Total Economic Impact

New Technology: The Projected Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft’s AI Solutions For Media And Entertainment Organizations

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Microsoft’s AI Solutions

A Forrester New Technology Projected Total Economic Impact Study Commissioned By Microsoft, December 2025

[CONTENT]

Total Economic Impact

New Technology: The Projected Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft’s AI Solutions For Media And Entertainment Organizations

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Microsoft’s AI Solutions

A Forrester New Technology Projected Total Economic Impact Study Commissioned By Microsoft, December 2025

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Today, more than ever, media and entertainment businesses face pressure to streamline costs, innovate, and grow. Simultaneously, adopting generative AI (genAI) and agentic AI has become a competitive necessity for enterprises.1 Forrester recommends investing in AI capabilities to augment complex processes and eliminate manual, toilsome tasks, and by pairing people with agentic AI, they can achieve more together than either could accomplish on their own.2 By uniting people’s creativity with AI, media and entertainment organizations can transform parts of their businesses, content, and experiences, thereby potentially increasing revenue, optimizing costs, and supporting employees.

Microsoft’s AI solutions — including Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio, and Microsoft Foundry — help media and entertainment organizations facilitate innovation, automate creative workflows, and deliver personalized content experiences. Built on enterprise-grade security, compliance, and responsible AI frameworks, these solutions can facilitate productivity, cost efficiency, and audience engagement. Through Microsoft’s partner ecosystem, organizations can also deploy tailored AI capabilities and access expertise for industry-specific challenges.

Although this case study focuses on Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio, and Microsoft Foundry, Microsoft has additional AI solutions and capabilities.

Microsoft commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) media and entertainment enterprises may realize by deploying Microsoft’s AI solutions.3 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Microsoft’s AI solutions on their organizations.

118%–251%

Projected return on investment (ROI)

 

$27.5M–$58.7M

Projected net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed ten decision-makers from five organizations and surveyed 314 respondents with experience using Microsoft’s AI solutions. All interviewees and survey respondents worked in the media and entertainment industry — including the subindustries of streaming, film, studio and animation, advertising, broadcasting, cable and satellite, sports and live experiences, publishing, news, and more. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a media and entertainment organization that spans multiple subindustries. It has 10,000 employees, $2.5 billion annual revenue, and leverages Microsoft’s AI solutions to transform its business.

Interviewees said that prior to using Microsoft’s AI solutions, their organizations faced common challenges. The media and entertainment industry was evolving as AI advanced, and interviewees recognized their organizations had numerous opportunities to significantly transform the creative process, their content, the experiences they delivered, and more. However, their prior technologies made this unrealistic, leaving them with non-maximized content and data, time-consuming and repetitive work, and unfulfilled potential.

After the investment in Microsoft’s AI solutions, the interviewees’ organizations engaged in go-to-market, operations, and people and culture transformations. They transformed business and creative processes; innovated with their products, content, and services; and enhanced delivered experiences. They enabled employees to excel, do more, and accomplish what was previously impossible. Key results from the investment and transformations included increased revenue, optimized costs, and thriving employees.

Key Findings

Quantified projected benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

Go-To-Market Transformation

  • Product and market innovation worth up to $8.5 million in operating profits. The composite organization innovates with Microsoft’s AI solutions, creating new products and content and reaching new or previously underserved audiences and markets. AI empowers and accelerates the creative process and enables new and broader cost-effective content distribution with better analytics. This yields up to 1.5% revenue growth in Year 2 and up to 3% revenue growth in Year 3 for $87.3 in incremental net-new revenue across all three years.

  • Marketing, sales, and customer service improvements worth up to $15.1 million in operating profits. Adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions enables the composite organization to transform how it goes to market with its content, experiences, and services. With Microsoft’s AI solutions, the employees in these functions work more efficiently and effectively to better market, sell, and retain. By Year 3, it generates or pursues up to 4% more opportunities, wins up to 6% more business, and retains up to 3% more revenue. Altogether, this yields $154.3 million in incremental net-new revenue across all three years.

Operations Transformation

  • Labor efficiencies worth up to $26.2 million. The composite organization’s employees spend less time on low-value manual tasks and more time on higher-value creative tasks. Its employees use AI to produce, distribute, and manage content more efficiently and effectively than previously possible. This also extends to broader business support functions. The composite saves up to 12 hours per employee per month in Year 3.

  • External spend reduction worth up to $20.5 million. Besides operating more efficiently, the composite organization optimizes its external spending. First, by using Microsoft’s AI solutions and developing with AI, it reduces third-party software spend by up to 7% in Year 3. Second, the composite’s employees are more efficient, and it can reduce the need to outsource manual work for tasks such as media asset management, resulting in up to 9% savings in Year 3.

People And Culture Transformation

  • Employee attrition reduction and onboarding acceleration worth up to $11.7 million. The composite organization’s employees have access to Microsoft’s AI solutions, which enable a better employee experience. For example, they spend less time on repetitive tasks and more time on the creative and value-driving tasks they enjoy. This manifests in up to a 12% reduction in employee attrition in Year 3. Additionally, AI enables better knowledge management and transfer resulting in up to 50% faster onboarding for new employees and internal transfers.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Security and compliance strength. The composite organization mitigates risks associated with unauthorized AI use, such as unintentional data leaks, by leveraging Microsoft’s AI solutions. The enterprise also benefits from Microsoft’s security solutions, ecosystem, and compliance frameworks as it integrates and develops agents.

  • Data analysis and insights improvements. The composite organization better capitalizes on its vast array of content and data. It is able to utilize, analyze, and gain insights from this data better and faster.

Flexibility. Microsoft customers might adopt these AI solutions and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • New, unexpected use cases and opportunities. The composite organization uncovers new AI use cases and opportunities as it adopts Microsoft’s AI solutions and enables its employees. This reduces barriers and unlocks new initiatives that previously were impossible.

  • Speed and agility at the forefront of AI advancement. As a result of its investment in Microsoft’s AI solutions, the composite organization operates with greater speed, agility, and scale.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Microsoft’s AI solutions licensing and consumption costs of $7.4 million. The composite organization pays for Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio, and Azure. Eighty percent of its employees have Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses by Year 3. It builds agents with Copilot Studio and Microsoft Foundry.

  • Implementation, management, and development costs of $5 million. After choosing to adopt Microsoft’s AI solutions, the composite organization invests the necessary time and partner support to implement and manage the solutions. This also includes investing in professional development with AI such as creating its own agents and developing an agentic AI technology platform.

  • Training, discovery, and employee agent development costs of $8.4 million. To realize the transformative benefits of AI, the composite organization enables employees to use AI effectively and appropriately with proper training and support for discovery. To drive further transformative benefits, it encourages and supports employee agent development.

Forrester evaluated the likelihood and risk associated with the potential benefits and modeled a base-case scenario as the most likely outcome. Forrester also modeled a range for the upside potential, which media and entertainment organizations that fully embrace genAI and agentic AI transformation may realize. This financial analysis projects that the composite organization accrues the following three-year net present value (NPV) for each scenario by enabling Microsoft’s AI solutions:

  • Upside potential high-end impact of a $58.7 million NPV and projected ROI of 251%.

  • Upside potential low-end impact of a $40.8 million NPV and projected ROI of 175%.

  • Baseline scenario impact of a $27.5 million NPV and projected ROI of 118%.

Percentage increase in revenue due to product and market innovation and improved marketing, sales, and customer service (Year 3)

Up to 7.45%

Percentage decrease in operating expenses due to improved employee productivity and optimized spend (Year 3)

Up to 1.55%

“Microsoft have a fantastic pedigree in productivity tools. They have tried and trusted platforms, like Azure, to build out capabilities.”

AI leader, advertising

“We are on an exciting AI journey. AI has a lot of potential. It is about how we apply to the use cases. Microsoft has been very engaging in helping us realize some of those use cases.”

