Executive Summary
Influencer marketing is accelerating. As brands expand creator programs across more markets and channels, marketing leaders are expected to run campaigns across multiple countries without a corresponding increase in headcount. The tools and processes they use, however, weren’t built to scale across countries and cultures: Their influencer selection relies on manual research, campaign tracking lives in disjointed spreadsheets, and reporting involves chasing screenshots across email chains. Lack of centralized data results in decisions made on instinct, inconsistencies across markets, and struggles to demonstrate the function’s impact to leadership.
Kolsquare is a SaaS platform that enables organizations to scale influencer marketing. By centralizing influencer data, automating core workflows, and standardizing reporting across teams and geographies, it transforms influencer marketing from a collection of disconnected manual tasks into a structured, data-driven function that across borders and earns its place in the wider brand strategy.
Kolsquare commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Kolsquare.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Kolsquare on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Kolsquare. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a consumer retail organization with operations in 10 countries that runs about 50 influencer campaigns per country.
Prior to using Kolsquare, influencer marketing at the interviewees’ organizations was undisciplined. Teams sourced creators through manual research, tracked campaigns in spreadsheets, and negotiated deals over email chains and chat threads. Reporting was mostly done by assembling screenshots. Each country had its own approach, adopted its own tools, and established its own source of truth. The result was siloed data, inconsistent processes, and a struggle to scale or justify the function to leadership.
After deploying Kolsquare, those same teams reported that fragmentation gave way to a shared foundation. They could centralize influencer data across countries, automate content collection and campaign reporting, and replace a patchwork of local spreadsheets with standardized dashboards. Teams reduced the time spent on manual screening, creator identification, and report preparation significantly, freeing capacity for more strategic work. Consistent metrics made it easier to share meaningful insights with product, communications, and leadership teams. And access to influencer history and performance data gave teams the confidence to make smarter, less risky creator decisions.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
-
Influencer profile search time savings. Kolsquare’s advanced search and filtering features allow the composite’s teams to find and vet relevant influencers faster based on campaign needs, audience fit, and historical performance, saving about 45 minutes per profile for 75% of activated influencers. Over three years, the net present value of these time savings is worth €360,000 to the composite organization.
-
Campaign content tracking efficiency improvements of 5 hours per campaign. By automatically tracking and centralizing influencer-generated content, Kolsquare eliminates the need for manual content screening across social media platforms during campaigns. This saves around 5 hours of effort per campaign. With 500 yearly campaigns run across 10 countries, the net present value savings for campaign content tracking is worth about €226,000 over three years.
-
Reporting and analysis time savings. Kolsquare consolidates campaign performance data and listening insights across countries, eliminating manual data gathering, annotation, and reconciliation across siloed data sources while enabling fast and consistent internal reporting. These efficiencies include saving about 10 hours on campaign report preparation per country-level report, 30 minutes per campaign on internal statistics sharing, and 20 hours per year on competitive ranking and brand positioning report preparation through the platform’s listening capabilities. Over three years, the net present value of these combined time savings is worth €278,000 to the composite organization.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Enhanced brand salience and market positioning through social media listening. Kolsquare’s listening and benchmarking features provide visibility into brand mentions, competitive activity, and relative positioning on social media. This transparency enables marketing and communications teams to assess brand salience, understand competitive rankings, and inform brand positioning and strategic planning using consistent, benchmarked data.
-
Improved campaign performance and strategic agility through integrated analytics. Kolsquare’s integrated visibility into campaign KPIs, brand mentions, and content performance allows teams to identify what works, adjust influencer strategies throughout the year, and improve campaign effectiveness across paid, organic, and seeding activities.
-
Professionalization and increased credibility of the influencer marketing function. By providing a dedicated, enterprise‑grade platform with standardized reporting and trusted data, Kolsquare helps the composite move influencer marketing from fragmented, manual execution to a structured and credible discipline. This improves internal trust across teams and leadership while strengthening external credibility with partner brands.
-
Reduced reputational risk and improved values alignment. Access to influencer history, credibility indicators, and keyword‑based content review enables teams to better assess brand fit, reduce reputational risk, and ensure alignment with internal brand and ethical guidelines.
