Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By DeepSights
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY MARKET LOGIC, JULY 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY MARKET LOGIC, JULY 2025
Many organizations lack a single repository for market and competitive intelligence, typically storing such information on personal devices and shared drives. As a result, insights and data are difficult to find, easily lost, and not actively governed. Market Logic’s DeepSights platform is a centralized single source of truth for market research and intelligence, enabling insights teams to efficiently and comprehensively conduct analyses and respond to requests. This in turn improves and accelerates decision-making; it also reduces costs by avoiding duplication, reducing legacy tool costs, and improving compliance.
Market Logic’s DeepSights is a comprehensive platform for gathering, analyzing, and disseminating market research and insights. DeepSights enables users to find information quickly and efficiently, fostering better and faster decision-making across strategic and tactical efforts. The platform supports a wide range of use cases, from competitive analysis and trend forecasting to customer insights and market segmentation, product innovation, and messaging.
Market Logic commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying DeepSights.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of DeepSights on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers at four organizations with experience using DeepSights. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a global consumer packed goods organization with revenue of $35 billion per year.
Interviewees said that prior to using DeepSights, their organizations stored knowledge on personal devices, shared drives, and content management sites. Information and knowledge were therefore difficult to find, became easily lost, and lacked governance. This led to duplicated research projects, lost time, slow and suboptimal decision-making, lost opportunities, and compliance risks.
After the investment in DeepSights, all knowledge is governed and managed in a single central repository, resulting in accelerated request response time; reduced research (and other legacy) costs; improved efficiency, compliance, and productivity; and incremental business growth.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Speed to answer efficiency savings of $2.3 million. With DeepSights, the insights team is able to quickly and efficiently manage a large number of requests. From very simple and easy requests to complex, board-level questions, DeepSights enables the insights team to provide comprehensive answers that are backed by data in a very short time frame. In Year 3, the composite enjoys a 97% reduction in the time needed to answer more than 10,800 insights requests.
Market research cost savings of nearly $2.3 million. The composite organization is able to reduce its market research spend thanks to Market Logic because it provides a unified and single source of truth. The composite is able to cut its market research expenditure by 27% by avoiding duplication and making knowledge more accessible.
Legacy solutions cost avoidance of more than $2.1 million. By using Market Logic, the composite can reduce the number of solutions utilized for similar purposes, as well as consolidate repositories in which research and insight is held and which are no longer needed.
Business growth of $1.3 million. Dispersed teams across various geographies and markets can greatly benefit from accessing DeepSights, gaining valuable knowledge and insights that were previously out of reach. This newfound access allows these teams to assess their markets with a higher level of confidence; the impact on revenue in these regions has been significant, with up to 3% growth attributed directly to the use of DeepSights.
Time to insight efficiency savings of $916,000. Active users of DeepSights dedicate a significant portion of their time to due diligence, research, and discovery activities across various projects, regions, and departments. DeepSights streamlines these processes, enabling users to save up to 40% of the effort required to obtain the right insights. This efficiency not only enhances the quality of their work but also accelerates project timelines, allowing teams to achieve their goals more swiftly and effectively and enabling accelerated decision-making.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Faster onboarding for new joiners. Market Logic enhances the onboarding process for new employees by providing essential, up-to-date knowledge. As a result, they can perform their roles better and faster, benefiting from a structured and trustworthy knowledge environment that accelerates their integration into the organization.
Knowledge loss prevention. Market Logic plays an important role in preventing knowledge loss by centralizing and structuring valuable information. This approach ensures that critical knowledge is preserved and easily accessible, even when employees leave the company. The platform’s robust governance ensures the relevance and compliance of content over time.
Reduced innovation effort. Market Logic decreases the effort required for innovation by providing reliable and comprehensive market intelligence. Organizations can focus on strategic initiatives, trusting Market Logic to deliver cutting-edge solutions in market and competitive intelligence. This partnership allows teams to streamline their innovation processes, saving time and resources.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
License fees and implementation effort of $1.3 million. Market Logic charges platform license fees based on the number of active users, volume of data, number of connectors, and types of services. Implementation effort is spread across technology, insights, and project teams and commercial partners.
