber breach with approximately 9 gigabytes worth of data that was breached [and released] onto the dark web. But the process with Noggin went really well in helping us to resolve and mitigate the impact. In particular, the actual incident response side of it was completely different to what it had been pre-Noggin.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
A conservative estimate of 45 hours of unplanned IT downtime annually with an average of $540,000 of revenue impacted hourly.
A 20% reduction in unplanned IT downtime annually that is attributable to Noggin.
An estimate of 12% operating margin.
Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include the following:
Potential variance in the frequency and severity of unplanned IT downtime.
The hourly cost of unplanned IT downtime may differ based on industries.
The variance in reduction in unplanned IT downtime that is attributable to Noggin.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.2 million.
Alleviation Of Impact From Global IT Outage Due To Third-Party Vendor System
The digital systems analyst from the airline and aviation sector shared that though they usually manage to resolve incidents within an hour in accordance with their service level agreement (SLA), there are notable exceptions.
One such exception was a global IT outage that occurred in 2024. This event affected organizations across industries and resulted in the disruption of critical services and business operations. The airline and aviation sector was not spared, and the outage led to a breakdown of flight information screens across airports even though flight update information were ready and accessible from its systems.
While the interviewee noted that this outage lasted longer as it was beyond their organization’s control, they were able to use Noggin to quickly identify the issue and get the relevant people across teams to activate a response.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Average hourly revenue impacted by unplanned IT downtime | Composite | $540,000 | $540,000 | $540,000 | |
| B2 | Average duration of unplanned IT downtime annually, before Noggin (hours) | Composite | 45 | 45 | 45 | |
| B3 | Annual revenue loss due to unplanned IT downtime before Noggin | B1*B2 | $24,300,000 | $24,300,000 | $24,300,000 | |
| B4 | Percentage reduction in unplanned IT downtime annually due to agile response, attributable to Noggin | Composite | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| B5 | Operating margin | TEI standard | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| Bt | Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime | B3*B4*B5 | $583,200 | $583,200 | $583,200 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Btr | Avoided revenue loss as a result of reduced IT downtime (risk-adjusted) | $466,560 | $466,560 | $466,560 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,399,680 | Three-year present value: $1,160,266 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that prior to adopting Noggin, their organizations were reliant on manual processes to manage critical resilience functions. This included developing and maintaining BCPs and BIAs, issuing incident alerts, notifying stakeholders, and compiling post-incident reports. However, such manual efforts were not only time-consuming but also prone to delays and inconsistencies. This was a key vulnerability in high-stakes sectors such as financial services and aviation, where rapid response and regulatory compliance are paramount.
Implementing Noggin has allowed the interviewees’ organizations to benefit from a centralized, automated platform that streamlines these essential functions. Pre-configured templates enable the rapid creation of BCPs and BIAs, which can be automatically routed for review and approval to ensure alignment with internal policies and external regulatory standards.
Noggin also enhances incident response by accurately identifying and notifying the right stakeholders based on pre-defined roles, escalation paths, and the severity of impact. This capability is especially critical in environments where downtime can disrupt operations, such as financial transactions or airfield operations, that can lead to cascading effects on customers and partners.
Furthermore, Noggin automates the generation of post-incident reports, capturing key metrics and insights that feed into a continuous improvement cycle. These insights refine operational processes, strengthen risk mitigation strategies, and ensure compliance with audit and reporting requirements. Beyond safeguarding the reputation and positive brand image of the interviewees’ organizations, Noggin is also a vital enabler of resilience, which fosters competitive advantage for organizations — especially during periods of uncertainty and volatility.
The executive manager of programs and systems at an insurance firm noted: “Our BCPs are reviewed and reapproved on an annual cycle. Previously, BCPs would have to be extracted into PowerPoint or PDF, sent via email, receive an approval response via email, and then wait for the system to be updated to say it’s approved. Now, through automated notifications, the approver will get a notification, and they can just hit approve and then [the necessary process will] flow through into the system. Each part of the extraction and review step had to be conducted manually and now, it’s automated and faster. This means that a process that used to take days might be completed within a day or a couple of hours.”
The national director of business continuity at a beverage sales and distribution firm shared: “I can go in and create an incident now within 10 seconds. With Noggin, all you have to do is to fill out a form which helps to standardize all the information we are looking for in an incident. Whereas before, there was a whole manual process needed to notify employees. We may have to send employees an email, but it was kind of an unstructured email with information that was missing, which causes delays with significant back and forth. Hence, the data quality and incident response time has improved dramatically with Noggin.”
