Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of The Twilio Platform

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Twilio

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Twilio, April 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of The Twilio Platform

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Twilio, April 2026

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Twilio

Forrester Print Hero Background
T
B
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Customers expect to interact with businesses across a growing number of channels, such as SMS, voice, email, WhatsApp, rich communication services (RCS), and video, and they expect personalized and consistent interactions no matter the channel. Some organizations have addressed this demand incrementally, acquiring separate point solutions for each channel over time, which has resulted in fragmented infrastructure. There is a market need for an API-driven customer engagement platform that consolidates channels and customer data, connects them to a shared layer, and lets organizations embed customer interactions without managing dozens of vendor relationships.

Twilio is a global customer engagement platform (CEP) that enables companies to use communications channel APIs (messaging, WhatsApp, email, voice, chat, etc.) with AI and data. This flexible, programmatic approach adds intelligence and security to many engagement use cases, including every customer journey stage (from sales to marketing to growth) and customer service functions. By building with Twilio, organizations can replace disconnected point solutions and siloed data with a unified platform where every communication and customer interaction is connected. This extensible architecture enables builders to continuously improve and scale engagement strategies as their business evolves.

Twilio commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Twilio.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Twilio on their organizations.

190%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$12.5M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers at four organizations with experience using Twilio. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which has $1 billion in annual revenue and 3,000 employees.

Interviewees said that prior to Twilio, their organizations were challenged with inconsistent and siloed customer data from operating a disjointed set of point solutions, such as legacy SMS aggregators for messaging, standalone one-time password (OTP) providers for authentication, on-prem contact centers that required professional services hours to customize, and separate email platforms. This fragmentation meant sales and customer service agents had reduced context on calls, engineering staff had to manage multiple vendor and customer solutions separately, and customers experienced authentication failures that decreased conversion rates

After the investment, interviewees shared that they often realized the greatest value from using multiple Twilio products together. By combining Twilio products such as Messaging, Email, and Voice with customer data from Segment CDP, their organizations were able to create more seamless and personalized customer journeys, improving customer experience and staff productivity.

Although their organizations used a wide range of Twilio products, the interviewees shared particular benefits related to the following Twilio use cases:

  • Messaging. APIs for sending and receiving RCS, SMS, MMS, WhatsApp, and chat messages with built-in carrier compliance, programmable triggers, delivery routing, and two-way conversational commerce.

  • Voice. Programmable APIs with features including intelligent routing, click-to-call, recording, real-time transcription, personalized outreach, and branded calling.

  • Email. Programmable APIs for high-volume email; tools for dynamic templates to personalize content; real-time address validation; and testing for rendering, spam filter triggers, broken links, and load time issues.

  • Verify. A multichannel verification API that delivers OTPs via SMS, voice, email, and WhatsApp, while simultaneously detecting and preventing fraud.

  • Segment CDP. A customer data platform that collects real-time first-party data from every touchpoint and unifies it into a single database and consolidated customer profile to improve communications.

  • Flex. A programmable cloud contact center that gives agents a unified interface to handle voice, SMS, WhatsApp, and email interactions with customer context pulled from Segment CDP.

Implementing Twilio’s products enabled the interviewees’ organizations to consolidate onto a single platform where every channel connects through a shared data layer, driving the following benefits:

  • Overall conversion rate improved through more personalized, omnichannel engagement.

  • Authentication success rate improved from recovering thousands of previously lost conversions.

  • Customer care and sales agents became more efficient, with real-time context surfaced directly in Twilio Flex.

  • Communications uptime improved, reducing unplanned downtime costs.

  • Compliance and fraud teams saved significant time through automated detection and built-in regulatory controls.

  • Organizations retired legacy vendor contracts, eliminating redundant SMS gateways, OTP providers, and inflexible contact center licenses.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • A 10% increase in conversion rate from personalized engagement with Twilio Messaging, Voice, and Segment CDP. Twilio Messaging enables the composite organization to personalize customer outreach and implement behavioral triggers, such as timely cart abandonment messages and promotional alerts based on browsing behavior. Additionally, the composite uses Twilio Voice to ensure that when a customer does call in, intelligent routing and real-time data integration deliver them to the right agent with full context, enabling more effective selling. With Twilio’s Messaging and Voice APIs, the composite boosts conversion rates by 10%, leading to a risk-adjusted $8.4 million in profits over three years.

  • An improvement in authentication success rate, from 91% to 95%. The composite organization leverages Twilio Verify to improve OTP deliverability, recovering users who previously abandoned purchases due to failed OTP delivery. Since every failed authentication poses a risk of a lost conversion, this improvement directly translates to recovered revenue for the composite: Over the course of the three-year analysis, the improved authentication success rate is worth a risk-adjusted $2.0 million.

  • A 15% productivity lift for sales and customer success from unified customer context, automation, and routing across Twilio Flex, Messaging, Voice, and Segment CDP. The composite uses Twilio Flex to give sales and customer service agents a single screen with real-time customer context pulled from customer relationship management tools and Segment CDP data, eliminating the scramble to identify who is calling and why. Meanwhile, Twilio Voice’s intelligent routing ensures that the composite’s customers reach the right agent, reducing transfers and repeat calls. Collectively, these efficiency gains are worth a risk-adjusted $4.7 million in employee labor costs over three years.

  • A 60% reduction in unplanned communications downtime costs. The composite organization uses Twilio’s cloud infrastructure to replace its downtime-prone, single-point-of-failure legacy systems, boosting system reliability. Twilio’s Super Network routes the composite’s traffic around carrier outages in real time, reducing the organization’s annual unplanned downtime to single-digit hours and leading to $477,000 in protected profits over the three-year analysis.

  • Time savings on managing fraud and compliance tasks. Instead of investigating fraud reactively, the composite organization uses Twilio Verify’s built-in Fraud Guard to automatically detect and block SMS attacks. Additionally, Twilio provides centralized audit logs for every customer interaction, which simplifies regulatory reviews, enhances support for carrier registration requirements, and reduces the manual time required for compliance and documentation. Over three years, these internal time savings are worth a risk-adjusted $133,000 to the composite.

