Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Cisco Duo
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Cisco, June 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Cisco, June 2025
Today, identity and access management (IAM) is more critical than ever as organizations face rising threats from phishing, ransomware, and vulnerabilities from cloud misconfiguration. Businesses must balance security with agility, ensuring seamless access for employees, partners, and customers. A modern IAM solution enables phishing-resistant authentication, automates identity lifecycle management, and supports Zero Trust — boosting security, compliance, and operational efficiency.1
Cisco Duo is a leading IAM solution that takes a security-first approach to address modern identity-based threats without compromising usability. It delivers comprehensive protection through security-first identity, end-to-end phishing resistance, and unified identity intelligence. Organizations can use Duo as a stand-alone identity provider, with flexibility for it to serve as their primary directory or seamlessly integrate with existing identity infrastructures. This solution empowers organizations to safeguard their users, data, and systems with advanced security tools, all while ensuring an intuitive and efficient user experience.
Cisco commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Cisco Duo.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Cisco Duo on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed seven decision-makers with experience using Cisco Duo. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a global organization with 10,000 FTEs and $2.5 billion annual revenue.
Interviewees said that prior to using Cisco Duo, their organizations struggled with security gaps, operational inefficiencies, and compliance challenges. Without a solution for centralized IAM, the interviewees’ organizations faced a range of persistent and costly security vulnerabilities, operational inefficiencies, and compliance burdens, creating a complex and often fragile environment for IT and security teams.
After the investment in Cisco Duo, the interviewees shared how it became a cornerstone of their identity-based cybersecurity strategies, helping their organizations strengthen security by closing identity gaps and improving visibility into user access across devices and locations. By providing visibility into who was logging in, from where, and with what device, Duo built resilience against unauthorized access and multi-factor authentication (MFA) targeting attacks, helping teams identify and address weak points in their authentication landscape across all applications. Operationally, Duo enabled the organizations to scale and improve their security posture without overburdening internal teams. By offloading authentication and simplifying infrastructure, Duo enabled scalable protection with efficiencies for teams across security operations; IAM; and governance, risk, and compliance (GRC), as well as a streamlined end-user experience resulting in significant productivity improvements.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Reduced costs of a credentials-related security breach by 60%. Cisco Duo delivers measurable improvements in breach prevention, identity security, threat detection, and operational efficiency. Its layered approach to access control and device verification helps the composite not only reduce the likelihood of a breach but also minimize the potential damage if one were to occur. The value of this reduced risk to the composite is $1.6 million.
Improved end-user productivity, saving FTEs 137,500 hours. Duo helps reduce login friction and simplify onboarding for the composite organization, enabling consistent access across applications. End users who once had to manage numerous logins now enjoy a consistent, simplified experience across all clients, web-based apps, and browsers, empowering them to get to work faster and stay productive with fewer interruptions. The accumulated value of this improved productivity to the composite is $4.7 million.
Saved incident response time of more than 5,000 total hours. Cisco Duo empowers incident response teams to work smarter, not harder. By automating identity risk assessments, reducing false positives, and providing actionable visibility, Duo allows teams to focus on real threats, respond faster, and maintain a stronger security posture across the board. Overall, Cisco Duo reduces the composite’s authentication-related incident response effort by 50% for total time savings valued at $276,000.
Gained IAM efficiencies totaling more than 3,800 hours. Cisco Duo enables the composite to simplify user provisioning, scale securely, and maintain strong administrative oversight — delivering measurable efficiencies across the IAM lifecycle. The value of these efficiencies to the composite is $205,000.
Optimized GRC with a 20% reduction in cyber insurance premiums. Cisco Duo helps the composite organization navigate the complex compliance and cyber insurance landscape. By enabling MFA, providing audit-ready evidence, and supporting insurer confidence, Duo helps reduce cyber insurance premiums while improving GRC teams’ ability to provide fast and comprehensive reporting. The value of these savings and efficiencies to the composite is $89,800.
Optimized IT help desk processes, eliminating 1,800 authentication-related support tickets. Duo’s streamlined process for granting application access, combined with the reduction in password resets and account unlocks, helps the composite organization ease pressure on its IT support function. Overall, adopting Duo leads to substantial time savings for the IT help desk. The value of this optimization to the composite is $28,000.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Simplified ID and security environment.
An identity-first security culture.
Time savings reallocated to higher-value activities.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Cisco Duo. The composite uses the Duo Advantage edition, charged on a flat, per user per month basis. These costs increase slightly year over year with organic growth in FTEs. Cisco Duo fees total $1,851,000 for the composite.
