Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Data Management Solutions
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Dun & Bradstreet, JANUARY 2026
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Dun & Bradstreet, JANUARY 2026
Organizations burdened by fragmented customer and supplier data environments face operational inefficiencies, missed revenue opportunities, and elevated risk. By recognizing the strategic importance of clean, unified data, organizations that implement data management solutions can reduce data duplication, streamline maintenance processes through automation, and uncover substantial cost-saving opportunities across operations such as procurement, supply chain, and customer engagement. Data management solutions can unify and enrich data, drive strategic growth, enhance operational agility, and accelerate analytics maturity across the organization.
Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions can help companies consolidate disparate data sources and systems; cleanse and enrich customer and supplier records; and automate data maintenance processes. By integrating internal records with external data sources, these solutions enable the creation of enriched, unified profiles that support more accurate decision-making, improved engagement, and streamlined operations across sales, marketing, and procurement. Through API integrations and managed data services, organizations can gain a consistent view of entities across business units, allowing them to better understand who their customers and suppliers are, how they operate, and how best to engage with them while reducing manual effort and enhancing data accuracy.
Dun & Bradstreet commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying its data management solutions.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed two decision-makers at a building product manufacturing company who have experience using Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions at their organization. Forrester used this experience to project a three-year financial analysis.
The interviewees said that prior to using data management solutions, their organization faced significant challenges stemming from decades of acquisitions and a highly fragmented technology landscape. With over 1.2 million unique records spread across five customer relationship management (CRM) instances, teams relied on manual processes and inconsistent data to make critical business decisions. Efforts to unify customer data were time-consuming and error-prone, often requiring months of work to clean and match records across just a handful of locations. This lack of visibility hindered strategic planning and limited their organization’s ability to identify cross-selling opportunities or manage supplier risk effectively.
After the investment in Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions, the interviewees’ organization reduced its customer and supplier master from 500,000 account records to 130,000 active entities by utilizing a unique identifier of the Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S Number. Interviewees said this transformation enabled faster CRM consolidation, empowered sales teams with a unified view of customer relationships, and improved supplier negotiations. Strategic business reviews became more data-driven, resulting in reshaped go-to-market strategies and deepened customer engagement. The interviewees’ organization also began leveraging clean data to support AI initiatives and future marketing efforts, accelerating innovation across the enterprise.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the interviewees’ organization include:
Incremental profit from new sales totals $5.9 million. Dun & Bradstreet data management solutions enable the organization to unify customer data, contributing to a 2% uplift in revenue. With enriched insights, sales teams close higher-margin deals; they are 10% more profitable in 50% of cases, driving measurable profit growth.
Supplier management and spend optimization delivers $5.7 million in savings. The organization improves supplier visibility and pricing consistency, avoiding $2.1 million in fraud and unlocking $1.3 million in pricing optimization yearly.
CRM consolidation reduces costs by $2.6 million. By decommissioning 80% of its five CRM systems, the organization eliminates redundant software, support, and maintenance expenses. These savings are realized in Years 2 and 3 as systems are phased out after consolidation.
Sales efficiency improvements contribute to $2.4 million in productivity gains. Clean, unified data reduces time spent on territory planning and internal reconciliation by as much as 50% on average, allowing sales teams to focus more on strategic selling and targeted customer engagement based on allocated territories.
Data management efficiencies save $906,000. Automation of record maintenance and cleansing replaces manual data work, allowing the organization to relocate seven full-time data analysis resources and enabling faster, more accurate decision-making.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified for this study include:
Strategic decision-making and customer prioritization. Executives at the interviewees’ organization gained visibility into customer value, discovering that 50% of revenue comes from just 4,500 customers. This insight reshaped how the interviewees’ organization prioritized accounts, allocated resources, and engaged across multiple layers of customer organizations, including executive-level stakeholders.
Cross-functional collaboration. Sales, customer success, and procurement teams at the interviewees’ organization operated from a unified customer view after implementing D&B data management solutions, reducing silos and improving coordination. This shared foundation enhanced operational alignment between teams and departments and supported more cohesive go-to-market strategies.
