Executive Summary
Retail and hospitality organizations are operating in an increasingly constrained labor environment, marked by persistent staffing shortages, rising labor costs, and growing employee demand for flexibility. Traditional workforce management approaches struggle to keep pace with volatile demand patterns, leading to inefficiencies such as overstaffing, understaffing, and inconsistent service delivery. As a result, workforce management is emerging as a strategic priority, requiring more dynamic, data-driven approaches to align labor with real-time business demand while supporting employee experience. Retailers require intelligent, AI-enabled platforms that allow more adaptive scheduling, improved forecasting, and greater workforce flexibility in high-volume, customer-facing environments.
Legion Workforce Management is an AI‑native platform that unifies labor forecasting, scheduling, time and attendance, and employee engagement in a single system. Legion addresses key operational challenges that employers with large hourly workforces face, including inaccurate demand forecasting, inefficient manual scheduling, and compliance risks. Legion uses data‑driven forecasting and automated schedule optimization to align staffing with business demand and constraints. The platform automates administrative tasks for managers and enables employee self-service and schedule flexibility, which can support productivity and retention in frontline environments.
Legion commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Legion Workforce Management.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Legion Workforce Management on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Legion Workforce Management. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a retail organization with 15,000 employees, 85% of whom are hourly workers.
Interviewees said that prior to using Legion Workforce Management, their organizations struggled with outdated, legacy approaches to labor scheduling, timekeeping, and workforce forecasting and planning. These environments relied on manual processes, disconnected systems, and limited forecasting capabilities, which made it difficult to align staffing with demand and enforce compliance requirements. These limitations led to inefficient scheduling practices (including overstaffing, understaffing, and high attrition), administrative burden for managers, inconsistent service levels, and increased exposure to labor law penalties.
After the investment in Legion Workforce Management, the interviewees described a more integrated, data-driven operating model, with AI-driven automated forecasting, an intuitive single mobile app for employees, optimized schedule generation, and improved visibility into labor performance. Managers spend less time on manual scheduling and administrative tasks, while employees benefit from greater schedule transparency and flexibility. Key results from the investment include improved labor alignment, reduced excess hours, lower overtime and compliance-related costs, improved employee retention, and enhanced manager productivity driven by automation and streamlined workforce processes.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
-
Scheduling optimization worth $21.1 million. The composite organization uses improved, data-driven demand forecasting to align labor schedules more closely with actual business demand, reducing volatility and improving staffing accuracy. More accurate forecasts enable automated schedule generation that requires fewer manual adjustments, lowering the time managers spend creating and maintaining schedules. Improved alignment between labor supply and demand reduces overstaffing and understaffing, helping control labor costs while maintaining adequate coverage. Greater adherence to labor budgets and reduced variance in scheduled hours improve financial predictability and operational efficiency across locations.
-
Savings of $11.0 million from a reduction in employee turnover. The composite organization improves employee experience through greater schedule flexibility and transparency and mobile access to earned wages, which increases engagement and satisfaction among frontline workers. Enhanced visibility into schedules and the ability for employees to manage availability, swaps, and time-off requests improve work-life balance and reduce friction in day-to-day operations. These improvements drive stronger schedule adherence and reliability, contributing to fewer absences and more consistent workforce performance. As employee engagement increases, the organization experiences lower voluntary turnover, reducing hiring and onboarding costs while maintaining a more stable and experienced workforce.
-
Reduction of $1.6 million in overtime pay. The composite organization uses improved demand forecasting, optimized scheduling, and enhanced visibility into labor performance to better align staffing levels with business needs. These capabilities enable more proactive labor planning and reduce reliance on last‑minute schedule adjustments that drive overtime use. Managers gain clearer insight into overtime trends and thresholds, allowing them to manage labor more effectively within defined limits. As a result, the organization reduces excess overtime hours while maintaining appropriate coverage, leading to improved payroll control and more efficient labor spend.
-
Manager productivity improvements of $9.1 million. The composite organization reduces the administrative burden on store managers through automated scheduling, streamlined payroll processes, and improved system usability. Managers spend significantly less time creating and adjusting schedules and resolving payroll issues, enabling them to focus more on customer-facing and operational activities. Simplified workflows and integrated systems reduce manual interventions and errors, improving consistency and control across locations. As a result, the organization increases manager productivity and reallocates time toward higher-value activities that support store performance and employee engagement.
-
Avoided $7.8 million in labor compliance penalties and legal exposure. The composite organization automates compliance with complex labor regulations that vary by region. Through built-in rules, digital attestations, and real-time monitoring of scheduling and timekeeping practices, these capabilities improve visibility into compliance drivers and ensure that schedules adhere to local legal requirements, reducing the need for manual tracking and interpretation. Automated calculation and documentation of premiums and schedule changes reduce errors and ensure consistent policy enforcement. As a result, the organization reduces the frequency and cost of compliance violations, strengthens its overall compliance posture, and reduces legal risk.
-
Payroll and workforce administration labor savings of $220,000. The composite organization streamlines payroll and workforce administration through automation, system integration, and reduced reliance on manual processes. Routine tasks such as budget uploads, user management, and payroll adjustments require less time and effort, improving operational efficiency. Enhanced data synchronization and system usability reduce errors and administrative overhead across teams. As a result, the organization lowers the labor required for workforce administration activities while enabling support functions to operate more efficiently at scale.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Improved attendance and shift fulfillment support higher revenue through more consistent store coverage and team-based selling. The composite organization experiences a reduction in absenteeism (up to 19% year over year), driven by employees’ ability to swap and fill shifts proactively. This improves schedule adherence and ensures adequate staffing during peak periods. With more consistent coverage, store teams are better positioned to execute team-selling models, which improves conversion rates. By reducing missed shifts and maintaining optimal staffing levels, Legion helps the organization avoid lost sales opportunities associated with understaffed floors and suboptimal customer interactions.
-
AI-driven automation improves efficiency and decision-making. The composite organization automates workforce management processes using AI-driven forecasting and scheduling, reducing manual effort and improving consistency. Automated schedule generation incorporates employee preferences, skills, demand signals, workforce constraints, and business rules, minimizing the need for manager intervention. This enables faster, more accurate decisions while simplifying workflows, increasing productivity, and allowing managers to focus on higher-value activities.
-
A modern user interface improves usability and adoption. The composite organization benefits from a modern, intuitive user interface that simplifies workforce management tasks for managers and frontline employees. Its ease of use reduces training requirements and accelerates adoption across the workforce, increasing overall engagement with the system. Mobile accessibility enables employees to interact with schedules and timekeeping tools more easily, improving day-to-day efficiency. As a result, the organization experiences higher system utilization, smoother operational workflows, and improved user satisfaction across the workforce.
