A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Charles, December 2024
In today’s perpetually connected world, the primary goal for e-commerce businesses is to drive profitable growth by acquiring new customers and nurturing existing ones. Achieving this requires a deep understanding of the customer and the ability to deliver highly relevant, personalized offers and messages. By personalizing communications and automating them through event-driven messaging, companies can send the right message at the right time via the right channel. WhatsApp is a powerful communication and sales channel that facilitates this level of engagement. The WhatsApp marketing platform from charles, with its focus on automation and personalization, enhances customer engagement and drives efficiency and growth for European e-commerce organizations.
Charles is a European WhatsApp marketing platform that helps brands automate and scale their marketing efforts, focusing on maximizing revenue per recipient, retaining customers, and ensuring GDPR compliance. Its key features are automated conversational flows and marketing campaigns. The charles platform enables seamless integrations with e-commerce platforms, CRM systems, customer service software, analytics tools, and messaging services to enhance marketing and customer experiences.
Charles commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying charles.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of charles on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed the e-commerce leader of a prominent fashion and apparel retailer who has experience using charles. Forrester used this experience to project a three-year financial analysis.
Prior to using charles, the interviewee noted that their organization used a legacy instant messaging (IM) platform solution. This couldn’t meet their need to execute large marketing and sales campaigns, leaving them with low-quality audience reach and system downtime issues. These limitations meant the retailer was unable to convert the audiences generated, resulting in dissatisfied customers and fewer transactions.
After the investment in charles, the interviewee’s organization was able to accomplish large marketing campaigns effectively via WhatsApp. Key results from the investment included improved engagement with customers, higher conversion rates, and increased subscriber growth, driving higher returns on marketing campaigns.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the interviewee’s organization include:
The interview and financial analysis found that the representative’s organization experiences benefits of €1.2 million over three years versus costs of €329,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of €820,000 and an ROI of 249%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in charles.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that charles can have on an organization.
Interviewed charles stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to charles.
Interviewed the representative of an organization using charles to obtain data with respect to costs, benefits, and risks.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interview using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewee.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by charles and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in charles.
Charles reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Charles provided the customer name for the interview but did not participate in the interview.
Consulting Team:
Stefanie Vollmer
Jan Sythoff
Forrester interviewed the representative of an organization who has experience using charles. Their organization has the following characteristics:
The interviewee noted that their company introduced WhatsApp marketing using a legacy solution but faced disappointing outcomes, including low engagement rates, poor technical stability and performance, and difficulties in converting customers due to the technical issues and limited personalization.
The interviewee noted that the organization struggled with common challenges, including:
The interviewee’s organization searched for a solution that could:
A prominent European online fashion retailer struggled with the poor performance of its outdated IM platform. The absence of segmentation and audience-building features as well as the lack of vendor support in creating the right campaign format led to low customer engagement rates and conversion challenges. To overcome these issues, the e-commerce retailer wanted a new software platform that could help it automate and scale its WhatsApp marketing efforts. It also needed the new vendor’s customer success team to support it in offering a personalized and inspiring shopping experience that would enhance revenue and customer engagement. The retailer decided to adopt charles’ software platform.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Improved customer engagement | €50,440 | €60,527 | €72,633 | €183,600 | €150,447 |
| Btr | Increased click-to-conversion rates | €141,475 | €169,770 | €203,724 | €514,969 | €421,981 |
| Ctr | Cost savings from decommissioning the legacy solution | €40,928 | €116,663 | €116,663 | €274,254 | €221,273 |
| Dtr | Subscriber growth | €84,105 | €172,415 | €181,036 | €437,556 | €354,966 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | €316,948 | €519,375 | €574,056 | €1,410,378 | €1,148,667 | |
Evidence and data. The CRM manager in e-commerce reported increased customer engagement on WhatsApp, driven by charles’ automated marketing sequences as well as the effective tailoring of offers to align with customers’ preferences. Enhanced customer engagement led to an increase in the number of customers moving into the sales funnel.
