Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of ADP HCM Managed Services

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By HCM Managed Services

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY ADP, February 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of ADP HCM Managed Services

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY ADP, February 2026

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By HCM Managed Services

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Organizations are increasingly leveraging human capital management (HCM) managed services to simplify workforce complexity, accelerate digital transformation, and improve financial alignment. As talent models expand beyond traditional employees to include contingent and gig workers, managed services deliver integrated service teams that act as extensions of clients’ HCM teams. These service teams handle daily tasks and offer strategic insights to boost efficiency, reduce administrative burden, and align the workforce with business goals. These solutions also bridge gaps in HR and financial data, reduce implementation risk for modern HCM platforms, and create personalized, consumer-grade employee experiences. The result is more agile, data-driven HR functions that support strategic business outcomes.

ADP HCM Managed Services is designed for midsize to large organizations, offering end-to-end administration of payroll and related HCM activities. At the heart of the solution is dedicated access to talent with deep industry and practice expertise in world-class payroll administration. Specific to this study, Forrester looked at ADP Managed Payroll Services and its effects on adjacent HCM functions.

ADP commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying HCM Managed Services.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of HCM Managed Services on their organizations.

251%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$11.9M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using HCM Managed Services. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a diversified organization with 5,000 employees and $600 million annual revenue.

Interviewees said that prior to using HCM Managed Services, their organizations employed multiple discrete software solutions, manual processes, and/or other managed services providers to handle their payroll work. As a result, they struggled to produce accurate payrolls, stay compliant with regulations, build effective contingency plans, and avoid overburdening their operational supervisors with payroll-related administrative tasks.

After the investment in HCM Managed Services, the interviewees described smoother, more professional, and more reliable HR-related functions. Key results from the investment include reduced compliance risk, more accurate payroll, and improved employee and manager experiences as a result of live support and self-serve mobile benefits and timekeeping. Organizations also saw improved productivity, with more time for managerial and strategic activities among frontline supervisors and HCM team members.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Reduced cost of payroll errors by $9.1 million. ADP HCM Managed Services delivers a major improvement in payroll accuracy, transforming processes from error-prone and chaotic to highly reliable. Errors are now minimal, which eliminates emergency fixes, reduces costly manual corrections, and avoids compliance penalties. These improvements also streamline payroll cycles, saving time, reducing overtime, and boosting employee confidence in timely, accurate pay.

  • Reduced manager time devoted to HR administration, saving the organization $3.9 million. ADP HCM Managed Services significantly reduces the time frontline supervisors and field managers spend on payroll and HR tasks, enabling them to focus on core operations. These tasks, which previously consumed 5 to 10 hours per week, now take less than 1 hour thanks to automation, mobile tools, and centralized support.

  • Increased HR team productivity and optimization, providing $2.5 million in value. ADP HCM Managed Services reduces the administrative workload for HR and payroll teams, enabling leaner staffing and freeing time for strategic initiatives. Tasks that once consumed entire days — such as data entry, payroll accuracy checks, and payroll error reprocessing — are now streamlined and shifted to the HCM Managed Services team. These efficiencies allow teams to process payroll earlier, avoid overtime, and redeploy resources to higher-value projects while maintaining compliance and improving employee experience.

  • Reduced legacy solution fees of $640,000. The composite experiences direct cost savings from retiring legacy solutions (including competitive managed services providers and/or HCM-related software and hardware) after implementing HCM Managed Services.

  • Savings on payroll hiring costs totaling $546,000. Recruiting and retaining experienced payroll practitioners was increasingly difficult for the composite. Incumbents were retiring and younger candidates saw payroll as a less desirable career choice. Because payroll requires specialized compliance and union expertise, especially in rural or competitive markets, moving to ADP relieved the composite of these costly, time-consuming challenges and provided access to highly trained professionals.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Improved security and business resilience. HCM Managed Services provides industry-leading, robust security and compliance resilience for the composite organization. Its advanced cybersecurity measures and cloud-based systems protect sensitive employee data and ensure continuity during disruptions, reducing risk and preventing penalties — capabilities that internal teams could not easily replicate.

  • Enhanced employee experience. HCM Managed Services enhances employee experience by ensuring accurate, on-time pay and providing fast, accessible support. Payroll issues and delays at the composite organization have virtually disappeared, boosting morale, while tools like the ADP-managed service center and mobile app give employees immediate assistance and self-service options, reducing frustration and saving time.

  • Strengthened compliance and risk mitigation. HCM Managed Services strengthens compliance and reduces risk by streamlining processes and leveraging specialized tools. Features like the Total Absence Management system, managed tax services, ADP Mobile Solutions, and ADP MyLife Advisors ensure adherence to complex federal and state regulations, minimize late filings, and cut audit preparation time from weeks to days.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Fees paid to ADP of $3.9 million. The cost of ADP HCM Managed Services over three years for the composite organization’s 5,000 employees.

