Executive Summary
B2B revenue organizations are facing increasingly complex buyer journeys, growing pressure to demonstrate AI- and agentic-driven productivity gains, and mounting volumes of customer engagement data. To navigate this complexity, organizations turn to revenue orchestration platforms that unify workflows, data, and decision-making across the entire revenue engine to drive predictable and scalable growth.
Outreach is an AI-powered revenue orchestration platform that can help revenue teams coordinate and execute prospecting, pipeline development, deal acceleration, customer retention, and forecasting activities. The platform combines agentic AI capabilities, conversation intelligence, workflow automation, and revenue insights to help organizations automate execution, improve visibility into customer and revenue signals, and enable sellers and revenue leaders to focus on higher-value customer interactions and decisions.
Outreach commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Outreach.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Outreach on their organizations.
Key Statistics
244%
Return on investment (ROI)
$19.2M
Benefits PV
$13.6M
Net present value (NPV)
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Outreach. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a B2B organization with $9 billion in annual revenue and 20,000 employees. There are 6,000 employees across the composite organization’s revenue organization.
Interviewees said that prior to using Outreach, their organizations relied on highly manual, representative-driven approaches to prospecting, customer engagement, deal management, and forecasting. Sales activities were often managed through a combination of email, spreadsheets, CRM tools, and disconnected processes. This left their organizations with inconsistent outreach practices, limited visibility into seller activity, inefficient reporting and analytics, and challenges scaling revenue operations. Ultimately, this led to reduced seller productivity, inconsistent customer experiences, limited manager effectiveness, and missed opportunities to maximize pipeline generation and revenue performance.
After the investment in Outreach, the interviewees’ organizations established a centralized system of action for revenue execution, forecasting, coaching, customer engagement, and revenue operations. Outreach automated key workflows, standardized best practices, improved visibility into customer interactions, and provided AI-powered insights to support sellers and managers. Interviewees also reported stronger forecast visibility, improved forecast attainment, and more scalable forecasting processes with Outreach. Key results from the investment include productivity gains across revenue teams, improved sales conversion rates and pipeline generation, increased seller capacity, and stronger coaching and customer engagement processes.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
-
Productivity lift across the revenue organization. Outreach helps the composite’s revenue organization reduce manual work and improve execution through workflow automation, conversational intelligence, AI-powered guidance, and emerging AI agents and agentic workflows. By surfacing insights and automating routine activities across sales, customer success, professional services, and revenue operations, Outreach enables teams to spend more time on revenue-generating customer engagement. This benefit amounts to a three-year labor savings of $4.2 million.
-
Profit increase from sales effectiveness. Outreach helps standardize and automate the composite’s prospecting and engagement activities, improving response rates, meeting conversion rates, sales accepted lead (SAL) creation, and deal conversions. These improvements increase pipeline generation and revenue performance, generating a three-year profit increase of $12.4 million. This benefit reflects improved conversion rates across the existing prospect base, while the sales efficiency benefit below separately captures the value of increased prospecting capacity and incremental net-new prospects generated through Outreach.
-
Profit increase from sales efficiency. By reducing administrative burden and enabling the composite’s sellers to work more efficiently, Outreach increases seller capacity and the number of prospects contacted annually. This expands pipeline creation opportunities and delivers a three-year profit increase of $2.4 million.
-
Prior tool retirement. The composite retires legacy point solutions and internally developed applications as Outreach consolidates sales engagement and revenue workflows into a single platform, generating a three-year PV of $224,000.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Creates unified system of action across the revenue organization. Outreach provides a centralized system of action for sales, customer success, professional services, and operations teams, improving visibility, coordination, and information sharing across the composite’s revenue organization.
-
Drives forecasting and revenue visibility. Outreach improves the composite’s forecast visibility, data quality, consistency, and accountability while enabling more reliable forecasting processes.
-
Improves sales coaching and best practice execution through AI-driven insights. Increased visibility into seller activity, customer interactions, and performance metrics enables more effective coaching, performance management, and accountability amongst the composite’s representatives (reps). This is driven by core capabilities including Outreach Kaia, the platform’s conversation intelligence capability.
-
Improves customer retention, renewals, and relationship quality. Outreach supports customer retention and renewal motions through more coordinated, timely, and scalable customer engagement. Ultimately, this strengthens customer interactions and relationships at the composite organization.
-
Enables communication outreach strategy. Outreach helps the composite develop, standardize, and optimize engagement strategies through structured communications, automated workflows, and performance insights.
-
Promotes brand consistency. Centralized content, templates, and messaging help ensure customer communications align with the composite’s standards and branding.
Quantified costs. Quantified costs for the composite organization include:
-
Outreach subscription fees. The composite invests in Outreach Engage, Meet, Deal, and Forecast to support prospecting, deal management, customer retention, sales coaching, and forecasting activities. Over the three-year investment period, this costs the composite $4.4 million in fees.
