A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Workvivo, August 2024
According to Forrester research, an intranet platform is “a trusted digital source of corporate communication and content designed to educate and empower employees and improve their digital workplace experiences.”1 The proliferation of hybrid work accelerated the need for organizations to deploy technology that enables direct asynchronous communication to keep employees connected to the organization and to each other no matter where they work. Workvivo, a digital-first employee experience platform (EXP), can simplify internal communication, foster engagement, and digitally revive a company’s culture, ensuring employees feel included and valued regardless of their workplace.
Workvivo is an EXP that elevates communication capabilities and allows organizations to reach and engage their entire workforces, which subsequently engenders a more connected and inclusive work culture. By replacing outdated intranets with a modern EXP, Workvivo enables seamless integration with various productivity, collaboration, and HR tools. Its analytics tools facilitate fast feedback loops by identifying employee engagement patterns. This enhances the EXP, ensures content relevance, and enables data-driven decisions.
Workvivo commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Workvivo.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Workvivo on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four representatives with experience using Workvivo. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a global retail organization with revenue of $10 billion. The composite has 60,000 employees, and 75% are frontline workers (i.e., non-desk workers).
has 0 total employees and 0% of those are frontline workers. It replaces 0 legacy solutions with Workvivo. Custom results are based on your inputs and the TEI case study.
Interviewees said that prior to using Workvivo, their organizations had collections of disparate tools and systems that were difficult to navigate, leading to inefficiencies and poor employee experience (EX). Moreover, the interviewees’ organizations had difficulty with effective companywide communication because frontline employees had inequitable access to information. Mass communication was encumbered by dated and ineffective methods, with language barriers often inhibiting its efficacy. These limitations led to disconnected workforces and low employee engagement, and they left executives without a temperature gauge on employee sentiment.
Interviewees shared that after the investment in Workvivo, their organizations elevated communication and employee engagement which, in turn, fostered a sense of community, common culture, and shared values. Key results from the investment include streamlined and more effective communication, enhanced productivity, having easier and equitable access to information for all employees, and cost savings from the ability to retire legacy intranets and homegrown tools.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
For , this benefit could be worth over three years.
For , this benefit could be worth over three years.
For , this benefit could be worth over three years.
For , this benefit could be worth over three years.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
For , this cost could be over three years.
For , this cost could be over three years.
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $12.1 million over three years versus costs of $3.7 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $8.4 million and an ROI of 228%.
could experience benefits of over three years versus costs of , adding up to an NPV of and an ROI of 0%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Workvivo.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Workvivo can have on an organization.
Interviewed Workvivo stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Workvivo.
Interviewed four representatives at organizations using Workvivo to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Workvivo and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Workvivo. For the interactive functionality using Configure Data/Custom Data, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Workvivo based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Workvivo or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Workvivo and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Workvivo make no warranties of any kind.
Workvivo reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Workvivo provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Ashleigh Cohen
Stefanie Vollmer
| Role | Industry | Region | Number of employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global fulfillment engagement manager | Retail | Global | 45,000 |
| Director of talent | Aviation | Europe and North Africa | 28,000 |
| Technology director for employee experience | Consumer Goods | Global | 80,000 |
| Communication channel manager | Manufacturing | Global | 200,000 |
Interviewees said that prior to using Workvivo, their organizations had ineffective companywide communications that were only one way (top-down) and heavily relied on verbal methods. Because frontline employees had inequitable and indirect access to information, it left room for miscommunication and the use of informal, non-company communication channels the organizations could not monitor.
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that could:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the four interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite is a global retail organization with revenue of $10 billion. The organization has a strong brand and global operations across 40 locations. It also has a large employee base of 60,000 with 75% frontline workers and 25% desk workers.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using the solution in Year 1 following a three-month phased implementation period across the 40 locations. The rollout covers 100% of the workforce across all geographies.
has 0 total employees, and 0% of those are frontline workers. It replaces 0 legacy solutions with Workvivo. Custom results are based on your inputs and the TEI case study.
