Executive Summary
Modern organizations seek fast, secure ways to turn data into insight, and many are increasingly turning to cloud data pipelines to ingest, transform, and move data more consistently and in real time. These platforms can support engineers and business analysts by providing automated, self-service capabilities that simplify workflows and enable faster decision-making.
Airbyte is an open-source data movement platform that provides data teams with an extensible and reliable way to move data at scale. It offers flexible connector-based architecture, supports incremental data syncs, and is hosted via Airbyte Cloud.
Airbyte commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Airbyte.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Airbyte on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers across four organizations with experience using Airbyte. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a $2 billion organization with 5,000 employees. For the purposes of this study, the composite invests in Airbyte Pro, Airbyte’s enterprise-tier cloud offering.
Prior to the investment in Airbyte, the interviewees’ organizations implemented a combination of custom-built workflows and legacy tools for data movement and ingestion across structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data. These environments demanded extensive engineering resources — particularly for data pipeline and platform maintenance — while using disparate tools and workflows led to siloed, nonstandardized processes for engineers. Ultimately, these organizations struggled with poor data fidelity and the ability to become data-driven businesses.
With the investment in Airbyte, the interviewees organizations’ realized improvements in data reliability and quality. Engineering resources gained productivity in their pipeline development and maintenance workflows, and overall data platform infrastructure management decreased. Interviewees reported that faster and more reliable decision-making contributed to incremental profit growth.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
-
Increased data engineer productivity. With Airbyte, the composite’s data engineers gain access to an extensive connector library and standardize their pipeline development and maintenance workflows. This leads to a 60% productivity lift when building pipelines and a 40% productivity lift when maintaining pipelines. Over three years, this is worth $723,000 in labor savings.
-
Reduction in infrastructure management labor. As the composite transitions from a self-hosted environment to Airbyte, the internal labor required to maintain the underlying data platform infrastructure decreases. The composite repurposes the work of one infrastructure engineer. Over three years, this is worth $371,000 in labor savings.
-
Incremental profit growth. With Airbyte, the composite gains access to faster, more accurate, and reliable data which drives net new insights for the business. As a result, the composite implements new revenue-driving activities, increasing overall profit margin. Over three years, this is worth $462,000 in profit growth.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Data reliability improvement. The composite’s data is refreshed and available more consistently with Airbyte. This reliability improvement allows the organization’s data teams to increase the speed at which they run daily jobs.
-
Data quality improvement. With access to improved data troubleshooting and maintenance, the composite increases its overall data visibility. In turn, this improves the organization’s data quality and overall usability.
-
Simplified compliance and regulatory reporting. Having cleaner, more accurate data eases the administrative burden on critical reporting tasks for the composite’s compliance and regulatory requirements.
-
Increased business user adoption. Airbyte’s accessible user interface allows the composite’s business users to self-serve rather relying on engineers to query data.
-
Faster, more informed decision-making. As data ingestion and management is standardized across the composite and data reliability and quality improves, the overall time to insight decreases.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
-
Airbyte fees. The composite pays an annual fee for Airbyte Pro based on the number of data workers required. It pays for $137,500 for five workers in Year 1, $156,200 for six workers in Year 2, and $174,900 for seven in Year 3. Over three years, this costs the composite $385,000.
-
Implementation, training, and ongoing management. The composite dedicates 240 hours to initial platform configuration and 120 hours to engineer training for Airbyte users. On an ongoing basis, it dedicates 100 hours a year to user administration, platform maintenance, and optimization. Applying an average fully burdened rate of $97 and a 15% risk adjustment, this results in three-year costs of $73,000.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $1.6 million over three years versus costs of $459,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $1.1 million and an ROI of 239%.