Vice president, sports and live experiences

Key Statistics

118%–251%

Projected return on investment (PROI) 

$50.9M–$82.1M upside potential range

Projected benefits PV 

$27.5M–$58.7M

Projected net present value (PNPV) 

$23.4M

Total costs 

Three-Year Projected Financial Analysis For The Composite Organization

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Low impact NPV Mid impact NPV High impact NPV PROI of

“Because of AI, we can provide a more compelling return on investment case because we know we can [reach a larger scale cost-effectively].”

Director of digital media and audience development, sports and live experiences

The Microsoft AI Solutions Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the investment in Microsoft’s AI solutions
Interviews
Role Subindustry Region Revenue Employees
• AI leader
• Vice president, strategic partnerships
Advertising Global, based in Europe $20 billion 100,000+
• Head of responsible AI
• Head of emerging technology
• Director of AI and automation
Advertising Global, based in Asia $10 billion 60,000+
• Head of colleague productivity and technology
• Managing director, strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation
• Chief AI officer
Advertising Global, based in Europe $2 billion 25,000
Vice president Sports and live experiences Global, based in North America $20 billion 1,000+
Director of digital media and audience development Sports and live experiences Global, based in Europe Undisclosed <1,000
Key Challenges

Before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions, interviewees shared common challenges that drove them to adopt genAI and agentic AI enterprisewide. AI was disrupting the media and entertainment industry, and it presented both an opportunity and a threat: Competitors were transforming, and they had to do the same to survive. And they realized their organizations had vast amounts of content and data that they could not maximize; time-consuming, repetitive work; and ultimately, unfulfilled potential. With evolving employee, client, and consumer expectations, AI transformation was becoming an increasing priority, and they did not want to maintain the status quo.

Interviewees and survey respondents noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • AI advancement and disruption. Interviewees explained that AI was advancing quickly and disrupting the media and entertainment industry. Most survey respondents agreed that it was critical to adopt AI, but before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions, 38% of survey respondents struggled to keep up with the pace of AI innovation. They recognized a need to adapt. The head of emerging technology at an advertising organization said, “We need to be proactive to survive.”

“How much do you agree with the following statements?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

  • Unrealized transformation opportunities. Interviewees’ organizations had untapped transformation opportunities that they could not successfully execute with prior technologies. As a result, they could not fully capitalize on their content and data, their employees engaged in less valuable work, and they could not realize their potential. For example, the managing director of strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation at an advertising organization said: “There are areas where we can automate that were not possible with approaches like robotic process automation. These things require end-to-end transformation, which agentic AI can do.”
    Interviewees also elaborated on the possibilities they now saw with AI. They saw opportunities to transform the creative process, their content, the experiences they delivered, and more. The director of digital media and audience development at a sports and live experiences organization said, “We have been exploring the role that AI tools can play in content creation, in terms of aiding discovery and in terms of synthesizing or aggregating large volumes of content and analyzing them.” The vice president at a sports and live experiences organization said, “Our AI strategy has been about enabling productivity and gaining operational efficiency.” They added that it was also about delivering the best consumer experience.

“Which of the following are drivers for your organization to adopt Microsoft’s AI solutions?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

“What benefits do you expect to achieve by adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

  • Evolving consumer, client, and employee expectations. As the industry was advancing, so were expectations from consumers, clients, and employees, according to the interviewees. The interviewees’ organizations needed to adapt to meet them. Employees were starting to expect AI solutions as standard, as were clients that had experienced AI-augmented and accelerated services. The director of digital media and audience development at a sports and live experiences organization said: “It started with an understanding that consumption of our product is changing quite significantly and continues to do so. As the product becomes more interesting and appeals to a broader group of people, what they need has more variety and breadth to it. We are not just delivering a core product for a core set of fans anymore. We need to deliver a much more varied and differentiated experience for a much broader and differentiated group of fans and set of audiences.”

“We are in an industry that is going to be disrupted. Therefore, you may as well be the disruptor yourself. You have to change.”

Managing director, strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation, advertising

Solution Requirements

The interviewees’ organizations chose Microsoft’s AI solutions because of:

  • Its technological capabilities to deliver on their desired transformation opportunities.

  • The Microsoft ecosystem integration.

  • Its strong partnership and support.

  • Microsoft’s credibility in the media and entertainment industry and its subindustries.

“Microsoft has the credibility to [help] based on its experience in sports, but also the advancement of Copilot.”

Director of digital media and audience development, sports and live experiences

“We said, ‘Let’s go all in with Microsoft.’ … Microsoft’s willingness to partner with us was what won the day.”

Managing director, strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation, advertising

Survey Insights

Prioritizing AI Use Cases

Forrester defines an AI use case as a business scenario or process that AI (whether generative or predictive) optimizes or enables, thus improving a business metric or outcome.4

Survey respondents reported how their organizations defined and prioritized use cases, most frequently citing the expected benefits and costs.

“How did or will your organization define and prioritize AI use cases?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a global media and entertainment enterprise based in North America that spans multiple media and entertainment subindustries. It has annual revenue of $2.5 billion and 10,000 employees who all benefit from Microsoft’s AI solutions in some way. Specifically, it licenses Microsoft 365 Copilot for its employees and pays consumption costs for Copilot Studio and Azure as it develops with AI and builds agents. With these AI solutions, it undertakes creative and business transformations.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using the AI solutions in Year 1, following a four-month implementation period. It initially deploys Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses for 35% of its employees and scales this to 80% by Year 3.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $2.5 billion revenue

  • 10,000 employees

  • Media and entertainment industry spanning multiple subindustries

  • Uses Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio, and Azure

  • Transforms its creative processes, content, experiences, products, services, and business with AI

Reference Table
Ref. Metric Source Value
R1 Employees Composite $10,000
R2 Percentage of employees using Microsoft’s AI solutions Composite Initial: 0%
Year 1: 35%
Year 2: 60%
Year 3: 80%
R3 Revenue before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions Composite $2,500,000,000
R4 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee5 Research data $46
R5 Internal transfer rate Composite 15%
R6 Fully burdened hourly rate for an IT employee Composite $65
R7 Operating margin before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions Composite 9.76%

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Projected Benefits
Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total projected benefits – Baseline scenario $4,496,220 $19,713,696 $40,619,456 $64,829,372 $50,897,782
Total projected benefits – Upside potential low $6,415,260 $25,019,840 $50,085,760 $81,520,860 $64,139,780
Total projected benefits – Upside potential high $9,494,720 $32,306,792 $62,193,760 $103,995,272 $82,058,483
Business Transformation: Product And Market Innovation

Evidence and data. Interviewees told Forrester that Microsoft’s AI solutions enabled their organizations to transform their businesses, facilitating product and market innovation. They explained that AI allowed or would allow them to create new products, content, and services and serve new markets or audiences that they otherwise could or would not due to cost or scale. They were empowering and accelerating the creative process. As a result, they expected incremental net-new revenue.

  • First, some interviewees discussed being able to create new products, content, services, or other offerings due to AI.

    • The head of responsible AI at an advertising organization explained how their team had rapidly prototyped and built a new product. They said: “The tools we built integrate generative AI capabilities into them, so from a capability perspective, no generative AI, no tool. Also, in terms of expediting that timeline, it would not have happened because they would not have been able to get the business case together and the funding to secure professional developers.”
    • The vice president at a sports and live experiences organization talked about the revenue potential of data with AI. They said: “There is a lot we could do in the context of the game and broadcasting scenarios with ball tracking and player tracking and how we apply computer vision. Those stats really excite fans, and we also work with legalized sports betting partners to share that data. There is potential there.”

  • Second, interviewees discussed being able to reach new audiences with AI.

    • The managing director of strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation at an advertising organization described how they are using agents to unlock the value of historical information and serve customers that they otherwise would not, saying: “We have 40 years of interviews. We can now use that history to target small- and medium-size enterprises. Agentic AI enables us to create a lighter version of what we do with our large customers. This requires a different approach that is only possible because of AI.” They estimated that in a few years, revenues from this new offering would be worth 4% of current revenues. They added: “That’s new margin and new customers that we’re pushing into. … We can do it only because of AI and because of the deal we struck with Microsoft.”
    • The director of digital media and audience development at a sports and live experiences organization also discussed how they planned to reach and better serve underserved audiences by using Microsoft’s AI solutions. They explained the value of being able to localize and personalize substantial content for their global audiences, which would be impossible at that scale without AI. They explained: “It is all English now. We plan to introduce seven languages as a pilot.” They continued: “It is significant. We think it is the number-one lever for growth and it goes back to the global nature of our business. We are available to watch in over 200 territories.” They shared a goal to double their total addressable audience through this AI-driven personalization, localization, and scaling.