Accelerated AI adoption and analytics maturity. With clean, structured data from Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions, the interviewees’ organization rapidly advanced its analytics maturity. Teams could build smarter models and automate insights that were previously out of reach.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the interviewees’ organization include:
Professional services and licensing fees of $3.4 million. In addition to licensing fees, the interviewees’ organization pays Dun & Bradstreet for implementation services including solutions architecture, data quality assessment, golden record creation, and integration with enterprise data platforms and middleware. These services support initial deployment and ongoing access to the data management platform.
Internal implementation and operation costs of $2.3 million. This investment covers business, data, and IT personnel, including project managers, data analysts, system architects, and administrators, who support system integration, data quality, and CRM consolidation. It also includes efforts to align business processes, manage organizational change, and train users on new data management workflows and tools.
The financial analysis that is based on the interview found that the decision-makers’ organization experiences benefits of $17.5 million over three years versus costs of $5.7 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $11.8 million and an ROI of 208%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
Forrester interviewed two decision-makers who have experience using Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions at their organization. Their company has the following characteristics:
Building product manufacturer
Plants across North America
Annual revenue of $1.5 billion
Before investing in Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions, the building product manufacturer operated with siloed CRM systems and fragmented customer records, making it difficult to identify customers that were shared across multiple sales teams or support strategic sales efforts. According to interviewees, manual data cleansing was slow and resource intensive. Procurement teams lacked visibility into supplier relationships, facing challenges with inconsistent pricing and fraud risk. Inaccurate and inconsistent data led to reporting issues, sales teams spending time chasing unqualified leads, and challenged confidence in executive decision-making.
Interviewees noted how their organization struggled with common challenges, including:
Inaccurate sales reporting and missed opportunities. Duplicate records and inconsistent data led to misattributed revenue and inefficient sales targeting.
Limited visibility into supplier relationships. Procurement teams struggled to identify pricing inconsistencies and risk exposure due to siloed supplier data.
Fragmented and duplicative customer data. With five CRM systems and 1.2 million unique records, the interviewees’ organization lacked a unified view of customers, making cross-sell and strategic sales nearly impossible.
Slow and costly manual data cleansing. Manually consolidating account records to create customer masters across the interviewees’ organization would have taken an estimated 1,500 months of effort.
The interviewees’ organization searched for a solution that could:
Unify customer and supplier data to enable strategic sales and procurement decisions
Empower solution selling by identifying cross-selling opportunities across business units.
Mitigate risk and reduce spend through supplier normalization and fraud detection.
Accelerate CRM consolidation and reduce technical debt by decommissioning redundant CRM systems and instances.
Enable AI-driven insights by improving data quality and structure.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a company summary, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The organization summary is representative of the interviewees’ organization, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The organization has the following characteristics:
Predeployment characteristics. Prior to implementing Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions, the organization operated in a fragmented business-to-business (B2B) customer data environment due to decades of acquisitions, disparate CRM systems, and the lack of a unified customer view. Over 50% duplication in account records across 500,000 unique entities led to inefficiencies and limited cross-business insights.
Postdeployment characteristics. Following a six-month deployment, and a 12-month services engagement with Dun & Bradstreet, the organization unifies its previously fragmented and inefficient data systems and consolidates CRM systems. The deployment includes D&B Connect, Data Advisory Services, and other managed components, all integrated through APIs and the organization’s system integration platform into its enterprise data warehouse and primary CRM.
For this use case, Forrester has modeled benefits and costs over three years.
10,000 total employees
200 sales representatives
65 procurement and credit analysts
1.2 million unique records spread across five CRM instances
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Incremental profit from new sales | $318,938 | $3,543,750 | $3,543,750 | $7,406,438 | $5,881,134 |
| Btr | Supplier management and spend optimization | $927,563 | $3,091,876 | $3,091,876 | $7,111,315 | $5,721,481 |
| Ctr | CRM consolidation savings | $0 | $1,425,000 | $1,900,000 | $3,325,000 | $2,605,184 |
| Dtr | Sales efficiency improvement | $390,505 | $1,301,682 | $1,301,682 | $2,993,869 | $2,408,748 |
| Etr | Data management efficiencies | $147,032 | $490,105 | $490,105 | $1,127,242 | $906,934 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $1,784,038 | $9,852,413 | $10,327,413 | $21,963,864 | $17,523,481 |
Evidence and data. By implementing clean, enriched data from Dun & Bradstreet, the interviewees’ organization unlocked significant financial gains through strategic solution selling and intentional cross-sell initiatives. Interviewees noted that this transformation led to measurable improvements in profit margins and generated millions in additional revenue by enabling collaborative, data-driven sales across business units. By enabling clean data segmentation and hierarchy mapping for the CRM rollout, Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions played a key role in contributing to a 2% uplift in revenue from selling initiatives.