  • Implementation and transition costs of $794,000. Initial implementation of HCM Managed Services requires a substantial but manageable investment of time and resources from the composite organization, primarily in optimizing its roles and processes before moving to a managed services model.

  • Training costs of $35,000. Internal training requires some ongoing hands-on effort, especially during the initial rollout. Incumbent HCM teams at the composite organization align sessions with live payroll cycles to minimize disruption and make ongoing investments in knowledge transfer and communication to overcome cultural resistance and role changes.

The financial analysis based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $16.7 million over three years versus costs of $4.7 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $11.9 million and an ROI of 251%.

“Three years after implementation, my internal team can actually take off on Fridays, meaning we’re that confident. Our pay dates are kind of a breeze.”

Payroll manager, retail

Key Statistics

251%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$16.7M

Benefits PV 

$11.9M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Reduced cost of payroll errors Reduced manager time devoted to HR administration Increased HR team productivity and optimization Reduced legacy software fees Savings on payroll hiring costs

The ADP HCM Managed Services Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the HCM Managed Services investment
Interviews
Role Industry Employees managed Managed services modules
Director of HR Publishing 1,500 Payroll, benefits, tax, time and attendance, onboarding, I-9 compliance
Senior manager, HR systems and operations Manufacturing 6,500 Payroll, timekeeping, tax, unemployment
Director, financial reporting and assurance Public utility 1,100 Payroll, timekeeping, compliance
Payroll manager Retail 3,500 Payroll, tax, compliance, service center
Key Challenges

Before adopting ADP HCM Managed Services, interviewees relied on a mix of internal teams and traditional systems to manage payroll and HR processes. Most of their organizations used in-house payroll staff supported by legacy HCM platforms or prior managed services vendors, often supplemented with manual processes for timekeeping, compliance tracking, and benefits administration. Several companies operated on older, fragmented systems that required separate tools for payroll, human resources information systems, and reporting, while others used regional or niche vendors for specific functions like tax filing or leave management. In some cases, HR duties were shared with finance staff in the field, and onboarding or recruiting processes were handled locally rather than through centralized platforms. Overall, their “before” states were characterized by internally managed, labor-intensive processes with limited automation and reliance on multiple disconnected solutions.

Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Payroll accuracy issues. Interviewees faced significant challenges with payroll accuracy, which created operational inefficiencies and compliance risks. The senior manager of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company described the situation as “chaotic.” Errors were frequent and often required emergency fixes, undermining trust and consuming valuable time, while also impacting attempts at financial reconciliation.
    These inaccuracies also had financial consequences described by each of the interviewees. Some reported that payroll mistakes led to tax filing errors, amended returns, and penalties. Others also noted that manual check issuance was very common before outsourcing, and late or incorrect paychecks damaged employee morale. Collectively, these challenges made payroll a source of disruption rather than stability, driving the need for a more reliable solution.

  • Compliance challenges. Interviewees faced significant compliance challenges, particularly in managing complex federal and state regulations across multiple jurisdictions. Organizations operating in multiple states struggled to keep up with varying tax laws, Affordable Care Act requirements, and leave policies, creating risk exposure and administrative burden because they lacked the tools and expertise to manage them effectively. These gaps often led to late filings, manual leave tracking, and increased vulnerability to penalties and fines. Audit preparation was another pain point, with interviewees stating that compliance reviews could take weeks to complete, consuming significant staff time and resources. Collectively, these issues made compliance a high-risk, labor-intensive process that interviewees were eager to streamline.

  • Payroll talent shortage. Interviewees described significant challenges in finding and retaining qualified payroll practitioners prior to adopting ADP HCM Managed Services. Several noted that payroll expertise is highly specialized and difficult to source, especially in rural or competitive markets. The director of HR at a publishing company explained that their organization had “a hard time finding people with the right skill set,” and even when they did, turnover was high because the work was stressful and transactional. Others emphasized that payroll roles required deep knowledge of compliance and union rules, making replacements costly and time-consuming. These staffing gaps often led to overwork for existing team members and increased risk of errors, driving the need for a managed services provider to ensure continuity and accuracy without relying on scarce internal talent.

  • Technology and security limitations. Interviewees faced significant limitations with security, scalability, and resilience. Several noted concerns about protecting sensitive employee data and the inability of legacy systems to provide robust cybersecurity measures. Interviewees relayed that their systems often lacked disaster recovery capabilities, creating business continuity risks during outages or natural disasters. Finally, those on older platforms struggled to keep pace with compliance updates and modern functionalities, leaving their organizations exposed to vulnerabilities and inefficiencies. These limitations made it difficult for internal teams to maintain confidence in data security and operational stability. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility emphasized this gap, explaining that they chose ADP HCM Managed Services for its combination of advanced security technology and deep organizational expertise in business continuity plans and practices.

