February 2025
Human capital management (HCM) suites and financial management tools are essential components for any organization. IT and HR professionals deploy HCM suites to streamline HR processes, manage employee data, and enhance people strategies. Financial management solutions offer a centralized platform for tracking and reporting financial metrics; assessing overall business health; and planning, managing, and automating operational processes.
Workday Human Capital Management (HCM) and Workday Financial Management are integral components of Workday’s cloud-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Workday HCM offers a comprehensive suite of applications for managing an organization’s human resources and workforce operations, facilitating the optimization of human capital throughout the employee lifecycle. Workday Financial Management provides a suite of tools designed to streamline and enhance financial operations, including accounting, budgeting, procurement, and financial planning functions.
Workday commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Workday HCM and Financial Management.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Workday HCM and Financial Management on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits and risks associated with this investment, especially in the retail industry, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Workday HCM and Financial Management. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a retail organization with 640 stores and revenue of $3 billion per year.
Interviewees reported that prior to implementing Workday HCM and Financial Management, their organizations lacked integrated systems for HR, payroll, talent management, workforce management, operations, financial accounting, and financial planning and analysis (FP&A). This fragmentation led to inefficiencies within the HR, finance, and IT teams. Following the investment in Workday HCM and Financial Management, the organizations adopted modern systems that enhanced productivity across IT, HR, and finance departments, as well as among frontline employees and store managers. Key outcomes from this investment included increased profits due to improved frontline workforce optimization, reduced turnover rates, and efficiency gains for managers, HR and financial professionals, and IT team members.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $29.34 million over three years.
Benefits PV
Increased rate of sales per labor hour
Reduced FP&A staff effort on planning
Reduced IT effort due to consolidation
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Workday HCM and Financial Management.
The objective of the framework is to identify the benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Workday HCM and Financial Management can have on an organization.
Interviewed Workday stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Workday HCM and Financial Management.
Interviewed four people at organizations using HCM and Financial Management to obtain data with respect to benefits and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of financial analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Workday and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential benefits that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Workday HCM and Financial Management.
Workday reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Workday provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Chengcheng Dong
Veronica Iles
Marianne Friis
| Role | Industry | Region | Revenue | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head of people, workplace, and controlling | Eyewear retail | Europe | $245 million | 1,300 employees |
| SVP, people services | Apparel retail | HQ in NYC; global operation | $9 billion | 30,000 employees |
| Head of corporate finance and risk | Discount chain retail | Canada | $1.8 billion | 10,000 employees |
| VP, accounting/controller | Automotive retail | US | $450 million | 3,500 employees |
According to interviewees, enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems were vital for their organizations, enhancing efficiency, scalability, and decision-making. Without a modern ERP system, their organizations faced significant challenges in their daily operations.
The interviewees highlighted several common issues, including:
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that could:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and a benefits analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristic:
Description of composite. The global retail organization provides sales, customer support, and service/warranty support for its consumer products in high volume. The organization has a strong brand, global operations, and a large customer base. It has 600 stores globally with 8,000 employees. Among them, there are 6,400 frontline employees and 800 managers. Due to the seasonal demand, the average annual seasonal hiring is 960. The annual revenue is $3 billion.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Profit increases due to better frontline workforce optimization | $1,405,747 | $2,108,621 | $3,162,931 | $6,677,299 | $5,396,971 |
| Btr | Seasonal hiring savings | $576,000 | $768,000 | $960,000 | $2,304,000 | $1,879,609 |