Ongoing management costs of $397,000. This cost includes effort dedicated by the insights team members to train users and support integrations. It also accounts for the time DeepSights active users dedicate to training each year.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $8.93 million over three years versus costs of $1.75 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $7.18 million and an ROI of 411%.
Percentage of time saved on all insights requests with Market Logic (Year 3)
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
| Role | Industry | Region | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project leader, customer analytics | Retail | $90 billion | 400,000 |
| Global digital commerce and shopper insights lead | Retail and pet care | $50 billion | 150,000 |
| • Director, business operations • Knowledge management team lead | Pharmaceuticals | $50 billion | 75,000 |
| Global VP, insight | Consumer goods | $20 billion | 34,000 |
Interviewees noted that before investing in Market Logic, their organizations relied heavily on hard drives and shared drives for storing market and competitive intelligence. This approach led to several challenges, as information was dispersed across various departments and regions and therefore difficult to locate.
Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Duplication of research and fragmented sources of knowledge. Different departments often independently conducted similar research, leading to redundant efforts and wasted resources. This lack of coordination resulted in multiple versions of the same information scattered across various locations, making it difficult to consolidate and utilize effectively. The fragmented nature of knowledge sources meant that valuable insights were often overlooked, incomplete, out of date, or inaccessible, hindering the organization’s ability to quickly make informed decisions. Knowledge was also lost following the departure of certain employees, or it could not be found, sometimes resulting in work or project duplication. The global digital commerce and shopper insights lead in retail explained, “It was hard to know what knowledge was available regionally, and it was common to not know things and what existed, resulting in duplication of efforts.”
High effort spent in sourcing material. Employees spent a significant amount of time searching for relevant information across multiple platforms and repositories. This fragmented approach not only delayed decision-making but also reduced productivity, as valuable hours were spent on manual research tasks. The inefficiency of this process often led to frustration and burnout because teams struggled to find the data they needed to support their projects. The lack of a streamlined system for accessing and retrieving information hindered the organization’s ability to respond quickly to market changes and opportunities, ultimately impacting its competitive edge.
Compliance issues. The decentralized and unstructured approach to knowledge management meant that sensitive information was not adequately controlled. Employees often had access to data they should not have, leading to potential breaches of confidentiality and even regulatory violations.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization is a global, consumer packaged goods organization with $35 billion in revenue. It employs 60,000 people and has a centralized insights team of 20. The firm has 500 active DeepSights users in Year 1, 800 in Year 2, and 1,600 in Year 3. These users make 10,800 insights requests every year.
Deployment characteristics. Prior to the Market Logic investment, the composite used various content management tools; market research projects were assigned from different parts of the organization, with a total expenditure of $37 million. Often, information, knowledge, and other data was stored on local devices or shared drives. The composite organization spends three months implementing an initial solution that is able to support 500 users. An additional six months of implementation effort is required to fully expand and roll out the solution during Year 1. The initial rollout covers 500 active users, which then increases to 800 in Year 2 and 1,600 in Year 3. All active users spend 1 hour per year on training to stay up to date with the tool, either through internal sessions, newsletters, and/or email updates.
