Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Adobe CX Enterprise

Business Benefits And Cost Savings Enabled By Adobe CX Enterprise

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Adobe, SEPTEMBER 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Adobe CX Enterprise

Business Benefits And Cost Savings Enabled By Adobe CX Enterprise

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Adobe, SEPTEMBER 2026

Forrester Print Hero Background
T
B
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the way organizations approach customer experience orchestration (CXO). Marketers working to meet increasing customer demand for fresh, dynamic experiences stand to benefit from genAI tools as part of the content supply chain.1 Adobe CX Enterprise’s suite of AI-driven applications provides large organizations with the tools necessary to optimize and automate their CXO.

Adobe CX Enterprise is an end-to-end CXO solution, bringing together applications from across the Adobe ecosystem to support content supply chain, customer engagement, and brand visibility operations. AI is the foundation of Adobe CX Enterprise, facilitating automated content creation and insight generation to drive greater customer experiences.

Adobe commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying CX Enterprise.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of CX Enterprise on their organizations.

323%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$34.0M

Net present value (NPV)

 

2+ weeks

Time saved working on new digital projects with Adobe CX Enterprise

10% to 15%

Increase in conversions

5% to 10%

Increase in profit generation

4% to 8%

Improvement in customer retention

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers at multiple organizations and surveyed 213 decision-makers and business end users at global enterprises with experience using CX Enterprise applications. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a global, industry-agnostic, enterprise-sized company with $5 billion in annual revenue and 15,000 employees.

Interviewees said that prior to using all of the applications from Adobe CX Enterprise, their organizations took an à la carte approach to adopting Adobe’s applications. Leveraging best-of-breed third-party solutions and in-house platforms alongside Adobe applications led to technical challenges around sharing data between platforms, content requiring reformatting depending on the software, and general lack of collaboration with employees using different solutions. In-house solutions especially were falling behind in their ability to incorporate AI-based functionality to streamline processes. For interviewees, these issues limited their ability to meet demands for scaling content creation and making personalized digital experiences for customers.

Since adopting Adobe CX Enterprise, interviewees’ organizations accelerated production of new, engaging content with commercially safe genAI capabilities across Adobe Firefly, Creative Cloud for Enterprise, and other tools. They also leveraged AI insights from Adobe Experience Platform to deliver personalized, relevant experiences to audiences to drive business growth.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Employees save more than two weeks on each new digital project. Adobe CX Enterprise’s applications help employees to streamline production efficiencies on digital projects and empower them to be more self-sufficient. Adobe Workfront improves workflow visibility and coordination, while templates from Adobe Experience Manager and Adobe Express simplify the creative process. AI Agent tools enhance users’ abilities: Adobe GenStudio for Performance Marketing reduces manual content creation efforts to a simple prompt and Acrobat Pro summarizes and highlights information in documents. The composite organization realizes $8.0 million in productivity present value over three years.

  • Analysis efficiency on customer data and customer experience performance increases by 45%. Adobe CX Enterprise helps surface insights about customer behavior and business opportunities with its analytics layers, including Adobe Real-Time CDP and Customer Journey Analytics. These tools enable analysts to stitch together customer data from various channel touchpoints to create a holistic view of the customer, as well as build AI-based propensity models to better predict customer engagement. Analysts collect information and make it actionable faster to help inform organizational decision-making. Savings on performance analysis at the composite organization total $263,000 in Year 1 and climb to $948,000 by Year 3.

  • Developers free up 25% of the time previously spent creating customer experiences. Sales and marketing teams leverage templates in Adobe CX Enterprise and existing assets to scale customer experiences. Self-service for these users frees bandwidth among developers who typically support these projects. The three-year present value of this benefit for the composite organization is $293,000.

  • Increased efficiency saves millions in advertising and technology budget. Adobe CX Enterprise’s end-to-end capabilities toward supporting customer experiences enables the composite organization to offload overlapping third-party technologies. Meanwhile, advertisers use insights from analytics tools to identify more efficient ways to deploy their advertising budget. The composite organization has more budget to reallocate because of these benefits, totaling more than $10 million in three-year present value.

  • Digital customer conversions increase 15%. Employees incorporate customer insights from Adobe Real-Time CDP and Customer Journey Analytics to build more relevant, personalized customer experiences. As a result, audience engagement grows both in terms of site traffic and conversions and generates $150 million in additional revenue (before attribution and profit margin) in Year 1 alone. In three-year present value, this benefit totals $13.6 million for the composite organization.

  • Digital customers spend 10% more per conversion. Customers, spurred by more engaging experiences, spend more on the composite organization’s goods and services, including purchasing big-ticket items, adding more items to their cart, or upgrading their membership. Additional spending per conversion results in $82.5 million in revenue (before attribution and profit margin) in Year 1 at the composite organization. The benefit delivers $8.1 million in three-year present value.

  • Retention of digital customers grows 8%. Marketers and sales teams use insights from Adobe’s analytics capabilities to better understand areas where  customers experience friction that impacts brand loyalty. By addressing those challenges to make for smoother experiences, there is a stronger chance to retain the customer. The composite organization takes in $10.1 million in additional revenue (before attribution and profit margin) from retained customers in Year 1. Across three years, the present value of the benefit totals $1.9 million.

  • Offline transactions rise by 2.5%. Marketers and sales teams have a holistic view of the customer with Adobe Real-Time CDP and can reach them with Adobe Journey Optimizer through offline touchpoints like location-based promotions and notifications. By adding relevant offline opportunities for engagement the composite organization converts more customers, resulting in $7.0 million additional revenue (before attribution and profit margin) in Year 1. For this benefit, the three-year present value is $821,000.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Shared ecosystem of CXO solutions. Interviewees said that Adobe CX Enterprise users collaborate with a common set of shared applications more than they had previously, making it easier to share assets and access customer data insights. Solution admins do not have to worry as much about managing integrations with third-party solutions and licenses having migrated users to Adobe.

  • Enhanced day-to-day employee experience. Greater flexibility with building customer experiences, deeper insights into performance, and ease in iterating made for a better employee experience. Employees did not have to wait for support from designers and developers as frequently as in the past, and Adobe Workfront helped surface visibility on the status of projects.