Revenue lift from improved data visibility. The interviewees’ organization experienced additional revenue attributed to improved cross-sell visibility and strategic selling. Interviewees said clean data enabled teams to identify cross-sell opportunities that were previously hidden due to fragmented systems and duplicative records. The head of analytics strategy said, “By adopting a more collaborative, solution-selling approach, we generated an additional $300 million in business within the first two years.”
More intentional solution selling. Prior to implementation, cross-selling at the interviewees’ organization was often unintentional and siloed. Post-implementation, teams collaborated across business units to present unified solutions, increasing deal size and margin. The VP of solution operations explained: “We didn’t even know we were cross-selling until we saw the data. Now we’re doing it intentionally and collaboratively.”
Higher profit margins. The head of analytics strategy described a significant uplift in profit margins due to solution selling enabled by clean, enriched data: “When we delivered a full solution selling initiative, we saw 10% higher margins on many of our deals. ... The profit margin applies to roughly half of solution-selling initiatives. It doesn’t work in every scenario, but there is a definite uplift now that we have visibility into our market.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
The organization’s annual revenue is $1.5 billion.
Benefits begin to accrue during Year 1 due to the organization’s early access to cleansed data even before full CRM consolidation; the organization realizes 30% of the benefit in Year 1. The organization experiences 100% of that benefit in Years 2 and 3.
Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions enable clean data segmentation and hierarchy mapping for the CRM rollout and contribute directly to the 2% uplift in revenue from cross-selling and solution selling initiatives.
The organization’s net profit margin is 12.5%, and it realizes a 10% uplift in net profit margin on 50% of its solution-selling initiatives due to improved customer insights and collaboration.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The sales team’s maturity and ability to implement structured solution selling and cross-sell programs.
The organization’s data readiness and hygiene.
The complexity of CRM integration and system fragmentation.
The organization’s change management effectiveness and sales team adoption of data tools.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.9 million.
Higher profit margin on more targeted and streamlined solution-selling initiatives
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Annual revenue | Company | $1,500,000,000 | $1,500,000,000 | $1,500,000,000 | |
| A2 | Rate of benefit realization from D&B data cleansing | Interview | 30% | 100% | 100% | |
| A3 | Percentage of revenue lift from solution selling initiatives attributed to D&B | Interview | 2% | 2% | 2% | |
| A4 | Revenue lift from accelerated CRM rollout and sales agility | A1*A2*A3 | $9,000,000 | $30,000,000 | $30,000,000 | |
| A5 | Net profit margin | Company | 12.50% | 12.50% | 12.50% | |
| A6 | Improved net profit margin from higher margin deals | A5*1.1 | 13.75% | 13.75% | 13.75% | |
| At | Incremental profit from new sales | (((A4/2)*A5)+(A4/2)*A6))*A2 | $354,375 | $3,937,500 | $3,937,500 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Incremental profit from new sales (risk-adjusted) | $318,938 | $3,543,750 | $3,543,750 | ||
| Three-year total: $7,406,438 | Three-year present value: $5,881,134 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees highlighted how normalized supplier data improved visibility, reduced risk, and enabled smarter procurement decisions that led to measurable cost avoidance and operational efficiency.
