Executive Summary
Organizations in highly regulated industries are under increasing pressure to balance customer experience, operational efficiency, and compliance requirements. As onboarding and know-your-customer (KYC) processes become more complex, organizations may find that manual processes, fragmented systems, and legacy applications limit their ability to scale, adapt, and deliver the experiences customers expect, prompting them to evaluate more integrated approaches to process orchestration and automation.
The Flowable Case Platform enables organizations to orchestrate, automate, and modernize business processes across people, systems, and data. By combining workflow automation, case management, and low-code development capabilities, organizations can streamline complex processes, improve visibility, and adapt more quickly to changing business and regulatory requirements.
Flowable commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying the Flowable Case Platform.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Platform on their organizations.
Key Statistics
169%
Return on investment (ROI)
CHF 3.5M
Benefits PV
CHF 2.2M
Net present value (NPV)
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed a decision-maker who has experience using the platform at their organization. Forrester used this experience to project a three-year financial analysis.
The interviewee said that prior to using Flowable, their organization supported business-critical processes with a combination of internally developed applications, manual workflows, and disconnected systems. This approach created operational inefficiencies, visibility limitations, and increased maintenance requirements while making it difficult to quickly adapt processes in response to changing business and regulatory requirements. The organization wanted to modernize and orchestrate customer onboarding and KYC processes and support future automation initiatives.
After deploying Flowable, the organization replaced fragmented workflows while redesigning and modernizing key business processes. The interviewee said automated workflows, visibility improvements, and more efficient information management reduced operational effort and improved the experience for employees and customers. The platform also established a foundation for future process automation initiatives and the gradual retirement of legacy applications.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Quantified benefits for the interviewee’s organization include:
-
Retail onboarding productivity savings. Before Flowable, employees spent an average of 3 hours handling each digital customer onboarding request. With the platform, the organization automates most onboarding activities and manages exceptions through guided workflows, reducing manual intervention to cases that typically require 15 to 30 minutes of effort. As a result, these employees spend less time on administrative processing and repetitive checks and more time supporting customers and other higher-value activities. These efficiency gains generate CHF 1.4 million in productivity savings over three years.
-
Additional operating profit from improved customer onboarding. Faster and more automated onboarding reduces friction throughout the organization’s customer journey, helping prospective customers complete onboarding processes more quickly and with fewer interruptions. By reducing customer drop-off and increasing the number of successfully onboarded customers, the organization saves CHF 739,000 in additional operating profit over three years.
-
Reduced training and onboarding efforts for developers and business users. Prior to Flowable, the organization’s developers required extensive onboarding to understand internally developed applications and custom processes. Flowable’s standardized development environment, low-code capabilities, and process-driven approach reduce the time developers require to become productive and make it easier to onboard new team members. In addition, guided workflows simplify adoption for employees, helping them to learn and use new processes more quickly. Together, these efficiencies generate CHF 563,000 in training-related savings over three years.
-
Reduced legacy system maintenance costs. Prior to Flowable, the organization relied on internally developed onboarding and workflow applications that required ongoing maintenance, support, and infrastructure management. As it migrates onboarding, KYC, and other business processes to Flowable, the organization gradually retires these legacy solutions. This reduces the amount of IT effort required and allows technical resources to focus on strategic initiatives and future innovation. These savings amount to CHF 427,000 over three years.
-
Retail KYC process productivity savings. Flowable replaces the organization’s static workflows, repetitive data entry, and email-based coordination with dynamic workflows, reusable customer information, and automated routing. As KYC adoption expands across the organization starting in Year 3, employees spend less time on administrative processing and more time on customer-facing and compliance activities, generating CHF 344,000 in productivity savings over three years.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the interviewee’s organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Optimized process design and modernization. The organization uses its Flowable implementation as an opportunity to rethink and modernize key business processes. The interviewee explained that standardizing activities, eliminating unnecessary process steps, and introducing more dynamic process orchestration improves process consistency while the organization becomes better positioned to adapt to changing business and regulatory requirements.
-
Improved document management and information access. The Flowable Case Platform centralizes customer information, documentation, workflows, and case history within a single system, which allows the organization to replace previously disjointed processes that relied on multiple applications, emails, and manual record keeping. The interviewee noted that employees have immediate access to the information they need, including historical customer data and supporting documents, which helps improve process consistency and reduces the effort required to locate or validate information. They added that this makes daily work more efficient and provides greater visibility into process status and history.