Flexibility. While flexibility varies from organization to organization, Forrester identified multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Adobe CX Enterprise and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Agentic AI-powered operations. Adobe CX Enterprise offers agentic AI to automate tasks for users within all of its applications, streamlining usability for employees. For example, users are able to quickly summarize and find information with Adobe AI Assistant in Acrobat Pro or automate content generation with AI agents in Adobe GenStudio for Marketing.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Adobe software costs. The composite organization pays an annual cost based on the scale of operations with Adobe CX Enterprise and number of employees using its features.

  • Ongoing professional and managed service costs. The composite budgets for support services to assist implementation and continued success with Adobe CX Enterprise applications.

  • Premium cost of new hires. The composite organization adds employees with background in Adobe CX Enterprise applications to step in to train colleagues and help create best practices for the applications.

  • Training costs. Power users of Adobe CX Enterprise take upward of the equivalent of a week to learn best practices and how to effectively use its features. Self-service users spend the equivalent of a couple of days learning functionality that can help them.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $44.5 million over three years versus costs of $10.5 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $34.0 million and an ROI of 323%.

Key Statistics

323%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$44.5M

Benefits PV 

$34.0M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Employee productivity on customer experience projects Customer experience performance analysis efficiency Developer productivity on custom experience projects Efficiency in advertising, marketing, and technology costs Profit from additional digital customer conversions Higher digital profit generation Profit from improved digital customer retention Profit from additional offline conversions

The Adobe CX Enterprise Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the CX Enterprise investment

Interviews

Role Industry Region Annual Revenue
Senior VP of e-business
Chief marketing officer
Insurance Headquartered in North America, global operations $5+ billion
IT director Manufacturing Headquartered in North America, global operations <$30 billion
Demand generation leader Manufacturing Headquartered in North America, global operations <$40 billion
Product manager Technology Headquartered in North America, global operations $6 billion

Key Challenges

Prior to Adobe CX Enterprise, interviewees and survey respondents leveraged individual Adobe applications, third-party solutions, and in-house platforms for CXO purposes. Interviewees and survey respondents noted how their organizations struggled with several challenges from this approach, including:

  • Inefficient collaboration between teams in building content and digital experiences. Marketers, analysts, creatives, and others involved with building customer experiences leveraged multiple integrated solutions that led to challenges around customer data sitting in silos, asset sharing and collaboration, and general lack of oversight on project progress. In-house platforms in particular lacked AI-based capabilities to automate processes. These issues stifled organizations in scaling the creation of customer experiences, as well as their ability to make them dynamic and engaging.

  • Difficulty implementing CXO tools. Interviewees’ teams primarily used legacy analytic and content creation tools they were familiar with out of concern with the time required to set up new solutions. The demand generation leader at a manufacturing organization said: “We needed a solution that was easy to implement because technical resource support is a real challenge. You have to make sure that your internal team is able to support the capabilities that you purchase.” In addition, teams didn’t always have bandwidth to learn how to effectively use newer solutions, especially if the user interface wasn’t intuitive, which slowed adoption.

  • Lack of personalized customer experiences. Interviewees’ analysts lacked insights across touchpoints with customers, as well as time to review data to create specific audience segments. As a result, analysts often fell back on creating batches of customer types to align with experiences that had more generalized messaging. The product manager at a technology organization said, “We’ve historically built audience segments manually and used a batch process, defining some criteria like geography and account activity. What we lacked was the ability to generate audiences that were dynamic and that we could reach in real time, rather than only able to refresh on a regular cadence.”

  • Limited brand visibility across search and LLM solutions. Interviewees struggled to create engaging customer experiences with their legacy solutions, which also meant that they were unable to optimize their digital properties for search engines and LLM agents. Lack of appearances in search tools limited the reach of interviewees’ brands to audiences and were missed opportunities for the business.

What are your organizations investment priorities when it comes to Adobe CX Enterprise?

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Improve personalization capabilities Improve data and analytics use Improve marketing ROI/effectiveness Improve customer data quality Increase customer data and asset security and governance

Base: 213 IT decision-makers and end users at global enterprises
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Adobe, May 2026

Investment Objectives

The interviewees and survey respondents searched for a solution that could:

  • Enable greater content creation with self-service for marketers and AI-powered tools for employees outside of the creative team.

  • Encourage greater employee collaboration in building digital experiences, sharing data, and performing analysis.

  • Unify cross-channel customer data to create more complete customer profiles and improve data analysis.

  • Increase customer engagement by scaling relevant omnichannel experiences to drive revenue growth.

  • Improve the visibility of the brand across search and LLM platforms.

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a global, industry-agnostic enterprise with $5 billion in annual revenue and 15,000 employees. Among total revenue, $1.5 billion comes from e-commerce business and $3.5 billion from offline channels. Before adopting Adobe CX Enterprise, the composite organization took an à la carte approach to leveraging Adobe applications. Different teams had access to different Adobe applications, which led to challenges around building consistent customer experiences, personalizing the content, sharing customer insights, and fostering collaboration.

  • Deployment characteristics. The rollout of Adobe CX Enterprise to more than 200 power users at the composite organization in the first year includes applications from across the Adobe ecosystem like Adobe Analytics, Adobe Experience Manager, and Adobe Workfront. The organization also begins migrating customer data over to Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform. In Year 2, with data fully migrated, the organization begins using Adobe Journey Optimizer and Customer Journey Analytics. Employees also adopt more Adobe applications with AI capabilities like Adobe AI Assistant, Adobe Express, and Adobe Firefly. By Year 3, employees at the composite organization reach maturity with their usage of Adobe applications.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $5 billion in annual revenue

  • Industry-agnostic

  • 15,000 employees

  • 200+ Adobe users

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite

Total Benefits

Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Employee productivity on customer experience projects $2,047,013 $3,393,731 $4,453,150 $9,893,894 $8,011,375
Btr Customer experience performance analysis efficiency $263,250 $552,825 $947,700 $1,763,775 $1,408,219
Ctr Developer productivity on customer experience projects $89,856 $119,808 $149,760 $359,424 $293,219
Dtr Efficiency in advertising, marketing, and technology costs $3,600,000 $4,200,000 $4,800,000 $12,600,000 $10,350,113
Etr Profit from additional digital customer conversions $4,356,000 $5,544,000 $6,732,000 $16,632,000 $13,599,669
Ftr Higher digital profit generation $2,178,000 $3,341,250 $4,554,000 $10,073,250 $8,162,851
Gtr Profit from improved digital customer retention $266,112 $721,987 $1,366,042 $2,354,141 $1,864,931
Htr Profit from additional offline conversions $184,800 $369,600 $462,000 $1,016,400 $820,562
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $12,985,031 $18,243,201 $23,464,652 $54,692,884 $44,510,939

Employee Productivity On Customer Experience Projects

Evidence and data. Among survey respondents, 77% saw efficiencies in their end-to-end timeline for content production from Adobe CX Enterprise. A range of Adobe applications accelerated production efforts, including Adobe Experience Manager (65%), Workfront (56%), and Firefly genAI (50%) throughout planning and ideation, production, and launch phases. Time to finalize digital assets and/or digital experiences with Adobe CX Enterprise was “significantly faster” for 49% of respondents and “moderately faster” for another 33%.

