Succeeding in today’s business environment places new demands on the modern workforce to deliver near-instant answers in increasingly overwhelming, content-rich environments. Employees are navigating hybrid work environments, rich media file formats, and poorly integrated applications that lead to context switching and time loss when executing in their day-to-day roles. Many organizations’ legacy technology tools hinder productivity due to limited cross-application search, slow load times, and isolated workflows that don’t support distributed team structures and workflows.
Tools like Dash, with its AI-infused features, help employees and teams accelerate both common and revenue-generating activities in a secure environment. Dash allows teams to query company documentation and IP across multiple applications and platforms and provides sales, marketing, and IT teams both contextual support and collaboration that keeps pace with customer demand and accelerates business growth. Dash also supports a security-first approach by operating within internal systems and permissions, helping teams unlock productivity gains without sacrificing trust.
Dropbox commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Dash.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Dash on their organizations.
216%
Return on investment (ROI)
$612K
Net present value (NPV)
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Dash. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, a global B2B organization with 300 employees and revenue of $200 million per year.
Interviewees said that prior to using Dash, their organizations were plagued by siloed knowledge, inconsistent workflows and file-naming conventions, poor search functionality, and multiple platforms and file structures that failed to find and surface content in the context of everyday work situations. Interviewees described time-consuming searches for relevant content and data and reliance on human memory that was then lost via employee churn. These limitations led to slow campaign cycles, dependence on outside contractors to accelerate delivery, suboptimal proposal responses due to outdated pricing or competitive positioning, lengthened process workflows, and little to no collaboration across distributed teams.
After the investment in Dash, the interviewees describe much-improved access to knowledge and searchability that both eliminates silos and surfaces information at the right time for the right roles, reducing dependencies on institutional knowledge and returning autonomy to individuals to get work done. Key results from the investment include accelerated creative production, faster onboarding, and higher-quality work output, all in a secure environment.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Increased revenue through business acceleration and net-new revenue streams valued at $20,000 over three years. The composite organization can access — and therefore include — more examples of past work in proposals, improving its overall quality and impact. Dash also enables it to produce more proposals, resulting in more closed business.
Cost savings of $195,000 from decommissioning content tools and reducing outsource fees. Dash enables the composite organization to shift from manual writing to producing Dash-generated first drafts, allowing it to cancel its contract with a digital marketing firm.
Faster workflows and reduced manual effort, driving productivity gains worth $682,000. Dash streamlines both content creation and internal documentation access for marketing and sales teams, saving time across multiple user groups.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Data security. Dash works with each organization’s own content and connects only to authorized applications. Enterprises using Dash’s Protect and Control features benefit from data access governance, enabling faster permission management and clear visibility into user access to content. This closed, controlled environment critically reduces the risk of external exposure that can occur with other AI tools.
Higher-quality deliverables. Dash improves the quality and consistency of customer-facing deliverables. By giving teams instant access to prior work, rate cards, and client preferences, Dash enables more informed proposals, more accurate pricing, and stronger storytelling — reducing errors that erode customer trust.
Faster onboarding. Dash accelerates onboarding by giving new hires immediate access to the knowledge, documents, and workflows they need to contribute on day one. Teams can create role‑specific Stacks, or collections of content, helping employees quickly build autonomy without relying heavily on longer-tenured staff.
Improved employee experience. Employees feel more confident in the deliverables they produce, which strengthens collaboration, increases trust across teams and geographies, and helps employees autonomously accomplish more.
Better enablement of remote work. Dash strengthens distributed workforces by centralizing knowledge in a single, searchable environment. Remote and global teams can collaborate more efficiently with faster access to information, while organizations gain greater flexibility to hire talent across geographies.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Subscription fees for Dash. Organizations pay a subscription fee for Dash on a per-user per-month basis. The composite organization pays $35 per user per month for Dash.
Initial and ongoing Dash management. For the composite organization, onboarding Dash users is nearly instantaneous. Administrative tasks and training for user enablement across departments is approximately 1 to 3 hours per year.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $896,000 over three years versus costs of $284,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $612,000 and an ROI of 216%.
