Executive Summary
Content demand increases and collaboration challenges are major obstacles for small to medium-size businesses (SMBs) today. Adobe Creative Cloud for teams can help SMBs overcome these hurdles and streamline creative processes through an integrated suite of creative solutions that incorporates genAI capabilities and comprehensive administrative features.
Adobe Creative Cloud for teams is designed for SMBs that need creative tools across multiple users. It bundles more than 20 applications, including Photoshop, Illustrator, and Acrobat Pro, along with integrated genAI, collaboration tools, and exclusive business features.
Adobe commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) SMBs may realize by deploying Creative Cloud.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Creative Cloud on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers and surveyed 115 individuals (e.g., directors, managers, product owners, and users) at SMBs in North America and EMEA with experience using Adobe Creative Cloud’s capabilities and services.2 For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents into a single composite organization, which is a global, industry-agnostic organization with upwards of 200 employees and up to eight licenses for Adobe Creative Cloud for teams. The results of the study are applicable to organizations that have between two and 500 employees, and the included dynamic calculator tool can generate results based on your organization’s size.
Prior to having at least an Adobe Creative Cloud for teams license, interviewees leveraged several Adobe Creative Cloud applications and multiple third-party creative tools for content, including several genAI models to streamline production. Interviewees were concerned with their lack of oversight into the tools employees leveraged, especially genAI models, and control over the output. They felt establishing consistency in tools could encourage collaboration, yield higher-quality creative results, and provide greater oversight into employee access and tool usage — ultimately helping inform solution budgeting decisions for the team.
After investing in Creative Cloud for teams, interviewees centralized creative operations around Adobe and recognized cost savings as they reduced their third-party creative solution licenses. This change also reduced admin’s time required to oversee solution licensing and integration. Adobe Creative Cloud for teams’ commercially safe genAI tools, like Generative Fill and Expand in Photoshop for image editing, accelerated production cycles. Given Adobe’s training of genAI on Adobe Stock and content with permissions, users focused on leveraging genAI models with Firefly, which helped standardize their approach to their generated images and increased overall delivery output to meet content demands.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
-
Increase content productivity by 20%. Creatives accelerate content productivity with the Adobe Creative Cloud solution’s genAI features. Specifically, using Photoshop’s Generative Expand and Fill capabilities to add neutral space and remove objects helps transform images that would otherwise be unusable or require additional editing. In addition, Firefly genAI automates the creation of images that are commercially safe for use.
-
Accelerate content reviews and revisions by 40%. With the composite organization moving its entire creative team to Adobe Creative Cloud for teams, colleagues no longer have to reformat files for non-Adobe creative solutions, enabling faster content review and edits. In addition, capabilities like Illustrators’ Image Trace on vectors reduces cleanup time on logo creation and After Effects adds extra polish to the finished content.
-
Generate additional revenue of 25% from faster time to market. Enhanced productivity helps the composite organization go to market faster and refresh content more regularly, all while maintaining high-quality output, providing more opportunity for marketing campaigns to generate revenue.
-
Gain cost efficiencies totaling thousands of dollars across creative projects. The composite organization reduces costs by consolidating creative workflows into Adobe Creative Cloud for teams; retiring or scaling back non-Adobe creative solutions; and saving on licensing, IT management, professional services, and stock image costs.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
-
Secure creative asset management with Creative Cloud. A key security feature of Adobe Creative Cloud for teams includes data encryption of saved files. Centralizing operations on Adobe Creative Cloud also mitigates exposure of files shared across third-party creative solutions, protecting them within the Adobe Creative Cloud ecosystem.
-
Commercially safe use of genAI and access to partner models through Adobe Firefly. Users trust Adobe’s approach to genAI with Firefly because its models are trained only on Adobe Stock and content with permissions for use. Adobe Firefly also grants access to best-in-class partner genAI models without an additional cost.