Implementation and management. With Duo’s moderate learning curve and the value of Duo Care premium support, the composite organization experiences low internal implementation and management costs, which total $357,000.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $6.6 million over three years versus costs of $2.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $4.4 million and an ROI of 198%.
Reduction in end-user time spent on authentication over three years with Duo
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
| Role | Industry | Region | Number of users |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senior VP of IT | Healthcare | North America HQ and operations | 15,000+ |
| Cybersecurity leader | Healthcare | North America HQ and operations | 5,000 to 9,999 |
| Cybersecurity engineer | Real estate | North America HQ and operations | 1,000 to 4,999 |
| Infrastructure and security manager | Financial services | North America HQ, global operations | 1,000 to 4,999 |
| Information security leader | Retail | Europe HQ and operations | 1,000 to 4,999 |
| IT security manager | Transportation | North America HQ and operations | 1,000 to 4,999 |
| CISO | Technology services | North America HQ, global operations | >500 |
The interviewees came from organizations facing a complex and evolving security landscape marked by credential theft, operational inefficiencies, and compliance failures. They shared how Cisco Duo helped their organizations address critical pain points across their environments. Interviewees’ journeys reflected a common arc: from fragmented, high-risk systems to unified, secure, and efficient IAM postures with Cisco Duo.
Although they varied in industry, size, and region, interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Credentials-related security risks and associated costs. Interviewees who used an MFA provider in their prior environment discussed how their organizations inconsistently applied weak MFA processes, especially for critical systems like VPNs or administrative tools. They described how users were heavily reliant on passwords as the primary method of authentication, leaving them vulnerable to phishing attacks, credential theft, and brute-force intrusions. In many cases, the lack of robust authentication controls meant that a single compromised password could grant access to multiple systems, increasing the risk of lateral movement and costly data breaches. The financial exposure was significant, with potential breach costs estimated in the millions due to the sensitivity of the data involved — ranging from personal financial records to healthcare information.
SecOps productivity impediments. Security operations teams were often hampered by fragmented authentication systems and limited visibility into user activity. Logs were dispersed across platforms, making it difficult to detect anomalies or respond to threats in a timely manner. Manual processes dominated access control and incident response workflows, with a lack of centralized control and automation that created bottlenecks in threat detection and response.
User management complexity. Managing user identities and access across a growing digital estate was a major operational burden for the interviewees’ IAM teams. Interviewees noted that — depending on the application or department — their organizations often used a patchwork of authentication methods, ranging from passwords and SMS codes to hardware tokens and email-based verification. This inconsistency led to confusion among users and inefficiencies for IT teams. Provisioning and deprovisioning users was largely manual, increasing the risk of error and misconfiguration. As organizations grew, the lack of a standardized approach to identity management became increasingly unsustainable, especially when onboarding new users or integrating new systems.
Productivity drag for end users and slow onboarding for new users. Interviewees discussed how their organizations were growing, but authenticating to access basic services was slow and cumbersome. Without streamlined provisioning and authentication workflows, new employees faced delays in gaining access to the tools and systems they needed to be productive.
GRC inefficiencies and cyber insurance challenges. The lack of centralized visibility and control over user access hindered GRC teams. Organizations struggled to produce accurate audit trails, enforce consistent policies, and demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. Interviewees shared how cyber insurance providers increasingly demanded proof of strong authentication practices, and failure to meet these requirements led to higher premiums or reduced coverage. Manual reporting processes consumed significant time and introduced the risk of errors, making it difficult for organizations to stay ahead of evolving compliance standards.
IT help desk inefficiencies. In their organizations’ prior environments, support requests related to password resets, MFA setup issues, and access problems inundated help desks. These repetitive tasks consumed disproportionate time and resources, diverting attention from more strategic initiatives. The complexity of managing multiple authentication systems further compounded the problem. Users frequently encountered friction during login processes, leading to frustration and increased reliance on IT support. In environments with thousands of users, minor inefficiencies scaled into significant operational costs.
The interviewees’ organizations selected Duo due to its ease of use for end users and administrators and its high level of security. The interviewees described how their organizations deployed Cisco Duo across the security team for compliance, MFA, single sign-on (SSO) integration, and threat detection. The interviewees pointed to key drivers for their organizations’ Cisco Duo investment, including its:
Advanced protections for credentials-related threats. Duo gave organizations the ability to combine user and device context, helping move toward a Zero Trust security model. Duo’s early support for device-based authentication and posture checks provided an additional layer of security beyond traditional MFA.
Ease of use for end users. The end-user experience was a key differentiator. Teams appreciated that Duo’s design minimized disruption to users while maintaining strong security, which helped drive adoption across departments.
