A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Alight, September 2024
Today, companies face a significant challenge: Despite increased investment in benefits, employee engagement is decreasing.1 Organizations are caught in a bind, seeking to reduce costs while aiming to improve the employee experience (EX) and deliver meaningful benefits.2 Employees, too, are experiencing strain.3 They face increasing complexity of benefits choices and providers as well as a fragmented benefits ecosystem that is difficult to navigate. Escalating complexity and costs have left employers and employees in need of a solution. By connecting disparate systems, eliminating friction, and delivering personalized benefits at scale, Alight Worklife® can offer organizations a strong benefits advantage and help them optimize their benefits programs. The platform can help companies enhance employee well-being in every dimension, reduce costs, and drive superior business outcomes that lead to a thriving, healthy, and financially secure workforce.
Alight aims to provide a benefits advantage through the cloud-native Alight Worklife platform, powered by purpose-built AI trained on comprehensive US benefits data and supported by a team of benefits experts. This platform integrates with Alight’s health, wealth, well-being, navigation, and absence administration solutions, as well as over 600 benefits ecosystem programs and tools. Additionally, Alight offers professional services and customer support with Benefits Experts who serve as health professionals, medical allies, licensed advisors, and more.
Alight commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Alight Worklife.4 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Alight Worklife on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed the representative of an organization who has experience using Alight Worklife. Forrester used this experience to project a three-year financial analysis.
The interviewee noted that prior to Alight, their organization manually administered its healthcare, 401(k), and pension programs internally. Furthermore, with over 30 benefits programs, the company and its employees faced significant complexity. This resulted in inefficiencies and opportunities to improve the employee experience by tying different benefit components together.
After the investment in Alight, the interviewee’s organization utilized Alight to administer its healthcare, 401(k), and pension programs. It then used Alight Worklife and other Alight solutions to tie the different components of its benefits ecosystem together, with support from Alight Benefits Experts. Key results from the investment include total rewards optimization, health-related cost savings, and productivity gains, all of which contributed to better business outcomes.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the interviewee’s organization include:
The interview and financial analysis found that the representative’s organization experiences benefits of $9.0 million over three years versus costs of $4.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $4.8 million and an ROI of 112%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Alight Worklife.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Alight Worklife can have on an organization.
Interviewed Alight stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Alight Worklife.
Interviewed the representative of an organization using Alight Worklife to obtain data with respect to costs, benefits, and risks.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interview using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewee.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Alight and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Alight Worklife.
Alight reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Alight provided the customer name for the interview but did not participate in the interview.
Consulting Team:
Andrew Nadler
Forrester interviewed the representative of an organization who has experience using Alight Worklife. Their organization has the following characteristics:
Before it was an Alight customer, the interviewee’s organization manually administered its healthcare, 401(k), and pension programs. This necessitated a significant amount of labor. The interviewee explained: “We managed health and wealth in-house, and our pension was managed in-house. Open enrollment was done internally. It was very old-school.” Additionally, the increasing number of benefits offerings (over 30) resulted in expanding benefits complexity and costs, which introduced difficulties for both the organization and its employees.
The interviewee noted how the organization struggled with common challenges, including:
To overcome these challenges and achieve the business’s objectives, the interviewee’s organization uses the following Alight solutions:
Initially, the interviewee’s organization began utilizing Alight to administer its pension, 401(k), and healthcare programs to save labor. It then expanded to use other Alight solutions, such as Healthcare Navigation with Alight Worklife, which helped increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve EX. Over time, the interviewee’s organization has continued to grow its relationship with Alight, driving business outcomes.
For this use case, Forrester has modeled benefits and costs over three years.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Total rewards optimization | $872,640 | $1,745,280 | $2,617,920 | $5,235,840 | $4,202,571 |
| Btr | Healthcare-related cost savings | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | $5,400,000 | $4,476,334 |
| Ctr | Improved benefits team productivity | $129,375 | $129,375 | $129,375 | $388,125 | $321,736 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $2,802,015 | $3,674,655 | $4,547,295 | $11,023,965 | $9,000,641 | |
Evidence and data. The interviewee’s organization used Alight Worklife to analyze and optimize its benefits programs and increase employee participation within those programs. Alight Worklife and the Alight Benefits Experts helped drive employee engagement, leading to increased utilization. The interviewee’s organization was then able to support a healthy workforce, driving financial value.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following about the company:
Risks. This benefit may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.2 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Number of programs optimized | Company | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| A2 | Number of employees | Company | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| A3 | Average increased utilization per program | Interview | 4% | 4% | 4% |
| A4 | Average program net value per user | Assumption | $404 | $404 | $404 |
| At | Total rewards optimization | A1*A2*A3*A4 | $969,600 | $1,939,200 | $2,908,800 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Atr | Total rewards optimization (risk-adjusted) | $872,640 | $1,745,280 | $2,617,920 | |
| Three-year total: $5,235,840 | Three-year present value: $4,202,571 | ||||
Evidence and data. In conjunction with driving value through increased benefits program utilization with Alight Worklife, the interviewee highlighted how their organization was able to reduce healthcare-related costs. The interviewee described how Alight Healthcare Navigation and Alight Health Pros helped resolve claim issues, find in-network doctors, schedule appointments, and more. As a result, the interviewee noted, “Alight assessed savings of $1 million to $2 million for our first year.” They explained: “The savings could be time the employee would have spent if they had to do it themselves. It could also be finding network doctors for them as opposed to going out-of-network. That’s savings to the plan. It could be avoiding high-cost medical procedures as well.” The company then reinvested this time and cost savings elsewhere to improve EX and drive growth.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
Risks. This benefit may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.5 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Healthcare-related cost savings | Interview | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 |
| Bt | Healthcare-related cost savings | B1 | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Btr | Healthcare-related cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | $1,800,000 | |
| Three-year total: $5,400,000 | Three-year present value: $4,476,334 | ||||
Evidence and data. The interviewee highlighted how their organization’s benefits team leveraged Alight Worklife and the Alight Benefits Experts to realize time savings engaging with and supporting employees. The interviewee explained: “There has been improved productivity for our benefits team. All first-tier questions go to Alight before coming to our team. Only the escalated issues come to us now.” As a result, the company’s benefits team was able to focus on higher-priority work to support and improve EX, leading to better business outcomes.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following about the company:
Risks. This benefit may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $322,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Number of benefits employees | Company | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| C2 | Increased benefits team productivity | Interview | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| C3 | Average blended fully burdened salary for a benefits employee | TEI standard | $115,000 | $115,000 | $115,000 |
| Ct | Improved benefits team productivity | C1*C2*C3 | $143,750 | $143,750 | $143,750 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Ctr | Improved benefits team productivity (risk-adjusted) | $129,375 | $129,375 | $129,375 | |
| Three-year total: $388,125 | Three-year present value: $321,736 | ||||
The interviewee mentioned the following additional benefits that the organization experienced but was not able to quantify.
