A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Klaviyo, AUGUST 2023
Understanding customer behavior and orchestrating personalized campaigns aligned with customers’ needs and preferences depend on a steady supply of complete, accurate, and timely data.1 Cross-channel campaign management (CCCM) empowers organizations to engage with customers in their moments of need and deliver more relevant customer content to the right audience, at the right time, and most importantly, on their preferred channels.
Although companies need and want to communicate with their customers, research shows most companies don’t do so in a way that works for customers. In fact, self-guided interactions make up 51% of all types of buyer interactions — marketers can no longer assume that one-size-fits-all programs or activities will work for all buyer journeys or buying processes.2 Email service providers (ESPs) and marketing automation platforms can bridge that gap by offering more robust customer analytics data to help companies target high-value customers more effectively, enabling them to send the right message, at the right time, to the right person. Klaviyo is a marketing automation and customer data platform offering online brands direct ownership of their consumer data and interactions, empowering them to turn customer actions into long-term relationships at scale. With Klaviyo, brands can combine customer data with more than 300 prebuilt integrations to create unified customer profiles and automate personalized omnichannel communications that make customers feel seen.
Klaviyo commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study that examines the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Klaviyo.3 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Klaviyo on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed eight Klaviyo customers with experience using Klaviyo. Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a retail organization with a revenue of $150 million per year and a 10% net profit margin. It uses Klaviyo on both its email and SMS channels. It also sends over 145 million email messages to active accounts and 24 million SMS messages each year.
Prior to using Klaviyo, these interviewees noted how their organizations were unable to execute a cohesive customer journey across marketing channels. As a result, customer engagement data silos emerged, making it harder for the interviewees to personalize customer messages and customize engagement through both email and SMS touchpoints. These limitations led to an inability to message at scale, which resulted in lower customer acquisition and retention rates, and missed revenue generation opportunities. Moreover, because their previous marketing automation platform(s) also made it challenging to build and automate personalized customer journeys — interviewees shared that they needed to spend additional time to manually build these paths themselves and rely on developers and designers for additional support prior to Klaviyo.
By using Klaviyo for both their email marketing and SMS channels, the composite organization gains access to a more unified view of their customer engagement data. This encourages more targeted campaigns and more personalized messages and drives additional revenue. Furthermore, Klaviyo’s APIs and easy-to-build templates enable the composite organization to save on internal labor costs.
Consulting Team: Stephanie Slate, Sarah Lervold
Return on investment (ROI):
Benefits PV:
Net present value (NPV):
Payback:
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $4.5 million over three years versus costs of $1.4 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $3.1 million and an ROI of 228%.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment Klaviyo.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Klaviyo can have on an organization.
Interviewed Klaviyo stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Klaviyo.
Interviewed eight Klaviyo customers at organizations using Klaviyo to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Klaviyo and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Klaviyo.
Klaviyo reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Klaviyo provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
| Role | Industry | Revenue | Number Of Active Profiles In Klaviyo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founder and co-CEO | Luxury goods | $50 million | 600,000 |
| Senior customer relationship manager (CRM) and email marketing manager | Apparel and fashion | $229 million | 420,000 |
| Senior ecommerce manager, retention | Consumer goods | $120 million | 1,800,000 |
| Retention marketing manager | Apparel and fashion | $5 million | 400,000 |
| Senior lifecycle marketing manager | Consumer goods | $130 million | 700,000 |
| Head of customer retention | Consumer goods | $100 million | 4,900,000 |
| Senior retention marketing manager | Consumer goods | $250 million | 2,000,000 |
| DTC marketing director | Beauty | $25 million | 170,000 |
Although the interviewees’ organizations had significant financial investments in email and SMS marketing, they could not get a full, single view of customer engagement and revenue opportunities.
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that could:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the eight Klaviyo customers, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. [The composite organization is a global ecommerce company with $150+ million in annual revenue. Before implementing Klaviyo, it had 1.4 million profiles in its legacy email service provider (ESP) and used a different provider to address their SMS needs. Each year, the composite organization sends over 145 million email messages to its active customer profile list and 24 million SMSs to its customers via their mobile devices. Their average order value is $175, and it has a 10% net profit margin.]