-
Improved employee experience for influencer marketing teams. By eliminating repetitive manual screening, weekend monitoring, and ad hoc reporting, Kolsquare improves the daily experience of the composite’s PR, social media, and influence teams, allowing them to focus on higher‑value strategic work.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
-
Deployment costs of €4,800. The composite organization incurs initial deployment costs that include 25 hours of testing by two internal FTEs and 1 hour of training for each of the 40 users. These efforts ensure a smooth onboarding process and familiarization with the platform’s core features.
-
License costs of €376,000. The composite organization pays an annual license fee of €144,000 for access to Kolsquare’s platform, covering 40 user licenses across 10 countries and central administrative access. Over three years, the total present value of these license costs is €376,000.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of €863,000 over three years versus costs of €381,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of €483,000 and an ROI of 127%.
Key Statistics
127%
Return on investment (ROI)
€863K
Benefits PV
€483K
Net present value (NPV)
<6 months
Payback
Benefits (Three-Year)
The Kolsquare Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the Kolsquare investment
Interviews
| Role | Industry | Region | Regional employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer marketing manager | Retail | France | 94,000 |
| Head of public relations (PR) and influence | Beauty | Europe (15 countries, including the UK) | ~15,000 |
| Regional influence, PR, and events manager | Beauty and skincare | EMEA (20 countries) | ~5,000 |
| Head of communications | Fashion | France and Belgium | 100 |
Key Challenges
Prior to adopting Kolsquare, interviewees’ organizations typically relied on a mix of manual processes, outsourced agency labor, and various country-specific tools to manage influencer marketing. This approach became increasingly difficult to sustain as campaign volumes grew and influencer marketing expanded across geographies and internal teams.
Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
-
Fragmented influencer marketing data across teams and countries. Different functions managed influencer activities, including internal PR, social media, and paid media teams as well as external agency partners, which often used different tools or processes. Preparing campaign and competitive reports required manual data collection, reconciliation, and data source annotation. As a result, data was inconsistent across countries and teams, making it difficult to create coordinated reports or gain a consolidated view of influencer performance at a regional or organizational level.
The head of PR and influence at a beauty organization noted, “At a European scale, creating reports was a challenge as there was no harmony in the data.”
The influencer marketing manager at a retail company noted that internal collaboration was inefficient due to lack of trusted, standardized metrics, which reduced confidence in reporting and limited the ability of teams to share insights quickly with internal stakeholders. -
High reliance on manual content monitoring and validation. Teams spent significant time manually screening influencer content directly on social media platforms to track campaign-related and organic mentions. This work was labor-intensive, often extended into evenings and weekends, and limited teams’ ability to scale influencer marketing without adding headcount. The influencer marketing manager in retail said, “Influencers typically publish content on weekends, and every weekend we had to wake up and manually review all of the content that was published.”
-
Inefficient influencer discovery and vetting processes. In markets without dedicated tools, teams manually searched for influencers and evaluated profiles one by one. This approach made it difficult to identify new creators systematically, ensure audience relevance by country, or evaluate qualitative and quantitative profile indicators such as content history and engagement consistency. One interviewee said, “Before Kolsquare, if teams wanted to find an influencer or content creator by community size of interest, it took much longer.”
-
Limited internal credibility and governance of influencer marketing.
Because of fragmented influencer marketing data and unstandardized reporting, interviewees said their teams struggled to demonstrate the maturity and impact of influencer marketing internally. This reduced trust from leadership and partner teams and increased perceived operational and reputational risk.
Solution Requirements
To address these challenges, the interviewees searched for a solution that could:
-
Provide a single source of truth for influencer marketing data across countries and teams. The solution needed to centralize influencer profiles, content, and performance data to enable consistent reporting and improve collaboration across markets and internal functions.
-
Automate influencer content collection and monitoring. Interviewees looked for a solution that could automatically capture influencer-generated content, including organic mentions, to significantly reduce manual screening efforts and ensure no relevant content was missed.
-
Improve efficiency and precision in influencer discovery. Interviewees’ organizations required advanced search and filtering capabilities to identify influencers based on audience location, content themes, engagement indicators, and historical activity, particularly in countries where teams previously lacked dedicated tools.