“You can’t keep doing things the same way and be successful; you have to fundamentally change how you’re going to find and share information as an organization. Dash helps enable that because it becomes the centralized core of all your information, accessible through a user interface everyone is used to using.”
CEO, advertising
Key Statistics
216%
Return on investment (ROI)
$896K
Benefits PV
$612K
Net present value (NPV)
Benefits (Three-Year)
[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Business acceleration and incremental profitCost savingsProfitability gains
The Dropbox Dash Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the Dash investment
Interviews
Role
Industry
Region
Annual Revenue
CRO
Publishing
Global
$72 million
CEO
Advertising
US
$15 million
Group IT manager
Construction
Asia Pacific
$500 million
Director of IT
Sporting goods
Global
$25 million
Key Challenges
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Siloed knowledge and inconsistent workflows. Interviewees described fragmented data across multiple platforms, legacy information locked in human silos, and inefficient file access due to complicated file structures and hierarchies.
Poor search functionality. Finding information across organizations was cited as being extremely difficult by the interviewees. Data was typically spread across multiple applications with no tool that searched across platforms, applications, or file types, and there was a high dependency on human memory that was then lost due to employee attrition.
Difficulty onboarding new employees. Knowledge scattered across the organization also did little to help bring new hires into the fold. Companies lacked standard templates and processes and had no centralized collection of information to help employees new to the organization get up to speed, requiring them to navigate organizational charts to ask for help.
“We relied on centralized sources of knowledge — humans. If you didn’t know who to ask, you’d never find it. New hires couldn’t benefit from 20 years of work because it wasn’t searchable or organized.”
CEO, advertising
Composite Organization
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the four interviewees with experience using Dropbox Dash, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
The composite organization is an industry-agnostic, medium-size B2B enterprise with 300 employees and $200 million in annual revenue.
The organization uses the Dropbox suite and adds Dash in response to user demand for an AI-enabled tool to help enable better search and accelerated productivity in a secure environment. Sales, marketing, IT, and risk/security roles are the first to use the tool, with planned rollout of Dash to additional teams.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
$200 million revenue
300 employees
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref.
Benefit
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Atr
Business acceleration and incremental profit
$5,400
$8,100
$10,800
$24,300
$19,718
Btr
Cost savings
$78,300
$78,300
$78,300
$234,900
$194,721
Ctr
Productivity gains
$142,515
$265,486
$442,649
$850,649
$681,537
Total benefits (risk-adjusted)
$226,215
$351,886
$531,749
$1,109,849
$895,976
Business Acceleration And Incremental Profit
Evidence and data. Before adopting Dash, users at the interviewees’ organizations delivered less output because they lacked key capabilities. They were held back by:
Limited access to intellectual property, past content, and creative work due to siloed knowledge bases, disconnected systems, and frequent access barriers.
Fragmented workflows across client portals, disparate applications, and internal documentation.
Heavy reliance on long-tenured staff to locate information or recall institutional knowledge.
Each interviewee shared examples of how their users increased output — and positioned their organizations for incremental profit — after adopting Dash.
At the advertising company, staff were able to instantly surface examples, past campaigns, RFP responses, and creative references. The team broke down long‑standing knowledge silos and democratized access to information, creating meaningful qualitative gains: more consistent proposals, higher‑quality responses, and better storytelling. These improvements increased both the win rate and the number of opportunities the team could pursue with the same headcount.
At the publishing company, the marketing team shifted from manual writing to Dash‑generated first drafts, significantly expanding their output capacity. The CRO quantified the impact of this reclaimed time by translating it directly into additional selling capacity: “A rep could find another 5 hours a week to close deals, and across the year, it’s 250 hours. And with 250 hours, how many deals could be closed? How much revenue?”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Annual revenue is $200 million.
The organization sees 0.25% revenue increase per year, 10% of which it can attribute to Dash.
Operating margin is 12%.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The organization’s content quality, data readiness, and data hygiene.
The organization’s change management effectiveness and sales and marketing team adoption of new tools.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of nearly $20,000.
0.25%
Revenue increase per year.