-
Centralized workforce data improves visibility into scheduling, performance, and labor allocation. The composite organization gains enhanced visibility into workforce data, enabling the analysis of employee behaviors, scheduling patterns, and performance trends. Centralized data and advanced analytics tools allow leaders to identify patterns that impact productivity, attendance, and overall operational effectiveness. These insights support more informed staffing decisions, improved labor allocation, and the ability to identify characteristics of high-performing employees. As a result, the organization strengthens workforce planning and continuously improves operational outcomes through data-driven decision-making.
-
Accelerated deployment reduces time to value. The composite organization benefits from faster implementation timelines that enable the rapid rollout of the solution across locations. Streamlined deployment processes reduce disruption to operations and allow teams to begin using the system more quickly. Early user adoption and strong organizational alignment support a smoother transition from legacy systems. As a result, the organization accelerates realization of operational improvements and begins capturing value sooner from its workforce management investment.
-
Legion InstantPay results in talent attraction and engagement. The composite organization enhances its ability to attract and retain frontline workers by offering greater financial flexibility through earned wage access capabilities. This improves the overall employee value proposition and differentiates the organization in competitive labor markets. Increased flexibility supports employee satisfaction and engagement, particularly among hourly workers with varying financial needs. As a result, the organization strengthens its recruiting effectiveness, improves its workforce stability, and reinforces its positioning as an employer of choice.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
-
Fees to Legion. Organizations incur a yearly license fee based on the size and scope of the project. The composite organization pays a three-year PV of $3.2 million for its Legion usage.
-
Implementation, training, and ongoing management. Members of the operations and IT teams are involved in Legion platform deployment and ongoing management. The composite organization facilitates an initial manager training session, and the managers themselves conduct minimal ad hoc training sessions. For the composite organization, costs associated with the implementation, training, and ongoing management of the Legion platform total $346,000 over three years.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $50.8 million over three years versus costs of $3.5 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $47.3 million and an ROI of 1340%.
96%
Forecasting accuracy after Legion
Key Statistics
1340%
Return on investment (ROI)
$50.8M
Benefits PV
$47.3M
Net present value (NPV)
<6 months
Payback
Benefits (Three-Year)
The Legion Workforce Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the investment
Interviews
| Role | Industry | Region | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senior data analyst | Retail | US | 100,000+ |
| Senior director of workforce management | Retail | US | 190,000+ |
| Divisional Vice President of retail innovation and operations | Retail | US | 1,600+ |
| People technology and product leader | Hospitality | US | 6,500 |
Key Challenges
Before investing in Legion, interviewees described their organizations as relying on manual processes and aging systems for labor scheduling and timekeeping. Many lacked integrated tools or advanced forecasting capabilities and used multiple disjointed applications or even paper methods to create schedules. This patchwork of legacy workforce management approaches created inefficiencies and complexity. Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
-
Inefficient and time-consuming scheduling processes. Managers had to spend significant time each week manually creating and adjusting employee schedules. The senior data analyst in the retail industry recalled: “Store managers were spending 6 to 8 hours per week micromanaging both the current week and the future schedule. They spent a lot of time in the back room instead of serving customers and were not very productive.” These manual workflows consumed valuable managerial time that could have been spent on higher-value, customer-facing activities.
-
Poor labor forecasting accuracy led to staffing misalignment. Older scheduling systems generated erratic or impractical staffing plans and lacked reliable demand forecasting. The senior data analyst in the retail industry explained that their legacy tool would “call for … five people in footwear, then jump up to 10 people, then go down to two people, all within an hour. We are not Uber; we can’t bring people in to work 15 minutes at a time.” This volatile, unrealistic allocation forced managers to overschedule or constantly reassign shifts to smooth coverage, resulting in productivity losses and frequent payroll overspending to ensure adequate staffing.
-
Limited compliance support and high labor law risks. Without modern compliance features, organizations struggled to meet strict scheduling and work-hour regulations, risking penalties. The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry described how their prior system tracked when schedules changed, but not why, noting, “We had to pay the penalty because we had no reason to say why we wouldn’t every time a shift was altered.” Other interviewees cited difficulties complying with fair workweek and meal break rules, noting that compliance gaps exposed their businesses to costly fines or lawsuits. The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry mentioned, “We had issues proving that there was proper overlapping coverage to be compliant with the requirements out there, which cost us millions of dollars in California.”
-
Fragmented systems with limited visibility into workforce data. Many interviewees described using multiple disconnected tools for scheduling, time and attendance, and forecasting, resulting in disjointed processes and siloed information. For example, the DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry described a critical scheduling task, California labor law attestation for shifts, as “very cumbersome” since they had to manage it on paper with their old system. This fragmentation prevented teams from establishing a unified view of labor operations and performance as they had to collect data manually or could not capture it across systems. Teams lacked integrated reporting and struggled to derive insights from their workforce data, hindering staffing optimization and proactive issue identification.
-
A poor employee scheduling experience and low engagement. Before the new solution, frontline employees had limited visibility into and control over their schedules. Without an employee-facing scheduling app, workers often had to contact managers or call the store to find out or adjust their shifts — essentially “playing the telephone game,” as one retail executive said. This cumbersome process frustrated employees, undermined work-life balance, and slowed down shift swaps or time-off requests. Staff couldn’t easily view their timesheets or submit availability/preferences digitally, resulting in a subpar experience and little empowerment.
-
Rigid, costly legacy systems that hampered agility. Older workforce management solutions often required extensive effort or outside support for routine updates. The senior data analyst in the retail industry said their previous system was so inflexible, “it was like an act of Congress to get even something minor to happen. You were either paying out the nose for a statement of work, or you were contacting someone within that cottage industry that had [legacy tool] knowledge, and they built us customized tools.” In another case, simply uploading weekly labor budgets into the legacy scheduling system was “a four-hour process.” Interviewees said that these burdensome tools made it slow and costly to adapt workforce processes to new requirements, further compounding the operational challenges.
Solution Requirements
The interviewees searched for a solution that could:
-
Automate labor law compliance and minimize risk. The new platform needed to enforce evolving workforce regulations automatically (e.g., fair workweek scheduling laws) and digitize compliance steps to reduce manual effort and penalties.
-
Provide an employee-facing mobile app for scheduling. Interviewees prioritized a mobile self-service experience to empower frontline staff to view and manage their schedules.
-
Integrate with core systems and unify workforce data. Interviewees looked for seamless integration with HR and payroll, as well as a single platform that combined scheduling with time and attendance. They needed to replace multiple disjointed legacy tools with an integrated workforce management environment to improve data consistency and visibility.
-
Automatically generate optimized schedules via better forecasting. A top requirement was to automate strong demand forecasting to create reliable, demand-based schedules with minimal manual edits.