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) provides users with templates and assets to build pages as well as features to expedite daily processes. For example, the product manager at a technology company described how they take thousands of pictures annually to use across promotional and branded efforts but must attach tags to each of the images. AEM streamlined that with AI-powered smart tags, the interviewee said: “One of our photographers took 6,000 photos, and that can take upward of 300 hours to manage between adding metadata and tagging each image so people can find them within our portal. With AEM’s smart tag AI, it automatically generated titles and descriptions for the uploaded images. Altogether, this took an hour and a half to review.”

Adobe Workfront was instrumental for managing workflow efficiency at interviewees’ organizations, with it providing greater visibility of workstreams. The demand generation leader at a manufacturing organization said they use Workfront to manage all of their demand generation requests, including webpage updates, email campaigns, and connecting a personalized email experience to a webpage.

“I love Workfront…It allows us to capture tasks, assign workers, and move it through, so everything is tracked. For leadership, Workfront is very insightful for showing how we have hundreds and thousands of requests to manage.”

Demand generation leader, manufacturing

With Adobe Firefly, interviewees’ creative employees could be more ambitious to create materials that power engaging digital experiences without having to loop in design support. The product manager at a technology organization said: “Firefly is an extension of skills. A designer who historically didn’t have the skills to build a 3D image can [do so] now. There is some time saved, but what we really saw was an enabling of a broader set of designers to do the type of work that [only] a select few used to be able to do.”

Adobe Express also helped non-creative employees build and iterate on assets by leveraging its genAI templates, which are trained on their branded materials. Instead of fielding requests with the design team to create assets and waiting for support, employees across departments could do it themselves. The product manager at a technology company said: “Adobe Express is a lightweight design tool that different marketers can use and don’t have to go and request work from creative teams. We’ve seen adoption grow quickly; some business stakeholders are bought in and seeing the value. They’re building out governance and templates to make it easier for others to use.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • The number of FTEs (both power users and part-time users) working with Adobe CX Enterprise applications increases from 150 in Year 1 to 200 in Year 3 as the composite organization establishes and shares best practices for each application.

  • “New customer experience projects” refers to planning and creating projects across marketing, content creation, and digital experiences. The FTEs dedicate three-quarters of their time (1,560 working hours each) annually to these projects. The efficiency recognized in this work climbs incrementally from 20% in Year 1 to 35% in Year 3 as the composite organization becomes more mature with leveraging Adobe CX Enterprise applications and as more employees adopt them.

  • Each FTE dedicates one-quarter of their time (520 working hours each) per year to iterating on customer experience projects. They gain 35% efficiency working on these projects in Year 1, which increases to 50% in Year 3. This gain is driven by the creation of low-code templates, Firefly-created visuals, and reusable assets. As employees at the composite organization create and add more assets that can be repurposed for later use, they realize more time savings.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for each employee using Adobe CX Enterprise is $65.

  • Employees rededicate 50% of their time savings toward additional work, and they use the remaining 50% to take longer breaks or work fewer late nights, which qualitatively improves the overall employee experience.

2+ weeks

Time saved working on new digital projects with Adobe CX Enterprise

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact the benefits include the following:

  • The types of Adobe CX Enterprise applications and the complexity of projects that influence timeline length.

  • The number of employees who adopt Adobe CX Enterprise for digital experience projects.

  • The hourly rate for employees.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $8.0 million.

Employee Productivity On Customer Experience Projects

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Full-time equivalent, non-IT FTEs working on customer experience projects (e.g., content, digital assets, marketing campaigns, etc.) Composite 150 175 200
A2 Time spent on a new customer experience project before Adobe CX Enterprise (weeks) Composite 6 6 6
A3 Percentage efficiency on new customer experience projects with Adobe CX Enterprise applications Interviews and survey 20% 30% 35%
A4 Time spent on a customer experience project with Adobe CX Enterprise (weeks) A2-(A2*A3) 4.8 4.2 3.9
A5 Subtotal: Time savings on new customer experience projects (hours) A1*A3*75% of 2,080 annual work hours 46,800 81,900 109,200
A6 Time spent on project iterations/refreshes before Adobe CX Enterprise (weeks) Composite 2 2 2
A7 Percentage efficiency on customer experience project iterations/refreshes with Adobe CX Enterprise applications Interviews and survey 35% 45% 50%
A8 Time spent on customer experience project iterations/refreshes with Adobe CX Enterprise (weeks) A6-(A6*A7) 1.3 1.1 1.0
A9 Subtotal: Time savings on customer experience project iterations/refreshes (hours) A1*A7*25% of 2,080 annual work hours 27,300 40,950 52,000
A10 Average blended, fully burdened hourly rate for employees Composite $65 $65 $65
A11 Productivity recapture rate TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
At Employee productivity on customer experience projects (A5+A9)*A10*A11 $2,408,250 $3,992,625 $5,239,000
  Risk adjustment ↓15%      
Atr Employee productivity on customer experience projects (risk-adjusted)   $2,047,013 $3,393,731 $4,453,150
Three-year total: $9,893,894 Three-year present value: $8,011,375

Customer Experience Performance Analysis Efficiency

Evidence and data. More than two-thirds (68%) of survey respondents agreed that Adobe CX Enterprise increased data visibility for them to generate actionable insights. Alongside Adobe Analytics, critical to improved analysis were Adobe Customer Journey Analytics and Adobe Real-Time Customer Data Platform (CDP) powered by Adobe Experience Platform, which surfaced customer-level insights and streamlined management of customer data.

