Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By HCM Managed Services
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY ADP, February 2026
|
Total Economic Impact The Total Economic Impact™ Of ADP HCM Managed ServicesA FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY ADP, February 2026 Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By HCM Managed Services
Executive SummaryOrganizations are increasingly leveraging human capital management (HCM) managed services to simplify workforce complexity, accelerate digital transformation, and improve financial alignment. As talent models expand beyond traditional employees to include contingent and gig workers, managed services deliver integrated service teams that act as extensions of clients’ HCM teams. These service teams handle daily tasks and offer strategic insights to boost efficiency, reduce administrative burden, and align the workforce with business goals. These solutions also bridge gaps in HR and financial data, reduce implementation risk for modern HCM platforms, and create personalized, consumer-grade employee experiences. The result is more agile, data-driven HR functions that support strategic business outcomes. ADP HCM Managed Services is designed for midsize to large organizations, offering end-to-end administration of payroll and related HCM activities. At the heart of the solution is dedicated access to talent with deep industry and practice expertise in world-class payroll administration. Specific to this study, Forrester looked at ADP Managed Payroll Services and its effects on adjacent HCM functions. ADP commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying HCM Managed Services.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of HCM Managed Services on their organizations. To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using HCM Managed Services. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a diversified organization with 5,000 employees and $600 million annual revenue. Interviewees said that prior to using HCM Managed Services, their organizations employed multiple discrete software solutions, manual processes, and/or other managed services providers to handle their payroll work. As a result, they struggled to produce accurate payrolls, stay compliant with regulations, build effective contingency plans, and avoid overburdening their operational supervisors with payroll-related administrative tasks. After the investment in HCM Managed Services, the interviewees described smoother, more professional, and more reliable HR-related functions. Key results from the investment include reduced compliance risk, more accurate payroll, and improved employee and manager experiences as a result of live support and self-serve mobile benefits and timekeeping. Organizations also saw improved productivity, with more time for managerial and strategic activities among frontline supervisors and HCM team members. Key FindingsQuantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The financial analysis based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $16.7 million over three years versus costs of $4.7 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $11.9 million and an ROI of 251%. Key Statistics251%Return on investment (ROI) $16.7MBenefits PV $11.9MNet present value (NPV) <6 monthsPayback Benefits (Three-Year)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
The ADP HCM Managed Services Customer JourneyDrivers leading to the HCM Managed Services investmentInterviews
Key ChallengesBefore adopting ADP HCM Managed Services, interviewees relied on a mix of internal teams and traditional systems to manage payroll and HR processes. Most of their organizations used in-house payroll staff supported by legacy HCM platforms or prior managed services vendors, often supplemented with manual processes for timekeeping, compliance tracking, and benefits administration. Several companies operated on older, fragmented systems that required separate tools for payroll, human resources information systems, and reporting, while others used regional or niche vendors for specific functions like tax filing or leave management. In some cases, HR duties were shared with finance staff in the field, and onboarding or recruiting processes were handled locally rather than through centralized platforms. Overall, their “before” states were characterized by internally managed, labor-intensive processes with limited automation and reliance on multiple disconnected solutions. Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Composite OrganizationBased on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis Of BenefitsQuantified benefit data as applied to the compositeTotal Benefits
Reduced Cost Of Payroll ErrorsEvidence and data. Interviewees consistently highlighted that ADP HCM Managed Services significantly improved their payroll accuracy, reducing errors and associated costs. The senior manager of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company contrasted the current state with prior chaos: “We had no confidence in our payroll and in whether or not we were paying people correctly. We used to call it the Wild West of payroll.” After moving to ADP, they reported that errors became “very minimal” and accuracy was “very good for years,” eliminating the need for emergency fixes and restoring employee trust. This improvement also resolved long-standing reconciliation issues: “We could never reconcile our general ledger in all those years with the prior vendor. That became a nonissue when we moved to ADP Managed Services.” The financial benefits of accuracy were clear. The same senior manager of HR systems and operations in manufacturing explained that their previous managed services vendor made payroll errors that drove tax filing mistakes and penalties: “We definitely had a higher volume of [tax errors]. Knowing what we’re capable of today and how little issues we have, there were definitely errors on our previous vendor’s side.” By reducing corrections, the company avoided amended returns and compliance risks. Similarly, the director of HR at the publishing company noted that ADP’s rigorous checks cut payroll corrections, thus reducing fees for issuing manual checks: “Manual checks used to be outrageous. Now, we might go two to three months and only have one or two manual checks or errors.” This improvement not only saved money but also streamlined payroll cycles, allowing staff to finish processing earlier and avoid overtime. At the retail organization, the payroll manager reported, “We’re saving a lot of money on