-
Streamlined Creative Cloud licensing management. By going from an à la carte approach to Adobe Creative Cloud applications, then adopting these apps with Creative Cloud for teams, admins simplified how they grant employees access to apps and have conversations about licensing.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
-
Adobe Creative Cloud for teams license costs. The composite organization pays for a license for each user of Adobe Creative Cloud for teams.
-
Internal oversight costs for Adobe Creative Cloud for teams. Users with new licenses spend most of their time training on Firefly genAI use cases and developing best practices for using genAI models. Admins spend a small amount of time provisioning licenses, reviewing employee usage, and deploying any software updates.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $356,00 over three years versus costs of $87,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $270,000 and an ROI of 311%.
Key Statistics
311%
Return on investment (ROI)
$356,000
Benefits PV
$270,000
Net present value (NPV)
Benefits (Three-Year)
The Adobe Creative Cloud Customer Journey
Drivers leading to the Creative Cloud investment
Interviews
| Role | Industry | Region | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Director of media and interactive | Events | North America | 150+ |
| CEO | Brand and marketing agency | North America | 20+ |
| Managing director, senior program manager | Agency | EMEA | 20+ |
| Creative director | CPG | North America | 50+ |
| Head of creative | Agency | EMEA | 50 |
Key Challenges
Interviewees and survey respondents shared that while they used individual Adobe Creative Cloud applications, they faced several challenges with their à la carte approach that included third-party creative solutions:
-
Higher costs and expectations to deliver more content. Sixty-five percent of survey respondents said higher content demand was a key pain point before they increased their Adobe Creative Cloud investment. Interviewees echoed this sentiment, citing the increasing pressure to produce fresh, relevant content; however, nonintegrated toolsets and lack of collaboration made it difficult for their creatives to do so effectively.
-
Decentralized creative processes that led to poor collaboration. Creative operations at interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations were spread out across Adobe Creative Cloud applications and third-party solutions. This approach made it difficult for employees to collaborate on files without reformatting or converting them for solutions other people were using, which slowed down overall production. The head of creative at an agency said: “Senior management would often get frustrated at the speed with which our marketing manager and I were able to work together. One of us would spot something that needed changing, and if one of us wasn’t there, we’d have to log into the other person’s machine to make the change.”
Key Creative Pain Points
Base: 115 creative decision-makers in North America and EMEA
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Adobe, February 2026
-
Costs and time spent on managing and maintaining creative solutions. Interviewees’ IT teams regularly received requests to help with file sharing issues between solutions. Either files needed to be reformatted, or there were errors with importing that required maintenance for integrations.
-
Concerns with the safety of genAI technology for creative. Interviewees’ creative teams had started to leverage genAI tools for creating images but they were concerned about the risks of intellectual property (IP) being incorporated into model training, IP infringement, and brand reputation impact. Alongside those risks, the bandwidth required to learn how to use genAI effectively was too significant for teams given their high content creation demands.
Solution Goals
Several features of Adobe Creative Cloud for teams convinced interviewees and survey respondents to make the investment, including:
-
Integrated solutions that support the end-to-end content production cycle.
-
Creative genAI capabilities that accelerate productivity while protecting IP.
-
Admin controls to oversee user licensing and solution access.
Key Benefits Experienced With Adobe Creative Cloud
Base: 115 creative decision-makers in North America and EMEA
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Adobe, February 2026
Composite Organization
Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
-
Description of composite. The composite organization is a global, industry-agnostic company with multiple business services. There are upwards of 200 employees, including contractors, 4% of whom are involved with creative operations. Before Adobe Creative Cloud for teams, team members either did not use Adobe Creative Cloud, had access to single apps (e.g., Photoshop, Illustrator), or were on the individual all-apps plan that did not have team admin features. Alongside Adobe, creatives and designers regularly leveraged third-party creative apps.