The IT director at a manufacturing organization said: “We do analytics more efficiently [with Adobe]. With real-time analytics of the customer experience, we can do things like gauge how frustrated a customer may be and make different pricing offerings to proactively counter their experience.” The interviewee described the more complete view they have on customers through tracking engagement across channels. They added Adobe Customer Journey Analytics earlier this year and were already seeing its value. The IT director said: “That’s been useful in terms of providing dashboards to give us insights on the customer journey, right from them clicking on an ad on some other site and landing on ours. We have a lot of ad dollars in the upstream funnel, and CJA helps us track all of that.”

“We have a 360-degree view of the customer stitched together from their visits to our site and sister brand pages. It eliminates vagueness around their profile. When they land at our site again, we have behavior analytics to leverage to create a more personalized experience.”

IT director, manufacturing

The senior VP of e-business at an insurance company shared that the Customer AI propensity model in Adobe Experience Platform helped them identify business opportunities they otherwise wouldn’t have caught. In one example, they shared how a business partner typically targeted messaging toward families in vacation areas to purchase insurance while traveling. When they saw some traction in weekend drivers renting a car to leave major cities for the weekend, they realized there was additional business there. The interviewee said: “We would have never prioritized targeting those customers. That would’ve taken us forever to figure out, but Customer AI in AEP actually built propensity models based on customer data. We could make just as much from weekend rentals than people traveling in vacation areas. That was a cool learning.”

Users of these applications also moved faster in creating audiences to target with relevant experiences. Nearly two-thirds (65%) of survey respondents saw increased self-service among employees in customer profile data management. Marketers and sales teams didn’t have to rely on analysts to piece together customer data to build audiences. The demand generation leader at a manufacturing organization said their analysts still owned the process for building audiences, but educating marketing and sales teams on the CDP got them excited for its targeting potential. The interviewee said: “Adobe Analytics tools are huge for us because of what we can do with experience targeting based on X, Y, Z requirements like whether the customer visited in the last three months or made a purchase. There’s tons of potential for what we can do with it.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • The number of employees who manage customer data and analysis increases from 10 in Year 1 to 20 in Year 3 as more departments adopt Adobe CX Enterprise.

  • Analysis efficiency improves by 25% in Year 1 and increases to 45% by Year 3 as teams grow in maturity with the applications and collect greater insights from customer data.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for a performance analyst is $75.

  • The composite organization sees 75% in time savings based on the assumption that reduced manual effort around data management allows employees to take more breaks.

45%

Increased efficiency in performance analysis with Adobe CX Enterprise

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The amount of customer data being analyzed with Adobe CX Enterprise applications.

  • The number of analysts at the organization and their hourly rate.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.4 million.

Customer Experience Performance Analysis Efficiency

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Employees overseeing performance analysis Composite 10 15 20
B2 Percentage efficiency in performance analysis Interviews and survey 25% 35% 45%
B3 Subtotal: Time savings on performance analysis (hours) B1*2,080 annual work hours*B2 5,200 10,920 18,720
B4 Fully burdened hourly rate for a performance analyst Composite $75 $75 $75
B5 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 75% 75% 75%
Bt Customer experience performance analysis efficiency B3*B4*B5 $292,500 $614,250 $1,053,000
  Risk adjustment ↓10%      
Btr Customer experience performance analysis efficiency (risk-adjusted)   $263,250 $552,825 $947,700
Three-year total: $1,763,775 Three-year present value: $1,408,219

Developer Productivity On Customer Experience Projects

Evidence and data. Sales and marketing team members relied less on developers to assist with building technically challenging customer journey projects because of the ease of use of Adobe CX Enterprise features. Among survey respondents, 54% self-serviced Adobe Experience Manager’s low-code templates to build pages, and 43% built out agentic support for customers with limited support. Specifically for AI agents supporting customers, 31% found that Adobe CX Enterprise streamlined the creation and maintenance of agents.

Interviewees noted how Adobe Experience Manager’s templates, assets, and connected architecture simplified building out digital experiences. The IT director at a manufacturing organization shared that edits that users make to one webpage are propagated across different channels in the omnichannel experience. They said, “We are able to reuse a lot of design and development components [with AEM Assets] across our webpages that we couldn’t do earlier with our previous CMS, which helps us with cost optimization.” Instead of repeatedly turning to developers for support for each digital experience, users could scale these experiences on their own. This helped to free bandwidth for technical teams to work on new projects for the organization.

The simplicity of Adobe’s template coding also made for fewer issues that could lead to downtime and require developer support. The IT director at a manufacturing organization shared: “There’s no outage whatsoever. A frustrated customer, whether it’s page performance or site downtime, will go to a competitor. Adobe has helped us with uptime with these applications that contribute to site traffic.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • Twenty developers are tasked with supporting digital experience projects. They are looped into projects when needed and allocate one-fifth of their time to these projects.

  • In Year 1, developers spend 15% less time supporting projects, and by Year 3, they spend 25% less time as more employees are able to self-service tasks with Adobe CX Enterprise.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for a developer is $80.

  • Forrester did not apply a productivity recapture rate to this efficiency because the small scale of the time savings means that nearly all the saved time is reallocated to other work.

25%

Reduction in time spent by developers supporting projects

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The number of developers who support digital experience projects and amount of time allocated to the work.

  • The hourly rate for the developers.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $293,000.

Developer Productivity On Customer Experience Projects

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Developers supporting projects and development Composite 20 20 20
C2 Reduction in time spent supporting projects and development Interviews and survey 15% 20% 25%
C3 Subtotal: Time spent supporting projects and development (hours) C1*C2*20% of 2,080 annual work hours*C2 1,248 1,664 2,080
C4 Fully burdened hourly rate of developers Composite $80 $80 $80
Ct Developer productivity on customer experience projects C3*C4 $99,840 $133,120 $166,400
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ctr Developer productivity on customer experience projects (risk-adjusted)   $89,856 $119,808 $149,760
Three-year total: $359,424 Three-year present value: $293,219

Efficiency In Advertising, Marketing, And Technology Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents who relied on various third-party technologies to manage CXO found they could accomplish that work with the end-to-end capabilities of Adobe CX Enterprise, allowing them to avoid costs by consolidating their operations around Adobe. Alongside costs saved on individual solution licensing, organizations avoided costs from IT administrators managing integrations between applications and ensuring systems ran as expected. According to survey respondents, 68% saw IT teams experience efficiencies around maintaining integrations, and 51% became more efficient in applying updates.