-
Strengthened auditability, traceability, and compliance. Flowable creates a complete record of onboarding and KYC activities, including approvals, workflow actions, supporting documents, and process history. The interviewee said this improves transparency across the organization and that the resulting audit trail supports regulatory compliance efforts that make it easier to demonstrate adherence to internal and external requirements.
-
Enhanced employee experience and productivity. The interviewee said employees no longer need to coordinate work across multiple systems, spreadsheets, and email chains to move cases forward. They explained that guided workflows automatically route tasks to the appropriate users and provide visibility into process status and next steps, reducing administrative burden, simplifying day-to-day work, and allowing employees to focus more on customer-facing and higher-value activities.
Quantified costs. Quantified costs for the interviewee’s organization include:
-
Flowable license fees. The organization pays annual licensing fees to Flowable based on platform adoption and the number of supported users and use cases. As the organization expands use of the platform across additional business functions and increases the number of supported users, license costs increase accordingly. These costs amount to CHF 716,000 over three years.
-
Platform and use case implementation costs. The organization invests resources to deploy the platform, establish governance and architecture foundations, and develop initial onboarding and KYC use cases. These costs include solution design, development, configuration, testing, and implementation activities required to bring new processes into production. The organization pays a total of CHF 411,000 over three years.
-
Training costs. The organization pays for training developers and business users as platform adoption expands and new onboarding, KYC, and document management use cases are deployed. In addition, eight developers complete external Flowable training programs in Years 1 and 3. These costs amount to CHF 161,000 over three years.
The financial analysis that is based on the interview found that the decision-maker’s organization experiences benefits of CHF 3.5 million over three years versus costs of CHF 1.3 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of CHF 2.2 million and an ROI of 169%.
CHF 1.4M
Productivity savings in retail onboarding
Benefits (Three-Year)
The Flowable Case Platform Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the Flowable Case Platform investment
Interviewee’s Organization
Forrester interviewed a decision-maker who has experience using the Flowable Case Platform at their organization. Their organization has the following characteristics:
-
Financial services organization.
-
Operates in Switzerland.
-
Employs approximately 2,100 employees.
-
Maintains a large internal IT organization.
Key Challenges
The interviewee said that prior to adopting Flowable, their organization relied on internally developed applications, manual activities, and disconnected workflows to support onboarding, KYC, and related business processes. As customer expectations, regulatory obligations, and process complexity increased, these legacy approaches became increasingly difficult to scale and maintain. The interviewee identified several key challenges, including:
-
Manual and fragmented customer onboarding processes. Digital onboarding required significant employee intervention, with staff often spending between 1 and 3 hours processing individual onboarding requests. The process relied heavily on manual reviews, email exchanges, and handoffs between teams, creating delays throughout the onboarding journey. In some cases, it could take up to 14 days to open an account, resulting in high customer drop-off rates, poor customer experience, and increased operational effort for employees.
-
Rigid workflow and duplicate data entry across the KYC process. The organization relied on static processes that required employees to repeatedly enter and validate customer information across multiple activities. Historical customer information could not always be used efficiently, creating duplicate work and increasing the effort required to complete KYC reviews and updates.
-
Limited visibility and traceability across business processes. The organization lacked an end-to-end view of onboarding and KYC activities. Process tracking, status monitoring, and validation activities were frequently handled through manual coordination and emails, making it difficult to trace decisions, monitor progress, and maintain comprehensive audit trails.
-
Limited agility due to siloed legacy applications. The organization relied on several custom-built solutions running on legacy technology stacks that were increasingly difficult to maintain and enhance. Making changes to business processes or introducing new functionality often required significant development effort, limiting the organization’s ability to quickly respond to changing business and regulatory requirements.
-
Increased difficulty meeting regulatory and compliance requirements. As customer onboarding and KYC processes became more complex, the organization needed stronger controls, improved auditability, and more consistent process execution. Manual workflows created additional compliance risks and made it more difficult to demonstrate adherence to regulatory requirements.
Solution Requirements
The interviewee’s organization searched for a solution that could:
-
Support on-premises deployment while aligning with security and regulatory requirements.