Supplier visibility and fraud risk mitigation. The interviewees’ organization benefited from enriched supplier profiles and access to current business information, which supported more informed procurement decisions. Their teams used Dun & Bradstreet’s portal to accelerate supplier analysis and validate payment details, reducing exposure to fraud and enabling faster collections. The head of analytics strategy noted: “We gave the procurement team licenses into the Dun & Bradstreet portal so they could validate whether a supplier’s invoice was valid and identify fraudulent invoices. We probably have saved millions by reducing fraud. Also, Dun & Bradstreet flagged suppliers that are likely to go out of business within 12 months. That helped us collect faster and avoid losses.”
Price and contract optimization. Interviewees noted that normalized and enriched supplier data enabled procurement teams to better understand who their suppliers were and where they operate, helping them identify duplicates, consolidate contracts, and negotiate more effectively. These improvements led to an estimated $2.1 million in annual avoided supplier spend, driven by a 0.25% optimization in procurement spend. The VP of solution operations said, “Just understanding who our common suppliers are and normalizing that data helped us save millions.”
Savings from operational efficiency. According to interviewees, implementation of Dun & Bradstreet data streamlined supplier data management. Manual data scrubbing, previously requiring three full-time employees, was automated, freeing up those resources for more strategic roles. The head of analytics strategy explained: “We had three people working full-time just to scrub supplier data. Now that’s automated.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
The company spends approximately $853.1 million annually on suppliers (cost of goods sold).
Benefits begin to accrue during Year 1 due to the organization’s early access to cleansed data even before full CRM consolidation; the organization realizes 30% of the annual benefit in Year 1. The organization experiences 100% of that benefit in Years 2 and 3.
With improved supplier data visibility, the organization avoids paying fraudulent invoices totaling 0.25% of its suppliers’ spending.
The organization optimizes 0.15% of supplier spend through better contract negotiations.
Sixty-five procurement and credit analyst FTEs see their work simplified by better data visibility, leading to labor cost savings of 5% which equals a total of three procurement and credit analyst FTEs reallocated due to automation and improved data quality.
The average fully burdened annual salary for these roles is $75,000.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The availability of supplier data and ability to normalize and detect fraud.
The maturity of the organization’s procurement process and analytics capabilities.
Current spending volume and supplier engagement scale.
The organization’s internal capacity and automation readiness for analyst reallocation.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.7 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Supplier spend | Company | $853,125,000 | $853,125,000 | $853,125,000 | |
| B2 | Risk percentage of fraudulent supplier spend flagged by D&B | Interview | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
| B3 | Subtotal: Supplier fraud avoided with improved data visibility | B1*B2 | $2,132,813 | $2,132,813 | $2,132,813 | |
| B4 | Percentage of optimized pricing with suppliers through supplier data normalization attributed to D&B | Interview | 0.15% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
| B5 | Subtotal: Supplier spend optimized with improved data visibility | B1*B4 | $1,279,688 | $1,279,688 | $1,279,688 | |
| B6 | Procurement and credit analysts FTEs before D&B | Company | 65 | 65 | 65 | |
| B7 | Percentage reduction in FTE resources with D&B | Interview | 5% | 5% | 5% | |
| B8 | Procurement and credit analysts reallocated due to supplier data automation attributed to D&B | B6*B7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| B9 | Fully burdened annual salary for a procurement and credit analyst | Company | $75,000 | $75,000 | $75,000 | |
| B10 | Subtotal: Cost of procurement and credit analysts saved due to supplier data automation | B8*B9 | $225,000 | $225,000 | $225,000 | |
| B11 | Rate of benefit realization from D&B data cleansing | Interview | 30% | 100% | 100% | |
| Bt | Supplier management and spend optimization | (B3+B5+B10)*B11 | $1,091,250 | $3,637,501 | $3,637,501 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Btr | Supplier management and spend optimization (risk-adjusted) | $927,563 | $3,091,876 | $3,091,876 | ||
| Three-year total: $7,111,315 | Three-year present value: $5,721,481 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees’ organization employed Dun & Bradstreet to unify customer and supplier data and deliver cleansed records into its enterprise data platform, giving teams early access to high-quality information and a clearer understanding of their active and prospective customers. This integration of disparate data sources into a consistent, enriched foundation enabled the interviewees’ organization to simplify its technology stack and sunset redundant systems. With a unified view of customer and supplier entities, the interviewees’ organization successfully migrated to a single CRM environment, enhancing visibility and supporting more efficient operations across teams.
