A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Varonis, April 2024
Organizations today face security and data risks virtually everywhere, and those risks increase exponentially as generative AI (genAI) becomes more widely adopted. Excessive user permissions offer fertile ground for attackers in search of sensitive data (e.g., personal information, credit card numbers, intellectual property) for exploitation and malicious use. Emails, files, and content that employees work with daily also often contain sensitive business or personal data.
To remediate excessive access issues without interrupting business continuity, organizations require a solution that can intelligently remove access at scale based on which users need and use their granted access. To tackle sensitive data-exposure issues, companies need a tool to scan, classify, and monitor sensitive data to know where it lives, who has access to it, and who is accessing it. With this information, they can implement and maintain a least-privilege model and maintain a data-centric security policy to prevent and mitigate damage from cyberattacks, be in a position to safely adopt genAI, and meet regulatory compliance requirements.
The Varonis Data Security Platform stops and prevents cyberattacks by taking a data-centric approach to security. Varonis scans on-prem and cloud environments to automatically discover, classify, and label sensitive data, analyze permissions, and remediate excessive access to limit the impact of cyberattacks, manage the posture of cloud apps to proactively close security gaps, and monitor user and device behavior to detect and stop threats. The cloud-native platform uses machine learning and automation to detect threats and rapidly remediate data exposure, ultimately reducing risk and enabling compliance. Varonis’ rapid deployment delivers quantifiable data security outcomes with minimal manual effort. Even when users are not logged in, Varonis is classifying more data, correctly setting user permissions, enforcing policies, and triggering alerts for its incident response team to review on behalf of its customers.
Varonis commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Varonis.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Varonis on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four representatives with experience using Varonis solutions, including: Varonis for Windows File Shares and NAS, Varonis for Microsoft 365, and Varonis for Active Directory, for Varonis for Salesforce. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that generates approximately $900 million in annual revenue and has 2,500 employees, 105TB of data, and 3.3 million folders with file and data assets that have access and sharing available that may become a vulnerability.
Interviewees said that prior to using Varonis, their organizations suffered from excessive access, overexposed sensitive and critical data, and over-permissioned users. Some interviewees’ organizations had experienced data breaches that led to significant financial loss and organizational, technological, and business disruption.
Interviewees said after the investment in Varonis, their organizations gained visibility into user access, obtained significantly greater understanding of issues and their causes, accelerated threat notification, optimized the ability to remediate threats and incidents, and reduced data breaches and security risks.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $4.3 million over three years versus costs of $817,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $3.4 million and an ROI of 421%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment Varonis.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Varonis can have on an organization.
Forrester Consulting conducted an online survey of 351 cybersecurity leaders at global enterprises in the US, the UK, Canada, Germany, and Australia. Survey participants included managers, directors, VPs, and C-level executives who are responsible for cybersecurity decision-making, operations, and reporting. Questions provided to the participants sought to evaluate leaders' cybersecurity strategies and any breaches that have occurred within their organizations. Respondents opted into the survey via a third-party research panel, which fielded the survey on behalf of Forrester in November 2020.
Interviewed Varonis stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Varonis.
Interviewed four representatives at organizations using Varonis to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Varonis and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Varonis.