-
Offer a modern user interface and actionable analytics. Interviewees sought a clean, intuitive UI to boost adoption and efficiency, along with built-in analytics and reporting to improve labor insights.
Composite Organization
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
-
Description of composite. The composite organization is a North American–based specialty retailer with approximately 15,000 employees and a store network of 700 locations. Prior to investing in Legion, the organization relied on fragmented workforce management processes that resulted in inconsistent scheduling, high administrative burden for store managers, and limited visibility into labor performance. Store-level employee turnover exceeded 85%, and labor represented the organization’s largest controllable expense. These challenges constrained operational efficiency and limited the organization’s ability to optimize staffing to demand.
-
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using the solution in Year 1 following a three-month implementation period. Although the composite implements Legion across its entire workforce in Year 1, only 75% adopt it. However, workforce adoption reaches 100% by Year 2.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
-
15,000 employees
-
85% of employees are hourly workers
-
700 locations
-
85% employee turnover yearly
-
Retail organization
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Scheduling optimization | $6,444,360 | $9,666,540 | $9,666,540 | $25,777,440 | $21,110,000 |
| Btr | Savings from a reduction in employee turnover | $3,651,804 | $4,869,072 | $4,869,072 | $13,389,948 | $11,002,054 |
| Ctr | Reduction in overtime pay | $542,506 | $723,341 | $723,341 | $1,989,187 | $1,634,446 |
| Dtr | Manager productivity improvements | $3,009,825 | $4,013,100 | $4,013,100 | $11,036,025 | $9,067,918 |
| Etr | Avoided labor compliance penalties and legal exposure | $2,579,850 | $3,439,800 | $3,439,800 | $9,459,450 | $7,772,501 |
| Ftr | Payroll and workforce administration labor savings | $73,017 | $97,356 | $97,356 | $267,728 | $219,983 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $16,301,362 | $22,809,209 | $22,809,209 | $61,919,779 | $50,806,902 |
Scheduling Optimization
Evidence and data. Before investing in Legion, interviewees described their forecasting processes as lacking intelligence and often producing misaligned schedules. After investing in Legion, interviewees used more accurate, data‑driven demand forecasts to better align labor schedules with actual business needs. By reducing staffing volatility and giving managers greater confidence in system‑generated schedules, they improved labor utilization while spending less time manually adjusting schedules.
After investing in Legion’s AI-driven forecasting, the senior director of workforce management in the retail industry reported that, “Legion’s forecast [accounted for] local and macro events [and achieved a] 300-point base increase in MAPE (forecast accuracy).” This improved accuracy let managers better optimize staffing levels, reducing overtime hours by 20% versus pre-adoption trends, and operations leadership commented that they had never been able to measure labor better.
-
The senior data analyst in the retail industry said: “Our primary objective was to simplify coverage as much as possible. We sought a tool that provides robust demand and labor forecasting, eliminating volatile scheduling spikes. Instead, we aimed for a smooth curve that aligns with our sales patterns, helping to clarify staffing needs and shift overlaps. This approach garnered significant support from our store leadership team, and we’ve found that it now takes us only 2 to 3 hours per week to create and manage schedules.” In addition, this interviewee noted that actual labor usage stayed within 0.2% of budgeted hours versus a 1% to 2% variance before implementing Legion.
-
The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry noted that store managers spent an average of 47 minutes each week building schedules before Legion. After adoption, this dropped to 16 minutes — a nearly 66% reduction in scheduling time. He said: “Our managers are more present on their sales floor, interacting with customers and providing coaching, training, and feedback to associates versus being holed up in an office trying to complete a complicated Sudoku puzzle that is the schedule.”
-
The people technology and product leader in the hospitality industry discussed how forecasting and scheduling were previously manual and simplistic. “In our restaurants, understanding how long a task takes is an important driver in turning a good labor model into a great one. Legion helps us understand the inventory of tasks and the time required to complete them. Then, based on the rate of the ask times, the multiplier is applied, and it figures out whether we need another person or a subset of 5 hours. The task management approach to labor modeling is modern, especially in today’s restaurant industry. Prior to that, you just had time and motion studies and did step table assumptions; Legion has taken that a step further within the industry.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite employs 15,000 total employees.
-
Approximately 12,750 employees (about 85%) are hourly, frontline workers whose schedules are directly impacted by forecasting accuracy.
-
Hourly employees work an average of 15 hours per week.
-
The average fully burdened hourly rate for an employee is $16.
-
Before Legion, the composite’s labor forecasts were 87% accurate, reflecting interviewee descriptions of legacy tools that produced volatile demand curves, frequent overrides, and regular overstaffing or understaffing.
-
After deploying Legion, forecast accuracy improves to 96% by Year 2 due to smoother demand curves, tighter alignment to workloads, and reduced variance to labor budgets.
-
The composite experiences an 8 to 9 percent increase in accuracy.
-
Forrester assumes 75% of the forecast improvement translates into reduced overstaffing, recognizing that organizations still maintain some intentional buffer for flexibility and service levels.
-
Applying this portion of improved accuracy to the hourly labor base results in a 6% to 7% reduction in scheduled labor hours.
Risks. The results may vary depending on:
-
The size and type of business, which drives the total number of hourly employees.
-
The hourly rate for employees.
-
The degree to which Legion is deployed across an enterprise.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $21.1 million.
9%
Improvement in forecast accuracy by Year 2
Scheduling Optimization
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Total employees | Composite | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 | |
| A2 | Hourly employees | Composite | 12,750 | 12,750 | 12,750 | |
| A3 | Employee hours per week | Composite | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| A4 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for an employee | Composite | $16 | $16 | $16 | |
| A5 | Subtotal: Labor costs for hourly employees | A2*A3*A4*52 weeks | $159,120,000 | $159,120,000 | $159,120,000 | |
| A6 | Forecasting accuracy before Legion | Interviews | 87% | 87% | 87% | |
| A7 | Forecasting accuracy after Legion | Interviews | 95% | 96% | 96% | |
| A8 | Improvements in forecasting accuracy with Legion | A7-A6 | 8% | 9% | 9% | |
| A9 | Percentage of forecasting improvement compensating for overstaffing | Composite | 75% | 75% | 75% | |
| A10 | Forecasting improvement compensating for overstaffing with Legion | A8*A9 | 8% | 9% | 9% | |
| A11 | Adoption percentage | Interviews | 75% | 100% | 100% | |
| At | Scheduling optimization | (A8*A5)*A9*A10 | $7,160,400 | $10,740,600 | $10,740,600 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Scheduling optimization (risk-adjusted) | $6,444,360 | $9,666,540 | $9,666,540 | ||
| Three-year total: $25,777,440 | Three-year present value: $21,110,000 | |||||
Savings From A Reduction In Employee Turnover
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that improved employee experience, schedule flexibility, and visibility into work schedules positively influenced employee engagement and attendance behaviors. Improved employee engagement — driven by greater schedule flexibility, transparency, and control — serves as a leading indicator of reduced voluntary turnover, as employees are more satisfied, more reliable, and more likely to remain with an organization.2
Before implementing Legion, employees lacked visibility into schedules and had limited control over their work-life balance, which contributed to frustration and disengagement.
