Executive Summary
Organizations use intranets as a foundational component of a broader digital workplace. Intranet platforms are used to generate content and communication; orchestrate its delivery to employees, often using personas or audience segmentation tools to ensure that relevance improves engagement; and track readership. Today’s intranets are shifting away from one-size-fits-all static walls of text and links to a more tailored approach that delivers information to employees’ preferred endpoints, such as mobile apps, team collaboration channels, or newsfeeds.1
Firstup is a workforce communications platform designed to help organizations deliver timely, targeted, and personalized messages to employees, including frontline and desk-based workers. It centralizes employee communications into a single system that integrates with existing enterprise tools to improve message reach, relevance, and engagement. By streamlining content creation, audience targeting, and delivery, Firstup addresses common challenges such as fragmented tools, manual processes, and limited visibility into communication effectiveness.
Firstup commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Firstup.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Firstup on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed eight decision-makers with experience using Firstup. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a global, multibillion-dollar enterprise with 6,000 frontline employees and 4,000 desk employees.
Interviewees said that prior to using Firstup, their organizations relied on a fragmented mix of email, intranet, and point communication tools to reach employees. However, prior attempts to improve communications yielded limited success, leaving them with manual processes, inconsistent audience targeting, and limited reach to frontline workers. These limitations led to delayed message delivery, low engagement, compliance risks, and a poor overall employee experience.
After the investment in Firstup, the interviewees centralized employee communications on a single platform that delivers timely, targeted, and personalized messaging across the workforce and includes comprehensive analytics. Key results from the investment include improved reach and engagement, particularly among frontline employees, along with measurable productivity gains, reduced turnover, lower operational risk, reduced safety incidents, and cost savings from retiring legacy communication tools.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
-
Communication initiatives supported by Firstup resulted in improved employee retention, including 52 skilled frontline employees. Prior to Firstup, the composite organization struggled to reach its frontline workforce consistently, contributing to a poor employee experience and higher turnover. With Firstup-enabled communication initiatives, engagement and connection between these employees and the corporate office improved, resulting in a 4% reduction in overall frontline turnover, equating to the retention of 52 highly skilled frontline employees. Over three years, the avoided costs associated with replacing these employees result in a total value of more than $4.7 million for the composite organization.
-
Employee communication efficiencies result in 69,000 hours saved. By centralizing communications and delivering targeted, role‑relevant, personalized messaging, Firstup reduces the time employees spend searching for information applicable to them. Frontline workers at the composite organization save approximately 6 hours per year, while desk-based employees save approximately 2 hours per year previously spent locating relevant communications. Over three years, these productivity gains are valued at more than $2.3 million for the composite organization.
-
Serious safety incidents decrease by 30% from improved communications. Firstup enables the organization to rapidly disseminate critical alerts and targeted safety communications, improving reach to the appropriate frontline audiences and supporting compliance objectives. As a result, the composite experiences a reduction in serious safety incidents of 20% in Year 1, 25% in Year 2, and 30% in Year 3 following deployment. Beyond measurable outcomes, the it sees meaningful impact in helping ensure employees can do their jobs and return home safely at the end of each day. Over three years, the avoided costs associated with fewer safety incidents and reduced risk exposure are valued at more than $1.1 million for the composite organization.
-
Communication efficiencies saving more than 12,000 hours on content creation. Prior to Firstup, the communications team at the composite relied on manual list building, IT support, and multiple disconnected tools to segment audiences and distribute messaging. With Firstup, communications staff productivity increases by 20% in Year 1, 25% in Year 2, and 30% in Year 3 as workflows became more automated and centralized. In addition, content creators across the organization save an estimated 8 hours per year due to easier publishing and reuse of targeted communications. Over three years, these communication efficiency gains result in more than 12,000 hours saved, valued at more than $533,000 for the composite organization.
-
Consolidating communications into one platform on Firstup enables legacy solution cost savings. Prior to Firstup, the composite organization relied on multiple disconnected tools to distribute communications, resulting in higher licensing costs and inefficiencies. By adopting Firstup as a comprehensive communications platform, the organization retires approximately $150,000 in annual costs associated with legacy solutions. Over three years, these consolidation-driven cost savings are valued at more than $336,000 for the composite organization.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Increased employee engagement and satisfaction. The composite experiences measurable improvements in engagement and satisfaction survey results following the Firstup implementation.