  • Survey respondents reported a median 2% increase in top-line revenues via new revenue streams and new markets (realized or expected) with Microsoft’s AI solutions. All media and entertainment subindustries reported expected or realized increases.

  • Sixty-three percent of survey respondents said that revenue growth would come from creation, 56% said experience and engagement, and 53% said personalization and monetization.

“If you are not credible in the AI game, someone else will eat your lunch. It’s better you lead the thinking in your space rather than pretend it doesn’t exist. … Over the next three years, we will have three new offerings in the market, and each is potentially worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.”

Chief AI officer, advertising

Up to 3%

Revenue growth from bringing new solutions to market and expanding to new market segments (Year 3)

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It has base revenue of $2.5 billion.

  • The composite innovates with Microsoft’s AI solutions by creating new products, content, services, and experiences; enhancing existing offerings; and expanding to new audiences or markets.

  • It takes time to innovate, so there is no Year 1 revenue impact. The composite organization realizes up to 1.5% revenue growth in Year 2 and up to 3% revenue growth in Year 3.

  • The average media and entertainment operating margin is 9.76%.

Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $2.8 million (baseline) to $8.5 million (upside potential high).

Business Transformation: Product And Market Innovation: Range Of Three-Year Cumulative Impact, PV

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Business Transformation: Product And Market Innovation
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Revenue before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions R3 $2,500,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $2,500,000,000
A2Baseline     0.00% 0.50% 1.00%
A2Upside low Revenue growth from bringing new solutions to market and expanding to new market segments Interviews and survey 0.00% 1.00% 2.00%
A2Upside high     0.00% 1.50% 3.00%
A3Basline     $0 $12,500,000 $25,000,000
A3Upside low Subtotal: Incremental revenue A1*A2 $0 $25,000,000 $50,000,000
A3Upside high     $0 $37,500,000 $75,000,000
A4 Operating margin before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions R7 9.76% 9.76% 9.76%
AtBaseline     $0 $1,220,000 $2,440,000
AtUpside low Business transformation: Product and market innovation A3*A4 $0 $2,440,000 $4,880,000
AtUpside high     $0 $3,660,000 $7,320,000
Three-year projected total: $3,660,000 to $10,980,000 Three-year projected present value: $2,841,473 to $8,524,418
Go-To-Market Transformation: Improved Marketing, Sales, And Customer Service

Evidence and data. Interviewees told Forrester that there were opportunities to transform how their organizations go to market with Microsoft’s AI solutions through improved marketing, sales, and customer service functions. Microsoft 365 Copilot, the broader Microsoft ecosystem, and AI agents transformed how they bring their products, content, experiences, and services to market.

  • First, interviewees and survey respondents reported transforming their marketing and business development functions with AI.

    • The managing director of strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation at an advertising organization described using agents to aid with assessing and responding to RFPs. For more than 80% of the RFPs, they reduced the time to respond from weeks to one day and improved the quality.
    • The chief AI officer at an advertising organization also spoke about using agents to improve ads. Different agents work together on storyboarding and creating different creative elements. Other agents then analyze the ad concept and suggest improvements. The goal is for agentic AI to get the effort to the 80% mark and for humans to do the rest.
    • Survey respondents in marketing roles reported that their organizations have realized or expect to realize:
      • A 33% faster time to proposal.
      • A 46% increase in campaign response rates.
      • A 32% higher content engagement rate.
      • A 20% improved brand sentiment/affinity.
    • Survey respondents in sales and customer success roles reported that their organizations have realized or expect to realize:
      • A 35% improved conversion rate.
      • A 30% increase in opportunities.
      • A 10% increase in opportunities pursued.

  • Second, interviewees and survey respondents reported transforming their sales functions with AI.

    • In addition to being able to respond to RFPs faster, interviewees also explained that they were able to make better pitches. The head of responsible AI at an advertising organization said: “We are looking at deploying an AI assistant to help with the repetitive tasks we have to do for every request for information and RFP. That can allow the team to do [more and larger pitches].”
    • The AI leader at an advertising organization explained that they were converting at a higher rate due to improved product quality with AI.
    • Survey respondents in sales and customer success roles reported that their organizations have realized or expect to realize:
      • A 26% improved win rate.
      • A 15% faster sales cycle.
      • A 16% larger average deal size.
      • A 14% larger average revenue per customer.
      • A 40% better upsell/cross-sell rate.

  • Lastly, interviewees and survey respondents also reported transforming their retention and customer service functions with AI.

    • The head of colleague productivity and technology at an advertising organization described using agents to provide client services teams with comprehensive views of their clients and improve interactions. They said, “We are reducing the admin overload so people can spend more time with clients.”
    • The managing director of strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation at the same advertising organization said that agentic AI “will have a big impact on customer retention” and estimates that the churn rate should decrease by one-third.
    • The chief AI officer at the same organization explained that agentic AI democratizes data analysis and insights for more users working with customers. This improves the value delivered to customers, increasing revenue and customer retention. In one example that brings together multiple agents, they elaborated: “A user may ask an orchestrator bot a question to understand what is happening in a [consumer market]. The orchestration agent will work with specialized agents to look at different cuts of the data and come up with a go-to-market plan.” Their in-house team is using these tools initially, but the longer-term goal is to make them available for customer self-service.
    • Survey respondents in marketing roles reported that their organizations have realized or expect to realize:
      • A 30% improved customer experience score.
    • Survey respondents in sales and customer success roles reported that their organizations have realized or expect to realize:
      • A 20% improved customer retention rate.

“[Microsoft’s AI solutions] are going to help us reinforce our business model but could also help create new opportunity.”

Director of digital media and audience development, sports and live experiences

Up to 3 percentage points

Increase in retention rate from improved engagement and customer service (Year 3)

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It uses Microsoft’s AI solutions for marketing, sales, and customer service functions driving go-to-market value. The value it derives increases year over year as adoption, proficiency, and AI development increase.

  • By transforming its marketing and business development functions, the composite organization generates or pursues up to 1% more opportunities in Year 1, up to 2% more opportunities in Year 2, and up to 4% more opportunities in Year 3.

  • By transforming its sales functions, the composite organization wins up to 1.5% more opportunities in Year 1, up to 3% more opportunities in Year 2, and up to 6% more opportunities in Year 3.

  • With better engagement and customer service, the composite organization retains up to 0.75% more customers in Year 1, up to 1.5% in Year 2, and up to 3% in Year 3.

Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $8.9 million (baseline) to $15.1 million (upside potential high).