-
Standardize reporting and support scalable analytics. The solution needed to enable teams to generate campaign and competitive reports using consistent metrics and trusted data sources, reducing dependency on agencies and manual reconciliation.
-
Support governance, risk mitigation, and professionalization of influencer marketing. Interviewees sought better visibility into influencer history, credibility, and content context to reduce reputational risk and align influencer selection with internal brand guidelines and compliance standards.
After evaluating multiple alternatives, including agency-led approaches and other influencer marketing platforms, the interviewees’ organizations selected Kolsquare and deployed it across multiple countries and influencer marketing teams to support a more unified, data-driven, and scalable influencer marketing strategy.
Composite Organization
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
-
Description of composite. The composite organization is a European-based consumer brand with influencer marketing operations spanning 10 countries across the region. The organization runs approximately 50 influencer campaigns per country per year, totaling 500 campaigns globally, with an average of 15 influencers activated per campaign. Its influencer marketing function is supported by a team of 40 influencer marketing and PR professionals distributed across local and central teams.
-
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization begins using Kolsquare in Year 1 to support influencer selection and content tracking for campaigns across 10 European countries. It deploys the platform immediately to 40 users. Local market teams and central coordination functions use Kolsquare to manage influencer discovery, campaign execution, and performance reporting.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
-
40 influencer marketing and PR employees globally
-
10 countries
-
50 influencer marketing campaigns per country
-
15 influencers per campaign on average
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Influencer profile search time savings | €131,845 | €145,029 | €159,532 | €436,407 | €359,577 |
| Btr | Campaign content tracking efficiency improvements | €82,726 | €90,999 | €100,099 | €273,824 | €225,617 |
| Ctr | Reporting and analysis time savings | €110,269 | €111,940 | €113,778 | €335,987 | €278,240 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | €324,840 | €347,968 | €373,409 | €1,046,217 | €863,434 |
Influencer Profile Search Time Savings
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that before Kolsquare, identifying and vetting influencers was a time-consuming and inconsistent process. Teams relied on manual social media searches, basic metrics like follower counts, superficial engagement checks, and personal judgment to select influencers. This approach resulted in lengthy efforts and misaligned creator selection, with suboptimal audience-brand affinity and inconsistent selection criteria across countries. After implementing Kolsquare, interviewees mentioned their teams could quickly discover relevant creators using advanced filters and search criteria instead of screening through social platforms manually.
-
The head of PR and influence at a beauty company said: “In our field, the line separating personal and professional is thin. With Kolsquare, we made it much thicker. The profile search allows us to know who cited our brand, which helps us recruit new profiles and improve our performance. We can also filter content by earned media value (EMV), and we can find content we may have otherwise not have visibility into because it was not part our campaign or we didn’t have an influencer on our radar.”
-
The same interviewee added: “There are a lot of filters to help us scan influencers. If we want content creators that have somewhere between 80 to 110,000 followers, we can select this. We can also filter the engagement rate, the interests of their community such as fragrance, healthy lifestyle, and so on. This helps us save a lot of time rather than doing a manual search directly on the social media platforms.”
-
In addition to Kolsquare’s searching and filtering capabilities, the interviewees also mentioned the platform’s listening feature, which helped them see who their competitors engage with, further saving them time finding relevant creators. The influencer marketing manager at a retail organization said: “Kolsquare’s listening feature is very impactful. It helps us filter who our competitors work with. This helps us save time because competitors work with similar influencers to us.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite runs 500 influencer marketing campaigns across 10 countries in Year 1, with campaign volume growing 10% annually as influencer marketing becomes more efficient and effective.
-
Each campaign leverages an average of 15 influencers.
-
Seventy-five percent of campaign influencers are discovered via Kolsquare’s profile search; 25% come from other sources.
-
The composite saves 45 minutes of search and validation time per profile found via Kolsquare.
-
The fully burdened hourly rate for a PR specialist is €46.
-
The composite has an 80% productivity recapture rate, which means 80% of the time saved is used for productive work.
Risks. Several factors may impact the level of savings linked to influencer profile search, including:
-
The number of yearly campaigns.