Deployment characteristics. [The composite organization implements Klaviyo over the course of two months and needs an additional four weeks for the IP warming process. Its internal team is composed of one email marketing manager, two graphic designers, and one developer to help implement and maintain the system. Moreover, since the composite organization is an enterprise business, it opts to have additional onboarding support from a third-party agency, incurring a one-time $70,000 for the support during migration. By using Klaviyo for both their email marketing and SMS channels, the composite organization gains access to a more unified view of their customer engagement data. The interviewees can optimize customer journeys across multiple channels and receive reports on performance.]
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Profit growth from improved email conversion rates | $106,124 | $765,231 | $1,669,068 | $2,540,424 | $1,982,895 |
| Btr | Business growth from net new email subscribers | $64,974 | $422,128 | $835,728 | $1,322,830 | $1,035,828 |
| Ctr | Profit growth from improved SMS conversion rates | $81,270 | $84,521 | $87,902 | $253,6933 | $209,776 |
| Dtr | Value of automated retention emails | $117,000 | $361,530 | $620,638 | $1,099,168 | $871,443 |
| Etr | Email marketing manager efficiencies | $7,178 | $7,079 | $6980 | $21,636 | $17,619 |
| Ftr | Developer and graphic designer efficiencies | $157,713 | $157,713 | $157,713 | $473,139 | $392,209 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $534,259 | $1,798,202 | $3,3378,029 | $5,710,489 | $4,509,762 |
Evidence and data. Email marketers interviewed for this study shared that, after implementing Klaviyo and gaining granular access to both real-time and historic data, they could create very robust segmentation and automation sequences to target their current customers with the right message at the right time. As a result, the interviewees’ organizations grew profits.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The ability to see an increase in incremental profit on existing profiles due to improved conversion rates through the deployment of Klaviyo can vary across organizations due to differences in:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Number of named profiles in existing portfolio | Assumption | 1,400,000 | 1,470,000 | 1,543,500 |
| A2 | Percentage of active profiles | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| A3 | Messages sent to active customers annually | A1*A2*4*52 | 145,600,000 | 152,880,000 | 160,524,000 |
| A4 | Open rate in prior environment | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| A5 | Clickthrough rate in prior environment | Interviews | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| A6 | Place order rate in prior environment | Interviews | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| A7 | Average order value | Interviews | $175 | $175 | $175 |
| A8 | Net profit margin | Assumption | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| A9 | Subtotal: Profit from existing profiles in prior environment | A3*A4*A5*A6*A7*A8 | $2,548 | $2,675 | $2,809 |
| A10 | Open rate with Klaviyo | Interviews | 25% | 30% | 35% |
| A11 | Clickthrough rate with Klaviyo | Interviews | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| A12 | Place order rate with Klaviyo | Interviews | 1% | 5% | 8% |
| A13 | Subtotal: Profit from existing profiles with Klaviyo | A3*A7*A8*A10*A11*A12 | $127,400 | $902,948 | $1,966,419 |
| At | Profit growth from improved email conversion rates | A13-A9 | $124,852 | $900,272 | $1,963,610 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||
| Atr | Profit growth from improved email conversion rates (risk-adjusted) | $106,124 | $765,231 | $1,669,068 | |
| Three-year total: $2,540,424 | Three-year present value: $1,982,895 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that Klaviyo’s forms and triggered pop-ups helped them build their audience list and acquisition of new customers. Forrester gathered the following information from the interviewees:
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The ability to see an increase in incremental profit on net new customer profiles through the deployment of Klaviyo can vary across organizations due to differences in:
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Percentage of new customers increase with Klaviyo | Interviews | 60% | 55% | 50% |
| B2 | Net new customers with Klaviyo | A1*B1 | 840,000 | 808,500 | 771,750 |
| B3 | Percentage of active profiles | A2 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| B4 | Messages sent to new active customers | B2*B3*4*52 | 87,360,000 | 84,084,000 | 80,262,000 |
| B5 | Open rate with Klaviyo | A10 | 25% | 30% | 35% |
| B6 | Clickthrough rate with Klaviyo | A11 | 2.0% | 2.3% | 2.5% |
| B7 | Place order rate with Klaviyo | A12 | 1% | 5% | 8% |
| B8 | Average order value | A7 | $175 | $175 | $175 |
| B9 | Net profit margin | A8 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Bt | Business growth from net new email subscribers | B4*B5*B6*B7*B8* B9 | $76,440 | $496,621 | $983,210 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||
| Btr | Business growth from net new customers (risk-adjusted) | $64,974 | $422,128 | $835,728 | |