“Dash is a big piece of [our growth plan]; we do hope we can generate another 10% of revenue for the company over the next three years annually, if we’re able to have a team that is using the tech stack right, because the tech stack is key in sales.”
CRO, publishing
Business Acceleration And Incremental Profit
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
A1
Total annual revenue
Composite
$200,000,000
$200,000,000
$200,000,000
A2
Increased revenue through business acceleration and net-new revenue streams
Interviews
0.25%
0.25%
0.25%
A3
Percent credit assigned to Dropbox Dash
Composite
10%
15%
20%
A4
Operating margin
Composite
12%
12%
12%
At
Business acceleration and incremental profit
A1*A2*A3*A4
$6,000
$9,000
$12,000
Risk adjustment
↓10%
Atr
Business acceleration and incremental profit (risk-adjusted)
$5,400
$8,100
$10,800
Three-year total: $24,300
Three-year present value: $19,718
Cost Savings
Evidence and data. Before adopting Dash, employees and teams at the interviewees’ organizations relied on tools and outsourced resources to meet demands and timelines.
Marketing struggled to scale content creation and relied on multiple tools, requiring manual pulling of assets and often-duplicated workflows.
IT had to maintain multiple AI tools, increasing cost, risk, and redundancies.
Teams contracted with digital marketing agencies and contractors to augment staff capacity and skill sets to keep up with the cadence and volume of campaign production.
Interviewees were able to reduce and eliminate tools and services for tangible cost savings.
The publishing company decommissioned a data content syncing tool and reduced its enterprise CRM platform spend, saving $2,000 per year.
Its marketing team shifted from manual writing to producing Dash-generated first drafts. This allowed it to increase the team’s output capacity and cancel its contract with a digital marketing firm, saving $85,000 per year. The CRO at the publishing company noted: “We have stopped doing initial creative on anything; we’ve changed our workflow. We’ve been able to scale what we are doing and grow the business.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Prior to deploying Dash, it spent $2,000 a year on a content-syncing tool.
It also spent $85,000 a year with a digital marketing service before transitioning to Dash.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The number of existing legacy tools and systems and decommissioning potential.
The fluctuations in team resourcing necessitating the use of outsourced providers.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $195,000.
Cost Savings
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
B1
Decommissioned content syncing tool
Interviews
$2,000
$2,000
$2,000
B2
Digital marketing services
Interviews
$85,000
$85,000
$85,000
Bt
Cost savings
B1+B2
$87,000
$87,000
$87,000
Risk adjustment
↓10%
Btr
Cost savings (risk-adjusted)
$78,300
$78,300
$78,300
Three-year total: $234,900
Three-year present value: $194,721
Productivity Gains
Evidence and data. Interviewees shared with Forrester ample evidence of increased productivity across multiple teams and employee tasks after the investment in Dash. These productivity gains showed up in time saved, faster workflows, and reduced manual effort.
Sales teams responsible for building proposals struggled with time-wasting activities and relied heavily on other employees to locate necessary information.
Teams retrieving information across disconnected systems faced clunky processes and often duplicated work because prior campaigns and historical examples were too hard to locate.
Salespeople found it difficult to locate and reference pricing information and client preferences — both critical to high‑quality proposals — especially in remotework environments.
Interviewees shared how Dash improved their sales teams’ productivity.
The CEO at an agency estimated that their sales team experienced a 50% reduction in RFP preparation time, explaining that proposals requiring 6 hours now take only 2. Searching for files that had previously taken 30 to 60 minutes now took 5 to 10 minutes. The CEO noted: “Hunting and pecking used to take minutes; now I can search and get the answer in 5 seconds. That’s the type of micro improvement we’ve seen over time.”
Dash empowers newer sales employees by giving them immediate access to years of legacy knowledge, eliminating the need to interrupt senior staff. The CEO at an advertising organization said, “Dash broke down years of knowledge silos and finally made our history accessible to everyone.”
At the publishing organization, the CRO highlighted Dash’s outsized impact on its small sales organization. The team fields a very high volume of pricing and policy questions from clients, and Dash now answers those queries instantly. The CRO shared: “We handle over 600 accounts with a very small team. Dash is crucial to making that possible.”