Time-saving integrations and automations across SecOps, IAM, and GRC-related roles. Interviewees noted that Cisco Duo’s user interface had a more intuitive design that was easier to use compared to other solutions they had decommissioned or tested. Organizations found Duo’s interface to be clean and user-friendly, which made it easier to manage user enrollment and ongoing administration. Compared to other MFA solutions they evaluated, Duo was perceived as simpler to configure and faster to deploy.
Ability to elevate standing with cyber insurers and compliance regimes. Organizations used Duo to enforce policies based on device trust, ensuring that only secure and compliant endpoints could access sensitive systems. This capability was especially important for meeting cyber insurance requirements and reducing exposure to credential-based attacks.
Wide breadth of well-documented, easy-to-deploy integrations. Interviewees also shared that Cisco Duo had a wide range of desired integrations with easy deployments, ensuring secure scaling into the cloud alongside organizational growth. Duo was selected for its ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide range of SaaS and on-premises applications and VPNs. The platform supported cloud and hybrid environments, allowing organizations to scale securely as they expanded. Teams valued the out-of-the-box support for many third-party tools, which reduced the need for custom development or complex configurations.
Duo’s Adaptive Roadmap: Leading-Edge Identity Security
Interviewees highlighted how Duo has evolved to include powerful new capabilities including Passwordless, Duo Passport, Duo Desktop, and Duo Push. These enhancements, combined with Duo’s core MFA and SSO, helped ensure that only secure, managed devices could access company resources — while providing a consistent, mobile-friendly login experience across all applications.
Passwordless. The interviewees that had deployed Passwordless Authentication highlighted how it boosted Duo’s ease of access while being more secure than a traditional password.
Duo Desktop. Interviewees discussed the value of deploying the Duo Desktop application for verifying the user’s identity and their device’s security posture before granting access.
Duo Passport. Interviewees noted that Duo Passport streamlined application access by remembering device sessions between applications, which helped diminish login fatigue.
Duo Push. Duo’s verified push feature helped some organizations eliminate MFA fatigue and unauthorized access, further enhancing productivity when deployed. Interviewees said that Duo Push stood out as a sleek, user-friendly alternative to clunky legacy tokens, offering seamless mobile access without the need for biometrics or hardware keys. Its built-in SSO tier eliminated the need for separate providers, simplifying identity management at scale. Unlike their legacy MFA tools with limited MFA controls, interviewees said that Duo delivered fine-grained customization that was elegant and easy.
Cisco Identity Intelligence. When paired with Cisco Identity Intelligence, Duo enabled real-time visibility into user login behavior and helped organizations improve their overall identity posture.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The global organization generates $2.5 billion in annual revenue and maintains $150 million in cybersecurity insurance coverage. It has 10,000 FTE users, growing to 12,000 by Year 3. The composite has three FTEs dedicated to detection and response, two FTEs dedicated to IAM, and one FTE dedicated to GRC.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization deploys the Cisco Duo Advantage subscription with Duo Care to its 10,000 users in Year 1. This grows to 11,000 users in Year 2 and 12,000 users by Year 3.
$2.5 billion annual revenue
10,000 users, growing to 12,000 by Year 3
Duo Advantage subscription with Duo Care
$150 million in cybersecurity insurance coverage
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Reduced costs of a credentials-related security breach | $559,490 | $683,822 | $745,987 | $1,989,299 | $1,634,241 |
| Btr | Improved end-user productivity | $1,599,994 | $1,760,006 | $1,920,000 | $5,280,000 | $4,351,615 |
| Ctr | Incident response time savings | $90,575 | $116,454 | $129,393 | $336,422 | $275,799 |
| Dtr | IAM efficiencies | $69,009 | $86,261 | $94,888 | $250,159 | $205,317 |
| Etr | GRC optimization | $24,970 | $39,493 | $45,868 | $110,331 | $89,800 |
| Ftr | IT help desk optimization | $8,460 | $11,475 | $13,860 | $33,795 | $27,588 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $2,352,499 | $2,697,511 | $2,949,996 | $8,000,005 | $6,584,360 |
Evidence and data. Although interviewees came from organizations across industries, all found significant value in using Cisco Duo to reduce the risk and potential cost of a material data breach. Duo’s threat detection capabilities leveraged machine learning to improve security teams’ ability to spot potential ongoing attack attempts. Furthermore, by blocking lateral movement and securing sensitive systems, Duo effectively disrupted the attack chain and enhanced overall cyber resilience. Interviewees shared how Duo decreased the likelihood of credentials-related cyberattacks by helping their organizations:
Combine user and device authentication for layered protection. Interviewees discussed how Duo’s layered defenses helped prevent unauthorized access to critical resources. These defenses included adaptive, phishing-resistant MFA using FIDO2 (WebAuthn); SSO; Passwordless; risk-based authentication; device verification; and conditional access policies. Duo helped interviewees’ security teams protect against stolen credentials and account takeovers by enforcing strict access controls and allowing only secure, authorized devices to reach sensitive systems. Interviewees reported an estimated 60% improvement in their organizations’ ability to mitigate these threats, while Duo’s detailed logging enabled rapid detection of identity-based attacks, accelerating response to these incidents.
