Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Insight’s Flex For Devices

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Insight’s Flex For Devices

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Insight, AUGUST 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Insight’s Flex For Devices

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Insight’s Flex For Devices

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Insight, AUGUST 2026

Forrester Print Hero Background
T
B
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Technology leaders must support increasingly complex IT infrastructure that enables and drives business. Infrastructure outsourcing services enable enterprise organizations to hand off the complexities of IT infrastructure management to specialists and focus on their core business capabilities. These services provide consistent, reliable, and scalable IT infrastructure management and address the complexity of regional and local requirements1.

Insight is a global IT solutions integrator that helps organizations modernize and manage technology environments by combining hardware, software, and services into integrated solutions that drive digital transformation. Insight’s Flex for Devices delivers endtoend device lifecycle management  — including procurement, deployment, support, and refresh  — through a single subscription model, reducing complexity, improving predictability, and lowering the total cost of ownership. Insight’s Flex for Devices addresses common IT challenges such as unpredictable costs, manual processes, asset visibility gaps, and device downtime by using automation, near-realtime tracking, and bundled lifecycle services to improve operational efficiency and employee experience.

Insight commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Flex for Devices.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Flex for Devices on their organizations.

Key Statistics

144%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$2.8M

Benefits PV 

$1.6M

Net present value (NPV) 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers from three different organizations with experience using Flex for Devices and also conducted six online interviews. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a global organization with $500 million in annual revenue and has 4,000 employees with a mix of Windows and macOS devices.

Interviewees mentioned that before using Flex for Devices, their organizations depended on manual, disjointed approaches to device lifecycle management that struggled to scale with organizational growth and distributed work models. Before working with Insight, interviewees faced time-intensive provisioning and logistics processes, limited visibility into device inventory and lifecycle status, inconsistent asset recovery, and excess inventory buffers to manage uncertainty. These limitations led to operational inefficiencies, high support burden on IT teams, increased device loss and overprovisioning, and delayed device delivery that constrained employee productivity.

After the investment in Flex for Devices, the interviewees’ organizations centralized and automated device lifecycle operations through a managed, endtoend solution that improved visibility, streamlined fulfillment, and standardized recovery and support processes. Key results from the investment include reduced manual effort and IT workload, faster device delivery and replacement with lower employee downtime, elimination of extended warranty costs, improved asset recovery and inventory optimization, and the ability to extend device lifecycles through better data and asset management.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Fifty percent reduction in IT labor required for device lifecycle management. The composite organization redeploys 50% of three FTEs’ time by eliminating manual provisioning, logistics, and asset management activities, enabling IT to focus on higher-value initiatives.

  • Fifty percent reduction in end-user device downtime. The composite organization decreases average downtime from 48 hours to 24 hours for new hires and replacement devices, allowing employees to resume work faster and improving overall productivity.

  • Elimination of OEM warranty costs totaling $300 per device. The composite organization replaces extended warranty purchases with Insight-managed repair and replacement services, avoiding approximately $300 in warranty cost per device while maintaining service levels.

  • Six- to 12-month extended device lifecycle. The composite organization uses improved visibility into device health and performance to extend device lifespans, reducing unnecessary refresh purchases and improving asset utilization.

  • Increase from 70% to 98% in device recovery rates and decrease in excess inventory from 10% to 3%. The composite organization increases recovery rates and reduces buffer stock, lowering capital tied up in unused devices and avoiding new hardware purchases.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Elimination of internal warehousing and logistics overhead. The composite organization offloads device storage, packaging, and shipping activities to Insight, reducing operational burden and freeing IT resources from noncore logistics tasks.

  • Improved compliance and reduced risk exposure. The composite organization standardizes device provisioning and lifecycle management, enabling greater control over software usage, improving audit readiness, and reducing the risk of noncompliance.

  • Greater standardization of device provisioning and configurations. The composite enforces consistent device bundles across user groups, reducing variability, improving support efficiency, and minimizing provisioning errors.

  • Improved sustainability, asset governance, and financial visibility. The composite standardizes device recycling and disposition, improving auditability, ensuring secure asset retirement, and increasing transparency into asset lifecycle and financial outcomes.

Quantified costs. Quantified costs for the composite organization include:

  • Subscription cost of $7 per device per month for device lifecycle management. The composite organization pays a per-device, per-month fee to Insight for end-to-end lifecycle services across 4,000 devices, totaling approximately $1 million in PV costs over three years.