Dash also strengthens consistency in client communications and pricing across industries. Sales reps and account managers can now instantly query rate cards, prior proposals, and official documentation.
Marketing and creative teams — which had also struggled under heavy demands for content creation, campaign production, and sales support — also found that Dash provided several efficiencies.
Marketing teams often spent hours generating blog posts, writing campaign and email copy, and creating other net‑new content for proposal support and client needs. As part of these workflows, they had to search across multiple repositories for rich media assets and historical materials.
Dash streamlined both content creation and internal documentation access, allowing marketers to scale their support for day-to-day demands. The CRO at the publishing company described Dash as a “virtual FTE” in marketing, saving at least 10 hours a week, particularly in blog post initiation.
The sporting goods company’s marketing organization can now find and curate media files with simple, natural language queries, allowing the team to dedicate more time to, as noted by the director of IT, “actually editing and creating content for our company.”
Teams that relied on access to critical files — and on the collaboration on and maintenance of those files — were able to use Dash as their first stop for essential business processes.
According to its group IT manager, the construction company’s inspection test plans (ITPs), which form the backbone of its qualityassurance program, ran more smoothly with support from Dash. Dash helped teams create and validate ITPs, which are central to compliance.
Dash specifically replaced manual PDF searches with smart, conversational queries. It also improved collaboration across regional teams and raised the consistency and quality of the test plans. These improvements reduced onsite rework — which can cost millions — and drove measurable productivity gains. The health and safety operations team at the same company used Dash daily to compare, summarize, and report incidents — roughly 600 observations per month. With the Dash Chrome add‑in, they were able to summarize long-form documents directly in the native health and safety system, saving minutes per record and several hours each month.
Dash’s capabilities benefited teams whose responsibilities require precise access to the most up‑to‑date specifications, revisions, and safety‑critical documentation.
The director of IT at the sporting goods company described how Dash enables quality control teams to search for part numbers and validate exact specifications for lifesaving devices like the emergency breathing systems used on offshore helicopter flights. Incorrect specifications could be life‑threatening, and Dash reduced the risk of outdated versions, incorrect specifications, and the need for rework.
Frequent turnover in risk-focused roles (approximately every four to six months) previously forced teams to rely on engineers to locate specifications. Dash enabled self‑service access to the correct documents, helping new inspectors become productive faster and saving 2 to 3 hours per week per inspector.
Interviews for this study captured productivity gains for sales, marketing, IT, and risk/security roles; additional roles may have experienced productivity gains not quantified above.
“There’s probably a good 30% productivity gain. … The time saved finding and collating these documents is saving days and days of work.”
Group IT manager, construction
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Thirty salespeople spend 20 hours a month writing proposals in Year 1, growing to 70 in Year 3. They see a 20% time savings in Year 1, 25% time savings in Year 2, and 30% time savings in Year 3 as the sales team gains experience in using Dash.
Ten marketing associates use Dash in Year 1, growing to 20 in Year 3. Each spends an average of 25 hours a month writing content and 10 hours a month locating content. They see a 20% time savings in Year 1, 25% time savings in Year 2, and 30% time savings in Year 3 as the marketing team gains experience in using Dash.
There are eight IT users in Year 1, growing to 17 in Year 3, all spending 20 hours a month querying contracts. They see a 30% time savings per year.
There are two risk and compliance professionals in Year 1, growing to three by Year 3. They spend an average of 16 hours each month creating compliance plans. They see a 15% time savings in Year 1, 20% time savings in Year 2, and 25% time savings in Year 3 as the risk and compliance team gains experience in using Dash.
A 50% productivity capture is applied to reclaimed working hours, as it cannot be assumed that all time will be repurposed to value-added activities.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
The ease of search features in prior tools as it relates to querying and results in Dash.
The nature of an organization’s workflows and content quality as it relates to the potential of productivity improvement.
The skill and capacity of personnel managing sales, marketing, IT, and risk at their organizations.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $682,000.