$35 billion revenue
60,000 employees
Insights team of 20 people
1,600 active DeepSights users by Year 3
10,800 insights requests annually
$37 million annual market research spend
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Speed-to-answer efficiency savings | $820,648 | $915,338 | $1,020,549 | $2,756,534 | $2,269,274 |
| Btr | Market research cost savings | $911,250 | $911,250 | $911,250 | $2,733,750 | $2,266,144 |
| Ctr | Legacy solutions cost avoidance | $420,000 | $840,000 | $1,400,000 | $2,660,000 | $2,127,874 |
| Dtr | Business growth | $388,800 | $540,000 | $720,000 | $1,648,800 | $1,340,682 |
| Etr | Time-to-insight efficiency savings | $143,380 | $294,953 | $720,997 | $1,159,331 | $915,805 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $2,684,078 | $3,501,541 | $4,772,796 | $10,958,415 | $8,919,779 |
Evidence and data. One of the biggest benefits of DeepSights is its enhanced ability to confidently and reliably provide answers to questions in a more rapid, efficient, and comprehensive way, based on the most up-to-date intelligence. Interviewees reported drastic reductions in time spent on answering insights questions coming from different departments and regions.
The global VP, insight, at the consumer goods organization said: “Before [our investment into Market Logic], a request on market trends would require one or two people working on it for a full day to be answered. Now it takes 15 minutes.”
Being able to more quickly and comprehensively respond has not only led to efficiencies but also improved the insights team’s reputation, as the project leader, customer analytics, at the retail organization noted: “The reputation of the insights team has dramatically increased because of the speed and the depth of knowledge we can send to the rest of our organization. If we didn’t have Market Logic right now, we would not be able to deliver in a normal time frame all the questions we receive. We would have to pick what to focus on and leave the rest untouched.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The insights team receives 10,800 requests annually.
Fifty percent of the requests are easy to answer: These took an average of 10 minutes to answer previously. Another 20% are medium-complexity insights requests that took 30 minutes to answer; 20% are complex insights requests that took 120 minutes to answer; and 10% are board-level insights requests that took two working days to answer.
The percentage of time saved in answering insights requests overall is estimated to be 78% in Year 1, 87% in Year 2, and 97% in Year 3, as the composite becomes more familiar with Market Logic and optimizes its use.
The average fully burdened annual salary of a business insights and analytics manager is $147,313.
A productivity recapture rate of 70% is applied, as it can be assumed that only part of the time saved is reallocated by users to productive work.
Risks. This benefit may vary for organizations based on:
The amount and type of requests an insight team receives.
The average effort dedicated to each type of request.
The size of the insights team.
The average fully burdened salary of a business insights and analytics manager.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.3 million.
Average time saved responding to requests (in Year 3)
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Total annual insights requests | Composite | 10,800 | 10,800 | 10,800 | |
| A2 | Percentage of easy-to-answer requests | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| A3 | Time needed to answer easy requests (hours) | Interviews | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | |
| A4 | Percentage of medium-complexity requests | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| A5 | Time needed to answer medium-complexity requests (hours) | Interviews | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| A6 | Percentage of complex requests | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| A7 | Time needed to answer complex requests (hours) | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| A8 | Percentage of board-level requests | Interviews | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
| A9 | Time needed to answer board-level requests (hours) | Interviews | 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| A10 | Total time needed before Market Logic to answer insights requests (hours) | (A1*A2*A3)+(A1*A4*A5)+(A1*A6*A7)+(A1*A8*A9) | 23,580 | 23,580 | 23,580 | |
| A11 | Average percentage of time saved on all requests with Market Logic | Interviews | 78% | 87% | 97% | |
| A12 | Fully burdened annual salary for a business insights and analytics manager | Composite | $147,313 | $147,313 | $147,313 | |
| A13 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| At | Speed-to-answer efficiency savings | A10*A11*(A12/2,080)*A13 | $911,831 | $1,017,042 | $1,133,943 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Speed-to-answer efficiency savings (risk-adjusted) | $820,648 | $915,338 | $1,020,549 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,756,534 | Three-year present value: $2,269,274 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees explained that they have been able to significantly reduce market research costs following their investment with Market Logic. Organizations can use DeepSights to more precisely query and scan through the information that is already present, thus avoiding the need to commission additional market research. As the director of business operations at the pharmaceuticals company said: “We use DeepSights instead of going out and just commissioning another piece of market research. The process is probably the biggest contributing factor, as we established a business process to get the stakeholders to check Market Logic beforehand.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The baseline research spend, $37.5 million, is based on interview data and adapted to the composite organization’s characteristics.