“We had no confidence in whether or not we were paying people correctly, I know that for a fact. Leaders were stepping in to do payroll calculations. It was really bad.”

Senior manager, HR systems and operations, manufacturing

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The $600 million diversified organization, comprising manufacturing and retail operations, employs 5,000 people and experiences significant seasonality on the retail side. Before its move to ADP HCM Managed Services, a team of 50 HCM professionals managed payroll, timekeeping, benefits, talent acquisition, and learning and development for all employees (eight people specifically managed the payroll function). These professionals use a number of discrete, third-party software solutions, as well as manual processes, to manage their HCM functions.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization spends much of the year before it transitions to ADP HCM Managed Services preparing for the change by streamlining and operationalizing process improvements, clarifying roles, and training HCM team members in new responsibilities. It begins Year 1 by transitioning all affected HCM functions to ADP HCM Managed Services.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $600 million annual revenue

  • 5,000 employees

  • 50-person HCM team (including HRIS, benefits, learning and development, talent acquisition)

  • Eight-person payroll team

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Reduced cost of payroll errors $3,535,650 $3,732,075 $3,732,075 $10,999,800 $9,102,550
Btr Reduced manager time devoted to HR administration $1,281,150 $1,708,200 $1,708,200 $4,697,550 $3,859,813
Ctr Increased HR team productivity and optimization $1,185,566 $1,185,566 $592,783 $2,963,915 $2,502,961
Dtr Reduced legacy software fees $157,500 $315,000 $315,000 $787,500 $640,177
Etr Savings on payroll hiring costs $219,600 $219,600 $219,600 $658,800 $546,113
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $6,379,466 $7,160,441 $6,567,658 $20,107,565 $16,651,614
Reduced Cost Of Payroll Errors

Evidence and data. Interviewees consistently highlighted that ADP HCM Managed Services significantly improved their payroll accuracy, reducing errors and associated costs. The senior manager of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company contrasted the current state with prior chaos: “We had no confidence in our payroll and in whether or not we were paying people correctly. We used to call it the Wild West of payroll.” After moving to ADP, they reported that errors became “very minimal” and accuracy was “very good for years,” eliminating the need for emergency fixes and restoring employee trust. This improvement also resolved long-standing reconciliation issues: “We could never reconcile our general ledger in all those years with the prior vendor. That became a nonissue when we moved to ADP Managed Services.”

The financial benefits of accuracy were clear. The same senior manager of HR systems and operations in manufacturing explained that their previous managed services vendor made payroll errors that drove tax filing mistakes and penalties: “We definitely had a higher volume of [tax errors]. Knowing what we’re capable of today and how little issues we have, there were definitely errors on our previous vendor’s side.” By reducing corrections, the company avoided amended returns and compliance risks. Similarly, the director of HR at the publishing company noted that ADP’s rigorous checks cut payroll corrections, thus reducing fees for issuing manual checks: “Manual checks used to be outrageous. Now, we might go two to three months and only have one or two manual checks or errors.” This improvement not only saved money but also streamlined payroll cycles, allowing staff to finish processing earlier and avoid overtime. At the retail organization, the payroll manager reported, “We’re saving a lot of money on penalty pay.”

Improved accuracy also delivered operational benefits. At the publishing company, payroll deadlines became predictable thanks to ADP’s Managed Services guardrails. The payroll manager at a retail organization recalled that ADP’s proactive data checks prevented missed paychecks for new hires and seasonal staff, boosting morale and reducing escalations. They also described how ADP handled commission errors quickly, “If I get them on the phone at 9:30, by 11:00 they have already stopped payment and they’re giving me a preview.” These rapid corrections prevented reputational damage and ensured employees received accurate pay on time.

In short, improved payroll accuracy through ADP HCM Managed Services reduced compliance penalties, eliminated costly manual corrections, and enhanced employee confidence. The interviewees confirmed that the shift from systemic errors to stability meant payroll was no longer a source of disruption and, for some, was even a source of improved employee satisfaction and retention.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Payroll errors average three per employee per year, or a total of 15,000 each year across the company.2

  • The average cost of fixing a payroll error is $291.3

  • In Year 1, the organization avoids 90% of the payroll errors it was experiencing before deploying ADP HCM Managed Services. By Year 2, that rises to 95%.

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different financial impact in this benefit area depends on several factors:

  • The size of the organization.

  • The rate of payroll errors and the average cost of fixing them.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $9.1 million.

95%

Reduction in payroll errors

“Our payroll person was staying until 6 p.m. or 7 p.m. all the time. When we moved to ADP HCM Managed Services, she started to leave at maybe 5:30 p.m. daily, and on a Friday … at 3 p.m. or 4 p.m. with the rest of us.”