Modeling and assumptions. For the representative financial model, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Risks. The actual financial benefit will vary between organizations depending on the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €151,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Subscribers | Interview | 170,000 | 204,000 | 244,800 |
| A2 | Campaigns per year | Interview | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| A3 | Total messages sent using charles | A1*A2 | 1,020,000 | 1,224,000 | 1,468,800 |
| A4 | Average engagement rate of legacy IM solution | Interview | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| A5 | Improvement in engagement rate | Interview | 550% | 550% | 550% |
| A6 | Engagement rate with charles (rounded) | A4*(1+A5) | 39% | 39% | 39% |
| A7 | Subtotal: Additional engaged conversations when using charles | A3*(A6-A4) | 336,600 | 403,920 | 484,704 |
| A8 | Click-to-conversion rate of the legacy solution | Interview | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% |
| A9 | AOV of the legacy solution | Interview | €50 | €50 | €50 |
| A10 | Incremental revenue due to improved customer engagement | A7*A8*A9 | €555,390 | €666,468 | €799,762 |
| A11 | Operating margin | TEI methodology | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| At | Improved customer engagement | A10*A11 | €56,044 | €67,253 | €80,703 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Atr | Improved customer engagement (risk-adjusted) | €50,440 | €60,528 | €72,633 | |
| Three-year total: €183,600 | Three-year present value: €150,447 | ||||
Evidence and data. Once customers engaged with messages and content, the interviewee’s company saw higher rates of conversion with charles than with the organization’s legacy IM platform and alternative CRM channels. The interviewee highlighted that the higher conversion rates resulted from the personalization of message content and the ongoing cultivation of customer relationships.
Modeling and assumptions. For the representative financial model, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Risks. The actual financial benefit will vary between organizations depending on the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €422,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Total messages sent using charles | Interview | 1,020,000 | 1,224,000 | 1,468,800 |
| B2 | Engagement rate with charles | Interview | 39% | 39% | 39% |
| B3 | Click-to-conversion rate of the legacy solution | Interview | 3.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% |
| B4 | Increase in click-to-conversion rate with charles | Interview | 267% | 267% | 267% |
| B5 | Click-to-conversion rate with charles | B3*(1+B4) | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| B6 | Subtotal: Additional conversions with charles | B1*B2*(B5-B3) | 35,404 | 42,485 | 50,982 |
| B7 | AOV legacy solution | Interview | €50 | €50 | €50 |
| B8 | Revenue from additional conversions | B6*B7 | €1,768,450 | €2,122,150 | €2,546,550 |
| B9 | Operating margin | TEI methodology | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Bt | Increased click-to-conversion rates | B8*B9 | €176,845 | €212,215 | €254,655 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | ||||
| Btr | Increased click-to-conversion rates (risk-adjusted) | €141,476 | €169,772 | €203,724 | |
| Three-year total: €514,969 | Three-year present value: €421,981 | ||||
Evidence and data. The interviewee’s organization struggled with its legacy IM platform, which suffered from extensive system downtime. Technical mishaps proved to be time-consuming and costly to fix. The legacy vendor’s costs were also significantly higher than charles’ fees in the first year and would have continued to increase in subsequent years.
Modeling and assumptions. For the representative financial model, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Risks The actual financial benefit will vary between organizations depending on the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €221,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Annual fees for the legacy solution | Interview | €43,773 | €124,773 | €124,773 |
| C2 | Maintenance costs of legacy solution (assumed) | 10% | €4,377 | €12,477 | €12,477 |
| Ct | Cost savings from decommissioning the legacy solution | C1+C2 | €48,150 | €137,250 | €137,250 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||
| Ctr | Cost savings from decommissioning legacy solution (risk-adjusted) | €40,928 | €116,663 | €116,663 | |
| Three-year total: €274,254 | Three-year present value: €221,273 | ||||
Evidence and data. After implementing charles, the interviewee’s organization saw a significant increase in WhatsApp subscribers. The organization successfully leveraged charles’ platform by redirecting leads from other channels into WhatsApp with discount codes and exclusive content.