Reduce their attack surface. The interviewees discussed how Duo helped their IT team reduce the number of apps that were unmanaged or failing to meet security policies and standards.
Eliminate key attack vectors and prevent lateral movement. The interviewees noted that Duo helped prevent attacks and privilege escalation from common vectors by only allowing users with trusted endpoints to authenticate. It also played a critical role in defending against sophisticated threats like business email compromise and man-in-the-middle attacks, making it significantly harder for attackers to impersonate users or hijack sessions, even in scenarios involving help desk interactions or stolen tokens.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Based on Forrester Research’s data for organizations with $2 billion to $5 billion in revenue, the average breach cost for the composite organization is $3.27 million.
The estimated likelihood of experiencing a breach is 68%.
Seventy percent of breaches are considered addressable by Cisco Duo.
The reduction in risk exposure due to Duo improves from 45% in Year 1 to 60% in Year 3.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The prevalence, nature, and average cost of data breaches in an organization’s industry.
The volume and type of data breached.
The geographic scope of operations.
The regulatory and compliance measures an organization is required to follow.
An organization’s prior state and maturity level for security operations.
The prior authentication software.
The extent to which an organization leverages Duo’s capabilities.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million.
Reduced risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks with Cisco Duo
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Cumulative cost of breaches for the composite | Forrester research | $3,265,000 | $3,265,000 | $3,265,000 | |
| A2 | Likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches for the composite | Forrester research | 68% | 68% | 68% | |
| A3 | Percentage of breaches originating from external attacks targeting organizations or remote environments, internal incidents, attacks, or incidents involving the external ecosystem | Forrester research | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| A4 | Annual risk exposure addressable with Cisco Duo | A1*A2*A3 | $1,554,140 | $1,554,140 | $1,554,140 | |
| A5 | Reduced risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks with Cisco Duo | Interviews | 45% | 55% | 60% | |
| At | Reduced costs of a credentials-related security breach | A4*A5 | $699,363 | $854,777 | $932,484 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Atr | Reduced costs of a credentials-related security breach (risk-adjusted) | $559,490 | $683,822 | $745,987 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,989,299 | Three-year present value: $1,634,241 | |||||
Evidence and data. Across the interviewees’ organizations, Cisco Duo emerged as a key enabler of smoother, faster end-user experiences. Rather than slowing users down with cumbersome login processes, Duo helped mitigate friction and streamline authentication in ways that directly improved productivity. This not only saved end users time but also reduced cognitive load and frustration. Whether it was reducing the time it took to log in, simplifying access across multiple applications, or minimizing disruptions during the workday, Duo allowed users to focus more on their tasks and less on navigating security barriers. This benefit had multiple value drivers, including:
Ease of use with SSO and other features. The implementation of SSO, Duo Desktop, and passwordless authentication allowed users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials and ensure quicker subsequent logins. Passwordless authentication provided additional savings and convenience, reducing the time spent on login processes. Duo’s passwordless access eliminated the need to repeatedly enter credentials. Passport and Duo Desktop features also helped reduce repeated authentication prompts by leveraging secure tokens.
A significant reduction in login time. One of the most immediate Duo benefits reported was optimizing a secure end-user experience, which streamlined daily operations and enhanced productivity. Previously, users faced cumbersome login procedures that required multiple steps and considerable time. With Duo, the authentication process became swift and seamless, reducing the time spent on logins by 75%. This efficiency allowed users to remain focused and eliminated the need to leave their workspace to retrieve authentication codes; thus, they could focus more on their tasks.
Improved time to productivity for new users. Duo also accelerated the onboarding period by decreasing the time it took for newly onboarded employees to become productive. The consistent onboarding experience across applications became a key enabler of business agility for the interviewees’ organizations.
Less end-user time spent waiting for support. Interviewees described how Duo helped automate the user provisioning lifecycle (see IAM Efficiencies) leading to fewer manual errors in the process. This meant that new and existing users had fewer authentication-related issues requiring support, while improved authentication-related context meant support staff were able to shorten the time end users spent waiting for support.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The model assumes between 10,000 and 12,000 users, each performing 500 authentications per year.