  • Cost savings from retiring legacy tools and simplifying platform management. After consolidating onto Twilio, the composite organization retires legacy SMS aggregators, OTP providers, contact center solutions, email platforms, and some of its legacy telephony hardware. Beyond the direct cost savings, retiring these tools eliminates the ongoing engineering burden of maintaining point-to-point integrations between these systems, freeing development resources to focus on building better customer-facing experiences. Between the direct cost savings and employee time savings, platform consolidation creates $3.4 million in value for the composite over three years.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Improved data hygiene and a unified customer view. Twilio helps the composite organization unify fragmented customer data across messaging, voice, authentication, and web interactions, creating a cleaner, more reliable customer profile. By reducing duplicate records and siloed engagement histories, the composite’s sales and customer support teams gain more visibility into the full customer journey.

  • Greater customizability than out-of-the-box solutions. Twilio’s API infrastructure allows the composite to design customer experiences that better match its business logic and standards. Teams can build tailored workflows for contact center routing and notifications instead of adapting their processes to fit software constraints.

  • Early value from embedded AI capabilities. The composite organization leverages various Twilio AI capabilities, such as conversational intelligence and predictive call routing, to further improve staff productivity and customer experience. Because Twilio is LLM-agnostic, the composite organization integrates with the language model of its choice instead of being locked into a single provider, allowing it to adjust its preferred model as it goes.

  • Enhanced customer trust and retention with reliability and branded calling. With Twilio, the composite organization reaches out to customers with branded phone calls, improving response rates and customer trust. It further improves this trust via the reliability of Twilio’s communications workflows, leading to customer retention.

  • Additional value from using multiple Twilio use cases together. The composite uses Twilio Voice, Messaging, Segment CDP, Email, Verify, and Flex together, allowing it to unlock benefits that exceed the sum of each standalone product. Shared customer data across channels allow for more personalized communications at every touchpoint, resulting in a more connected customer journey and compounding efficiencies.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Twilio usage costs. The composite organization incurs usage-based costs for Twilio Voice, Messaging, Segment CDP, Verify, and Flex. Over three years, these costs amount to a risk-adjusted $5.2 million.

  • Internal labor for Twilio implementation. The composite organization implements the Twilio solutions over six months. During the implementation process, the composite’s sales and customer success staff receive training to engage with customers using Twilio. Over the course of the three-year analysis, these internal labor costs amount to $397,000.

  • Labor for ongoing Twilio management. After implementing Twilio, the composite organization dedicates two FTEs to managing the APIs, deploying new features, or assisting with employee training. Over three years, this amounts to $979,000 in employee labor costs.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $19.1 million over three years versus costs of $6.6 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $12.5 million and an ROI of 190%.

Improvement in conversion rates for customer sessions impacted with Twilio Messaging or Voice

10%

Reduction in unplanned downtime with Twilio

60%

Improvement in sales or customer success team productivity with Twilio

15%

“We have [Twilio’s] Fast Track for A2P, which is the single greatest investment I have ever made in anything. Anyone who is doing A2P should have that turned on and should be doing it without any question in their mind whatsoever.”

Chief growth officer, medical records

“Twilio is reliable, scalable, and it’s very customizable. There’s really not much else like it.”

CIO, retail

Key Statistics

190%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$19.1M

Benefits PV 

$12.5M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Profit increase from improved conversion rates Profit increase from improved authentication success rate Sales and customer success agent time savings Improved availability with Twilio Compliance and fraud time savings Cost savings from consolidating onto Twilio

The Twilio Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Twilio investment
Interviews
Role Industry Region Annual revenue
CIO Retail US $2 billion
Chief growth officer Medical records US $20 million
Director of product management
Engineering director
Financial services US <$5 billion
Director of IT Healthcare North America <$1 billion
Key Challenges

Interviewees reported that before Twilio, they used a combination of legacy systems, point solutions, and carrier-managed tools to power messaging, voice, authentication, and customer engagement. These systems often operated in silos, with limited data sharing and rigid workflows that required manual intervention or IT-heavy change cycles. As a result, the interviewees’ organizations struggled with limited visibility into cross-channel journeys and inconsistent customer experiences that resulted in lost conversions.

This fragmented approach frequently prevented these organizations from customizing customer journeys to match organizational objectives. Because out-of-the-box platforms prioritize standardized workflows over flexibility, interviewees’ organizations had to adapt their business processes to the software. Custom logic, tailored authentication flows, and personalized, triggered messaging journeys were complex or infeasible. New integrations were engineering-intensive, costly, and required extensive delivery timelines.

Interviewees described how their need for custom development drove their adoption of Twilio:

  • The chief growth officer at a medical records organization described Twilio’s developer-first approach: “With Twilio, we found that no matter if it is Voice, Video, or Verify, we can do customizations that make our implementation [of new features] so much faster. We can set things up in days whereas it would take us months with another vendor to go through all their hoops. We love the fact that developers are part of Twilio’s core DNA.”

  • The CIO at a retailer agreed, stating that Twilio’s customizability was essential to their goal of personalized customer communications: “Our phone system is not one size fits all. It’s hyper personalized for every single sales associate. We have over 700 sales agents and we have a unique phone system for each one; they have their own custom voice recordings, hold music, and workflows. That was all very difficult with our old system.”

  • The CIO went on to say that, “Being able to isolate and create specific custom workflows within agent routing based off internal data was a huge advantage for us in terms of delivering highly personalized experiences to someone on the phone.”

  • The director of product management at a financial services organization described how the rigidity of a previous contact center as a service (CCaaS) solution — as well as comparable tools on the market — encouraged them to pursue a more developer-led journey with Twilio: “With our previous CCaaS solutions, it always felt like we had to go all-in on one platform and use them for all of our communications channels. More importantly, we had to heavily invest in getting data into the platform for them to be useful. … When evaluating other solutions, we estimated that we would need three or four quarters of work just to build integrations with the platforms and to ship them client or team member data. The start-up cost was millions of dollars. With Twilio, we could use their awesome documentation to get started in a self-service way and launch a proof of concept in a matter of weeks or a month. The cost to experiment was significantly lower.”