-
Begin with a proof of concept and scale across business processes over time.
-
Orchestrate complex workflows across people, systems, and departments.
-
Enable process changes with minimal development effort.
-
Serve as a strategic platform for automation and gradual replacement of legacy applications.
Use Case Description
The interviewee’s organization implemented Flowable as part of a broader process modernization initiative spanning customer onboarding KYC, and related business processes. Rather than replicating existing processes, the organization uses the deployment as an opportunity to redesign and standardize workflows, improve automation, and strengthen process governance across the customer lifecycle.
The initial deployment focuses on digital customer onboarding and KYC processes. The organization uses Flowable to automate task routing, approvals, data collection, and case management while integrating with existing systems and document repositories. Over time, the organization expands platform adoption to additional users and processes.
For this use case, Forrester has modeled benefits and costs over three years as the organization expands platform adoption, increases automation, and gradually retires internally developed workflow applications.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
-
Approximately 2,100 employees
-
15% of employees work in IT and 35% work in back-office functions
-
15% employee turnover rate
-
Phased Flowable deployment: POC (20 to 50 users) in Year 1, 50 to 100 users in Year 2, and enterprisewide deployment in Year 3
-
Migrates additional business processes to Flowable over time
-
Gradually retires internally developed onboarding and workflow applications as adoption expands
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data
Total Benefits
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Retail onboarding productivity savings | CHF 343,309 | CHF 686,618 | CHF 686,618 | CHF 1,716,545 | CHF 1,395,418 |
| Btr | Additional operating profit from improved customer onboarding | CHF 181,709 | CHF 363,854 | CHF 363,854 | CHF 909,418 | CHF 739,265 |
| Ctr | Training time savings | CHF 203,213 | CHF 226,703 | CHF 254,421 | CHF 684,337 | CHF 563,247 |
| Dtr | Reduced legacy system maintenance costs | CHF 0 | CHF 157,950 | CHF 394,875 | CHF 552,825 | CHF 427,213 |
| Etr | Retail KYC process productivity savings | CHF 0 | CHF 21,729 | CHF 434,565 | CHF 456,294 | CHF 344,453 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | CHF 728,230 | CHF 1,456,854 | CHF 2,134,334 | CHF 4,319,418 | CHF 3,469,596 |
Retail Onboarding Productivity Savings
Evidence and data. The interviewee said that prior to Flowable, their organization’s customer onboarding relied on a series of manual reviews, data validation activities, and handoffs between teams. Employees frequently coordinated onboarding activities through email and multiple internal systems, limiting visibility and increasing processing times. In some cases, customers waited up to 14 days to complete onboarding, which created operational inefficiencies and increased the risk of customer abandonment.
The organization used Flowable to redesign and modernize the onboarding process. This reduced the need for manual intervention and improved consistency and visibility across the onboarding journey. Following the deployment, most onboarding activities became automated, with employees primarily focused on exception handling. Activities that previously required hours of effort typically required between 15 and 30 minutes, allowing employees to focus on customer support and other higher-value activities.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
The organization has a customer base of 370,000.
-
The organization has an annual customer growth rate of 1.5%.
-
The organization processes 5,550 onboarding requests per year.
-
During Year 1, the organization realizes 50% of the benefit as it completes use case development, deployment, and user adoption activities before reaching full operational scale.
-
Prior to Flowable, employees spent an average of 3 hours processing each onboarding request.
-
Flowable automates approximately 85% of onboarding activities.
-
Onboarding requests that require employee intervention after deployment require 15 minutes of effort.
-
The average fully burdened hourly salary for a back-office employee is CHF 58.
-
The organization has an 80% productivity recapture rate.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
Existing level of onboarding automation.
-
Existing level of process maturity.
-
Complexity of onboarding requirements and regulatory controls.
-
Customer volumes.
-
Onboarding activity levels.
-
Adoption rates.
-
Percent of onboarding processes migrated to Flowable.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 1.4 million.