CRM consolidation. The head of analytics strategy explained how clean customer data was a prerequisite to successfully consolidate their organization’s five separate CRM systems into a single CRM instance: “Clean data was the foundation. Without it, CRM consolidation would have been much harder.” The VP of solution operations added: “We were operating at least five different CRMs. Now we’re down to one.”
Cost savings. Interviewees said that decommissioning 80% of legacy CRM systems and instances across their organization resulted in significant cost savings related to software licensing, support, and maintenance. The head of analytics strategy noted, “We’re turning off legacy CRMs and saving hundreds of thousands per system.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
The organization operates five CRM systems prior to the data management solutions implementation.
Following data cleansing and consolidation, 80% of these systems are decommissioned, resulting in four systems being retired.
The average attributable annual cost of a decommissioned CRM system is $500,000.
Seventy-five percent of these savings are realized in Year 2 of the deployment while all of these costs are phased out by Year 3.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The number of existing legacy systems and CRM decommissioning potential.
The organization’s licensing and contract terms for CRM platforms.
The availability of IT resources for CRM integration and architecture.
The organization’s data migration complexity and standardization readiness.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.6 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | CRM systems before D&B deployment and consolidation | Interview | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| C2 | Percentage of CRM systems decommissioned | Interview | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| C3 | CRM systems decommissioned after D&B deployment and consolidation | C1*C2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| C4 | Average attributable cost of a decommissioned CRM system (software, support, maintenance) | Company | $500,000 | $500,000 | $500,000 | |
| C5 | Rate of benefit realization from D&B data cleansing | Interview | 0% | 75% | 100% | |
| Ct | CRM consolidation savings | C3*C4*C5 | $0 | $1,500,000 | $2,000,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓5% | |||||
| Ctr | CRM consolidation savings (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $1,425,000 | $1,900,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $3,325,000 | Three-year present value: $2,605,184 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that trusted, unified customer data streamlined sales planning, reduced territory disputes, and empowered more strategic engagement across their organization’s business units.
Time savings and productivity gains. At the interviewees’ organization, improved data quality and visibility led to measurable time savings for 200 sales representatives, each saving an estimated 30 minutes daily. The VP of solution operations said, “Trusted data has reduced internal disputes and enabled more strategic engagement.” The executive noted that 95% of that time is now reinvested in selling activities, adding: “That time is now spent selling. It’s not just saved — it’s reinvested.”
Strategic engagement and collaboration. Interviewees said that clean, trusted data transformed how teams operate, reducing internal disputes, enhancing cross-team collaboration, and enabling more strategic engagement. The head of analytics strategy shared, “It has totally changed our dynamic, totally changed our thought process on how we do business.” This shift also supported more collaborative, insight-driven solution selling as per the VP of solution operations: “The solution selling is a collaborative endeavor; they all have their own business unit responsibilities but now they share insights across teams.”
Improved business reviews and decision-making. Enhanced data quality elevated the value of strategic business reviews (SBRs) at the interviewees’ organization, enabling more confident, data-driven decisions. The head of analytics strategy noted: “Those strategic business reviews have become infinitely more valuable. We go in knowing who our unique entities are and where cross-selling already exists.”
Territory alignment and customer engagement. According to interviewees, unified customer views noticeably reduced territory disputes and improved team alignment. The head of analytics strategy explained, “Ownership is moving away from individual sales reps to a more collective view, which helped us gain better traction with customers and created more stickiness.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
The organization has 200 sales representatives.
Prior to implementation, each representative spent an average of 60 minutes per day on data analysis and territory planning tasks.
Post-implementation, this time was reduced to 30 minutes per representative. With the implementation of clean, enriched data, sales teams reduced time spent on data analysis and territory planning tasks by 50%.
The average fully burdened annual salary for a sales representative is $125,000.
Ninety-five percent of the time saved is recaptured as productive selling time.