Productivity Gains
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
C1
Total employees
Composite
300
300
300
C2
Total sales users
Composite
30
50
70
C3
Hours per month spent building proposals per month before Dash
Interviews
20
20
20
C4
Hours per month spent searching assets for content before Dash
Interviews
10
10
10
C5
Percentage of time saved with Dash
Interviews
20%
25%
30%
C6
Fully burdened hourly rate for a sales user
Research Data
$84
$84
$84
C7
Subtotal: Sales productivity improvements
(C3+C4)*C5*C6*C2*12
$181,440
$378,000
$635,040
C8
Total marketing users
Composite
10
15
20
C9
Hours per month spent creating blog content per month before Dash
Interviews
25
25
25
C10
Hours per month spent locating media campaign files and assets before Dash
Interviews
10
10
10
C11
Percentage of time saved with Dash
Interviews
20%
25%
30%
C12
Fully burdened hourly rate for a marketing user
Research data
$81
$81
$81
C13
Subtotal: Marketing productivity improvements
(C9+C10)*C11*C12*C8*12
$68,040
$127,575
$204,120
C14
Total IT administrator users
Composite
8
10
17
C15
Hours per month spent querying supplier contracts and other documentation before Dash
Interviews
20
20
20
C16
Percentage of time saved with Dash
Interviews
30%
30%
30%
C17
Fully burdened hourly rate for an IT administrator user
Research Data
$109
$109
$109
C18
Subtotal: IT administration productivity improvements
C15*C16*C17*C14*12
$62,784
$78,480
$133,416
C19
Total risk and compliance users
Composite
2
2
3
C20
Hours per month spent creating testing and compliance plans before Dash
Interviews
16
16
16
C21
Percentage of time saved with Dropbox Dash
Interviews
15%
20%
25%
C22
Fully burdened hourly rate for a risk and compliance user
Research Data
$77
$77
$77
C23
Subtotal: Risk and compliance productivity improvements
C20*C21*C22*C19*12
$4,435
$5,914
$11,088
C24
Productivity recapture rate
TEI methodology
50%
50%
50%
Ct
Productivity gains
(C7+C13+C18+C23)*C24
$158,350
$294,984
$491,832
Risk adjustment
↓10%
Ctr
Productivity gains (risk-adjusted)
$142,515
$265,486
$442,649
Three-year total: $850,649
Three-year present value: $681,537
Unquantified Benefits
Additional benefits that customers experienced but were not quantified for this study include:
Data security. Interviewees consistently highlighted data security as a key benefit. They valued that Dash worked exclusively with their company’s own data and integrated only with authorized applications, avoiding the external exposure risks created by other AI tools. Data governance and permission management capabilities accelerated team productivity.
Higher-quality output for deliverables. Dash improved the quality of deliverables by giving users access to richer historical examples. This enabled them to produce more consistent, informed proposals and stronger storytelling about company capabilities and customer outcomes. Dash also let interviewees’ sales reps instantly query documentation, rate cards, and client preferences, which helped them maintain consistency in client communications and pricing and reduced errors that could erode customer trust.
Improved employee experience. Interviewees said they felt more confident in the work Dash helped them produce, citing more accurate outputs, more thorough deliverables, and far less frustration in the process. Dash also strengthened collaboration and trust among individuals, teams, and geographies, helping users take greater pride in their work
Faster onboarding. Dash accelerated onboarding by giving new hires the tools they needed to hit the ground running, without relying on HR to navigate unfamiliar workflows or processes. Interviewees said they appreciated being able to build collections of information that helped new hires get up to speed quickly and build autonomy from day one.
Better enablement of remote work. Modern workforces operate as distributed global teams; Dash helped these groups work together more efficiently by giving them faster access to information through a centralized, searchable knowledge base. This capability also expanded organizations’ ability to hire talent from multiple geographies.
“Dash changed how we are looking at onboarding. We created Stacks, so new hires can query all day without knocking on someone else’s door.”
CEO, advertising
“The security piece of it is really paramount to us because we know we’re not putting stuff into an environment where that’s going to be scraped for external use.”
CRO, publishing
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Dash and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
The value of additional and upcoming functionality. Dash’s flexibility includes its ability to support and integrate with existing and future technologies. Interviewees expected Dash to connect to additional applications, enhancing future workflows and productivity.