85%
Reduction in manual intervention during digital customer onboarding
Retail Onboarding Productivity Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Baseline customers | Interview | 370,000 | 370,000 | 370,000 | |
| A2 | Annual customer growth rate | Assumption | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | |
| A3 | Benefit realization rate | Interview | 50% | 100% | 100% | |
| A4 | Retail customer onboardings | A1*A2*A3 | 2,775 | 5,550 | 5,550 | |
| A5 | Average onboarding time before Flowable (hours) | Interview | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| A6 | Subtotal: Total onboarding time before Flowable (hours) | A4*A5 | 8,325 | 16,650 | 16,650 | |
| A7 | Reduction in manual intervention | Interview | 85% | 85% | 85% | |
| A8 | Average time per manual intervention with Flowable (hours) | Interview | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| A9 | Subtotal: Total onboarding time with Flowable (hours) | A4*(1-A7)*A8 | 104 | 208 | 208 | |
| A10 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a back-office employee | Assumption | CHF 58 | CHF 58 | CHF 58 | |
| A11 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| At | Retail onboarding productivity savings | (A6-A9)*A10*A11 | CHF 381,454 | CHF 762,909 | CHF 762,909 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Retail onboarding productivity savings (risk-adjusted) | CHF 343,309 | CHF 686,618 | CHF 686,618 | ||
| Three-year total: CHF 1,716,545 | Three-year present value: CHF 1,395,418 | |||||
Additional Operating Profit From Improved Customer Onboarding
Evidence and data. Prior to Flowable, the interviewee’s organization relied on manual reviews, email-based coordination, and multiple handoffs between teams for customer onboarding. Account opening could take up to 14 days in some cases, creating friction throughout the onboarding process and increasing the likelihood that prospective customers would abandon their applications before completion. As part of its onboarding initiative, the organization redesigned the onboarding journey and automated many of the underlying workflows. The interviewee reported this improved operational efficiency and customer experience, which they said helped lower customer dropout rates and led to a more seamless onboarding process.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Prior to Flowable, the customer abandonment rate during onboarding was 30%.
-
Flowable reduced onboarding-related customer abandonment by 50%.
-
The organization realizes additional value from customers who successfully complete onboarding.
-
The organization has an average operating profit of CHF 546 per customer.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
Existing onboarding performance.
-
Existing customer abandonment rates.
-
Customer acquisition volumes.
-
Variations in operating profit generated per customer.
-
The extent to which onboarding speed influences customer conversion rates.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 739,000.
50%
Reduction in customer drop-off during onboarding
Additional Operating Profit From Improved Customer Onboarding
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Customer drop-off rate before Flowable | Interview | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
| B2 | Customer drop-off rate reduction | Interview | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| B3 | Incremental customers retained | A4*(B1*B2) | 416 | 833 | 833 | |
| B4 | Operating profit per customer | Assumption | CHF 546 | CHF 546 | CHF 546 | |
| Bt | Additional operating profit from improved customer onboarding | B3*B4 | CHF 227,136 | CHF 454,818 | CHF 454,818 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Btr | Additional operating profit from improved customer onboarding (risk-adjusted) | CHF 181,709 | CHF 363,854 | CHF 363,854 | ||
| Three-year total: CHF 909,418 | Three-year present value: CHF 739,265 | |||||
Training Time Savings
Evidence and data. Before Flowable, the interviewee’s organization relied on multiple internally developed applications and legacy systems to support customer onboarding and KYC processes. Because these solutions were custom-built and often supported different stages of the process, new developers were required to learn several applications, workflows, integrations, and development approaches before they could effectively contribute. The interviewee noted that maintaining and evolving these applications became increasingly difficult as the organization modernized its operations.
Following the implementation of Flowable, developers worked in a more standardized development environment with common modeling standards and low-code capabilities. The interviewee noted that new team members were able to begin contributing to projects much faster than in the previous environment, with junior developers typically becoming productive within a month. This reduced onboarding effort and accelerated time to value.
The organization also experienced training efficiencies for business users. The interviewee noted that Flowable’s guided workflows and interfaces simplified process execution and reduced the amount of training required for employees participating in onboarding and KYC activities. They also said they expect these efficiencies to increase as additional use cases are deployed.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Prior to Flowable, the organization’s developer FTEs required 260 hours of onboarding and training before becoming fully productive.
-
Flowable reduces onboarding and training time for each developer to 68 hours.
-
The organization onboards and trains 14 new developers annually.
-
The average fully burdened hourly salary for a developer is CHF 84.
