A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Marigold, April 2024
In today’s evolving digital landscape, marketers must efficiently manage and execute complex marketing campaigns, tailoring content to their customers’ unique interests by leveraging campaign and audience data. Outdated point solutions hinder marketers’ ability to personalize and automate campaigns, leading to inefficient processes and a lack of meaningful engagement with customers. However, there is opportunity for marketers to create and deliver highly personalized, cross-channel campaigns that connect with customers, drive enhanced marketing efforts, and foster stronger customer relationships.
Cheetah Digital by Marigold offers enterprise-level capabilities that enable marketers to create personalized, cross-channel campaigns with messages tailored to customer interests.
Marigold commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Cheetah Digital by Marigold.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Cheetah Digital by Marigold on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Cheetah Digital by Marigold. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a global retailer with $1 billion in revenue per year.
Interviewees said that prior to using Cheetah Digital by Marigold, their organizations contended with inefficient point solutions for email marketing campaigns. Their processes with prior email service providers (ESPs) involved process-intensive bulk email sends and labor-intensive campaign constructions without automation or templatization. Lack of advanced data capabilities also prevented segmentation and personalization efforts within the tools. Previous ESPs offered minimal partnership support, and interviewees felt they knew the tools better than the provider did.
Interviewees purchased Cheetah Digital by Marigold and then partnered with Marigold’s professional services team to resolve deliverability issues, optimize email messaging, and execute data-driven campaigns. Key results from the investment include improved customer engagement, increased customer acquisition, improved subscriber retention, avoided new hires, and maximized savings from retired solutions.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $10.38 million over three years versus costs of $2.71 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $7.67 million and an ROI of 283%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Cheetah Digital by Marigold.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Cheetah Digital by Marigold can have on an organization.
Interviewed Marigold stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Cheetah Digital by Marigold.
Interviewed four people at organizations using Cheetah Digital by Marigold to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Marigold and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Cheetah Digital by Marigold.
Marigold reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Marigold provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Nahida S. Nisa
| Role | Industry | Region | Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head of CRM | Retail | Global | $750 million |
| Vice president of digital operations | Direct marketing | United States | $1 billion |
| Senior director of email and SMS marketing | Retail | Global | $1 billion |
| Vice president of marketing and communications | Personal care | North America | $1 billion |
Before adopting Cheetah Digital by Marigold, interviewees grappled with logistics bottlenecks and audience engagement limitations in targeted campaigns. Their previous providers’ lack of advanced personalization and segmentation capabilities meant marketing content was not optimized for customers’ specific preferences and behaviors. Additionally, poor deliverability impacted outreach efforts, as emails failed to land in customers’ inboxes, thus stifling potential website traffic and revenue. These challenges underscored the need for a more comprehensive and dynamic ESP.
The interviewees described how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that could:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The billion-dollar business-to-consumer retailer is headquartered in the US and operates globally through online, catalog, and in-store sales. There are 10 FTEs on the marketing team.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using Cheetah Digital by Marigold following a six-month implementation period during which it sets up a new data structure by integrating with existing tools, cleans and migrates data, creates triggers and user journeys, and meets regularly with the Marigold team to support the overall migration and campaign templatization.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Improved customer engagement | $1,864,688 | $1,864,688 | $1,864,688 | $5,594,063 | $4,637,202 |
| Btr | Increased customer acquisition | $745,875 | $1,566,338 | $2,468,846 | $4,781,059 | $3,827,443 |
| Ctr | Improved subscriber retention | $26,583 | $29,242 | $32,166 | $87,990 | $72,500 |
| Dtr | Avoided hires from campaign labor efficiencies | $446,250 | $446,250 | $446,250 | $1,338,750 | $1,109,758 |
| Etr | Maximized savings from retired solutions | $180,000 | $360,000 | $360,000 | $900,000 | $731,630 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $3,263,395 | $4,266,517 | $5,171,949 | $12,701,862 | $10,378,533 | |
Evidence and data. With Cheetah Digital by Marigold, interviewees noted improved customer engagement from more complete customer profiles, optimized send times, and improved recency and use of data. These benefits facilitated marketing teams’ strategic campaign decisions and drove revenue from online and in-store traffic.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.6 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Subscribers to marketing messages before Cheetah Digital by Marigold | Composite | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | |
| A2 | Average number of marketing messages per subscriber | Composite | 156 | 156 | 156 | |
| A3 | Marketing message volume | A1*A2 | 468,000,000 | 468,000,000 | 468,000,000 | |
| A4 | Click rate before Cheetah Digital by Marigold | Composite | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | |
| A5 | Increased click rate attributable to Cheetah Digital by Marigold | Interviews | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| A6 | Click rate with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A4*A5+A4 | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | |
| A7 | Increased traffic attributable to Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A3*(A6-A4) | 2,340,000 | 2,340,000 | 2,340,000 | |
| A8 | Sales conversion rate | Composite | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| A9 | Incremental orders from higher click rate with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A7*A8 | 585,000 | 585,000 | 585,000 | |
| A10 | Average order value | Composite | $125 | $125 | $125 | |
| A11 | Incremental revenue from higher click rate with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A9*A10 | $73,125,000 | $73,125,000 | $73,125,000 | |
| A12 | Operating margin | Composite | 3% | 3% | 3% | |
| At | Improved customer engagement | A11*A12 | $2,193,750 | $2,193,750 | $2,193,750 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Atr | Improved customer engagement (risk-adjusted) | $1,864,688 | $1,864,688 | $1,864,688 | ||
| Three-year total: $5,594,063 | Three-year present value: $4,637,202 | |||||
Evidence and data. Targeted welcome journeys, nuture programs, and dynamic content with Cheetah Digital by Marigold enabled interviewees’ organizations to deliver messages that left lasting and memorable impressions with prospects and new customers. As interviewees supplemented their direct mail efforts and in-app notifications with email marketing through Cheetah Digital by Marigold, they boosted redemption rates, grew subscriber lists, and increased new customer demand.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.8 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Subscribers to marketing messages before Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A1 | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 | |
| B2 | Subscriber growth rate with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | Interviews | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
| B3 | Increased subscribers with Cheetah Digital by Marigold (cumulative) | (B1+B3[PY])*B2+ B3[PY] | 300,000 | 630,000 | 993,000 | |
| B4 | Average number of marketing messages per subscriber (three per week) | A2 | 156 | 156 | 156 | |
| B5 | Volume of marketing messages to acquired subscribers | B3*B4 | 46,800,000 | 98,280,000 | 154,908,000 | |
| B6 | Click rate with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A6 | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | |
| B7 | Incremental traffic attributable to subscriber growth with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | B5*B6 | 936,000 | 1,965,600 | 3,098,160 | |
| B8 | Sales conversion rate | A8 | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| B9 | Incremental orders attributable to subscriber growth with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | B7*B8 | 234,000 | 491,400 | 774,540 | |
| B10 | Average order value | A10 | $125 | $125 | $125 | |
| B11 | Incremental revenue attributable to subscriber growth with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | B9*B10 | $29,250,000 | $61,425,000 | $96,817,500 | |
| B12 | Operating margin | A12 | 3% | 3% | 3% | |
| Bt | Increased customer acquisition | B11*B12 | $877,500 | $1,842,750 | $2,904,525 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Btr | Increased customer acquisition (risk-adjusted) | $745,875 | $1,566,338 | $2,468,846 | ||
| Three-year total: $4,781,059 | Three-year present value: $3,827,443 | |||||
Evidence and data. Cheetah Digital by Marigold helped organizations retain subscribers by reengaging inactive or unresponsive contacts, improving deliverability, and empowering customers with the choice to opt down rather than opt out of marketing messages.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $73,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Subscribers to marketing messages with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A1+B3 | 3,300,000 | 3,630,000 | 3,993,000 | |
| C2 | Baseline subscriber loss due to opt outs | Composite | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
| C3 | Baseline subscriber loss due to deliverability issues | Composite | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
| C4 | Improved retention due to improved deliverability with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| C5 | Marketing messages for retained subscribers (three per week) | C1*C3*C4*A2 | 1,595,880 | 1,755,468 | 1,931,015 | |
| C6 | Improved retention due to opt downs with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| C7 | Average marketing messages received per subscriber opting down (one per week) | C1*C2*C6*52 weeks | 72,072 | 79,279 | 87,207 | |
| C8 | Emails received with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | C5+C7 | 1,667,952 | 1,834,747 | 2,018,222 | |
| C9 | Click rate with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | A4 | 2% | 2% | 2% | |
| C10 | Sales conversion rate | A8 | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| C11 | Average order value | A10 | $125 | $125 | $125 | |
| C12 | Sales from improved retention with Cheetah Digital by Marigold | C8*C9*C10*C11 | $1,042,470 | $1,146,717 | $1,261,389 | |
| C13 | Operating margin | A12 | 3% | 3% | 3% | |
| Ct | Improved subscriber retention | C12*C13 | $31,274 | $34,402 | $37,842 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Ctr | Improved subscriber retention (risk-adjusted) | $26,583 | $29,242 | $32,166 | ||
| Three-year total: $87,990 | Three-year present value: $72,500 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that Cheetah Digital by Marigold enabled their organization’s marketing teams to execute campaigns more efficiently and improve results compared to the prior environment.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.1 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Content strategists, writers, editors, and designers involved in campaign creation and execution | Composite | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| D2 | Fully burdened annual salary for an employee involved in campaign creation and execution | Composite | $105,000 | $105,000 | $105,000 | |