Benefits begin to accrue in Year 1 with 30% of the total benefit realized during implementation due to early access to enriched data. The organization realizes 100% of the total benefit in Years 2 and 3.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The organization’s sales team size and aggregate productivity potential
The organization’s territory complexity and suitability for planning automation
The organization’s tool adoption and data-driven workflow uptake
The organization’s baseline inefficiencies and enablement platform maturity
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.4 million.
Less time spent on data analysis and territory planning activities
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Sales representatives | Company | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
| D2 | Average time spent daily on data analysis and territory planning tasks (minutes) | Company | 60 | 60 | 60 | |
| D3 | Percentage of time saved after D&B deployment and CRM consolidation | Interview | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| D4 | Average time saved daily on data analysis tasks (minutes) | D2*D3 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
| D5 | Fully burdened annual salary for a sales representative | Company | $125,000 | $125,000 | $125,000 | |
| D6 | Sales representative productivity recapture rate | Company | 95% | 95% | 95% | |
| D7 | Rate of benefit realization from D&B data cleansing | Interview | 30% | 100% | 100% | |
| Dt | Sales efficiency improvement | D1*D4*D5/2,080/60)*240)*D6*D7 | $411,058 | $1,370,192 | $1,370,192 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓5% | |||||
| Dtr | Sales efficiency improvement (risk-adjusted) | $390,505 | $1,301,682 | $1,301,682 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,993,869 | Three-year present value: $2,408,748 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees said that automation and data cleansing drastically reduced data duplication, manual effort, and maintenance costs, freeing up data management resources for higher-value activities at their organization.
Automation and resource reallocation. Prior to implementation, the interviewees’ organization relied heavily on manual data cleansing with eight full-time data analysts dedicated to maintaining customer records. The head of analytics strategy pointed out: “We had eight analysts manually cleansing data. Now, only one is needed.” After deploying automated data refreshes and cleansing processes, the interviewees’ organization reallocated seven of these analysts to more strategic roles.
Data cleanup and entity reduction. The interviewees’ organization reduced its unique data records from 500,000 to 130,000 active entities, eliminating over 50% of duplicative and fragmented records — many of which represented partial or inconsistent versions of the same entity. The head of analytics strategy elaborated: “We found out we only do business with about 130,000 active entities. That’s a huge cleanup.” Weekly automated refreshes now maintain over 90% of active revenue records, significantly reducing manual effort. The VP of solution operations shared: “It just refreshes. No manual effort. That’s a game changer.”
Accelerated decision-making. Interviewees noted that the shift from manual cleansing to automated data management freed up resources and accelerated decision-making. The head of analytics strategy elaborated: “We took 1,500 months’ worth of work and did it in 18. That’s the power of automation.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
The organization employed eight data analysts for manual customer data cleansing prior to implementation.
Post-implementation, seven of these analysts, or 87.5%, were reallocated due to automation.
The average fully burdened annual salary for a data analyst is $73,700.
Benefits begin to accrue in Year 1, with 30% of the total benefit realized during implementation due to early access to enriched data. The organization realizes 100% of the total benefit in Years 2 and 3.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The extent of data duplication and need for cleansing automation.
The organization’s automation capability and integration infrastructure.
The willingness to embrace automation and any existing governance constraints.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $907,000.
Percentage of customer records refreshed automatically
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Data analyst FTEs before D&B | Interview | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| E2 | Percentage reduction in FTE resources with D&B | Interview | 87.5% | 87.5% | 87.5% | |
| E3 | Data analysts dedicated to data cleansing reallocated after D&B implementation | E1*E2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| E4 | Fully burdened annual salary for a data analyst | Company | $73,700 | $73,700 | $73,700 | |
| E5 | Rate of benefit realization from D&B data cleansing | Interview | 30% | 100% | 100% | |
| Et | Data management efficiencies | E3*E4*E5 | $154,770 | $515,900 | $515,900 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓5% | |||||
| Etr | Data management efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $147,032 | $490,105 | $490,105 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,127,242 | Three-year present value: $906,934 | |||||
The interviewee mentioned the following additional benefits that the organization experienced but was not able to quantify:
Strategic decision-making and customer prioritization. Executives at the interviewees’ organization gained a clearer view of customer value after discovering that half of the company’s revenue came from just 4,500 entities. This insight, enabled by Dun & Bradstreet’s data enrichment and entity resolution, fundamentally changed how leadership approached account strategy. The interviewees noted that instead of treating all customers equally, their organization began prioritizing high-value accounts, aligning executive engagement across layers, and tailoring go-to-market efforts based on actual revenue impact. The head of analytics strategy said, “Learning that half our revenue comes from just 4,500 customers reshaped how we go to market, enabling leadership to focus on the right accounts and allocate resources more strategically.”