Forrester assumes that 50% of the total market research spend is governed by the insights team.
The average duplication savings is 27%.
Twenty percent of the duplication savings can be attributed to DeepSights, in conjunction with organizational behavioral changes and governance efforts.
Risks. This benefit may vary for organizations based on:
The total market research spend and the portion of it governed by the insights team.
The efforts an organization is willing to make to change the culture within the organization and convince users to look into Market Logic first, rather than commissioning extra market research.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.3 million.
Average market research duplication cost avoidance
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Baseline market research spend | Composite | $37,500,000 | $37,500,000 | $37,500,000 | |
| B2 | Percentage of market research spend governed by insights team | Assumption | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| B3 | Percentage savings on research duplication | Interviews | 27% | 27% | 27% | |
| B4 | Research duplication savings attribution to Market Logic | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| Bt | Market research cost savings | B1*B2*B3*B4 | $1,012,500 | $1,012,500 | $1,012,500 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Btr | Market research cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $911,250 | $911,250 | $911,250 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,733,750 | Three-year present value: $2,266,144 | |||||
Evidence and data. By using Market Logic, interviewees have been able to realize noteworthy savings by eliminating legacy software and closing down content management systems that were redundant or no longer useful. In many cases, their organizations were able to make significant cost savings, even if they were not able to completely eliminate legacy tools. This can not only reduce the direct vendor fees for these solutions but also the associated operational and maintenance costs. The director of business operations at the pharmaceuticals organization explained, “We could eliminate some half-baked repositories — things that weren’t managed well and taking up people’s time — and shift to Market Logic.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
It had spent $3.5 million annually on various legacy solutions.
The savings on legacy solutions that is attributed to Market Logic grows from 15% in Year 1 to 30% in Year 2 and 50% in Year 3. This is due to the composite rolling out the platform to more users and their increasing familiarity with it.
Risks. This benefit may vary for organizations based on:
The proportion of legacy solutions investments that an organization can substitute.
Legacy solutions’ contract terms.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.1 million.
Year 3 legacy solutions cost reduction
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Spend on legacy solutions | Interviews | $3,500,000 | $3,500,000 | $3,500,000 | |
| C2 | Percentage savings on legacy solutions due to Market Logic | Interviews | 15% | 30% | 50% | |
| Ct | Legacy solutions cost avoidance | C1*C2 | $525,000 | $1,050,000 | $1,750,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Ctr | Legacy solutions cost avoidance (risk-adjusted) | $420,000 | $840,000 | $1,400,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,660,000 | Three-year present value: $2,127,874 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that their organizations were able to grow faster because of their DeepSights investment. While it was not straightforward for the interviewees to quantify the impact of DeepSights on business growth, they agreed that with earlier access to better information, their organizations could make better and more timely decisions, in turn enabling business growth. In one case, it was possible to more quickly validate a new competitive threat and react faster. In another, a team in a developing market was better able to tap into knowledge of how various product categories have grown, gauge the suitability of their offers for consumers and merchandisers, and tailor the marketing campaign.
The global digital commerce and shopper insights lead at the retail and pet care organization said: “Knowledge is not used once but reused globally. Double usage means double ROI for us.”
The global VP of insight at the consumer goods organization reinforced the impact of Market Logic on business growth by mentioning how time to market has decreased. They said, “Overall time-to-market for projects is definitely decreasing over the last couple of years.”
Modeling and assumptions. Dispersed teams across various geographies within the composite organization have been able to drive regional growth thanks to Market Logic. This is particularly beneficial for regions without a local insights team, as they can access the platform’s resources from other markets and tap into knowledge that is available across the entire organization.
The total revenue generated in markets where Market Logic is leveraged is specific to some regions only. In this case, it is equivalent to around 1% of global revenue, growing at 10%.