Investment Objectives

The interviewees searched for a solution that could:

  • Enable developer-first customization with flexible, API-driven infrastructure.

  • Streamline the authentication process while defending against fraud.

  • Deliver more personalized cross-channel communications.

  • Drive agent time savings and efficiency.

  • Activate real-time customer insights Segment CDP to improve targeting and journey orchestration.

  • Increase reliability and business continuity across critical engagement channels.

“We found that products at Twilio are so much easier for us to implement. The developer-first process is so much easier for us because we have a big development team.”

Chief growth officer, medical records

“The start-up cost [of other solutions] was millions of dollars. With Twilio, we could use their awesome documentation to get started in a self-service way and launch a proof of concept in a matter of weeks or a month. The cost to experiment was significantly lower.”

Director of product management, financial services

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is headquartered in the US and operates globally. The enterprise has $1 billion in annual revenue, more than 1 million customers, and 3,000 employees. Customer outreach and support is handled by a team of 400 agents. The composite’s average order value (AOV) is $250.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using the solution in Year 1, following a six-month implementation period. The composite implements a range of features from Twilio, including Messaging, Voice, Segment CDP, Verify, and Flex for its contact center and sales agents.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $1 billion in annual revenue

  • 3,000 employees

  • $250 AOV

  • Using Twilio Messaging, Voice, Segment CDP, Verify, and Flex

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Profit increase from improved conversion rates $3,375,000 $3,375,000 $3,375,000 $10,125,000 $8,393,125
Btr Profit increase from improved authentication success rate $810,000 $810,000 $810,000 $2,430,000 $2,014,350
Ctr Sales and customer success agent time savings $1,886,976 $1,886,976 $1,886,976 $5,660,928 $4,692,630
Dtr Improved availability with Twilio $192,000 $192,000 $192,000 $576,000 $477,476
Etr Compliance and fraud time savings $53,663 $53,663 $53,663 $160,988 $133,451
Ftr Cost savings from consolidating onto Twilio $1,364,400 $1,364,400 $1,364,400 $4,093,200 $3,393,061
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $7,682,038 $7,682,038 $7,682,038 $23,046,115 $19,104,093
Profit Increase From Improved Conversion Rates

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that Twilio Messaging, Voice, and Segment CDP helped improve conversion rates by enabling their organizations to deliver more timely and personalized customer interactions via phone calls or SMS, MMS, and WhatsApp messages. They also shared that Segment CDP unified their customer data across touchpoints, providing them with more visibility into user behavior and preferences and allowing them to trigger targeted communications at key moments in the customer journey. Interviewees described the benefits of easier two-way communication with Twilio:

  • The CIO at a retailer reported that their sales team was able to overhaul its calling process with Twilio, making it easier for sales agents to reach customers at every step of the journey. The interviewee reported a significant increase in sales and partially attributed it to Twilio improving their call success rate: “Last year, our phone sales increased by about $150 million. … On our old phone system, we had about a 7% call delivery rejection rate, and we now have got that down to about 2%. The Twilio Super Network got us about a 5% lift in the number of calls that actually reach end customers.”

  • The same interviewee described how the improvement in reliability with Twilio Voice led to higher customer engagement and retention: “We have fantastic customer retention stats, and Twilio’s part of the puzzle. We get great feedback on call quality from customers and that is super important to us. When we were using [our previous provider] for dial paths, that was a constant fight. Since we’ve been on Twilio, that has become a nonfactor.”

  • The director of product management at a financial services organization reported that their organization used Twilio to build a CEP, where their agents could have a central portal to reach out to customers and track their purchase journeys. The interviewee stated: “With 10-digit texts going out through Twilio, we made it much more efficient for our team members to send more texts to our clients, follow up with them more, and create higher engagement. Ultimately, that led to more clients moving forward, increasing conversion rates and closed loan volume. … This delivered over $1 billion in additional gross loan value.”

  • The director of product management at the financial services firm also reported an improvement in response rates: “When we deployed Twilio and [the engagement platform we built with it], we saw a 37% lift in client text message response rates. We found that the increase in response rates led to more clients closing with us and better conversion rates.”

  • The same interviewee summarized the value of the Twilio platform on customer communication: “Twilio has allowed us to leverage existing data to enable our team members to communicate with clients in exactly the way we want them to communicate with clients. It has allowed us to keep up in terms of the evolution of AI and how it influences communications and workflows.”

  • The director of IT in the healthcare space noted that Twilio helped them reduce the number of missed appointments from patients, protecting them from the revenue and productivity losses associated with no-shows: “We built in automated follow-up workflows with Twilio. Because of the programmable SMS and voice APIs, there are reminders that patients get at certain time intervals. They get automatic confirmations without someone from our team having to reach out. … The two-way engagement has helped us go from a 55% to 60% appointment confirmation rate to about a 75% to 80% confirmation rate.”

  • The same interviewee added: “Because patients can quickly confirm [with staff] if they are coming in for an appointment or need to reschedule, they don’t have to pick up their phone; it’s simply done through a text message and a two-way campaign. Then we can quickly backfill that provider’s time. … We’re also seeing an eight- to 10-point improvement in customer satisfaction because of these Twilio capabilities.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization has 50 million customer sessions each year that are impacted by Twilio Messaging or Voice interactions.

  • The organization’s baseline conversion rate on comparable sessions is 3.0%.

  • With Twilio, the composite increases conversion rates by 10%, or 0.3 percentage points.

  • The composite organization has an AOV of $250.

  • The composite has an operating margin of 10%.

Risks. The profit gain from an improvement in conversion rates will vary depending on:

  • The share of sales impacted by Twilio Messaging or Voice workflows.

  • An organization’s baseline conversion rate.

  • An organization’s AOV.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $8.4 million.