-
Improved strategic influence of communications teams. Firstup elevates communications roles from message delivery to strategic partnership. Access to targeting, insights, and analytics allowed teams to advise leaders on timing, relevance, and effectiveness rather than simply executing requests.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
-
Licensing costs. Firstup licensing costs are typically structured on a per user, per year basis and scale based on the size of the employee population and selected capabilities. Over three years, licensing costs total $1.4 million for the composite organization.
-
Planning, deployment, and change management. The composite completes deployment within a planned timeframe using Firstup’s standard configuration model and does not require significant custom development. Change management activities focus on driving adoption among communications teams and managers, with training, onboarding, and early use‑case validation helping accelerate time to value. These initial internal labor costs amount to $211,000 for the composite organization.
-
Ongoing management. Ongoing management includes the internal labor for day‑to‑day administration, such as user management, content updates, and basic configuration, which typically requires limited weekly time from existing communications or HR staff. Over three years, ongoing management costs amount to $219,000 for the composite organization.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $8.9 million over three years versus costs of $1.8 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $7.1 million and an ROI of 398%.
Number of skilled frontline employees retained with Firstup
52
Key Statistics
398%
Return on investment (ROI)
$8.9M
Benefits PV
$7.1M
Net present value (NPV)
<6 months
Payback
Benefits (Three-Year)
The Firstup Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the Firstup investment
Interviews
| Role | Industry | Region | Company Size | Frontline employee percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of colleague communications | Retail | HQ in UK, global operations | 300,000 employees $89.0B annual revenue |
80% |
| Corporate internal communications lead Global safety communications and culture lead |
Manufacturing | HQ in US, global operations | 95,000 employees $17.2B annual revenue |
50% |
| Director of employee communication and digital platforms | IT distribution | HQ in US, global operations | 25,000 employees $62.5B annual revenue |
10% |
| Chief innovation officer and physician | Healthcare | United States | 14,000 employees $2.3B annual revenue |
50% |
| VP of marketing and communications VP, people operations |
Healthcare | United States | 10,000 employees $1.4B annual revenue |
70% |
| Assistant director of communications and marketing operations | Healthcare | United States | 9,000 employees $1.7B annual revenue |
60% |
Key Challenges
Before implementing Firstup, interviewees described a highly fragmented employee communications environment built on a patchwork of disconnected tools and manual processes. Organizations relied heavily on email, basic intranets, point solutions for digital signage or mobile access, and manager‑mediated cascades to reach frontline workers.
Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
-
Communication gaps. Interviewees discussed how frontline employees often missed timely, relevant information due to scattered messages across fragmented channels. Communications felt generic or poorly timed, leaving workers disconnected from leadership and unaware of what truly mattered to their role.
The assistant director of communications and marketing operations at a healthcare organization used email as the primary communication channel before Firstup and did not know whether their messaging reached all employees. They commented: “Messages were sent to leaders and managers with the expectation that they would relay the information during meetings or huddles. There was no visibility into whether frontline staff actually received or understood the message, which meant we were often crossing our fingers and hoping critical information made it to the people who needed it most.”
-
Low employee engagement. Interviewees noted that communications were not personalized or inclusive in their prior environments, leading employees to feel overlooked and disconnected from company culture. This lack of relevance and recognition reduced motivation, trust, and overall engagement across the workforce.
The VP of marketing and communications at a healthcare organization discussed the lack of a mobile solution in their prior environment, making it difficult to reach frontline and clinical employees in real time with relevant messaging. The interviewee commented: “We also lacked the ability to segment our audiences, so most communications were sent to everyone regardless of role, location, or relevance. Just as importantly, there was no easy way for employees to engage back with us (e.g., no commenting, feedback, or interaction) which limited connection and transparency. We had little visibility into whether messages were resonating or even being seen by the people who needed them most.”