Key Statistics
239%
Return on investment (ROI)
$1.6M
Benefits PV
$1.1M
Net present value (NPV)
<6 months
Payback
Benefits (Three-Year)
The Airbyte Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the Airbyte investment
Interviews
| Role | Industry | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senior manager of data platform engineering | Entertainment | $1.9B | 2,000 |
| Senior software engineer | Real estate | $2.6B | 6,500 |
|
Staff engineer Data engineer |
Marketing | $273M | 1,000 |
| Head of tech and security | Healthcare | $500M to $1B | 10,000 |
Key Challenges
Prior to investment in Airbyte, the interviewees’ organizations used a combination of legacy data tools and custom-built workflows for data movement and ingestion. Data teams lacked a standardized process to develop pipelines efficiently at scale and were burdened with infrastructure maintenance. Ultimately, this hindered the organizations from analyzing the data for insights to solve critical business problems. Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
-
Significant overhead required to build and maintain pipelines. Interviewees explained that their organizations’ legacy workflows demanded extensive data engineering and infrastructure effort to support basic business data needs. The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said: “You can imagine the engineering overhead involved in setting up pipelines and writing on our [old data-processing application]. It’s developer-intensive. You need subject matter experts to do that.”
The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization said: “My data engineering team only consists of three engineers to support the entire organization for their data needs and data ingestion. With our prior solution, it became cumbersome to wait for support when something broke.”
The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said: “ETL (extract, transform, load) has been quite a manual process, [involving] grabbing the file and putting it into a temporary database. There’s no one standard type of data that we ingest.”
-
Disparate data tools and workflows. Interviewees explained that development workflows across engineers were often siloed and not standardized. The staff engineer at a marketing organization said: “The team built their own homegrown solutions on the cloud to then connect to data sources and our data lake. Every source had a different workflow [and] a slightly different tech stack, and it was tricky to maintain and update those pipelines.”
-
Poor data fidelity. The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization that previously used a legacy tool explained that relying on a nonresponsive partner to troubleshoot issues led to data accuracy and reliability concerns: “Our prior solution was a very big black box where, if something broke, you would have to hit a support channel and wait. We had issues with data fidelity.”
-
Inability to become data-driven organization. Ultimately, the interviewees stressed that overburdened engineers, inconsistent processes, and untrustworthy data prevented their organizations from effectively using data to drive decision-making. The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said: “We were stuck in a legacy process. We wanted to actually get past this stage and become a data-driven organization with data replication.”
Investment Objectives
Forrester research indicates organizations want simple, integrated, cost-effective, and highly automated solutions to support modern business insights.2 As such, the interviewees searched for a solution that could:
-
Enable use for business teams.
-
Provide improved visibility into the data.
-
Offer an extensive connector library.
-
Meet security and compliance needs.
After a request for proposal (RFP) and business case process evaluating multiple vendors, the interviewees’ organizations chose Airbyte and began deployment. Interviewees mentioned the following reasons as to why they specifically selected Airbyte.
-
Open-source proof of concept. The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization said, “It was very compelling to start with the open-source offering and actually play around with the tool for free to understand if it could solve the problems we ran into with other solutions.”
-
Accessible user interface. Forrester research states: “Traditionally, CDPs were used by technical users such as developers, data engineers, and data scientists. However, with advances in automation, many solutions offer point-and-click UI so even nontechnical users, such as business analysts, data analysts, and businesses, can build pipelines.”3 The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said, “We wanted to give the business the flexibility to use data instead of relying heavily on engineering.”
-
Role-based controls. The staff engineer at a marketing organization said, “We knew with the Airbyte Pro version, we could better integrate with our identity provider to give multiple workspaces with multiple teams granular access to their pipelines.”
-
Support for security and compliance needs. The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said: “We wanted to scale adoption to teams that have strict compliance requirements. The motivating factor was to drive adoption to more use cases, personas, and teams.”
The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization said: “On the security front, I like that it has SSO (single sign-on) and integration with all our enterprise systems. I also like how their approach to connectors works with relation to security.”
-
Cost effectiveness. Interviewees said Airbyte uses capacity-based pricing that scales based on infrastructure needs rather than the amount of data moved, which they explained allows for predictable and scalable pricing. The price is based on the number of Airbyte connections needed and the frequency at which data is refreshed. The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said: “The cost factors involved with Airbyte were much cheaper than the other solution we were evaluating. … [For example], one of our teams that was using the other solution for a single use case exceeded our entire Airbyte contract.”
-
Gaining the ability to implement custom connectors. Interviewees said Airbyte’s Connector Builder is a no-code tool that provides an intuitive user interface to develop a source connector without needing to leave Airbyte and that the connectors are configured with built-in validation and guidance. The senior software engineer said, “A significant factor [in my organization’s investment decision] was [Airbyte’s] ability to implement custom source connectors in a low-code manner.”