-
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization deploys Adobe Creative Cloud for teams to eight employees involved in creative. Over a few weeks, they migrate non-Adobe creative projects, assets, and templates to Adobe Creative Cloud. Within the first year, creatives pilot use cases with Firefly genAI and train models on their materials, building maturity with the solution over the three-year analysis period.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
-
Upwards of 200 employees
-
Eight employees involved in creative operations
-
Building maturity with genAI use cases
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Increased content creation productivity | $40,392 | $60,588 | $80,784 | $181,764 | $147,487 |
| Btr | Accelerated content reviews and revisions | $30,294 | $35,343 | $40,392 | $106,029 | $87,096 |
| Ctr | Revenue growth driven by content production gains | $24,000 | $32,000 | $40,000 | $96,000 | $78,317 |
| Dtr | Cost efficiencies with Adobe Creative Cloud for teams | $17,510 | $17,510 | $17,510 | $52,530 | $43,545 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $112,196 | $145,441 | $178,686 | $436,323 | $356,445 |
Increased Content Creation Productivity
Evidence and data. Among surveyed SMB users of Adobe Creative Cloud, 74% identified increased creative productivity as a result of using the solutions. A key contributor to this productivity was Adobe’s genAI capabilities: 30% of respondents who use those features cited it as a significant contributor to productivity, and another 58% said it was a moderate contributor.
74%
Increased creative productivity from Adobe Creative Cloud capabilities and services
Each interviewee identified Photoshop’s Generative Expand and Fill capabilities as most critical to significantly accelerating creative productivity. The creative director at a CPG company said: “The majority of time I’m using Creative Cloud is for its Generative Fill workflow. I may have an outdoor photo and need a little more room in the picture, and I need to get rid of the sun. Instead of doing some sort of clone stamping, like I would have done in the past, I have Generative Fill get rid of that. If I need to add a chair, I can have Fill insert that.” They added that using this feature reduced the time spent on work like this from 45 minutes to 5 minutes.
Beyond Generative Expand and Fill, the CEO at a brand and marketing agency cited creating vectors using Image Trace in Illustrator as a factor in helping increase deliverable output by 40% per month. The interviewee shared: “We do a lot of vector tracing every day with Illustrator. One thing I thought was cool was our designer was making something with watercolors — it’s so imperfect you wouldn’t think it was possible to turn into vectors. It would have taken 10 to hundreds of hours, and we used Illustrator to solve that.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
The creative team oversees 60 creative projects per year (i.e., five per month).
-
Five FTEs allocate 40 hours of support to each project. Within that time, they dedicate 80% to planning, ideation, and creative for projects.
-
Adobe Creative Cloud for teams increases user productivity by 10% in Year 1 as creatives incorporate the solution’s genAI capabilities into their daily workflows. As creatives build maturity with genAI and incorporate it into more projects, their productivity increases to 15% in Year 2 and 20% in Year 3.
-
The fully burdened hourly rate for creatives, including employees and contractors, is $75.
-
Of the time saved, 66% is reallocated toward productive work, including creating more deliverables or improving content quality. The remaining time is spent on longer work breaks or fewer late nights, creating a better employee experience.
Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact the benefits include:
-
The number of projects a company oversees annually, the number of creatives working on each project, and amount of time spent on each project.
-
Use cases for Adobe Creative Cloud for teams and time savings from capabilities used.
-
The hourly rate for employees supporting creative projects.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $147,000.
Increased Content Creation Productivity
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Average creative projects | Composite | 60 | 60 | 60 | |
| A2 | Average creative FTEs working on each project | Survey | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| A3 | Time spent on each project per FTE (hours) | Survey | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| A4 | Total time spent on each project (hours) | A2*A3 | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
| A5 | Percentage of time allocated to planning, ideation, and creative | Survey | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| A6 | Time spent on planning, ideation, and creative (hours) | A1*A4*A5 | 9,600 | 9,600 | 9,600 | |
| A7 | Increased creative productivity with Adobe Creative Cloud | Interviews/survey | 10% | 15% | 20% | |
| A8 | Subtotal: Productivity with Adobe Creative Cloud (hours) | A6*A7 | 960 | 1,440 | 1,920 | |
| A9 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for creatives working on projects | Composite | $75 | $75 | $75 | |
| A10 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 66% | 66% | 66% | |
| At | Increased content creation productivity | A8*A9*A10 | $47,520 | $71,280 | $95,040 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Atr | Increased content creation productivity (risk-adjusted) | $40,392 | $60,588 | $80,784 | ||
| Three-year total: $181,764 | Three-year present value: $147,487 | |||||
Accelerated Content Reviews And Revisions
Evidence and data. Fifty-five percent of survey respondents saw a productivity improvement in content reviews and approvals, and time spent on these activities decreased by a median of 40%. Adobe Creative Cloud for teams’ capabilities were a key factor in accelerating reviews for users and stakeholders signing off on visuals.