Director of HR, publishing

Reduced Cost Of Payroll Errors
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Employees Composite 5,000 5,000 5,000
A2 Frequency of payroll errors per 1,000 employees Research data 3,000 3,000 3,000
A3 Total payroll errors A1*A2 15,000 15,000 15,000
A4 Average cost of fixing a payroll error Research data $291 $291 $291
A5 Reduction in payroll errors with ADP HCM Managed Services Interviews 90% 95% 95%
At Reduced cost of payroll errors A3*A4*A5 $3,928,500 $4,146,750 $4,146,750
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Atr Reduced cost of payroll errors (risk-adjusted)   $3,535,650 $3,732,075 $3,732,075
Three-year total: $10,999,800 Three-year present value: $9,102,550
Reduced Manager Time Devoted To HR Administration

Evidence and data. Across all interviews, a major benefit of ADP HCM Managed Services was reducing the time frontline supervisors and field managers spent on payroll and HR-related tasks, allowing them to focus on core operational responsibilities. Interviewees explained that one of their goals was to give time back to their people, particularly supervisors in manufacturing plants, field locations, and retail floors. Before automation and ADP HCM Managed Services team expertise, these supervisors would spend from 5 to 10 hours a week managing complex timekeeping and payroll issues, HRIS tasks, hiring and onboarding, and benefits administration. Now, they average less than 1 hour a week, a dramatic reduction that keeps them on the floor, engaged with employees and/or customers, rather than behind a desk.

The senior manager of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company explained: “We’re a manufacturing company, and we have very complex payroll and timekeeping, just because of the manufacturing and the unions. If we didn’t have ADP HCM Managed Services, our supervisors would be spending a lot of time trying to manage that.”

Interviewees highlighted how ADP’s mobile app eliminated the need for field employees and their supervisors to drive to a central location to do their time sheets or share a single computer at job sites. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility recalled: “The mobile app really gave us a lot of that operational efficiency and probably more correct data. We no longer have people driving in to the operations center to do their weekly HR tasks. Their other option was to, one at a time, get on the supervisor’s computer to do their timesheets. So somebody would be off the job doing stuff on the computer and then they’d switch in and out, or the supervisor would end up doing a lot of it. This is a much better solution.” With the ADP mobile app, supervisors approve time remotely, saving hours each pay period and improving accuracy. Interviewees noted that this flexibility was critical for crews working in remote areas, where interruptions were costly and inefficient.

Customers also described how lean field teams benefited from ADP’s employee and manager support center and knowledge base. Instead of answering benefits or payroll questions themselves, supervisors direct employees to call centers, freeing time to work on finance or operational duties. The director of HR at a publishing company explained: “If [frontline employees] have benefits questions, we tell field staff to give them the number to the call center. Or if they just have general questions about policies and procedures, we have all of that information on the knowledge base. The call center will walk through the details that are on the knowledge base, and they’ll help employees that way.” This shift was especially valuable because all interviewees’ organizations were working to run with lean teams, meaning any time saved from administrative tasks directly impacted productivity.

Finally, the payroll manager at a retail organization reported that managers no longer faced complaints about missed paychecks, thanks to ADP’s proactive data checks and rapid issue resolution. As she put it, “No one’s coming, complaining to them that they didn’t get paid,” which boosted morale and reduced the time supervisors spent troubleshooting payroll problems.

In short, ADP HCM Managed Services streamlined processes that once consumed hours of supervisors’ and field managers’ time — whether through mobile tools, centralized support, or error prevention — allowing these leaders to stay focused on operations rather than administrative burdens.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The frontline supervisor/manager workforce totals 250 FTEs.

    • Half of the employee base is engaged in frontline work and management.
    • Each frontline supervisor manages approximately 10 people.

  • Before switching to ADP HCM Managed Services, each supervisor spends the equivalent of 8 hours a week engaged in HCM-related administrative tasks, such as timesheet reconciliation and approval, hiring-related and I-9 compliance activities, benefits questions, and training.

  • After the move to managed services, those supervisors spend approximately 5 hours a week on HCM-related tasks. As managers become more accustomed to leveraging the tools and expertise from ADP, they save an additional 1 hour per week in Year 2 and Year 3.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for these supervisors is $73.4

  • The organization recaptures 50% of the time saved with this benefit in productive labor.

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of benefit in this area is related to:

  • The size of its frontline supervisory staff relative to the rest of the organization.

  • The supervisors’ rate of pay.

  • The amount of time supervisors spend on HCM-related activities before moving to managed services.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.9 million.

4 hours/week

Time saved per supervisor on payroll-related tasks

“Most of our projects are oriented around trying to take some of the transactional HR activities away from our supervisors. The more they can be on the floor, the better.”