| Three-year total: $1,322,830 | Three-year present value: $1,035,828 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees whose organizations used Klaviyo for targeted messaging and behavioral triggers with SMS saw profit growth through the channel. Moreover, interviewees who used Klaviyo for email and SMS appreciated the ability to optimize across channels and have data consolidated in one place. Communicating on the customers’ preferred channels avoided duplicative messaging on overlapping silos.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The ability to see an increase in incremental profit with SMS through the deployment of Klaviyo can vary across organizations due to differences in:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $210,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Number of SMS messages sent a year | Composite | 24,000,000 | 24,960,000 | 25,958,400 |
| C2 | Clickthrough rate in the prior environment | Interviews | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| C3 | Place order rate in the prior environment | Interviews | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| C4 | Average order value | A7 | $175 | $175 | $175 |
| C5 | Net profit margin | A8 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| C6 | Subtotal: Profit from existing profiles in prior environment | C1*C2*C3*C4*C5 | $42,000 | $43,680 | $45,427 |
| C7 | Increase in clickthrough rate on SMS with Klaviyo | Interviews | 150% | 150% | 150% |
| C8 | Increase in place order rate on SMS with Klaviyo | Interviews | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| C9 | Clickthrough rate with Klaviyo | C2*(1+C7) | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| C10 | Place order rate with Klaviyo | C3*(1+C8) | 0.63% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
| C11 | Subtotal: Profit from existing profiles with Klaviyo | C1*C9*C10*C4*C5 | $132,300 | $137,592 | $143,096 |
| Ct | Profit growth from improved SMS conversion rates | C11-C6 | $90,300 | $93,912 | $97,669 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Ctr | Profit growth from improved SMS conversion rates (risk-adjusted) | $81,270 | $84,521 | $87,902 | |
| Three-year total: $253,693 | Three-year present value: $209,776 | ||||
Evidence and data. Klaviyo highlights which email templates have a higher propensity to convert customers to upsell and cross-sell purchases — thus enabling interviewees to apply better targeting to achieve additional conversions. Moreover, according to the interviewees, Klaviyo improved customer churn and thus customer retention as the triggered emails matched with customers’ behavioral preferences.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The ability to see an increase in incremental profit on automation retention emails through the deployment of Klaviyo can vary across organizations due to differences in:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $871,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Number of automations before Klaviyo | Interviews | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| D2 | Number of automations after Klaviyo | Interviews | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| D3 | Average value of an automation per week | Interviews | $25,000 | $25,750 | $26,523 |
| D4 | Value of automations with Klaviyo | (D2-D1)*D3*52 | $1,300,000 | $4,017,000 | $6,895,980 |
| D5 | Net profit margin | A8 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Dt | Value of automated retention emails | D4*D5 | $130,000 | $401,700 | $689,598 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Dtr | Value of automated retention emails (risk-adjusted) | $117,000 | $361,530 | $689,598 | |
| Three-year total: $1,099,168 | Three-year present value: $871,443 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees unanimously shared how their respective email marketing teams gained efficiencies in their daily workflows with Klaviyo. This allowed for more time dedicated to strategy and planning. Teams saved time when building and maintaining both campaigns and flow emails through the use of the content library and stored template features. Furthermore, given the platform’s ability to track data across email marketing activity, interviewees shared time savings related to reporting key metrics across the organization.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The ability to see email marketing manager efficiencies through the deployment of Klaviyo can vary across organizations due to differences in:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $17,600.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Number of hours dedicated to weekly reporting in the prior environment annually | 2*49 | 98 | 98 | 98 |
| E2 | Number of hours dedicated to weekly reporting with Klaviyo | 0.5*49 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| E3 | Number of hours dedicated to monthly reporting in the prior environment | 8*12 | 96 | 96 | 96 |
| E4 | Number of hours dedicated to monthly reporting with Klaviyo | 4*12 | 48 | 48 | 48 |
| E5 | Average fully burdened hourly rate of an email marketing manager | TEI standard | $55 | $55 | $55 |
| E6 | Subtotal: Reporting labor savings with Klaviyo | ((E1-E2)+(E3-E4 ))*E5 | $ 6,655 | $6,655 | $6,655 |
| E7 | Hours per week dedicated to building campaigns, building and maintaining flows, etc. by the email marketing manager in prior environment | Interviews | 32 | 32 | 32 |