Composite Organization
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
-
Description of composite. The composite organization generates $2 billion in annual revenue and has 5,000 employees.
-
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization uses the Airbyte Pro plan and deploys on Airbyte’s Cloud. Fifty employees (40 developers and 10 business analysts) use the platform. The composite requires five data workers in Year 1, six in Year 2, and seven in Year 3.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
-
$2 billion in revenue
-
5,000 employees
-
50 Airbyte users
-
Five data workers in Year 1
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Increased data engineer productivity | $197,880 | $296,820 | $395,760 | $890,460 | $722,537 |
| Btr | Reduction in infrastructure management labor | $149,175 | $149,175 | $149,175 | $447,525 | $370,976 |
| Ctr | Incremental profit growth | $96,000 | $192,000 | $288,000 | $576,000 | $462,329 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $443,055 | $637,995 | $832,935 | $1,913,985 | $1,555,842 |
Increased Data Engineer Productivity
Evidence and data. Forrester research states: “It’s no longer enough to build the best pipeline; data engineers need to excel at effective communication and collaboration with business partners to master the ever-changing business insight landscape.”4 Interviewees said that while data engineers are the primary users of Airbyte, they work closely with business analysts to understand and map data outcomes. They explained that engineer effort to build, maintain, and troubleshoot data pipelines decreased due to Airbyte’s connector library, accessible UI, and data reliability.
-
The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said: “Now there is a standard way to [set up connectors], which helps to accelerate tasks. In order of magnitude [for setting up connectors before and after Airbyte] … it is days versus hours. It really depends on the maturity of tooling the individual teams were using before.”
-
The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization shared a few different examples of productivity:
- Troubleshooting. “Instead of troubleshooting issues with our old solution, the data engineers can spend their time ensuring we have healthy pipelines and data stewardship. Troubleshooting and fixing is probably the biggest return on investment for my team. Being able to quickly diagnose saves tens of hours a month.”
- Building. “Being able to have both custom connectors and very reliable off-the-shelf connectors allowed us to get a lot faster. Airbyte’s no-code solution has also been very helpful for my team on getting started with very generic APIs and being able to integrate those fast. I estimate it saves tens of hours a month. … Before Airbyte, we were building a handful of pipelines. Now, about 40% of our connectors are [things we developed and custom-built] over two years.”
- Data requests. “It is probably 10 hours a month overall [in] time savings when fulfilling data requests for the procurement and fulfillment teams.”
-
The data engineer at a marketing organization said:
- Maintenance. “It used to take five-FTE team to manage these pipelines earlier when it was built using homegrown technology. Now one person spends 10% of time to maintain these pipelines. That’s a direct reduction in manpower.”
- Development. “It took us a month to build, test, and deploy custom code for an ads ingestion pipeline. Getting the same exact output [for the same solution] took two days in Airbyte. That is a 10 times decrease in development.”
-
The head of tech and security at a marketing organization said:
- Development. “Without Airbyte, it takes 30% to 40% more time to build a data pipeline. We have existing code [within Airbyte] that can be used to handle the pain of software development that added time in the old process.”
- Troubleshooting. “By having the business sit in the call as early as possible and tell what they want to do … it saves back-and-forth time for engineering to get ahead of potential glitches.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
-
The composite organization builds 100 new pipelines per year.
-
Prior to Airbyte, it took 40 hours to build a pipeline.
-
With Airbyte the time to build a pipeline is reduced by 60%.
-
Prior to Airbyte, it took 60 hours to manage and maintain a pipeline.
-
With Airbyte the time is reduced by 40%.
-
Fifty percent of the recaptured time is spent on productive activities.
-
The average fully burdened hourly salary for a data engineer is $97.
Risks. This benefit may vary among organizations depending on:
-
The number and complexity of pipelines built.
-
Existing processes in place to manage and maintain pipelines.
-
The average salary for a data engineer.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $723,000.
