A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Attentive, February 2024
To effectively engage audiences, email marketers strive to deliver relevant and well-timed messages. However, as subscriber bases grow and customers get fatigued from receiving too many emails, marketers remain challenged to drive meaningful conversation. Today, marketing teams increasingly turn to automation to send emails at scale, increase subscriber engagement, and propel customer loyalty.
Attentive Email provides the data, automation, precise customer identification and custom tagging, and integrations marketers need to maximize email-driven revenue and to create efficiencies for marketing teams. Attentive dedicated support teams collaborate with marketers globally to define best practices for brands seeking to personalize and scale their email messaging programs.
Attentive commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Attentive Email.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Attentive Email on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six representatives of four organizations with experience using Attentive Email. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a retailer with $200 million in annual revenue, and 20% of which is driven by email. The composite has 1.5 million email subscribers in its legacy email marketing program, which grows 5% annually. Its average order value is $100, and its operating margin is 10%.
Interviewees said that prior to using Attentive Email, their organizations struggled to maximize revenue as a result of inaccurate subscriber tags and tracking codes as well as limited ability to reach particular audiences. Difficult-to-navigate platforms caused user errors, including inaccurate campaign scheduling and difficulty interpreting data reports. When searching for support — most notably during initial implementation and platform improvement phases — the organizations were unable to elicit timely responses from customer support teams at their previous email service providers (ESPs). As a result, the organizations were left to troubleshoot technical issues internally, which often required the efforts of thinly resourced teams.
After the investment in Attentive Email, the interviewees’ organizations realized incremental profits from triggered and campaign emails both through growth in subscriber lists and improvements to subscriber identification. The organizations also realized time savings around daily email marketing tasks, gained access to a collaborative and responsive customer support team, and unified their email and SMS communications under an orchestrated platform.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $1.54 million over three years versus costs of $502,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $1.04 million and an ROI of 207%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment Attentive Email.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Attentive Email can have on an organization.
Interviewed Attentive stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Attentive Email.
Interviewed six representatives at four organizations using Attentive Email to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Attentive and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Attentive Email.
Attentive reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Attentive provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Maria Kulikova
Sarah Lervold
| Role | Industry | Annual Revenue | Email List Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head of e-commerce | Retail: Apparel and fashion | $20M | 800,000 |
| Retention marketing manager | E-commerce: Consumer goods | $50M | 1,500,000 |
| Senior DTC manager | Retail: Health | $440M | 530,000 |
| Retention and CRM specialist | Retail: Health | $440M | 530,000 |
| Head of growth | Retail: Consumer goods | $44M | 298,000 |
| Owner, agency | Retail: Consumer goods | $44M | 298,000 |
Each interviewee said that prior to implementing Attentive Email, their organization deployed Attentive SMS Marketing and at least one legacy ESP. The organizations faced technical issues with inaccurate scheduling, segmenting, and targeting appropriate audiences for both campaign and triggered emails with their previous solutions. Interviewees recognized their organizations were unable to maximize revenue on their email marketing technology and also noted that email marketing teams struggled to communicate with the customer support teams of their previous ESPs, particularly during implementation and onboarding and to optimize use of the platform.