-
Implementation and optimization costs. The composite pays Outreach a fee of $50,000 for initial implementation. The composite is also piloting Amplify, Outreach’s AI and agentic workflow offering, which costs a one-time fee of $8,000. It also dedicates resources for implementation to set up integrations, train users, and configure workflows and governance. On an ongoing basis, the composite dedicates resources to maximize Outreach adoption and value realization. This effort, including fees and labor, costs $1.2 million in labor over three years.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $19.2 million over three years versus costs of $5.6 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $13.6 million and an ROI of 244%.
Benefits (Three-Year)
The Outreach Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the Outreach investment
Interviews
| Role | Industry | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chief customer officer | Software | $650M | 1,200 |
| Head of revenue operations | Industrial technology | $20B | 75,000 |
| Senior director of sales, processes, and applications | Telecommunications | $7.3B | 25,000 |
| Global head of GTM | Software | $43B | 110,000 |
Key Challenges
Interviewees explained that prior to Outreach, their organizations relied on highly manual and inconsistent approaches to prospecting and deal management. Sales reps often managed outreach activities independently, using personal processes, email, spreadsheets, and CRM tools with limited coordination or standardization. This created inefficiencies, increased administrative burden, and led to inconsistent customer messaging that did not always align with brand standards. Managers lacked the visibility needed to effectively monitor activity and coach sellers, while disconnected systems and manual reporting processes limited the accuracy and scalability of sales analytics and forecasting. As a result, the interviewees’ organizations struggled to execute a consistent go-to-market motion and maximize seller productivity.
Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges prior to investing in Outreach, including:
-
Manual, ad hoc outreach strategies. Interviewees explained that there was little cohesion across their sales organizations as reps operated independently and tracked performance in spreadsheets. The senior director of sales, processes, and applications at a telecom organization said: “For prospecting, teams were sending their own emails and engaging with prospects and customers on their own. Some were doing better than others. The process of people having to remember who to call and follow up on deals can be time-consuming. We missed the mark.”
The global head of GTM in software said: “In the past, workflows were very rep-dependent on manual decision-making of prospect scenarios and mapping them to certain sequences. The decision-making is now automated. We were very crude. We were doing things off spreadsheets and relied on our own CRM for outbound. It was completely archaic.” -
Taxed managers. Interviewees explained that managers were responsible for large teams of sellers, and without standardized processes and best practices, they grew overburdened. The senior director of sales, processes, and applications at a telecom organization said: “Our managers were very taxed today and cannot attend all of our seller meetings. They are being pulled in a variety of different directions.”
-
Brand inconsistency. Interviewees shared that rep-driven communications risked misrepresenting their brands to the market. The senior director of sales, processes, and applications at a telecom organization said: “We had a lot of sellers who were emailing prospects using poor grammar and messaging. Things were off-brand and we wanted to standardize that messaging and put it into an organized structure. The fear is that if we give sellers too much autonomy to create their own messaging that they will go off-brand.”
-
Poor reporting analytics. Interviewees explained that their organizations’ reporting was static and disconnected from core systems like their CRMs. Their prior systems prevented their organizations from uniting engagement and activity data to scale analytics and forecasting workflows. This prevented teams from effective and accurate decision-making and forecasting. The global head of GTM at a software organization said, “Before, reporting analytics never made it to the CRM.”
The chief customer officer at a software organization said: “For reporting, we used our CRM and a combination of spreadsheets. We had to pump data between the two.”
Investment Objectives
Forrester research states, “Over the next few years, revenue orchestration will move toward increasingly dynamic and coordinated execution across go-to-market workflows, not just sales.”2 This sentiment was shared amongst the interviewees’ organizations. They searched for a solution that could:
-
Systemize sales outreach.
-
Support complex revenue organization structures.
-
Meet operational scaling needs.
-
Integrate with existing platforms (e.g., CRMs, business analytics tools, email, enablement tools).
-
Act as a partner — not just a tool.
-
Augment and automate existing workflows and create new agentic workflows to reduce manual effort and improve decision-making and execution.
Interviewees selected Outreach to help standardize and scale revenue execution while improving productivity and revenue performance. In deploying Outreach, they first standardized workflows, then improved visibility and intelligence, and now focus on leveraging AI and agentic capabilities to drive execution and decision-making.
Composite Organization
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
-
Description of composite. The composite is a B2B organization with $9 billion in annual revenue and 20,000 employees. Its revenue organization has 6,000 employees and is made up of sales development representatives (SDRs), sales reps, sales leadership, customer success, professional services, and revenue operations.