Market Logic is directly linked to a revenue uplift of 2% in Year 1, 2.5% in Year 2, and 3% in Year 3 of the total revenue generated in these markets.
An operating profit margin of 12% is applied.
Risks. This benefit may vary for organizations based on:
An organization’s overall revenue and the portion generated in various markets in which Market Logic can be leveraged.
The degree of impact on the revenue affected.
The operating profit margin.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.3 million.
Incremental revenue growth (Year 3)
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Revenue generated in markets where Market Logic is been leveraged | Interviews | $202,500,000 | $225,000,000 | $250,000,000 | |
| D2 | Percentage of revenue realized thanks to Market Logic | Interviews | 2% | 2.5% | 3% | |
| D3 | Revenue uplift from Market Logic | D1*D2 | $4,050,000 | $5,625,000 | $7,500,000 | |
| D4 | Operating profit margin | TEI methodology | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| Dt | Business growth | D3*D4 | $486,000 | $675,000 | $900,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Dtr | Business growth (risk-adjusted) | $388,800 | $540,000 | $720,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,648,800 | Three-year present value: $1,340,682 | |||||
Evidence and data. Users of the DeepSights platform benefit from it as a powerful tool to look for insight and information. These users, who come from a variety of different departments and have different use cases, save significant time in coming to these insights.
The time and effort needed to be invested in research activities is drastically reduced with DeepSights, as mentioned by the director of business operations at the pharmaceuticals organization: “In one use case, our overall project effort has been reduced from three months to three weeks. Our users can now combine information that they already have, use DeepSights, get complicated synthesis across different sources, and then put together an answer. They could basically do supercharged desk research rather than having to do fieldwork.”
The global digital commerce and shopper insights lead at the retail and pet care organization further underscored, “In terms of innovation, development, advertising, [and] market review projects, we went from taking, on average, six months to taking half the time.”
The global VP of insight at the consumer goods organization explained: “During innovation projects, we can save time with Market Logic in some initial stages. This time can then be reinvested at later stages of the project.”
Modeling and assumptions. The composite’s active users sit within the marketing, branding, strategy, innovation, and R&D teams and use DeepSights mostly for innovation and market review projects. By leveraging DeepSights, they can save time in the research, discovery, and due diligence phases of such projects, as well as in sharing research and creating “knowledge zones.”
Thirty percent of the total active user base in DeepSights is actively involved in innovation and market review activities. The remaining DeepSights active users sit in teams such as insights and sales.
Innovation and market review projects take, on average, 4.5 months, 15% of which is dedicated to due diligence/discovery activities (equivalent to 15 working days).
The percentage of time saved to get the right insight is 35% in Year 1, 45% in Year 2, and 55% in Year 3. This is due to more users becoming more familiar with Market Logic and optimizing its use to find the right insights.
The average fully burdened annual salary of a business analyst is $92,692, which is equivalent to a $357 daily rate (rounded). : It is assumed
A productivity recapture rate of 60% is applied, as it is assumed that not all of the time saved is reallocated to productive work.
Risks. The impact of this benefit may vary for different organizations due to differences in:
The average length of innovation and market review projects, as well as the portion of time dedicated to initial due diligence/discovery activities.
The impact of the tool.
The average fully burdened salary of a business analyst.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $916,000.