-
The average number of influencers leveraged per campaign and their complexity to source.
-
The share of influencers found via Kolsquare and the preexisting influencer database.
-
The internal team’s skills and capabilities in influencer discovery.
-
The salaries of PR specialists.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €360,000.
75%
Search time saved per influencer
Influencer Profile Search Time Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Campaigns | Composite | 500 | 550 | 605 | |
| A2 | Average influencers per campaign | Composite | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| A3 | Influencers activated | A1*A2 | 7,500 | 8,250 | 9,075 | |
| A4 | Percentage of influencers found via Kolsquare | Composite | 75% | 75% | 75% | |
| A5 | Total influencers found via Kolsquare | A3*A4 | 5,625 | 6,188 | 6,806 | |
| A6 | Search time saved per influencer profile (hours) | Interviews | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| A7 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a PR specialist | TEI methodology | €46 | €46 | €46 | |
| A8 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| At | Influencer profile search time savings | A5*A6*A7*A8 | €155,112 | €170,623 | €187,685 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Atr | Influencer profile search time savings (risk-adjusted) | €131,845 | €145,029 | €159,532 | ||
| Three-year total: €436,407 | Three-year present value: €359,577 | |||||
Campaign Content Tracking Efficiency Improvements
Evidence and data. Interviewees mentioned that monitoring influencer campaigns across social media was previously labor-intensive and hard to scale. Before Kolsquare, internal teams had to check multiple social media platforms manually to see which influencers had posted, then collect and reconcile performance data from each platform’s native analytics — all of which use different metrics and formats. This manual process was slow and prone to data gaps. Kolsquare automatically collects and updates key social media metrics (e.g., posts, reach, engagement, EMV) in one dashboard, freeing teams from chasing data and enabling them to focus on campaign optimization.
-
The head of communications at a fashion organization highlighted: “With Kolsquare, we can easily see how many people posted, what the EMV is, how much content was posted, and the reach. When we run campaigns, we don’t have to check manually who posted or not; we see exactly who posted and when, and we have direct access to the analysis. Without Kolsquare, we wouldn’t get that level of information. We’d need to look at social media every day to see who posted or not. ... This is a few hours per campaign saved.”
-
The head of PR and influence at a beauty organization similarly noted: “The time spent on tracking influencers’ content during campaigns was about 5 to 10 hours of content search. Now, [with Kolsquare], it’s all automated.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite runs 500 influencer marketing campaigns across 10 countries in Year 1, with campaign volume growing 10% annually.
-
Using Kolsquare saves 5 hours of manual tracking per campaign.
-
The fully burdened hourly rate for a PR specialist is €46.
-
The composite has an 80% productivity recapture rate, which means 80% of the time saved is used for productive work.
Risks. Several factors may impact the level of campaign content tracking efficiency improvement savings, including:
-
The number of campaigns per year and how extensively a team tracks influencer activity.
-
Campaign complexity and the volume of influencer content to monitor.
-
The team’s existing skills or tools for campaign monitoring.
-
The salaries of PR specialists.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €226,000.
5 hours
Content tracking time saved per campaign
Campaign Content Tracking Efficiency Improvements
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Campaigns | A1 | 500 | 550 | 605 | |
| B2 | Content tracking time saved per campaign (hours) | Interviews | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| B3 | Total campaign content tracking time savings (hours) | B1*B2 | 2,500 | 2,750 | 3,025 | |
| B4 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a PR specialist | A7 | €46 | €46 | €46 | |
| B5 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| Bt | Campaign content tracking efficiency improvements | B3*B4*B5 | €91,918 | €101,110 | €111,221 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Btr | Campaign content tracking efficiency improvements (risk-adjusted) | €82,726 | €90,999 | €100,099 | ||
| Three-year total: €273,824 | Three-year present value: €225,617 | |||||
Reporting And Analysis Time Savings
Evidence and data. Interviewees described a manual and fragmented approach to preparing influencer campaign reports and gathering competitive insights before Kolsquare. Each country team relied on separate processes and had to aggregate data from emails, spreadsheets, social media platforms, and different internal tools, which made it time-consuming to assemble reliable reports or present a unified view of performance. By introducing a single source of truth for all influencer campaign data and listening insights, Kolsquare streamlined report generation and improved cross-team collaboration. Interviewees highlighted the following areas of time savings:
-
Cross-country campaign report preparation. The head of PR and influence at a beauty organization explained that consolidating campaign data on one platform significantly reduced the effort required to prepare reports. They said: “Before, we had to mention the data source on each slide for each country. Now it’s all trusted sources from Kolsquare. About a dozen hours per report are saved from no longer investigating and indicating data sources.”