Varonis reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Varonis provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Roger Nauth
| Role | Industry | Region | Revenue | Employees | No. of files |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systems infrastructure manager | Chemical manufacturing | United States | $701M | 1,300 | 30,000 |
| VP of information technology | Residential construction | United States | $1.7B | 800 | N/A |
| Group CIO | Financial, operational, and strategic consulting | Europe | $275M | 1,000 | N/A |
| CIO | Education administration | United States | N/A | 7,000 | 37,000 |
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with similar challenges, including:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the four interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite is a large, mid-market to enterprise corporation based in the United States that generates more than $900 million in annual revenue and has 2,500 employees with approximately 50 IT professionals. It has approximately 105TB of data and 3.3 million folders in which there are 34 million files, many containing sensitive data. The organization has already deployed Varonis solutions including Varonis for Windows File Shares and NAS, Varonis for Microsoft 365, and Varonis for Active Directory.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Reduced risk and cost of a security breach | $946,838 | $946,838 | $946,838 | $2,840,513 | $2,354,645 |
| Btr | Increased productivity with automated remediation | $1,234,430 | $411,493 | $411,493 | $2,057,415 | $1,771,446 |
| Ctr | Decreased security incident investigation time | $54,150 | $54,150 | $54,150 | $162,450 | $134,663 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $2,235,418 | $1,412,480 | $1,412,480 | $5,060,378 | $4,260,754 | |
Evidence and data. Interviewees highlighted several ways in which using the Varonis platform reduced the risk of a security breach at their organizations:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The value of this benefit can vary across organizations due to the following:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.4 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Probability of experiencing one or more breaches per year | Forrester research | 77% | 77% | 77% | |
| A2 | Mean cumulative cost of one or more breaches per year | Forrester research | $3,506,000 | $3,506,000 | $3,506,000 | |
| A3 | Percent of external and internal attacks on organizational data and folder assets | Forrester research | 43.3% | 43.3% | 43.3% | |
| A4 | Risk exposure from external and internal attacks on organizational data | A1*A2*A3 | $1,168,935 | $1,168,935 | $1,168,935 | |
| A5 | Reduced exposure by remediating excessive access | Interviews | 75% | 75% | 75% | |
| A6 | Reduced exposure by improving detection and response practices | Interviews | 15% | 15% | 15% | |
| A7 | Reduced risk of breaches from external and internal attacks on organizational data | A5+A6 | 90% | 90% | 90% | |
| At | Reduced risk and cost of a security breache | A4*A7 | $1,052,042 | $1,052,042 | $1,052,042 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Reduced risk and cost of a security breach (risk-adjusted) | $946,838 | $946,838 | $946,838 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,840,513 | Three-year present value: $2,354,645 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees highlighted several ways in which Varonis improves their organizations’ ability to remediate excessive access:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The value of this benefit can vary across organizations due to the following:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.1 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Total folders with files and data with potential access and sharing capabilities monitored by Varonis | Composite | 3,300,000 | 1,100,000 | 1,100,000 |
| B2 | Percent of folders with access and sharing vulnerabilities | Composite | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| B3 | Folders with files and data that have access or sharing vulnerabilities and should be remediated | B1*B2 | 49,500 | 16,500 | 16,500 |
| B4 | Percent of access and sharing vulnerabilities that were remediated before using Varonis | Composite | 15% | 15% | 15% |
| B5 | Folders with files and data that were remediated before using Varonis | B3*B4 | 7,425 | 2,475 | 2,475 |
| B6 | Time per folder required to identify and remediate excessive access and sharing before Varonis (hours) | Interviews | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| B7 | Subtotal: Total time spent remediating excessive access and sharing before using Varonis (hours) | B5*B6 | 25,988 | 8,663 | 8,663 |
| B8 | Fully burdened hourly rate of a network or security employee responsible for excessive access remediation | TEI standard | $50 | $50 | $50 |
| Bt | Increased productivity with automated remediation | B7*B8 | $1,299,400 | $433,150 | $433,150 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓5% | ||||
| Btr | Increased productivity with automated remediation (risk-adjusted) | $1,234,430 | $411,493 | $411,493 | |
| Three-year total: $2,057,415 | Three-year present value: $1,771,446 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees highlighted several ways the Varonis platform improved their organizations’ threat detection workflows:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The value of this benefit can vary across organizations due to the following:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $135,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Security incidents investigated | Interviews | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| C2 | Average time spent investigating security incidents without Varonis (hours) | Interviews | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| C3 | Percentage of time savings from investigating incidents with Varonis | Interviews | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| C4 | Average time spent investigating security incidents with Varonis (hours) | C2*(1-C3) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| C5 | Hourly compensation of a security analyst responsible for alert investigation | TEI standard | $50 | $50 | $50 |