-
The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry noted: “I can’t say enough about the efficiencies the mobile app created. To get their schedules, employees [used to have] to call stores and play the telephone game. Now, we have a mobile app that lets employees view their schedules in real time. This helps with work-life balance and manager communication and provides better scheduling because they can input their availability and time off, swap shifts, and pick up open shifts. Employees love seeing their schedule and syncing it to their calendar. It’s a net positive experience for sure.”
In addition, adopting features such as Legion InstantPay improved employee satisfaction and contributed to high Net Promoter Scores.3
-
The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry observed measurable behavioral improvements tied to engagement, including increased adherence to schedules: “Employees enrolled in the Legion InstantPay program call off less and arrive on time more often. When an employee follows the schedule, they can access their shift. If they’ve deviated, the store manager must approve that shift for payment — so it’s a carrot for the employee to show up when they should to get paid. We’ve seen a 10% lift in schedule adherence.”
Legion also improved transparency and trust in timekeeping and payroll processes. Employees gained visibility into their timesheets and edits, reducing disputes and strengthening confidence in the system. These improvements demonstrate how Legion enhanced the employee experience and reliability, which interviewees’ organizations associated with reduced voluntary attrition over time.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite employs 12,750 hourly employees.
-
The composite’s retail stores experience an 85% turnover rate before Legion.
-
After deploying Legion, the retail stores experience a 10% reduction in turnover directly attributed to the platform.
-
The average cost of replacing an employee is 15% of their annual salary.
-
Seventy-five percent of hourly employees adopt the Legion solution in Year 1, which climbs to 100% by Year 2.
Risks. The savings from a reduction in employee turnover vary depending on the following:
-
The turnover rate and other factors driving turnover at an organization.
-
The hourly rate for an employee.
-
The average cost of recruiting and training an employee.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10% yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $11.0 million.
10%
Reduction in employee turnover directly attributable to Legion
Savings From A Reduction In Employee Turnover
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Hourly employees | A2 | 12,750 | 12,750 | 12,750 | |
| B2 | Employee turnover rate before Legion | Interviews | 85% | 85% | 85% | |
| B3 | Reduction in employee turnover rate attributable to Legion | Interviews | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
| B4 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee (as an annual salary) | A4*40 hours*52 weeks | $33,280 | $33,280 | $33,280 | |
| B5 | Average cost of replacing an employee | B4*15% | $4,992 | $4,992 | $4,992 | |
| B6 | Adoption percentage | Interviews | 75% | 100% | 100% | |
| Bt | Savings from a reduction in employee turnover | B1*B2*B3*B5*B6 | $4,057,560 | $5,410,080 | $5,410,080 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Btr | Savings from a reduction in employee turnover (risk-adjusted) | $3,651,804 | $4,869,072 | $4,869,072 | ||
| Three-year total: $13,389,948 | Three-year present value: $11,002,054 | |||||
Reduction In Overtime Pay
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that improved forecasting accuracy, proactive scheduling capabilities, and enhanced visibility into labor performance reduced their reliance on overtime. Improved labor alignment, driven by more accurate demand forecasts, real-time scheduling insights, and better managerial control, serves as a leading indicator of reduced overtime costs and improved store performance, as organizations can staff appropriately, avoid last-minute adjustments, and maintain tighter control over payroll spend.4
Before implementing Legion, organizations lacked tools to manage labor allocation proactively and optimize schedules in real time, limiting their ability to control overtime. The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry explained, “In the prior system, we could not react or be proactive in scheduling behaviors.”
After implementing Legion, interviewees’ organizations gained improved visibility into labor demand and stronger tools to align staffing with business needs, enabling more proactive scheduling and tighter labor control.
-
The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry noted: “We’ve used Legion to manage better and be proactive at scheduling in stores. … We have seen a reduction in overtime.”
-
The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry said: “Between 2024 and 2025, we did have a 16% reduction in overtime hours, which was a focus for us. The biggest thing was visibility into overtime and the ability to flag it directly in the UI and in other reporting we had created. We also give Legion’s schedule generation tool credit because it does a great job of basing the schedule in a way where the store has coverage while avoiding overtime when possible.”
These improvements resulted in measurable reductions in overtime usage, with one interviewee reporting a significant decline compared to prior trends.
-
The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry quantified the impact: “In our prior system, we could not be proactive in scheduling behaviors. Legion has a schedule score that measures how well the published schedule aligns with the workload. If you’re at 100%, it means you have the right number of people in the right roles. Fifty percent says you’re not staffed correctly. We’ve used Legion to better manage and be proactive about scheduling in stores, and the manager reviews and ensures we’re in balance. Operations managers say we’ve never measured labor more effectively than we do today, and we have seen a reduction in overtime. We are down 20% from pre-COVID trends. We run lean on overtime, surprisingly now closer to 1.5% or 1.6%.” In addition, improved labor visibility and scheduling performance enabled stronger overall payroll control.
-
The senior data analyst in the retail industry said: “We invest about a billion [dollars] per year in store payroll, and we were within 0.2%. [We have] tremendous management by our field teams, but I feel very strongly that our tools have set those leaders up for success. There are very clear expectations. The system always generates a schedule that’s within their budget. It’s optimized for demand. It’s optimized for the budget.”
Together, these improvements demonstrate how Legion enhances labor planning precision and operational control, allowing organizations to reduce unnecessary overtime hours and better align labor spend with demand.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite organization saw an average of 3 hours of overtime pay, or 20% of average weekly pay, per location per week before Legion.
-
After Legion, the composite organization sees an average of 0.24 hours of overtime pay, or 1.6% of average weekly pay, per location per week.
-
Overtime pay for hourly employees is 1.5 times their regular pay.
-
The composite has 700 retail locations.
Risks. The reduction in overtime pay may vary depending on the following:
-
The number of retail locations within an organization.
-
The number of overtime pay hours per location.
-
The overtime pay rate at an organization.
-
The speed of Legion adoption into an organization.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million.