| Ref | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Cost savings on legacy systems and processes | $1,926,000 $1,926,000 | $3,852,000 $3,852,000 | $3,852,000 $3,852,000 | $9,630,000 $9,630,000 | $7,828,445 $7,828,445 |
| Btr | Efficiency gains for HR, communications, and IT teams | $671,034 $671,034 | $671,034 $671,034 | $671,034 $671,034 | $2,013,101 $2,013,101 | $1,668,761 $1,668,761 |
| Ctr | Improved retention for frontline employees | $946,485 $946,485 | $946,485 $946,485 | $946,485 $946,485 | $2,839,455 $2,839,455 | $2,353,768 $2,353,768 |
| Dtr | Productivity savings for senior directors | $93,234 $93,234 | $93,234 $93,234 | $93,234 $93,234 | $279,703 $279,703 | $231,860 $231,860 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $3,636,753 $3,636,753 | $5,562,753 $5,562,753 | $5,562,753 $5,562,753 | $14,762,259 $14,762,259 | $12,082,834 $12,082,834 | |
Evidence and data. Interviewees found that adopting Workvivo enabled their organizations to remove systems and processes that no longer suited their needs. Namely, they said their organizations removed legacy intranets and internal communication platforms because Workvivo provides a more accessible and visible platform for employees to communicate with one another and to directly receive companywide messages.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The extent to which an organization realizes this benefit can vary due to the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $7.8 million.
For , with 0 legacy tools, a translation budget of $0, and $0 in live-streaming costs, this benefit may have a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of .
The following table shows custom results for .
| Ref | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | License cost for global web-based communication systems | InterviewsTEI case study | $540,000$540,000 | $540,000$540,000 | $540,000$540,000 | |
| A2 | License cost for local web-based communication systems | InterviewsTEI case study | $264,000$264,000 | $264,000$264,000 | $264,000$264,000 | |
| A3 | Legacy communication systems | CompositeComposite | 1010 | 1010 | 1010 | |
| A4 | Subtotal: Cost savings on removal of web-based communication systems | A1+(A2*A3) | $3,180,000 $3,180,000 | $3,180,000 $3,180,000 | $3,180,000 $3,180,000 | |
| A5 | Cost of translations | CompositeComposite | $1,000,000$1,000,000 | $1,000,000$1,000,000 | $1,000,000$1,000,000 | |
| A6 | Reduction in cost of translations | InterviewsTEI case study | 90%90% | 90%90% | 90%90% | |
| A7 | Subtotal: Cost savings on reduction in translation costs | A5*A6 | $900,000$900,000 | $900,000$900,000 | $900,000$900,000 | |
| A8 | Subtotal: Cost savings on removing live-streaming vendor | CompositeComposite | $200,000$200,000 | $200,000$200,000 | $200,000$200,000 | |
| A9 | Value realization | TEI standard | 50%50% | 100%100% | 100%100% | |
| At | Cost savings on legacy systems and processes | (A4+A7+A8)*A9 | $2,140,000 $2,140,000 | $4,280,000 $4,280,000 | $4,280,000 $4,280,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Cost savings on legacy systems and processes (risk-adjusted) | $1,926,000 $1,926,000 | $3,862,000 $3,862,000 | $3,862,000 $3,862,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $9,630,000 $9,630,000 | Three-year present value: $7,828,445 $7,828,445 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees said their organization’s HR, communications, and IT teams became more efficient as a result of Workvivo. In particular, HR and communications teams benefitted from streamlining processes regarding the formation and dissemination of company messages while IT resources involved in supporting legacy systems and processes were able to pivot to focus on different business needs.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The extent to which an organization realizes this benefit can vary due to the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.7 million.
For , with 0 HR and communications team employees, this benefit may have a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of .
The following table shows custom results for .