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Alight Worklife and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtr | Alight costs | $0 | $1,575,000 | $1,575,000 | $1,575,000 | $4,725,000 | $3,916,792 |
| Etr | Implementation, ongoing management, and training costs | $165,000 | $66,550 | $66,550 | $66,550 | $364,650 | $330,500 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $165,000 | $1,641,550 | $1,641,550 | $1,641,550 | $5,089,650 | $4,247,292 | |
Evidence and data. The interviewee’s organization paid Alight for use of the Alight Worklife platform, solutions, and services. Additionally, the company also paid Alight for direct benefit, direct contribution, and healthcare administration.
Pricing may vary. Contact Alight for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following about the company:
Risks. This cost may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.9 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Alight costs | Company | $0 | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | |
| Dt | Alight costs | D1 | $0 | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | ||||||
| Dtr | Alight costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $1,575,000 | $1,575,000 | $1,575,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $4,725,000 | Three-year present value: $3,916,792 | ||||||
Evidence and data. In addition to the cost of Alight Worklife, the interviewee’s organization also invested sufficient labor to adopt Alight Worklife, including implementation, ongoing management, and training. This allowed the organization to realize the benefits of the investment.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following about the company:
Risks. This cost may vary based on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $331,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Percentage of effort for a benefits employee for implementation | Company | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| E2 | Percentage of effort for an IT employee for implementation | Company | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| E3 | Fully burdened salary for a benefits employee | TEI standard | $115,000 | $115,000 | $115,000 | $115,000 |
| E4 | Fully burdened salary for an IT employee | TEI standard | $145,000 | $145,000 | $145,000 | $145,000 |
| E5 | Subtotal: Implementation costs | (E1*E2)+(E3*E4) | $127,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| E6 | Percentage of effort for a benefits employee for ongoing management and training | Company | 20% | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| E7 | Percentage of effort for an IT employee for ongoing management and training | Company | 0% | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| E8 | Subtotal: Ongoing management and training costs | (E6*E3)+(E7*E4) | $23,000 | $60,500 | $60,500 | $60,500 |
| Et | Implementation, ongoing management, and training costs | E5+E8 | $150,000 | $60,500 | $60,500 | $60,500 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Etr | Implementation, ongoing management, and training costs (risk-adjusted) | $165,000 | $66,550 | $66,550 | $66,550 | |
| Three-year total: $364,650 | Three-year present value: $330,500 | |||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($165,000) | ($1,641,550) | ($1,641,550) | ($1,641,550) | ($5,089,650) | ($4,247,292) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $2,802,015 | $3,674,655 | $4,547,295 | $11,023,965 | $9,000,641 |
| Net benefits | ($165,000) | $1,160,465 | $2,033,105 | $2,905,745 | $5,934,315 | $4,753,349 |
| ROI | 112% | |||||
| Payback period (months) | <12 months | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Related Forrester Research
Lessons Learned On Employee Excellence And Actualization, Forrester Research, Inc., December 27, 2023.
Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion Video Case Study: Forrester Research, Forrester Research, Inc., September 19, 2023.
Real Diversity Activated: Seeing Challenges As Strengths, Forrester Research, Inc., July 19, 2023.
The People Leader’s Guide To Burnout, Forrester Research, Inc., January 11, 2022.
The ROI Of EX, Forrester Research, Inc., September 3, 2019.
1 Source: Tracking Changes in Benefit Costs, U.S. Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Spring 1999; Employer Costs For Employee Compensation, U.S. Bureau Of Labor Statistics, June 18, 2024; Predictions 2024: The Future Of Work, Forrester Research, Inc., October 26, 2023.
2 Source: US Technology Executives: The Priorities That Matter, 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., June 24, 2024.
3 Source: Take Employee Wellness Beyond Benefits, Forrester Research, Inc., June 18, 2021.
4 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
5 Source: Take Employee Wellness Beyond Benefits, Forrester Research, Inc., June 18, 2021; The Customer-Obsessed Leader, 2023, Forrester Research, Inc., June 12, 2023.
6 Source: Take Employee Wellness Beyond Benefits, Forrester Research, Inc., June 18, 2021.
7 Source: Combine Well-Being, Belonging, And Cultural Alignment To Amplify EX, Forrester Research, Inc., September 18, 2023.
8 Source: Understand The Differences Between EX And CX, Forrester Research, Inc., August 2, 2021.
9 Source: How Customer Experience Drives Business Growth, 2023, Forrester Research, Inc., October 13, 2023.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html