A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Wedia, June 2024
Global creative, marketing, and brand leaders use digital asset management (DAM) solutions to centralize and govern rich-media assets throughout their organizations’ content lifecycles. As companies migrate to digital business models, content teams are heavily relying on DAM solutions as a foundational technology to increase operational efficiencies and simultaneously increase top-line revenue growth through higher-performing digital assets on the edge.
Companies utilize DAM platforms to store, organize, share, and distribute their digital media assets such as videos, images, sound recordings, and marketing templates. Wedia’s DAM platform helps clients manage the complexity of their digital assets and support their business objectives: marketing, sales, and general brand awareness. Wedia integrates emerging technologies like generative AI (genAI) into its DAM platform. Simultaneously, it is capable of storing large volumes of content and responding to the changing needs of large, international companies.
Wedia commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) companies may realize by deploying Wedia’s DAM platform.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of DAM on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four representatives with experience using Wedia’s DAM platform. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a retail and consumer goods organization with revenue of $10 billion per year.
Interviewees said that prior to using Wedia’s DAM platform, their organizations’ libraries or internal networks with the assets were not centralized, and each country had its own means of storing assets. The usage of legacy DAM systems with limited functionalities led to multiple challenges, such as: a lack of integration to build connections with internal systems; insufficient customizability for asset templates; a manual workload to upload, download, and search for assets and to fix technical errors with the prior platform; poor user experiences; and silos within the organizations.
These limitations prevented the companies from scaling up their assets, having strong collaboration across countries due to the lack of a single source of truth or centralized platform, and dedicating the majority of FTEs’ time and effort to fixing technical errors rather than developing the previous platform to be more relevant to the organization’s requirements.
After the investment in Wedia’s DAM platform, the companies moved to having a centralized repository of all assets that can be shared across the organization. Wedia’s DAM platform allows organizations to have unlimited volumes of assets and users. Key results from the investment include more effective collaboration across functional teams, ease in asset search and management of visuals, higher customizability with Wedia’s DAM platform to better meet evolving needs, and the ability to reuse assets across subsidiaries.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $5.98 million over three years versus costs of $1.12 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $4.86 million and an ROI of 434%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Wedia’s DAM platform.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Wedia’s DAM platform can have on an organization.
Interviewed Wedia stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Wedia’s DAM platform.
Interviewed four representatives at organizations using Wedia’s DAM platform to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Wedia and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Wedia’s DAM platform.
Wedia reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Wedia provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Aashish Sharma
Tanvi Dahiya
| Role | Industry | Region | Employees | Revenue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global corporate brand manager | Pharmaceutical and crop science | Headquarters in Europe with operations in EMEA, North America, APAC, South America | 100,000 | $50B | |
| Manager of PIM/DAM/data transformation | Automotive and manufacturing | Headquarters in Europe with operations in EMEA, North America, APAC, South America | 132,200 | $29B | |
| Digital project manager, DAM | Agri-food | Headquarters in Europe with operations in EMEA, North America, APAC, South America | 20,000 | $7B | |
| Application manager | Retail | Headquarters in Europe with operations in EMEA, North America, APAC, South America | 130,000 | $15B | |
Prior to using Wedia’s DAM platform, the interviewees’ organizations had internal networks and libraries in multiple geographies that housed their rich-media assets. There was no single source of truth or centralized repository. The previous platforms were outdated and created many technical challenges as certain functionalities did not fully work.
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a platform that could:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the four interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The global $10 billion retail and consumer services organization is headquartered in Europe while operating across EMEA, North America, Asia Pacific, and South America. The composite has a total of 100 brands across the globe and 70,000 employees who have to collaborate across different regions to ensure efficient operational processes and maintain a consistent and strong brand image across all regions and markets.
Deployment characteristics. The composite has 500,000 assets in Wedia’s DAM, and 30,000 employees are users. The primary users of the DAM are across three departments: marketing, sales, and communication. One thousand registered external users such as journalists and outsourced consultants also have access to the DAM to find assets.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Business value generated by efficient management of visuals | $1,170,000 | $1,170,000 | $1,170,000 | $3,510,000 | $2,909,617 |
| Btr | Reduced asset creation cost via digital rights management and templating | $900,000 | $900,000 | $900,000 | $2,700,000 | $2,238,167 |
| Ctr | Cost savings due to modern SaaS platform | $152,250 | $152,250 | $152,250 | $456,750 | $378,623 |
| Dtr | Faster time to market through easier asset findability | $108,000 | $108,000 | $108,000 | $324,000 | $268,580 |
| Etr | Cost savings for asset storage | $75,000 | $75,000 | $75,000 | $225,000 | $186,514 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $2,405,250 | $2,405,250 | $2,405,250 | $7,215,750 | $5,981,501 | |
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that their organizations’ marketing teams became more efficient in managing visuals with Wedia’s DAM platform compared to with their previous platforms. Previously, they were required to manage a large number of visual variations to ensure that their brands maintain visual consistency across all the media, channels, and markets. One interviewee expressed: “Our marketing teams no longer need to spend all their time managing visuals. They can use this time to do other marketing tasks that provide more value.”