Cross-functional collaboration. Previously, departments like sales, marketing, procurement, and credit at the interviewees’ organization operated in silos, each relying on different data sources. This led to misalignment, inefficiencies, and internal account or territory disputes. Interviewees said Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions provided advanced identity resolution and data enrichment capabilities that linked internal records with external attributes such as buyer intent, demographics, and ownership. This deeper understanding of customer entities supported more targeted engagement and strategic account planning across the organization’s teams and departments. The VP of solution operations confirmed: “Sales, marketing, procurement, and credit all had to be aligned. That took time but it was worth it.”
Accelerated AI adoption and analytics maturity. Before implementing Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions, fragmented and inconsistent data limited the interviewees’ organization’s ability to scale analytics and AI. With clean, structured data flowing into its enterprise data platform and CRM, teams were able to build smarter models, automate insights, and unlock use cases that were previously out of reach. This transformation accelerated AI adoption by two to three years, allowing the company to leap ahead in its analytics maturity and strategic planning capabilities. The head of analytics strategy noted, “Clean data is the essence that AI needs to be valuable, and we’ve accelerated our ability to bring AI into our company by probably years.”
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Lead generation transformation. To move beyond fragmented sales efforts, the interviewees’ company leveraged Dun & Bradstreet’s enriched data to unify its go-to-market approach. This shift marked a transition from siloed solution selling where individual business units operated independently, to a coordinated strategy that prioritized high-value accounts across the enterprise. Interviewees noted that with improved visibility into customer relationships spanning multiple business units, marketing teams could align campaigns more effectively with sales priorities. This unified view not only enhanced cross-selling and upselling opportunities at the interviewees’ organization but also informed acquisition strategy by identifying markets and customer segments with the greatest growth potential. The VP of solution operations explained: “It gave us visibility into the market where we had the opportunity to inform our acquisition strategy. It certainly informed how we were going to go to market.”
Enhanced digital engagement and website visitor resolution. The interviewees noted their organization is currently enhancing its digital engagement strategy by integrating additional Dun & Bradstreet tools like D&B Rev.Up, D&B Hoovers, and website visitor resolution to identify anonymous website visitors and match them to known entities. This capability connected digital signals to real business opportunities and enabled marketing and sales teams to target prospects based on intent, uncovered whitespace, and personalized their outreach. These tools also unlocked visibility into “gray space” (underpenetrated existing accounts) and “white space” (new prospects resembling top customers), supporting more precise targeting and lead generation for the interviewees’ organization. The VP of solution operations noted, “Even if visitors don’t fill out a form, we can unmask who they are and pursue opportunities based on their intent to purchase.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | Fees to Dun & Bradstreet | $0 | $1,295,700 | $1,357,650 | $1,418,550 | $4,071,900 | $3,365,711 |
| Gtr | Internal costs | $50,243 | $1,446,375 | $609,000 | $609,000 | $2,714,618 | $2,325,985 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $50,243 | $2,742,075 | $1,966,650 | $2,027,550 | $6,786,518 | $5,691,696 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that Dun & Bradstreet charged approximately $1.2 million during the 12-month implementation period for professional services. In Years 2 and 3, Dun & Bradstreet charged annual license fees as part of a four-year usage-based contract. The implementation services included:
Solutions architecting and assessing data quality.
Data cleansing and establishing a “golden record” using match grade string logic.
Customizing boilerplate templates to support specific use cases.
Designing data flows into and out of the enterprise data platform, which began prior to CRM consolidation.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
The organization incurs $1.2 million in implementation service costs in Year 1.
In Years 2 and 3, it pays $1.3 million and $1.4 million respectively in license fees to Dun & Bradstreet.