With Adobe CX Enterprise facilitating a content supply chain for organizations, admins were able to eliminate repositories where assets resided. Individuals working on creative projects were able to find what they were looking for with Adobe Experience Manager’s (AEM) smart tags, which improved searchability of readily accessible assets and templates across AEM and Adobe Express. The product manager at the technology company said they removed four separate repositories for assets, as it was now easier for users to find them in their network.

Interviewees also became more efficient with their ad dollars due to insights from Adobe’s analytic applications, which provided guidance on where to target customers and shortened buying cycles by serving more relevant content. Whereas customers may have been exposed to more ads in the past to drive a conversion, it now took fewer ads to convert because of effective targeting. As a result, ad dollars were reallocated toward other customers. The senior VP of e-business at an insurance organization said: “Real-Time CDP data is more powerful than anything we ever had in the past because we can see the full end-to-end of the customer experience. Did someone submit something online, and did they buy it? Did a quote or lead go to an agent, and did that convert? We see all those trails and how to best reach customers in real time.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • Avoided legacy solutions and support costs total $500,000 in Year 1 and increase as more solutions are offloaded and operations move to Adobe CX Enterprise.

  • The composite organization has $20 million in digital ad spend that can be optimized with ads delivered repeatedly to the same customers with little impact. After adopting Adobe CX Enterprise, advertisers leverage insights from its applications to more effectively target customers with unique, relevant messaging that accelerates customer journeys. The composite organization becomes more effective with its advertising spend by 20% in Year 1, and this increases to 25% by Year 3 as it continues to lean on data insights to guide spending.

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The size of the organization and scale of customer experience operations before adopting Adobe CX Enterprise.

  • The organization’s budget for advertising, marketing, and technology.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $10.4 million.

Efficiency In Advertising, Marketing, And Technology Costs

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Subtotal: Annual avoided costs from offloaded legacy solutions (e.g., legacy system and support costs) Interviews and survey $500,000 $750,000 $1,000,000
D2 Annual ad spending that can be optimized Composite $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000
D3 Percentage efficiency in ad spending with Adobe CX Enterprise applications Interviews and survey 20.0% 22.5% 25.0%
D4 Subtotal: Value of efficiency with ad spending D2*D3 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000
Dt Efficiency in advertising, marketing, and technology costs D1+D4 $4,500,000 $5,250,000 $6,000,000
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Dtr Efficiency in advertising, marketing, and technology costs (risk-adjusted)   $3,600,000 $4,200,000 $4,800,000
Three-year total: $12,600,000 Three-year present value: $10,350,113

Profit From Additional Digital Customer Conversions

Evidence and data. Improved brand visibility, greater insights about customers, and the ability to engage them in real time with relevant content helped drive greater conversions for organizations. Among survey respondents, 63% saw an increase in conversions since adopting Adobe CX Enterprise applications, 55% experienced growth in leads and prospects, and 48% reported greater reach per month.

The IT director at a manufacturing organization turned to Adobe Customer Journey Analytics to understand how they were performing with agentic engine optimization (AEO) and generative engine optimization (GEO). Many business buyers leverage LLMs in their research process; improving visibility in LLM results can drive opportunity for organizations. The IT director said: “The main goal is to see how agents are viewing our site, the content of the page, and what is being indexed. Citations are a big deal, and if we can improve content tagging and all that, it makes it more relevant from an agent’s perspective. That’s what we are looking for this tool to provide.”

Once arriving at a business site, integrations with applications like Adobe Commerce and its ability to quickly load pages and incorporate customer insights to personalize messaging accelerated steps in the customer journey. Reduced friction for customers created smoother experiences, and according to 39% of survey respondents, monthly site and business traffic increased with Adobe CX Enterprise.

For the senior VP of e-business at an insurance organization, the range of capabilities available with Adobe CX Enterprise helped connect the dots when building experiences. The interviewee said: “We’ll take one tool, test it out, and watch the results to see how conversions are impacted. For example, we tripled the conversion rate when we used Customer AI in Real-Time CDP to deliver personalized experiences.” They continued: “We’ve also used customer data from Real-Time CDP for targeting with email sends in Adobe Journey Optimizer. We can only talk to customers so many times, so we have to be able to do it at the right time. Without customer data from Real-Time CDP, that would be nearly impossible.”

The interviewee factored in Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target to maximize the impact of Adobe Advertising Cloud. Users got statistical validation in the form of clicks and conversions from two different versions of advertising sent to customers. The senior VP added: “We have end-to-end visibility [with the solutions] and can look at dollars spent all the way through to transaction. The level and degree of the information we get support our philosophy on testing being more scientific than it is creative. If we see consistent 20% wins on our tests over time, that’s massive and a great return on investment.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • The size of the digital audience reached is based on the number of individuals who have visited the company site in the past 12 months. This total is 750 million for the composite organization. The size of the audience grows in 1% in Year 1, 1.5% in Year 2, and 2% in Year 3 as the composite organization becomes more efficient with reaching audiences with relevant messaging.

  • The blended conversion rate before using Adobe CX Enterprise is 2% across all three years.

  • The average conversion rate increases as users leverage customer data to effectively engage and enhance the personalization of customer experiences. In Year 1, the conversion rate increases by 10% to 2.2%, leading to 1.5 million additional conversions. By Year 3, the conversion rate reaches 2.3%, representing a 0.3% gain over the baseline conversion rate, resulting in 2.3 million additional conversions.

  • The assumed average order value (AOV) or value of customer conversion (non-purchase-specific) is $100 based on the size of the composite organization and number of customers.

  • The attribution rate to Adobe CX Enterprise is 33% based on Forrester’s research-based understanding of how people, processes, and technology collaborate to drive conversions. Forrester’s assumption takes into consideration credit given to creative teams, production work, market factors, and general interest in the product itself.

  • The 10% profit margin is blended and based on the industries considered for analysis.

15%

Increase in conversions with Adobe CX Enterprise

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The size of the digital audience the organization reaches annually, goals in conversions (e.g., customer page visits, subscriptions, purchases), prior conversion rates, and the value of a conversion.

  • The adoption of Adobe CX Enterprise applications and the organization’s overall goals with the platform.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $13.6 million.