Modeling and assumptions. For the representative financial model, Forrester makes the following assumptions:
Risks. The actual financial benefit will vary between organizations depending on the following factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €355,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Total additional subscribers since implementing charles (average of period) | Interview | 86,500 | 177,325 | 186,192 |
| D2 | Campaigns per new subscriber | Interview | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| D3 | Additional conversations | D1*D2 | 519,000 | 1,063,950 | 1,117,152 |
| D4 | Engagement rate with charles | Interview | 39% | 39% | 39% |
| D5 | Additional engaged conversations by using charles | D3*D4 | 202,410 | 414,941 | 435,688 |
| D6 | Click-to-conversion rate with charles | Interview | 12.2% | 12.2% | 12.2% |
| D7 | Subtotal: Additional conversions with charles | D5*D6 | 24,694 | 50,623 | 53,154 |
| D8 | AOV with charles | Interview | €40 | €40 | €40 |
| D9 | Operating margin | TEI assumption | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| D10 | Incremental profit | D7*D8*D9 | €98,948 | €202,840 | €212,984 |
| Dt | Subscriber growth | D10 | €98,948 | €202,840 | €212,984 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||
| Dtr | Subscriber growth (risk-adjusted) | €84,106 | €172,414 | €181,036 | |
| Three-year total: €437,556 | Three-year present value: €354,966 | ||||
The interviewee mentioned the following additional benefits that the organization experienced but was not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement charles and later realize additional uses and business opportunities that allow for value creation along the entire customer journey, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etr | Vendor and third-party costs | €0 | €73,841 | €119,216 | €129,830 | €322,887 | €263,198 |
| Ftr | Implementation and maintenance costs | €804 | €26,125 | €26,125 | €26,125 | €79,179 | €65,773 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | €804 | €99,966 | €145,341 | €155,955 | €402,066 | €328,971 | |
Evidence and data. The pricing structure for the charles WhatsApp messaging platform includes an annual fixed fee and a fee per conversation. Conversation fees are driven by volume. Pricing may vary. Contact charles for more details.
Additionally, there are costs associated with WhatsApp Business Platform. WhatsApp Business Platform charges costs based on the number of conversations.2
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial model, Forrester calculated costs based on the following:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €263,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Vendor fees | Interview | €32,700 | €37,800 | €43,920 | |
| E2 | Third-party costs | Interview | €34,429 | €70,579 | €74,108 | |
| Et | Vendor and third-party costs | E1+E2 | €0 | €67,129 | €108,379 | €118,028 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Etr | Vendor and third-party costs (risk-adjusted) | €0 | €73,842 | €119,217 | €129,831 | |
| Three-year total: €322,887 | Three-year present value: €263,198 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewee’s company faced internal labor costs for both implementing and maintaining the charles WhatsApp messaging platform.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial model, Forrester calculated costs based on the following:
Risks. Risks that could affect the magnitude of this cost include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of €66,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Fully burdened annual salary for a senior CRM manager | Interview | €95,000 | €95,000 | €95,000 | €95,000 |
| F2 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a senior CRM manager | F1/2,080 | €46 | €46 | €46 | €46 |
| F3 | Implementation time (hours) | Interview | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F4 | Subtotal: Total implementation costs | F2*F3 | €736 | €0 | €0 | €0 |
| F5 | Time spent on maintenance (hours) | Interview | 0 | 520 | 520 | 520 |
| F6 | Subtotal: Total maintenance costs | F2*F5 | €0 | €23,750 | €23,750 | €23,750 |
| Ft | Implementation and maintenance costs | F4+F6 | €736 | €23,920 | €23,920 | €23,920 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Ftr | Implementation and maintenance costs (risk-adjusted) | €804 | €26,125 | €26,125 | €26,125 | |
| Three-year total: €79,179 | Three-year present value: €65,773 | |||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | (€804) | (€99,966) | (€145,341) | (€155,955) | (€402,066) | (€328,971) |
| Total benefits | €0 | €316,947 | €519,375 | €574,056 | €1,410,378 | €1,148,667 |
| Net benefits | (€804) | €216,981 | €374,034 | €418,101 | €1,008,312 | €819,696 |
| ROI | 249% | |||||
| Payback period (months) | <6 | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
2 For Meta’s fees, see the current rates and updated rates.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html