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that could:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the six interviewees, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization is a retailer with annual revenues of $200 million, and 20% of which are driven by email. The composite has 1.5 million email subscribers in its legacy ESP, and this number grows 5% annually. The average order value is $100, and its operating margin is 10%. The composite organization sends each subscriber three campaign emails per week.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization implements Attentive in four weeks and dedicates two additional weeks to the IP warming process. One email marketing manager and one director of marketing manage Attentive on an ongoing basis, and the email marketing manager receives 2 hours of initial training and meets with Attentive support on a biweekly basis to optimize use of the platform.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Profit from improved triggered email creation with improved subscriber identification and list growth | $124,950 | $349,629 | $569,626 | $1,044,205 | $830,509 |
| Btr | Campaign email profits from subscriber list growth | $13,923 | $179,010 | $614,601 | $807,534 | $622,358 |
| Ctr | Email marketing manager efficiencies | $36,146 | $36,146 | $36,146 | $108,439 | $89,890 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $175,019 | $564,785 | $1,220,373 | $1,960,178 | $1,542,757 | |
Evidence and data. The interviewees unanimously shared that revenue from triggered emails increased at their organizations since migrating to Attentive. They said this was critical because triggered emails comprise the majority of their organizations’ total email revenues. Interviewees also shared that their organizations improved their ability to understand subscribers’ behaviors and that interactions with their websites improved identification due to the Attentive custom tag being refreshed more often due to more traffic driven to brand websites from SMS. This ultimately increased the number of emails that are appropriately triggered to a subscriber’s inbox.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The impact of this benefit can vary among organizations based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $831,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Total email subscribers with legacy ESP (assuming 5% growth) | Composite | 1,500,000 | 1,575,000 | 1,653,750 |
| A2 | Net new email subscribers with Attentive | B4 | 300,000 | 675,000 | 1,158,750 |
| A3 | Average number of automated emails triggered per journey per subscriber with legacy ESP | Interviews | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 |
| A4 | Increase to automated emails triggered appropriately due to enhanced subscriber identification with Attentive | Interviews | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| A5 | Average number of automated journeys triggered by each subscriber | Assumption | 1.75 | 2.50 | 2.50 |
| A6 | Incremental triggered emails sent to legacy email subscribers | A1*((A3*(1+A4)- A3)*A5 | 3,281,250 | 4,921,875 | 5,167,969 |
| A7 | Triggered emails sent to new email subscribers | A2*A3(1+A4))*A5 | 1,312,500 | 4,218,750 | 7,242,188 |
| A8 | Subtotal: Total new emails sent through triggered journeys | A6+A7 | 4,593,750 | 9,140,625 | 12,410,156 |
| A9 | Triggered email unique open rate | Interviews | 40% | 45% | 45% |
| A10 | Triggered email click through rate | Interviews | 4% | 5% | 6% |
| A11 | Triggered email conversion rate | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| A12 | Average order value | Composite | $100 | $100 | $100 |
| A13 | Operating margin | Composite | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| At | Profit from improved triggered email creation with improved subscriber identification and list growth | A8*A9*A10*A11*A 12*A13 | $147,000 | $411,328 | $670,148 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||
| Atr | Profit from improved triggered email creation, with improved subscriber identification and list growth (risk-adjusted) | $124,950 | $349,629 | $569,626 | |
| Three-year total: $1,044,205 | Three-year present value: $830,509 | ||||
Evidence and data. While interviewees shared that campaign email contributes a smaller portion of revenue to their organizations’ overall email programs compared to triggered email, they told Forrester their companies realized campaign revenue gains through subscriber list growth. Interviewees noted the impact of increasing campaign send volume by configuring and optimizing pop-ups on their websites.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The impact of this benefit can vary among organizations based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $622,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Total email subscribers with legacy ESP (assuming 5% growth) | Composite | 1,500,000 | 1,575,000 | 1,653,750 |
| B2 | Growth in email subscribers via Attentive pop-ups on website | Interviews | 20% | 25% | 25% |
| B3 | Total email subscribers with Attentive | Year 1: B1*B2 | 1,800,000 | 2,250,000 | 2,812,500 |