Profit From Additional Digital Customer Conversions

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Website visits Composite 750,000,000 750,000,000 750,000,000
E2 Growth in visits Interviews and survey 1.0% 1.5% 2.0%
E3 Subtotal: Annual additional visits with Adobe CX Enterprise E1*E2 7,500,000 11,250,000 15,000,000
E4 Conversion rate (blended) before Adobe CX Enterprise Composite 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
E5 Average order value/customer conversion value Composite $100 $100 $100
E6 Subtotal: Value of additional audience reach E3*E4*E5 $15,000,000 $22,500,000 $30,000,000
E7 Improvement in conversions with Adobe CX Enterprise Interviews and survey 10% 12.5% 15.0%
E8 Conversion rate (blended) with Adobe CX Enterprise E4+(E4*E7) 2.20% 2.25% 2.30%
E9 Additional converted audience E1*(E8-E4) 1,500,000 1,875,000 2,250,000
E10 Subtotal: Value of additional conversions E5*E9 $150,000,000 $187,500,000 $225,000,000
E11 Attribution to Adobe CX Enterprise TEI methodology 33% 33% 33%
E12 Profit margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
Et Profit from additional digital customer conversions (E6+E10)*E11*E12 $5,445,000 $6,930,000 $8,415,000
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Etr Profit from additional digital customer conversions (risk-adjusted)   $4,356,000 $5,544,000 $6,732,000
Three-year total: $16,632,000 Three-year present value: $13,599,669

Higher Digital Profit Generation

Evidence and data. More than half of survey respondents (52%) agreed that Adobe CX Enterprise has enabled increases in digital revenue for their organization. In terms of scale, nearly one-fifth (19.6%) of their organization’s digital revenue was impacted by or involved with Adobe CX Enterprise. According to interviewees, revenue growth was driven in part by increases in spending among customers who were spurred on by more engaging experiences to spend big on a single item, add more to their cart, or upgrade their membership.

The senior VP of e-business at a manufacturing organization leveraged customer data from Real-Time CDP to specifically target customers on the next visit to their website. They said: “What’s cool about Real-Time CDP is that next hit. If someone goes and does something, we are able to present offers on the next page they land on during their digital experience. We have dynamic offers throughout our site — the customers don’t know that.” The organization saw at least a 30% increase in sales from conversions of those more personalized customer journeys.

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • The number of customers is based on the conversion rate of the digital audience after using Adobe CX Enterprise.

  • Revenue per conversion increases by 5% in Year 1 as enhanced customer experiences improve their favorability toward spending more with the organization. The revenue per conversion grows to a 10% improvement in Year 3 as more of the organization leverages customer data to engage customers.

  • In Year 1, an additional $5 spent per converted customer totals $82.5 million in additional value. The additional value per customer climbs to $10 in Year 3, leading to $172.5 million in additional value for the organization.

  • Assumptions about attribution and profit margin are the same as those in Benefit E.

10%

Increase in profit generation with Adobe CX Enterprise

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The number of converted customers and the average value of each customer.

  • The organization’s offerings that could lead to increases in customer value.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $8.2 million.

Higher Digital Profit Generation

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Digital customers E1*E8 16,500,000 16,875,000 17,250,000
F2 Average order value/customer conversion value before Adobe CX Enterprise E5 $100 $100 $100
F3 Cumulative percentage gain in revenue per conversion Interviews and survey 5.0% 7.50% 10.0%
F4 Average order value/customer conversion value with Adobe CX Enterprise Y1: F2+(F2*F3)
Y2 and Y3: (F3*F4PY)+F4PY
$105.00 $107.50 $110.00
F5 Additional value generated with Adobe CX Enterprise F1*(F4-F2) $82,500,000 $126,562,500 $172,500,000
F6 Attribution to Adobe CX Enterprise TEI methodology 33% 33% 33%
F7 Profit margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
Ft Higher digital profit generation F5*F6*F7 $2,722,500 $4,176,563 $5,692,500
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Ftr Higher digital profit generation (risk-adjusted)   $2,178,000 $3,341,250 $4,554,000
Three-year total: $10,073,250 Three-year present value: $8,162,851

Profit From Improved Digital Customer Retention

Evidence and data. Interviewees leveraged their end-to-end view of the customer with Adobe CX Enterprise to understand how best to reengage customers. Customer interactions with their organization’s site, as well as competitors’ shopping sites through third-party data, helped to illustrate to users how to maintain their engagement and loyalty. The senior VP of e-business at an insurance organization said: “How we’re able to follow customers is different with Adobe. We can stitch together insights on customers from sites they’ve previously visited, and we can make assumptions from there. That allows us to close a loop on finding out if it’s someone we hadn’t seen or is a returning customer.”

According to survey respondents, 70% reported an increase in customer engagement since adopting Adobe CX Enterprise. Users incorporated customer insight learnings to personalize pages through applications like Adobe Commerce to make for a more relevant experience.

Users also leveraged data to identify bottlenecks in the customer experience where business with the customer was at risk. The IT director at a manufacturing organization said: “If a customer makes a call with our call center expressing their frustration, when they come back on our website, we can counter that experience with an offer. That’s our ultimate goal here. In Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, we have dashboards giving us insights on every step of the customer journey. It helps us keep track of all that.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • In Year 1, the composite sees 16 million returning customers. After accounting for customer churn and newly added customers from the previous year, there are 13.2 million returning customers in Year 2 and 13.5 million in Year 3. Forrester did not factor in additional customers retained after using Adobe for the following year’s returning customer base to avoid double-counting their value.

  • With Adobe CX Enterprise, retention improves by 4% in Year 1. The rate improves to 6% in Year 2 and 8% in Year 3 as the composite organization fine-tunes engagement with the customer based on the increasing amount of data available to them.

  • Each retained customer goes on to make purchases in successive years at a higher AOV rate. The retained customers in Year 1 are converted in Year 2 and Year 3, while retained customers in Year 2 are converted in Year 3 and generate $110 in value each. Additional customers retained in Year 3 generate value that falls outside this study’s analysis parameters.

  • Assumptions about attribution and profit margin are the same as Benefit E.

8%

Improvement in customer retention with Adobe CX Enterprise

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The number of customers who spend on the composite organization’s goods and services annually.

  • The lifetime value of customers.

  • The likelihood of customer churn.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.9 million.