  • Ongoing internal labor for implementation and program management. The composite organization incurs upfront and ongoing staffing costs to support implementation and oversee the solution, totaling approximately $138,000 over three years.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $2.8M over three years versus costs of $1.1 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $1.6 million and an ROI of 144%.

10% to 3% of total fleet

Reduction in excess device inventory

“It feels like Insight is a department of ours. It doesn’t feel like it’s a third-party vendor. The relationship there has been great.”

Senior IT manager, pet insurance

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
IT efficiency gains End-user efficiency gains Warranty cost savings Savings from increased device lifecycle Cost savings from increased inventory control

Insight’s Flex For Devices Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Flex for Devices investment

Interviews

Role Industry Region Employees
Director of IT operations
Service desk manager
Knowledge management analyst
Staffing and recruiting North America 5,000+
Engineering manager Industrial automation North America 200+
Senior IT manager Pet insurance North America 1,500+
Six online interviews Various Various N/A

Key Challenges

Prior to adopting Insight’s Flex, interviewees described running device lifecycle, logistics, and endpoint management processes that were increasingly difficult to sustain as their organizations scaled and transitioned to distributed work environments. These challenges created operational inefficiencies, constrained IT capacity, and introduced risk across asset management and employee support.

Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges before investing in Flex for Devices, including:

  • Inability to scale device lifecycle operations with organizational growth. Interviewees reported that rapid workforce expansion — particularly during periods of hiring growth, acquisitions, and remote workforce transitions — outpaced their internal ability to manage devices. As headcount increased from hundreds to thousands of employees, existing IT processes lacked the capacity to support the growing demand for provisioning, shipping, and lifecycle management. The service desk manager at a staffing and recruiting organization described the situation directly. They said, “We were growing so fast that we just could not keep up with our demands and the amount of time to hire people.” Without a scalable model, organizations faced increasing pressure to either expand internal IT headcount or adopt an alternative approach to efficiently manage device operations.

  • Manual, time-consuming lifecycle and logistics processes. Prior to Insight’s Flex, core lifecycle activities — including imaging, provisioning, shipping, break/fix, and device preparation — were handled manually by internal IT teams. These processes required significant hands-on effort and often relied on ad hoc workflows and available office resources rather than structured, centralized systems. Interviewees highlighted the burden of these tasks on IT staff and their impact on productivity.

    • The senior IT manager at a pet insurance organization said: “Three of our IT staff spent at least half of their time imaging systems, getting them in, checking them, getting them back on the shelf, break fixing, calling Dell...easily 50% of their time.”
    • In many cases, IT personnel were responsible not only for technical setup but also for packaging, coordinating shipments, and physically delivering devices to carriers — further increasing operational overhead. The senior IT manager continued, “We’re not a logistics company, so we spend a lot of time getting a laptop ready and getting it shipped out.”

  • Low asset recovery rates and device losses. Interviewees indicated that device retrieval processes were inconsistent and difficult to enforce without centralized oversight. Before Insight’s Flex, organizations relied on manual tracking and informal processes to recover devices from departing employees, resulting in asset losses. The service desk manager at a staffing and recruiting organization said: “It was luck of the draw who sent it back. We had a significant loss of laptops here during that time. Before 2023, when we started using the Depot, it would have been a significant loss of laptops that people probably still had at their houses." Without reliable recovery processes, organizations faced unnecessary device purchases and reduced asset utilization.

  • Excess inventory and inefficient asset utilization. Due to uncertainty in retrieval rates and fulfillment timelines, organizations maintained excess inventory buffers to ensure they could support onboarding, replacements, and break/fix scenarios. This approach tied up capital in unused devices while still requiring additional purchases. A lack of visibility and control over inventory levels made it difficult to optimize hardware spend and manage lifecycle planning effectively.

  • Limited visibility into device inventory, status, and lifecycle. Interviewees reported that before Insight’s Flex, IT teams had limited insight into device location, condition, and lifecycle status. This lack of visibility hindered decision-making related to procurement, refresh cycles, and asset reuse. Without centralized reporting or asset-tracking systems, organizations relied on manual processes and incomplete data, thereby increasing both administrative burden and operational risk.

  • Need to support remote and distributed work models. As organizations transitioned to remote or hybrid work environments, traditional IT support models  — such as in-office provisioning and repair — became increasingly ineffective. Supporting geographically dispersed employees introduced new challenges in device delivery, replacement, and repair logistics. The engineering manager at an industrial automation organization noted the importance of enabling rapid, reliable device turnaround for remote employees, particularly in time-sensitive scenarios: “We have scenarios where our customer will demand personnel, and we’ll onboard on a Friday, and they’ll be on site on a Monday. We needed a company that could actually turn around devices in very short time frames.”