-
As licensing capacity expands to support additional use cases, the organization onboards and trains 50 new back-office employees in Year 2 and 109 back-office employees in Year 3.
-
The organization’s back-office training requirements decrease from 12 hours per employee to 3 hours per employee.
-
The average fully burdened hourly salary for a back-office employee is CHF 58.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
Existing developer skill sets.
-
Existing developer familiarity with process automation platforms.
-
Complexity of existing applications.
-
The number of new developers and business users who require training each year.
-
The pace of adoption across additional use cases and departments.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 563,000.
74%
Reduction in developer onboarding training effort
Training Time Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Developer training time before Flowable (hours) | Interview | 260 | 260 | 260 | |
| C2 | Developer training time with Flowable (hours) | Interview | 68 | 68 | 68 | |
| C3 | New developers who require onboarding and training | Assumption | 14 | 14 | 14 | |
| C4 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a developer | Assumption | CHF 84 | CHF 84 | CHF 84 | |
| C5 | Subtotal: Developer training efficiency savings | (C1-C2)*C3*C4 | CHF 225,792 | CHF 225,792 | CHF 225,792 | |
| C6 | Back-office training time before Flowable (hours) | Interview | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
| C7 | Back-office training time with Flowable (hours) | Interview | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| C8 | New back-office employees who require onboarding and training | Assumption | 0 | 50 | 109 | |
| C9 | Subtotal: Back-office training efficiency savings | (C6-C7)*C8*A10 | CHF 0 | CHF 26,100 | CHF 56,898 | |
| Ct | Training time savings | C5+C9 | CHF 225,792 | CHF 251,892 | CHF 282,690 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Training time savings (risk-adjusted) | CHF 203,213 | CHF 226,703 | CHF 254,421 | ||
| Three-year total: CHF 684,337 | Three-year present value: CHF 563,247 | |||||
Reduced Legacy System Maintenance Costs
Evidence and data. Before Flowable, the interviewee’s organization relied on several internally developed onboarding and workflow applications to support customer onboarding and related business processes. The interviewee noted that although these applications meet business requirements, they require ongoing maintenance and support from IT teams and have become increasingly difficult to evolve as business and regulatory requirements change.
The interviewee estimated that approximately five employees spend 50% of their time supporting custom-built applications, which is roughly the equivalent of 2.5 FTEs. They said they expect their organization to gradually retire these applications, which they believe would reduce maintenance requirements and allow technical resources to focus on new process automation initiatives rather than supporting aging siloed systems.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Prior to Flowable, approximately five IT employees spend 50% of their time supporting legacy systems, equivalent to 2.5 FTEs.
-
Legacy systems remain in use during the initial deployment phase; therefore, no legacy maintenance savings are realized in Year 1.
-
As processes are migrated to Flowable, the redeploys one IT FTE in Year 2 and 2.5 IT FTEs in Year 3 to higher-value activities.
-
The average fully burdened annual salary for an IT employee is CHF 175,000.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
The number of legacy systems being replaced.
-
The complexity of legacy systems being replaced.
-
Whether the organization replaces custom-built solutions or point solutions that have license costs and maintenance costs.
-
Internal maintenance requirements for existing applications.
-
The pace of Flowable adoption and migration across business processes.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 427,000.
2.5 FTEs
Equivalent amount of IT maintenance work no longer required after legacy-solution retirement
Reduced Legacy System Maintenance Costs
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | FTEs required to support legacy solutions | Interview | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | |
| D2 | Fully burdened annual salary for an IT employee | Assumption | CHF 175,500 | CHF 175,500 | CHF 175,500 | |
| Dt | Reduced legacy system maintenance costs | D1*D2 | CHF 0 | CHF 175,500 | CHF 438,750 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | Reduced legacy system maintenance costs (risk-adjusted) | CHF 0 | CHF 157,950 | CHF 394,875 | ||
| Three-year total: CHF 552,825 | Three-year present value: CHF 427,213 | |||||
Retail KYC Process Productivity Savings
Evidence and data. The interviewee’s organization previously relied on fragmented and largely manual workflows for KYC processes. Employees frequently needed to reenter customer information, navigate multiple siloed systems, and coordinate approval through email-based processes. The interviewee explained that workflows were largely static and often required employees to manually review and validate information spread across multiple systems.