-
Deployment characteristics. Outreach is typically deployed across revenue teams, functions, and business units rather than across an organization’s employee population. The composite invests in Outreach Engage, Meet, Deal, and Forecast. It is also piloting Amplify. There are 600 Outreach users. Of these users, 15% are SDRs, 35% are sales reps, 10% are sales leadership, 15% are customer success employees, 15% work in professional services, and 10% are in operations. Its use cases cover prospecting, managing deals, customer retention, sales coaching, and forecasting.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
-
B2B operations
-
$9 billion in annual revenue
-
20,000 employees
-
600 Outreach users across the revenue organization
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Productivity lift across the revenue organization | $1,539,000 | $1,692,900 | $1,923,750 | $5,155,650 | $4,243,524 |
| Btr | Profit increase from sales effectiveness | $4,347,067 | $4,962,445 | $5,742,930 | $15,052,442 | $12,367,821 |
| Ctr | Profit increase from sales efficiency | $762,646 | $952,097 | $1,165,414 | $2,880,156 | $2,355,764 |
| Dtr | Prior tool retirement | $90,000 | $90,000 | $90,000 | $270,000 | $223,817 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $6,738,713 | $7,697,441 | $8,922,094 | $23,358,248 | $19,190,926 |
Productivity Lift Across The Revenue Organization
Evidence and data. According to Forrester research, revenue orchestration platforms automate routine tasks and enhance decision-making and execution, minimizing friction and manual effort for sellers across the funnel.3
Interviewees reported that Outreach reduced the time sales, customer success, and professional services teams spent on administrative and manual outreach activities to improve productivity across the revenue organization. Prior to Outreach, users relied on manual processes to manage prospect and customer communications, update records, conduct research, and prepare meeting notes, limiting the time available for customer-facing work. By standardizing communications through templates and automated workflows, centralizing activity tracking and reporting, and leveraging capabilities such as conversational intelligence, AI-powered guidance, and sales engagement automation, Outreach streamlined day-to-day activities and reduced manual effort for the interviewees’ organizations. Interviewees reported that users were able to spend more time engaging customers and advancing revenue-generating activities while improving consistency and effectiveness across outreach motions.
Interviewees shared that most measurable value today comes from workflow standardization, automation, execution consistency, and visibility. Interviewees also reported early success with AI and agentic capabilities, which represent a source of future value as adoption matures.
-
The chief customer officer at a software organization said, “I would estimate 40% time savings for a rep in a day on admin activities [like] making sure everything is tracked, making sure they touched every customer, and trying to find the relevant content based on the customer.”
The same interviewee continued, discussing customer success managers (CSMs) and the benefits they experienced from Outreach: “Everything I shared on the sales side absolutely applies on the CSM side and more because CSMs do a lot more communication. Sometimes communication is about adoption, sometimes it’s escalation, sometimes it’s usage. There’s no way we can touch every customer. It’s helped us really set up our digital touch motion for our scaled organization. This has been hugely beneficial. Kaia is also ingrained in everybody’s KPIs and OKRs [objectives and key results]. We listen to recordings and look at the keyword output. Based on that, we’ve built individual enablement plans. The workload was so off balance that we spent 70% or 80% on manual activity, and 20% with our customers. We flipped it the other way.”
Finally, the chief customer officer concluded with a discussion of the benefits experienced by professional services: “My whole professional services team sits in Outreach. We used to send manual emails to our customers to schedule trainings or ask about objectives and goals. We’ve templated and automated this. I would say about 30% of time savings in their day-to-day.”
-
The senior director of sales, processes, and applications at a telecom organization shared that in a small sample conducted over two months, their users were able to save about 3 minutes per email communication when leveraging Kaia-generated meeting summaries, call insights, and follow-up support. They said: “We’ve got a big push to look at AI this year. We’re looking at conversational intelligence through a pilot. It drives seller efficiency when meeting with their customers. It’s taking more robust notes.”
This same interviewee also mentioned the dialer, stating: “Sellers like the dialer to reference back to their calls. There are also email efficiencies. Our sellers get asked some common questions, and [with Outreach], they can quickly drag and drop snippets we’ve created into an email, so they don’t constantly have to look up information all the time. That’s a big time-saver.” -
The head of global GTM at a software organization explained Outreach user count has grown at their organization from an initial rollout of 1,000 users to 7,000 users. They said: “Outreach has been good at going above and beyond into integrations which are not out of the box. They give a lot of emphasis and effort to any and every tool that we’ve asked them to integrate with. And in some cases, we are working with them right from the development stage.”
The interviewee also noted the impact on reporting: “There is a high degree of impact on reporting analytics because everything now comes straight out of the system. In the past, it never made it to the CRM. We’re really able to get that going now.”
The head of global GTM also noted: “I would say SDRs spend about 30% of their time on research. I would argue 5 hours of per SDR reduction in manual data management on a weekly basis. That is phenomenal.” -
The head of revenue operations at an industrial tech organization said: “The agent work [is starting] to surface [revenue] context [and engagement signals] that [helps sellers identify next actions faster]. This is to be further verified in an extended pilot. The first strategy is to support the existing workflows that reps feel comfortable using.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
There are 90 SDRs using Outreach who dedicated 30% of their time to admin activities in the prior environment.
-
There are 210 sales reps using Outreach who dedicated 30% of their time to admin activities in the prior environment.
-
There are 90 customer success professionals using Outreach who dedicated 50% of their time to admin activities in the prior environment.
-
There are 90 professional services professionals using Outreach who dedicated 40% of their time to admin activities in the prior environment.
-
With Outreach, these users gain a 20% productivity lift in Year 1, 22% in Year 2, and 25% in Year 3.