Solution Requirements/Investment Objectives

In response to these challenges, organizations sought a solution that could:

  • Scale device lifecycle operations without adding internal headcount.

  • Reduce manual effort across provisioning, shipping, and repair.

  • Improve asset recovery rates and reduce hardware loss.

  • Optimize inventory levels and reduce excess stock.

  • Provide centralized visibility into devices and lifecycle status.

  • Enable fast, reliable support for remote employees.

  • Free IT resources to focus on strategic initiatives.

These needs led interviewees to pursue Insight’s Flex as a managed, end-to-end solution for device lifecycle and logistics management.

“We did not have proper facilities to house the equipment. We wanted to exit the inventory business because we would need someone onsite with machines ready to go. We wanted to get out of the imaging business; somebody has to dedicate time to reimage a machine and get it ready. We also did not have separate imaging locations and could not image multiple devices at once, so the computers were sitting on somebody’s desk. They also had to manage a lot of additional overhead just from the shipping, receiving, and end-user management.”

Senior IT manager, pet insurance

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a midmarket enterprise with $500 million in annual revenue and 4,000 employees distributed across office, remote, and field environments. Its endpoint environment is evenly split between Windows and macOS devices. Prior to adopting Insight’s Flex, the organization followed a standardized three-year refresh cycle and purchased three-year, next-business-day warranties to support reliability. Despite this, it experienced persistent device performance issues, with approximately 5% of support tickets tied to endpoints. A lean IT team managed lifecycle operations with limited visibility into fleetwide inventory, utilization, and device health, while imaging complexity and support costs constrained device standardization.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization deploys Insight’s Flex across its full endpoint fleet following a short implementation period. The deployment supports both Windows and macOS devices and spans all employee types and locations. Insight’s Flex replaces manual lifecycle processes with managed provisioning, logistics, repair, and asset management services, integrated with internal systems to streamline ordering and fulfillment. The entire workforce is supported, enabling consistent device delivery, improved asset visibility, and scalable lifecycle management across the organization.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $500 million in annual revenue

  • 50% Windows and 50% macOS machines

  • 4,000 employees

  • Employees located in offices, remote, and in the field

  • Currently on a three-year refresh cadence

  • Currently purchased three-year, next-business-day warranty

  • High rate of tickets tied to device performance (5%)

  • Stuck on a couple devices due to support cost and imaging

  • Lean IT support

  • Limited view of entire fleet

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite

Total Benefits

Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr IT efficiency gains $194,400 $194,400 $194,400 $583,200 $483,444
Btr End-user efficiency gains $314,496 $314,496 $314,496 $943,488 $782,105
Ctr Warranty cost savings $360,180 $360,180 $360,180 $1,080,540 $895,714
Dtr Savings from increased device lifecycle $0 $0 $117,659 $117,659 $88,399
Etr Cost savings from increased inventory control $204,624 $204,624 $204,624 $613,872 $508,870
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $1,073,700 $1,073,700 $1,191,359 $3,338,759 $2,758,532

IT Efficiency Gains

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that before adopting Insight’s Flex, internal IT teams were responsible for a wide range of manual, time-intensive activities related to device lifecycle management, including imaging devices, provisioning and preparing hardware, coordinating shipments, managing break/fix processes, and tracking asset inventory. These activities required significant hands-on effort and consumed a substantial portion of the IT team’s capacity. As organizations scaled, handling device fulfillment, logistics, and break/fix became increasingly inefficient and difficult to sustain. Interviewees noted that supporting growth would have required hiring additional staff to manage these operational tasks. The director of IT operations at a staffing and recruiting organization said: “For all of our teams, endpoint management is an added responsibility. We don’t have three people who are just ordering, so this is on top of everybody’s job. If we were to do it ourselves, we would have to hire three people dedicated to doing this.”

After adopting Insight’s Flex, interviewees said that their organizations centralized and automated many of these activities through Insight’s managed services. They reported that ordering, provisioning, and fulfillment processes were highly streamlined, requiring minimal internal IT intervention. In some cases, device orders were fully automated through system integrations, eliminating manual handling. The senior IT manager at a pet insurance organization said: “Somebody opens a ticket for a new hire. Service now is integrated within Insight. There’s no human touching it on our side; it goes into Insight’s queue. As long as the device is in stock, it’s shipped out, and the ticket gets updated with all that information. From a help desk standpoint, it’s literally zero touch unless there’s something out of stock or a last-minute change has been made.”