Senior manager, HR systems and operations, manufacturing

Reduced Manager Time Devoted To HR Administration
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 People managers Composite 250 250 250
B2 Time spent on payroll-related activities per supervisor before ADP HCM Managed Services (hours) Interviews 416 416 416
B3 Time spent on payroll-related activities per supervisor after ADP HCM Managed Services (hours) Interviews 260 208 208
B4 Average fully burdened hourly rate for people managers Research data $73 $73 $73
B5 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
Bt Reduced manager time devoted to HR administration B1*(B2-B3)*B4*B5 $1,423,500 $1,898,000 $1,898,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Btr Reduced manager time devoted to HR administration (risk-adjusted)   $1,281,150 $1,708,200 $1,708,200
Three-year total: $4,697,550 Three-year present value: $3,859,813
Increased Payroll Team Productivity And Optimization

Evidence and data. Interviewees emphasized that ADP HCM Managed Services dramatically reduced the administrative workload for HR and payroll teams, enabling leaner staffing and freeing time for strategic work. The payroll manager in a retail organization described the shift from constant pressure to confidence: “Friday was a no-no. You couldn’t take off on a Friday as a payroll administrator. Fast forward, three years after implementation, my team can actually take off on Fridays. … It’s quiet.” They explained that this improvement stemmed from ADP handling data validation, payroll previews, and compliance checks, which previously consumed entire days. They added that the team no longer spent hours on manual data entry or emergency corrections, noting: “I’m not spending hours keying in information. … ADP does it for us. Our pay dates are kind of a breeze.”

Interviewees provided specific use cases highlighting some of the time savings. The publishing company reduced audit preparation from “maybe 100 hours” to “under 36 hours” because “ADP can pull everything in an instant” for compliance reviews and 401(k) audits. The publishing company also saw annual payroll corrections fall by “80% to 90%,” saving hours of troubleshooting each cycle. The director of HR at the publishing company explained how ADP HCM Managed Services transformed the roles of many of the team’s managers in the field. They said, “We share HR duties with finance staff in the field, and what I’ve noticed is that [those employees] now have more time to do their finance duties because they can get their HR work done much more quickly in a designated time period.”

The director of HR in the publishing vertical also called out notable changes in workload on her team: “Some days our benefits manager wouldn’t even get anything done because she was on the phone all day answering questions, but now she doesn’t get behind because she partners with ADP.” She continued: “Our new payroll manager is actually able to go home at a decent time because payroll gets processed a day early. ADP allows her to focus more on processing information, pulling the reports, and supporting and servicing our internal people.”

At the manufacturing company, the senior manager of HR systems and operations summed it up, saying: “We are more project focused and can do more with less because my team’s not tied up in the transactional items. They have time to focus on other priorities or other projects that better the organization.” At the public utility company, the director of financial reporting and assurance relayed how ADP’s tools and partnership helped her team work faster and avoid bottlenecks.

These efficiencies not only prevented payroll delays but also improved employee experience and reduced penalty costs, such as California’s “check-in-hand” requirement that separating employees must receive their final wages at the time of separation. As the payroll manager at a retailer explained, being able to meet this requirement put the company in a position to improve employee experience overall: “We’re also not missing those first paychecks for the retail staff. Yes, even if they only worked 2 or 3 hours their first week, they’re still getting paid on time.”

In short, ADP HCM Managed Services transformed interviewees’ HCM operations by eliminating repetitive tasks and improving compliance, allowing them to redeploy significant headcount to more strategic work or handle growth without adding new hires. As the payroll manager at a retail organization summed up, “The greatest benefit is confidence that if I have back-to-back meetings for 10 hours, my payroll’s not falling behind schedule and not just being glanced at because we’re out of time.” The director of HR in the publishing industry also noted that leveraging ADP HCM Managed Services ensured “things get done … in a fashion where we’re still compliant.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite requires the equivalent of eight FTEs to support its payroll needs prior to outsourcing with ADP HCM Managed Services.

  • After outsourcing, it reduces payroll team requirements by 75% in Years 1 and 2, increasing to 88% in following years.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for the team is $82,331.5

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of benefit in this area is related to:

  • The size of the payroll team prior to implementation.

  • The average rate of pay for the team.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.5 million.

+ 88%

Payroll team productivity

“We still do the work; we just do it faster. When ADP came in, we worked together to optimize our processes.”

Director, financial reporting and assurance, public utility

Increased Payroll Team Productivity And Optimization
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Payroll FTEs required to support employee needs before ADP HCM Managed Services Composite 8 8 8
C2 Payroll FTEs required to support employee needs after ADP HCM Managed Services Interviews 2 2 1
C3 Average fully burdened annual salary for payroll FTEs Research data $82,331 $82,331 $82,331
Ct Increased payroll team productivity and optimization C1*C2*C3 $1,317,296 $1,317,296 $658,648
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ctr Increased payroll team productivity and optimization (risk-adjusted)   $1,185,566 $1,185,566 $592,783
Three-year total: $2,963,915 Three-year present value: $2,502,961
Reduced Legacy Software Fees

Evidence and data. Interviewees specified various types of direct savings from software, services, and sometimes hardware costs they avoided after engaging with ADP HCM Managed Services. In some cases, these were competitive managed services providers; in others, they included third-party point solutions that were supplanted by managed services personnel and technology, as well as hardware such as time clocks or servers supporting legacy on-premises HR applications.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It replaces one or more third-party payroll-related software solutions when it switches to ADP HCM Managed Services.