| B4 | Subtotal: Net new subscribers with Attentive | B3-B1 | 300,000 | 675,000 | 1,158,750 |
| B5 | Emails per subscriber | Interviews | 156 | 156 | 156 |
| B6 | Campaign email unique open rate | Interviews | 35% | 40% | 40% |
| B7 | Campaign email click-through rate | Assumption | 0.50% | 1.00% | 1.25% |
| B8 | Campaign email conversion rate | Interviews | 2% | 5% | 8% |
| B9 | Average order value | Composite | $100 | $100 | $100 |
| B10 | Subtotal: Revenue capture from new subscribers | B4*B5*B6*B7*B8* B9 | $163,800 | $2,106,000 | $7,230,600 |
| B11 | Operating margin | Composite | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Bt | Campaign email profits from subscriber list growth | B10*B11 | $16,380 | $210,600 | $723,060 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | ||||
| Btr | Campaign email profits from subscriber list growth (risk-adjusted) | $13,923 | $179,010 | $614,601 | |
| Three-year total: $807,534 | Three-year present value: $622,358 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees said the Attentive Email platform is easy to use and that its navigation, integrations, and automation features saved their organizations time in daily tasks including subscriber list cleanup, pulling reports, and scheduling campaigns. The interviewees commented that because of the ease of use, their organizations were encouraged to explore and take advantage of all the tools and resources the platform had to offer instead of leaving features and advanced functionality unexplored.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The impact of this benefit can vary among organizations based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $90,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Email marketing managers who gain efficiencies from reporting, campaign creation and clean-up, and integration | Composite | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| C2 | Percentage of annual time saved with Attentive | Interviews | 35% | 35% | 35% |
| C3 | Fully burdened salary of an email marketing manager | Assumption | $114,750 | $114,750 | $114,750 |
| Ct | Email marketing manager efficiencies | C1*C2*C3 | $40,163 | $40,163 | $40,163 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Ctr | Email marketing manager efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $36,146 | $36,146 | $36,146 | |
| Three-year total: $108,439 | Three-year present value: $89,890 | ||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Attentive Email and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtr | Attentive fee | $0 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $360,000 | $298,422 |
| Etr | Implementation costs | $5,826 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $5,826 | $5,826 |
| Ftr | Ongoing management and training costs | $121 | $79,540 | $79,540 | $79,540 | $238,742 | $197,926 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $5,947 | $199,540 | $199,540 | $199,540 | $604,568 | $502,174 | |
Evidence and data. The interviewees explained that after an initial complimentary trial period, their organizations paid annual license fees that include access to the platform and a given number of email sends for their subscriber bases.
The senior DTC manager at the health retailer shared, “As far as we’re going, it’s a bargain — especially considering the white-glove service that we’re getting and the level of support we’re getting.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The impact of this cost can vary among organizations based on:
Results. Forrester estimates this cost to be a three-year, total PV (discounted at 10%) of $298,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Attentive fee | Attentive | $0 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | |||
| Dt | Attentive fee | D1 | $0 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | |||
| Dtr | Attentive fee (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 | ||||
| Three-year total: $360,000 | Three-year present value: $298,422 | ||||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees told Forrester their organizations’ implementations included migrating their subscriber lists and triggered journeys from their previous platforms and completing the IP warming process. While each organization met with Attentive to discuss progress and provide any necessary legacy information, the interviewees said Attentive took the lead in this critical setup process.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The impact of this cost can vary among organizations based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Implementation time (weeks) | Interviews | 4 | ||||||
| E2 | Email marketing managers involved in implementation | Composite | 1 | ||||||
| E3 | Percentage of email marketing manager time involved in implementation | Interviews | 50% | ||||||
| E4 | IP warming time (weeks) | Interviews | 2 | ||||||
| E5 | Percentage of email marketing manager time involved in IP warming | Interviews | 20% | ||||||
| E6 | Fully burdened salary of an email marketing manager | TEI standard | $114,750 | ||||||
| Et | Implementation costs | (E1*E3*E6/52)+ (E4*E5*E6/52) |