-
Information overload and missed critical updates. Interviewees said it was difficult for their employees to spot critical updates in their prior environment when they were flooded with emails, chats, and notifications every day. Important messages got buried in the noise, leading to missed actions, delays, and unnecessary confusion.
The director of employee communication and digital platforms at an IT distribution organization commented: “Before Firstup, employees struggled to find information because communications were delivered through scattered, one‑off email updates with no central place to reference or catch up. If someone missed an email or joined a conversation late, they had no easy way to recover critical context or confirm the latest guidance.”
-
Lack of integration and workflow efficiency. Interviewees highlighted a siloed intranet environment and disconnected communication tools that forced employees to jump between multiple systems to find information. This fragmented experience slowed work, increased friction, and reduced productivity, especially for frontline teams with limited time.
The corporate internal communications lead at a manufacturing organization discussed how content creators previously had to switch between four different point solutions to get their messaging across. They commented: “Before Firstup, content creators had to publish the same message separately in [point solution] for intranet content, [point solution] for email distribution, [point solution] for digital signage, and [point solution] for mobile communications. Each platform required different logins, formatting rules, publishing steps, and training, which resulted in significant duplication of effort, inconsistent messaging, and delays. This created friction for communicators, increased the likelihood of errors, and made it difficult to ensure that frontline and desk‑based employees were receiving the same, timely information across channels.”
-
Limited analytics and insight. Interviewees said that without clear, actionable analytics, their organizations struggled to understand whether communications were reaching and engaging employees. This lack of insight made it difficult to refine strategies, demonstrate impact, or continuously improve employee communications.
The corporate internal communications lead at a manufacturing organization discussed their past lack of visibility, commenting: “Before Firstup, metrics and reporting were dispersed across multiple platforms, each with its own dashboards, definitions, and limitations. There was no single, consolidated view of how communications were performing across channels, which made it difficult to understand reach, engagement, or effectiveness.”
Investment Objectives
The interviewees searched for a solution that could:
-
Deliver personalized, timely communication across all channels (e.g., mobile, email, intranet, digital signage).
-
Connect every worker, including deskless and frontline employees, with relevant information.
-
Provide analytics and AI-driven insights to optimize engagement.
-
Create a unified digital employee experience that integrates with existing systems.
Composite Organization
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
-
Description of composite. The global, multibillion-dollar organization has a large, skilled frontline workforce and a centralized internal communications team responsible for employee engagement. Prior to Firstup, the composite relied on a mix of email and intranet point solutions and manual processes that resulted in fragmented messaging and limited reach to frontline employees.
-
Deployment characteristics. The composite deploys Firstup as its primary workforce communications platform for mobile, email, digital signage, and web communication channels.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
-
10,000 total employees (65% frontline workforce)
-
$2 billion annual revenue
-
15 communications employees
-
30 content creators
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Increased retention for frontline employees | $1,872,000 | $1,872,000 | $1,872,000 | $5,616,000 | $4,655,387 |
| Btr | Employee productivity savings | $931,545 | $931,545 | $931,545 | $2,794,635 | $2,316,615 |
| Ctr | Risk reduction from improved safety and compliance | $360,000 | $450,000 | $540,000 | $1,350,000 | $1,104,884 |
| Dtr | Communications efficiencies | $174,960 | $217,080 | $259,200 | $651,240 | $533,200 |
| Etr | Legacy solution and processes cost savings | $135,000 | $135,000 | $135,000 | $405,000 | $335,725 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $3,473,505 | $3,605,625 | $3,737,745 | $10,816,875 | $8,945,811 |
Increased Retention For Frontline Employees
Evidence and data. Interviewees demonstrated that Firstup played a critical role in improving frontline employee retention by strengthening connection, visibility, and inclusion. Interviewees highlighted that the platform was foundational to their communications strategy and allowed their teams to scale initiatives effectively, which helped reduce employee turnover. In particular, targeted communication, mobile access for frontline staff, and two‑way engagement capabilities improved employees’ sense of being informed and valued, which interviewees described as critical to sustaining frontline workforce stability.