60%
Time saved building pipelines
40%
Time saved managing and maintaining pipelines
Increased Data Engineer Productivity
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | New pipelines | Composite | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| A2 | Subtotal: Total pipelines | A1+A2PY | 100 | 200 | 300 | |
| A3 | Time to build a pipeline in the prior environment (hours) | Composite | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| A4 | Time to manage and maintain a pipeline in the prior environment (hours) | Composite | 60 | 60 | 60 | |
| A5 | Percentage of time saved building pipelines with Airbyte | Interviews | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| A6 | Percentage of time saved managing and maintaining pipelines with Airbyte | Interviews | 40% | 40% | 40% | |
| A7 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| A8 | Average fully burdened hourly salary for a data engineer salary | Composite | $97 | $97 | $97 | |
| At | Increased data engineer productivity | ((A1*A3*A5)+(A2*A4*A6))*A7*A8 | $232,800 | $349,200 | $465,600 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Atr | Increased data engineer productivity (risk-adjusted) | $197,880 | $296,820 | $395,760 | ||
| Three-year total: $890,460 | Three-year present value: $722,537 | |||||
Reduction In Infrastructure Management Labor
Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that in addition to data engineers, platform infrastructure teams also gained productivity. The effort previously required to maintain underlying compute and networking components, as well as team access, decreased after the transition to Airbyte’s managed solution.
-
The staff engineer at a marketing organization said: “The infrastructure team has seen a reduction in effort. It’s now much easier to onboard teams and to troubleshoot because there is one platform and one paradigm. It is much easier for us cognitively, whereas before we had all those custom repositories with custom tooling and different tech stacks, some of which were not maintained properly. It is now much easier for us to support the average user.”
-
The same interviewee said: “I can only imagine that if we didn’t have Airbyte, our team would not be able to do anything else in the data platform. We would be blocked by maintenance. Right now, the team spends 10% of their time on these tasks with Airbyte.”
-
The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said: “There’s always a big benefit in having a managed system. Management includes the infrastructure behind the scenes. Storage, compute and network [components] are always painful to maintain.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
-
The work of one infrastructure engineer is repurposed in transitioning to Airbyte.
-
The average annual fully burdened salary for an infrastructure engineer is $175,000.
Risks. This benefit may vary among organizations depending on the number of resources dedicated to data platform infrastructure management in the prior environment.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $371,000.
Reduction In Infrastructure Management Labor
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Repurposed resources dedicated to infrastructure management in the prior environment | Interviews | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| B2 | Average fully burdened annual salary for an infrastructure engineer | Composite | $175,500 | $175,500 | $175,500 | |
| Bt | Reduction in infrastructure management labor | B1*B2 | $175,500 | $175,500 | $175,500 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Btr | Reduction in infrastructure management labor (risk-adjusted) | $149,175 | $149,175 | $149,175 | ||
| Three-year total: $447,525 | Three-year present value: $370,976 | |||||
Incremental Profit Growth
Evidence and data. Forrester research states: “CDP solutions create new business opportunities to quickly ingest and process new data sets through automation with low-code and no-code capabilities.”5 It also notes that CDPs operate on elastic cloud infrastructure that enables organizations to simulate new patterns and insights.
The interviewees shared examples of how improving data accuracy and availability led to revenue and profit impacts for their organizations.
-
The staff engineer at a marketing organization said: “The accuracy has significantly increased for a large portion of our pipelines. Before, we would have at least three different questions about why data is not matching with five different sources, and every day there would be a failure. …Ultimately, our shareholders were burdened with incorrect data, [which was passed] to our marketing teams, who would be incorrectly bidding on traffic, therefore decreasing the bottom line on our profit margins. We drastically improved shareholder value implementing this solution.”
-
The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said: “The organization is able to process more data. We are able to capture revenue faster as it allows the organization to fill customer contracts faster. We have around 150 customers per year, and we are able to get 20% more customers each year.”
-
The senior manager of data platform engineering at an engineering organization said, “Because Airbyte helps to move data around our systems, we have better insight into what our customers are interacting with across the organization.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
-
The composite generates $2 billion in annual revenue.
-
It has a 12% operating margin.
-
Airbyte is attributed a 0.05% revenue increase in Year 1, a 0.10% increase in Year 2, and a 0.15% increase in Year 3.