-
The average fully burdened annual salary across the revenue organization is $100,000.
-
Fifty percent of the recaptured work is spent on productive activities.
-
While individual interviewees reported productivity gains ranging from 30% to 40% in specific functions, Forrester applied a lower blended productivity assumption across all user populations to account for uneven adoption, differences in workflows, and variability in realized value.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
The number of Outreach users and their associated time dedicated to admin activities.
-
The extent to which Outreach users adopt the full platform capabilities.
-
Salaries across the revenue organization.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.2 million.
Up to 1.5 hours per week
Time saved on admin activities for Outreach SDR users by Year 3
Up to 2.5 hours per week
Time saved on admin activities for Outreach customer success users by Year 3
Productivity Lift Across The Revenue Organization
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | SDRs using Outreach | Composite | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| A2 | Percentage of SDRs’ time on admin activities in prior environment | Interviews | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
| A3 | Sales reps using Outreach | Composite | 210 | 210 | 210 | |
| A4 | Percentage of sales reps’ time on admin activities in prior environment | Interviews | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
| A5 | Customer success professionals using Outreach | Composite | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| A6 | Percentage of customer success professionals’ time on admin activities in prior environment | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| A7 | Professional services professionals using Outreach | Composite | 90 | 90 | 90 | |
| A8 | Percentage of professional services professionals’ time on admin activities in prior environment | Composite | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| A9 | Blended productivity lift on admin activities using Outreach | Interviews | 20% | 22% | 25% | |
| A10 | Average fully burdened annual salary across the revenue organization | Composite | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| A11 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| At | Productivity lift across the revenue organization | ((A1*A2)+(A3*A4)+(A5*A6)+(A7*A8))*A9*A10*A11 | $1,710,000 | $1,881,000 | $2,137,500 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Productivity lift across the revenue organization (risk-adjusted) | $1,539,000 | $1,692,900 | $1,923,750 | ||
| Three-year total: $5,155,650 | Three-year present value: $4,243,524 | |||||
Profit Increase From Sales Effectiveness
Evidence and data. Forrester research has found that revenue orchestration platforms enable organizations to consistently execute revenue strategy at scale, moving beyond isolated tools to increase seller productivity and ensure timely, relevant, and coordinated customer engagement.4
Interviewees explained that Outreach increased sales effectiveness by improving engagement rates, driving more meetings and opportunities, and accelerating pipeline generation. Prior to Outreach, interviewees’ organizations struggled with inconsistent and untimely outreach that limited prospect engagement and sales conversion. By standardizing best practice sales motions through curated sequences, automating follow-up activities, and enabling more targeted and timely customer interactions, Outreach helped their sales teams execute more effective revenue workflows at scale.
-
The chief customer officer at a software organization estimated a 10% increase in response rates with Outreach: “We’ve definitely increased the number of meetings, customer engagements, and response rate from our customers. We’ve now been able to contact intentionally and in a timely manner.”
-
The head of revenue operations at an industrial technology organization said: “What we see is that if you apply globally curated sequences, we get more meetings booked [and] more opportunities created. It creates a bigger impact [within the sales funnel].” Based on a proof of concept with Amplify, they shared that their organization experienced an 11% reply rate, two meetings booked from 84 AI-driven emails, an estimated 76% open rate and 28% click rate on targeted sequences, and a 100% positive reply rate in targeted sequences.
-
The senior director of sales, processes, and applications at a telecom organization said: “Revenue is higher when Outreach is used. We’re looking at meetings booked and held.” They shared a 28% increase in meetings booked and an increase in opportunities won attributed to sequences up 3.5% with the usage of Outreach.
-
The global head of GTM at a software organization said: “The primary KPI we track is pipeline generation. There was a 44% to 45% increase in pipeline generation within the first quarter of implementation of Outreach.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Forrester modeled sales effectiveness and sales efficiency as separate sources of value. Sales effectiveness reflects improvements in conversion rates achieved through more consistent execution, better sequencing, stronger follow-up discipline, and improved coaching outcomes. To avoid double counting, the effectiveness model assumes the same prospect volume before and after Outreach and measures only conversion-rate improvements.
While both benefits originate from Outreach usage, they reflect different economic mechanisms. Sales effectiveness captures improvements in conversion performance for existing prospecting activity. -
There are 300 salespeople using Outreach, of whom 30% are SDRs.
-
Each SDR contacts 3,000 prospects annually.
-
In the prior environment, the prospect response rate was 10%, the response rate to meeting booked was 40%, the meeting booked to sales accepted lead was 45%, and the sales accepted lead to opportunity won was 22%.
-
With Outreach, the prospect response rate increases to 10.5% in Year 1, 10.6% in Year 2, and 10.7% in Year 3.
-
The response rate to meeting booked increases to 44% in Year 1, 44.4% in Year 2, and 44.8% in Year 3.
-
The meeting booked to sales accepted lead increases to 54% in Year 1, 54.9% in Year 2, and 56% in Year 3.