penalty pay.” Improved accuracy also delivered operational benefits. At the publishing company, payroll deadlines became predictable thanks to ADP’s Managed Services guardrails. The payroll manager at a retail organization recalled that ADP’s proactive data checks prevented missed paychecks for new hires and seasonal staff, boosting morale and reducing escalations. They also described how ADP handled commission errors quickly, “If I get them on the phone at 9:30, by 11:00 they have already stopped payment and they’re giving me a preview.” These rapid corrections prevented reputational damage and ensured employees received accurate pay on time. In short, improved payroll accuracy through ADP HCM Managed Services reduced compliance penalties, eliminated costly manual corrections, and enhanced employee confidence. The interviewees confirmed that the shift from systemic errors to stability meant payroll was no longer a source of disruption and, for some, was even a source of improved employee satisfaction and retention. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different financial impact in this benefit area depends on several factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $9.1 million. 95%Reduction in payroll errors Reduced Cost Of Payroll Errors
Reduced Manager Time Devoted To HR AdministrationEvidence and data. Across all interviews, a major benefit of ADP HCM Managed Services was reducing the time frontline supervisors and field managers spent on payroll and HR-related tasks, allowing them to focus on core operational responsibilities. Interviewees explained that one of their goals was to give time back to their people, particularly supervisors in manufacturing plants, field locations, and retail floors. Before automation and ADP HCM Managed Services team expertise, these supervisors would spend from 5 to 10 hours a week managing complex timekeeping and payroll issues, HRIS tasks, hiring and onboarding, and benefits administration. Now, they average less than 1 hour a week, a dramatic reduction that keeps them on the floor, engaged with employees and/or customers, rather than behind a desk. The senior manager of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company explained: “We’re a manufacturing company, and we have very complex payroll and timekeeping, just because of the manufacturing and the unions. If we didn’t have ADP HCM Managed Services, our supervisors would be spending a lot of time trying to manage that.” Interviewees highlighted how ADP’s mobile app eliminated the need for field employees and their supervisors to drive to a central location to do their time sheets or share a single computer at job sites. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility recalled: “The mobile app really gave us a lot of that operational efficiency and probably more correct data. We no longer have people driving in to the operations center to do their weekly HR tasks. Their other option was to, one at a time, get on the supervisor’s computer to do their timesheets. So somebody would be off the job doing stuff on the computer and then they’d switch in and out, or the supervisor would end up doing a lot of it. This is a much better solution.” With the ADP mobile app, supervisors approve time remotely, saving hours each pay period and improving accuracy. Interviewees noted that this flexibility was critical for crews working in remote areas, where interruptions were costly and inefficient. Customers also described how lean field teams benefited from ADP’s employee and manager support center and knowledge base. Instead of answering benefits or payroll questions themselves, supervisors direct employees to call centers, freeing time to work on finance or operational duties. The director of HR at a publishing company explained: “If [frontline employees] have benefits questions, we tell field staff to give them the number to the call center. Or if they just have general questions about policies and procedures, we have all of that information on the knowledge base. The call center will walk through the details that are on the knowledge base, and they’ll help employees that way.” This shift was especially valuable because all interviewees’ organizations were working to run with lean teams, meaning any time saved from administrative tasks directly impacted productivity. Finally, the payroll manager at a retail organization reported that managers no longer faced complaints about missed paychecks, thanks to ADP’s proactive data checks and rapid issue resolution. As she put it, “No one’s coming, complaining to them that they didn’t get paid,” which boosted morale and reduced the time supervisors spent troubleshooting payroll problems. In short, ADP HCM Managed Services streamlined processes that once consumed hours of supervisors’ and field managers’ time — whether through mobile tools, centralized support, or error prevention — allowing these leaders to stay focused on operations rather than administrative burdens. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of benefit in this area is related to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.9 million. 4 hours/weekTime saved per supervisor on payroll-related tasks Reduced Manager Time Devoted To HR Administration
Increased Payroll Team Productivity And OptimizationEvidence and data. Interviewees emphasized that ADP HCM Managed Services dramatically reduced the administrative workload for HR and payroll teams, enabling leaner staffing and freeing time for strategic work. The payroll manager in a retail organization described the shift from constant pressure to confidence: “Friday was a no-no. You couldn’t take off on a Friday as a payroll administrator. Fast forward, three years after implementation, my team can actually take off on Fridays. … It’s quiet.” They explained that this improvement stemmed from ADP handling data validation, payroll previews, and compliance checks, which previously consumed entire days. They added that the team no longer spent hours on manual data entry or emergency corrections, noting: “I’m not spending hours keying in information. … ADP does it for us. Our pay dates are kind of a breeze.” Interviewees provided specific use cases highlighting some of the time savings. The publishing company reduced audit preparation from “maybe 100 hours” to “under 36 hours” because “ADP can pull everything in an instant” for compliance reviews and 401(k) audits. The publishing company also saw annual payroll corrections fall by “80% to 90%,” saving hours of troubleshooting each cycle. The director of HR at the publishing