Go-To-Market Transformation: Improved Marketing, Sales, And Customer Service: Range Of Three-Year Cumulative Impact, PV

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Go-To-Market Transformation: Improved Marketing, Sales, And Customer Service
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Revenue before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions R3 $2,500,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $2,500,000,000
B2 Percentage of revenue from new customer acquisition Composite 20% 20% 20%
B3Baseline     0.50% 1.00% 2.00%
B3Upside low Increase in opportunities from improved marketing and business development Interviews and survey 0.75% 1.50% 3.00%
B3Upside high     1.00% 2.00% 4.00%
B4Baseline     $2,500,000 $5,000,000 $10,000,000
B4Upside low Subtotal: Incremental revenue from increased opportunities B1*B2*B3 $3,750,000 $7,500,000 $15,000,000
B4Upside high     $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $20,000,000
B5Basline     0.50% 2.00% 4.00%
B5Upside low Increase in win rates from improved sales Interviews and survey 1.00% 2.50% 5.00%
B5Upside high     1.50% 3.00% 6.00%
B6Basline     $2,512,500 $10,100,000 $20,400,000
B6Upside low Subtotal: Incremental revenue from improved win rates ((B1*B2)+B4)*B5 $5,037,500 $12,687,500 $25,750,000
B6Upside high     $7,575,000 $15,300,000 $31,200,000
B7 Revenue from retained customers B1*(1-B2) $2,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000
B8Baseline     0.25% 1.00% 2.00%
B8Upside low Increase in retention rate from improved engagement and customer service Interviews and survey 0.50% 1.25% 2.50%
B8Upside high     0.75% 1.50% 3.00%
B9Basline     $5,000,000 $20,000,000 $40,000,000
B9Upside low Subtotal: Incremental revenue from improved customer retention B7*B8 $10,000,000 $25,000,000 $50,000,000
B9Upside high     $15,000,000 $30,000,000 $60,000,000
B10Baseline     $10,012,500 $35,100,000 $70,400,000
B10Upside low Subtotal: Incremental revenue from improved marketing, sales, and customer service B4+B6+B9 $18,787,500 $45,187,500 $90,750,000
B10Upside high     $27,575,000 $55,300,000 $111,200,000
B11 Operating margin before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions R7 9.76% 9.76% 9.76%
BtBaseline     $977,220 $3,425,760 $6,871,040
BtUpside low Go-to-market transformation: Improved marketing, sales, and customer service B10*B11 $1,833,660 $4,410,300 $8,857,200
BtUpside high     $2,691,320 $5,397,280 $10,853,120
Three-year projected total: $11,274,020 to $18,941,720 Three-year projected present value: $8,881,902 to $15,061,326
Operations Transformation: Labor Efficiencies

Evidence and data. Interviewees told Forrester that their employees saved time on repetitive, low-value tasks with Microsoft’s AI solutions and were able to refocus the time savings on higher-value work. This work included more creative tasks that the employees enjoyed most and drove the most value for their organizations. Agents also enabled the interviewees’ organizations to do what previously was impossible, further amplifying the capabilities of their employees throughout the creative process.

  • Interviewees’ organizations realized clear productivity gains with Microsoft 365 Copilot. They conducted internal surveys and used Viva Insights to measure the value.

    • With Microsoft 365 Copilot, the head of responsible AI at an advertising organization explained: “We saw 15 to 30 minutes [of time savings] per day on average with people reporting that they were using that time on higher-level, more strategic tasks. … We were seeing an increase in focus hours and uninterrupted time through the Viva Insights, so an improvement in working habits.”
    • The head of colleague productivity and technology at an advertising organization estimated, “I get in an extra half day a week of work that I would not be able to do otherwise.”
    • The vice president at an advertising organization said, “Copilot has been an absolute game changer for us in terms of productivity.”

  • Interviewees shared specific examples of how agents, including those built by Microsoft and their organizations, drove labor efficiency.

    • The vice president at a sports and live experiences organization described a complex back-office document processing use case with multiple handoffs that consumed 700 hours. They said: “We landed on agentic AI as the best path forward for solving this because of the potential of building smaller agents for divvying up tasks that we have in the business process. They can do the work for that business process and have the flexibility to have a human in the loop to review and approve the agent’s work.” They estimated: “We are being super conservative in our KPIs with this. The goal is to save 30% of the manual work.”
    • The head of colleague productivity and technology at an advertising organization also described early success with Facilitator Agent: “We have 130 people testing Facilitator Agent, and they all think it is very useful. Everyone previously liked that they were able to get a meeting summary, but Facilitator tracking action follow-ups is really powerful; nobody has to log actions, which saves time. It also helps people stick to agendas. I think we can reduce every meeting by 10 minutes, which saves a lot of time and frees up rooms.”
    • The chief AI officer at an advertising organization shared an example of AI for data analytics, saying: “In the past, someone needed to ask the data science team to do the analysis, even for something as simple as a SQL query. What could take three days of elapsed time can now be done in minutes.”
    • The same chief AI officer also shared how teams can test new product ideas faster, saying: “If there are 50 ideas to test for a client, it can take weeks or months. Using avatars for testing, our teams will be able to complete the work in a single day.”

  • Survey respondents reported that their organizations have realized or expect to realize the following time savings per functional area:

[CONTENT]
  Percentage of employees who have saved / will save time with Microsoft’s AI solutions  Percentage of time saved with Microsoft’s AI solutions
Content management 50% 44%
Creation 40% 35%
Content distribution 40% 27%
Localization and accessibility 38% 43%
Business support 35% 30%
Experience/engagement 35% 29%
Personalization/monetization 26% 25%
Production 25% 20%
Security and compliance 25% 20%
Data and insights 18% 24%
Base: 202 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting
 

“Our employees can go deeper and do more than they would have done previously.”

Head of colleague productivity and technology, advertising

Up to 12

Hours saved per employee per month (Year 3)

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • An increasing percentage of employees benefit from productivity gains as the composite organization grows Microsoft 365 Copilot adoption and develops agents.

  • To be conservative, Forrester excludes employees in the marketing, sales, and customer services functions that drove value in the prior benefit.

  • With Microsoft’s AI solutions, the average employee in the composite organization realizes up to 10 hours of time saved per month in Year 1, up to 11 hours in Year 2, and up to 12 hours in Year 3.

  • The composite organization’s employees recapture up to 50% of this time for productive work on higher-value tasks.

Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $16.9 million (baseline) to $26.2 million (upside potential high).

Operations Transformation: Labor Efficiencies: Range Of Three-Year Cumulative Impact, PV

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Operations Transformation: Labor Efficiencies
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Employees benefiting from Microsoft’s AI solutions R1*R2 3,500 6,000 8,000
C2 Percentage of employees excluding marketing, sales, and customer service functions Composite 60% 60% 60%
C3Baseline     6 7 8
C3Upside low Time saved per employee per month (hours) Interviewees and survey 7 8 9
C3Upside high     10 11 12
C4 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee R4 $46 $46 $46
C5 Productivity recapture rate Composite 50% 50% 50%
CtBaseline     $3,477,600 $6,955,200 $10,598,400
CtUpside low Operations transformation: Labor efficiencies C1*C2*C3*12 months*C4*C5 $4,057,200 $7,948,800 $11,923,200
CtUpside high     $5,796,000 $10,929,600 $15,897,600
Three-year projected total: $21,031,200 to $32,623,200 Three-year projected present value: $16,872,289 to $26,245,920
Operations Transformation: External Spend Optimization

Evidence and data. In addition to labor efficiencies, interviewees also explained that their organizations optimized and saved on external spend for software and services. This spend could then be saved or reallocated to higher-value services.

  • The director of AI and automation for an advertising organization noted the potential for software cost savings, saying, “We are looking at consolidating our tech stack.” They added: “Over time, when these agents can integrate more, there will be cost savings from removing elements of our stack. There is repetition already.”

  • The chief AI officer at an advertising organization said that they often needed to pay third parties to aid with data collection and using agents would reduce this cost.

  • The director of digital media and audience development at a sports and live experiences organization explained how they could now realize more value from a multimillion-dollar services contract by having it deliver creative value instead of manual work. They said: “If 50% of the output was run-of-the-mill elements that can be automated and AI-generated and the other 50% was concentrated on genuine storytelling, then those [run-of-the-mill] elements would be replaced and reduced.”

  • Survey respondents in finance/accounting and operations roles reported that their organizations have realized or expect to realize the following cost savings per functional area:

[CONTENT]
  Percentage of third-party software costs saved / expected to save with Microsoft’s AI solutions Percentage of outsourcing contracts costs saved / expected to save with Microsoft’s AI solutions
Localization and accessibility 22% 25%
Content management 20% 28%
Content distribution 17% 21%
Data and insights 15% 29%
Personalization/monetization 15% 27%
Experience/engagement 15% 25%
Business support 15% 22%
Production 13% 18%
Creation 10% 20%
Security and compliance 8% 15%
Base: 187 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting
 

“The value of the AI solutions from Microsoft is operational efficiency.”

Vice president, sports and live experiences

Up to 9%

Percentage reduction in outsourcing spend with Microsoft’s AI solutions

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Based on Forrester research on IT and software spending, the composite organization spends approximately 0.6% of its baseline revenue on third-party software and systems.6

  • The composite organization also spends approximately 8% of its baseline revenue on outsourced services.