-
The sales accepted lead to opportunity won increases to 22.2% in Year 1, 22.3% in Year 2, and 22.4% in Year 3.
-
The average deal size is $100,000 and the profit margin is 12%.
-
Forrester intentionally modelled improvements in individual funnel conversion rates. However, because these gains occur across multiple stages of a high-volume sales funnel, their impact compounds over time. Applied across 270,000 annual prospect interactions, even modest improvements in response rates, meeting conversion, qualification, and win rates can generate a significant increase in opportunities won and associated profit.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
The number of SDRs using Outreach and the number of prospects each contacts in a year.
-
The sales funnel conversion rates prior to Outreach.
-
The extent to which Outreach is used for both prospecting and managing deals.
-
The average deal size and profit margin.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $12.4 million.
25%
Increase in the number of meetings booked that are qualified as sales accepted leads by Year 3
Profit Increase From Sales Effectiveness
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Salespeople using Outreach | Composite | 300 | 300 | 300 | |
| B2 | Percentage of salespeople that are SDRs | Composite | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
| B3 | Prospects contacted per SDR annually | Composite | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| B4 | Subtotal: Total prospects contacted | B1*B2*B3 | 270,000 | 270,000 | 270,000 | |
| B5 | Prospect response rate before Outreach | Composite | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
| B6 | Relative increase with Outreach | Interviews | 5% | 6% | 7% | |
| B7 | Subtotal: Prospect response rate with Outreach | B5*(1+B6) | 10.5% | 10.6% | 10.7% | |
| B8 | Response to meeting booked before Outreach | Composite | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| B9 | Relative increase with Outreach | Interviews | 10% | 11% | 12% | |
| B10 | Subtotal: Response to meeting booked with Outreach | B8*(1+B9) | 44.0% | 44.4% | 44.8% | |
| B11 | Meeting booked to sales accepted lead before Outreach | Composite | 45% | 45% | 45% | |
| B12 | Relative increase with Outreach | Interviews | 20% | 22% | 25% | |
| B13 | Subtotal: Meeting booked to SAL with Outreach | B11*(1+B12) | 54.0% | 54.9% | 56.3% | |
| B14 | SAL to opportunity won before Outreach | Composite | 22% | 22% | 22% | |
| B15 | Relative increase with Outreach | Interviews | 1% | 1.5% | 2% | |
| B16 | Subtotal: SAL to opportunity won with Outreach | B14*(1+B15) | 22.2% | 22.3% | 22.4% | |
| B17 | Average deal size | Composite | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| B18 | Profit margin | Composite | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| Bt | Profit increase from sales effectiveness | ((B4*B7*B10*B13*B16)-(B4*B5*B8*B11*B14)) *B17*B18 | $5,114,197 | $5,838,170 | $6,756,388 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Btr | Profit increase from sales effectiveness (risk-adjusted) | $4,347,067 | $4,962,445 | $5,742,930 | ||
| Three-year total: $15,052,422 | Three-year present value: $12,367,821 | |||||
Profit Increase From Sales Efficiency
Evidence and data. Interviewees explained that in addition to improving conversion rates across the sales funnel, Outreach caused the number of prospects contacted in a given year to increase. As administrative activities were automated with Outreach, SDRs gained increased capacity for their daily selling activities.
-
The senior director of sales, processes, and applications at a telecom organization shared that their organization saw a 6.2% increase in prospects contacted when assessing the usage of Outreach over a six-month period: “Our BDR [business development representative] team is especially bought into Outreach. It has helped them quickly engage their prospects. The BDR leader used Outreach at a prior company and held his reps accountable. I can’t imagine that they would be as efficient as they are now if they didn’t have Outreach available.”
-
The global head of GTM at a software organization said: “We’ve been able to grow our corporate midmarket business over the last three years at a significantly higher growth rate than our enterprise business. A lot of that has to do with the fact that we are relying on two channels for pipeline. One is SDRs and the other is marketing. The results have had a strong impact from the rollout of Outreach.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Forrester modeled sales effectiveness and sales efficiency as separate sources of value. Sales efficiency reflects the additional prospecting capacity created through workflow automation and reduced administrative effort. To avoid double counting, the efficiency model captures the incremental revenue generated from additional prospect volume enabled by reclaimed selling time.
While both benefits originate from Outreach usage, they reflect different economic mechanisms. Sales efficiency captures incremental pipeline generated from additional prospecting capacity created through automation. -
With Outreach, the number of prospects contacted increases 5% in Year 1, 6% in Year 2, and 7% in Year 3.
-
With Outreach, the prospect response rate is 10.5% in Year 1, 10.6% in Year 2, and 10.7% in Year 3.
-
The response rate to meeting booked is 44% in Year 1, 44.4% in Year 2, and 44.8% in Year 3.
-
The meeting booked to sales accepted lead is 54% in Year 1, 54.9% in Year 2, and 56.3% in Year 3.
-
The sales accepted lead to opportunity won is 22.2% in Year 1, 22.3% in Year 2, and 22.4% in Year 3.