Risks. This benefit may vary among organizations depending on:
-
Annual revenue.
-
Operating margins.
-
The extent to which the organization uses data to drive revenue impacting objectives.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $462,000.
Incremental Profit Growth
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Revenue | Composite | $2,000,000,000 | $2,000,000,000 | $2,000,000,000 | |
| C2 | Increase in revenue attributable to Airbyte | Composite | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.15% | |
| C3 | Operating margin | Composite | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| Ct | Incremental profit growth | C1*C2*C3 | $120,000 | $240,000 | $360,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Ctr | Incremental profit growth (risk-adjusted) | $96,000 | $192,000 | $288,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $576,000 | Three-year present value: $462,329 | |||||
Unquantified Benefits
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
-
Data reliability improvement. Interviewees explained that the consistency at which data is refreshed and available for use by their organizations greatly improved. The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said: “We have teams that are able to run jobs a lot more frequently and have more up-to-date data. Instead of running daily jobs, we have teams running them every 10 minutes.”
The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization said: “One of our major data sources is related to our e-commerce sales. Before, that pipeline could take sometimes a day or two [to load] after a massive new sale would happen. The e-commerce team wants to see the results of sales from these transactions so they can start developing their next content drop. By virtue of it sometimes taking 48 hours to get fully in sync, we had to figure out a better solution, and now Airbyte can basically live sync data in almost near real time.”
-
Data quality improvement. Interviewees expressed that having access to improved data troubleshooting and maintenance led to an increase in data quality and accuracy. The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization said: “Being able to have near real time and live troubleshooting for datasets has allowed us to have a lot of high confidence in the quality of our data.”
-
Simplified compliance and regulatory reporting. Interviewees explained that clean, available data eases the burden on tasks such as compliance and regulatory reporting. The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said, “We are able to simplify our internal security compliance reporting by using Airbyte because it is now standardized.” The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said, “It helps the organization meet regulatory deadlines faster.”
-
Increased business user adoption. Interviewees said Airbyte’s user interface is approachable and that nontechnical data teams can understand it to promote self-service. The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said: “It lowers the barrier to entry for certain teams to integrate data in an otherwise complex data environment. The user-facing documentation can help someone [go] from zero to having a table they can query in the destination.”
-
Faster, more informed decision-making. Interviewees said using Airbyte led to a systematic shift in the speed with which their organizations could provide insights to business users. The staff engineer at a marketing organization said: “We have drastically reduced the time to insight for the business. Earlier, the lag for some of the sources was T-2 (two days prior) or T-3 (three days prior), and now it is uniformly T-1 (one day prior).”
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Airbyte and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
-
Use case expansion, including AI. Interviewees anticipate continuing Airbyte use across teams and exploring how AI and agentic use cases can drive additional business outcomes. The staff engineer at a marketing organization said: “One consideration that we’re making is to open up to more teams. We have some requests for streaming.”
The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization said, “We’re starting to get our toes wet [with] AI, and Airbyte makes sure that any AI capabilities that we’re looking at internally have a lot of high quality, highly reliable data flowing into our data warehouse for use.”
The data engineer at a marketing organization said: “There could be use cases where we can provide marketing information to an agent that can provide information to finance and help them make decisions. These use cases have not been formulated yet.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtr | Airbyte fees | $0 | $137,500 | $156,200 | $174,900 | $468,600 | $385,496 |
| Etr | Implementation, training, and ongoing management costs | $40,158 | $13,386 | $13,386 | $13,386 | $80,316 | $73,447 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $40,158 | $150,886 | $169,586 | $188,286 | $548,916 | $458,943 |
Airbyte Fees
Evidence and data. Interviewees explained that their organizations pay annual fees for Airbyte Pro based on the number of required data workers. Pricing may vary. Contact Airbyte for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
-
The composite uses Airbyte Pro.
-
The composite requires five data workers in Year 1, six in Year 2, and seven in Year 3.
Risks. This cost may vary among organizations depending on the number of data workers.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $386,000.