| Ctr | Payroll error reduction | $540,000 | $540,000 | $540,000 | $1,620,000 | $1,342,900 |
| Dtr | Manager productivity improvement | $5,091,840 | $5,091,840 | $5,091,840 | $15,275,520 | $12,662,652 |
| Etr | Employee turnover reduction | $782,680 | $1,293,360 | $2,042,720 | $4,118,760 | $3,315,146 |
| Ftr | FP&A planning and operation efficiency savings | $220,662 | $220,662 | $220,662 | $661,986 | $548,754 |
| Gtr | Recruitment efficiency savings | $877,540 | $877,540 | $877,540 | $2,632,620 | $2,182,312 |
| Htr | IT efficiency savings due to system consolidation | $127,575 | $127,575 | $127,575 | $382,725 | $317,260 |
| Itr | Legacy system retirement savings | $680,000 | $680,000 | $680,000 | $2,040,000 | $1,691,059 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $10,302,044 | $11,707,598 | $13,703,268 | $35,712,910 | $29,336,663 | |
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that workforce optimization involved strategically managing the workforce to align with business goals, maximize productivity, and ensure employee engagement and satisfaction. By deploying Workday, the interviewees’ organizations achieved improved workforce planning and employee scheduling, which was critical for their organizations. A satisfied and engaged frontline workforce directly contributed to higher revenue and profit for the interviewees’ organizations.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.4 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Sales per labor hour before Workday | Composite | $107 | $107 | $107 | |
| A2 | Growth rate of sales per labor hour with Workday | Interviews | 4% | 6% | 8% | |
| A3 | Sales increase per labor hour after Workday | A1*A2 | $4 | $6 | $9 | |
| A4 | Number of frontline employees | Composite | 6,400 | 6,400 | 6,400 | |
| A5 | Total annual sales increase due to better frontline workforce optimization with Workday HCM | A3*A4*2,080 hours | $53,248,000 | $79,872,000 | $119,808,000 | |
| A6 | Net profit margin | Forrester research | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | |
| At | Profit increase due to better frontline workforce optimization | A5*A6 | $1,757,184 | $2,635,776 | $3,953,664 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Atr | Profit increase due to better frontline workforce optimization (risk-adjusted) | $1,405,747 | $2,108,621 | $3,162,931 | ||
| Three-year total: $6,677,299 | Three-year present value: $5,396,971 | |||||
Evidence and data. Seasonal hiring was essential for the interviewees’ retail organizations to meet fluctuating business demands. With the Workday Workforce Planning, the interviewees’ organizations could better predict seasonal variations, balance full-time workloads with appropriate shift assignments, and reduce the need for seasonal hiring.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.9 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Number of seasonal hires before Workday | A4*15% | 960 | 960 | 960 | |
| B2 | Percentage decrease of seasonal hiring due to better scheduling and recruiting with Workday | Interviews | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
| B3 | Number of decreased seasonal hires | B1*B2 | 144 | 192 | 240 | |
| B4 | Average compensation and hiring/training cost per seasonal hire | Composite | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | |
| Bt | Seasonal hiring savings | B3*B4 | $720,000 | $960,000 | $1,200,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Btr | Seasonal hiring savings (risk-adjusted) | $576,000 | $768,000 | $960,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,304,000 | Three-year present value: $1,879,609 | |||||
Evidence and data. Without a robust payroll system, the interviewees’ organizations experienced financial losses due to payroll errors and compromised employee experiences. The administrative burdens also rendered HR and finance teams inefficient.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.3 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Total annual compensation | Composite | $300,000,000 | $300,000,000 | $300,000,000 | |
| C2 | Payroll error rate before Workday | Interviews | 1% | 1% | 1% | |
| C3 | Payroll error rate after Workday | Interviews | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| C4 | Error recapture rate | Assumption | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| Ct | Payroll error reduction | C1*(C2-C3)*C4 | $675,000 | $675,000 | $675,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Ctr | Payroll error reduction (risk-adjusted) | $540,000 | $540,000 | $540,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,620,000 | Three-year present value: $1,342,900 | |||||
Evidence and data. According to interviewees, managers play a critical role at their retail companies, overseeing operations to maximize revenue and making strategic decisions to support long-term growth. Before deploying Workday, the interviewees’ managers spent extensive time on administrative tasks, hindering their ability to focus on strategic initiatives. The interviewee observed significant improvements at their organizations after implementing Workday.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $12.7 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Number of managers | Composite | 800 | 800 | 800 | |