-
The VP of marketing and communications at a healthcare organization highlighted that internal communications through Firstup were vital to reducing overall turnover and attributed 30% of overall reduction in turnover toward efforts made with the platform. The interviewee commented: “We’ve seen a 16% year‑over‑year decrease in voluntary turnover and about a 15% decrease in first‑year turnover, with an even more significant reduction among nurses. Firstup was certainly a contributor to this improvement.”
The interviewee highlighted that Firstup was critical to new employee onboarding within a specific department, particularly in driving awareness and participation. Leadership in this department built Firstup use into their onboarding process and noted a 12-percentage-point improvement in retention for employees who attended onboarding events promoted through the platform.
-
The assistant director of communications and marketing operations at a healthcare organization noted a correlation between improved communications with Firstup and improved employee experience, commenting: “There’s a correlation there. Year to date, after our first year of implementation, there was around a 4% decrease in turnover. And currently, we’ve projected around a 1% decrease year over year, just since the beginning of our fiscal year.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
There are 6,500 skilled frontline employees and 3,500 desk employees.
-
Before Firstup, there is a 20% voluntary skilled frontline worker attrition rate.
-
With Firstup, attrition decreases by 4%. This decrease is considering a 10% total reduction in turnover after implementing Firstup, with 30% of this reduction attributable to Firstup as the mechanism to scale companywide initiatives in improving company culture and reducing turnover.
-
On average, the cost of recruiting, hiring, and onboarding a frontline employee is $40,000.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
-
The industry-standard voluntary attrition rate of frontline employees.
-
Companywide initiatives launched through Firstup in efforts to reduce turnover.
-
The industry-standard average cost of recruiting, hiring, and onboarding a frontline employee. Healthcare organizations may see higher costs of recruiting, hiring, and onboarding a skilled frontline employee of approximately $60,000.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.7 million.
4%
Reduction in attrition rate for frontline employees
Increased Retention For Frontline Employees
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Employees | Composite | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| A2 | Percentage of frontline workers | Composite | 65% | 65% | 65% | |
| A3 | Voluntary frontline worker attrition rate before Firstup | Composite | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| A4 | Reduction in attrition rate for frontline employees after Firstup | Interviews | 4% | 4% | 4% | |
| A5 | Frontline employees retained with Firstup | A1*A2*A3*A4 | 52 | 52 | 52 | |
| A6 | Average cost of recruiting, hiring, and onboarding a frontline employee | Composite | $40,000 | $40,000 | $40,000 | |
| At | Increased retention for frontline employees | A5*A6 | $2,080,000 | $2,080,000 | $2,080,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Increased retention for frontline employees (risk-adjusted) | $1,872,000 | $1,872,000 | $1,872,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $5,616,000 | Three-year present value: $4,655,387 | |||||
Employee Productivity Savings
Evidence and data. Interviewees consistently described productivity benefits due to reduced time spent searching for information and executing communication tasks. Prior to Firstup, employees and communicators navigated fragmented environments consisting of email, intranet sites, mobile apps, and third‑party tools. Firstup centralized access into a single destination, reducing navigation friction and duplicated effort. Interviewees noted that these time savings accrued incrementally but scaled significantly across large employee populations.
-
The director of employee communication and digital platforms at an IT distribution organization highlighted how Firstup became a one-stop-shop for employees to find communications, commenting, “Centralizing resources has saved employees time because they no longer need to hunt across sites, emails, or legacy tools.”
-
The assistant director of communications and marketing operations at a healthcare organization discussed how different business units streamlined workflows with Firstup and unlocked time savings, commenting: “People in human resources are able to work much more autonomously without having to come through marketing, where things can bottleneck. It’s contributed to more hours available to work on other projects, it’s freed up the workflow. I would say a ballpark of 20% to 25% more productive.”
-
The VP of marketing and communications at a healthcare organization discussed the power of scaling even small time savings per employee across a large workforce, commenting: “If we can save people time by keeping them inside one platform instead of hopping between systems, that’s meaningful at scale. One of the biggest productivity gains is eliminating extra clicks, extra logins, and extra steps to get information.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
It has 6,500 frontline employees and 3,500 desk employees.