  • By adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions and transforming its operations, the composite organization reduces its third-party software spend by up to 3% in Year 2 and up to 7% in Year 3. It also reduces its outsourcing spend by up to 3.5% in Year 2 and up to 9% in Year 3. This value increases year over year as it realizes more value from Microsoft’s AI solutions and can later replace and reduce other systems, solutions, and services.

  • The composite organization does not recognize any savings in Year 1 as it takes time to find and capitalize on potential savings opportunities.

Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $15.5 million (baseline) to $20.5 million (upside potential high).

Operations Transformation: External Spend Optimization: Range Of Three-Year Cumulative Impact, PV

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Operations Transformation: External Spend Optimization
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Revenue before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions R3 $2,500,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $2,500,000,000
D2 Percentage of revenue spent on third-party software before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions Composite 0.62% 0.62% 0.62%
D3 Third-party software spend before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions D1*D2 $15,500,000 $15,500,000 $15,500,000
D4 Percentage of revenue spent on outsourced services before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions Composite 8.00% 8.00% 8.00%
D5 Outsourced services spend before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions D1*D4 $200,000,000 $200,000,000 $200,000,000
D6Baseline     0.00% 2.00% 5.00%
D6Upside low Percentage reduction in third-party software spend with Microsoft’s AI solutions Interviewees and survey 0.00% 2.50% 6.00%
D6Upside high     0.00% 3.00% 7.00%
D7Baseline     0.00% 2.50% 7.00%
D7Upside low Percentage reduction in outsourcing spend with Microsoft’s AI solutions Interviewees and survey 0.00% 3.00% 8.00%
D7Upside high     0.00% 3.50% 9.00%
DtBaseline     $0 $5,310,000 $14,775,000
DtUpside low Operations transformation: External spend optimization (D3*D6)+(D5*D7) $0 $6,387,500 $16,930,000
DtUpside high     $0 $7,465,000 $19,085,000
Three-year projected total: $20,085,000 to $26,550,000 Three-year projected present value: $15,489,106 to $20,508,264
People And Culture Transformation: Reduced Employee Attrition And Accelerated Onboarding

Evidence and data. In addition to go-to-market and operations transformations, interviewees’ organizations also underwent people and culture transformations. This included enabling their employees with the best AI solutions and improving the employee experience. This resulted in reducing employee attrition and accelerating onboarding for new employees and internal movers.

  • Retention-wise, interviewees noted that Microsoft’s AI solutions enabled employees to focus on the more creative and higher-value work that they enjoyed. Employees expected AI solutions and employers could present them as an investment in empowering their people. Additionally, most survey respondents in human resources roles agreed or strongly agreed that Microsoft’s AI solutions would reduce employee attrition and enhance the employee experience. Put simply, AI tools would allow people to do the job they were hired to do, not all the accompanying (and until now, necessary) busywork. Survey respondents reported that their organizations had realized or expected to realize a 24% reduction in employee attrition rates due to AI tool use.

  • The managing director of strategic supplier relationships and AI transformation at an advertising organization described a range of agentic AI use cases to support joiners, leavers, and transfers. For example, they provided new hires with agentic data mining tools, “which will reduce the time to be fully productive from six months down to two or three months.” For transfers, it will reduce the time to productivity from two months to one month.

  • Most survey respondents in human resources roles also agreed or strongly agreed that Microsoft’s AI solutions would accelerate onboarding for new employees. They reported that their organizations had realized or expected to realize 32% faster new employee onboarding.

“We want people to use [Microsoft’s AI solutions] because they make their lives better.”

AI leader, advertising

Up to 50%

Reduction in onboarding time

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In terms of a retention impact, all employees can potentially benefit from Microsoft’s AI solutions. For example, HR employees may develop agents for organizationwide use or otherwise use AI to augment and extend the value they deliver.

  • Before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions, the employee attrition rate is 20%. Postadoption, this declines by up to 6% in Year 2 and 12% in Year 3, resulting in fewer leavers. It takes the composite organization time to improve the employee experience, so there is no impact in Year 1.

  • The average cost to hire a new employee is 30% of their fully burdened annual salary.

  • The time to onboard a new employee was previously 40 days. This falls by up to 20% in Year 1, up to 30% in Year 2, and up to 50% in Year 3.

  • Similarly, the time to transfer to a significantly different role internally previously took 20 days. The composite can reduce the time this takes by up to 30% in Year 1, up to 40% in Year 2, and up to 50% in Year 3.

  • The composite organization realizes year-over-year improvements to these metrics as it better manages knowledge, creates employee experience agents, and as more employees benefit from using the AI solutions.

  • The productivity of new hires and internal transfers is lower than the average employee. Additionally, Forrester assumes those employees will recapture 50% of the time saved for productive work.

Results. This yields a three-year projected PV ranging from $6.8 million (baseline) to $11.7 million (upside potential high).

People And Culture Transformation: Reduced Employee Attrition And Accelerated Onboarding: Range Of Three-Year Cumulative Impact, PV

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

People And Culture Transformation: Reduced Employee Attrition And Accelerated Onboarding
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Employees R1 10,000 10,000 10,000
E2 Employee attrition rate before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions Composite 20% 20% 20%
E3Baseline     0.00% 4.00% 8.00%
E3Upside low Percentage reduction in employee attrition rate Interviews and survey 0.00% 5.00% 10.00%
E3Upside high     0.00% 6.00% 12.00%
E4 Cost to hire a new employee (rounded) R4*2,080 hours*30% $28,700 $28,700 $28,700
E5Baseline     $0 $2,296,000 $4,592,000
E5Upside low Subtotal: Improved employee retention E1*(E2*E3)*E4 $0 $2,870,000 $5,740,000
E5Upside high     $0 $3,444,000 $6,888,000
E6Baseline     2,000 1,920 1,840
E6Upside low New employees onboarded E1*(E2-(E2*E3)) 2,000 1,900 1,800
E6Upside high     2,000 1,880 1,760
E7 Time to onboard a new employee before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions (days) Composite 40 40 40
E8Baseline     0% 10% 30%
E8Upside low Percentage reduction in onboarding time Interviews and survey 10% 20% 40%
E8Upside high     20% 30% 50%
E9 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee R4 $46 $46 $46
E10 Productivity of new hire during ramp up Composite 30% 30% 30%
E11 Productivity recapture rate Composite 50% 50% 50%
E12Baseline     $0 $423,936 $1,218,816
E12Upside low Subtotal: Accelerated new employee onboarding E6*E7*8 hours per day*E8*E9*E10*E11 $441,600 $839,040 $1,589,760
E12Upside high     $883,200 $1,245,312 $1,943,040
E13 Existing employees transferring to a significantly different role E1*R5 1,500 1,500 1,500
E14 Time to transfer to a new role before adopting Microsoft’s AI solutions (days) Composite 20 20 20
E15Baseline     10% 20% 30%
E15Upside low Percentage reduction in transfer time Interviews 20% 30% 40%
E15Upside high     30% 40% 50%
E16 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee R4 $46 $46 $46
E17 Productivity of a transfer during ramp up Composite 60% 60% 60%
E18 Productivity recapture rate Composite 50% 50% 50%
E19Baseline     $41,400 $82,800 $124,200
E19Upside low Subtotal: Accelerated existing employee mobility E13*E14*E15*E16*E17*E18 $82,800 $124,200 $165,600
E19Upside high     $124,200 $165,600 $207,000
EtBaseline     $41,400 $2,802,736 $5,935,016
EtUpside low People and culture transformation: Reduced employee attrition and accelerated onboarding E5+E12+E19 $524,400 $3,833,240 $7,495,360
EtUpside high     $1,007,400 $4,854,912 $9,038,040
Three-year projected total: $8,779,152 to $14,900,352 Three-year projected present value: $6,813,012 to $11,718,555
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but could not quantify:

  • Strengthened security and compliance. Interviewees and survey respondents explained that using Microsoft’s enterprise-caliber AI solutions had a positive security impact. This included protecting their customers’ data in their AI agents and products and preventing data leaks from their employees using unauthorized AI solutions. The head of responsible AI at an advertising organization detailed how there was a data protection benefit, saying: “It is a baseline expectation from our employees that we are going to have AI capabilities and tools to make their lives easier. If we do not put enterprise tools in their hands, they are going to use other tools regardless.”