10%

Improvement in conversion rates for customer sessions impacted by Twilio Messaging or Voice

“We saw a 30-basis point increase in conversion rates from combining push notifications, SMS, and Voice calls in a targeted journey with Twilio. … I think what Twilio allows us to do is actually execute in a really consistent way.”

CIO, retail

Profit Increase From Improved Conversion Rates
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Customer sessions impacted by Twilio Messaging or Voice interactions Composite 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000
A2 Baseline conversion rate Interviews 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
A3 Improvement in conversion rate with Twilio Interviews 10% 10% 10%
A4 Conversion rate with Twilio A2*(1+A3) 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%
A5 Incremental orders with Twilio (A1*A4)-(A1*A2) 150,000 150,000 150,000
A6 AOV Composite $250 $250 $250
A7 Operating margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
At Profit increase from improved conversion rates A5*A6*A7 $3,750,000 $3,750,000 $3,750,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Atr Profit increase from improved conversion rates (risk-adjusted)   $3,375,000 $3,375,000 $3,375,000
Three-year total: $10,125,000 Three-year present value: $8,393,125
Profit Increase From Improved Authentication Success Rate

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that Twilio Verify improves authentication success rates by optimizing verification delivery and completion across channels and geographies. The interviewees described how this improvement impacted their organizations:

  • The chief growth officer at a medical records company noted how Verify helped their organization seamlessly authenticate users while maintaining its adherence to key compliance frameworks: “With HIPAA, we are required to have an multifactor authentication of some sort on our system. … We force clients to use Verify to get into our system every day. … Verify changed the game for us. It’s all automated and managed by Twilio. From an authentication standpoint, it’s much more reliable, and we can scale it to anything.”

  • The same interviewee went on to say that Twilio Verify enabled them to streamline verifications while simultaneously protecting against fraud: “Verify not only authenticates for us, but it also verifies the phone number and makes sure it’s a real person that’s booking the appointment. We used to fight that battle all the time, where a competitor would take up all the appointments in the schedule. With Verify, we know that it’s a real person and a real phone number. It’s not a bot.”

  • The director of IT at a healthcare organization agreed that Verify had significantly boosted their authentication success rate, noting that Twilio’s global carrier relationships and automatic channel fallback ensured users could successfully login: “From an authentication perspective, Twilio has a more reliable delivery methodology, so one-time passwords and SMS or Voice [authentications] actually get to whoever needs them. … Because of Twilio, we’ve made the delivery, the login experience, and the customer experience more consistent across all of the channels.”

  • The director of IT went on to report that, “Previously, our authentication success rate was in the high 80s, and now it’s almost 96%.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization experiences 6 million authentication attempts each year.

  • Before implementing Twilio Verify, the organization’s authentication success rate was 91%. After implementing Twilio Verify, this rises to 95%.

  • Fifteen percent of the failed authentications result in abandoned purchases for the composite organization.

  • The composite organization has an AOV of $250.

  • The composite has an operating margin of 10%.

Risks. The profit increase from improved authentication success will vary depending on the following factors:

  • The number of authentication attempts an organization experiences.

  • An organization’s baseline authentication success rate.

  • The share of failed authentications that result in abandoned purchases.

  • An organization’s AOV.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.0 million.

4.0 percentage points

Increase in authentication success rate

“[With Verify], we’re doing millions of verifications, and it’s at least a 98% success rate with authentication on the first try. … Verify is extraordinarily reliable. The text always comes through, and they always get their code.”

Chief growth officer, medical records

Profit Increase From Improved Authentication Success Rate
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Annual authentication attempts Composite 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000
B2 Baseline authentication success rate Composite 91% 91% 91%
B3 Improvement in authentication success rate with Twilio (percentage points) Interviews 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
B4 Authentication success rate with Twilio B2+B3 95% 95% 95%
B5 Incremental successful sessions B1*B3 240,000 240,000 240,000
B6 Share of failed authentications that lead to abandoned purchases Composite 15% 15% 15%
B7 AOV Composite $250 $250 $250
B8 Operating margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
Bt Profit increase from improved authentication success rate B5*B6*B7*B8 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Btr Profit increase from improved authentication success rate (risk-adjusted)   $810,000 $810,000 $810,000
Three-year total: $2,430,000 Three-year present value: $2,014,350
Sales And Customer Success Agent Time Savings

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported substantial time savings for their sales and customer success teams after consolidating onto Twilio Flex’s single unified interface. Before Twilio, some interviewees reported that agents were switching between different interfaces to pull up customer context, but Flex consolidated a customer’s profile into a single screen, enabling agents to work more efficiently with them. Interviewees described a number of productivity-boosting use cases:

  • Interviewees praised Twilio’s routing engine, which uses real-time customer data and interaction history to direct inquiries to the best-fit agent, reducing transfers and hold time. The CIO at a retailer stated: “[With Twilio], we are dynamically looking at where the customer is in the journey, and how we can direct them to someone with the least hold time. We were able to take our average hold time from about 5 minutes per caller down to sub-60 seconds.”

  • The same interviewee added, “On the service support side, we’ve been able to scale our organization while holding headcount flat.”

  • Interviewees reported that using Twilio allowed them to route calls more efficiently and its API-based approach reduced the time spent resolving data errors within the sales platform. The director of IT at a healthcare company stated: “Our customer service reps and sales engineers are saving time on call messaging and routing. Twilio’s Voice program and SMS have helped reduce triage time. The second bucket of time savings is data enrichment, data management, and eliminating a lot of duplicative data entries within the CRM. ... And then from a workflow and API perspective, we have less errors. On average, we’re saving 6 to 8 hours per agent per week.”

  • Interviewees shared that Twilio’s programmable triggers automated routine tasks like appointment reminders, follow-up sequences, and updates, freeing agents to focus on higher-value conversations versus manual outreach. The chief growth officer at a medical records company described how automation impacted their team: “Our customer service team can automate so many things now. We use SMS to do tons of client-facing automations. With a little bit of AI help, we can use Twilio to do calls, even branded calls, which are answered much more frequently. … This is [from] being able to use the Twilio infrastructure to do task automation.”