$5,296 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||||
| Etr | Implementation costs (risk-adjusted) | $5,826 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||
| Three-year total: $5,826 | Three-year present value: $5,826 | ||||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees said that because the platform is easy to use and intuitive, initial training was minimal. To optimize the platform, their organizations meet with Attentive representatives regularly to discuss email performance, future strategic direction, and best practices tailored specific to their organizations’ goals. Internal teams dedicate their resources to reviewing and approving email campaigns, building new automated triggers, analyzing data reports, and conducting general platform administration on an ongoing basis.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The impact of this cost can vary among organizations based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $198,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Email marketing managers dedicated to ongoing management of Attentive | Composite | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| F2 | Percentage of marketing manager time dedicated to ongoing management of Attentive | Interviews | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | |||
| F3 | Fully burdened salary of an email marketing manager dedicated to ongoing management of Attentive | Assumption | $0 | $114,750 | $114,750 | $114,750 | |||
| F4 | Marketing directors dedicated to ongoing management of Attentive | Composite | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| F5 | Percentage of marketing director time dedicated to ongoing management of Attentive | Interviews | 0% | 10% | 10% | 10% | |||
| F6 | Fully burdened salary of a marketing director dedicated to ongoing management of Attentive | TEI standard | $0 | $135,000 | $135,000 | $135,000 | |||
| F7 | Subtotal: Ongoing management | (F2*F3)+(F4*F5) | $0 | $70,875 | $70,875 | $70,875 | |||
| F8 | Time dedicated to Attentive training by email marketing manager (hours) | Interviews | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| F9 | Time dedicated to meeting with Attentive support by email marketing manager (hours) | Interviews | 0 | 26 | 26 | 26 | |||
| F10 | Subtotal: Training costs | (F7*(F3/2,080))+ (F8+(F3/2,080)) |
$110 | $1,434 | $1,434 | $1,434 | |||
| Ft | Ongoing management and training costs | F7+F10 | $110 | $72,309 | $72,309 | $72,309 | |||
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||||
| Ftr | Ongoing management and training costs (risk-adjusted) | $121 | $79,540 | $79,540 | $79,540 | ||||
| Three-year total: $238,742 | Three-year present value: $197,926 | ||||||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($5,947) | ($199,540) | ($199,540) | ($199,540) | ($604,568) | ($502,174) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $175,019 | $564,785 | $1,220,373 | $1,960,178 | $1,542,757 |
| Net benefits | ($5,947) | ($24,521) | $365,245 | $1,020,833 | $1,355,610 | $1,040,583 |
| ROI | 207% | |||||
| Payback | 14.0 months | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Related Forrester Research
“The Inbox Intimacy Conundrum,” Forrester Research, Inc., April 12, 2023.
“The Best And Worst Of Email Marketing, 2022,” Forrester Research, Inc., April 1, 2022.
“The Email Marketing Review, 2024,” Forrester Research, Inc. December 11, 2023.
“High Stakes Email Deliverability,” Forrester Research, Inc. January 27, 2022.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
2 Source: “Tune Up Your Email Marketing Technique,” Forrester Research, Inc., November 30, 2022.
3 Source: “It Is 2050: Your Website Is Deserted,” Forrester Research, Inc., March 15, 2023.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XX1 | Total email subscribers with Attentive | B3 | 1,800,000 | 2,250,000 | 2,812,500 |
| XX2 | Opt-out rate before using Attentive | Assumption | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| XX3 | Decrease in opt-out rate with Attentive | Interviews | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| XX4 | Opt-out rate with Attentive | XX2-(XX2*XX3) | 1.76% | 1.76% | 1.76% |
| XX5 | Subscribers reengaged with Attentive | (XX1*XX2)-(XX1*XX4) | 4,320 | 5,400 | 6,750 |
| XX6 | Campaign emails per subscriber | B5 | 156 | 156 | 156 |
| XX7 | Campaign email open rate | B6 | 35% | 40% | 40% |
| XX8 | Campaign email click-through rate | B7 | 0.50% | 1.00% | 1.25% |
| XX9 | Campaign email conversion rate | B8 | 2% | 5% | 8% |
| XX10 | Average order value | Composite | $100 | $100 | $100 |
| XX11 | Revenue recaptured from decrease in opt-out rate | XX5*XX6*XX7*XX8*XX9*XX10 | $2,359 | $16,848 | $42,120 |
| XX12 | Operating margin | Composite | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| XXt | Profits from decrease in opt-out rate | XX11*XX12 | $236 | $1,685 | $4,212 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| XXtr | Profits from decrease in opt-out rate (risk-adjusted) | $212 | $1,516 | $3,791 | |
| Three-year total: $6,134 | Three-year present value: $4,294 | ||||
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.