| D3 | Labor efficiencies gained | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Dt | Avoided hires from campaign labor efficiencies | D1*D2*D3 | $525,000 | $525,000 | $525,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Dtr | Avoided hires from campaign labor efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $446,250 | $446,250 | $446,250 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,338,750 | Three-year present value: $1,109,758 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees mentioned decommissioning previous point solutions and reducing professional services hours after switching to Cheetah Digital by Marigold. In doing so, interviewees saved prior solution licensing costs and benefited from greater time efficiencies.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $732,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Retired solutions or third-party services | Interviews | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| E2 | Average cost per solution | Interviews | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | |
| E3 | Rate of retiring solutions | Interviews | 50% | 100% | 100% | |
| Et | Maximized savings from retired solutions | E1*E2*E3 | $200,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Etr | Maximized savings from retired solutions (risk-adjusted) | $180,000 | $360,000 | $360,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $900,000 | Three-year present value: $731,630 | |||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Cheetah Digital by Marigold and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | Licensing and services | $82,500 | $531,300 | $531,300 | $531,300 | $1,676,400 | $1,403,764 |
| Gtr | Implementation and ongoing management | $672,750 | $241,500 | $241,500 | $241,500 | $1,397,250 | $1,273,325 |
| Htr | Onboarding and ongoing training | $4,070 | $15,840 | $9,240 | $9,240 | $38,390 | $33,049 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $759,320 | $788,640 | $782,040 | $782,040 | $3,112,040 | $2,710,138 | |
Evidence and data. Interviewees described Marigold’s costs as straightforward and predictable for departmental budgeting. Costs varied across organizations depending on email and SMS volume. Contact Marigold for pricing.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.4 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Licensing costs | Composite | $75,000 | $413,000 | $413,000 | $413,000 | |
| F2 | Professional services retainer | Composite | $70,000 | $70,000 | $70,000 | ||
| Ft | Licensing and services | F1+F2 | $75,000 | $483,000 | $483,000 | $483,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
| Ftr | Licensing and services (risk-adjusted) | $82,500 | $531,300 | $531,300 | $531,300 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,676,400 | Three-year present value: $1,403,764 | ||||||
Evidence and data. Resourcing from Cheetah Digital by Marigold varied across interviewees’ organizations depending on marketing channels, campaign complexity, and message volume. They migrated data, journeys, and triggers to Cheetah Digital by Marigold and leveraged Marigold-provided services along with in-house resources.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.3 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Cross-functional stakeholders involved in implementation | Composite | 6 | ||||
| G2 | Fully burdened annual salary for a cross-functional stakeholder | Composite | $130,000 | ||||
| G3 | Percentage of time dedicated to new process implementation and change management | Composite | 25% | ||||
| G4 | Percentage of time spent assisting migration, including data transfer, data cleaning, journeys, and triggers | Interviews | 50% | ||||
| G5 | Email marketing manager FTEs involved in ongoing management | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| G6 | Fully burdened annual salary for an email marketing manager | Composite | $105,000 | $105,000 | $105,000 | $105,000 | |
| Gt | Implementation and ongoing management | G1*G2*(G3+G4)+G 5*G6 | $585,000 | $210,000 | $210,000 | $210,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑15% | ||||||
| Gtr | Implementation and ongoing management (risk-adjusted) | $672,750 | $241,500 | $241,500 | $241,500 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,397,250 | Three-year present value: $1,273,325 | ||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees described a reasonable learning curve for Cheetah Digital by Marigold and thorough training support from Marigold. The vice president of digital operations in the direct marketing industry said: “We’ve got a team of people on the execution front who are in the Cheetah Digital by Marigold tool all the time. It was really a partnership in which Marigold basically taught my team what they had to do and how they had to do it and gave them suggestions on upstream workflow changes that we needed to put in place in order to make this happen.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary based on the following variables.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $33,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | FTEs involved in Marigold’s client services, campaign, and creative teams | Interviews | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| H2 | Hours meeting with Marigold | Interviews | 16 | 24 | 24 | 24 | |
| H3 | Marketing team members | Composite | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| H4 | Onboarding and ongoing training hours per user | Interviews | 1 | 24 | 12 | 12 | |
| H5 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a marketer | G6/2080 | $50 | $50 | $50 | $50 | |
| Ht | Onboarding and ongoing training | (H1*H2+H3*H4)*H 5 | $3,700 | $14,400 | $8,400 | $8,400 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
| Htr | Onboarding and ongoing training (risk-adjusted) | $4,070 | $15,840 | $9,240 | $9,240 | ||
| Three-year total: $38,390 | Three-year present value: $33,049 | ||||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($759,320) | ($788,640) | ($782,040) | ($782,040) | ($3,112,040) | ($2,710,138) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $3,263,395 | $4,266,517 | $5,171,949 | $12,701,862 | $10,378,533 |
| Net benefits | ($759,320) | $2,474,755 | $3,484,477 | $4,389,909 | $9,589,822 | $7,668,395 |
| ROI | 283% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html