  • Annual fees for those solutions, including licensing fees and associated costs for updates, upgrades, testing, and configuration changes, total $350,000.

  • The organization fully sunsets these contracts an average of six months after switching to ADP HCM Managed Services.

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different financial impact in this benefit area depends on several factors:

  • The annual cost of legacy hardware, software, and competitive managed services solutions displaced once the organization transitions to ADP HCM Managed Services.

  • The length of time the organization continues to use and pay for those solutions after deploying ADP HCM Managed Services.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $640,000.

Reduced Legacy Software Fees
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Annual fees for software made redundant by ADP HCM Managed Services Interviews $350,000 $350,000 $350,000
D2 Cancellation rate for software contracts Composite 50% 100% 100%
Dt Reduced legacy software fees D1*D2 $175,000 $350,000 $350,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Dtr Reduced legacy software fees (risk-adjusted)   $157,500 $315,000 $315,000
Three-year total: $787,500 Three-year present value: $640,177
Savings On Payroll Hiring Costs

Evidence and data. Before engaging ADP, interviewees found it difficult to retain qualified payroll practitioners, and even more difficult to recruit new ones as their long-term payroll team members retired. Payroll is a specialized discipline and can be difficult to source, especially in rural or competitive markets. Interviewees explained that these roles required deep knowledge of compliance and union rules that vary significantly in different geographic markets and industry verticals, making it costly and time-consuming to find qualified personnel.

Interviewees agreed that ADP, with its focus on payroll operations, attracted top quality payroll practitioners because it offered them training, development, and a long-term career path within the function. With ADP taking on much of the payroll administration, these organizations were not faced with the challenge of retaining and/or recruiting new payroll talent in a very difficult marketplace.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Without the move to ADP HCM Managed Services, the organization would have needed to replace two payroll practitioners per year.

  • The average cost to replace a payroll practitioner is 200% of their average annual nominal (not fully burdened) salary, in this case $61,000.6 This comprises the cost of recruiting, interviewing, hiring, onboarding, and training a new payroll practitioner, as well as the cost of contractor staffing fees due to the scarcity of payroll talent and elongated time needed to fill open positions.

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of benefit in this area is related to:

  • The number of payroll practitioners on staff and their average churn rate.

  • The organization’s rate of pay for payroll practitioners.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $546,000.

Savings On Payroll Hiring Costs
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Payroll employee turnover Interviews 2 2 2
E2 Average cost to replace payroll employees (200% of salary) Research data $122,000 $122,000 $122,000
Et Savings on payroll hiring costs E2*E1 $244,000 $244,000 $244,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Etr Savings on payroll hiring costs (risk-adjusted)   $219,600 $219,600 $219,600
Three-year total: $658,800 Three-year present value: $546,113
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Improved security and business resilience. Interviewees emphasized that ADP HCM Managed Services delivered strong security and business resilience benefits, which were key drivers for adoption. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility stated: “Probably the biggest driver for me is the level of cybersecurity that ADP has. And the protection of the employee data. Their cybersecurity team is phenomenal. They took a hurricane to their main facility, and it was basically seamless to all of us.” Similarly, the director of HR at a publishing company highlighted the peace of mind from ADP’s cloud-based systems: “They house our data. They’re very secure. … It gives us peace of mind to know our information is safe.” These capabilities reduced risk, prevented penalties, and ensured continuity, offering value that smaller internal teams could not replicate.

  • Enhanced employee experience. Interviewees noted that ADP HCM Managed Services improved employee experience primarily by ensuring timely, accurate pay and providing accessible support. The payroll manager at a retailer explained that before moving to a managed services model, payroll days often created problems for first-line supervisors. Now, though, employees benefit from immediate assistance through the ADP-managed service center: “If an employee calls, they get an immediate response now instead of having to wait until a member of the HR team is back from vacation or a day off. It boosts morale all around.” Similarly, the senior manager of HR systems and operations at a public utility highlighted the convenience of the ADP mobile app, which allows field employees to manage time and benefits themselves from anywhere. These changes reduced frustration, saved time, and created confidence that payroll and benefits processes would run smoothly, contributing to a more positive overall employee experience.

  • Strengthened compliance and risk mitigation. Interviewees reported that HCM Managed Services significantly improved compliance and mitigated risk by streamlining processes and leveraging specialized tools. Companies operating across multiple jurisdictions found this especially valuable. As the director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility explained, “We use the Total Absence Management system for federal and state leaves and for ACA compliance.” ADP’s platforms and managed tax services helped interviewees deal with complex tax jurisdictions and leave laws, reducing exposure to penalties and fees such as late tax filings and ACA-related fines. The same director also noted dramatic efficiency gains in audit preparation, “Instead of it being maybe a few days, it would have been a couple of weeks [before ADP HCM Managed Services].” These improvements ensured timely filings, accurate reporting, and proactive compliance, effectively mitigating financial risk.