As a result, IT teams significantly reduced the time spent on operational tasks and were able to focus on higher-value initiatives. Interviewees emphasized that staff previously dedicated to device management were redeployed to more strategic work, including cloud migration, virtualization, and end-user experience improvements. The senior IT manager at a pet insurance organization said: “Those same three people … are now working on larger projects … migrating stuff to the cloud … [and] M365 management.” In addition, interviewees highlighted productivity gains from eliminating time spent coordinating logistics and tracking orders. The senior IT manager said, “Once we established processes with Insight, orders and fulfillment proceeded with minimal oversight, allowing IT staff to focus on their core responsibilities.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite assigned three FTEs to handle asset management before Insight.

  • The fully burdened salary for the IT manager is $144,000 per year.

  • After Insight, three FTEs now dedicate 50% of their job to higher-value tasks rather than asset management.

Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:

  • The size of the organization.  

  • The number of FTEs who previously handled asset management.

  • The salary of the IT professional.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $483,000.             

3

Redeployed IT FTEs

“We’re pretty much a zero-touch entity with end-user compute. We’ve been able to redirect the IT staff who were previously doing this mundane task. Now, they’re advancing their IT careers because they’re doing virtualization in the cloud.”

Senior IT manager, pet insurance

IT Efficiency Gains

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 FTEs previously involved in asset management Interviews 3 3 3
A2 Fully burdened annual salary for an FTE Composite $144,000 $144,000 $144,000
A3 Percentage of time redeployed by Insight’s Flex Interviews 50% 50% 50%
At IT efficiency gains A1*A2*A3 $216,000 $216,000 $216,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Atr IT efficiency gains (risk-adjusted)   $194,400 $194,400 $194,400
Three-year total: $583,200 Three-year present value: $483,444

End-User Efficiency Gains

Evidence and data. Prior to adopting Insight’s Flex, interviewees reported that employees frequently experienced delays in receiving devices and extended downtime when devices failed. Manual fulfillment processes, inconsistent logistics, and reliance on internal IT teams or external vendors for provisioning and repair drove these issues. For new hires, device delivery timelines were less predictable, requiring coordination across internal teams and logistics providers. As organizations scaled and transitioned to distributed workforces, these delays created friction in onboarding and limited employees’ ability to begin work immediately.

Interviewees emphasized improvements in the onboarding experience after adopting Insight’s Flex, with devices consistently delivered ahead of employees’ first day. New hires were able to begin their work on schedule, reducing onboarding-related lost productivity.

The service desk manager at a staffing and recruiting organization reported significant reductions in end-user downtime due to device failures and replacements: “On average, employees could be down 48 hours, depending on whether we had a local technician and they could fix the issue or if we had a machine in stock and could swap them out. It wasn’t always guaranteed, and the user would be down a day and a half or two days.”

After adopting Insight’s Flex, interviewees’ organizations established a more standardized, responsive support model, enabling rapid device replacement and streamlined repair workflows. Interviewees reported that employees now receive replacement devices within approximately 24 hours, significantly reducing downtime. This improvement enables employees to resume work more quickly, minimizing productivity disruption and reducing the business impact of device-related issues.

In addition to repair scenarios, the IT service manager noted productivity gains from faster device access when employees change roles or require upgraded equipment. Previously, these requests required manual coordination and shipment processes; with Insight’s Flex, they are fulfilled more quickly and consistently. The senior IT manager at a pet insurance organization shared: “The user’s manager goes on, fills out a form, and 24 hours later, they have a new laptop, and not one person in our company has touched it. We have 100 scenarios a year where someone changes departments, gets a different laptop, or has a job function change.”

Overall, interviewees emphasized that faster fulfillment, reduced downtime, and improved predictability of device availability contributed to a more seamless and efficient end-user experience.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization experiences 12% turnover annually, which means they ship 480 devices each year.

  • Before Insight’s Flex, the composite employees experienced 48 hours or more of downtime while waiting for a replacement device.

  • After Insight’s Flex, the composite’s employees experience 24 hours of downtime.

  • The average fully burdened end-user salary for the composite is $52 per hour.

  • The composite experiences a 2% device repair rate, which totals 80 devices needing replacement per year.

  • Of the time saved from deploying Insight’s Flex, Forrester conservatively estimates that 50% is recaptured for work on other tasks and initiatives and is therefore included in the benefit calculation. 

Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:

  • The consistency of device delivery timelines prior to adopting Insight’s Flex.

  • The frequency and severity of device-related downtime events.

  • The proportion of employees impacted by onboarding delays or device failures.