Profit From Improved Digital Customer Retention

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Attrition rate Composite 20.00% 20.00% 20.00%
G2 Returning digital customers each year with previous attrition rate (excluding already-retained customers listed in row G4; rounded) Y1: (E1*E4)-(E1*E4*G1)
Y2 and Y3: (E1*E8 PY)-(E1*E8 PY*G1)
12,000,000 13,200,000 13,500,000
G3 Improvement with Adobe CX Enterprise Interviews and survey 4.0% 6.0% 8.0%
G4 Subtotal: Additionally retained digital customers (cumulative) G1*G2*G3 + G4 PY 96,000 254,400 470,400
G5 Incremental annual revenue of retained customers F4 $105.0 $107.5 $110.0
G6 Subtotal: Revenue from retained customers G4*G5 $10,080,000 $27,348,000 $51,744,000
G7 Attribution to Adobe CX Enterprise TEI methodology 33% 33% 33%
G8 Profit margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
Gt Profit from improved digital customer retention G6*G7*G8 $332,640 $902,484 $1,707,552
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Gtr Profit from improved digital customer retention (risk-adjusted)   $266,112 $721,987 $1,366,042
Three-year total: $2,354,141 Three-year present value: $1,864,931

Profit From Additional Offline Conversions

Evidence and data. The holistic, unified view of the customer provided by Adobe Real-Time CDP, as well as the ability to identify offline touchpoints (e.g., location-based advertising and notifications) through Adobe Journey Optimizer, drove additional value for organizations. According to survey respondents, two-thirds (67%) saw an increase in conversion rates, and more than half (53%) saw gains in business or foot traffic. This had a meaningful impact on their organizations, with an average of 14% of their offline revenue being impacted by Adobe CX Enterprise.

A key factor supporting offline engagement is the types of customer data that can be analyzed. According to survey respondents, 74% incorporate CRM data, 62% use call center data, and 40% leverage in-store data. These data points help inform sales teams about opportunities to engage with customers and which steps of the customer journey involve digital and offline interactions. The senior VP of e-business at an insurance company shared: “We can see in our data if a lead came from a marketing campaign and if it was closed with an agent offline. We’re following their path all the way through with device and identity data management.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:

  • Offline revenue totals $3.5 billion each year, and 20% is impacted by transactions that originated from digital interactions.

  • The customer transaction rate increases by 1% in Year 1 and improves by 2.5% in Year 3, driven by Adobe CX Enterprise helping users to identify opportunities to effectively engage customers offline.

  • To account for people, process, and technology influences, 33% of the value is attributed to Adobe.

  • The global profit margin for offline revenue is 10%.

2.5%

Increase in offline transactions with Adobe CX Enterprise

Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact this benefit include the following:

  • The scale of offline business as a portion of total revenue.

  • Investment, adoption, and maturity of Adobe CX Enterprise applications like Adobe Real-Time CDP, Customer Journey Analytics, and Journey Optimizer.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $821,000.

Profit From Additional Offline Conversions

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
H1 Annual offline revenue Composite $3,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000 $3,500,000,000
H2 Percentage of revenue impacted by digital interactions Composite 20% 20% 20%
H3 Improvement in offline transactions with Adobe CX Enterprise Interviews and survey 1.00% 2.00% 2.50%
H4 Subtotal: Additional offline revenue with Adobe CX Enterprise H1*H2*H3 $7,000,000 $14,000,000 $17,500,000
H5 Attribution to Adobe CX Enterprise TEI methodology 33% 33% 33%
H6 Profit margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
Ht Profit from additional offline conversions H4*H5*H6 $231,000 $462,000 $577,500
  Risk adjustment ↓20%      
Htr Profit from additional offline conversions (risk-adjusted)   $184,800 $369,600 $462,000
Three-year total: $1,016,400 Three-year present value: $820,562

Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were unable to quantify:

  • Shared ecosystem of CXO solutions. The interconnection of Adobe CX Enterprise solutions let users scale out their CXO approach without adopting third-party solutions that might require their own custom integrations and management. Users could collaborate and share assets without having to convert them to file formats that fit the solution; access to customer information was also enhanced with data sitting in one centralized platform. Integrations with platforms like Adobe Commerce also meant that personalization changes to customers’ digital storefront experience could be automated with ease. Interviewees leveraged around 10 of the applications that are part of Adobe CX Enterprise, taking on more as they gained maturity with each application.

  • Enhanced day-to-day employee experience. Interviewees commented on the ease of use of Adobe CX Enterprise being a win for employees, which helped increase self-service in building customer experiences. Employees did not have to wait as often as in the past for developers and designers to support them. The IT director at a manufacturing organization said: “In terms of features and functionality for our content authors, the user interface usability drove a lot of our decision [to invest in Adobe]. We could build stuff and reuse it multiple times without having to redo content again. That was a big driver for us.” The demand generation lead at a manufacturing organization also appreciated how Adobe Workfront helps colleagues to keep track of their colleagues’ bandwidth and amount of work coming through so they are more informed about who is busy and who is available to provide support. The interviewee said. “Workfront touches many people. It allows us to capture tasks and people assigned to them, so everything is tracked. It’s very insightful for me and other leaders to to know what’s going on with the team.”

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Adobe CX Enterprise and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Agentic AI-powered operations. Adobe CX Enterprise offers agentic AI to automate tasks within all of its applications, helping to accelerate operations and scale customer experiences. Among survey respondents, 26% cited platform agents as helping to enable efficiency with their organization’s end-to-end timeline for content production. Another 34% cited Adobe Acrobat AI Assistant, about which 43% agreed it made them significantly faster in their time to map out and orchestrate each project. AI Assistant’s ability to summarize documents and provide traceable citations accelerated users’ ability to find information in documents.

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite

Total Costs

Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Itr Adobe software costs $0 $2,530,000 $2,530,000 $2,530,000 $7,590,000 $6,291,736
Jtr Ongoing professional and managed services costs $770,000 $770,000 $770,000 $770,000 $3,080,000 $2,684,876
Ktr Premium cost of new hires $0 $70,980 $141,960 $212,940 $425,880 $341,835
Ltr Training costs $0 $327,600 $491,400 $655,200 $1,474,200 $1,196,195
  Total costs
(risk-adjusted)
$770,000 $3,698,580 $3,933,360 $4,168,140 $12,570,080 $10,514,642

Adobe Software Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents paid for Adobe CX Enterprise based on the scale of operations with its applications and number of employees using them. The exact amount each organization paid for Adobe CX Enterprise varied.

Modeling and assumptions. Assumed costs for the composite organization are based on the following:

  • The scale of deployment of Adobe CX Enterprise across the organization, including the number of employees who are active users.

  • The number of active customers in the database and channels through which the composite organization runs campaigns that generate data.

Results. To account for risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6.3 million.