The CEO of a brand and marketing agency cited Illustrator’s vector tool as reducing cleanup time by 30% for logo creation, while Photoshop helped them to make “really good” mock-ups that accelerated overall approval time by 50%. They noted After Effects also helped add a “wow factor” with custom animations. The interviewee said, “We’re able to reapply time savings to quality improvements, where we spend more time fully understanding the story of our clients and improving the quality of the content so they’re more satisfied with what we deliver.”
57%
Respondents who agree that using Adobe Creative Cloud improved collaboration
Enhanced collaboration also improved the review process, with 57% of survey respondents agreeing it was a key result of using Adobe Creative Cloud. As interviewees’ entire creative teams gained access to Adobe Creative Cloud for teams, it became easier for individuals to hop onto colleagues’ projects, review materials they created, and lend support without waiting for access. Sharing files and assets no longer required reformatting since everyone was using the same Adobe Creative Cloud apps.
The head of creative at an agency spoke to improved teamwork: “We mostly use Creative Cloud for collaborative projects. If I need to set something up or review work, it’s much easier to do so with a live file than an export. Especially with Premiere Pro, there are source files for it that need to be worked on together with that.”
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
On each creative project, employees allocate approximately 20% of their time to content reviews, edits, and approvals.
-
Adobe Creative Cloud for teams accelerates time spent on reviews, edits, and approvals by 30% in Year 1 through enhanced collaboration and tools to improve content quality. This increases to 35% in Year 2 and 40% in Year 3.
Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact the benefits include:
-
The number of creatives and their time spent on content reviews, edits, and approvals before adopting Adobe Creative Cloud for teams.
-
Creative and collaboration tools previously used to complete this work.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $87,000.
Accelerated Content Reviews And Revisions
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Average creative projects | Composite | 60 | 60 | 60 | |
| B2 | Average creative FTEs working on each project | Survey | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| B3 | Time spent on each project (hours) | Survey | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| B4 | Percentage of time allocated to content reviews, edits, and approvals | Survey | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| B5 | Time spent on content reviews, edits, and approvals (hours) | B1*B2*B3*B4 | 2,400 | 2,400 | 2,400 | |
| B6 | Increased productivity for reviews, edits, and approvals with Adobe Creative Cloud | Interviews/survey | 30% | 35% | 40% | |
| B7 | Subtotal: Productivity on reviews, edits, and approvals with Adobe Creative Cloud (hours) | B5*B6 | 720 | 840 | 960 | |
| B8 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for creatives working on projects | Composite | $75 | $75 | $75 | |
| B9 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI methodology | 66% | 66% | 66% | |
| Bt | Accelerated content reviews and revisions | B7*B8*B9 | $35,640 | $41,580 | $47,520 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Btr | Accelerated content reviews and revisions (risk-adjusted) | $30,294 | $35,343 | $40,392 | ||
| Three-year total: $106,029 | Three-year present value: $87,096 | |||||
Revenue Growth Driven By Content Production Gains
Evidence and data. By completing work on projects faster, interviewees said they were able to expand their project pipelines. The events organization increased the number of annual events it supports by more than 40%. Meanwhile, the CEO at a brand and marketing agency said their business nearly doubled over one year as the timeline for projects decreased from seven weeks to four weeks. The high quality of the work produced with Adobe Creative Cloud for teams also helped attract more business.