Before Duo, each authentication took 1.5 minutes; with Duo, this time drops to 0.5 minutes.
End users recapture 50% of these time savings for productive work.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for an end user is $48.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The number of end users.
The average number of authentications per end user each year.
The nature of the prior authentication solution.
Prevailing local compensation rates.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.4 million.
Reduction in end-user time spent on authentication over three years with Duo
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Number of end users | Composite | 10,000 | 11,000 | 12,000 | |
| B2 | Average number of authentications per end user each year | Interviews | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
| B3 | End-user time spent on each authentication prior to Duo (minutes) | Interviews | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | |
| B4 | End-user time spent on each authentication with Duo (minutes) | Interviews | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| B5 | Subtotal: Total annual end-user time savings (hours) | (B1*B2*(B3-B4))/60 | 83,333 | 91,667 | 100,000 | |
| B6 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an end user | Composite | $48 | $48 | $48 | |
| B7 | End-user productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Bt | Improved end-user productivity | B5*B6*B7 | $1,999,992 | $2,200,008 | $2,400,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Btr | Improved end-user productivity (risk-adjusted) | $1,599,994 | $1,760,006 | $1,920,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $5,280,000 | Three-year present value: $4,351,615 | |||||
Evidence and data. Organizations across industries reported that Cisco Duo significantly enhanced the productivity and responsiveness of their security operations teams. By improving visibility, reducing investigation time, and streamlining authentication processes, Duo enabled teams to act faster and more effectively when incidents occurred. In particular, interviewees reported how Cisco Duo helped their organizations:
Automate critical security steps. Interviewees described how Duo significantly reduced the time required for security investigations by automating risk-based authentication assessments and providing better visibility into login activities. These automations allowed security teams to skip unnecessary steps and focus on critical issues, saving valuable time. Overall, these time-saving automations enabled security operations teams to work more efficiently and effectively, focusing on genuine threats and improving the organization’s security posture.
Risk-based authentication. Duo’s risk-based authentication and visibility features were repeatedly highlighted as key enablers of faster, more confident decision-making based on rapidly changing risk factors.
Lower false positives. Another major area of improvement was reducing false positives and unnecessary escalations. With Duo’s detailed authentication logs and integration with Cisco Identity Intelligence, service desks and SOC teams could quickly determine whether login issues were authentication-related or due to other system problems. The streamlined authentication process also minimized the occurrence of false positives, reducing the time spent on investigating nonissues.
Decrease investigation times. Together, the impacts above led to a significant reduction in security investigation time. Teams that previously had to perform multiple manual steps to verify user activity — such as checking device logs or querying security information and event management (SIEM) systems — found that Duo provided near-instant answers.
Reduce account takeovers. Interviewees shared that their teams also reported a significant drop in account takeover incidents. In their prior environment, their SecOps teams were handling a significant daily volume of account takeovers. With Duo’s SSO, MFA, and other capabilities, however, account takeovers required minimal effort, if any at all.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization dedicates 4,992 hours per year to incident response.
With Duo, the composite reduces its incident response effort by 40% in Year 1, increasing to 55% in Year 3.
Technical resources recapture 80% of time savings for productive work.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a technical resource is $72.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The nature of the prior authentication solution.
IT staff experience and capabilities.
The maturity of an organization’s security operations.
The extent to which an organization leverages Duo’s capabilities.
Prevailing local compensation rates.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $276,000.
Identity-related incident response time savings with Cisco Duo
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Total hours dedicated to incident response in the prior environment | Composite | 4,992 | 4,992 | 4,992 | |
| C2 | Percentage reduction in effort dedicated to incident response with Cisco Duo | Interviews | 35% | 45% | 50% | |
| C3 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a technical resource | Composite | $72 | $72 | $72 | |
| C4 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| Ct | Incident response time savings | C1*C2*C3*C4 | $100,639 | $129,393 | $143,770 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Incident response time savings (risk-adjusted) | $90,575 | $116,454 | $129,393 | ||
| Three-year total: $336,422 | Three-year present value: $275,799 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that their organizations had inconsistent, often manual IAM practices in their prior environments. They often distributed user management responsibilities across business users who were also app owners, rather than consolidate them through a secure IT function. Deploying Cisco Duo significantly streamlined their IAM processes, particularly in the areas of user provisioning, scalability, and administrative control. These efficiencies not only saved time but also improved security posture and operational agility. Interviewees pointed out how Duo IAM automations helped:
Improve administrative control and visibility. Interviewees described how Duo’s adaptive access policies gave IAM teams the ability to manage access privileges with newfound granularity based on role, device, location, and many other contextual factors.