| E8 | Hours per week dedicated to building campaigns, building and maintaining flows, etc. by the email marketing manager with Klaviyo | Interviews | 8 | 10 | 12 |
| E9 | Subtotal: Email marketing manager efficiencies gained with Klaviyo | (E7-E8)*E5 | $1,320 | $1,210 | $1,100 |
| Et | Email marketing manager efficiencies | E6+E9 | $7,975 | $7,865 | $7,9576 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Etr | Email marketing manager efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $7,279 | $7,865 | $7,755 | |
| Three-year total: $21,236 | Three-year present value: $17,619 | ||||
Evidence and data. In addition to the marketing team, interviewees shared that their development and design teams realized efficiencies and were able to decrease reliance on third-party agencies to supplement their teams’ work. This is a result of Klaviyo’s API functionality and accessibility for non-developers to engage with the platform without waiting for team members to customize technical aspects of the platform.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The ability to see internal cost savings in graphic designer and developer labor through the deployment of Klaviyo can vary across organizations due to differences in:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $392,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Number of graphic designers in the prior environment | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| F2 | Average fully burdened salary per graphic designer | Composite | $87,750 | $87,750 | $87,750 |
| F3 | Percentage of time dedicated to Klaviyo | Interviews | 15% | 15% | 15% |
| F4 | Subtotal: Cost savings in avoided graphic designer spend | (F1*F2) - (F1*F2*F3) | $149,175 | $149,175 | $149,175 |
| F5 | Number of developers | Composite | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| F6 | Percentage of time dedicated by developer in prior environment | Interviews | 45% | 45% | 45% |
| F7 | Percentage in reduction in effort with Klaviyo | Interviews | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| F8 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a developer | Composite | $175,500 | $175,500 | $175,500 |
| F9 | Subtotal: Cost reduction for development labor | F5*F6*F7*F8 | $26,062 | $26,062 | $26,062 |
| Ft | Developer and graphic designer efficiencies | F4+F9 | $175,237 | $175,237 | $175,237 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Ftr | Developer and graphic designer efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $157,713 | $157,713 | $157,713 | |
| Three-year total: $473,139 | Three-year present value: $392,209 | ||||
Additional benefits that customers experienced but were not able to quantify include:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Klaviyo and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gtr | Klaviyo licensing fees | $0 | $339,660 | $352,296 | $365,231 | $1,057,187 | $874,339 |
| Htr | Implementation and internal labor costs | $130,460 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $130,460 | $130,460 |
| Itr | Ongoing management and training costs | $0 | $148,948 | $148,948 | $148,948 | $446,843 | $370,411 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $130460 | $488,608 | $501,244 | $514,179 | $1,634,490 | $1,375,210 |
Evidence and data. The interviewees explained their organizations paid a fixed monthly rate based on their profile, email, and SMS consumption. The annual Klaviyo platform fee included:
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The Klaviyo platform licensing fees may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $874,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Annual Klaviyo profile and email fees | Composite | $0 | $124,800 | $129,480 | $134,160 |
| G2 | Annual Klaviyo SMS fees | Composite | $0 | $170,182 | $176,989 | $184,068 |
| G3 | Klaviyo SMS short code | Composite | $0 | $13,800 | $13,800 | $13,800 |
| Gt | Annual Klaviyo fees | G1+G2+G3 | $0 | $308,782 | $320,269 | $332,028 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Gtr | Annual Klaviyo fees (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $339,660 | $352,296 | $365,231 | |
| Three-year total: $1,057,187 | Three-year present value: $874,339 | |||||
Evidence and data. The composite organization implements Klaviyo over the course of two months, with an additional four weeks needed for the IP warming process. Its internal team is composed of one email marketing manager, two graphic designers, and one developer to help implement and maintain the system. Since the composite organization is an enterprise business, it opts to have additional onboarding support from a third-party agency, paying a one-time $70,000 fee.