18.4%
Reduction in overtime pay
Reduction In Overtime Pay
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Overtime hours paid per week per location before Legion | A3*20% | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| C2 | Overtime hours paid per week per location after Legion | A3*1.6% | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |
| C3 | Overtime pay for hourly employees | (A4*1.5)-A4 | $8 | $8 | $8 | |
| C4 | Locations | Composite | 700 | 700 | 700 | |
| C5 | Adoption percentage | Composite | 75% | 100% | 100% | |
| Ct | Reduction in overtime pay | (C1-C2)*C3*C4*C5*52 weeks | $602,784 | $803,712 | $803,712 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Reduction in overtime pay (risk-adjusted) | $542,506 | $723,341 | $723,341 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,989,187 | Three-year present value: $1,634,446 | |||||
Manager Productivity Improvements
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that improved scheduling automation, streamlined payroll administration, and reduced administrative burden enabled meaningful gains in manager productivity. Increased efficiency, driven by automated schedule generation, simplified payroll processes, and enhanced system usability, allowed managers to spend less time on administrative tasks and more time on value-added activities such as customer service, coaching, and operational execution.
Before implementing Legion, managers spent significant time manually creating schedules, handling payroll-related administrative tasks, and navigating inefficient processes, limiting their ability to focus on in-store operations.
-
The people technology and product leader in the hospitality industry explained: “When we think about our managers today, we try to analyze it by hard savings and some soft savings. Managers were spending around 7 hours a week on schedule creation and maintenance. With Legion, we were able to reduce this to about 3.5 hours. We saw about a 50% reduction in time to schedule.”
-
The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry described payroll-related inefficiencies, saying, “Managers would close out payroll for the week … and then they’d have to call the payroll department, be on hold, and communicate changes.”
After implementing Legion, managers benefited from automated scheduling and more efficient payroll administration processes, significantly reducing the time required to complete scheduling and payroll-related activities.
-
Regarding payroll administration improvements, the senior director of workforce management in the retail industry stated: “Now it can happen in the system. … The manager can go in and make edits — there is good control and record keeping. … Before Legion, we had around 1,000 retro edits a week. … Now it is a small fraction of that.”
-
The same interviewee highlighted the broader impact on daily work: “The biggest win [for managers] is less time being in the office. Retail is won or lost on the shop floor. It’s being out there where they can do things tangibly and be productive — stocking, merchandising, customer service, coaching, and training employees.”
Together, these improvements demonstrate that Legion reduces the administrative burden on store-level managers across scheduling and payroll, enabling them to reallocate time to higher-value business activities.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite organization has 700 retail locations.
-
Each location has one unit manager responsible for scheduling, 75% of whom adopt the Legion platform in Year 1, with 100% adoption in Years 2 and 3.
-
Each manager saves 7 hours per week on scheduling tasks with the Legion platform.
-
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a store manager is $35.5
-
Forrester conservatively estimates that 50% of the total time saved per manager is applied directly back to value-generating tasks, and it is therefore included in the benefit calculation. Individual managers may apply additional time savings toward professional development, training, and work-life activities, which were not included in the benefit analysis.
Risks. Manager productivity improvements may vary depending on the following:
-
The number of retail locations within an organization.
-
The number of unit managers responsible for scheduling within an organization and their productivity rates.
-
The fully burdened hourly rate for a store manager.
-
The speed of Legion adoption into an organization.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $9.1 million.
Interview Spotlight
Time Savings From Seamless Scheduling Features
The senior data analyst at a retail organization described several benefits their organization experienced with Legion’s scheduling features, including increased claim rates for open shifts among employees, time savings from seamless shift changes, more employee accountability and ownership in the scheduling process, and time saved among managers and administrators. They shared:
“This [scheduling] functionality is beneficial for store managers and frontline employees. [Employees] can offer shifts to each other, or they can claim open shifts put out by store leaders, so there’s flexibility for the team to pick up available work. And I’ve got some statistics that back this up. In 2023, which was a little less than half a year ago, we had roughly $15,000 in open shifts. That increased to $40,000 in 2024 and remained around that level in 2025. Our claim rate increased from 34% in 2023 to 42% in 2024 and 58% in 2025.
“If an employee can’t work a shift anymore, they don’t have to call the store and hope a manager can step off the floor, or send a text or email, or leave a handwritten note. Instead, they can take ownership of finding someone to cover the shift. Managers can then view claim offers on their mobile devices and approve or deny them while staying on the floor. It gives employees more responsibility, makes them a bigger part of the scheduling process, and takes some of the burden off store managers.
“We estimated about 5 minutes saved each time. In 2025, that translated to about 1,900 hours of manager and administrative time saved. That’s meaningful for managers, but it’s also important for the employee experience because when somebody calls off, there’s a better chance another worker can step in and fill that shift.”
7 hours
Time saved per week per manager
Manager Productivity Improvements
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Locations | Composite | 700 | 700 | 700 | |
| D2 | Unit managers per location responsible for scheduling and payroll | Composite | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| D3 | Managers involved with scheduling and payroll | D1*D2 | 700 | 700 | 700 | |
| D4 | Time spent on scheduling and payroll before Legion (hours) | Interviews | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| D5 | Percentage reduction in scheduling time and payroll administration attributable to Legion | Interviews | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| D6 | Time saved per week per manager (hours) | D4*D5 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | |
| D7 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a store manager | Research data | $35 | $35 | $35 | |
| D8 | Adoption percentage | Interviews | 75% | 100% | 100% | |
| D9 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Dt | Manager productivity improvements | D3*D6*D7*D8*D9*52 weeks | $3,344,250 | $4,459,000 | $4,459,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | Manager productivity improvements (risk-adjusted) | $3,009,825 | $4,013,100 | $4,013,100 | ||
| Three-year total: $11,036,025 | Three-year present value: $9,067,918 | |||||
Avoided Labor Compliance Penalties And Legal Exposure
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that improved compliance automation, real-time monitoring, and built-in regulatory controls reduced exposure to labor-related penalties and legal risk. Improved compliance, driven by automated labor law enforcement, digital attestations, and real-time schedule and timekeeping validation, allowed interviewees to avoid financial penalties and reduce legal exposure by ensuring adherence to complex, evolving regulations.
Before implementing Legion, interviewees’ organizations lacked visibility into the drivers of labor compliance issues and had limited ability to enforce compliance consistently, resulting in unnecessary penalties and legal risk.
-
The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry explained: “In [our previous system], we knew when schedules changed but not why. Schedules changed due to employee-initiated changes, but we couldn’t collect the reasons. We had to assume we would pay the penalty for schedule deviations because we couldn’t provide a reason not to. Legion dynamically assesses why it changed, and employees had to attest to it. We saw a dramatic change — 90% of schedule changes are employee-initiated.”