-
The average deal size is $100,000 and the profit margin is 12%.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
The extent to which Outreach is used for prospecting activities to increase SDR capacity.
-
The sales funnel conversion rates prior to Outreach.
-
The average deal size and profit margin.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.4 million.
7%
Increase in prospects contacted by Year 3
Profit Increase From Sales Efficiency
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Total prospects contacted | Composite | 270,000 | 270,000 | 270,000 | |
| C2 | Increase in prospects contacted with Outreach | Interviews | 5% | 6% | 7% | |
| C3 | Net-new prospects contacted with Outreach | C1*C2 | 13,500 | 16,200 | 18,900 | |
| C4 | Prospect response rate with Outreach | Composite | 10.5% | 10.6% | 10.7% | |
| C5 | Response to meeting booked with Outreach | B10 | 44.0% | 44.4% | 44.8% | |
| C6 | Meeting booked to SAL with Outreach | B13 | 54.0% | 54.9% | 56.3% | |
| C7 | SAL to opportunity won with Outreach | B16 | 22.2% | 22.3% | 22.4% | |
| C8 | Average deal size | Composite | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| C9 | Profit margin | Composite | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| Ct | Profit increase from sales efficiency | C3*C4*C5*C6*C7*C8*C9 | $897,230 | $1,120,114 | $1,371,075 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Ctr | Profit increase from sales efficiency (risk-adjusted) | $762,646 | $952,097 | $1,165,414 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,880,156 | Three-year present value: $2,355,764 | |||||
Prior Tool Retirement
Evidence and data. Interviewees explained that in transitioning to Outreach, their organizations retired both point solutions and internally developed applications that previously supported their revenue organization.
-
The chief customer officer at a software organization said: “We eliminated our prior [conversational intelligence solution]. We like Kaia better.”
-
The head of GTM at a software organization said, “Outreach helped us replace some internally [developed] applications.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes that it retires a prior point solution worth $100,000 in transitioning to Outreach.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
Whether any prior solutions are retired and how many are retired if they are.
-
Whether additional internally created spreadsheets or applications are retired. This may result in additional overhead savings.
-
The associated costs and retirement schedule of these solutions.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $224,000.
Prior Tool Retirement
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Cost of prior point solution | Composite | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| Dt | Prior tool retirement | D1 | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | Prior tool retirement (risk-adjusted) | $90,000 | $90,000 | $90,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $270,000 | Three-year present value: $223,817 | |||||
Unquantified Benefits
Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Creates unified system of action across the revenue organization. Interviewees explained that having a centralized platform for roles across the revenue organization created new ways of working and sharing insight. The chief customer officer at a software organization said: “We use Outreach because sales, customer success, and professional services is in it and work closely together. It has enhanced collaboration.”
The composite organization uses Outreach as a shared system of action to improve handoffs between teams, accelerate issue resolution, and create a more unified customer experience throughout the revenue lifecycle. This benefit could be quantified by measuring reductions in time spent gathering customer information, coordinating across teams, or resolving customer issues. -
Drives forecasting and revenue visibility. Interviewees reported that Outreach improved forecast transparency, consistency, and scalability. By providing real-time visibility into forecast data and involving sellers directly in the forecasting process, Outreach enabled the interviewees’ organizations to create a more structured and reliable forecasting motion while improving alignment and confidence across sales leadership teams. The chief customer officer at a software organization said: “Sales does the forecasting. We used to do it in [a spreadsheet] before. We use forecasting in Outreach now, and it’s made it cleaner and scalable. You can pull up the data anytime.”
The head of revenue operations at an industrial technology organization said: “Especially on the forecast side, users appreciate the transparency. Sellers and account managers are getting better data quality on their contacts with Outreach. They are handling opportunities [better], which results in smarter and easier forecast submission. Every week, the entire organization is submitting a forecast. Forecast attainment is getting better.”
The composite organization uses Outreach to centralize revenue data, engagement signals, and pipeline insights to identify risks earlier, improve forecast consistency, and make more informed business decisions. This benefit could be quantified by measuring improvements in forecast accuracy, reductions in forecasting effort, or decreases in forecast variance.
-
Improves sales coaching and best practice execution through AI-driven insights. Forrester research states, “Revenue orchestration platforms turn tacit knowledge (what top reps know) into institutional assets by capturing the dynamics of seller and buyer interaction (conversations, objections, and responses). This allows sales teams to codify winning plays and patterns, preserving knowledge and creating a key feedback loop for enablement programs and sales messaging.”5
Interviewees reported that Outreach improved sales manager’s effectiveness by increasing visibility into seller activity, performance metrics, and customer interactions. This provided more guidance on how reps were performing, where additional support was needed, and how to promote rep accountability. The chief customer officer at a software organization said: “It has been efficient and effective for managers to track the KPIs and metrics and drive accountability. They’re consuming the data and outcomes to make decisions and drive actions and outcomes. That’s where their value-add is as a leader.”
The global head of GTM at a software organization said: “There’s been good impact with coaching and enablement. The discussions are less about data management and more around tactics to drive better productivity. The feedback loops get a lot more effective.”