One interviewee reported that prior to using Wedia’s DAM platform, each of their organization’s 500 marketing FTEs previously spent 50% of their time managing visuals but that with Wedia, they only spend 5% of their time managing visuals.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. New business value generated with increased efficiency for marketing teams to manage visuals may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.9 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Total marketing FTEs | Composite | 400 | 400 | 400 | |||
| A2 | Percentage of time each FTE required to manage visuals before Wedia’s DAM platform | Interviews | 30% | 30% | 30% | |||
| A3 | Percentage time each FTE requires to manage visuals with Wedia’s DAM platform | Interviews | 5% | 5% | 5% | |||
| A4 | Total working hours per FTE | TEI standard | 2,080 | 2,080 | 2,080 | |||
| A5 | Average hourly rate for a marketing FTE | TEI standard | $15.00 | $15.00 | $15.00 | |||
| A6 | Efficiency before Wedia’s DAM platform | A1*A2*A4*A5 | $3,744,000.00 | $3,744,000.00 | $3,744,000.00 | |||
| A7 | Efficiency with Wedia’s DAM platform | A1*A3*A4*A5 | $624,000.00 | $624,000.00 | $624,000.00 | |||
| A8 | Percentage captured | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
| At | Business value generated by efficient management of visuals | (A6-A7)*A8 | $1,560,000 | $1,560,000 | $1,560,000 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↓25% | |||||||
| Atr | Business value generated by efficient management of visuals (risk-adjusted) | $1,170,000 | $1,170,000 | $1,170,000 | ||||
| Three-year total: $3,510,000 | Three-year present value: $2,909,617 | |||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees’ organizations were able to use Wedia’s DAM platform to avoid recreating assets, and they instead reused their assets from a single subsidiary in other big and global subsidiaries. Interviewees mentioned that in order to reuse their assets in other subsidiaries, they just had to negotiate rights and use a template to reuse assets. In turn, this cost much less than having to duplicate effort to recreate assets for each subsidiary individually.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Reduced total cost of creating assets through digital rights management and templating capabilities may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.2 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Total big and global subsidiaries | Composite | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||
| B2 | Average number of new visuals per subsidiary | Composite | 300 | 300 | 300 | |||
| B3 | Average cost of producing a visual per subsidiary before Wedia’s DAM platform | Composite | $600 | $600 | $600 | |||
| B4 | Total cost of producing all visuals across all subsidiaries before Wedia’s DAM platform | B1*B2*B3 | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | |||
| B5 | Total cost of producing reusing visuals across all subsidiaries due to negotiating rights with Wedia’s DAM platform (rounded) | B4*33.33% | $600,000 | $600,000 | $600,000 | |||
| Bt | Reduced asset creation cost via digital rights management and templating | B4-B5 | $1,200,000 | $1,200,000 | $1,200,000 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↓25% | |||||||
| Btr | Reduced asset creation cost via digital rights management and templating (risk-adjusted) | $900,000 | $900,000 | $900,000 | ||||
| Three-year total: $2,700,000 | Three-year present value: $2,238,167 | |||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that before investing in Wedia’s DAM platform, their organizations spent a lot of time correcting issues in their legacy DAMs rather than customizing them for their benefit. As a result, they never got to experience the full breadth of DAM features and functionalities to optimize their usage. But interviewees said that partnering with Wedia led to their organizations hosting internal meetings and meetings with Wedia that were solely focused on how to further develop their DAM platforms rather than fixing technical errors. Moreover, with a SaaS platform, they no longer incurred expensive maintenance costs.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Cost savings due to modern SaaS platform may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $379,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Total departments across all brands that primarily use Wedia’s DAM platform | Composite | 300 | 300 | 300 | |||
| C2 | FTEs saved from reduction in technical issues | Interviews | 60 | 60 | 60 | |||
| C3 | Average hourly rate for a contributor | TEI standard | $17.00 | $17.00 | $17.00 | |||
| C4 | Subtotal: Cost savings due to reduced technical issues | C1*C2*C3*C8 | $306,000.00 | $306,000.00 | $306,000.00 | |||
| C5 | Retainer services that needed to be paid per year before Wedia’s DAM platform | Interviews | $70,000.00 | $70,000.00 | $70,000.00 | |||
| C6 | Retainer services that need to be paid per year with Wedia’s DAM platform | Interviews | $20,000.00 | $20,000.00 | $20,000.00 | |||