  • Improved data analysis and insight. The interviewees explained the importance of data and how their organizations’ investments in Microsoft’s AI solutions helped them better capitalize on it. This included everything from sports statistics to research to older content and more structured and unstructured information. Sixty-one percent of survey respondents agreed that Microsoft’s AI solutions would help their organizations by improving data analysis and insights. The chief AI officer at an advertising organization shared that the first pillar of their AI strategy is about data: “We have a lot of proprietary datasets that we can use. Bringing together datasets with clever AI will create a lot of new opportunities for us.”

“How much do you agree with the following statements?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

“We have 30 years of statistical data, 30 years of video archive, and 15 to 20 years of written material and photography. There is no way we would ever be able to make use of that content without AI.”

Director of digital media and audience development, sports and live experiences

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Microsoft’s AI solutions and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • New, unexpected use cases and opportunities. Interviewees and survey respondents were excited about the new AI use cases and opportunities their organizations were uncovering. In fact, 67% of survey respondents strongly agreed or agreed that Microsoft’s AI solutions would help their organizations by reducing barriers or unlocking new opportunities/initiatives. For example, the vice president at a sports and live experiences organization said, “Our partnership with Microsoft has opened the doors to evaluating several different avenues, whether it is minimizing manual work or making the game experience more enticing.”

  • Speed and agility at the forefront of AI advancement. The interviewees said that their organizations were ambitiously pursuing AI transformation with speed, agility, and scale. This was enabled thanks to Microsoft’s AI solutions’ integration with the broader Microsoft ecosystem. Overall, 81% of survey respondents strongly agreed or agreed that Microsoft’s AI solutions would help their organizations by making them faster, more agile, or scalable. The vice president at a sports and live experiences organization said, “We are positioning ourselves at the forefront of working with technology and making technology work our specific needs instead of having to run after technology and catch up with it.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

“When I think of Microsoft, it is productivity; it is a safe pair of hands; it is a broad suite of tools, hardware, and software that are interoperable and will enable us to have a stable productivity backbone.”

AI leader, advertising

Survey Insights

Media And Entertainment AI Use Cases

Interviewees shared that their organizations had genAI and agentic AI use cases across media and entertainment functions as well as in business support functions. Survey respondents reported that the top functional areas they have transformed or expect to transform their organization’s business with Microsoft’s AI solutions are creation (75%), experience/engagement (68%), and content management (62%). They also shared the most critical use cases for each functional area, including:

Creation

The survey respondents reported that image generation (20%), video generation (16%), and captioning/subtitling (13%) are the most critical creation use cases for their organizations.

“Which of the following are the most critical creation use cases for your organization?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

Experience/Engagement

The survey respondents reported that recommendations (58%), feedback (23%), and experience (20%) are the most critical experience/engagement use cases for their organization.

“Which of the following are the most critical experience/engagement use cases for your organization?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

Content Management

The survey respondents reported that media asset management (46%), copywriting (22%), and metadata management (19%) are the most critical content management use cases for their organizations.

“Which of the following are the most critical content management use cases for your organization?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

Business Support

The survey respondents reported data analysis and insights (25%), automation (18%), and knowledge and discovery (12%) are the most critical business support use cases for their organization.

“Which of the following are the most critical business support use cases for your organization?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

Personalization/Monetization

The survey respondents reported that monetization (41%), marketing personalization (23%), and advertising placement and timing (13%) are the most critical personalization/monetization use cases for their organizations.

“Which of the following are the most critical personalization/monetization use cases for your organization?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

Content Distribution

The survey respondents reported that distribution and delivery (42%), localization (23%), and rights management (15%) are the most critical content distribution use cases for their organization.

“Which of the following are the most critical content distribution use cases for your organization?”

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
[CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT] [CONTENT]

Base: 314 media and entertainment AI decision-makers
Source: Microsoft AI Solutions Survey, a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Ftr Microsoft’s AI solutions licensing and consumption $5,530 $1,606,624 $3,100,998 $4,485,580 $9,198,732 $7,398,988
Gtr Implementation, management, and development costs $1,283,810 $2,270,180 $2,250,490 $3,142,810 $8,947,290 $7,568,759
Htr Training, discovery, and employee agent development $0 $2,891,183 $3,299,120 $4,048,000 $10,238,303 $8,396,216
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $1,289,340 $6,767,986 $8,650,608 $11,676,390 $28,384,324 $23,363,963
Microsoft’s AI Solutions Licensing And Consumption

Evidence and data. Interviewees said that their organizations paid for Microsoft 365 Copilot, Copilot Studio, Azure, and other AI solutions from Microsoft. They had a strong understanding of their Microsoft 365 Copilot costs and many of their organizations had expanded adoption to up to 90% or more of employees after proving the benefits. When building agents with Copilot Studio and Microsoft Foundry, interviewees explained that there were many variables. They had to consider which employees or partners were developing agents, the tools used, the function of the agents and the services used, how efficient and well-built the agents were, and the use they expected internally and externally. When developing an agentic AI proof-of-concept, the vice president at a sports and live experiences organization said, “There is going to have to be a pricing conversation about which Azure services we will be using.”

“We use everything we get our hands on. We are trying the Azure AI Document Intelligence with Microsoft Foundry. We use Azure Agents. We use Copilot Studio. Our makers use Agent Builder.”

Head of colleague productivity and technology, advertising

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization licenses Microsoft 365 Copilot for 35% of its employes in Year 1, 60% in Year 2, and 80% in Year 3. It pays the list price of $30 per user per month for the AI assistant.

  • The composite organization pays consumption costs for Copilot Studio and Azure as it builds its own AI agents.

    • Copilot Studio costs are based on the number of tenants and the number of Copilot Credits consumed by developed agents. Although internal end users with Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses do not consume Copilot Credits, Forrester assumes that internal end users without Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses and external users will engage with the developed agents. Each tenant costs $200 per month. Packs of 25,000 Copilot Credits per month cost $200 per month.
    • Azure costs are based on a variety of services used to build agents with Microsoft Foundry. These include model consumption, Azure AI Services, virtual machines, storage accounts, and more. Azure AI Services include Azure AI Search, Azure AI Translator, Azure AI Vision, and more.

  • To guide Copilot Studio and Azure consumption cost calculations, Forrester referenced The Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft’s Agentic AI Solutions. As a general principle, it assumes that approximately 25% of the labor efficiency savings will go toward AI technology spend, including licenses and consumption. Please read the full case study for further detail.7

  • Pricing may vary. Contact Microsoft for more details and reference the Azure Pricing Calculator to estimate Azure consumption costs.

Risks. This cost may vary depending on:

  • What Microsoft solutions an organization deploys.

  • An organization’s size and the adoption rate of Microsoft 365 Copilot.

  • The number of agents developed, the type of agents and the services used, and the degree of adoption and use both internally and externally.

  • Pricing, how an organization pays for these solutions, and whether it uses Azure strategic pricing offers such as the Microsoft Agent prepurchase plan.8

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $7.4 million.

Microsoft’s AI Solutions Licensing And Consumption
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Employees R1 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
F2 Percentage of employees using Microsoft 365 Copilot Composite 0% 35% 60% 80%
F3 Cost of Microsoft 365 Copilot per user per month Microsoft $30 $30 $30 $30
F4 Subtotal: Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses F1*F2*F3*12 months $0 $1,260,000 $2,160,000 $2,880,000
F5 Subtotal: Copilot Studio subscriptions and Azure consumption Composite $4,809 $137,064 $536,520 $1,020,504
Ft Microsoft’s AI solutions licensing and consumption F4+F5 $4,809 $1,397,064 $2,696,520 $3,900,504
  Risk adjustment 15%        
Ftr Microsoft’s AI solutions licensing and consumption (risk-adjusted)   $5,530 $1,606,624 $3,100,998 $4,485,580
Three-year total: $9,198,732 Three-year present value: $7,398,988
Implementation, Management, And Development Costs

Evidence and data. Given the stated strategic importance of adopting genAI and agentic AI, the interviewees explained that their organizations invested sufficient resources to set the foundations for successful transformations. In addition to the cost of the AI solutions themselves, this meant investing time up front for proper implementation including technical integration, change management, governance, security, compliance, and AI development with the setup of agentic AI platforms. It also meant continuous investment as their organizations transformed.