-
On average, frontline employees save 6 hours per year searching for communications with Firstup with its consistent messaging across mobile access and digital signage.
-
Desk employees save 2 hours per year searching for relevant communications as a result of centralized and consistent messaging across intranet, email, and mobile access with Firstup.
-
There is a 50% productivity recapture to account for improved employee experience.
-
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a frontline employee is $46. The average fully burdened hourly rate for a desk employee is $40.3
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
-
Prior communication tools and processes used to search for information.
-
Industry standards for the average fully burdened hourly rates for frontline and desk employees.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.3 million.
69,000 hours
Productive hours saved searching for communications with Firstup by Year 3
Employee Productivity Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Frontline employees | A1*A2 | 6,500 | 6,500 | 6,500 | |
| B2 | Average time frontline employees save searching for communications with Firstup (hours) | Interviews | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| B3 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| B4 | Productive frontline employee time saved searching for communications with Firstup (hours) | B1*B2*B3 | 19,500 | 19,500 | 19,500 | |
| B5 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for a frontline employee | Research data | $46 | $46 | $46 | |
| B6 | Subtotal: Frontline employee productivity savings | B4*B5 | $895,050 | $895,050 | $895,050 | |
| B7 | Desk employees | A1*(1-A2) | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | |
| B8 | Average time desk employees save searching for communications with Firstup (hours) | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| B9 | Productive desk employee time saved searching for communications with Firstup (hours) | B3*B7*B8 | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | |
| B10 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for an employee | Research data | $40 | $40 | $40 | |
| B11 | Subtotal: Frontline employee productivity savings | B9*B10 | $140,000 | $140,000 | $140,000 | |
| Bt | Employee productivity savings | B6+B11 | $1,035,050 | $1,035,050 | $1,035,050 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Btr | Employee productivity savings (risk-adjusted) | $931,545 | $931,545 | $931,545 | ||
| Three-year total: $2,794,635 | Three-year present value: $2,316,615 | |||||
Risk Reduction From Improved Safety And Compliance
Evidence and data. For organizations with significant frontline, healthcare, and manufacturing populations, Firstup supported measurable improvements in safety outcomes by enabling more consistent, timely, and visible safety communications. Interviewees explained that Firstup supported rapid dissemination of alerts, reinforcement of compliance behaviors via digital signage, and recognition of proactive safety actions, all of which contributed to risk reduction. Although interviewees acknowledged that safety outcomes depended on leadership and training programs, they consistently viewed Firstup as a critical delivery mechanism that reduced operational risk exposure and supported compliance objectives.
Beyond measurable outcomes, interviewees emphasized a more human and meaningful impact in helping ensure that employees can do their jobs and return home safely at the end of each day. Interviewees noted that their employees felt more confident that their well-being was a priority, while visible recognition of safe behaviors reinforced a shared responsibility for protecting one another.
-
The chief innovation officer and physician at a healthcare organization discussed how Firstup was critical in their “Good Catch Program,” where employees were able to quickly report near-miss patient errors, and cited more than a 50% increase in near-miss reporting using the platform. The interviewee commented: “Firstup expanded who could participate in safety, giving a broader population of team members access to the data and the stories behind it. When team members know they’re heard and their voice matters, safety reporting becomes an act of engagement, not compliance.”
This interviewee also shared tangible examples of near-miss errors, including medication errors. They noted that their organization prevented 11 medication errors from reaching patients, which was directly tied to visibility and engagement created through Firstup. The interviewee commented, “Firstup helped surface critical medication issues earlier, turning potential harm into preventable events.”
As a result of the improved near-miss reporting Firstup enabled, the healthcare organization was able to serve more patients and noted a 25% increase in adjusted patient day volume (hospital and skilled nursing patient days adjusted to account for outpatient activity) capacity.
-
The corporate internal communications lead at a manufacturing organization discussed their broader digital signage coverage with Firstup compared to the prior environment where it was managed separately and less centrally. Now, they align communications with email and app messaging, reinforcing the same messaging to all employees in the company. This interviewee commented: “Firstup has been a key driver in reinforcing our Mission Zero safety culture and making safety communications consistent and visible. We reach about 85% of our workforce through digital signage, which has been critical for safety messaging in manufacturing environments.”