25%
Accelerated time to market for marketing campaigns
Forty-five percent of survey respondents cited increased revenue as an outcome of using Adobe Creative Cloud. In terms of impact, 71% saw at least a 5% increase in revenue. Growth in reach contributed to this improvement, with 25% of respondents seeing more than a 20% gain in this area. Creatives’ faster content creation speeds with Creative Cloud applications allowed marketers to refresh campaign content more frequently to reach and engage more audiences.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
One-third of creative projects worked on annually are related to marketing campaigns.
-
Creatives can get creative content to market 15% faster in Year 1 due to Adobe Creative Cloud for teams. As the organization becomes more aligned with the platforms and matures with its genAI features, its speed to market increases to 25% in Year 3.
-
The average incremental revenue that can be directly tied to a marketing campaign is $100,000. This value represents roughly five times the investment in the campaign for the organization.
-
An operating profit margin of 10% is applied to account for all operating costs.
Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact the benefits include:
-
The number of marketing campaigns an organization produces.
-
The average revenue of each marketing campaign.
-
The operating profit margin on revenue.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $78,000.
Revenue Growth Driven By Content Production Gains
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Marketing campaigns | Composite | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| C2 | Accelerated time to market for marketing campaigns | Survey | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
| C3 | Average incremental revenue directly attributed to each campaign | Composite | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| C4 | Additional revenue per campaign from faster time to market | C2*C3 | $15,000 | $20,000 | $25,000 | |
| C5 | Subtotal: Additional revenue per campaign from faster time to market | C1*C4 | $300,000 | $400,000 | $500,000 | |
| C6 | Operating profit margin | TEI methodology | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
| Ct | Revenue growth driven by content production gains | C5*C6 | $30,000 | $40,000 | $50,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Ctr | Revenue growth driven by content production gains (risk-adjusted) | $24,000 | $32,000 | $40,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $96,000 | Three-year present value: $78,317 | |||||
Cost Efficiencies With Adobe Creative Cloud For Teams
Evidence and data. Multiple interviewees either retired non-Adobe creative solutions or scaled down their usage to consolidate creative workflows through Adobe Creative Cloud for teams. The head of creative at an agency said: “We had a third-party solution for video editing, where it was specifically used for that. Now being able to use Premiere Pro as part of Creative Cloud takes care of that. We’ve downgraded our license just to have it for sharing assets with clients using it.”
Among survey respondents, 38% cited Adobe Creative Cloud as increasing cost savings. In terms of legacy creative solutions, their organizations saved an average of $17,500 on subscriptions and $14,000 on ongoing IT management costs per year.
Respondents’ organizations also saw cost savings from third-party professional services, averaging $19,500, and from stock image purchases, averaging $13,500 per year. Seventy-three percent of respondents attributed genAI as a factor in 6% to 15% of these cost savings. Between Firefly’s genAI models and Adobe Stock images, users had an abundance of visual content to incorporate in their creative work.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Each creative FTE uses one to three additional creative tools, and the cost per license for access is $300.
-
Each year, 200 hours is spent on third-party creative tools to manage integrations, apply updates, conduct maintenance, and provision licenses.
-
The blended fully burdened hourly rate for creative directors and IT overseeing licensing and integrations is $85.
-
One-fifth of creative projects involve third-party support, including freelance or external support, or stock images, averaging $100 per project.
Risks. Differences across organizations that may impact the benefits include:
-
The number of non-Adobe creative solutions an organization uses before Adobe Creative Cloud for teams and time spent maintaining them.
-
Use of third-party services or stock images on creative projects and the associated costs.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $44,000.