After implementing Legion, their organizations gained the ability to track, justify, and automatically enforce compliance rules, significantly reducing unnecessary payouts and mitigating legal risk.
-
The senior director of workforce management further described broader compliance improvements: “They can dynamically assess the penalties versus the hours that employees may have worked. … They have helped us stay very compliant, which was a major issue that cost us millions of dollars previously.”
In addition, interviewees discussed eliminating exposure to noncompliance fines under labor laws, such as meal and rest break requirements. The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry gave two examples of how Legion enhances compliance visibility, automates labor law enforcement, and reduces both direct penalty costs and broader legal exposure.
-
The interviewee said: “In California, there are strict rules around meal and rest breaks at different points in a shift. There’s a lot of nuance, but at clock out, employees may choose to skip certain breaks voluntarily. Legion prompts them to attest whether they skipped a required break and, if so, whether that was at the employer’s request or their own choice. If we failed to provide the opportunity or asked someone to skip a break, we owe a penalty. Legion uses that response, confirms the break was not taken, and automatically adds the premium to the shift. Now we have a digital record showing that we followed the law and paid the appropriate premiums.”
-
They continued: “In Oregon, if you don’t have a schedule posted 21 days out, you owe a premium to the associate. And if you modify their schedule at the employer’s request within those 21 days, you also owe a premium. It’s a one-hour premium if we ask them to change it. If they change their own schedule, we don’t owe the premium. Legion understands those rules, so as changes are made to a published schedule, we’re no longer stuck trying to prove when it was posted. Legion digitally pushes out the schedule, providing us with a record and automatically calculating and paying any required premium when changes are made. I know we have not had any unfavorable time and attendance lawsuits since going live with Legion.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite organization experiences 10 schedule changes per week per store before Legion.
-
The composite has 700 locations.
-
After Legion, the composite experiences 70% fewer fair workweek payouts at $15 per incident.
-
The composite’s adoption rate of the solution is 75% in Year 1 and 100% in Years 2 and 3.
Risks.
-
The number of retail locations within an organization.
-
The number of schedule changes that an organization experiences before Legion.
-
The penalties an organization must pay for a fair workweek violation.
-
The speed of Legion adoption into an organization.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $7.8 million.
70%
Reduction in fair workweek payouts
Avoided Labor Compliance Penalties And Legal Exposure
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Total schedule changes per week per store | Interviews | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| E2 | Total stores | Composite | 700 | 700 | 700 | |
| E3 | Reduction in fair workweek payouts | Interviews | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| E4 | Payout per incident | Interviews | $15 | $15 | $15 | |
| E5 | Adoption percentage | Interviews | 75% | 100% | 100% | |
| Et | Avoided labor compliance penalties and legal exposure | E1*E2*E3*E4*E5*52 weeks | $2,866,500 | $3,822,000 | $3,822,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Etr | Avoided labor compliance penalties and legal exposure (risk-adjusted) | $2,579,850 | $3,439,800 | $3,439,800 | ||
| Three-year total: $9,459,450 | Three-year present value: $7,772,501 | |||||
Payroll And Workforce Administration Labor Savings
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that improved system automation, streamlined data management, and reduced manual processes enabled meaningful productivity gains for corporate payroll and workforce administration teams. Increased efficiency, driven by routine task automation, improved system integration, and reduced reliance on manual intervention, allowed organizations to reduce administrative effort and operate more efficiently at scale.
Before implementing Legion, interviewees’ organizations relied on manual, time-intensive processes for payroll and workforce administration, including data uploads, budget management, and user administration. After implementing Legion, their organizations automated and streamlined payroll and workforce administration processes, significantly reducing the time required to complete routine administrative tasks.
-
The senior data analyst in the retail industry described the magnitude of improvement: “Just loading our budgets each week would be a 4-hour process to get all of this together. With the way we set up our Legion environment and the integrations we built, we were able to push it into Legion in less than 5 minutes. It was a gigantic administrative burden lifted off our team.”
-
The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry highlighted inefficiencies in workforce data management: “At least 2 hours of an administrator’s work was going into user management every week. They pulled a CSV file from [the HRIS system] and uploaded that to [our legacy workforce management system] to keep users in sync. Now that’s been eliminated.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
Employees located at the corporate headquarters of the composite spend 4 hours uploading budgets before Legion.
-
After Legion, corporate employees spend 5 minutes uploading budgets.
-
Two administrators are responsible for uploading budgets and have an average fully burdened hourly rate of $45.
-
Before Legion, the composite created an average of 20,000 payroll tickets annually.
-
After Legion, the composite creates 44% fewer tickets.
-
Employees spend an average of 30 minutes addressing payroll tickets.
-
The composite’s adoption rate of the solution is 75% in Year 1 and 100% in Years 2 and 3.
-
Forrester conservatively estimates that 50% of the total time saved per manager is applied directly back to value-generating tasks, and it is therefore included in the benefit calculation. Individual managers may apply additional time savings toward professional development, training, and work-life activities, which were not included in the benefit analysis.
Risks. The payroll and workforce administration labor savings may vary based upon:
-
The methods used to upload budgets before deploying Legion.
-
The frequency in which an organization uploads budgets.
-
The number of administrators responsible for uploading budgets.
-
The fully burdened hourly rate for an administrator.
-
The number of payroll discrepancies an organization experiences.
-
The speed of Legion adoption into an organization.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $220,000.
44%
Reduction in payroll tickets
Payroll And Workforce Administration Labor Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Time to upload budgets before Legion (hours) | Interviews | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| F2 | Time to upload budgets after Legion (hours) | Interviews | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | |
| F3 | Upload cycles | Composite | 52 | 52 | 52 | |
| F4 | Administrative support personnel | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| F5 | Fully burdened hourly rate for admin support | Composite | $45 | $45 | $45 | |
| F6 | Subtotal: Savings from weekly budget uploads | (F1-F2)*F3*F4*F5 | $18,346 | $18,346 | $18,346 | |
| F7 | Annual payroll tickets before Legion | Composite | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 | |
| F8 | Percentage reduction after Legion | Interviews | 44% | 44% | 44% | |
| F9 | Time spent per payroll ticket (hours) | Interviews | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| F10 | Subtotal: Savings from reduction in payroll tickets | F7*F8*F9*F5 | $198,000 | $198,000 | $198,000 | |
| F11 | Adoption percentage | Interviews | 75% | 100% | 100% | |
| F12 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Ft | Payroll and workforce administration labor savings | (F6+F10)*F11*F12 | $81,130 | $108,173 | $108,173 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ftr | Payroll and workforce administration labor savings (risk-adjusted) | $73,017 | $97,356 | $97,356 | ||
| Three-year total: $267,728 | Three-year present value: $219,983 | |||||
Unquantified Benefits
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
-
Improved attendance and coverage support higher revenue through team selling. Interviewees reported that improved attendance and shift fulfillment enabled more consistent floor coverage, supporting higher conversion rates by ensuring sufficient staffing for team-based selling. The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry said: “We saw a 19% year-over-year reduction in absenteeism. We’re finding that when associates contact others to fill shifts, those shifts don’t count toward the absenteeism rate. We just completed a full study of an activity-based labor model. What was fascinating to us in the luxury retail space was that our conversion rate when a customer only interacts with one associate is around 11%. And when they interact with more than one associate, it’s around 26%. So you’re talking more than double the conversion rate because a customer interacted with two people. If we don’t have enough associates on the sales floor to provide that team-selling experience, we know we’re cutting our conversion rate in half. It is detrimental to our business.”