| Ct | Decreased security incident investigation time | C1*(C2-C4)*C5 | $57,000 | $57,000 | $57,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓5% | ||||
| Ctr | Decreased security incident investigation time (risk-adjusted) | $54,150 | $54,150 | $54,150 | |
| Three-year total: $162,450 | Three-year present value: $134,663 | ||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Varonis and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtr | Varonis license costs | $0 | $323,841 | $323,841 | $323,841 | $971,523 | $805,345 |
| Etr | Implementation and management of Varonis | $3,255 | $3,465 | $3,465 | $3,465 | $13,650 | $11,872 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $3,255 | $327,306 | $327,306 | $327,306 | $985,173 | $817,217 | |
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The value of this cost can vary across organizations due to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $805,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Cost of Varonis for Windows/NAS+M365 (SaaS) | Composite | $105 | $105 | $105 | ||
| D2 | Quantity of Varonis for Windows/NAS+M365 (SaaS) | Composite | 2,501 | 2,501 | 2,501 | ||
| D3 | ACV for Varonis for Windows/NAS+M365 (SaaS) | D1*D2 | $262,605 | $262,605 | $262,605 | ||
| D4 | Cost of Varonis for Active Directory (SaaS) | Composite | $15 | $15 | $15 | ||
| D5 | Quantity of Varonis for Active Directory (SaaS) | Composite | 2,501 | 2,501 | 2,501 | ||
| D6 | ACV for Varonis for Active Directory (SaaS) | D4*D5 | $37,515 | $37,515 | $37,515 | ||
| D7 | Collectors price per user | Composite | $2,075.00 | $2,075.00 | $2,075.00 | ||
| D8 | Collectors | Composite | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||
| D9 | Collectors total | D7*D8 | $8,300 | $8,300 | $8,300 | ||
| Dt | Varonis license costs | D3+D6+D9 | $0 | $308,420 | $308,420 | $308,420 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | ||||||
| Dtr | Varonis license costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $323,841 | $323,841 | $323,841 | ||
| Three-year total: $971,523 | Three-year present value: $805,345 | ||||||
Evidence and data. The VP of information technology at a residential construction company told Forrester: “Quite frankly, [the cost of implementation and management] was very reasonable having done multiple implementations and professional services. [There were] minimal costs on our end. It was plug and play. It [required] three or four resources. [It] probably took us not even full time —two months, maybe.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The value of this cost can vary across organizations due to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $12,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | FTEs dedicated to managing the system | Composite | 2 | ||||
| E2 | Total time spent implementing Varonis (hours) | Composite | 16 | ||||
| E3 | Hourly compensation of a dedicated FTE | TEI standard | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | |
| E4 | Cost to implement Varonis | E1*E2*E3 | $1,600 | ||||
| E5 | Training time to use Varonis (hours) | Composite | 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| E6 | FTEs involved in training | Composite | 2 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
| E7 | Cost to train employees on Varonis | E3*E5*E6 | $1,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 | |
| E8 | FTEs dedicated to managing the system | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| E9 | Time spent managing the system annually (hours) | Composite | 8 | 8 | 8 | ||
| E10 | Cost to manage Varonis | E3*E8*E9 | $800 | $800 | $800 | ||
| Et | Implementation and management of Varonis | E4+E7+E10 | $3,100 | $3,300 | $3,300 | $3,300 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | ||||||
| Etr | Implementation and management of Varonis (risk-adjusted) | $3,255 | $3,465 | $3,465 | $3,465 | ||
| Three-year total: $13,650 | Three-year present value: $11,872 | ||||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI and NPV for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI and NPV values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($3,255) | ($327,306) | ($327,306) | ($327,306) | ($985,173) | ($817,217) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $2,235,418 | $1,412,480 | $1,412,480 | $5,060,378 | $4,260,754 |
| Net benefits | ($3,255) | $1,908,112 | $1,085,174 | $1,085,174 | $4,075,205 | $3,443,537 |
| ROI | 421% | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Related Forrester Research
The Forrester Wave: Data Security Platforms, Q1 2023, Forrester Research, Inc., March 22, 2023.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
2 Source: Forrester Consulting Cost Of A Cybersecurity Breach Survey, Q1 2021.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile
device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website
navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to
another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze
data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We
may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of
interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help
tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and
web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive
full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not
function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.