Cost Efficiencies With Adobe Creative Cloud For Teams
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Creative FTEs | Composite | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| D2 | Average cost of licenses for third-party creative solutions per FTE | Survey | $300 | $300 | $300 | |
| D3 | Subtotal: Avoided costs with third-party creative solutions | D1*D2 | $2,400 | $2,400 | $2,400 | |
| D4 | Annual time spent managing integrations, maintenance, and license distribution (hours) | Survey | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
| D5 | Blended fully burdened hourly rate for creative director and IT FTEs overseeing licenses and integrations | Composite | $85 | $85 | $85 | |
| D6 | Subtotal: Avoided costs of integration management, maintenance, and license distribution | D4*D5 | $17,000 | $17,000 | $17,000 | |
| D7 | Average creative projects | Composite | 60 | 60 | 60 | |
| D8 | Percentage of creative projects with third-party costs (e.g., stock images, freelance/external support) | Composite | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| D9 | Average costs for creative projects requiring third-party support | Survey | $100 | $100 | $100 | |
| D10 | Subtotal: Avoided third-party costs | D7*D8*D9 | $1,200 | $1,200 | $1,200 | |
| Dt | Cost efficiencies with Adobe Creative Cloud for teams | D3+D6+D10 | $20,600 | $20,600 | $20,600 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Dtr | Cost efficiencies with Adobe Creative Cloud for teams (risk-adjusted) | $17,510 | $17,510 | $17,510 | ||
| Three-year total: $52,530 | Three-year present value: $43,545 | |||||
Unquantified Benefits
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
-
Commercially safe genAI use and access to partner models through Adobe Firefly. Interviewees felt secure with Adobe’s approach to genAI, its training models only on Adobe Stock, and content with permissions for use. In addition, interviewees took advantage of Adobe’s open ecosystem for access to leading genAI models from best-in-class partners. With Adobe Firefly, they noted not having to pay a subscription for each genAI tool and could use the models directly in the Firefly app. The director of media and interactive at an events company said: “We’ve not had a moment of regret moving into [genAI] with Adobe Creative Cloud. … I will leverage all of the available partner models in Firefly because we want everyone on the team to see what’s out there.”
-
Secure creative asset management with Creative Cloud. More than half (51%) of surveyed Adobe Creative Cloud users felt the solution improved asset security, and 69% of these respondents selected identity and access management as contributing to improved security. Data encryption (64%) was the second leading factor for improved security. Moving operations primarily to Adobe Creative Cloud helped protect files and mitigate their transfer between creative solutions where they could be exposed to third parties.
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Adobe Creative Cloud for teams and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
-
Streamlined management of Adobe Creative Cloud licensing. Organizations moving from an à la carte approach with Adobe Creative Cloud applications licensing to adopting all applications with Adobe Creative Cloud for teams were able to simplify admin licensing conversations. Instead of negotiating access for each Adobe Creative Cloud application, admins only had to discuss their overall usage and licensing plans for Adobe Creative Cloud Pro for teams, which saved them time on negotiations and calculating cumulative costs for the applications. According to survey respondents, admin costs decreased by an average of $10,000 per year.
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtr | Adobe Creative Cloud for teams license costs | $0 | $10,080 | $10,080 | $10,080 | $30,240 | $25,067 |
| Etr | Internal oversight costs for Adobe Creative Cloud for teams | $0 | $32,760 | $20,160 | $20,160 | $73,080 | $61,589 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) |
$0 | $42,840 | $30,240 | $30,240 | $103,320 | $86,656 |
Adobe Creative Cloud For Teams License Costs
Evidence and data. Interviewees said they paid for Adobe Creative Cloud for teams on a monthly per user basis. The number of users were typically in the single to low double-digit range.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
There are eight Adobe Creative Cloud for teams users at the organization.
-
The monthly cost for a license is $100 per user.
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences, and the cost will vary between organizations depending on the number of licenses they sign up for and any future pricing changes.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $25,000.