  • Interviewees also said that Segment CDP’s unified customer profiles and behavioral triggers helped their sales teams surface real-time buying signals, allowing them to prioritize their time on accounts likely to convert. The director of product management at a financial services company described Twilio as the backbone of a CEP that streamlined the sales process: “We built an application on top of Twilio to help our salespeople work their pipelines in a more streamlined way. … Our 3,000 sales agents saved 15% of their time on reaching out to their sales pipeline and managing their book of business.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization has 400 sales and customer success agents.

  • In a given day, these employees dedicate 60% of their time to interacting with customers.

  • Using Twilio Flex and Twilio’s Voice and Messaging APIs, the sales and customer success agents are 15% more efficient in managing customer interactions.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for these employees is $28.

Risks. Sales and customer success agent time savings will vary depending on:

  • The number of agents.

  • The share of time they spend interacting directly with customers.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for sales and customer success agents.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.7 million.

15%

Improvement in sales and customer success agent productivity with Twilio

“Any client-facing role, mainly sales support and client success, is probably saving 2 to 3 hours each day with automations [built with Twilio].”

Chief growth officer, medical records

Sales And Customer Success Agent Time Savings
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Sales and customer success agents Composite 400 400 400
C2 Share of time spent directly interacting with customers Composite 60% 60% 60%
C3 Improvement in productivity with Twilio Interviews 15% 15% 15%
C4 Sales and customer success agent time savings (hours) C1*C2*C3*2,080 hours per year 74,880 74,880 74,880
C5 Fully burdened hourly rate for a sales or customer success agent Composite $28 $28 $28
Ct Sales and customer success agent time savings C4*C5 $2,096,640 $2,096,640 $2,096,640
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ctr Sales and customer success agent time savings (risk-adjusted)   $1,886,976 $1,886,976 $1,886,976
Three-year total: $5,660,928 Three-year present value: $4,692,630
Improved Availability With Twilio

Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that migrating to Twilio’s cloud infrastructure reduced unplanned communications downtime. Twilio’s Super Network routes traffic around carrier outages with built-in failover capabilities, reducing the revenue losses associated with outages. Interviewees detailed the improvement in reliability:

  • The director of IT at a healthcare organization described how legacy system outages led to communications outages, but that Twilio had significantly improved their uptime: “We were previously using a custom-made middleware solution, but it didn’t have the right infrastructure and failover capabilities. Now our failover is in the 99.9 percentile range, and message reliability rate is also above 99%. … We also see a 40% reduction in API latency, which has been a significant win.”

  • The same interviewee went on to estimate the business impact of the reliability improvement: “With our legacy system, we had anywhere from 6 to 9 hours of downtime per year, whereas with Twilio, it’s been between 1 and 2 hours per year. One hour of downtime generally costs between $300,000 and $350,000 because of all the appointments [that could be impacted].”

  • The chief growth officer at a medical records organization agreed that Twilio had improved their uptime and detailed the impact of any outages: “If there is ever a day that we cannot get a text out to remind a patient, that is money lost. … Now, unless there is a broader cloud attack, we have no disruption with our messaging at all, or voice.”

  • The same interviewee added: “Twilio is extraordinarily dependable and prevents any issues. Uptime-wise, we have not had to go offline with messaging in years.”

  • The engineering director at a financial services firm added that although their legacy system was fairly stable, uptime had improved with Twilio, and its support team made the response process even smoother. The interviewee stated: “We also have seen a slight uptick in performance and stability, and I give very heavy props to Twilio on their support and response times. If we do have an issue, they’re actually working with us in [our instant messaging solution]. The response time is fantastic, and they jump on calls with us very quickly to get ahead of things.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Before implementing Twilio, the composite organization has 20 hours of unplanned downtime annually that impacts their messaging or voice interactions.

  • With Twilio, the composite reduces this unplanned downtime by 60%.

  • Each hour of downtime costs the composite organization $200,000 in lost revenue.

  • The composite organization has an operating margin of 10%.

Risks. The scale of the benefit will vary depending on the following factors:

  • The amount of unplanned downtime in the legacy environment.

  • The hourly revenue loss associated with an hour of downtime.

  • Whether an organization incurs additional costs from downtime, such as fines or regulatory penalties.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $477,000.

60%

Reduction in unplanned downtime with Twilio

“Our legacy system was going down constantly. We were struggling to hit low 90s, and sometimes it would even be high 80s on uptime with that system. With Twilio, we’re in the high, high 90s. Well above what we want for SLAs.”

CIO, retail

“We would get nothing done if we had to worry about Twilio working; it would be impossible for us to run a business. Because it does work, I do not have to worry about it, and I can focus on other things that might be an issue for us.”

Chief growth officer, medical records

Improved Availability With Twilio
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Unplanned communications downtime before Twilio (hours) Composite 20 20 20
D2 Downtime reduction with Twilio Interviews 60% 60% 60%
D3 Downtime eliminated with Twilio (hours) D1*D2 12 12 12
D4 Revenue loss per hour of downtime Composite $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
D5 Gross revenue protected D3*D4 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,400,000
D6 Operating margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
Dt Improved availability with Twilio D5*D6 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Dtr Improved availability with Twilio (risk-adjusted)   $192,000 $192,000 $192,000
Three-year total: $576,000 Three-year present value: $477,476
Compliance And Fraud Time Savings

Evidence and data. Interviewees stated that Twilio consolidated their communications logs with a single set of APIs, making manual data collection for regulatory frameworks easier. Additionally, interviewees said that Twilio Verify reduced fraud in their organizations, saving staff time on incident investigation and response. Interviewees described a number of time-saving opportunities from Twilio:

  • Interviewees shared that Verify improved user authentication, helping fraud teams prevent account takeovers while minimizing manual identity checks. The chief growth officer at a medical records company described the developer effort required for previous instances of fraud: “[Previously], we spent so much time on people who could not protect their accounts on their own. We were spending probably $100,000 a year just on developer costs to keep implementing new checks and balances and turning up all of our fraud limiters. Now, we’re just turning on Verify.”