| Ref | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | HR and communications team members | CompositeComposite | 200200 | 200200 | 200200 |
| B2 | Weekly time spent on communications distribution pre-Workvivo (hours) | InterviewsTEI case study | 1010 | 1010 | 1010 |
| B3 | Percentage of time saved on communications distribution with Workvivo | InterviewsTEI case study | 50%50% | 50%50% | 50%50% |
| B4 | Weekly time saved on communications distribution with Workvivo (hours) | B2*B3 | 55 | 55 | 55 |
| B5 | Fully burdened hourly salary for an HR and communications specialist | TEI standard | $29$29 | $29$29 | $29$29 |
| B6 | Subtotal: Efficiency gains for HR and communications teams | (B1*B4*B5*47)*B11 | $681,500 $681,500 | $681,500 $681,500 | $681,500 $681,500 |
| B7 | IT resources who supported the maintenance of the legacy systems | A3*9 FTEs | 9090 | 9090 | 9090 |
| B8 | Weekly time saved on IT support and maintenance (hours) | Forrester assumptionTEI case study | 0.250.25 | 0.250.25 | 0.250.25 |
| B9 | Fully burdened hourly salary for an IT resource | TEI standard | $47$47 | $47$47 | $47$47 |
| B10 | Subtotal: Efficiency gains for IT support | (B7*B8*47*B9)*B11 | $24,851 $24,851 | $24,851 $24,851 | $24,851 $24,851 |
| B11 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50% 50% | 50% 50% | 50% 50% |
| Bt | Efficiency gains for HR, communications, and IT teams | B6+B10 | $706,351 $706,351 | $706,351 $706,351 | $706,351 $706,351 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓5% | ||||
| Btr | Efficiency gains for HR, communications, and IT teams (risk-adjusted) | $671,034 $671,034 | $671,034 $671,034 | $671,034 $671,034 | |
| Three-year total: $2,013,101 $2,013,101 | Three-year present value: $1,668,761 $1,668,761 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees said using Workvivo as a digital hub for all employees enabled their organizations to expand their reach and engage their workforces and that this led to increased retention of frontline employees. Many of the interviewees explained that Workvivo enabled frontline employees to feel connected to the wider organization and more included, often for the first time. They also said it elevated the employee experiences for both frontline and desk workers by creating a sense of community and enabling easy, asynchronous communication that removes language and geographical barriers when connecting. Especially for frontline employees, this often led to augmented internal mobility and lower attrition.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The extent to which an organization realizes this benefit can vary due to the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.4 million.
For , with 0% of total employees comprising the total number of frontline workers and a frontline voluntary attrition rate of 0%, this benefit may have a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of .
The following table shows custom results for .
| Ref | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Frontline employees | CompositeComposite | 45,00045,000 | 45,00045,000 | 45,00045,000 |
| C2 | Voluntary attrition rate | CompositeComposite | 60%60% | 60%60% | 60%60% |
| C3 | Frontline employees who leave | C1*C2 | 27,00027,000 | 27,00027,000 | 27,00027,000 |
| C4 | Reduction in attrition rate for frontline employees due to Workvivo | InterviewsTEI case study | 0.5%0.5% | 0.5%0.5% | 0.5%0.5% |
| C5 | Average fully burdened salary for a frontline employee | TEI standard | $41,000 $41,000 | $41,000 $41,000 | $41,000 $41,000 |
| C6 | Average cost of recruiting, hiring, and onboarding a frontline employee | C5*20% | $8,200 $8,200 | $8,200 $8,200 | $8,200 $8,200 |
| Ct | Improved retention for frontline employees | C3*C4*C6 | $996,300 $996,300 | $996,300 $996,300 | $996,300 $996,300 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓5% | ||||
| Ctr | Improved retention for frontline employees (risk-adjusted) | $946,485 $946,485 | $946,485 $946,485 | $946,485 $946,485 | |
| Three-year total: $2,839,455 $2,839,455 | Three-year present value: $2,353,768 $2,353,768 | ||||
Evidence and data. Senior directors who manage frontline leaders particularly benefited from Workvivo, in so far as they saved time on checking reports on frontline activity. Interviewees shared that department leads with responsibility over frontline employees previously needed to write reports for senior management to review. Senior management therefore had to dedicate time each day to reviewing the mass of emails they would receive from the frontline leaders who reported to them. However, interviewees said that by leveraging the document storage capabilities within Workvivo, senior directors could refer to a single report rather than multiple emails.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The extent to which an organization realizes this benefit can vary due to the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $232,000.
For , this benefit may have a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of .
The following table shows custom results for .
| Ref | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Senior directors who check departmental frontline reports | CompositeScaled to C1 | 2525 | 2525 | 2525 |
| D2 | Daily time saved per manager checking frontline team reports (minutes) | InterviewsTEI case study | 3030 | 3030 | 3030 |
| D3 | Fully burdened hourly salary for a senior director | TEI standard | $77 $77 | $77 $77 | $77 $77 |
| D4 | Cost to business to check frontline reports per day | (D2/60)*D3 | $39 $39 | $39 $39 | $39 $39 |
| D5 | Days worked | TEI standard | 225225 | 225225 | 225225 |
| D6 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50%50% | 50%50% | 50%50% |
| Dt | Productivity savings for senior directors | D1*D4*D5*D6 | $109,688 $109,688 | $109,688 $109,688 | $109,688 $109,688 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||
| Dtr | Productivity savings for senior directors (risk-adjusted) | $93,234 $93,234 | $93,234 $93,234 | $93,234 $93,234 | |
| Three-year total: $279,703 $279,703 | Three-year present value: $231,860 $231,860 | ||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Workvivo and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
| Ref | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etr | Ongoing costs | $0 $0 | $1,386,000 $1,386,000 | $1,457,280 $1,457,280 | $1,528,560 $1,528,560 | $4,371,840 $4,371,840 | $3,612,793 $3,612,793 |
| Ftr | Up-front costs | $48,965 $48,965 | $20,680 $20,680 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 | $69,645 $69,645 | $67,765 $67,765 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $48,965 $48,965 | $1,406,680 $1,406,680 | $1,457,280 $1,457,280 | $1,528,560 $1,528,560 | $4,441,485 $4,441,485 | $3,680,558 $3,680,558 | |
Evidence and data. Licensing costs are informed by volume. Pricing may vary. Contact Workvivo for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.6 million.