-
Campaign statistics internal sharing. Interviewees previously used manual updates to share campaign performance internally. With Kolsquare, teams can share links directly with stakeholders, reducing back-and-forth communication and manual preparation. The influencer marketing manager at a retail company mentioned: “Today, product teams can ask us about influencers that are working on a campaign, and we can share a link to the casting. They can ask us about statistics on the campaign, and we can share with them directly without having to write [a summary] manually.”
-
Competitive benchmark reports. Interviewees highlighted time savings from Kolsquare’s listening capabilities, which provide structured competitive benchmarks and rankings that were previously difficult to compile. The influencer marketing manager at a retail organization said: “Before, we were looking manually at what competitors were doing on their accounts and trying to understand which influencers were talking about our competitors. Today, we have a benchmark produced by Kolsquare that allows us to get a lot of useful insights.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
The composite operates in 10 countries, each preparing 12 campaign performance reports per year.
-
Kolsquare saves the composite 10 hours per report by eliminating manual data gathering and reconciliation.
-
Kolsquare also helps the composite save 30 minutes per campaign due to easier internal sharing of campaign statistics and results.
-
Kolsquare’s listening module saves the composite 20 hours per country per year by streamlining competitive and brand positioning report creation.
-
A PR manager prepares all reports.
-
The fully burdened hourly rate for a PR manager is €93.
Risks. Risks that could impact the realization of this benefit include:
-
The number and frequency of reports generated.
-
The complexity of internal reporting processes before Kolsquare.
-
The availability of competitive data.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €278,000.
10 hours
Time saved per campaign performance report
Reporting And Analysis Time Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Campaign performance reports per country | Composite | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
| C2 | Countries | Composite | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| C3 | Time saved per report on preparation and data consolidation (hours) | Interviews | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| C4 | Report preparation time savings (hours) | C1*C2*C3 | 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,200 | |
| C5 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a PR manager | TEI methodology | €93 | €93 | €93 | |
| C6 | Report preparation savings | C4*C5 | €111,383 | €111,383 | €111,383 | |
| C7 | Time saved per campaign on internal sharing of campaign statistics (hours) | Interviews | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| C8 | Campaign statistics internal sharing savings | A1*C5*C7 | €23,205 | €25,525 | €28,078 | |
| C9 | Market competition listening time savings per country (hours) | Interviews | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| C10 | Market competition listening time savings | C9*C2*C5 | €18,564 | €18,564 | €18,564 | |
| C11 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| Ct | Reporting and analysis time savings | (C6+C8+C10)*C11 | €122,521 | €124,378 | €126,420 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Reporting and analysis time savings (risk-adjusted) | €110,269 | €111,940 | €113,778 | ||
| Three-year total: €335,987 | Three-year present value: €278,240 | |||||
Unquantified Benefits
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
-
Enhanced brand salience and market positioning through social media listening. Interviewees reported that Kolsquare’s listening and benchmarking features gave their organizations a clear view of competitor activity and how their own brands ranked on social channels. With these insights, marketing and communications teams made more data-driven brand positioning decisions and adjusted strategies based on benchmarked competitive performance. The influencer marketing manager in retail said: “The listening feature helps us position against our competitors and understand if we are well positioned or not. … This was very difficult to do before.” By surfacing competitive visibility that was once hard to obtain, Kolsquare’s listening insights have become an input for strategic planning and internal brand health presentations.