| D2 | Hours saved per manager per week from reduced paperwork with Workday HCM | Interviews | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| D3 | Hours saved per manager per week from self-serve training provided through Workday HCM | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| D4 | Hours saved per manager per week from automating scheduling processes with Workday HCM | Interviews | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| D5 | Total weekly hours savings per manager with Workday HCM | D2+D3+D4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| D6 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a manager | Composite | $34 | $34 | $34 | |
| D7 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Dt | Manager productivity improvement | D1*D5*52 weeks*D6*D7 | $5,657,600 | $5,657,600 | $5,657,600 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | Manager productivity improvement (risk-adjusted) | $5,091,840 | $5,091,840 | $5,091,840 | ||
| Three-year total: $15,275,520 | Three-year present value: $12,662,652 | |||||
Evidence and data. The retail industry has traditionally faced high turnover rates due to various complex factors. However, the implementation of Workday positively impacted the turnover rates in the interviewees’ organizations through the following improvements:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.3 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Number of frontline employees | Composite | 6,400 | 6,400 | 6,400 | |
| E2 | Improvement in turnover rate | Interview | 2% | 3% | 4% | |
| E3 | Frontline employee replacement cost | Composite | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | |
| E4 | Subtotal: Savings on decreased turnover rate of frontline employees | E1*E2*E3 | $640,000 | $960,000 | $1,280,000 | |
| E5 | Number of managers | Composite | 800 | 800 | 800 | |
| E6 | Improvement in turnover rate | Interview | 1% | 2% | 4% | |
| E7 | Fully burdened annual salary for a manager | Composite | $70,200 | $70,200 | $70,200 | |
| E8 | Manager replacement cost | E7*50% | $35,100 | $35,100 | $35,100 | |
| E9 | Subtotal: Savings on decreased turnover rate of managers | E5*E6*E8 | $280,800 | $561,600 | $1,123,200 | |
| Et | Employee turnover reduction | E4+E9 | $920,800 | $1,521,600 | $2,403,200 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Etr | Employee turnover reduction (risk-adjusted) | $782,680 | $1,293,360 | $2,042,720 | ||
| Three-year total: $4,118,760 | Three-year present value: $3,315,146 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted FP&A solutions were critical for their businesses, enhancing efficiency, providing accurate data to the finance department, supporting decision-making processes, and reducing operational risk. Before deploying Workday Financial Management, the interviewees’ organizations faced challenges in forecasting, resource allocation, risk management, and scaling effectively. Their finance teams were bogged down by paperwork and poor interdepartmental collaboration.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $549,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Number of FP&A staff on planning | Composite | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| F2 | Days spent on planning per year before Workday Adaptive Planning | Interviews | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
| F3 | Percentage of time saved with Workday Adaptive Planning | Interviews | 65% | 65% | 65% | |
| F4 | Days saved with Workday Adaptive Planning per employee | F2*F3 | 130 | 130 | 130 | |
| F5 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an FP&A staff | Composite | $41 | $41 | $41 | |
| F6 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| F7 | Subtotal: Savings on planning with Workday Adaptive Planning | F1*F4*F5*8 hours*F6 | $63,960 | $63,960 | $63,960 | |
| F8 | Number of FP&A staff on payments, core accounting, and tax | Composite | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| F9 | Days spent on payments, core accounting, and tax before Workday Financial Management | Interviews | 120 | 120 | 120 | |
| F10 | Percentage of time saved with Workday Financial Management | Interviews | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| F11 | Subtotal: Savings on payments, core accounting, and tax with Workday Financial Management | F8*F9*F10*F5*8 hours *F6 | $177,120 | $177,120 | $177,120 | |
| F12 | Hours spent on auditing per year before Workday Financial Management | Composite | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
| F13 | Percentage of time saved with Workday Financial Management | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| F14 | Subtotal: Savings on auditing with Workday Financial Management | F12*F13*F5 | $4,100 | $4,100 | $4,100 | |
| Ft | FP&A planning and operation efficiency savings | F7+F11+F14 | $245,180 | $245,180 | $245,180 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ftr | FP&A planning and operation efficiency savings (risk-adjusted) | $220,662 | $220,662 | $220,662 | ||