These costs cover both initial deployment and ongoing access to Dun & Bradstreet’s data management platform and services.
Implementation services include setup, customization, and integration into the enterprise data platform and CRM environments.
License fees are modeled as recurring annual costs based on usage and scale. Pricing may vary. Contact Dun & Bradstreet for additional details.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these costs may not be representative of all experiences. Factors that may impact the fees to Dun & Bradstreet include:
The organization’s scale and usage over time
The organization’s ability to scope and manage implementation services; customize templates and integrate data flows; maintain data quality and establish golden records; and align enterprise platforms for consolidation.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.4 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Implementation services | Interview | $1,234,000 | $0 | $0 | |
| F2 | License fee | Interview | $0 | $1,293,000 | $1,351,000 | |
| Ft | Fees to D&B | F1+F2 | $1,234,000 | $1,293,000 | $1,351,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Ftr | Fees to D&B (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $1,295,700 | $1,357,650 | $1,418,550 | |
| Three-year total: $4,071,900 | Three-year present value: $3,365,711 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that their organization incurred internal costs across three key resource categories during implementation:
Business and project resources. These resources included business process owners, change management leads, and project managers who coordinated the proposal and project implementation phases.
Data and analytics resources. Data analysts and engineers ensured data quality, aligned records with the “golden record” standard, and managed data flow into the enterprise data platform. A master data specialist supported ongoing analytics and data integrity.
Technical and IT resources. ERP architects, integration specialists, system administrators, and security analysts designed and implemented the CRM consolidation and system integration.
The interviewees estimated that the timing of the overhaul of their organization’s data environment, which was originally scoped to take one to three years, accelerated and was largely completed within one year due to the implementation of Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions.
Modeling and assumptions. During the implementation period, internal costs are distributed across business teams, data analytics and management teams, and IT functions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
In Year 1, the organization allocates:
In Years 2 and 3, ongoing support is maintained with:
A blended fully burdened annual salary for all roles is $145,000. These internal costs reflect the effort required to implement, maintain, and optimize the data management solution and CRM consolidation.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these costs may not be representative of all experiences. Factors that may impact the internal costs include:
The organization’s ability to align business and project resources during implementation; maintain data quality and align records to enterprise standards; and allocate technical and IT resources
The organization’s internal capacity and familiarity with data management tools
The organization’s ability to sustain ongoing support across business, analytics, and IT functions.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.3 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Business and project management FTEs for business alignment and project management | Interview | 0.33 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| G2 | Data and analytics FTEs | Interview | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
| G3 | IT architect and engineer FTEs | Company | 6.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| G4 | Blended fully burdened annual salary for an FTE | Company | $145,000 | $145,000 | $145,000 | $145,000 |
| Gt | Internal costs | (G1+G2+G3)*G4 | $47,850 | $1,377,500 | $580,000 | $580,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Gtr | Internal costs (risk-adjusted) | $50,243 | $1,446,375 | $609,000 | $609,000 | |
| Three-year total: $2,714,618 | Three-year present value: $2,325,985 | |||||
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($50,243) | ($2,742,075) | ($1,966,650) | ($2,027,550) | ($6,786,518) | ($5,691,696) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $1,784,038 | $9,852,413 | $10,327,413 | $21,963,864 | $17,523,481 |
| Net benefits | ($50,243) | ($958,037) | $7,885,763 | $8,299,863 | $15,177,347 | $11,831,785 |
| ROI | 208% | |||||
| Payback | 14 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interview, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions can have on an organization.
Interviewed Dun & Bradstreet stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions.
Interviewed a decision-maker with experience using Dun & Bradstreet’s data management solutions at their organization to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interview using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewee.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Related Forrester Research
Advancements In MDM Solutions Mean Data Harmony And Future-Ready Insights, Forrester Research, Inc., December 11, 2023.
Master Data Management Key Performance Indicators To Maximize Data Consistency And Business Value, Forrester Research, Inc., September 4, 2025.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Dun & Bradstreet and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Data Management.
Dun & Bradstreet reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Dun & Bradstreet provided the customer name for the interview but did not participate in the interview.
Lena Baudo
January 2026
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html