  • Many of the interviewees’ organizations implemented Microsoft 365 Copilot and the other AI solutions quickly and at scale as they moved ambitiously in the pursuit of business transformations. The head of colleague productivity and technology at an advertising organization explained: “We have an ambitious AI strategy. We were among the first implementers of Copilot in our country with 200 people. We very quickly made the decision to give it to everybody and to roll out globally. Now, we are doing more with agentic AI, and we are moving forward fast.”

  • Implementation also included the setup of agentic AI platforms to support AI development with the right models, rules, architectures, and tools. The head of responsible AI at an advertising organization said: “Our AI strategy is about developing and deploying enterprise-level infrastructure so that we can enable decentralized solution development. We also provide training and enablement centrally so that we can all get further up on the learning curve together.” They added, “We have hundreds of models available through Microsoft Foundry, and we make those directly available to our AI builders.”

  • The interviewees also spoke about ongoing management and development. The director of digital media and audience development at a sports and live experiences organization said: “Our goal now is to move into more of a steady state of running and evolving at the same time. That will allow us to continue to fold in new functionalities, more personalization, and more localization.”

  • As a part of this ongoing management, interviewees discussed IT and business employees spending time on change management, security, data readiness, AI transformation business result measurement, and more. For example, the head of responsible AI at an advertising organization said, “We have done a lot of work closely with Microsoft with Viva Insights reporting to prove the value of AI assistants.”

  • The level of effort and cost for corporate IT-developed agents varied dramatically. Although organizations can build agents in days or months, the chief AI officer at an advertising organization described an agent they were building related to new product/service offerings that would take 1.5 years to bring to market. This organization has a team of five or six low-code developers working on agents, in addition to their full-stack developers working part time on agents.

“Our people are creating agents to help their own personal productivity. We have slightly more complex ones that involve a bit of orchestration, Azure agents, and need tech help. We have an engineering function that builds bigger ones out. Our AI strategy is multilayered from personal productivity through to client and enterprise offerings.”

Head of colleague productivity and technology, advertising

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It commits the equivalent of four FTEs from IT roles to its initial deployment of Microsoft’s AI solutions including technical integration, change management, governance, security, and compliance. It also initially commits the equivalent of 1.5 IT FTEs for AI-related development. This initial effort helps with the successful adoption of Microsoft 365 Copilot and other AI solutions and helps develop an agentic AI platform to set the foundation for building AI agents.

  • The composite organization has three FTEs per year for ongoing management. It also has six FTEs in Year 1, nine FTEs in Year 2, and 15 FTEs in Year 3 for AI development.

  • The composite organization takes advantage of professional services from a Microsoft partner during its initial deployment and postdeployment. These services include deployment, governance, security, change management, and specialist development work.

Risks. This cost may vary depending on:

  • What Microsoft solutions an organization deploys.

  • An organization’s size and degree of AI transformation pursued.

  • Whether an organization chooses to use a Microsoft partner and the degree to which they do so.

  • The fully burdened salaries of the roles engaging in this work and the cost of the professional services.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $7.6 million.

Implementation, Management, And Development Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 IT FTEs involved in technical integration, change management, governance, security, and compliance Composite 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
G2 IT FTEs involved in AI development Composite 1.5 6.0 9.0 15.0
G3 Fully burdened hourly rate for an IT employee R6 $65 $65 $65 $65
G4 Subtotal: Implementation, management, and development efforts (G1+G2)*G3*2,080 hours $743,600 $1,216,800 $1,622,400 $2,433,600
G5 Subtotal: Professional services Composite $423,500 $847,000 $423,500 $423,500
Gt Implementation, management, and development costs G4+G5 $1,167,100 $2,063,800 $2,045,900 $2,857,100
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Gtr Implementation, management, and development costs (risk-adjusted)   $1,283,810 $2,270,180 $2,250,490 $3,142,810
Three-year total: $8,947,290 Three-year present value: $7,568,759
Training, Discovery, And Employee Agent Development

Evidence and data. Interviewees’ organizations recognized that to realize the transformative benefits of AI, they needed to enable their end users to use AI effectively and appropriately. People, including their understanding, skills, and ethics, are crucial to AI success.9 They need to be ready to adapt to, collaborate with, trust, and generate business results from AI.10 Therefore, in addition to investing in the technology, its implementation, its management, and professional development, the interviewees’ organizations invested just as heavily in AI training while also enabling employee agent development.

  • The vice president at a sports and live experiences organization discussed how their organization needed to invest the time to develop AI literacy, saying, “We are building that AI core competency in the team.”

  • The head of responsible AI at an advertising organization discussed how their organization invested in training and supported employee AI development in a safe way. When initially rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot, they said, “We did a lot of change management with peer-to-peer knowledge sharing, open clinics, and continuous engagement.” They added, “I run our AI community, which includes running a variety of literacy programming from office hours to hackathon events to global live learning webinars and making sure that we can get people paired up with our enterprise-safe, compliant infrastructure so that they can innovate in a safe space.”

  • That same head of responsible AI also elaborated on the value of employee agent development, saying: “One of the really enticing benefits of genAI is that you do not necessarily need to have a full development background to be able to make progress and develop your own solutions with the lower-code tools like Copilot Studio. We have AI builders stemming from pro code to low code.”

“What you put into it is what you are going to get out of it. To have everybody get the maximum value out of those AI assistants, we recommend taking on more change management programming and communications, such as encouraging attendance at weekly clinics where they can explore Copilot.”

Head of responsible AI, advertising

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and corroborated by the survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It trains any internal end user that will have access to an AI solution from Microsoft. This is 3,500 users in Year 1, 6,000 end users in Year 2, and 8,000 end users in Year 3.

  • New end users receive 10 hours of formal training. Every user of the AI solutions spends an average of 6 hours on ongoing discovery and informal training each year.

  • In addition to having its IT staff develop agents with a Microsoft partner, the composite organization’s end users also begin to make agents. This starts at 2.5% of end users in Year 1, grows to 5% of end users in Year 2, and reaches 10% in Year 3.

  • Each end user that is involved with agent development spends 13 hours building, training, and maintaining agents in Year 1. This increases by 1 hour each year as ongoing management of existing agents increases. These agents may range from smaller personal productivity agents to larger agentic solutions that drive value for more end users.

Risks. This cost may vary depending on:

  • The number of end users needing training as influenced by an organization’s size and AI solution adoption rate.

  • The amount of training needed as influenced by the deployed AI solutions, an organization’s goals, and end users’ roles and prior knowledge.

  • Whether and the degree to which an organization encourages and supports end users in building agents.

  • The number of agents end users build and the nature of those agents.

  • The fully burdened salaries of the end users.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $8.4 million.