Optimize user provisioning lifecycle. Interviewees described how adding a user to a Duo group could instantly provision access to applications, eliminating the need to create and manage separate credentials, saving on per-user setup time and reducing the risk of forgotten passwords and the need for ongoing maintenance.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization dedicates 3,328 hours per year to IAM.
Effort reduction improves from 40% in Year 1 to 55% in Year 3.
Technical resources recapture 80% of time savings for productive work.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a technical resource is $72.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The nature of the prior authentication solution.
IT staff experience and capabilities.
The maturity of an organization’s security operations.
The extent to which an organization leverages Duo’s capabilities.
Prevailing local compensation rates.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $205,000.
Percentage reduction in effort dedicated to IAM with Cisco Duo
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Total hours dedicated to IAM in the prior environment | Composite | 3,328 | 3,328 | 3,328 | |
| D2 | Percentage reduction in effort dedicated to IAM with Cisco Duo | Interviews | 40% | 50% | 55% | |
| D3 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an IAM resource | Composite | $72 | $72 | $72 | |
| D4 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| Dt | IAM efficiencies | D1*D2*D3*D4 | $76,677 | $95,846 | $105,431 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | IAM efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $69,009 | $86,261 | $94,888 | ||
| Three-year total: $250,159 | Three-year present value: $205,317 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees noted how their organizations were under increasing pressure to demonstrate compliance with regulation requirements and governance policies. As cyber threats evolved, breaches occurred for some organizations in their prior environments, and insurers raised their standards across sectors. Interviewees shared that Cisco Duo played a critical role in helping their organizations meet these rising expectations. They reported a range of ways in which this manifested, particularly in the areas of cyber insurance eligibility, cost savings, and compliance reporting, as well as meeting customer expectations on security. In particular, they highlighted their organizations’:
Improved ability to provide evidence and reporting. Duo helped organizations demonstrate compliance and provide evidence of security controls — a growing requirement as they noted insurers, regulators, and even customers were raising the bar on their standards. Compared to their prior environments, where gathering evidence and reporting was overly burdensome, interviewees noted how Duo made it easier to share SOC evidence on MFA.
Better standing with cyber insurers. Although interviewees saw Duo as foundational to qualifying for cyber insurance, one of the most striking outcomes was its direct financial impact on cyber insurance premiums. Duo contributed to maintaining insurer confidence, and in some cases led to more favorable rates.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Cyber insurance premiums are set at $150,000 annually, with savings increasing from 10% to 20% over three years.
GRC efforts total 1,664 hours annually, with a 15% to 25% reduction in effort for the composite.
Technical resources recapture 80% of time savings for productive work.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a technical resource is $72.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The nature of the prior authentication solution.
IT staff experience and capabilities.
The maturity of an organization’s security operations.
The extent to which an organization leverages Duo’s capabilities.
Prevailing local compensation rates.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $90,000.
Percentage reduction in cyber insurance premiums with Cisco Duo
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Cyber insurance premiums in the prior environment | Composite | $150,000 | $150,000 | $150,000 | |
| E2 | Percentage reduction in cyber insurance premiums with Cisco Duo | Interviews | 10% | 15% | 20% | |
| E3 | Subtotal: Savings on cyber insurance premiums with Cisco Duo | E1*E2 | $15,000 | $22,500 | $30,000 | |
| E4 | Total hours dedicated to GRC in the prior environment | Composite | 1,664 | 1,664 | 1,664 | |
| E5 | Percentage reduction in effort dedicated to GRC with Cisco Duo | Interviews | 15% | 25% | 25% | |
| E6 | Productivity recapture | TEI Methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| E7 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a GRC resource | Composite | $72 | $72 | $72 | |
| E8 | Subtotal: GRC optimization | E4*E5*E6*E7 | $14,377 | $23,962 | $23,962 | |
| Et | GRC optimization | E3+E8 | $29,377 | $46,462 | $53,962 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Etr | GRC optimization (risk-adjusted) | $24,970 | $39,493 | $45,868 | ||
| Three-year total: $110,331 | Three-year present value: $89,800 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees detailed how their IT help desk functions gained better visibility and clarity into authentication issues after adopting Duo. This lowered support costs and optimized productivity for end users and IT staff alike. Automated workflows in the provisioning lifecycle reduced the potential for errors and misconfigurations that often served as the bulk of support requests in the prior environment. Key value drivers for this benefit included:
Reduction in credentials-related support issues. Organizations saw a reduction in the number of IT tickets related to authentication issues, with monthly ticket volumes dropping significantly.