The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “Another feature that we find helpful is that once an incident is closed, the Noggin platform can automatically generate an incident report for us by using a specific template with the click of a button. It extracts and summarizes all the information that was recorded during the incident, which can be shared with the leadership team, for compliance, etc. The automation of the incident report saves us a lot of time.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
An average of 200 BCPs and 500 BIAs must be reviewed and updated as part of an annual cycle.
Before using Noggin, it previously needed two hours to review and maintain a BCP or BIA.
Before using Noggin, there were 300 incidents annually with an average of two hours in incident response time.
It needs a total of 300 post-incident reports annually which correspond to the number of incidents annually.
Before using Noggin, it needed four hours to create a post-incident report.
The average hourly salary of a business continuity manager is $67.
Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include the following:
The number of BCPs and BIAs needed to be reviewed and updated may vary based on the industry and organization size.
The number of incidents, and hence, post-incident reports may also differ based on the industry and line of business.
The level of automation that organizations have in place before using Noggin.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $217,000.
Percentage reduction in time needed to review and update a BCP or BIA
Percentage reduction in incident response time
Percentage reduction in time needed to create a post-incident report
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Average number of BCPs | Composite | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
| C2 | Average number of BIAs | Composite | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
| C3 | Average time needed to review and update a BCP/BIA before Noggin (hours) | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| C4 | Percentage reduction in time needed to review and update a BCP/BIA with Noggin (hours) | Composite | 85% | 85% | 85% | |
| C5 | Time saved from reviewing and updating BCPs and BIAs annually (hours) | (C1+C2)*C3*C4 | 1,190 | 1,190 | 1,190 | |
| C6 | Fully loaded hourly salary of a business continuity manager | TEI standard | $67 | $67 | $67 | |
| C7 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| C8 | Subtotal: Improved productivity in reviewing and updating BCPs and BIAs | C5*C6*C7 | $39,865 | $39,865 | $39,865 | |
| C9 | Average number of incidents annually | Composite | 300 | 300 | 300 | |
| C10 | Average incident response time before Noggin (hours) | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| C11 | Percentage reduction in incident response time with Noggin | Composite | 95% | 95% | 95% | |
| C12 | Time saved in incident response time annually (hours) | C9*C10*C11 | 570 | 570 | 570 | |
| C13 | Subtotal: Improvement in incident response time | C6*C7*C12 | $19,095 | $19,095 | $19,095 | |
| C14 | Annual number of post-incident reports needed | C9 | 300 | 300 | 300 | |
| C15 | Average time needed to create a post-incident report before Noggin (hours) | Composite | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| C16 | Percentage reduction in time needed to create a post-incident report with Noggin | Composite | 94% | 94% | 94% | |
| C17 | Time saved from creating a post-incident report annually (hours) | C14*C15*C16 | 1,128 | 1,128 | 1,128 | |
| C18 | Subtotal: Improved post-incident reporting via automation | C6*C7*C17 | $37,788 | $37,788 | $37,788 | |
| Ct | Improved employee productivity via automation | C8+C13+C18 | $96,748 | $96,748 | $96,748 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Improved employee productivity via automation (risk-adjusted) | $87,073 | $87,073 | $87,073 | ||
| Three-year total: $261,220 | Three-year present value: $216,538 | |||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Improved overall visibility and future impact prediction. Through its integrated threat intelligence and situational awareness capabilities, Noggin consolidates data from multiple internal and external sources (e.g., operational systems, weather feeds, cybersecurity alerts, and regulatory updates) into a unified and visualized dashboard. This real-time visibility allowed the interviewees’ organizations to detect early warning signs of potential disruptions. Additionally, Noggin’s analytics and scenario modeling tools help forecast the potential impact of these threats, enabling teams to simulate outcomes, prioritize response actions, and refine mitigation strategies before incidents escalate.
The national director of business continuity at a beverage sales and distribution firm noted: “With Noggin, the whole incident reporting process is all standardized with all the rules and the requirements for incident reporting built into the system. This means I can look at my Noggin app and I can tell exactly what incidents are happening in the organization, anywhere in the world. This gives me a level of visibility I never had before.”
Improved compliance. Noggin plays a critical role in helping the interviewees’ organizations strengthen and streamline their compliance posture across regulatory, operational, and industry-specific standards. Through the centralization of compliance-related data and workflows, Noggin enabled organizations to maintain up-to-date documentation, track regulatory obligations, and automate audit trails. Its configurable templates and checklists ensured that BCPs, BIAs, and incident response protocols aligned with regulatory frameworks. Moreover, built-in review and approval workflows within the platform ensured accountability and traceability, which reduced the risk of noncompliance and enhanced readiness for audits and regulatory reviews. This also goes toward protecting the reputation of the interviewees’ organizations as compliant and reliable.