The value of additional users of Dash across the enterprise. Interviewees anticipated expanding access to Dash to users in other roles and departments, which would likely result in net-new benefits to these users as well as higher productivity benefits from existing users due to increased collaboration.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
“Where Dash comes in really handy, over and above any other kind of AI tool, is that it sits on top of our existing systems, so it’s not adding anything extra; it’s just making our existing systems better and more accessible.”
Group IT manager, construction
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref.
Cost
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Dtr
Dropbox Dash fees
$0
$22,050
$66,150
$132,300
$220,500
$174,114
Etr
Internal costs
$0
$13,860
$41,580
$83,160
$138,600
$109,443
Total costs (risk-adjusted)
$0
$35,910
$107,730
$215,460
$359,100
$283,557
Dropbox Dash Fees
Evidence and data. Interviewees described zero initial setup costs for Dash. Organizations paid a subscription fee for Dash on a per-user per-month basis, with the list price set at $35 per user per month. This cost structure allowed organizations to scale their investment as the number of users and the pace of deployment increased.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester makes the following assumption: The composite deploys Dash to an initial set of 50 users across different roles in Year 1, expanding to 150 users in Year 2 and 300 users in Year 3.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The costs will vary depending on:
Fluctuation in subscription fees.
Unexpected increases or decreases in user adoption.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $174,000.
“If Dash saved me 1 hour for the whole month, that just paid for the whole tool itself. Now I’m saving 1 to 2 hours a day.”
Director of IT, sporting goods manufacturer
Dropbox Dash Fees
Ref.
Metric
Source
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
D1
Total users
Composite
50
150
300
D2
Cost per user per month
Composite
$35
$35
$35
Dt
Dropbox Dash fees
D1*D2*12
$0
$21,000
$63,000
$126,000
Risk adjustment
↑5%
Dtr
Dropbox Dash fees (risk-adjusted)
$0
$22,050
$66,150
$132,300
Three-year total: $220,500
Three-year present value: $174,114
Internal Costs
Evidence and data. Setup time for Dash was nearly instantaneous, according to all of the interviewees.
Administrators managed Dash licenses on a team and individual user basis.
Teams conducted training sessions with departments given access to Dash throughout the year. The Group IT manager at a construction organization said, “Dash is easy to use, so we focused the training on prompt engineering and competency development.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization: The composite organization has one to three administrator licenses for managing the assignment of individual user access to Dash. The composite holds department-level training sessions for setup, enablement, and introduction of new Dash features throughout the year.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
The organization’s dedication to training users and the variation of training time provided to roles based on usage.
The size and complexity of the company’s environment, which may require more onboarding and ongoing training for users.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $109,000.
Internal Costs
Ref.
Metric
Source
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
E1
Total users
D1
50
150
300
E2
Training hours per year
Interviews
3
3
3
E3
Average fully burdened hourly salary for a Dash user
Interviews
$88
$88
$88
Et
Internal costs
E1*E2*E3
$13,200
$39,600
$79,200
Risk adjustment
↑5%
Etr
Internal costs (risk-adjusted)
$0
$13,860
$41,580
$83,160
Three-year total: $138,600
Three-year present value: $109,443
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costsTotal benefitsCumulative net benefitsInitialYear 1Year 2Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Total costs
$0
($35,910)
($107,730)
($215,460)
($359,100)
($283,557)
Total benefits
$0
$226,215
$351,886
$531,749
$1,109,849
$895,976
Net benefits
$0
$190,305
$244,156
$316,289
$750,749
$612,419
ROI
216%
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Dash.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Dash can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Dropbox stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Dash.
Interviews
Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Dash to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Composite Organization
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Endnotes
1Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
[CONTENT]
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Dropbox and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Dash. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Dash based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Dropbox or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Dropbox and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Dropbox make no warranties of any kind.
Dropbox reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Dropbox provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Carrie Hogan
Published
April 2026
The Total Economic Impact™ Of Dropbox Dash
This study is commissioned by Dropbox and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.