-
Centralized workforce data improves visibility into scheduling, performance, and labor allocation. Interviewees reported that AI-driven automation streamlined workforce management processes, reduced manual effort, and improved decision-making. Prior to implementation, scheduling and administrative tasks were largely manual and time-intensive, requiring significant managerial intervention. After adopting Legion, interviewees described scheduling as almost completely automated, with its AI-enabled tools generating optimized schedules that managers only needed to refine. Automation also embeds business rules and compliance requirements directly into workflows, with one interviewee noting that the system “understands all of the compliance thresholds for overtime and staffing rules” and aligns schedules with demand and employee availability. In addition, organizations expanded their use of AI over time to support more advanced optimization, including using employee performance data and KPIs to place associates where they would be most valuable.
-
Improved usability and adoption from a modern user interface. Interviewees reported that Legion’s modern, intuitive user interface improved ease of use across frontline employees and administrators, accelerating adoption while reducing training requirements. They emphasized that its clean design, intuitive workflows, and mobile accessibility reduced friction in daily workforce management tasks and increased engagement. Interviewees consistently linked the “fresh” interface to rapid adoption and minimal training needs. The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry said: “This is probably one of the easiest things I’ve ever launched in terms of an associate perspective. Even from the day of launch, Legion consistently received incredibly high marks from associates, who were just thrilled with the intuitiveness of using the app, receiving their schedules, and clocking in and out. It’s something that just came really naturally. Now we’ve got 92% of our hourly workforce using the Legion mobile app on their personal device, and the level of engagement is astonishing to me.”
-
Workforce behavioral insights inform the ideal associate profile. By centralizing workforce management data and leveraging robust calculated fields, interviewees gained a deeper understanding of employee behavior patterns. The people technology and product leader in the hospitality industry explained: “This is actually one of those surprise and delight things that we gained by centralizing workforce management with Legion. Now, we understand our workforce’s behavior much better. For example, we can see behaviors like who tends to come in early, who tends to clock out late, and who tends not to take their meal breaks. From this behavior, we can essentially create profiles, and using AI, we can analyze who our ideal associate is.”
-
Accelerated deployment reduces time to value. Interviewees reported fast deployment timelines for Legion, even in complex environments, with enterprise-scale rollouts completed in a matter of months. The senior data analyst in the retail industry noted: “We engaged our store teams from the beginning and had store and field leadership involved with the pilot and RFP. We had strong buy-in from our process, and the implementation timeline was very aggressive. We started discovery on December 15, 2022, and we launched across our entire organization by July of 2023.” Although deployment timelines varied by scope, interviewees consistently characterized implementation as quick relative to the scale of the transformation, enabling faster realization of workforce management benefits.
-
Legion InstantPay strengthens differentiation in hiring and frontline talent attraction. Interviewees described Legion InstantPay (earned wage access) as a meaningful differentiator in attracting and engaging frontline talent. The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry stated: “I don’t have an adoption goal; I have an awareness goal. I want all employees to be aware that the program is available to them, but whether an associate uses it is unique to each person’s financial situation. We have 30% adoption of Legion InstantPay so far. Employees have expressed high levels of engagement in engagement surveys. It’s a differentiator for us when we hire and helps us stay competitive. Overall, it’s a positive program for the organization.”
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Legion Workforce Management and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
-
Supports ongoing innovation through new workforce programs and capabilities. Organizations can introduce new employee-facing initiatives, such as on-demand pay (Legion InstantPay) and employee performance and rewards programs, without additional infrastructure investments. The senior director of workforce management in the retail industry noted, “We deployed Legion InstantPay, which wouldn’t have been possible if our energies were focused on keeping the train on the tracks.”
-
Enables rapid adaptation of labor models, roles, and organizational structures. Legion’s configurability enables organizations to quickly introduce new roles, departments, and operating models as business needs evolve. The senior data analyst in the retail industry described a program they are close to deploying: “We have the confidence to build a new department at scale. If we want to create a new role, even in a subset of stores, we can do so quickly and confidently. We’re actively working on a project to change the store’s layout from a departmental perspective. We needed to generate the labor model for it, and we completed all the design elements in our test environment within three weeks. We’re just finishing up testing in that environment, and then we’ll start migrating it to production. It’s not just scheduling; it’s people change, it’s human capital management changes. We met the businesses where they were and checked all their boxes without major significant work.”
-
Creates a foundation for future data-driven workforce optimization and AI-driven decision-making. Enhanced visibility into workforce behavior and performance enables organizations to move beyond basic scheduling toward more advanced operational decisions. Interviewees described using this data to inform staffing alignment with demand patterns, correlate labor coverage with customer and store performance outcomes, and identify behaviors that contribute to stronger operational results. For example, the people technology and product leader noted the ability to “correlate store performance… with who was clocked in at that time,” providing insight into how specific labor decisions impact business outcomes. This visibility also supports future improvements in peak-hour coverage, scheduling strategies, and labor model refinement, positioning organizations to continuously optimize workforce deployment and pursue more advanced AI-driven decisioning over time.
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gtr | Fees paid to Legion | $0 | $1,280,100 | $1,280,100 | $1,280,100 | $3,840,300 | $3,183,419 |
| Htr | Implementation, training, and ongoing management | $139,598 | $126,276 | $58,074 | $58,074 | $382,022 | $346,021 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $139,598 | $1,406,376 | $1,338,174 | $1,338,174 | $4,222,322 | $3,529,440 |
Fees Paid To Legion
Evidence and data. The composite organization pays license fees to Legion that are dependent on the size and scope of the project. Pricing may vary. Contact Legion for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
Annual fees for the Legion platform are $1,280,100 per year for 15,000 employees using:
- Platform Services
- Optimized Scheduling
- Time and Attendance Management
- Employee Engagement Suite
- Strategic Insight
- Workato
- Customer Experience Services
- This pricing is based on a five-year contractual agreement.