company explained how ADP HCM Managed Services transformed the roles of many of the team’s managers in the field. They said, “We share HR duties with finance staff in the field, and what I’ve noticed is that [those employees] now have more time to do their finance duties because they can get their HR work done much more quickly in a designated time period.” The director of HR in the publishing vertical also called out notable changes in workload on her team: “Some days our benefits manager wouldn’t even get anything done because she was on the phone all day answering questions, but now she doesn’t get behind because she partners with ADP.” She continued: “Our new payroll manager is actually able to go home at a decent time because payroll gets processed a day early. ADP allows her to focus more on processing information, pulling the reports, and supporting and servicing our internal people.” At the manufacturing company, the senior manager of HR systems and operations summed it up, saying: “We are more project focused and can do more with less because my team’s not tied up in the transactional items. They have time to focus on other priorities or other projects that better the organization.” At the public utility company, the director of financial reporting and assurance relayed how ADP’s tools and partnership helped her team work faster and avoid bottlenecks. These efficiencies not only prevented payroll delays but also improved employee experience and reduced penalty costs, such as California’s “check-in-hand” requirement that separating employees must receive their final wages at the time of separation. As the payroll manager at a retailer explained, being able to meet this requirement put the company in a position to improve employee experience overall: “We’re also not missing those first paychecks for the retail staff. Yes, even if they only worked 2 or 3 hours their first week, they’re still getting paid on time.” In short, ADP HCM Managed Services transformed interviewees’ HCM operations by eliminating repetitive tasks and improving compliance, allowing them to redeploy significant headcount to more strategic work or handle growth without adding new hires. As the payroll manager at a retail organization summed up, “The greatest benefit is confidence that if I have back-to-back meetings for 10 hours, my payroll’s not falling behind schedule and not just being glanced at because we’re out of time.” The director of HR in the publishing industry also noted that leveraging ADP HCM Managed Services ensured “things get done … in a fashion where we’re still compliant.” Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of benefit in this area is related to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.5 million. + 88%Payroll team productivity Increased Payroll Team Productivity And Optimization
Reduced Legacy Software FeesEvidence and data. Interviewees specified various types of direct savings from software, services, and sometimes hardware costs they avoided after engaging with ADP HCM Managed Services. In some cases, these were competitive managed services providers; in others, they included third-party point solutions that were supplanted by managed services personnel and technology, as well as hardware such as time clocks or servers supporting legacy on-premises HR applications. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different financial impact in this benefit area depends on several factors:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $640,000. Reduced Legacy Software Fees
Savings On Payroll Hiring CostsEvidence and data. Before engaging ADP, interviewees found it difficult to retain qualified payroll practitioners, and even more difficult to recruit new ones as their long-term payroll team members retired. Payroll is a specialized discipline and can be difficult to source, especially in rural or competitive markets. Interviewees explained that these roles required deep knowledge of compliance and union rules that vary significantly in different geographic markets and industry verticals, making it costly and time-consuming to find qualified personnel. Interviewees agreed that ADP, with its focus on payroll operations, attracted top quality payroll practitioners because it offered them training, development, and a long-term career path within the function. With ADP taking on much of the payroll administration, these organizations were not faced with the challenge of retaining and/or recruiting new payroll talent in a very difficult marketplace. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of benefit in this area is related to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $546,000. Savings On Payroll Hiring Costs
Unquantified BenefitsInterviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
FlexibilityThe value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement ADP HCM Managed Services and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach). Analysis Of CostsQuantified cost data as applied to the compositeTotal Costs
Annual Fees Paid To ADPEvidence and data. Interviewees told Forrester that ADP offers a variety of pricing options for its ADP HCM Managed Services, based on factors such as the number of employees managed and the functions and capabilities the organization delegates to ADP. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of cost in this area is related to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.9 million. Annual Fees Paid To ADP
Implementation And TransitionEvidence and data. Interviewees described the implementation process as a significant but manageable effort, requiring dedicated internal resources over several months. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility recalled a year-long implementation that began in January and went live the following January, noting: “It was probably 50-ish percent of my time, plus two or three staff. The last three months, I would safely say three of us were working probably 70, 80 hours a week to get it done.” She also mentioned additional involvement from HR and IT staff for data transfer and system configuration and an implementation fee paid to consultants, which they characterized as typical for projects of this scale. Similarly, the director of HR at a publishing company described a more complicated process during their transition, which lasted about 14 months: “It was the only thing we were set out to do that year. The core team was me, my manager, a finance person, our HR specialist, and HRIS person, and then we pulled from the field.” She emphasized that most of the team’s time during this period was not spent implementing the transition to ADP ACM Managed Services. Rather, it was devoted to redesigning the company’s previous processes and consolidating systems before outsourcing, with consultants brought in to fill gaps. The senior manager of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company described a smaller-scale effort, involving the interviewee, the payroll manager, and the benefits manager working closely with ADP’s implementation team for six to 12 months, adjusting workloads to accommodate the transition. Across companies, interviewees agreed that although the upfront investment in time and cost was substantial, it was necessary to ensure a smooth transition and long-term efficiency. They stressed the importance of dedicating experienced staff and leveraging ADP’s implementation resources to manage complex data migrations, compliance requirements, and process redesign. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of cost in this area is related to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $794,000. Implementation And Transition
TrainingEvidence and data. Interviewees described training and change management as ongoing but essential components of successful transitions. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility explained that training was highly hands-on and timed to coincide with payroll cycles: “We started training the first pay period we went live. I went from group to group that Friday, and I went to other groups on Monday morning and was available for the first six payrolls.” They emphasized that this approach minimized disruption and ensured supervisors and payroll staff could troubleshoot real issues during live processing. They also noted that their team created job aids internally but later realized ADP could have provided these resources, suggesting an opportunity to reduce internal effort in future implementations. The payroll manager at a retail organization reported a heavy initial training commitment for the payroll team and ADP’s dedicated support team, and said, “In the beginning, I want to say it was like an hour a day, … 8 hours a week for the first six months.” They stressed the importance of continuous training whenever business processes changed or new ADP team members joined, reflecting an ongoing investment in knowledge transfer. Interviewees also noted that their programs required some change management work. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a utility mentioned cultural resistance to using ADP’s employee and manager support center and AI tools among field operations staff, requiring extra effort to encourage adoption. Similarly, the payroll manager in retail described the need to reassure employees during the transition to ADP HCM Managed Services, as some roles changed and responsibilities shifted. Although interviewees did not provide a dollar estimate for change management costs, all indicated that staff time was required for training, communication, and process redesign to ensure smooth adoption. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of cost in this area is related to:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $35,000. Training
Financial SummaryConsolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted MetricsCash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs
Total benefits
Cumulative net benefits
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
Please NoteThe financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis. These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section. The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur. From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in ADP HCM Managed Services. The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that ADP HCM Managed Services can have on an organization. Due DiligenceInterviewed ADP stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to ADP HCM Managed Services. InterviewsInterviewed four decision-makers at organizations using ADP HCM Managed Services to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks. Composite OrganizationDesigned a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations. Financial Model FrameworkConstructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees. Case StudyEmployed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology. Total Economic Impact ApproachBenefitsBenefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization. CostsCosts comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution. FlexibilityFlexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated. RisksRisks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.” Financial TerminologyPresent value (PV)The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows. Net present value (NPV)The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs. Return on investment (ROI)A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs. Discount rateThe interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%. PaybackThe breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost. Appendix ATotal Economic ImpactTotal Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. Appendix BSupplemental MaterialRelated Forrester Research The Forrester Wave: Human Capital Management Solutions, Q4 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., October 14, 2025. Appendix CEndnotes1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. 2 Source: Cost and risks due to payroll errors: Results of the 2022 HR Processing Risk and Cost Survey, EY, December 2022. 3 Source: Ibid. 4 Modeled Wage Estimates, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, August 2024. 5 Ibid. 6 Ibid. 7 Ibid. DisclosuresReaders should be aware of the following: This study is commissioned by ADP and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis. Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in HCM Managed Services. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with HCM Managed Services based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse ADP or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, ADP and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and ADP make no warranties of any kind. ADP reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study. ADP provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews. Consulting Team:Kim Finnerty PublishedFebruary 2026 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Total Economic Impact™ Of ADP HCM Managed Services
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html