Time-to-insight efficiency (Year 3)
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Total DeepSights active users | Composite | 500 | 800 | 1,600 | |
| E2 | Portion of active users working on innovation and market review projects | Interviews | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
| E3 | Average time spent on due diligence/discovery activities within projects (days) | Interviews | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| E4 | Percentage of time saved to get insight with Market Logic | Interviews | 35% | 45% | 55% | |
| E5 | Fully burdened day rate for a business analyst | Composite | $357 | $357 | $357 | |
| E6 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| Et | Time-to-insight efficiency savings | E1*E2*E3*E4*E5*E6 | $168,683 | $347,004 | $848,232 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Etr | Time-to-insight efficiency savings (risk-adjusted) | $143,380 | $294,953 | $720,997 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,159,331 | Three-year present value: $915,805 | |||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Faster onboarding for new hires. The Market Logic platform, with its strategic focus on critical content, robust governance, and comprehensive change management, enhances the onboarding process for new employees. By providing only essential, strategic knowledge and ensuring that content is relevant, up-to-date, and compliant, new employees can quickly understand and trust the information they access. As a result, they can more quickly get up to speed, benefiting from a structured and trustworthy knowledge environment. The director of business operations at the pharmaceuticals organization mentioned, “The Market Logic platform is optimized for relevancy and trustworthiness, enabling new joiners to get up to speed with what they need to know faster (e.g., via querying or browsing in a more structured experience through knowledge zones).”
Knowledge loss prevention. Market Logic plays an important role in preventing knowledge loss within organizations. By centralizing and structuring valuable information, it ensures that critical knowledge is preserved and easily accessible. This is particularly important when employees leave the company, as the platform’s robust governance, which ensures that content is continuously updated and compliant, means that their expertise and insights remain within the organization. The director of business operations at the pharmaceuticals company said: “Let’s say I work in my company for 15 years and I have $4 million worth of research on my desktop, and then I leave. The knowledge I had may be wiped away, so this poses a challenge in the organizational environment around flow and loss of knowledge.”
Reduced innovation effort. Interviewees have mentioned how, by working with Market Logic, they can safely reduce their innovation effort in market intelligence because they can rely on Market Logic as an innovative player in the industry. The global VP of insight at the consumer goods organization stated: “We don’t have to basically always think about building our own innovation [or] our own product roadmap because we know Market Logic will do a lot of R&D, and therefore if they come up with something, that’s most likely also something that we want.”
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement DeepSights and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Enhanced ability to take more informed decisions. Market Logic improves organizations’ ability to make more informed decisions by providing access to accurate, up-to-date, and comprehensive market insights. With reliable information at their fingertips, users can assess market trends, competitive landscapes, and customer preferences with greater confidence. This informed approach leads to better decisions, ultimately driving improved outcomes and success for the organization. By empowering users with the right insights, Market Logic fosters a culture of data-driven decision-making. The global VP of insight at the consumer goods company noted: “Market Logic is also helping [the insights team] to be an eye-level partner and a trusted consultant to the rest of the business because now everyone gets smarter in meetings and uses insight.”
Ongoing innovation and AI capabilities. As Market Logic continues to innovate and leverage AI capabilities, its customers can expect to enjoy additional benefits as and when these are made available.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | License fees and implementation effort | $93,720 | $572,439 | $440,000 | $495,000 | $1,601,159 | $1,349,656 |
| Gtr | Ongoing management costs | $85,687 | $100,393 | $139,609 | $139,609 | $465,298 | $397,223 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $179,407 | $672,832 | $579,609 | $634,609 | $2,066,457 | $1,746,879 |
Evidence and data. The platform’s license fees are determined by the number of active users, the volume of data, the number of connectors, and the services utilized. The implementation process involves a collaborative effort from various teams including technology, insights, project management, and commercial partners, which each contribute at various stages of the DeepSights deployment.
After an initial implementation and launch, interviewees’ organizations typically allocated additional resources and effort during the first year to add more integrations and onboard more users.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The license fees increase each year, primarily driven by the growing number of users.
The initial implementation takes three months, involving 0.2 FTE from the technology team (IT director), 2 FTEs from the insights and project team, and 0.1 FTE from commercial partners (e.g., compliance manager).
The average fully burdened annual salary of an IT director is $171,914; that of a business insights and analytics manager is $147,313; and that of a compliance manager is $117,894.
This same team requires an additional six months following the initial launch to build additional integrations, add more users, and deploy across more of the organization during Year 1.
Risks. These costs could be different for other organizations because:
The license fees may be based on a different setup that may require more or less data and/or connectors.