  • In addition to time savings related to fraud, the same interviewee described efficiencies related to preparing for compliance tasks: “Without Twilio, we wouldn’t be able to function as a HIPAA-compliant system. We do a two-way inbox that’s protected within the system so we can send out HIPAA-compliant text messaging. … Between verified blocking entry and our SMS process now being so buttoned up with Twilio, we don’t have to dedicate any one person to being a compliance officer. Previously, a DevOps employee was spending 30 hours a week on fraud and compliance.”

  • The director of IT at a healthcare firm agreed that Twilio provided time savings worth half an FTE on compliance-related tasks, noting, “We’re saving about half of the time that was spent on getting data that we would need in terms of audit trails.”

  • Interviewees also reported that Twilio’s PCI-compliant payment capabilities helped them securely process and transmit payment information, reducing compliance workload and audit preparation time. The CIO at a retailer described the value: “We got our phone system out of PCI scope through their PCI payment product, Twilio Pay. There’s a lot of toil that we eliminated within the team. … Not having to deal with auditors was a nice win for sure.”

  • The chief growth officer at the medical records company also praised Twilio’s Fast Track for A2P offering, noting that it simplified A2P 10DLC registration and carrier compliance: “We have the Fast Track for A2P, which is the single greatest investment I have ever made in anything. Anyone who is doing A2P should have that turned on and should be doing it without any question in their mind whatsoever.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization has 10 employees supporting authentication, fraud monitoring, and compliance workflows.

  • On average, these employees dedicate 15% of their time to these manual tasks.

  • With Twilio, employees reduce the amount of time spent on manual compliance and fraud tasks by 50%.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for compliance and fraud analysts is $106,000.

  • A productivity recapture of 75% is applied since not all time savings are redeployed productively.

Risks. The compliance and fraud time savings will vary depending on:

  • The amount of FTE effort dedicated to fraud and compliance-related tasks.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for compliance and fraud analysts.

  • The specific compliance frameworks that an organization must meet.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $133,000.

50%

Time savings on communications fraud and compliance monitoring

“From a fraud perspective, being able to verify things at every step has been a huge benefit for us. At this point, we couldn’t operate one day without Verify working.”

Chief growth officer, medical records

“Twilio Pay allows the existing team to focus on delivering features back to the business that make us operate better instead of dealing with compliance-related tasks.”

CIO, retail

Compliance And Fraud Time Savings
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Employees supporting authentication, fraud monitoring, and compliance workflows Composite 10 10 10
E2 Share of time spent on manual identity verification, authentication escalations, and compliance reviews Composite 15% 15% 15%
E3 Time savings on communications-related compliance and fraud tasks with Twilio Interviews 50% 50% 50%
E4 Fully burdened annual salary for fraud analysts TEI standard $106,000 $106,000 $106,000
E5 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 75% 75% 75%
Et Compliance and fraud time savings E1*E2*E3*E4*E5 $59,625 $59,625 $59,625
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Etr Compliance and fraud time savings (risk-adjusted)   $53,663 $53,663 $53,663
Three-year total: $160,988 Three-year present value: $133,451
Cost Savings From Consolidating Onto Twilio

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that implementing Twilio allowed them to retire a variety of legacy point solutions previously used for customer engagement. Additionally, interviewees shared that because they moved from multiple communications tools to just one, their internal teams saved time on tool management. The interviewees described the cost savings:

  • The director of IT at a healthcare organization reported a range of products being retired: “Our previous middleware solution was eliminated, which saved us half a million dollars annually. We also had an SMS gateway service that was between $80,000 and $100,000 per year. On top of that, we have between $150,000 and $200,000 in infrastructure cost savings, so I would say it could be up to $850,000 a year in total cost savings.”

  • The chief growth officer at a medical records organization reported that they retired legacy email while also reducing their development costs: “We have eliminated our external email provider, and we can do all of our texting within our own platform with Twilio. We also saved a ton of money in development costs because we can do it all ourselves with Twilio and do not have to work with external groups.”

  • The same interviewee added: “Video is so inexpensive with Twilio. It’s crazy how cheap it is. … I’m saving $80,000 a year compared to [previous video provider].”

  • The CIO at a retail organization agreed that the ease of developing on Twilio led to substantial cost savings: “We felt like we were spending about $600,000 a year just maintaining the old system. … Previously, we had six people on our team running the phone system team. That’s now down to three, and frankly, it’s three because we want to have a little bit of redundancy. That team also spends most of its time now innovating within the platform and delivering business solutions instead of configuring users and figuring out where we made mistakes. Our user provisioning is completely automated at this point.”

  • The CIO also praised Twilio’s pricing model relative to their legacy solution: “[Our legacy system] was lumpy and unpredictable, and there was a lot of capex underneath that from the phone standpoint. … I think the predictability of Twilio’s cost was something that we were very excited about. We can measure it and model it.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization uses a variety of products from Twilio — including Messaging, Voice, Verify, Segment CDP, Email, and Flex — and retires legacy CCaaS platforms, standalone SMS gateway services, email providers, and other fragmented communications infrastructure. Collectively, these costs amount to $800,000 per year.

  • Previously, the composite organization had four FTEs dedicated to managing its legacy suite of communications tools. With Twilio, it requires only two FTEs for equivalent tasks. The two Twilio management FTEs are included in the cost section of the TEI model.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for platform managers is $179,000.

Risks. The cost savings from consolidating onto Twilio will vary depending on:

  • The specific tools an organization is able to retire with Twilio.

  • The speed at which an organization is able to replace legacy products with Twilio capabilities.

  • The number of employees dedicated to managing the legacy set of tools.

  • The fully burdened annual salaries for platform managers.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.4 million.

4 FTEs down to 2 FTEs

Time savings on platform management

“The benefit with [managing Twilio] is that everything is centralized, so that is a huge win. Incident times have also come down. The configuration, the UI, and the speed of Twilio’s APIs allow for quick deployment, testing, validation, and tweaking.”