The interim head of operational resilience and business continuity of an insurance firm said: “Noggin serves as the single source of truth for critical systems and applications. It has transformed us from being undocumented and noncompliant to becoming fully compliant within a year, meeting all regulatory requirements and positioning us strongly for FCA audits.”
Enhanced CX. Interviewees shared that Noggin has helped them to elevate their organization’s CX by ensuring operational resilience and seamless communication during disruptions. By automating incident response workflows and enabling real-time stakeholder notifications, Noggin minimized service interruptions and ensured customers were kept informed throughout the incident lifecycle. This transparency builds trust and reduces frustration, especially in high-impact sectors like financial services and aviation where delays or outages can significantly affect customer satisfaction.
The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “When we can perform our duties in time and proactively, it improves passenger experience in the airport as they are able to navigate efficiently. We get a lot of positive feedback on this.”
Enhanced communications and collaboration. Noggin provided a centralized platform where teams could access real-time information, updates, and action plans during both routine operations and critical incidents, which is key to enhancing internal communications and driving collaboration. It streamlined communication through automated alerts, role-based notifications, and shared dashboards, which ensured that all relevant stakeholders are aligned and informed without delays or miscommunication. The platform’s collaborative workflows allowed cross-functional teams such as IT, operations, compliance, and executive leadership to coordinate seamlessly, assign tasks, and track progress in a transparent environment. This not only accelerated decision-making but also fostered a culture of accountability and teamwork — thereby improving organizational agility and response effectiveness.
The digital systems analyst at an airline and aviation company said: “The Noggin platform allows for the integration of other applications such as Power BI. We also integrated Microsoft Office 365 so that when critical incidents happen, we are able to chat directly and send a meeting invite within the Noggin platform itself. This helps us to collaborate better and faster to resolve the incident.”
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Noggin and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Allows integration with other systems. The digital systems analyst from an airline and aviation company that we interviewed highlighted Noggin’s flexibility in integrating with a transport monitoring system via API. This system uses bus-mounted sensors to capture real-time data on passenger activity and safety conditions. Once incidents on these transportation linkages were detected, Noggin would automatically create safety events, notify the safety team, and enable prompt response. The integration also supports task management features like due dates and reminders to ensure timely follow-up.
Customization and scalability based on evolving business needs. The interim head of operational resilience and business continuity of an insurance firm explained how their initial use of Noggin centered around business continuity and incident management. As their business needs evolved over the years, however, they have scaled the use of Noggin by building and customizing additional functionalities such as mass notification, threat intelligence, and syncing contacts. By leveraging the mass notification capability, the interviewees’ organizations have been able to work around the limitations in their HR system to raise communications lines and integrate threat intelligence feeds more effectively.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtr | One-time implementation cost | $81,576 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $81,576 | $81,576 |
| Etr | Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees | $0 | $101,750 | $118,416 | $138,290 | $358,456 | $294,264 |
| Ftr | Ongoing internal costs associated with solution maintenance and training | $0 | $57,486 | $59,433 | $61,575 | $178,494 | $147,640 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $81,576 | $159,236 | $177,849 | $199,865 | $618,526 | $523,480 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees described that the adoption process took up to six months, including migrating data from the old system, where they worked with Noggin to migrate data and configure the platform with the essential features needed to get started. The initial implementation fee is charged as professional service hours.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
It requires 200 hours of professional services from Noggin for initial migration and setup.
It requires two project managers, four product managers, and one business continuity manager to facilitate implementation.
A total of 104 internal hours are needed for the initial migration and setup based on the interviewees’ estimate.
Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this cost include the following:
The duration of professional services needed from Noggin varies by the complexity of the organization’s requirements.
The number of internal project managers, product managers, and business continuity managers involved depends on the organization’s size and vertical(s).