-
Improved campaign performance and strategic agility through integrated analytics. Interviewees said that Kolsquare’s integrated view of campaign KPIs, influencer content, and brand mentions improved their ability to monitor performance and adapt influencer strategies throughout the year. With real-time access to metrics such as engagement, reach, and EMV, teams could identify which creators and tactics drove results, allowing them to make timely adjustments. As a result, interviewees noted improved campaign effectiveness and greater confidence in achieving, and often exceeding, performance objectives. The regional influence, PR, and events manager at a beauty and skincare organization described how these insights helped teams refine gifting and activation strategies by focusing on creators who consistently performed and quickly identifying those who did not deliver expected outcomes. They said: “Kolsquare helps us adjust our strategy in terms of creators we gift to make sure they will post more organically later on. … It also helps us see creators who we gifted and didn’t post. Ultimately, it helps us select creators who performed better in terms of EMV to improve our ranking and visibility.”
-
Professionalization and increased credibility of the influencer marketing function. Interviewees consistently reported that Kolsquare helped transform influencer marketing from a disjointed, manual set of tasks into a structured, strategic function within their organization. By centralizing reporting and performance metrics in a dedicated platform, Kolsquare introduced standardized workflows and a single source of truth for influencer data. This improved transparency and consistency across teams and regions, which the interviewees said strengthened the internal credibility of the influencer marketing function.
The influencer marketing manager in retail explained, “Kolsquare professionalized the team and helped us analyze more by collecting more data and insights and [providing the] means to share those internally.”
Interviewees also noted improvements in how they communicated influencer marketing results internally and externally. With Kolsquare, they generated reports in a consistent and professional format that stakeholders found easy to interpret, with underlying data viewed as more reliable. The head of PR and influence at a beauty company said, “Our reports are now more professional from having a single source.” Externally, the increased consistency and clarity supported a more data-driven approach to influencer campaigns when working with partner brands and agencies. The same interviewee added, “Our partners understand us better now.”
In addition, interviewees described more efficient cross-team collaboration enabled by easier access to campaign information. The ability to share campaign dashboards and performance results via direct links allowed internal stakeholders, such as product or regional marketing teams, to access up-to-date influencer campaign metrics without relying on ad hoc manual updates. Interviewees said this reduced back-and-forth communication and supported clearer alignment across teams, further reinforcing the role of influencer marketing as a credible and increasingly strategic function across the business.
-
Reduced reputational risk and improved values alignment. Interviewees noted that Kolsquare’s access to influencer history, credibility indicators, and content context improved their ability to assess brand fit and reduce reputational risk. By enabling teams to review past content, detect questionable engagement patterns, and screen for topics that may conflict with brand or ethical guidelines, the platform supported more responsible influencer selection. Interviewees said this increased due diligence provided greater confidence that partnerships aligned with corporate values and regulatory requirements, helping protect their brand from potential reputational or compliance issues.
The regional influence, PR, and events manager at a beauty and skincare organization said: “With Kolsquare, we are more informed. It evaluates the risks for us. The keyword search specifically helps us search for topics that our group considers potentially risky, and [then we can] avoid [influencers who post about those topics].” -
Improved employee experience for influencer marketing teams. Interviewees reported that automating manual tasks and centralizing workflows with Kolsquare improved the daily experience of influencer marketing teams. Activities that previously required repetitive effort or off-hours work, such as manual content screening or weekend monitoring, were handled automatically within the platform. Prior to using Kolsquare, interviewees mentioned that their teams often relied on manual checks across social platforms, including reviewing content on personal devices outside of working hours. With Kolsquare, these practices were no longer necessary, helping reduce workload strain and support better work-life balance.
Interviewees also described improvements in usability due to the platform’s intuitive interface, allowing team members to become productive quickly and spend more time on strategic and creative work rather than manual administrative tasks. The influencer marketing manager in retail noted, “The tool is very intuitive; it’s very easy to use and learn for every new team member.”
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Kolsquare and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
-
Brand strategy and marketing tactic budgeting mix optimization. In the context of deeper marketing budget scrutiny, marketing teams plan to use Kolsquare to gain a granular understanding of the type of engagement their marketing content drives — fast, measurable results or compounding long-term traffic — which will help them decide how to optimize budget allocation to brand strategy and campaign tactics. The regional influence, PR, and events manager at a beauty and skincare organization mentioned: “Kolsquare anticipates our needs. For instance, one of the latest functionalities released gives you a split view of paid versus organic marketing, which is something we were looking for.”