-
The VP of marketing and communications at a healthcare organization also discussed increased employee engagement with Firstup in reporting incidents, commenting, “With Firstup, we’ve made it much easier for people to report safety incidents, especially from a mobile device, something that wasn’t possible before.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
Prior to Firstup, there is an average of eight serious safety incidents per year.
-
With Firstup, there is a 20% reduction in the number of safety incidents in Year 1, a 25% reduction in Year 2, and a 30% reduction in Year 3.
-
The average cost per safety incident is $250,000. This includes various costs related to insurance claims, productivity loss, worker compensation, compliance fees, etc.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
-
Industry and role-related safety incidents.
-
The average cost per safety incident will vary depending on the severity of the incidents measured and prevented with Firstup. In some cases, interviewees noted a higher number of incidents at a lower cost per incident. With scale, the impact of these avoided costs enabled by Firstup can be significant.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.1 million.
30%
Reduction in serious safety incidents with Firstup by Year 3
Risk Reduction From Improved Safety And Compliance
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Average serious safety incidents before Firstup | Composite | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| C2 | Percent reduction in serious safety incidents with Firstup | Interviews | 20% | 25% | 30% | |
| C3 | Average cost per safety incident | Interviews | $250,000 | $250,000 | $250,000 | |
| Ct | Risk reduction from improved safety and compliance | C1*C2*C3 | $400,000 | $500,000 | $600,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Risk reduction from improved safety and compliance (risk-adjusted) | $360,000 | $450,000 | $540,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,350,000 | Three-year present value: $1,104,884 | |||||
Communications Efficiencies
Evidence and data. Across interviews, communications leaders reported that Firstup delivered efficiency gains by consolidating workflows, automating audience targeting, and embedding analytics directly into the communication process. Prior to adoption, many teams relied on manual list building, IT support, or multiple tools to segment audiences and measure effectiveness. Firstup enabled communications teams to create content once and deliver it across channels, shifting effort away from operational execution toward strategic advisory work.
-
The corporate internal communications lead at a manufacturing organization described significant time saved from consolidating their communication platforms into one with Firstup, commenting, “Across our almost 400 content creators, we estimated just under 3,000 hours saved annually by creating content once instead of building the same message in four different systems.”
-
The VP of marketing and communications at a healthcare organization discussed how leaders across the company were now empowered as content creators to distribute their own messaging, taking the burden off the communications team. They commented: “Employee resource groups running their own channels has removed a huge operational burden from our communications team. Instead of managing everything centrally, we’ve empowered teams across the organization to communicate directly and effectively.”
-
The director of employee communication and digital platforms at an IT distribution organization highlighted the career growth for employees on the communication team with a platform like Firstup, commenting: “Firstup allowed us to step back from operational busywork and focus on message quality, timing, and relevance.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
There are 15 communications employees responsible for corporate communications and 30 content creators.
-
With Firstup, communications employees increase productivity by 20% in Year 1, 25% in Year 2, and 30% in Year 3. Content creators, who are leaders across the organization, also experience time savings in creating posts, saving an average of 8 hours per year on content creation.
-
There is a 50% productivity recapture to account for improved work-life balance with Firstup.
-
Internal communications employees and content creators (e.g., managers, HR, operations contributors) have a fully burdened hourly rate of $60.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
-
The number of communications employees and content creators.
-
The fully burdened hourly rates dependent on roles.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $533,000.