For , licensing fees to Workvivo may have a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of .
The following table shows custom results for .
| Ref | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Licensing costs | WorkvivoScaled to total employees | $1,260,000 $1,260,000 | $1,324,800 $1,324,800 | $1,389,600 $1,389,600 | |||
| Et | Ongoing costs | E1 | $1,260,000 $1,260,000 | $1,324,800 $1,324,800 | $1,389,600 $1,389,600 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||||
| Etr | Ongoing costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 $0 | $1,386,000 $1,386,000 | $1,457,280 $1,457,280 | $1,528,560 $1,528,560 | |||
| Three-year total: $4,371,840 $4,371,840 | Three-year present value: $3,612,793 $3,612,793 | |||||||
Evidence and data. Up-front costs are focused on implementation fees and the internal effort required to deploy Workvivo. In general, interviewees from enterprise organizations said they deployed Workvivo in phases.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The impact of this cost can vary due to the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $68,000.
For , implementation costs may have a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of .
The following table shows custom results for .
| Ref | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Implementation fee | Interviews | $5,000 $5,000 | |||
| F2 | HR or communications manager implementation time (hours) | Interviews | 160160 | |||
| F3 | Average fully burdened hourly salary for a communications manager | TEI standard | $35 $35 | |||
| F4 | HR or communications generalist implementation time (hours) | Interviews | 160160 | |||
| F5 | Average fully burdened hourly salary for a communications generalist | TEI standard | $29 $29 | |||
| F6 | Global IT implementation time (hours) | Interviews | 7878 | |||
| F7 | Average fully burdened hourly salary for global IT worker | TEI standard | $58 $58 | |||
| F8 | Legal counsel implementation time (hours) | Interviews | 7070 | |||
| F9 | Average fully burdened hourly salary for legal counsel | TEI standard | $85 $85 | |||
| F10 | Time IT resource spends decommissioning legacy systems (hours) | Assumption | 400400 | 400400 | ||
| F11 | Average fully burdened hourly salary for an IT network and infrastructure worker | TEI standard | $47 $47 | $47 $47 | ||
| Ft | Up-front costs | (F1+(F2*F3)+(F4 *F5)+(F6*F7)+(F 8*F9))+(F10*F11) | $44,514 $44,514 | $18,800 $18,800 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Ftr | Up-front costs (risk-adjusted) | $48,965 $48,965 | $20,680 $20,680 | $0 $0 | $0 $0 | |
| Three-year total: $69,645 $69,645 | Three-year present value: $67,765 $67,765 | |||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($48,965)($48,965) | ($1,406,680)($1,406,680) | ($1,457,280)($1,457,280) | ($1,528,560)($1,528,560) | ($4,441,485)($4,441,485) | ($3,680,558)($3,680,558) |
| Total benefits | $0 $0 | $3,636,753 $3,636,753 | $5,562,753 $5,562,753 | $5,562,753 $5,562,753 | $14,762,259 $14,762,259 | $12,082,834 $12,082,834 |
| Net benefits | ($48,965)($48,965) | $2,230,073 $2,230,073 | $4,105,473 $4,105,473 | $4,034,193 $4,034,193 | $10,320,774 $10,320,774 | $8,402,276 $8,402,276 |
| ROI | 228%228% | |||||
| Payback (months) | <6<6 | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
1 Source: The Intranet Platforms Landscape, Q1 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., January 29, 2024.
2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
3 Source: The Forrester Tech Tide™: Enterprise Collaboration Technologies, Q3 2022, Forrester Research, Inc, September 19, 2022.
4 Source: Make Digital Employee Experience The Centerpiece Of Your Digital Workplace Strategy, Forrester Research, Inc., November 15, 2022.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile
device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website
navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to
another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to
analyze
data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We
may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of
interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help
tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and
web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive
full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not
function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html