Following the implementation of Flowable, the organization redesigned and modernized its KYC processes. It adopted a more dynamic, case-based approach that centralized customer information, automated task routing, and embedded controls directly into the workflow. Employees gained the ability to reuse information already collected during onboarding, which reduced duplicate work and improved process consistency.
The interviewee noted that most of the time needed for KYC reviews is often spent gathering information from customers and obtaining internal approvals. But they said by streamlining routing, validation, and information management, Flowable reduced administrative effort and allowed employees to focus on higher-value compliance and customer activities.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Approximately 15% of the organization’s retail customer base undergoes KYC review annually as part of ongoing regulatory and compliance requirements.
-
With Flowable, KYC processing effort is reduced by 20% in Years 1 and 2 and by 40% in Year 3 following full adoption.
-
Benefits are phased gradually, with no benefits realized in Year 1, partial realization in Year 2, and full realization in Year 3 to reflect platform rollout and user adoption.
-
The average fully burdened hourly salary for a back-office employee is CHF 58.
-
The organization has a 50% productivity recapture rate.
Risks. The scale of this benefit may vary from organization to organization based on:
-
Existing KYC processes
-
Level of automation for KYC processes.
-
Regulatory complexity.
-
Review requirements.
-
KYC review volumes.
-
KYC customer mix.
-
The pace of platform adoptions and workflow standards.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 344,000.
40%
Reduction in KYC processing effort in Year 3
Retail KYC Process Productivity Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Baseline customers | A1 | 370,000 | 370,000 | 370,000 | |
| E2 | Average time per retail KYC review (hours) | Assumption | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| E3 | Reduction in KYC processing time | Interview | 20% | 20% | 40% | |
| E4 | Retail KYC reviews | E1*15% | 55,500 | 55,500 | 55,500 | |
| E5 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| E6 | Benefit realization rate | Interview | 0% | 10% | 100% | |
| Et | Retail KYC process productivity savings | A10*E2*E3*E4*E5*E6 | CHF 0 | CHF 24,143 | CHF 482,850 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Etr | Retail KYC process productivity savings (risk-adjusted) | CHF 0 | CHF 21,729 | CHF 434,565 | ||
| Three-year total: CHF 456,294 | Three-year present value: CHF 344,453 | |||||
Unquantified Benefits
Benefits that provide value for the interviewee’s organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Optimized process design and modernization. The organization used its Flowable implementation as an opportunity to redesign and modernize customer onboarding and KYC processes. The interviewee said this enabled the organization to eliminate unnecessary process steps, standardize workflows, and introduce more flexible process management capabilities. As a result, the organization establishes a stronger foundation for future process improvements, helping ensure that business processes remain scalable, adaptable, and aligned with evolving customer and regulatory requirements. They also said having the ability to continuously optimize and modernize processes may create additional long-term value across the organization. To quantify this benefit, the organization would need to measure the time and cost savings associated with future process improvements.
-
Improved document management and information access. Prior to using Flowable, the organization’s customer information, documentation, and workflow activities were spread across multiple applications and processes, which often required employees to navigate different systems to locate information and understand case status. The interviewee said Flowable consolidated customer information, documentation, and case history within a single platform, improving visibility and reducing the effort required to access relevant information. They also noted that employees have all relevant information in one place, which makes it easier to review cases, understand historical activities, and maintain consistent processes while saving time and supporting better decision-making and collaboration across teams. To quantify this benefit, the organization would need to measure the time saved by locating and validating information.
-
Strengthened auditability, traceability, and compliance. The interviewee highlighted improved governance through oversight across onboarding and KYC processes following the implementation of Flowable. They said that by centralizing workflows, approvals, customer information, and supporting documentation, the platform creates a complete record of process activities and decisions that provides greater visibility into how cases are handled and enables employees to more easily track progress, validate actions, and demonstrate compliance with internal and external requirements. The resulting auditability reduces the effort associated with compliance reviews and investigations while helping the organization maintain consistency across regulated processes. The interviewee said they expect that as their organization migrates additional use cases to Flowable, these governance and compliance benefits could expand across a broader range of business processes. To quantify this benefit, the organization would need to measure reductions in compliance, audit, and investigation effort.