  • The ability of employees to perform limited work on alternative devices during downtime.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $782,000.

50%

Improvement in employee productivity

“When HR provides the tracking number to the employee, they know when to expect that equipment, and it’s 99% of the time there before their first day, so they’re able to onboard without issue. The number of orders that get returned, rejected, or not accepted is way down. That new hire experience, especially in the last nine months, has been fabulous.”

Director of IT operations, staffing and recruiting

“[Insight’s had a] positive impact on the end-user experience, particularly during [our acquisition’s] integration because it introduced more structured device lifecycle management, improved endpoint visibility, and standardized support processes.”

Project manager, telecommunications (online interviewee)

End-User Efficiency Gains

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Devices being shipped to new hires E1*12% 480 480 480
B2 Downtime hours before Insight’s Flex Interviews 48 48 48
B3 Downtime hours after Insight’s Flex Interviews 24 24 24
B4 Average fully burdened hourly rate for an end user Composite $52 $52 $52
B5 Subtotal: Downtime reductions for new hires (B2-B3)*B1*B4 $599,040 $599,040 $599,040
B6 Total employees Composite 4,000 4,000 4,000
B7 Average number of repaired devices shipped B6*2% 80 80 80
B8 Subtotal: Downtime reductions for repaired devices (B7*(B2-B3)*B4) $99,840 $99,840 $99,840
B9 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
Bt End-user efficiency gains (B5+B8)*B98 $349,440 $349,440 $349,440
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Btr End-user efficiency gains (risk-adjusted)   $314,496 $314,496 $314,496
Three-year total: $943,488 Three-year present value: $782,105

Warranty Cost Savings

Evidence and data. Prior to adopting Insight’s Flex, interviewees reported purchasing extended OEM warranties to ensure repair coverage, representing a high cost despite relatively low device failure rates.

The senior IT manager at a pet insurance organization noted that his organization paid $300 per laptop for more than 2,000 devices: “Insight’s break/fix services allowed us not to have to carry that warranty on the laptops. Before, employees were either shipping their laptops to us, or if it was a remote worker and they were comfortable, we would send [an OEM] technician to their house who would troubleshoot their laptop.”

After adopting Insight’s Flex, organizations eliminated extended warranties and instead leveraged Insight’s depot and replacement services to manage repairs.

The senior IT manager at a pet insurance organization said this model maintained or improved service levels and improved employee experience. They said, “It limited the awkwardness of a stranger [the OEM technician] coming into their house.

Centralized repair and replacement workflows further simplified operations, with failed devices returned to Insight for diagnosis, repair, or reconditioning. As a result, interviewees’ organizations reduced both direct warranty spend and the complexity of managing OEM support processes.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization is on a three-year rolling device lifecycle before adopting Insight’s Flex, ordering 1,334 devices per year.

  • Previously, the composite paid $300 per device for the OEM warranty.

Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:

  • The degree to which organizations previously purchased extended warranties.

  • Variability in per-device warranty pricing.

  • Device failure rates and repair needs..

  • Organizational policies regarding risk tolerance and support coverage

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $896,000.

$360,180

Warranty spend saved per year

“The money that we saved by not having to buy Dell warranty pays for this service from Insight. So, we’re already ahead of the game.”

Senior IT manager, pet insurance

Warranty Cost Savings

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Total employees B6 4,000 4,000 4,000
C2 Total devices ordered per year Composite 1,334 1,334 1,334
C3 Avoided warranty cost per device Interviews $300 $300 $300
Ct Warranty cost savings C2*C3 $400,200 $400,200 $400,200
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ctr Warranty cost savings (risk-adjusted)   $360,180 $360,180 $360,180
Three-year total: $1,080,540 Three-year present value: $895,714

Savings From Increased Device Lifecycle

Evidence and data. Before adopting Insight’s Flex, many interviewees relied on standard three-year lifecycle policies for their device refresh decisions and often lacked visibility into the actual performance and condition of their devices. As a result, some devices were replaced too early, which negatively impacted overall asset utilization.

Once organizations implemented Insight’s Flex, they gained enhanced visibility into device health and performance metrics through advanced reporting and analytics. This improvement enabled interviewees to make more informed decisions regarding whether to repair, reissue, or replace their devices.

The director of IT operations described using these insights to extend device usage safely, We are frugal… 71% of our laptops… have exceeded their three-year warranty and are probably twice that old.”