Adobe Software Costs

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
I1 Adobe software costs Interviews 0  $2,300,000 $2,300,000 $2,300,000
It Adobe software costs I1 $0 $2,300,000 $2,300,000 $2,300,000
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Itr Adobe software costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $2,530,000 $2,530,000 $2,530,000
Three-year total: $7,590,000 Three-year present value: $6,291,736

Ongoing Professional And Managed Services Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees noted their use of Adobe’s Professional Services, its Ultimate Success program, or an Adobe partner to support implementation and ongoing success with Adobe CX Enterprise applications at their organization. Pilot programs and proofs of concept took several months to complete and required bandwidth from internal resources across customer experience operations.

Modeling and assumptions. Assumed costs for the composite organization are based on the following:

  • The organization pays for assistance with initial deployment of Adobe CX Enterprise and continued support for leveraging its applications.

  • The total costs are an average that is proportional to the annual software costs at the organization.

Results. To account for risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.7 million.

Ongoing Professional And Managed Services Costs

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
J1 Ongoing professional and managed services costs Interviews $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000
Jt Ongoing professional and managed services costs J1 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Jtr Ongoing professional and managed services costs (risk-adjusted)   $770,000 $770,000 $770,000 $770,000
Three-year total: $3,080,000 Three-year present value: $2,684,876

Premium Cost Of New Hires

Evidence and data. To help their organization get the most out of their investment in Adobe CX Enterprise, interviewees hired employees with a background in leveraging its applications. These new hires helped to train employees on the applications and shared best practices based on past experiences. Interviewee’s teams spent a small premium to acquire these internal solution experts.

Modeling and assumptions. Assumed costs for the composite organization are based on the following:

  • The composite spends 10% more for employees with expertise in Adobe applications part of Adobe CX Enterprise.

  • The number of employees hired each year grows proportionally with expanded usage of Adobe CX Enterprise across the organization.

  • The fully burdened annual salary for each of these employees is $135,200.

Results. To account for risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $342,000.

Premium Cost Of New Hires

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
K1 Employees hired annually where Adobe CX Enterprise is required Composite   5 10 15
K2 Average blended fully burdened annual salary of employees A10*2,080 annual working hours   $135,200 $135,200 $135,200
K3 Additional cost of employees with Adobe solution expertise Interviews   10% 10% 10%
Kt Premium cost of new hires K1*K2*K3   $67,600 $135,200 $202,800
  Risk adjustment ↑5%        
Ktr Premium cost of new hires (risk-adjusted)     $70,980 $141,960 $212,940
Three-year total: $425,880 Three-year present value: $341,835

Training Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees shared that their organizations had two types of Adobe CX Enterprise users: power users who incorporate its solutions into daily workflows and self-service users who occasionally access one solution part of CX Enterprise on a weekly, monthly, or infrequent basis.

Time spent on training for individual power users took upward of the equivalent of a week for them to learn the best practices and how to effectively take advantage of application capabilities. Self-service users spent a few hours, or the equivalent of a couple of days, learning functionality that could help them.

Modeling and assumptions. Assumed costs for the composite organization are based on the following:

  • In Year 1, the composite organization has 100 power users who learn how to effectively use Adobe CX Enterprise applications over the course of one work week. It is assumed that the number of power users grows to 150 in Year 2 and 200 in Year 3 as they participate in perpetual training and learning.

  • Each year, existing power users take time to learn about newly added Adobe CX Enterprise features to further enhance their operations.

  • In Year 1, the composite organization has 50 self-services users who occasionally leverage Adobe CX Enterprise applications. This number grows by 75 in Year 2 and 100 in Year 3, totaling 225 self-service infrequent users of Adobe CX Enterprise.

  • New self-service users spend the equivalent of two days over the course of a year familiarizing themselves with functions they need to learn.

Results. To account for risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.2 million

Training Costs

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
L1 Annual Adobe power users Composite 0  100 150 200
L2 Training hours per year for power users Interviews 0 40 40 40
L3 Self-service users added annually Composite 0 50 75 100
L4 Training hours per year for self-service users Interviews 0 16 16 16
L5 Average blended fully burdened hourly rate for employees Composite $0 $65 $65 $65
Lt Training costs (L1*L2*L5)+(L3*L4*L5) $0 $312,000 $468,000 $624,000
  Risk adjustment ↑5%        
Ltr Training costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $327,600 $491,400 $655,200
Three-year total: $1,474,200 Three-year present value: $1,196,195

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)

  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($770,000) ($3,698,580) ($3,933,360) ($4,168,140) ($12,570,080) ($10,514,642)
Total benefits $0 $12,985,031 $18,243,201 $23,464,652 $54,692,884 $44,510,939
Net benefits ($770,000) $9,286,451 $14,309,841 $19,296,512 $42,122,804 $33,996,297
ROI           323%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in CX Enterprise.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that CX Enterprise can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Adobe stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to CX Enterprise.

Interviews And Survey

Interviewed four decision-makers at five organizations and surveyed 213 respondents at organizations using CX Enterprise to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach

Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology

Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Survey Demographics

[CONTENT]

 ROLE  
Manager 35%
Director 31%
Vice president 24%
C-level executive 10%

[CONTENT]

 INDUSTRY  
Retail 8%
Telecom 8%
Manufacturing/consumer packaged goods (CPG) 7%
IT/tech services 6%
Manufacturing/production of high-tech products 6%
Advertising/marketing 5%

[CONTENT]

Company Size  
500 to 999 employees 11%
1,000 to 2,499 employees 14%
2,500 to 4,999 employees 20%
5,000 to 9,999 employees 19%
10,000+ employees 35%

[CONTENT]

Company Region  
North America 50%
EMEA 35%
APAC 15%

Appendix C

Supplemental Material

Related Forrester Research

CX Strategy Essentials, Forrester Research, Inc., January 16, 2026

Your CX Vision: How To Create A Customer Experience Vision To Guide Transformation, Forrester Research, Inc., January 16, 2026

Appendix D

Endnotes

1Source: The Rise Of Intelligent Content Will Redefine Relevancy, Forrester Research, Inc., February 3, 2026.

2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Adobe and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in CX Enterprise. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with CX Enterprise based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Adobe or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Adobe and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Adobe make no warranties of any kind.

Adobe reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Adobe provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third-party survey partner.

Consulting Team:

Corey McNair

Published

September 2026

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Adobe CX Enterprise