Faster troubleshooting and resolution times. Another key area of improvement was in the time taken to resolve IT tickets. The ability to check and unlock accounts quickly through Duo streamlined the process, reducing the burden on IT staff and minimizing downtime for users.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite addresses 1,200 authentication-related help desk tickets per year, each taking 15 minutes to resolve.
With Duo, the composite reduces ticket volume by 40% to 60% and reduces resolution time by 25% to 50%.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a help desk resource is $50.
Risks. The following risks may impact this benefit:
The nature of the prior authentication solution.
Help desk staff experience and capabilities.
The extent to which an organization leverages Duo’s capabilities.
Prevailing local compensation rates.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $28,000.
Percentage reduction in annual authentication-related IT help desk tickets with Duo
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Total annual authentication-related IT help desk tickets in the prior environment | Composite | 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,200 | |
| F2 | Percentage reduction in annual authentication-related IT help desk tickets with Duo | Interviews | 40% | 50% | 60% | |
| F3 | Total annual authentication-related IT help desk tickets avoided with Duo | F1*F2 | 480 | 600 | 720 | |
| F4 | Total hours to investigate authentication-related IT help desk tickets in the prior environment | Composite | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| F5 | Subtotal: Total IT help desk hours avoided from reduced volume of authentication-related tickets with Duo | F3*F4 | 120 | 150 | 180 | |
| F6 | Total IT help desk tickets with Duo | F1-F5 | 1,080 | 1,050 | 1,020 | |
| F7 | Percentage reduction in time to resolve authentication-related IT help desk tickets with Duo | Interviews | 25% | 40% | 50% | |
| F8 | Total IT help desk hours avoided from reduced time to resolve authentication-related IT help desk tickets with Duo | F6*(F4*F7) | 68 | 105 | 128 | |
| F9 | Subtotal: Total IT help desk hours avoided with Duo | F5+F8 | 188 | 255 | 308 | |
| F10 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an IT help desk resource | Composite | $50 | $50 | $50 | |
| Ft | IT help desk optimization | F9*F10 | $9,400 | $12,750 | $15,400 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ftr | IT help desk optimization (risk-adjusted) | $8,460 | $11,475 | $13,860 | ||
| Three-year total: $33,795 | Three-year present value: $27,588 | |||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Simplified identity and security environment. Duo simplified the technology stack for the interviewees’ organizations by centralizing and streamlining authentication and log management technology. Duo replaced a fragmented mix of managed authentication tools and other unmanaged free solutions. This consolidation eliminated the complexity of supporting multiple tools and improved manageability and auditability.
An identity-first security culture. Interviewees described how their organization’s underlying growth strategy and security culture reoriented around identity security following Duo adoption.
Time savings reallocated to higher-value activities. By recentering identity security and management with IT, business and technical users often applied the productivity gains to higher-value activities.
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Cisco Duo and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Secure scalability and growth. Duo’s robust support and roadmap guidance helped organizations deploy adaptive security models, allowing them to scale users and applications. Duo also enabled quick and secure user onboarding while maintaining compliance with MFA policies. This approach offered greater administrative control and visibility, standardized SSO and MFA processes, and reduced MFA fatigue, making it easier for IT teams to manage credentials, enforce security policies, and monitor access effectively as their organizations experienced rapid organic growth via mergers and acquisitions.
Faster time to value with mergers and acquisitions. Multiple interviewees shared how the enhanced scalability and growth described above streamlined and accelerated their organizations’ mergers and acquisitions activities. By implementing MFA for their VPNs and traditional logins, IT staff could onboard users faster and with more secure authentication.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gtr | Cisco Duo | $0 | $680,400 | $748,440 | $816,480 | $2,245,320 | $1,850,524 |
| Htr | Implementation and management | $14,256 | $288,710 | $51,110 | $51,110 | $405,187 | $357,360 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $14,256 | $969,110 | $799,550 | $867,590 | $2,650,507 | $2,207,884 |
Evidence and data. Factors that impacted the organizations’ Cisco Duo fees included:
Cisco Duo edition. Interviewees had various configurations of Duo enabled, including the Duo Essentials, Duo Advantage, and Duo Premier editions.
Organizational growth. Interviewees noted licensing costs for Duo were charged on a flat, monthly, per user basis. Several organizations experienced organizational growth or had additional applications that they wanted to onboard to Duo following the initial implementation.
Duo Care. Some interviewees’ organizations found value in their Duo Care services agreement with Cisco.