-
Enhanced employee experience and productivity. The interviewee said Flowable simplified day-to-day work for employees involved in onboarding, KYC processes, and document management. Previously, employees were required to coordinate activities through email, manually track workflow status, and move between multiple systems to complete individual tasks. The interviewee noted that Flowable automates task routing, provides visibility into process status, and guides employees through required activities, which allows employees to shift their focus from administrative and coordination activities to customer interactions, compliance reviews, and other higher-value work. They also emphasized that the platform made processes easier to execute and reduced operational complexity for business users. To quantify this benefit, the organization would need to measure improvements in employee productivity, satisfaction, or retention.
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement the Flowable Case Platform and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
-
Future process automation across additional business functions. The interviewee explained that onboarding and KYC were their organization’s only initial use cases. They said that as the organization gains experience with the platform, it plans to expand Flowable to additional business processes and gradually consolidate other workflow capabilities onto the platform. This may enable the organization to realize additional productivity, compliance, and application rationalization benefits beyond those quantified in this study.
-
Future AI-driven process automation and development acceleration. The organization initially adopts the Flowable Case Platform and upgrades to the Flowable Agentic Case Platform after Year 3. This may unlock additional opportunities to accelerate application development through Flowable AI Studio, automate more complex workflow activities, and realize fully autonomous process execution.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data
Total Costs
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | Annual license fees | CHF 0 | CHF 105,000 | CHF 178,500 | CHF 630,000 | CHF 913,500 | CHF 716,304 |
| Gtr | Platform and use case implementation costs | CHF 0 | CHF 275,352 | CHF 194,040 | CHF 0 | CHF 469,392 | CHF 410,684 |
| Htr | Training costs | CHF 0 | CHF 49,086 | CHF 38,306 | CHF 112,277 | CHF 199,670 | CHF 160,638 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | CHF 0 | CHF 429,438 | CHF 410,846 | CHF 742,277 | CHF 1,582,562 | CHF 1,287,626 |
Annual License Fees
Evidence and data. The interviewee’s organization incurred licensing costs for its use of the Flowable Case Platform and associated platform capabilities. As adoption expanded and additional use cases were deployed, the organization increased its licensing to support a broader set of users and processes. The interviewee indicated that licensing costs increased accordingly. Pricing may vary. Contact Flowable for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
The organization licenses Flowable for up to 50 business users in Year 1, 100 users in Year 2, and 2,000 users in Year 3.
-
It pays license fees of CHF 100,000 in Year 1, CHF 170,000 in Year 2, and CHF 600,000 in Year 3.
Risks. The impact of this cost may vary by organization depending on the following:
-
Number of users.
-
Deployment scope across business processes, which may require additional licenses or platform capabilities.
-
The organization’s deployment model (e.g., on-premises, cloud).
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 716,000.
Annual License Fees
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Annual license fees | Flowable | CHF0 | CHF100,000 | CHF 170,000 | CHF 600,000 |
| Ft | Annual license fees | E1 | CHF0 | CHF 100,000 | CHF 170,000 | CHF 600,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Ftr | Annual license fees (risk-adjusted) | CHF 0 | CHF 105,000 | CHF 178,500 | CHF 630,000 | |
| Three-year total: CHF 913,500 | Three-year present value: CHF 716,304 | |||||
Platform And Use Case Implementation Costs
Evidence and data. To deploy Flowable, the interviewee’s organization invested resources to establish the platform, configure integrations, and develop its initial onboarding and KYC use cases. The implementation included process redesign activities as part of the onboarding and KYC deployment.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Initial platform implementation requires six weeks of effort from 1.5 developers working 20 hours per week.
-
The first use case requires 20 weeks of effort from 3.5 developers working 40 hours per week.
-
The second use case requires 20 weeks of effort from 3.5 developers working 30 hours per week.
-
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a developer is CHF 84.
Risks. The impact of this cost may vary by organization depending on the following:
-
Complexity of the business processes to be automated.
-
Integration requirements with existing applications and systems.
-
Pace of platform expansion.
-
Number of use cases developed.
-
Level of process redesign required prior to implementation.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 411,000.