Director of IT, healthcare

Cost Savings From Consolidating Onto Twilio
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Cost savings from retiring legacy systems and hardware Interviews $800,000 $800,000 $800,000
F2 Internal FTEs dedicated to managing legacy platforms Interviews 4 4 4
F3 Fully burdened annual salary for platform managers Composite $179,000 $179,000 $179,000
Ft Cost savings from consolidating onto Twilio F1+(F2*F3) $1,516,000 $1,516,000 $1,516,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ftr Cost savings from consolidating onto Twilio (risk-adjusted)   $1,364,400 $1,364,400 $1,364,400
Three-year total: $4,093,200 Three-year present value: $3,393,061
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Improved data hygiene and a unified customer view. Interviewees noted that Twilio helped their organizations centralize customer communications and identity across different channels, making it easier to track interactions and maintain accurate contact information. With tools like Twilio Segment CDP and programmable messaging and voice APIs, the interviewees’ teams could standardize how they captured communications events, reduce duplicate contacts, and maintain a more consistent view of each customer. The CIO at a retailer noted, “We’ve definitely seen big improvements in data hygiene, from Twilio’s ability to use Lookup and some of the SendGrid [email] tools and to be able to make sure the agents are capturing numbers correctly and caller ID correctly.”
    The same interviewee went on to say that: “Previously, we really struggled with tracking every single call and how it progressed through our building. … We have definitely executed on that data more [with Twilio] by feeding it back into our marketing engine. That is visibility that we did not have previously.”
    The director of IT at the healthcare organization noted that their team used data from Twilio to build a real-time reporting dashboard on metrics such as SMS delivery rates, phone call follow-up rates, and error resolution rates. The interviewee noted that Twilio enabled their team to build and access these reports more quickly: “Previously, we had a custom report that took two people spending 8 hours a week to maintain, and this was brought down significantly because of the reporting dashboard that we have with Twilio. … People also spend less time chasing down reports and everyone gets that information a little bit faster.”

  • Greater customization with Twilio. Interviewees praised Twilio’s customizable, developer-first platform, noting that it allowed their organizations to design communications workflows that precisely matched their customer journeys rather than being constrained by less flexible out-of-the-box software. Through programmable APIs across Messaging, Voice, Authentication, and Segment CDP, their teams could iterate on features and integrate communications directly into customer-facing applications. The director of product management at a financial services company noted, “Because Twilio lets us build our own UI on top of theirs, it’s an exponential difference between what we’ve been able to build and how we’ve been able to evolve compared to what we would get from an out-of-the-box CCaaS solution.”
    The chief growth officer at a medical records company agreed on the merits of the developer-first approach, adding that: “Whenever we are given a chance to plug something else in, it is already there and ready to go. We just use Twilio. I would say in a given month, we probably save $4,000 in what would be external fees for using various systems to do what we do.”

  • Early value from deploying Twilio’s AI capabilities. Some interviewees reported that they had experimented with some of Twilio’s AI capabilities, such as conversational AI and AI-assisted routing. Long term, their organizations aim to use these capabilities to automate routine workflows, improve response times, and support human agents with real-time insights. The CIO at a retail company noted that Twilio’s AI features are designed to be LLM-agnostic, allowing their organization to integrate the models they choose into their Messaging and Voice workflows. The interviewee stated: “We have deployed conversational AI with Twilio. I think it works really well. I love that they allow us to bring different models along with us. I think their stance on being agnostic to the LLM is definitely one that resonates with us, especially as that space changes on a daily basis.”

  • Enhanced customer trust with Twilio’s branded calling features. Interviewees shared that Twilio branded calling helped their organizations display their verified business name and logo on outbound calls, increasing answer rates and customer trust while reducing the likelihood of legitimate calls being mistaken for spam. The chief growth officer at the medical records organization reported: “We use Twilio to do branded calling, so calls are answered much more frequently. We don’t have to spend so much time calling now.”
    The same interviewee went on to describe how features such as branded calling drove improved customer trust: “Texting is working, and phones are working, and videos are working, so no news is good news. That is how we gauge trust and retention. … Twilio just works, so trust-wise, I do not have to worry about any issues.”

  • Additional value from using multiple Twilio use cases together. Interviewees reported realizing the greatest value from Twilio when they used multiple products together. By combining channels like Messaging, SendGrid, and Voice with customer data from Segment CDP, their organizations were able to create more seamless and personalized customer journeys, improving employee productivity and customer experience. The director of IT at a healthcare company described the “better together” story of using Segment CDP alongside Messaging and Voice: “With Segment CDP, we can classify and connect all of our data. We previously had four fairly disjointed systems that we are now able to bring under one roof. Because of how things are connected, one big thing that we have seen is real-time event streaming, where we can see how a campaign is doing and we can make changes on the fly. That helps us figure out how to get more engagement.”
    The CIO at a retailer also described synergies from combining multiple Twilio use cases: “Because of the way Twilio’s platform works, you get a lot of control over how different products integrate. With a lot of the competitors, there are predefined integration points, where with Twilio, you can really weave different products together to create a custom journey.”

“If you can connect and integrate Messaging, Voice, and Segment CDP, you avoid duplicate outreach or data inconsistencies that you would have run into.”

Director of IT, healthcare

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Twilio and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Easier expansion into new markets, product categories, or service types. Interviewees shared that Twilio’s APIs and existing carrier relationships helped their organizations more easily expand and diversify their product offerings. Interviewees added that its support for multiple languages and regional communications channels allowed their organizations to localize customer experiences without having to hire translation staff. This flexibility enabled their development teams to rapidly test and deploy new offerings and scale communications as demand grew. The director of IT at a healthcare organization described the benefit: “We would have taken longer to launch a lot of our programs [without Twilio]. We’re able to reuse some of the templates, reuse some of the APIs, and scale our messaging and voice API. If we didn’t have Twilio, we probably would have needed to hire more staff for multiple language support or to help out with targeting other demographics.”
    The chief growth officer at the medical records organization noted that Twilio’s Video API allowed them to expand into telehealth, enabling them to support more patients: “With Twilio Video, we’ve been able to expand much more in the telehealth realm to do a lot more virtual visits, which is more revenue for the practice and also more patients who can be seen geographically. Video alone has been a significant driver because telehealth is where our marketplace is going.”