Pricing may vary. Contact Cisco for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Annual license fees start at $540,000 and increase to $648,000 by Year 3.
Duo Care fees are 20% of Duo licensing, starting at $108,000 and growing to $129,600.
Risks. The following risks may impact this cost:
Number of accounts Duo protects.
Which edition of Duo an organization chooses.
Whether an organization selects Duo Care.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.9 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Cisco Duo Fees | Composite | $540,000 | $594,000 | $648,000 | |
| G2 | Duo Care | Composite | $108,000 | $118,800 | $129,600 | |
| Gt | Cisco Duo | G1+G2 | $648,000 | $712,800 | $777,600 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Gtr | Cisco Duo (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $680,400 | $748,440 | $816,480 | |
| Three-year total: $2,245,320 | Three-year present value: $1,850,524 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees described Duo as quick and straightforward to deploy, with low administrative burden and IT costs compared to their prior environment. The organizations implemented Duo using internal resources that included a project leader, network and server admins, and security admins, and guidance from their Duo Care team. Technical setup included determining requirements (e.g., for remote users connecting into internal applications); then configuring, deploying, and testing the Duo solution; and integrating it with key applications. Interviewees described their organizations’ implementation and management efforts, which included:
Deployment and integration processes. Interviewees detailed their organization’s rollout of Duo, the planning of which involved identifying all applications and setting up necessary infrastructure. Phased deployments allowed for testing and adjustments, leading to comprehensive organizational adoption with Duo at the center of a centralized, ID-based security strategy.
Training. Templates and guidance from Cisco Duo documentation and Duo Care teams (when engaged) provided the foundation for organizationwide change-management processes. End users familiarized themselves with Duo through videos, reading materials, or training staff if needed and subsequently enrolled their devices with Duo. Newly hired end users educated themselves using the training materials and consulted help desk staff if needed.
Roadmap discussions with Cisco. Many organizations engaged in regular roadmap discussions with their Cisco Duo team, fostering close relationships during and after implementation. Security-related IT staff managed and supported Duo, interfacing with Cisco to evaluate and optimize their use of Duo continually. They also handled projects such as onboarding new functions or exploring new use cases for Duo.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Technical deployment and management effort starts at 180 hours and increases to 312 hours annually.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for a technical resource is $72.
Each end user dedicates 30 minutes to Duo training and onboarding.
The average fully burdened hourly rate for an end-user resource is $48.
Risks. The following risks may impact this cost:
The number of end users.
IT staff experience and capabilities.
The maturity of an organization’s security operations.
The extent to which an organization leverages Duo’s capabilities.
Prevailing local compensation rates.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $357,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Total hours of Duo technical deployment and management effort per year | Interviews | 180 | 312 | 312 | 312 |
| H2 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a technical resource | Composite | $72 | $72 | $72 | $72 |
| H3 | Subtotal: Deployment and scaling | $12,960 | $22,464 | $22,464 | $22,464 | |
| H4 | Hours of Duo deployment effort per end user | Interviews | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| H5 | Total end users adopted | Composite | 0 | 10,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| H6 | End-user hourly rate | Composite | $48 | $48 | $48 | $48 |
| H7 | Subtotal: Total end-user adoption costs | H4*H5*H6 | $0 | $240,000 | $24,000 | $24,000 |
| Ht | Implementation and management | H3+H7 | $12,960 | $262,464 | $46,464 | $46,464 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Htr | Implementation and management (risk-adjusted) | $14,256 | $288,710 | $51,110 | $51,110 | |
| Three-year total: $405,187 | Three-year present value: $357,360 | |||||
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($14,256) | ($969,110) | ($799,550) | ($867,590) | ($2,650,507) | ($2,207,884) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $2,352,499 | $2,697,511 | $2,949,996 | $8,000,005 | $6,584,360 |
| Net benefits | ($14,256) | $1,383,388 | $1,897,960 | $2,082,405 | $5,349,498 | $4,376,476 |
| ROI | 198% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Cisco Duo.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Cisco Duo can have on an organization.
Interviewed Duo stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Cisco Duo.
Interviewed seven decision-makers at organizations using Cisco Duo to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
1 Source: The Top Trends Shaping Identity And Access Management In 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., March 6, 2025; Making The Business Case For Identity And Access Management, Forrester Research, Inc., March 20, 2025.
2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Cisco and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Cisco Duo. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Cisco Duo based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Cisco or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Cisco and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Cisco make no warranties of any kind.
Cisco Duo reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Cisco Duo provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Courtenay O’Connor
Alyssa Dolan
June 2025
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html