-
Cross-country collaboration and optimization. The centralized view and cross-country tool and process standardization allows for more informed decision-making on country-specific needs and for more fruitful cross-country collaboration. The regional influence, PR, and events manager at a beauty and skincare organization also noted, “Having a central view across different countries allows us to have more visibility on trends in different countries and take them into account during our regional strategy [planning].”
-
International expansion support. As interviewees’ organizations expand or plan to expand internationally, their marketing teams need to scale operations quickly and effectively to drive growth. They rely on Kolsquare to do so in fully new contexts where they lack knowledge. The head of communications at a fashion company said: “Kolsquare helps us on the international expansion of our brand because we’re working with profiles that we know less about. It helps us ensure we’re engaging with the right profiles in new countries where we sell our products.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtr | Deployment efforts | €4,757 | €0 | €0 | €0 | €4,757 | €4,757 |
| Etr | License cost | €0 | €151,200 | €151,200 | €151,200 | €453,600 | €376,012 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | €4,757 | €151,200 | €151,200 | €151,200 | €458,357 | €380,769 |
Deployment Efforts
Evidence and data. Interviewees explained that deploying the Kolsquare platform required little effort and primarily included some testing and a 1-hour training session for the 40 licensed users.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
Two FTEs test the solution for 25 hours each.
-
Forty users each dedicate 1 hour to platform training.
Risks. The following risks could impact the Kolsquare deployment:
-
The number of licensed users.
-
The prior environment.
-
The team’s existing experience and knowledge of influencer marketing.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €5,000.
1 hour
Training time for full platform onboarding
Deployment Efforts
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | FTEs | Composite | 2 | |||
| D2 | Time contributed to testing per FTE (hours) | Composite | 25 | |||
| D3 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an FTE | A7 | €46 | |||
| D4 | Testing cost | D1*D2*D3 | €2,298 | |||
| D5 | Training efforts (hours) | Composite | 1 | |||
| D6 | Users | Composite | 40 | |||
| D7 | Training cost | D3*D5*D6 | €1,838 | |||
| Dt | Deployment efforts | D4+D7 | €4,136 | €0 | €0 | €0 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑15% | |||||
| Dtr | Deployment efforts (risk-adjusted) | €4,757 | €0 | €0 | €0 | |
| Three-year total: €4,757 | Three-year present value: €4,757 | |||||
License Cost
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that the Kolsquare pricing structure is based on user licenses and countries where they deploy the solution. They mentioned that Kolsquare uses a tiered pricing model, where the price per user decreases as the number of licenses increases.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the composite organization’s annual license fee is €144,000 for 40 users based in 10 countries, which includes individual countries’ dashboards, central regional dashboard access, and the competitive listening feature across all countries.
Risks. Risks that could impact this cost include:
-
Number of licensed users.
-
Number of countries of operations.
-
Selected Kolsquare features.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €376,000.
License Cost
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Yearly license cost | Composite | €144,000 | €144,000 | €144,000 | |
| Et | License cost | E1 | €144,000 | €144,000 | €144,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Etr | License cost (risk-adjusted) | €0 | €151,200 | €151,200 | €151,200 | |
| Three-year total: €453,600 | Three-year present value: €376,012 | |||||
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | (€4,757) | (€151,200) | (€151,200) | (€151,200) | (€458,357) | (€380,769) |
| Total benefits | €0 | €324,840 | €347,968 | €373,409 | €1,046,217 | €863,434 |
| Net benefits | (€4,757) | €173,640 | €196,768 | €222,209 | €587,860 | €482,665 |
| ROI | 127% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Kolsquare.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Kolsquare can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Kolsquare stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Kolsquare.
Interviews
Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Kolsquare to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Composite Organization
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Endnotes
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Kolsquare and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Kolsquare. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Kolsquare based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Kolsquare or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Kolsquare and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Kolsquare make no warranties of any kind.
Kolsquare reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Kolsquare provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Alexis Ouelhadj
Published
June 2026