Training, Discovery, And Employee Agent Development
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
H1 Microsoft’s AI solutions users R1*R2 0 3,500 6,000 8,000
H2 New users H1-H1 previous year 0 3,500 2,500 2,000
H3 Formal training time per new user (hours) Interviews   10 10 10
H4 Ongoing discovery and informal training time per user (hours) Interviews   6 6 6
H5 Subtotal: Discovery and training time (hours) (H2*H3)+(H1*H4) 0 56,000 61,000 68,000
H6 Percentage of users making agents Composite 0.0% 2.5% 5.0% 10.0%
H7 Maker time to build, train, and maintain agents (hours) Composite 13 13 14 15
H8 Subtotal: Maker agent development time (hours) (H1*H6)*H7 0 1,138 4,200 12,000
H9 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee R4   $46 $46 $46
Ht Training, discovery, and employee agent development (H5+H8)*H9   $2,628,348 $2,999,200 $3,680,000
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Htr Training, discovery, and employee agent development (risk-adjusted)   $0 $2,891,183 $3,299,120 $4,048,000
Three-year total: $10,238,303 Three-year present value: $8,396,216

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Three-Year Projected Financial Analysis For The Composite Organization

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($1,289,340) ($6,767,986) ($8,650,608) ($11,676,390) ($28,384,324) ($23,363,963)
Total benefits – Baseline scenario $0 $4,496,220 $19,713,696 $40,619,456 $64,829,372 $50,897,782
Total benefits – Upside potential low $0 $6,415,260 $25,019,840 $50,085,760 $81,520,860 $64,139,780
Total benefits – Upside potential high $0 $9,494,720 $32,306,792 $62,193,760 $103,995,272 $82,058,483
Net benefits – Baseline scenario ($1,289,340) ($2,271,766) $11,063,088 $28,943,066 $36,445,048 $27,533,819
Net benefits – Upside potential low ($1,289,340) ($352,726) $16,369,232 $38,409,370 $53,136,536 $40,775,817
Net benefits – Upside potential high ($1,289,340) $2,726,734 $23,656,184 $50,517,370 $75,610,948 $58,694,520
PROI – Baseline scenario           118%
PROI – Upside potential low           175%
PROI – Upside potential high           251%

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the PROI and projected NPV for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted PROI and projected NPV values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, and using the survey to corroborate data gathered in the interviews, Forrester constructed a New Technology: Projected Total Economic Impact™ (New Tech TEI) framework for those organizations considering an investment in Microsoft’s AI solutions.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the projected impact that Microsoft’s AI solutions can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Microsoft stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Microsoft’s AI solutions.

Early-Implementation Interviews And Survey

Interviewed ten decision-makers from five organizations and surveyed 314 respondents at organizations using Microsoft’s AI solutions in pilot or beta stages to obtain data about projected costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations.

Projected Financial Model Framework

Constructed a projected financial model representative of the interviews, using the survey data to corroborate what customers said in the interviews. The financial model was risk-adjusted based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of New Tech TEI in modeling the investment’s potential impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Projected benefits

Projected benefits represent the projected value the solution delivers to the business. The New Tech TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of projected benefits and projected costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Projected costs

Projected costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The projected present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Appendix A

NEW TECHNOLOGY: Projected Total Economic Impact

New Technology: Projected Total Economic Impact (New Tech TEI) is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The New Tech TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Key Definitions

GenAI

Forrester defines genAI as set of technologies and techniques that leverage very large corpuses of data, including large language, to generate new content. Inputs for genAI may be natural language prompts or other noncode and nontraditional inputs. It is sometimes referred to as AI-generated content and can be used by a variety of roles and functions in the enterprise. GenAI includes large language models, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, and variational autoencoders. It provides the ability to create shortcuts for onerous workflow tasks, speed up delivery times, and enhance employee productivity across multiple enterprise workflows. It increases the scale and speed of analysis and knowledge synthesis for various roles such as developers, marketers, and data scientists. In the short term, it will expand the breadth of human creative expression and drive innovation in product development, design, and content creation.11

Agentic AI

Systems of foundation models, rules, architectures, and tools which enable software programs to flexibly plan and adapt to resolve goals by taking action in their environment, with increasing levels of autonomy.12

Appendix C

Survey Demographics
[CONTENT]
 ROLE  
C-level executive 8%
Vice president 19%
Director 33%
Manager 40%
[CONTENT]
SUBINDUSTRY  
Streaming 32%
Film, studio, and animation 28%
Advertising 24%
Broadcasting 22%
Cable and satellite 19%
Sports and live experiences 18%
Publishing 17%
News 17%
Media and entertainment equipment providers 14%
[CONTENT]
REGION  
North America 53%
EMEA 47%
[CONTENT]
REVENUE  
> $5B 2%
$1B to $5B 27%
$500M to $999M 35%
$400M to $499M 24%
$300M to $399M 12%
[CONTENT]
EMPLOYEES  
20,000 or more 9%
5,000 to 19,999 33%
1,000 to 4,999 41%
500 to 999 18%
[CONTENT]
AI RESPONSIBILITY  
I am the final decision-maker for my organization’s AI strategy 18%
I am a part of a team making decisions for my organization’s AI strategy 35%
I influence decisions related to my organization’s AI strategy 48%
[CONTENT]
AI ADOPTION STAGE  
Enterprisewide: Operationalizing AI across the entire enterprise 17%
Scaling: Finding new use cases to apply existing AI programs 49%
Piloting: Using AI for a few discrete use cases 34%

Appendix D

Supplemental Material

Related Forrester Research

Predictions 2026: Media And Advertising, Forrester Research, Inc., October 21, 2025.

Predictions 2026: Artificial Intelligence, Forrester Research, Inc., October 1, 2025.

Thomas Husson, Jay Pattisall, Indranil Bandyopadhyay, The Future Of GenAI For Visual Content, Forrester Blogs.

Budget Planning Guide 2026: Data, AI, And Analytics, Forrester Research, Inc., July 10, 2025.

AI Agents: Ready For Enterprises, And Moving Toward Autonomy, Forrester Research, Inc., July 8, 2025.

Ten More Top Emerging Technologies In 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., June 4, 2025.

The Top 10 Emerging Technologies In 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., April 29, 2025.

AI Agents: What It Means For B2B Marketing, Sales, And Product, Forrester Research, Inc., April 1, 2025.

Indranil Bandyopadhyay, Jay Pattisall, Pixels Unbound: The State Of GenAI For Visual Content, Forrester Blogs.

Best Practices For Gaming, Media, And Entertainment In The Cloud, 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., August 29, 2024.

Maximize The Magic Of AI Visual Content, Forrester Research, Inc., August 8, 2024.

Prepare Your Entire Workforce For AI Now, Forrester Research, Inc., March 27, 2024.

Get AI Governance Just Right, Forrester Research, Inc., July 5, 2023.

Related Forrester Case Studies

“The Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft Foundry,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft, January 2026.

New Technology: The Projected Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft Copilot Studio,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft, October 2025.

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft 365 Copilot,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft, March 2025.

Using Microsoft Azure OpenAI Service To Scale Personalized Customer Experience For Media, Entertainment, And Telecommunications,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft, July 2024.

Appendix E

Endnotes

 Source: Agentic AI Is Rising And Will Reforge Businesses That Embrace It, Forrester Research, Inc., March 7, 2025; The Generative AI Advantage, Forrester Research, Inc., November 29, 2023.

 Source: Budget Planning Guide 2026: Technology Executives, Forrester Research, Inc., July 10, 2025; With Agentic AI, Generative AI Is Evolving From Words To Actions, Forrester Research, Inc., August 8, 2024.

 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

 Source: Scale AI Value With The Use Case Selection Framework, Forrester Research, Inc., August 12, 2024.

 Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

 Source: 2025 Outsourcing Benchmarks, Global, Forrester Research, Inc., July 28, 2025.

 Source: “The Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft’s Agentic AI Solutions,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft, January 2026.

 Source: “The Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft Azure Solutions That Enhance Cost Efficiency,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Microsoft, June 2025.

 Source: J.P. Gownder, Low AIQ Threatens Employees, Customers, And Your AI Initiatives, Forrester Blogs.

 Source: J.P. Gownder, Your Employees Aren’t Ready For AI — Prepare Them With AIQ, Forrester Blogs, March 27, 2024.

 Source: Generative AI, Forrester Blogs

 Source: Agentic AI Is Rising And Will Reforge Businesses That Embrace It, Forrester Research, Inc., March 7, 2025.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Microsoft and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Microsoft’s AI solutions. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Microsoft’s AI solutions based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Microsoft or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Microsoft and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Microsoft make no warranties of any kind.

Microsoft reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Microsoft provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third-party survey partner.

Consulting Team:

Andrew Nadler
Jonathan Lipsitz

Published

December 2025