6 weeks
Time for platform implementation/setup
Platform And Use Case Implementation Costs
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Developers required for initial implementation | Interview | 1.5 | |||
| G2 | Initial implementation time (weeks) | Interview | 6 | |||
| G3 | Weekly time per developer for initial implementation (hours) | Interview | 20 | |||
| G4 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a developer | C4 | CHF 84 | |||
| G5 | Subtotal: Initial implementation costs | G1*G2*G3*G4 | CHF 15,120 | |||
| G6 | Developers required for use case creation | Interview | 3.5 | 3.5 | ||
| G7 | Time for use case creation (weeks) | interview | 20 | 20 | ||
| G8 | Weekly time for use case creation (hours) | Interview | 40 | 30 | ||
| G9 | Subtotal: Use case creation costs | G6*G7*G8*G4 | CHF 235,200 | CHF 176,400 | ||
| Gt | Platform and use case implementation costs | G5 + G9 | CHF 0 | CHF 250,320 | CHF 176,400 | CHF 0 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Gtr | Platform and use case implementation costs (risk-adjusted) | CHF 0 | CHF 275,352 | CHF 194,040 | CHF 0 | |
| Three-year total: CHF 469,392 | Three-year present value: CHF 410,684 | |||||
Training Costs
Evidence and data. The interviewee’s organization invested in training developers and business users to support the adoption of Flowable and associated business process changes. In addition to internal training activities, the organization invested in external instructor-led training provided by Flowable for selected developers to deepen technical expertise and support future platform development.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Five developers complete approximately 68 hours of Flowable training.
-
The organization invests in additional Flowable-provided training for eight developers in Years 1 and 3 to strengthen internal platform expertise.
-
In Years 1 and 2, 36 existing back-office employees receive training to support the rollout of onboarding and KYC use cases and new workflows.
-
As the organization expands its Flowable adoption, the number of existing employees requiring training increases to 365 in Year 3 (the equivalent of 50% of the back-office workforce).
-
Business users require approximately 3 hours of training to become familiar with Flowable and associated process changes.
Risks. The impact of this cost may vary by organization depending on the following:
-
Platform adoption rate.
-
The pace at which the organization deploys new use cases.
-
Organizational training requirements.
-
Change-management approach.
-
Employee turnover rate.
-
Workforce composition.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of CHF 161,000.
Training Costs
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Developers trained | Assumption | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| H2 | Developer training time (hours) | Interview | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| H3 | Cost of external training for developers | Flowable | CHF 0 | CHF 9,800 | CHF 0 | CHF 10,000 |
| H4 | Subtotal: Total developer training costs | H1*H2*G4+H3 | CHF 0 | CHF 38,360 | CHF 28,560 | CHF 38,560 |
| H5 | Back-office FTEs trained | Assumption | 0 | 36 | 36 | 365 |
| H6 | Back-office FTE training time (hours) | Interview | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| H7 | Hourly rate for a back-office FTE | A10 | CHF 58 | CHF 58 | CHF 58 | CHF 58 |
| H8 | Subtotal: Total back-office training costs | H5*H6*H7 | CHF 0 | CHF 6,264 | CHF 6,264 | CHF 63,510 |
| Ht | Training costs | H4+H8 | CHF 0 | CHF 44,624 | CHF 34,824 | CHF 102,070 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Htr | Training costs (risk-adjusted) | CHF 0 | CHF 49,086 | CHF 38,306 | CHF 112,277 | |
| Three-year total: CHF 199,670 | Three-year present value: CHF 160,638 | |||||
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | CHF 0 | CHF -429,438 | CHF -410,846 | CHF -742,277 | CHF -1,582,562 | CHF -1,287,626 |
| Total benefits | CHF 0 | CHF 728,230 | CHF 1,456,854 | CHF 2,134,334 | CHF 4,319,418 | CHF 3,469,596 |
| Net benefits | CHF 0 | CHF 298,792 | CHF 1,046,008 | CHF 1,392,057 | CHF 2,736,856 | CHF 2,181,970 |
| ROI | 169% |
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interview, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in the Flowable Case Platform.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that the platform can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Flowable stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to the Flowable Case Platform.
Interview
Interviewed a decision-maker with experience using the Flowable Case Platform at their organization to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interview using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewee.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Endnotes
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Flowable and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Platform. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Platform based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Flowable or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Flowable and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Flowable make no warranties of any kind.
Flowable reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Flowable provided the customer name for the interview but did not participate in the interview.
Consulting Team:
Emillianna Grootendorst
Published
August 2026