The implementation time and effort could vary given a different initial setup.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.3 million.
Initial implementation time
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | License fees | Interviews | $0 | $350,000 | $400,000 | $450,000 |
| F2 | Months needed for implementation | Interviews | 3 | 6 | ||
| F3 | Technology team involvement (FTEs) | Interviews | 0.20 | 0.20 | ||
| F4 | Fully burdened annual salary for an IT director | Composite | $171,914 | $171,914 | ||
| F5 | Insights team lead and project team involvement (FTEs) | Interviews | 2.00 | 2.00 | ||
| F6 | Fully burdened annual salary for a business insights and analytics manager | Composite | $147,313 | $147,313 | ||
| F7 | Commercial partners involvement (FTEs) | Interviews | 0.10 | 0.10 | ||
| F8 | Fully burdened annual salary for a compliance manager | Composite | $117,894 | $117,894 | ||
| Ft | License fees and implementation effort | F2/12*((F3*F4)+(F5*F6)+(F7*F8))+F1 | $85,200 | $520,399 | $400,000 | $450,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Ftr | License fees and implementation effort (risk-adjusted) | $93,720 | $572,439 | $440,000 | $495,000 | |
| Three-year total: $1,601,159 | Three-year present value: $1,349,656 | |||||
Evidence and data. The ongoing management costs encompass various efforts to maintain and optimize the use of DeepSights. This includes the time and resources dedicated by insights team members to train users and support and maintain integrations. Additionally, it includes annual training sessions for active DeepSights users to stay updated on the platform’s features and capabilities. Most of the ongoing maintenance of DeepSights is managed by Market Logic and is included in the license fees.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Sixty percent of one FTE is required to support internal training and integrations.
All users spend 1 hour annually in training to keep up to date with capabilities. This can be in the form of optional online sessions, newsletters, and email updates.
The average fully burdened annual salary of a business analyst is $92,692.
Risks. The cost may be vary for other organizations because:
The training and integration effort required is higher or lower.
The training time could be higher or lower.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $398,000.
Annual training time per user
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Insights team members dedicated to user training and integrations management (FTEs) | Interviews | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| G2 | Fully burdened annual salary for a business analyst | Composite | $92,692 | $92,692 | $92,692 | $92,692 |
| G3 | Annual training time for users (hours) | Interviews | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| G4 | Total users trained | Interviews | 500 | 800 | 1600 | 1600 |
| G5 | Business analyst salary | G2 | $92,692 | $92,692 | $92,692 | $92,692 |
| G6 | User training time investment | G3*G4*(G5/2,080) | $22,282 | $35,651 | $71,302 | $71,302 |
| Gt | Ongoing management costs | (G1*G2)+G6 | $77,897 | $91,266 | $126,917 | $126,917 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Gtr | Ongoing management costs (risk-adjusted) | $85,687 | $100,393 | $139,609 | $139,609 | |
| Three-year total: $465,298 | Three-year present value: $397,223 | |||||
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($179,407) | ($672,832) | ($579,609) | ($634,609) | ($2,066,457) | ($1,746,879) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $2,684,078 | $3,501,541 | $4,772,796 | $10,958,415 | $8,919,779 |
| Net benefits | ($179,407) | $2,011,245 | $2,921,932 | $4,138,187 | $8,891,958 | $7,172,900 |
| ROI | 411% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in DeepSights.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that DeepSights can have on an organization.
Interviewed Market Logic stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to DeepSights.
Interviewed [x] decision-makers at organizations using DeepSights to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Related Forrester Research
The Market And Competitive Intelligence Platforms Landscape, Q3 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., August 6th, 2024.
Leverage Market And Competitive Intelligence To Ignite Growth, Forrester Research, Inc., December 26th, 2023.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Market Logic and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in DeepSights. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with DeepSights based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Market Logic or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Market Logic and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Market Logic make no warranties of any kind.
Market Logic reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Market Logic provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Jan Sythoff
June 2025
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html