| C7 | Subtotal: Cost saving from reduction in retainer services | C4-C5 | $50,000 | $50,000 | $50,000 | |||
| C8 | Percentage captured | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
| Ct | Cost savings due to modern SaaS platform | (C4*C8)+C7 | $203,000 | $203,000 | $203,000 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↓25% | |||||||
| Ctr | Cost savings due to modern SaaS platform (risk-adjusted) | $152,250 | $152,250 | $152,250 | ||||
| Three-year total: $456,750 | Three-year present value: $378,623 | |||||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees found that with Wedia’s DAM platform, their organizations’ sales FTEs spent less time searching for assets as compared to with their previous platforms. As a result, they achieved faster time to market and efficiency gains from this benefit.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Faster time to market through easier asset findability may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $269,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Sales FTEs | Composite | 500 | 500 | 500 | |||
| D2 | Average hourly rate for a sales FTE | TEI standard | $20.00 | $20.00 | $20.00 | |||
| D3 | Subtotal for all sales FTEs | D1*D2 | $10,000.00 | $10,000.00 | $10,000.00 | |||
| D4 | Average time spent searching for assets per sales FTE prior to Wedia’s DAM platform (hours) | Composite | 72 | 72 | 72 | |||
| D5 | Average clicks needed per FTE per month to find assets in the internal network before Wedia’s DAM platform | Interviews | 147 | 147 | 147 | |||
| D6 | Average clicks needed per FTE per month to find assets with Wedia's DAM platform | Interviews | 84 | 84 | 84 | |||
| D7 | Percentage of time saved with Wedia’s DAM platform for searching assets | (D5-D6)/D5 | 40% | 40% | 40% | |||
| D8 | Percentage captured | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
| Dt | Faster time to market through easier asset findability | D3*D4*D7*D8 | $144,000 | $144,000 | $144,000 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↓25% | |||||||
| Dtr | Faster time to market through easier asset findability (risk-adjusted) | $108,000 | $108,000 | $108,000 | ||||
| Three-year total: $324,000 | Three-year present value: $268,580 | |||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees mentioned that Wedia helped their organizations build connectors with a stock image library, enabling them to license high-quality 3D models, videos, music, photographs, vectors, and illustrations. With the connectors came opportunities to share assets licensed by other units. Interviewees said all assets bought on the stock image library are automatically transferred into Wedia’s DAM platform along with all the relevant metadata, including asset rights, as part of a centralized library. Organizations can therefore benefit from one universal asset right for all their assets.
One interviewee from the pharmaceutical and crop science industry said that before Wedia, their organization had separate licenses for each country to upload assets. But with Wedia, the organization has a single global contract to license materials that can be used globally across the whole organization.
The same interviewee stated: “The cost savings from the opened space meant that other business units such as research and global communications were able to build up their own assets. In our organization, we have been able to save roughly $500,000 as a result of this benefit.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Cost savings for asset storage may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $187,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Cost savings due to reduction in need for storage space | Interviews | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |||
| Et | Cost savings for asset storage | Interviews | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↓25% | |||||||
| Etr | Cost savings for asset storage (risk-adjusted) | $75,000 | $75,000 | $75,000 | ||||
| Three-year total: $225,000 | Three-year present value: $186,514 | |||||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Wedia’s DAM platform and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | Total subscription/licensing fees | $0 | $198,880 | $217,580 | $238,150 | $654,610 | $539,544 |
| Gtr | Total planning, integration, and implementation cost | $232,902 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $232,902 | $232,902 |
| Htr | Internal costs of maintenance, DAM ownership, and data migration/cleaning | $5,000 | $137,500 | $137,500 | $137,500 | $417,500 | $346,942 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $237,902 | $336,380 | $355,080 | $375,650 | $1,305,012 | $1,119,388 | |
Evidence and data. The up-front costs of licensing/subscription for Wedia’s DAM platform are annual and recurring. The pricing model of Wedia is based on the total number of active users or power users. These are the users who have the rights to edit information on Wedia’s DAM platform. However, there can be unlimited users and assets.