The time needed from the internal project managers, product managers, and business continuity managers varies by the complexity of the organization’s requirements.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $82,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Average duration of professional services needed from Noggin for migration and setup (hours) | Composite | 200 | |||
| D2 | Average cost per hour for professional services from Noggin | Composite | $155 | |||
| D3 | Subtotal: Total cost for professional services needed from Noggin for migration and setup | D1*D2 | $31,000 | |||
| D4 | Project managers involved in migration and setup | Composite | 2 | |||
| D5 | Product managers involved in migration and setup | Composite | 4 | |||
| D6 | Business continuity managers involved in migration and setup | Composite | 1 | |||
| D7 | Total internal time needed for migration and setup (hours) | Composite | 104 | |||
| D8 | Fully loaded hourly salary of a project manager | TEI standard | $48 | |||
| D9 | Fully loaded hourly salary of a product manager | TEI standard | $63 | |||
| D10 | Subtotal: Total internal costs associated with migration and set-up | ((D4*D8)+(D5*D9)+(D6*C6))*D7 | $43,160 | |||
| Dt | One-time implementation cost | D3+D10 | $74,160 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Dtr | One-time implementation cost (risk-adjusted) | $81,576 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| Three-year total: $81,576 | Three-year present value: $81,576 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that ongoing licensing fees were charged based on the number of platform users. In addition, annual training and support services from Noggin incur extra professional services fees, typically billed by the hour. Organizations also paid separately for the use of SMS to send notifications and communications through the platform.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
It starts with 300 full users who have access to all features and functionalities. This number increases by 3% per year.
From Year 2 onward, it expands the usage to 315 lite users and expands to a ratio of full to lite users at 1:2 by Year 3.
It uses 100 additional professional hours annually.
It requires a total of 5,000 SMS messages annually.
Risks. Risks that could affect the realization of this cost include the following:
The number and type of user licenses may vary depending on the specific capabilities required by different employee groups.
The additional time needed for processional services may vary by the organization’s size and verticals.
The number of SMS messages required may vary depending on the number of critical incidents and employee size of the organization.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $294,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Full users | Composite | 300 | 315 | 331 | |
| E2 | Lite users | Composite | 0 | 315 | 662 | |
| E3 | Annual cost per full user license | Interviews | $240 | $264 | $290 | |
| E4 | Annual cost per lite user license | Interviews | $11.52 | $12.67 | $13.94 | |
| E5 | Subtotal: Annual licensing cost | (E1*E3)+(E2*E4) | $72,000 | $87,151 | $105,218 | |
| E6 | Time needed for professional services annually (hours) | Composite | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| E7 | Subtotal: Annual professional services fees | E6*D2 | $15,500 | $15,500 | $15,500 | |
| E8 | SMS credits purchased annually | Composite | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| E9 | Average cost per SMS credit | Interviews | $1 | $1 | $1 | |
| E10 | Subtotal: Annual fees related to communication/SMS | E8*E9 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | |
| Et | Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees | E5+E7+E10 | $0 | $92,500 | $107,651 | $125,718 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Etr | Licensing, professional service, and communication-related fees (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $101,750 | $118,416 | $138,290 | |
| Three-year total: $358,456 | Three-year present value: $294,264 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that the platform required minimal internal effort to maintain and operate. Most interviewees said their organization subscribed to annual training sessions, particularly to onboard new users and ensure continued effective use of the system.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
A team of three project managers each need 240 hours annually for maintenance.
Each new user takes one hour for onboarding.
Risks. Risks that could affect the realization of this cost include the following:
The number of project managers involved in maintenance may vary based on the size of the organization.
The time needed for maintenance may vary depending on the complexity and volume of reports.
The number of new users per year may vary based on the size of the organization and its evolving needs.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $148,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Project managers needed to maintain solution | Composite | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| F2 | Time needed to maintain solution annually (hours) | Composite | 240 | 240 | 240 | |
| F3 | Subtotal: Annual costs associated with internal solution maintenance | F1*F2*D8 | $34,560 | $34,560 | $34,560 | |
| F4 | Average time needed for onboarding a new user (hours) | Composite | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| F5 | Total time needed to train new users annually | (E1(new users)+E2(new users))*F4 | 300 | 330 | 363 | |
| F6 | Average fully loaded hourly salary of an employee who needs training | Composite | $59 | $59 | $59 | |
| F7 | Subtotal: Annual costs associated with training new users | F5*F6 | $17,700 | $19,470 | $21,417 | |
| Ft | Ongoing internal costs associated with solution maintenance and training | F3+F7 | $52,260 | $54,030 | $55,977 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Ftr | Ongoing internal costs associated with solution maintenance and training (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $57,486 | $59,433 | $61,575 | |
| Three-year total: $178,494 | Three-year present value: $147,640 | |||||
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($81,576) | ($159,236) | ($177,849) | ($199,865) | ($618,526) | ($523,480) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $958,633 | $958,633 | $958,633 | $2,875,900 | $2,383,979 |
| Net benefits | ($81,576) | $799,397 | $780,784 | $758,769 | $2,257,374 | $1,860,499 |
| ROI | 355% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Noggin.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Noggin can have on an organization.
Interviewed Noggin stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Noggin.
Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Noggin to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, make no warranties of any kind.
Noggin, a Motorola Solutions company, reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Noggin provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Amelia Lau, SiDing Wang
August 2025
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html