Risks. The fees to Legion may vary depending on the project scope and Legion platform deployment, in terms of the number of employees and modules in use.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.2 million.
Fees Paid To Legion
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Fees paid to Legion | Legion | $1,066,750 | $1,066,750 | $1,066,750 | |
| Gt | Fees paid to Legion | G1 | $0 | $1,066,750 | $1,066,750 | $1,066,750 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑20% | |||||
| Gtr | Fees paid to Legion (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $1,280,100 | $1,280,100 | $1,280,100 | |
| Three-year total: $3,840,300 | Three-year present value: $3,183,419 | |||||
Implementation, Training, And Ongoing Management
Evidence and data. Interviewees described the implementation, training, and ongoing management of the Legion platform as streamlined, requiring relatively limited internal resources due to its intuitive system design and embedded guidance. Costs were primarily driven by internal employee time for implementation, configuration, and training activities, including:
-
Involvement from operations and program teams to support implementation, configuration, and rollout. Interviewees consistently described lean, cross-functional teams supporting deployment alongside Legion. One workforce management leader shared: “We had a core team of about 12 people, but not everybody involved was 100% on this. We were still doing our day jobs.” The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry noted that implementation ownership typically remained a partial allocation, stating that the effort was “probably about 50% of my workload during the pilot and in the couple of months after launch before declining to ongoing support levels of 10% to 20% of time.”
-
Limited IT involvement, primarily focused on integrations and data connectivity. Interviewees reported that technical effort was concentrated on initial integrations with legacy HRIS or payroll systems, with relatively low ongoing burden. The DVP of retail innovation and operations in the retail industry described integration as “fairly easily.” He said: “We were able to get the API calls to [our legacy HRIS system] set up very easily, and then anything else we used in FTP for reporting. Compared to other projects I’ve worked on, I’ve seen much fewer headaches with Legion.”
-
Short and efficient deployment timelines supported by vendor collaboration. Across interviews, interviewees reported rapid implementation cycles relative to other enterprise workforce systems. One organization completed the full rollout within approximately six months, despite its large scale and complexity. Another completed implementation from integration start to go-live between roughly four and five months.
-
Manager and employee training enabled through intuitive design and embedded learning tools. Training requirements were modest due to the usability of the platform and in-app guidance. Interviewees emphasized that frontline employees required minimal formal training due to the system’s intuitiveness. For managers, training was more structured but still lightweight, consisting of pre-launch materials (documentation and videos), followed by short-term support such as office hours during the first few weeks. Additionally, in-app guidance tools reduced reliance on formal classroom training, enabling users to self-serve.
-
Ongoing support and management required limited steady-state effort. After implementation, interviewees reported relatively low ongoing administrative overhead. Product ownership and support activities typically required a small portion of an individual’s time (approximately 10% to 20%), focused on activities such as troubleshooting, feature adoption, and periodic optimization.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
Three operations FTEs give 50% of their time to participate in the initial implementation for three months. One operations FTE stays involved for 20% of their time per year to manage overall system ownership. In Years 2 and 3, one operations FTE spends 10% of their time managing overall system ownership.
-
One IT FTE dedicates 15% of their time toward platform implementation in the initial three months. In Year 1, two IT FTEs dedicate 5% of their time to update employee data.
-
All managers on the platform participate in 2 hours of training before onboarding onto the Legion platform. They take part in 1 hour of ongoing training per year to stay current on system updates.
Risks. The implementation, training, and ongoing management fees may vary depending on:
-
The complexity and scope of transitioning from a former workforce management platform to Legion.
-
The number of FTEs dedicated to the adoption and management of the Legion platform and their salaries.
-
The number, length, and frequency of trainings and the hourly rates of attendees.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $346,000.
Implementation, Training, And Ongoing Management
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Operations FTEs involved in implementation and ongoing maintenance | Interviews | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| H2 | Time dedicated by operations FTEs (months) | Interviews | 3 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| H3 | Percentage of operations FTE time dedicated to Legion implementation | Interviews | 50% | 20% | 10% | 10% |
| H4 | Fully burdened annual salary for an operations FTE | Composite | $164,700 | $164,700 | $164,700 | $164,700 |
| H5 | Subtotal: Operations cost of implementation and ongoing maintenance |
H1*H2*H3*(H4/12 months) |
$61,763 | $65,880 | $16,470 | $16,470 |
| H6 | IT FTEs involved in implementation | Interviews | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| H7 | Time dedicated by IT FTEs (months) | Interviews | 3 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| H8 | Percentage of IT FTE time dedicated to Legion implementation | Interviews | 15% | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| H9 | Average fully burdened monthly rate for an IT FTE | Composite | $12,375 | $12,375 | $12,375 | $12,375 |
| H10 | Subtotal: IT cost of implementation | H6*H7*H8*H9 | $5,569 | $14,850 | $7,425 | $7,425 |
| H11 | Managers on platform | Composite | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
| H12 | Manager training time (hours) | Interviews | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| H13 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a manager | D7 | $35 | $35 | $35 | $35 |
| H14 | Subtotal: Training fees | H11*H12*H13 | $49,000 | $24,500 | $24,500 | $24,500 |
| Ht | Implementation, training, and ongoing management | H5+H10+H14 | $116,331 | $105,230 | $48,395 | $48,395 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑20% | |||||
| Htr | Implementation, training, and ongoing management (risk-adjusted) | $139,598 | $126,276 | $58,074 | $58,074 | |
| Three-year total: $382,022 | Three-year present value: $346,021 | |||||
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($139,598) | ($1,406,376) | ($1,338,174) | ($1,338,174) | ($4,222,322) | ($3,529,440) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $16,301,362 | $22,809,209 | $22,809,209 | $61,919,779 | $50,806,902 |
| Net benefits | ($139,598) | $14,894,986 | $21,471,034 | $21,471,034 | $57,697,457 | $47,277,462 |
| ROI | 1340% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Legion Workforce Management.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Legion Workforce Management can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Legion stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Legion Workforce Management.
Interviews
Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Legion Workforce Management to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Composite Organization
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Endnotes
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
2 Source: Gallup, The Benefits of Employee Engagement, February 16, 2026.
3 Net Promoter and NPS are registered service marks, and Net Promoter Score is a service mark, of Bain & Company, Inc., Satmetrix Systems, Inc., and Fred Reichheld.
4 Source: César A. Henao, Improving the robustness of retail workforce management with a labor flexibility strategy and consideration of demand uncertainty, 2025.
5 Source: Modeled Wage Estimates, US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Legion and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Legion Workforce Management. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Legion Workforce Management based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Legion or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Legion and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Legion make no warranties of any kind.
Legion reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Legion provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Amy Harrison
Marianne Friis
Published
July 2026