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The Klaviyo implementation and internal labor costs may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $130,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Third-party professional services fee for implementation support | Composite | $70,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| H2 | Length of implementation (weeks) | Interviews | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| H3 | Number of email marketing managers working on implementation | Interviews | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| H4 | Percentage of time dedicated to implementation by an email marketing manager | Interviews | 85% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| H5 | Fully burdened salary of an email marketing manager | TEI standard | $114,750 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| H6 | Number of designers working on implementation | Interviews | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| H7 | Percentage of time dedicated to implementation by graphic designers | Interviews | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| H8 | Fully burdened salary of a graphic designer | F2 | $87,750 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| H9 | Subtotal: Internal labor cost for implementation | (H2*H3*H4*(H5/52)) + (H2*H6*H7*(H8/52) | $28,506 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| H10 | Length of IP warming process | Interviews | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| H11 | Percentage of time dedicated by personnel for IP warming process | Interviews | 90% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| H12 | Subtotal: Internal labor cost for IP warming process | (H10*H3*H11*(H5/52)) + (H10*H6*H11*(H8/52) | $20,094 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Ht | Implementation and internal labor costs | H1+H9+H12 | $118,600 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Htr | Implementation and internal labor costs (risk-adjusted) | $130,460 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| Three-year total: $130,460 | Three-year present value: $130,460 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that once their organizations set up Klaviyo, the email marketing manager would use it to create new flows and monitor performance. With the efficiencies gained in Klaviyo, the interviewees’ organizations needed less time from dedicated graphic designers for support and only had a developer trained as a contingency plan.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis, Forrester made the following assumptions:
Risks. The Klaviyo ongoing management and training costs may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $370,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | Number of email marketing managers dedicated to ongoing management | Interviews | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| I2 | Percentage of time dedicated by email marketing manager | Interviews | 0% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
| I3 | Fully burdened salary of an email marketing manager | H5 | $0 | $114,750 | $114,750 | $114,750 |
| I4 | Number of graphic designers dedicated to email creation | Interviews | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| I5 | Percentage of time dedicated by graphic designers | Interviews | 0% | 30% | 30% | 30% |
| I6 | Fully burdened salary of a designer | F2 | $0 | $87,750 | $87,750 | $87,750 |
| I7 | Subtotal: Ongoing management costs | (I1*I2*I3)+ (I4*I5*I6) | $0 | $132,975 | $132,975 | $132,975 |
| I8 | Number of email marketing managers trained | Composite | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| I9 | Hours dedicated to Klaviyo training | Interviews | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| I10 | Hours dedicated by marketing manager to meeting with Klaviyo customer success team | Interviews | 0 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
| I11 | Fully burdened hourly salary of an email marketing manager | E5 | $0 | $55 | $55 | $55 |
| I12 | Number of graphic designers trained | Composite | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| I13 | Average fully burdened hourly salary of a graphic designer | TEI Standard | $0 | $42 | $42 | $42 |
| I14 | Hours dedicated to Klaviyo training | Composite | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| I15 | Number of developers trained | Composite | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| I16 | Average fully burdened salary of a developer | TEI Standard | $0 | $84 | $84 | $84 |
| I17 | Hours dedicated to Klaviyo training | Composite | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| I18 | Subtotal: Training costs | (I8*(I9+I10)*I1 1)+(I12*I13*I14 )+(I15*I16*I17) | $0 | $2,432 | $2,432 | $2,432 |
| It | Ongoing management and training costs | I7+I18 | $0 | $135,407 | $135,407 | $135,407 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Itr | Management and training costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $148,948 | $148,948 | $148,948 | |
| Three-year total: $446,843 | Three-year present value: $370,411 | |||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($130,460) | ($488,608) | ($501,244) | ($514,179) | ($1,634,490) | ($1,375,210) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $534,259 | $1,798,202 | $3,378,017 | $5,710,478 | $4,509,762 |
| Net benefits | ($130,460) | $45,651 | $1,296,958 | $2,863,839 | $4,075,988 | $3,134,552 |
| ROI | 228% | |||||
| Payback period (months) | 13.0 |
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
1Source: “Best Practices: Cross-Channel Campaign Management For Retailers,” Forrester Research, Inc., March 31, 2022.
2Source: “Lifecycle Revenue Marketing Is The Future Of Frontline Growth For B2B Organizations,” Forrester Research, Inc., January 19, 2023.
3Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.