| Three-year total: $661,986 | Three-year present value: $548,754 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees reported that their retail organizations frequently hired employees, involving both corporate HR teams and store managers. Workday Recruiting provided the interviewees’ organizations with an end-to-end solution, streamlining the process for HR and store managers to efficiently acquire the talent they need.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.2 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Number of HR FTEs | Composite | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| G2 | Percentage of effort spent on employee documentation preparation before Workday | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| G3 | Percentage of time saved on documentation preparation with Workday | Interviews | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| G4 | Fully burdened annual salary for an HR FTE | Composite | $81,000 | $81,000 | $81,000 | |
| G5 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| G6 | Subtotal: Recruiter efficiency savings | G1*G2*G3*G4*G5 | $162,000 | $162,000 | $162,000 | |
| G7 | Number of store managers | Composite | 640 | 640 | 640 | |
| G8 | Hours spent on recruitment before Workday in hours per year | Interviews | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
| G9 | Percentage of time savings on recruitment with Workday | Interviews | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| G10 | Fully burdened annual salary for a store manager | Composite | $34 | $34 | $34 | |
| G11 | Subtotal: Store manager time savings on recruitment | G7*G8*G9*G10*G5 | $870,400 | $870,400 | $870,400 | |
| Gt | Recruitment efficiency savings | G6+G11 | $1,032,400 | $1,032,400 | $1,032,400 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Gtr | Recruitment efficiency savings (risk-adjusted) | $877,540 | $877,540 | $877,540 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,632,620 | Three-year present value: $2,182,312 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees’ organizations realized IT efficiency savings due to solution consolidation with Workday’s HCM and Financial Management solutions. They no longer needed to maintain relationships with multiple vendors. The IT team could manage the system through a single pane of glass, maintaining consistency across different departments. Troubleshooting tasks became more uniform across modules, and vendor relationships were easier to manage. The SVP of people services from the apparel retail organization shared: “We definitely have savings on duplicate configurations. You take any area trying to do this once in Workday and doing it again in another system is inefficient. I think there were like two or three people there and I think we’ve got some of those roles out.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $317,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Number of IT technicians on payroll, HR, and finance systems before Workday | Composite | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| H2 | Percentage of effort savings after Workday | Interviews | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
| H3 | Fully burdened annual salary for an IT technician | Composite | $135,000 | $135,000 | $135,000 | |
| H4 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Ht | IT efficiency savings due to system consolidation | H1*H2*H3*H4 | $141,750 | $141,750 | $141,750 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Htr | IT efficiency savings due to system consolidation (risk-adjusted) | $127,575 | $127,575 | $127,575 | ||
| Three-year total: $382,725 | Three-year present value: $317,260 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees’ organizations were able to retire their legacy systems related to payroll, HR, and finance after the full deployment of Workday HCM and Financial Management. Most of the legacy systems were on a licensing model so the decommission saved the interviewees’ organizations from the ongoing cost. The head of people, workplace, and controlling from the eyewear retail organization reported a $35,000 savings on one legacy system licensing fee. The VP of accounting/controller from the automotive retail organization shared that they were able to save $150,000 on one tool among the multiple tools they retired and reallocate nine people who were using and maintaining those legacy systems.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the licensing fee of the retired legacy systems is $800,000 per year. With the deployment of Workday, this cost can be saved entirely.
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may reduce or slow recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.7 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | Annual cost of retired payroll, HR, and finance systems | Composite | $800,000 | $800,000 | $800,000 | |
| It | Legacy system retirement savings | I1 | $800,000 | $800,000 | $800,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Itr | Legacy system retirement savings (risk-adjusted) | $680,000 | $680,000 | $680,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,040,000 | Three-year present value: $1,691,059 | |||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility of Workday is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Workday HCM and Financial Management and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
All cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total benefit estimate. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
2 Jitender Miglani, US Retail Industry Sales And Profits Trends, 2001-2022: Steady Growth, Forrester Blogs.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html