12,060
Productive hours saved on communications by Year 3
Communications Efficiencies
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Communications employees responsible for corporate communications | Composite | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| D2 | Percentage increase in productivity with Firstup | Interviews | 20% | 25% | 30% | |
| D3 | Productivity recapture | TEI Methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| D4 | Productive time saved for communications teams with Firstup (hours) | D1*D2*D3*2080 | 3,120 | 3,900 | 4,680 | |
| D5 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an internal communications employee | Composite | $60 | $60 | $60 | |
| D6 | Subtotal: Communications efficiencies | D4*D5 | $187,200 | $234,000 | $280,800 | |
| D7 | Content creators | Composite | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
| D8 | Average time spent by content creators on communications (hours) | Interviews | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| D9 | Productive time saved for content creators with Firstup (hours) | D3*D7*D8 | 120 | 120 | 120 | |
| D10 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a content creator | Composite | $60 | $60 | $60 | |
| D11 | Subtotal: Content creator efficiencies | D9*D10 | $7,200 | $7,200 | $7,200 | |
| Dt | Communications efficiencies | D6*D11 | $194,400 | $241,200 | $288,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | Communications efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $174,960 | $217,080 | $259,200 | ||
| Three-year total: $651,240 | Three-year present value: $533,200 | |||||
Legacy Solution And Processes Cost Savings
Evidence and data. Interviewees highlighted direct cost savings by consolidating and retiring legacy communication solutions. In addition to direct software cost savings, organizations emphasized reduced administrative overhead, fewer vendor dependencies, and lower training costs as meaningful contributors to long‑term economic value.
-
The VP of marketing and communications at a healthcare organization discussed the benefits of adopting Firstup versus building an in-house platform, commenting: “We avoided building and maintaining our own system, which would have required significant IT resources we simply didn’t have.”
-
The director of employee communication and digital platforms at an IT distribution organization highlighted retiring a number of tools and licensing by consolidating communications with Firstup, commenting: “We’ve retired [point solution] entirely and sunset legacy intranets as part of our consolidation. We also were able to sunset six to eight large [point solution] licenses by moving global town halls into the Firstup platform.”
-
The corporate internal communications lead at a manufacturing organization further highlighted their efforts in consolidating systems with Firstup, which enabled significant cost savings. They commented, “Consolidating email tools, digital signage, and mobile communications into Firstup reduced both direct costs and operational overhead.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes that the composite organization has retired licensing and IT management costs of $150,000 per year in Years 1 through 3.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on the number of legacy solutions replaced by streamlining communications through Firstup.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $336,000.
Legacy Solution And Processes Cost Savings
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Average communications tool licensing costs before Firstup | Interviews | $150,000 | $150,000 | $150,000 | |
| Et | Legacy solution and processes cost savings | E1 | $150,000 | $150,000 | $150,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Etr | Legacy solution and processes cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $135,000 | $135,000 | $135,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $405,000 | Three-year present value: $335,725 | |||||
Unquantified Benefits
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
-
Increased employee engagement and satisfaction. Leaders observed measurable improvements in engagement and satisfaction survey results following Firstup implementation, even during periods of disruption such as mergers, leadership transitions, safety transformations, and crisis events.
The director of colleague communications at a retail organization discussed increased engagement with employees through Firstup that enabled insights into employee needs, commenting: “It’s almost like a survey of 100,000 people every single month. By seeing what colleagues are clicking on, opening, and engaging with, we get a much better handle of what’s on people’s minds, which is extremely hard to do otherwise.”
-
Improved strategic influence on communications teams. Communications leaders consistently reported that Firstup elevated their role from message delivery to strategic partnership. Access to targeting, insights, and analytics allowed teams to advise leaders on timing, relevance, and effectiveness rather than simply executing requests. This increased credibility with executives positioned communications as a value-generating function rather than a cost center.
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Firstup and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
-
External validation of strategic value. The flexibility enabled by Firstup allowed one interviewee’s organization to expand its communications strategy beyond initial employee messaging to include a structured, manager‑specific communications program. This expanded use of the platform contributed to improved engagement, consistency, and leadership alignment. It resulted in external recognition through an award for manager communications, demonstrating how Firstup enabled future initiatives and strategic outcomes without additional technology investment.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | Licensing costs | $0 | $550,000 | $550,000 | $550,000 | $1,650,000 | $1,367,769 |
| Gtr | Planning, deployment, and change management | $211,200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $211,200 | $211,200 |
| Htr | Ongoing management costs | $0 | $88,000 | $88,000 | $88,000 | $264,000 | $218,843 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $211,200 | $638,000 | $638,000 | $638,000 | $2,125,200 | $1,797,812 |
Licensing Costs
Evidence and data. Firstup licensing costs are typically structured on a per user, per year basis and scale based on the size of the employee population and selected capabilities. Interviewees noted that licensing fees replaced a patchwork of legacy communication tools, consolidating costs into a single platform. Although licensing represented an upfront investment, interviewees reported that the predictable pricing model supported budgeting and enabled broader adoption without incremental per use fees. Pricing may vary. Contact Firstup for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes that the composite organization pays $500,000 per year, which covers Firstup access for all employees (frontline and desk).