In addition, Insight’s depot services allow organizations to evaluate returned devices, determine whether repair or replacement is more cost-effective, and recondition devices for continued use. This structured approach increases confidence in extending device lifecycles while maintaining performance standards. As a result, organizations can defer new device purchases and extract additional value from existing assets by extending device lifespans beyond typical refresh cycles.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization began deploying devices with Insight one year before the start of the three-year model.

  • The average blended cost of the PCs and Macs deployed is $1,400 per machine.

  • After Year 3, 78% of the value is depreciated.

  • After Year 4, 85% of the value is depreciated.

  • By Year 3 of the model, the composite uses 1,334 devices for an additional year saving $130,000.

Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:

  • Device performance requirements across user roles.

  • Organizational tolerance for extending refresh cycles.

  • Reliability of older devices and associated repair costs.

  • Accuracy and adoption of device health and performance insights.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $88,000.

1,334

Fewer devices ordered in Year 4

“Our weekly meetings with Insight, using their reporting, always remind us how many devices we have and if our stock is running low. We discuss returned laptops and, based on their condition and whether they’re out of warranty, decide whether to fix or dispose of them. We’ve worked out business rules and standards: light scuffing or surface damage to the cover — please reissue. That definitely extends the life and inventory numbers that we have available.”

Director of IT operations, staffing and recruiting

Savings From Increased Device Lifecycle

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Average cost per laptop Interviews $1,400 $1,400 $1,400
D2 Three-year depreciation Straight-line method (SLM) device depreciation guide 0% 0% 78%
D3 Four-year depreciation SLM device depreciation guide 0% 0% 85%
D4 Three-year cycle D1-(D1*D2) $0 $0 $308
D5 Four-year cycle D1-(D1*D3) $0 $0 $210
D6 Devices deployed four years earlier Composite 0 0 1,334
Dt Savings from increased device lifecycle (D4-D5)*D6 $0 $0 $130,732
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Dtr Savings from increased device lifecycle (risk-adjusted)   $0 $0 $117,659
Three-year total: $117,659 Three-year present value: $88,399

Cost Savings From Increased Inventory Control

Evidence and data. Before adopting Insight’s Flex, interviewees reported limited visibility into inventory and inconsistent device retrieval processes. As a result, organizations maintained excess buffer stock to support onboarding and replacements, while also incurring asset losses from unreturned devices. Retrieval rates were inconsistent and difficult to enforce, with the service desk manager at a staffing and recruiting organization estimating recovery rates of approximately 70% before Insight’s Flex. To mitigate these uncertainties, organizations carried excess inventory, tying up capital and reducing asset utilization. Interviewees also noted limited visibility into available stock, making it difficult to accurately forecast demand.

After adopting Insight’s Flex, organizations improved both inventory visibility and device retrieval rates through centralized tracking, standardized processes, and managed retrieval services. The director of IT operations at the staffing and recruiting organization reported that retrieval rates increased significantly, reaching 98%. Improved recovery rates increased the availability of reusable devices, reducing the need to purchase new hardware for onboarding and replacement. At the same time, enhanced inventory visibility and reporting allowed interviewees’ organizations to reduce excess stock and better align inventory with demand. Together, these improvements reduced both the number of idle devices held in inventory and the volume of new devices required to support operations.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Before Insight, the composite kept a supply of devices on hand that was equal to 10% of its total employees, or 400 devices.

  • After Insight, the composite reduces that supply to 3%, or 120 devices.

  • The total capital released is $392,000.

  • The cost of that capital is 10%, or $39,200.

  • The composite experiences 12% voluntary turnover each year.3

  • Before Insight, it was only able to retrieve 70% of the devices from departing employees.

  • After Insight, the composite is able to recover 98% of those devices.

  • The composite no longer needs to purchase 134 devices for new employees.

Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:

  • Baseline device retrieval rates prior to adoption.

  • The degree of improvement in retrieval and tracking processes.

  • Organizational policies regarding inventory buffers.

  • Workforce growth and device demand variability.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $509,000.

28%

Improvement in recovered devices

“With the combination of their advanced asset portal, the inventory reports that we get, the other reporting, and then these kinds of equipment bundles, there is a savings because we know exactly what we have when we need to order more. We’re not carrying extra inventory for months that we don’t need. And we’re issuing the right type of equipment to the right employee.”