The composite organization’s managers can identify coaching opportunities more quickly, reinforce successful behaviors, and scale best practices across the revenue organization. At the same time, sellers gain clearer expectations, more objective performance feedback, and greater accountability for pipeline and customer engagement activities. This benefit could be quantified by measuring reductions in manager coaching preparation time, improvements in ramp time for new sellers, or increases in quota attainment and seller productivity. -
Improves customer retention, renewals, and relationship quality. Interviewees reported that Outreach enabled more coordinated, timely, and relevant engagement with customers throughout the customer lifecycle. By providing shared engagement history, workflow automation, customer insights, and coordinated account management capabilities, Outreach helped their revenue teams engage customers with greater consistency and context while reducing redundant or conflicting communications.
The chief customer officer at a software organization said, “There are many pieces that play into renewals and customer retention, but Outreach is a key part of our renewal rate growth.”
The same interviewee added, “The quality of customer relationships has increased because naturally there’s more value that customers get when you’re in front of them.”
The head of GTM at a software organization said: “Outreach helps with our inbound and outbound teams to ensure there is more synchronization. [In the past], we had situations where a customer has an active engagement and they are still receiving outbound communications from us. Additionally, our time to response for marketing has improved and is generally within hours.”
The composite organization uses Outreach to support retention and renewal motions through automated engagement workflows, customer insights, and coordinated account management activities. This benefit could be quantified by measuring improvements in renewal rates, customer retention rates, customer satisfaction scores, Net Promoter ScoresSM (NPS), customer engagement rates, or expansion revenue.6 -
Enables communication outreach strategy. Forrester research states that with a platform like Outreach, previously siloed insights become actionable. This allows go-to-market teams to adapt how they engage buyers based on context and evidence.7 Interviewees explained how standardized, automated communication enabled with Outreach helped guide content plans across their revenue organizations. The chief customer officer at a software organization said: “Outreach has been hugely helpful in defining our communication and engagement strategy. [We can better understand] how many follow-ups we need and what response rate for customers is based on communication.”
By analyzing communication performance and capturing insights from customer interactions, Outreach helps the composite identify which messaging, cadences, and engagement approaches generate the strongest outcomes. This benefit could be quantified by measuring improvements in campaign performance, response rates, engagement rates, or time required to design and deploy communication programs. -
Promotes brand consistency. Interviewees shared that centralizing content within Outreach for users to easily reference and use in communications improved brand messaging and consistency.
For the composite organization, this helps maintain a consistent brand experience across geographies, business units, and customer-facing roles. This benefit could be quantified by measuring reductions in content creation effort, compliance review requirements, or incidents of off-brand customer communications.
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Outreach and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
-
Moving toward autonomous workflow orchestration. Forrester research states, “The next phase [of B2B revenue orchestration] will emphasize goal-driven orchestration, with systems being able to evaluate intent signals, prioritize opportunities, and autonomously adjust multistage playbooks to optimize for outcomes like win rates, deal velocity, and retention.”8 Interviewees said their organizations were in the early stages of measuring the impact of AI and agentic capabilities within Outreach. They were exploring new ways to move beyond automating particular tasks toward surfacing new insights to realize additional benefits through greater productivity, increased pipeline creation, improved conversion, enhanced forecasting visibility, and more effective customer retention.
The composite organization expects to expand its use of Outreach’s AI and agentic capabilities over time. As AI agents gain access to a broader set of the composite’s engagement, pipeline, and customer signals, Outreach will enable the composite to identify opportunities and risks more proactively, recommend next-best actions, automate additional execution tasks, and help coordinate activities across the revenue organization.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etr | Outreach fees | $0 | $1,776,600 | $1,776,600 | $1,776,600 | $5,329,800 | $4,418,141 |
| Ftr | Implementation and optimization | $1,037,080 | $54,208 | $45,408 | $45,408 | $1,182,104 | $1,158,003 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $1,037,080 | $1,830,808 | $1,822,008 | $1,822,008 | $6,511,904 | $5,576,144 |
Outreach Fees
Evidence and data. Interviewees explained that pricing depended on the number and type of Outreach solutions adopted. Pricing may vary. Contact Outreach for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
There are 600 total Outreach users.
-
It invests in Outreach Engage, Meet, Deal, and Forecast.
-
The annual cost per user is $2,820.
Risks. The impact of this cost may vary by organization depending on the following:
-
The number of Outreach users.
-
The Outreach products that are adopted.
-
Any negotiated discounts.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.4 million.
Outreach Fees
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Outreach users | Composite | 600 | 600 | 600 | |
| E2 | Per user fee | Outreach | $2,820 | $2,820 | $2,820 | |
| Et | Outreach fees | E1*E2 | $0 | $1,692,000 | $1,692,000 | $1,692,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Etr | Outreach fees (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $1,776,600 | $1,776,600 | $1,776,600 | |
| Three-year total: $5,329,800 | Three-year present value: $4,418,141 | |||||
Implementation And Optimization
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that implementing Outreach involved configuring integrations, designing and deploying revenue workflows, establishing reporting and forecasting processes, and training end users. Implementation efforts were supported by cross-functional teams that typically included sales, sales operations, marketing, sales enablement, and IT. Interviewees said that following deployment, their organizations continued to engage with Outreach customer success teams, train users, monitor adoption, and refine best practices.