“We operate in 23 states. It’s imperative that we’re compliant.”

Director of HR, publishing

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement ADP HCM Managed Services and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Access to ADP Assist and coming AI tools. Interviewees expressed optimism about ADP’s AI capabilities as a way to further streamline processes and enhance efficiency. Although current benefits were not quantifiable, they acknowledged that AI-driven tools like ADP Assist and automation features already help reduce manual effort and provide real-time support for employees and managers. For example, the senior manager of HR systems and automation at a public utility noted that their operations team uses AI assist that’s available with the solution, highlighting its role in enabling self-service and minimizing reliance on payroll staff for routine inquiries. Interviewees said that they look forward to expansion of these AI capabilities to improve accuracy, accelerate issue resolution, and deliver greater flexibility for employees working nontraditional hours.

  • Broader adoption. The interviewees in this study currently use ADP HCM Managed Services primarily for payroll but see potential in adding capabilities like talent acquisition, advanced scheduling, or expanded benefits administration. For example, the director of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company reported that they use onboarding and E-Verify but leave recruiting local. Expanding centralized recruiting capabilities could streamline hiring for rural locations. The payroll manager at a retail organization said they plan to implement ADP for Canadian employees, signaling an opportunity to standardize processes across geographies for consistency and efficiency.

  • Enhanced self-service and mobile tools. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility emphasized the importance of ADP’s mobile app and suggested leveraging it further for training and communication, saying, “I’d even like to eventually have some training out there — just click on the button and do the training on your phone while you’re sitting.” This reflects an opportunity to use mobile capabilities for more than time entry, such as for learning and compliance updates.

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Ftr Annual fees paid to ADP $0 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $4,725,000 $3,916,792
Gtr Implementation and transition $793,786 $0 $0 $0 $793,786 $793,786
Htr Training and change management $31,648 $0 $0 $3,956 $35,604 $34,620
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $825,434 $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1,578,956 $5,554,390 $4,745,198
Annual Fees Paid To ADP

Evidence and data. Interviewees told Forrester that ADP offers a variety of pricing options for its ADP HCM Managed Services, based on factors such as the number of employees managed and the functions and capabilities the organization delegates to ADP.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It employs ADP HCM Managed Services to handle payroll-related functions for all of its 5,000 employees.

  • It pays ADP $25 per month ($300 per year) per employee for the full suite of HCM Managed Services capabilities.

  • Note: Pricing may vary. Contact ADP for additional details.

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of cost in this area is related to:

  • The number of employees whose HCM needs are managed by ADP.

  • The breadth of functions/capabilities for which the organization engages ADP.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.9 million.

Annual Fees Paid To ADP
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Employees managed with ADP HCM Managed Services Composite   5,000 5,000 5,000
F2 Annual fees per employee ADP   $300 $300 $300
Ft Annual fees paid to ADP F1*F2   $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
  Risk adjustment 5%        
Ftr Annual fees paid to ADP (risk-adjusted)     $1,575,000 $1,575,000 $1,575,000
Three-year total: $4,725,000 Three-year present value: $3,916,792
Implementation And Transition

Evidence and data. Interviewees described the implementation process as a significant but manageable effort, requiring dedicated internal resources over several months. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility recalled a year-long implementation that began in January and went live the following January, noting: “It was probably 50-ish percent of my time, plus two or three staff. The last three months, I would safely say three of us were working probably 70, 80 hours a week to get it done.” She also mentioned additional involvement from HR and IT staff for data transfer and system configuration and an implementation fee paid to consultants, which they characterized as typical for projects of this scale.

Similarly, the director of HR at a publishing company described a more complicated process during their transition, which lasted about 14 months: “It was the only thing we were set out to do that year. The core team was me, my manager, a finance person, our HR specialist, and HRIS person, and then we pulled from the field.” She emphasized that most of the team’s time during this period was not spent implementing the transition to ADP ACM Managed Services. Rather, it was devoted to redesigning the company’s previous processes and consolidating systems before outsourcing, with consultants brought in to fill gaps. The senior manager of HR systems and operations at a manufacturing company described a smaller-scale effort, involving the interviewee, the payroll manager, and the benefits manager working closely with ADP’s implementation team for six to 12 months, adjusting workloads to accommodate the transition.

Across companies, interviewees agreed that although the upfront investment in time and cost was substantial, it was necessary to ensure a smooth transition and long-term efficiency. They stressed the importance of dedicating experienced staff and leveraging ADP’s implementation resources to manage complex data migrations, compliance requirements, and process redesign.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Six senior HCM practitioners spend 80% of their time and four practitioners spend 40% of their time on preparation and transition-related activities.