Airbyte Fees
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Annual Airbyte Pro fees | Airbyte | $0 | $125,000 | $142,000 | $159,000 |
| Dt | Airbyte fees | D1 | $0 | $125,000 | $142,000 | $159,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Dtr | Airbyte fees (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $137,500 | $156,200 | $174,900 | |
| Three-year total: $468,600 | Three-year present value: $385,496 | |||||
Implementation, Training, And Ongoing Management Costs
Evidence and data. Many interviewees said their organization implemented Airbyte in an open-source deployment prior to full investment. Implementation time varied depending on the organization’s prior environment, whether homegrown or involving a transition from another data tool. Implementation involved engineering and business teams setting up connectors, configuring user access, and mapping intended data outcomes. On an ongoing basis, the organizations dedicate effort to platform maintenance (e.g., patching, meeting with Airbyte to discuss new solution features).
-
The senior software engineer at a real estate organization said: “Our initial upgrade and migration took two months. On an ongoing basis, I spend two weeks out of every three months on ongoing maintenance.”
-
The senior manager of data platform engineering at an entertainment organization said: “We first used [Airbyte’s] open-source version, which we were able to have running within two weeks. This included building the first connectors to ensure it works with our integrations. On an ongoing basis, it takes 5% to 10% of the team’s time to keep the platform up and running.”
-
The data engineer at a marketing organization said, “Transitioning from our homegrown environment to Airbyte took about eight weeks.”
-
The staff engineer at a marketing organization said, “At most, it is 1 to 2 hours per week to maintain the platform.”
-
The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said: “Implementing Airbyte itself took about three months. This included both the business side mapping out the data and the data side setting up the connectors and piping the data.”
-
The head of tech and security at a healthcare organization said: “The [Airbyte] team interacts [with us] at least quarterly. Airbyte continues to roll out new software packages and new features.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:
-
The composite uses Airbyte Pro.
-
The composite dedicates 240 hours to initial implementation.
-
On an ongoing basis, it dedicates 100 hours to solution administration.
-
The average fully burdened hourly salary for a data engineer is $97.
Risks. This cost may vary among organizations depending on:
-
The organization’s prior data environment.
-
Tools and processes in place.
-
The complexity of the data environment.
-
Use cases in Airbyte.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $73,000.
Implementation, Training, And Ongoing Management Costs
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Time dedicated to implementation (hours) | Interviews | 240 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| E2 | Time dedicated to ongoing management (hours) | Interviews | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| E3 | Time dedicated to training (hours) | Interviews | 120 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| E4 | Average fully burdened hourly salary for a data engineer salary | Composite | $97 | $97 | $97 | $97 |
| Et | Implementation, training, and ongoing management costs | (E1+E2+E3)*E4 | $34,920 | $11,640 | $11,640 | $11,640 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑15% | |||||
| Etr | Implementation, training, and ongoing management costs (risk-adjusted) | $40,158 | $13,386 | $13,386 | $13,386 | |
| Three-year total: $80,316 | Three-year present value: $73,447 | |||||
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($40,158) | ($150,886) | ($169,586) | ($188,286) | ($548,916) | ($458,943) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $443,055 | $637,995 | $832,935 | $1,913,985 | $1,555,842 |
| Net benefits | ($40,158) | $292,169 | $468,409 | $644,649 | $1,365,069 | $1,096,899 |
| ROI | 239% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Airbyte.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Airbyte can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Airbyte stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Airbyte.
Interviews
Interviewed five decision-makers at four organizations using Airbyte to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Composite Organization
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Supplemental Material
Related Forrester Research
The Future Of Data Platforms, Forrester Research, Inc., October 10, 2025.
Key Capabilities Of A Modern Data And AI Platform, Forrester Research, Inc., Nov 4, 2025.
Appendix C
Endnotes
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
2 Source: The Data Management For Analytics Platforms Landscape, Q4 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., Nov 20, 2024.
3 Source: The Forrester Wave: Cloud Data Pipelines, Q4 2023, Forrester Research, Inc., Nov 28, 2023.
4 Source: Role Profile: Data Engineer, Forrester Research, Inc., Sep 12, 2025, Sep 12, 2025.
5 Source: The Cloud Data Pipelines Landscape, Q3 2023, Forrester Research, Inc., July 24, 2023.
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Airbyte and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Airbyte.
Airbyte reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Airbyte provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Sarah Lervold
Maria Kulikova
Published
May 2026