Pricing may vary. Contact Wedia for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Licensing/subscription costs of Wedia’s DAM platform may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $540,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Total licensing cost for all contributors/administrators | Interviews | $0 | $170,000 | $187,000 | $205,700 | ||||
| F2 | Cost of Wedia Content Picker (Microsoft Office edition) | Interviews | $0 | $10,800 | $10,800 | $10,800 | ||||
| Ft | Total subscription/licensing fees | F1+F2 | $0 | $180,800 | $197,800 | $216,500 | ||||
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||||||
| Ftr | Total subscription/licensing fees (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $198,880 | $217,580 | $238,150 | |||||
| Three-year total: $654,610 | Three-year present value: $539,544 | |||||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees said their organizations typically used an agile methodology to implement Wedia’s DAM platform. Each phase of the implementation process was segregated into a sprint and then the organizations required multiple sprints to run the platform and customize its features to optimize benefits. Interviewees said their organizations used the following springs during five-month implementation processes:
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Total planning, integration, and implementation costs of Wedia’s DAM platform may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $233,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Cost of onboarding sprint | Interviews | $25,000 | |||||||
| G2 | Cost of refining sprint | Interviews | $30,000 | |||||||
| G3 | Cost of third-party platforms and integrations sprint | Interviews | $30,000 | |||||||
| G4 | Subtotal: Total external cost charged by Wedia | H1+H2+H3 | $85,000 | |||||||
| G5 | Time taken to implement Wedia’s DAM platform (hours) | Interviews | 840 | |||||||
| G6 | DAM product owners involved in implementation process (FTEs) | Interviews | 1 | |||||||
| G7 | Average hourly rate for a DAM project manager | TEI standard | $33.95 | |||||||
| G8 | Marketing directors involved in implementation process (FTEs) | Interviews | 0.6 | |||||||
| G9 | Average hourly rate for a marketing director | TEI standard | $21.48 | |||||||
| G10 | IT FTEs involved in implementation process | Interview | 0.5 | |||||||
| G11 | Average hourly rate for an IT FTE | TEI standard | $20.90 | |||||||
| G12 | Security team FTEs involved in implementation process | Interviews | 0.3 | |||||||
| G13 | Average hourly rate for a security FTE | TEI standard | $31.41 | |||||||
| G14 | Digital librarians involved in implementation process (FTEs) | Interviews | 1.0 | |||||||
| G15 | Average hourly rate for a digital librarian | TEI standard | $20.19 | |||||||
| G16 | Content managers involved in implementation process (FTEs) | Interviews | 1.0 | |||||||
| G17 | Average hourly rate for a content manager | TEI standard | $23.32 | |||||||
| G18 | Total integrated applications product owners involved in implementation process (FTEs) | Interviews | 0.4 | |||||||
| G19 | Average hourly rate for an integrated applications product owner | TEI standard | $26.00 | |||||||
| G20 | Subtotal: Total internal planning, training, and implementation cost | G5*((G6*G7)+(G8 *G9)+(G10*G11)+ (G12*G13)+(G14* G15)+(G16*G17)+ (G18*G19)) | $101,322 | |||||||
| Gt | Total internal costs related to planning, integration, and implementation | G4+G20 | $186,322 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||
| Risk adjustment | ↑25% | |||||||||
| Gtr | Total internal costs related to planning, integration, and implementation (risk-adjusted) | $232,902 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||
| Three-year total: $232,902 | Three-year present value: $232,902 | |||||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees’ organizations incurred internal costs due to taking DAM ownership from Wedia while still having to move assets stuck in prior outsourced or legacy platforms.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
Risks. Internal costs related to maintenance, DAM ownership, and data migration/cleaning costs of Wedia’s DAM platform may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $347,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Cost of DAM ownership | Interviews | $0 | $90,000 | $90,000 | $90,000 | ||||
| H2 | Cost of data migration and cleaning | Interviews | $0 | $20,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 | ||||
| H3 | Cost of change management/training | Interviews | $5,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||
| Ht | Internal costs of maintenance, DAM ownership, and data migration/cleaning | H1+H2+H3 | $5,000 | $110,000 | $110,000 | $110,000 | ||||
| Risk adjustment | ↑25% | |||||||||
| Htr | Internal costs of maintenance, DAM ownership, and data migration/cleaning (risk-adjusted) | $5,000 | $137,500 | $137,500 | $137,500 | |||||
| Three-year total: $417,500 | Three-year present value: $346,942 | |||||||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($237,902) | ($336,380) | ($355,080) | ($375,650) | ($1,305,012) | ($1,119,388) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $2,405,250 | $2,405,250 | $2,405,250 | $7,215,750 | $5,981,501 |
| Net benefits | ($237,902) | $2,068,870 | $2,050,170 | $2,029,600 | $5,910,738 | $4,862,113 |
| ROI | 434% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the platform.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html