  • The project period covers nine months.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for these practitioners is $73.

  • The organization also pays an IT consulting firm $175,000 in fees for implementation assistance.

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of cost in this area is related to:

  • The number of employees contributing to the transition project and the amount of time they devote to it.

  • The average rate of pay of contributing practitioners.

  • The need for, and the cost of, additional implementation services contracted for the transition.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $794,000.

Implementation And Transition
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 HCM team management involved in implementation Interviews 8      
G2 Weighted average percentage of time devoted to implementation work Interviews 60%      
G3 Time required to complete preparation and implementation (years) Interviews 0.75      
G4 Internal planning and implementation time (hours) G1*G2*G3* 2,080 7,488      
G5 Average fully burdened hourly rate for HCM team members Research data $73      
G6 Fees paid to implementation consultants Interviews $175,000 $0 $0 $0
Gt Implementation and transition G4*G5+G6 $721,624 $0 $0 $0
  Risk adjustment 10%        
Gtr Implementation and transition (risk-adjusted)   $793,786 $0 $0 $0
Three-year total: $793,786 Three-year present value: $793,786
Training

Evidence and data. Interviewees described training and change management as ongoing but essential components of successful transitions. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a public utility explained that training was highly hands-on and timed to coincide with payroll cycles: “We started training the first pay period we went live. I went from group to group that Friday, and I went to other groups on Monday morning and was available for the first six payrolls.” They emphasized that this approach minimized disruption and ensured supervisors and payroll staff could troubleshoot real issues during live processing. They also noted that their team created job aids internally but later realized ADP could have provided these resources, suggesting an opportunity to reduce internal effort in future implementations.

The payroll manager at a retail organization reported a heavy initial training commitment for the payroll team and ADP’s dedicated support team, and said, “In the beginning, I want to say it was like an hour a day, … 8 hours a week for the first six months.” They stressed the importance of continuous training whenever business processes changed or new ADP team members joined, reflecting an ongoing investment in knowledge transfer.

Interviewees also noted that their programs required some change management work. The director of financial reporting and assurance at a utility mentioned cultural resistance to using ADP’s employee and manager support center and AI tools among field operations staff, requiring extra effort to encourage adoption. Similarly, the payroll manager in retail described the need to reassure employees during the transition to ADP HCM Managed Services, as some roles changed and responsibilities shifted. Although interviewees did not provide a dollar estimate for change management costs, all indicated that staff time was required for training, communication, and process redesign to ensure smooth adoption.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • All 8 payroll practitioners receive 80 upfront hours of training in working with the managed services team and using ADP tools.

  • In Years 1 and 2,there is no turnover as employees remaining on the payroll team remain in place, but in Year 3, one payroll practitioner leaves and their replacement receives 80 hours of training.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for payroll practitioners is $43.7

Risks. The risk that another organization may experience a different level of cost in this area is related to:

  • The number of HCM practitioners who require training.

  • The amount of training provided.

  • The average rate of pay for HCM practitioners.

  • The extent of the change management effort undertaken as part of the transition.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $35,000.

Training
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
H1 Payroll team members requiring training Composite 8 0 0 1
H2 HCM training time (hours) Interviews 80 80 80 80
H3 Average fully burdened hourly rate for payroll specialists Research data $43 $43 $43 $43
Ht Training H1*H2*H3 $27,520 $0 $0 $3,440
  Risk adjustment 15%        
Htr Training (risk-adjusted)   $31,648 $0 $0 $3,956
Three-year total: $35,604 Three-year present value: $34,620

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($825,434) ($1,575,000) ($1,575,000) ($1,578,956) ($5,554,390) ($4,745,198)
Total benefits $0 $6,379,466 $7,160,441 $6,567,658 $20,107,565 $16,651,614
Net benefits ($825,434) $4,804,466 $5,585,441 $4,988,702 $14,553,176 $11,906,416
ROI           251%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in ADP HCM Managed Services.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that ADP HCM Managed Services can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed ADP stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to ADP HCM Managed Services.

Interviews

Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using ADP HCM Managed Services to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Supplemental Material

Related Forrester Research

The Forrester Wave: Human Capital Management Solutions, Q4 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., October 14, 2025.

Appendix C

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

2 Source: Cost and risks due to payroll errors: Results of the 2022 HR Processing Risk and Cost Survey, EY, December 2022.

3 Source: Ibid.

4 Modeled Wage Estimates, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, August 2024.

5 Ibid.

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by ADP and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in HCM Managed Services. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with HCM Managed Services based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse ADP or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, ADP and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and ADP make no warranties of any kind.

ADP reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

ADP provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Kim Finnerty

Published

February 2026

The Total Economic Impact™ Of ADP HCM Managed Services