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on the number of users and Firstup features included in the plan.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.4 million.
Licensing Costs
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Users | Composite | $500,000 | $500,000 | $500,000 | |
| Ft | Licensing costs | F1 | $0 | $500,000 | $500,000 | $500,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Ftr | Licensing costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $550,000 | $550,000 | $550,000 | |
| Three-year total: $1,650,000 | Three-year present value: $1,367,769 | |||||
Planning, Deployment, And Change Management
Evidence and data. Interviewees said that Firstup planning and deployment required coordinated effort across communications, HR, and IT teams to define target audiences, content strategy, and governance. They completed deployment within a planned timeframe using Firstup’s standard configuration model and did not require significant custom development. Change management activities focused on driving adoption among communications teams and managers, with training, onboarding, and early use‑case validation helping accelerate time to value.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
-
Over three months, 10 FTEs across communications and IT spend 50% of their time on planning, deployment, and change management efforts.
-
The blended fully burdened monthly rate for communications and IT professionals is $12,800.
-
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on the internal effort toward on Firstup change management.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $211,000.
Planning, Deployment, And Change Management
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Time spent on planning, deployment, and change management (months) | Interviews | 3 | |||
| G2 | Communications and IT FTEs dedicated to planning, deployment, and change management | Interviews | 10 | |||
| G3 | Percentage of time dedicated to planning, deployment, and change management | Interviews | 50% | |||
| G4 | Blended fully burdened monthly rate for a communications and IT FTE | Composite | $12,800 | |||
| Gt | Planning, deployment, and change management | G1*G2*G3*G4 | $192,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Gtr | Planning, deployment, and change management (risk-adjusted) | $211,200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| Three-year total: $211,200 | Three-year present value: $211,200 | |||||
Ongoing Management Costs
Evidence and data. Ongoing management of Firstup requires minimal ongoing effort following implementation. Interviewees reported that existing communications or HR staff spent minimal time weekly on administration, such as user management, content updates, and basic configuration. Because the platform requires limited technical oversight and infrequent troubleshooting, their organizations sustained ongoing operations without additional headcount or external support, integrating Firstup management into standard business responsibilities.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes that the composite organization has one communications employee dedicated to supporting communication platforms. They direct approximately 50% of their time toward Firstup.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on the number of FTEs dedicated to supporting the platform.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $219,000.
Ongoing Management Costs
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | FTEs dedicated to ongoing management | Interviews | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| H2 | Percentage of FTE time spent on ongoing management | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| H3 | Fully burdened annual salary for an IT admin | Composite | $160,000 | 160,000 | 160,000 | |
| Ht | Ongoing management costs | H1*H2*H3 | $0 | $80,000 | $80,000 | $80,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Htr | Ongoing management costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $88,000 | $88,000 | $88,000 | |
| Three-year total: $264,000 | Three-year present value: $218,843 | |||||
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($211,200) | ($638,000) | ($638,000) | ($638,000) | ($2,125,200) | ($1,797,812) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $3,473,505 | $3,605,625 | $3,737,745 | $10,816,875 | $8,945,811 |
| Net benefits | ($211,200) | $2,835,505 | $2,967,625 | $3,099,745 | $8,691,675 | $7,147,999 |
| ROI | 398% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Firstup.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Firstup can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Firstup stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Firstup.
Interviews
Interviewed eight decision-makers at organizations using Firstup to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Composite Organization
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Endnotes
1 Source: The Intranet Platforms Landscape, Q4 2025, Forrester Research Inc., December 16, 2025.
2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
3 Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Firstup and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Firstup.
Firstup reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Firstup provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Nikoletta Stergiou
Published
June 2026