Director of IT operations, staffing and recruiting

Cost Savings From Increased Inventory Control

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Total employees Composite 4,000 4,000 4,000
E2 Excess inventory kept on hand before Insight’s Flex E1*10% 400 400 400
E3 Excess inventory kept on hand after Insight’s Flex E1*3% 120 120 120
E4 Capital released (E2-E3)*D1 $392,000 $392,000 $392,000
E5 Cost of capital released E4*10% $39,200 $39,200 $39,200
E6 Subtotal: Reduced excess inventory E5 $39,200 $39,200 $39,200
E7 Percent voluntary turnover Mercer study 12% 12% 12%
E8 Percentage of devices retrieved before Insight’s Flex Interviews 70% 70% 70%
E9 Percentage of devices retrieved after Insight’s Flex Interviews 98% 98% 98%
E10 Devices retrieved before Insight’s Flex C1*E7*E8 336 336 336
E11 Devices retrieved after Insight’s Flex C1*E7*E9 470 470 470
E12 Devices no longer needing to be reordered new (rounded) E11-E10 134 134 134
E13 Subtotal: Avoided device purchases E12*D1 $188,160 $188,160 $188,160
Et Cost savings from increased inventory control E6+E13 $227,360 $227,360 $227,360
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Etr Cost savings from increased inventory control (risk-adjusted)   $204,624 $204,624 $204,624
Three-year total: $613,872 Three-year present value: $508,870

Unquantified Benefits

Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Reduced need for internal warehousing and logistics. Interviewees reported that Insight’s Flex eliminated the need for internal warehousing, inventory handling, and logistics management. Prior to adoption, IT teams were responsible for storing devices, packaging equipment, and coordinating shipments, requiring both physical space and staff effort. The senior IT manager_ at a pet insurance organization said, “We’re not a logistics company, so a lot of time [was] spent … getting a laptop ready and shipped out.” By shifting these responsibilities to Insight, the interviewees’ organizations reduced operational overhead and freed IT resources from noncore activities.

  • Improved compliance and reduced risk exposure. Interviewees reported that transitioning from a bring-your-own-device model to a corporate-managed device model improved compliance and reduced risk exposure across their organizations. Prior to adopting Insight’s Flex, device management was less controlled, increasing the likelihood of unmanaged or noncompliant software use. By standardizing device provisioning and lifecycle management, organizations ensured that all endpoints adhered to corporate policies and licensing requirements. This reduced risks associated with unauthorized or pirated software and improved audit readiness by ensuring that devices were properly tracked, configured, and maintained within centralized systems.

  • Greater standardization of device provisioning and configurations. Interviewees reported that standardized device bundles and approved configurations helped reduce ordering errors, prevent unnecessary purchases, and ensure employees received the appropriate hardware for their roles. The director of IT operations at a staffing and recruiting organization said, “Our predefined bundles prevent over-ordering, double-ordering, or ordering a model or device that we have not approved.” The composite enforces consistent device bundles and configurations across user groups, reducing variability, improving support efficiency, and minimizing errors associated with ad hoc provisioning.

  • Improved sustainability, asset governance, and financial visibility. Interviewees reported that Insight's asset disposition processes improved confidence in device retirement, enhanced tracking of retired assets, and provided documentation to support compliance and financial reporting requirements. The senior IT manager at a staffing and recruiting organization said: “We know that each device is securely being destroyed. We can take those machines off of our accounting books once they are completely destroyed.” The composite streamlines device disposition through standardized recycling and resale processes, enabling better tracking of retired assets, improving compliance through certificates of destruction, and increasing transparency into asset lifecycle outcomes.

“There were cases where we weren’t getting our software license back after an employee left, and we discovered that the employee may not have been using a legitimate license in the first place. From a compliance perspective, we took control and achieved insurance audit compliance by confirming that we hold all legitimate licenses and that nothing is pirated. Everything that we run on our company-owned machine is secure, safe, and legitimate.”

Senior IT manager, pet insurance

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Flex for Devices and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Ability to scale device lifecycle operations without incremental IT headcount. The composite supports future workforce growth, acquisitions, and distributed work models without proportional increases in IT staffing by leveraging a scalable, managed delivery model. The service desk manager  at a staffing and recruiting organization said: “The biggest dilemma for us was how many people to staff depending on how many devices had to go out that day. Bringing on Insight was the biggest help for us. If we took Insight out and tried to do this internally, it would become more of a full-time job for engineers.”