-
The head of revenue operations at an industrial tech organization said: “It took about three months to enable the setup of Engage and two months for Forecasting. We worked quite fast. It took us 20 people for 4,500 users. Forecasting was rolled out over eight months in three areas: Asia, Europe, and Americas. Now, every week the entire organization is submitting a forecast.”
-
The senior director of sales, processes, and applications at a telecom organization said: “We got the first group implemented within seven months. There were 20 different resources across the organization working on this. We had representatives from marketing, sales, and sales enablement. We have several hours in our new-hire training dedicated to Outreach as well.
The same interviewee also discussed ongoing Outreach management, stating: “Ongoing enablement has been great. Our CSM is willing to conduct refresher trainings with our team members and share best practices. We’ve also been working on seller education to provide frequently asked questions to our sales organization. This requires hours per month.” -
The chief customer officer at a software organization said: “Users need about 6 to 8 hours of training over time. In addition, my ops team meets with their CSM on a biweekly basis. We find out about new features, functionality, our data usage, and best practices. It is a lot of useful information. At a leadership level, I meet with their leader on the strategic roadmap so they can understand my challenges and where I need support.”
-
The head of GTM at a software organization said: “I spend once every two months to discuss change management [with Outreach] and really figure out adoption. Where are the roadblocks?”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
It pays $50,000 implementation fees to Outreach.
-
13,800 hours are dedicated to implementation. This includes the cumulative effort distributed across multiple functions.
-
It pays $8,000 to pilot Amplify as part of its broader AI roadmap.
-
Each Outreach user receives 8 hours of initial training. Each subsequent year, it receives an additional hour of training.
-
Outreach admin dedicate 5 hours per week to activities like user configuration and platform maintenance.
-
The average fully burdened hourly rate across the revenue organization is $48.
Risks. The impact of this cost may vary by organization depending on the following:
-
The complexity of implementation (number and type of resource involved).
-
The number of users trained and the length of training.
-
The extent to which Outreach is administered on an ongoing basis.
-
Types of implementation and ongoing activities, including CRM administration effort, sequence management, content maintenance, forecasting process redesign, and change management.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.2 million.
Implementation And Optimization
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Implementation fee | Outreach | $50,000 | |||
| F2 | Implementation time (hours) | Interviews | 13,800 | |||
| F3 | Amplify pilot fee | Outreach | $8,000 | |||
| F4 | Training hours per end user | Interviews | 4,800 | 600 | 600 | 600 |
| F5 | Ongoing management time (hours) | Interviews | 260 | 260 | 260 | |
| F6 | Average fully burdened hourly rate across the revenue organization | A10 / 2080 | $48 | $48 | $48 | $48 |
| Ft | Implementation and optimization | F1+F3+((F2+F4+F5)*F6) | $942,800 | $49,280 | $41,280 | $41,280 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Ftr | Implementation and optimization (risk-adjusted) | $1,037,080 | $54,208 | $45,408 | $45,408 | |
|
Three-year total: $1,182,104 |
Three-year present value: $1,158,003 |
|||||
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($1,037,080) | ($1,830,808) | ($1,822,008) | ($1,822,008) | ($6,511,904) | ($5,576,144) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $6,738,713 | $7,697,441 | $8,922,094 | $23,358,248 | $19,190,926 |
| Net benefits | ($1,037,080) | $4,907,905 | $5,875,433 | $7,100,086 | $16,846,344 | $13,614,782 |
| ROI | 244% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Outreach.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Outreach can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Outreach stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Outreach.
Interviews
Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Outreach to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Composite Organization
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Supplemental Material
Related Forrester Research
Three Revenue Tech Categories Converge Into One: Revenue Orchestration Platforms, Forrester Research, Inc., April 5, 2024.
The B2B Sales Leader’s AI Toolkit, Forrester Research, Inc., August 12, 2025.
The Forrester Wave™: Revenue Orchestration Platforms For B2B, Q3 2026, Forrester Research, Inc., September 24, 2026.
Appendix C
Endnotes
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
2 Source: The Revenue Orchestration Platforms For B2B Landscape, Q1 2026, Forrester Research, Inc., Mar 17, 2026.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 Net Promoter, NPS, and the NPS-related emoticons are registered U.S. trademarks, and Net Promoter Score and Net Promoter System are service marks, of Bain & Company, Inc., Satmetrix Systems, Inc. and Fred Reichheld.
7 Source: The Revenue Orchestration Platforms For B2B Landscape, Q1 2026, Forrester Research, Inc., Mar 17, 2026
8 Ibid.
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Outreach and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Outreach.
Outreach reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Outreach provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Sarah Lervold
Published
September 2026