  • Building sellable applications with Twilio. Although most interviewees’ organizations used Twilio exclusively to communicate with their own customers, the chief growth officer at a medical records organization reported a dual use case: using Twilio to engage with its own clients and building applications with Twilio’s APIs that it resold to other clients. For example, it built Video, Messaging, and Voice-based applications that it resold to clients at highly competitive prices, and two of the applications generated more than $1 million in revenue for the organization. The interviewee stated: “All the things that Twilio launches as products, we find ways to package those up and resell them in some way that makes it sticky for the client, but also unique. … With Voice and branded calling, we have so many other things that we can offer to [our clients] at a cost that’s pretty inexpensive compared to doing it externally.”
    The interviewee went on to add, “We’re saving our clients $2,000 a month, just in fees of not having to go to external subscriptions and to use what we have already built into their system.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

“We’ve expanded into a new $100 million Segment CDP of business, and we have not hit any friction points from a customer engagement or phone system level on Twilio.”

CIO, retail

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Gtr Ongoing Twilio usage costs $0 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $6,300,000 $5,222,389
Htr Implementation and training costs $369,270 $11,088 $11,088 $11,088 $402,534 $396,844
Itr Ongoing management costs $0 $393,800 $393,800 $393,800 $1,181,400 $979,322
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $369,270 $2,504,888 $2,504,888 $2,504,888 $7,883,934 $6,598,555
Ongoing Twilio Usage Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees incurred usage-based costs for Twilio’s solutions.

  • Messaging costs are based on the number of messages sent.

  • Voice costs are based on the number of minutes of voice interactions.

  • Verify costs are based on the number of successful authentications.

  • Twilio Flex costs vary, with some customers incurring per-user pricing and some customers incurring per-hour pricing.

  • Segment CDP costs vary. Contact Twilio for additional details.

  • Some interviewees noted that professional services hours were included in their overall Twilio package.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes that the composite organization incurs usage-based costs for using Twilio Messaging, Voice, Verify, Segment CDP, and Flex. The composite uses Twilio for 35 million messages, 15 million minutes of voice interactions, 5.7 million authentications, and approximately 500,000 Flex hours.

Risks. Twilio costs will vary depending on:

  • Specific Twilio products or use cases deployed.

  • Volume of Twilio usage.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.2 million.

Ongoing Twilio Usage Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Total Twilio costs for Messaging, Authentication, Segment CDP, Voice, Flex, and Verify Composite   $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Gt Ongoing Twilio usage costs G1 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
  Risk adjustment 5%        
Gtr Ongoing Twilio usage costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000
Three-year total: $6,300,000 Three-year present value: $5,222,389
Implementation And Training Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that implementing Twilio required their developers to configure new messaging, voice, and authentication workflows; establish governance around messaging compliance and data management; and monitor integrations to ensure their reliability.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization dedicates three developers to implementing Twilio over the course of six months.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for developers is $179,000.

  • The composite also trains its 400 sales and customer success agents on using communications workflows built with Twilio.

  • Each sales and customer success employee receives 6 hours of training.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for sales and customer success employees is $28.

Risks. Implementation costs will vary depending on:

  • The specific Twilio products deployed.

  • The complexity of an organization’s legacy environment.

  • Fully burdened salaries of staff involved in implementation and training.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $397,000.

Implementation And Training Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
H1 Internal staff dedicated to implementing Twilio Composite 3      
H2 Time required for implementation and integration (months) Composite 6      
H3 Fully burdened annual salary for developers dedicated to implementation Composite $179,000      
H4 Internal labor dedicated to implementation H1*(H2/12)*H3 $268,500      
H5 Sales or customer success agents trained in using communications platform with Twilio Composite 400 60 60 60
H6 Time required for Twilio training (hours) Interviews 6 6 6 6
H7 Fully burdened hourly rate for sales or customer success agents Composite $28 $28 $28 $28
H8 Internal labor dedicated to Twilio training H5*H6*H7 $67,200 $10,080 $10,080 $10,080
Ht Implementation and training costs H4+H8 $335,700 $10,080 $10,080 $10,080
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Htr Implementation and training costs (risk-adjusted)   $369,270 $11,088 $11,088 $11,088
Three-year total: $402,534 Three-year present value: $396,844
Ongoing Management Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that ongoing management of Twilio typically included monitoring usage and costs, managing phone numbers and sender IDs, updating APIs and integrations as applications evolved, and tracking messaging or voice reliability.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite dedicates two FTEs to managing Twilio on an ongoing basis, a decrease from the four FTEs required to manage its legacy environment.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for platform managers is $179,000.

Risks. Ongoing management tasks will vary depending on:

  • The number of employees involved in Twilio workflows.

  • The fully burdened annual salary for platform managers.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $979,000.

“Twilio self-remedies its own errors. It figures out its own thing that is going wrong. But because it is set up and forget it, it is so easy to use.”

Chief growth officer, medical records

Ongoing Management Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
I1 Platform managers dedicated to ongoing management of Twilio Composite   2 2 2
I2 Fully burdened annual salary for platform managers Composite   $179,000 $179,000 $179,000
It Ongoing management costs I1*I2 $0 $358,000 $358,000 $358,000
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Itr Ongoing management costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $393,800 $393,800 $393,800
Three-year total: $1,181,400 Three-year present value: $979,322

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($369,270) ($2,504,888) ($2,504,888) ($2,504,888) ($7,883,934) ($6,598,555)
Total benefits $0 $7,682,038 $7,682,038 $7,682,038 $23,046,115 $19,104,093
Net benefits ($369,270) $5,177,150 $5,177,150 $5,177,150 $15,162,181 $12,505,538
ROI           190%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Twilio.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Twilio can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Twilio stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Twilio.

Interviews

Interviewed five decision-makers at four organizations using Twilio to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Twilio and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Twilio.

Twilio reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Twilio provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Matt Dunham

Published

April 2026

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Twilio