  • Flexibility to optimize sourcing strategies, including refurbished or alternative device procurement. The composite can leverage evolving sourcing models, including the reuse of returned devices and access to secondary markets, to further reduce hardware costs. The director of IT operations at the staffing and recruiting organization said: “We’re a frugal company, with the [hardware] market changes, so we are looking at every expense. If there were an opportunity to buy used equipment, we would consider it.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite

Total Costs

Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Ftr Fees paid to Insight $0 $403,200 $403,200 $403,200 $1,209,600 $1,002,699
Gtr Planning, implementation, and ongoing management costs $86,400 $17,280 $17,280 $17,280 $138,240 $129,373
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $86,400 $420,480 $420,480 $420,480 $1,347,840 $1,132,072

Fees Paid To Insight

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that Insight’s subscription-based pricing consolidated multiple device lifecycle management functions into a single, predictable cost, replacing activities previously handled internally or through separate vendors. Several interviewees indicated that the service’s value extended beyond device provisioning and support to include logistics, asset management, repair services, and lifecycle visibility, reducing operational complexity while enabling efficient use of IT resources.

The Flex for Devices calculation includes warehousing, provisioning, deployment, and sustainability services that manage the device lifecycle end-to-end, and data integration and automation to streamline ordering and event workflows. Also included are Advanced Asset Management and Lifecycle User Communication services that provide full visibility and automated management of the device lifecycle, and Device Performance Scoring which uses health data to help make smarter refresh decisions.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization deploys a 50:50 mix of 4,000 PC and Mac devices.

  • The composite pays $7 per device per month to Insight.

Risks. The impact of this cost may vary by organization depending on the following:

  • The size of the organization.

  • The number of users and configuration of devices.

  • The level of service required from Insight by the composite organization.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.2 million.

Fees Paid To Insight

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Total devices deployed Composite   4,000 4,000 4,000
F2 Monthly Flex for Devices pricing Insight   $7 $7 $7
Ft Fees paid to Insight F1*F2*12   $336,000 $336,000 $336,000
  Risk adjustment 20%        
Ftr Fees paid to Insight (risk-adjusted)   $0 $403,200 $403,200 $403,200
Three-year total: $1,209,600 Three-year present value: $1,002,699

Planning, Implementation, And Ongoing Management Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that implementing Insight’s Flex required initial internal effort to define device standards, align stakeholders, and integrate systems such as service management platforms. This effort was more significant for organizations transitioning from decentralized or manual approaches, including BYOD or internally managed logistics.

Following implementation, ongoing management requirements were minimal. IT teams primarily monitored vendor performance, reviewed reporting, and handled exceptions such as special requests or supply constraints. Day-to-day lifecycle activities — including provisioning, shipping, repair, and asset tracking — were managed by Insight. Interviewees emphasized that while ongoing effort was limited, maintaining program oversight remained important to ensure alignment with changing workforce needs and device requirements.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Two IT resources support planning and implementation.

  • Each resource dedicates 50% of their time over a six-month period.

  • After the initial planning period, one IT resource dedicates 10% of their time to ongoing management.

  • The fully burdened annual salary is $144,000.

Risks. The impact of this cost may vary by organization depending on the following:

  • Organizational complexity and starting maturity.

  • Integration requirements across internal systems.

  • IT resource capacity and expertise.

  • Degree of change management required.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $129,000.

Planning, Implementation, And Ongoing Management Costs

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Implementation staff involved Interviews 2 1 1 1
G2 Percent of time dedicated to implementation Interviews 50% 10% 10% 10%
G3 Planning, implementation, and ongoing management time (months) Composite 6 12 12 12
G4 Fully burdened monthly salary for an IT resource A2/12 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000
Gt Planning, implementation, and ongoing management costs G1*G2*G3*G4 $72,000 $14,400 $14,400 $14,400
  Risk adjustment 20%        
Gtr Planning, implementation, and ongoing management costs (risk-adjusted)   $86,400 $17,280 $17,280 $17,280
Three-year total: $138,240 Three-year present value: $129,373

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)

  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($86,400) ($420,480) ($420,480) ($420,480) ($1,347,840) ($1,132,072)
Total benefits $0 $1,073,700 $1,073,700 $1,191,359 $3,338,759 $2,758,532
Net benefits ($86,400) $653,220 $653,220 $770,879 $1,990,919 $1,626,460
ROI           144%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Flex for Devices.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Flex for Devices can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Insight stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Flex for Devices.

Interviews

Interviewed five decision-makers at three organizations and conducted six online interviews using Flex for Devices to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach

Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology

Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Source: The Infrastructure Outsourcing Services Landscape, Q1 2026, Forrester Research, Inc., January 13, 2026.

2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

3 Source: "2025 US Mercer Turnover Survey," Mercer, August 2025.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Insight and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Flex for Devices. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Flex for Devices based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Insight or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Insight and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Insight make no warranties of any kind.

Insight reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Insight provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Amy Harrison

Published

August 2026

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Insight’s Flex For Devices