Adobe Creative Cloud For Teams License Costs
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Adobe Creative Cloud for teams licenses | Composite | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| E2 | Monthly cost of a license for access to Creative Cloud for teams | Interviews | $100 | $100 | $100 | |
| Et | Adobe Creative Cloud for teams license costs | E1*E2*12 months | $0 | $9,600 | $9,600 | $9,600 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Etr | Adobe Creative Cloud for teams license costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $10,080 | $10,080 | $10,080 | |
| Three-year total: $30,240 | Three-year present value: $25,067 | |||||
Internal Oversight Costs For Adobe Creative Cloud For Teams
Evidence and data. Interviewees’ creative teams spent a short time familiarizing themselves with Adobe Creative Cloud for teams. They acknowledged that most hires were already familiar with Adobe Creative Cloud, so most training time was tied to new Adobe Firefly genAI use cases and developing best practices for using genAI models.
Modeling and assumptions. For the composite organization, Forrester assumes the following:
-
Each new user of Creative Cloud for teams spends 40 hours familiarizing themselves with features and capabilities they hadn’t previously leveraged, including genAI tools, and developing best practices for them. After Year 1, four new users undergo training each year to account for turnover and new hires.
-
One admin is responsible for provisioning licenses, reviewing usage among employees, and deploying any software updates.
Risks. Results may not be representative of all experiences, and the cost may vary between organizations depending on the following factors:
-
The number of Adobe Creative Cloud for teams users at an organization.
-
Familiarity with and level of adoption of genAI tools.
-
The level of admin support required to oversee Adobe Creative Cloud for teams.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $62,000.
Internal Oversight Costs For Adobe Creative Cloud For Teams
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Creative Cloud for teams users | Composite | 8 | 4 | 4 | |
| F2 | Time spent learning genAI tools and developing best practices (hours) | Interviews | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| F3 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for creatives working on projects | Composite | $75 | $75 | $75 | |
| F4 | Training costs | F1*F2*F3 | $24,000 | $12,000 | $12,000 | |
| F5 | Creative Cloud for teams admin | Interviews | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| F6 | Time spent per month overseeing admin of solution (hours) | Composite | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| F7 | Admin costs | F3*F5*F6*12 months | $7,200 | $7,200 | $7,200 | |
| Ft | Internal oversight costs for Adobe Creative Cloud for teams | F4+F7 | $0 | $31,200 | $19,200 | $19,200 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Ftr | Internal oversight costs for Adobe Creative Cloud for teams (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $32,760 | $20,160 | $20,160 | |
| Three-year total: $73,080 | Three-year present value: $61,589 | |||||
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($42,840) | ($30,240) | ($30,240) | ($103,320) | ($86,656) | |
| Total benefits | $112,196 | $145,441 | $178,686 | $436,323 | $356,445 | |
| Net benefits | $69,356 | $115,201 | $148,446 | $333,003 | $269,789 | |
| ROI | 311% |
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Creative Cloud.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Creative Cloud can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed Adobe stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Creative Cloud.
Interviews And Survey
Interviewed five decision-makers and surveyed 115 respondents at organizations using Adobe Creative Cloud to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Composite Organization
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Survey Demographics
[CONTENT]
| ANNUAL REVENUE | |
|---|---|
| Less than $5M | 5% |
| $5M to less than $50M | 23% |
| $50M to less than $250M | 23% |
| $250M to less than $500M | 49% |
[CONTENT]
| ROLE | |
|---|---|
| Director | 33% |
| Manager | 30% |
| Visual design | 17% |
| VP of organization | 10% |
| Product owner | 10% |
[CONTENT]
| Region | |
|---|---|
| United States | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 23% |
| Canada | 17% |
| Germany | 10% |
| France | 10% |
[CONTENT]
| INDUSTRY | |
|---|---|
| Advertising/marketing | 15% |
| Events | 13% |
| Marketing agency | 13% |
| Retail | 12% |
| Media and entertainment | 10% |
| Business or professional services | 6% |
| Financial services | 5% |
| Other | 24% |
Appendix C
Supplemental Material
Related Forrester Research
The Future Of Generative AI For Visual Content, Forrester Research, Inc., September 26, 2025.
To Survive The Content Apocalypse, Reinvent Your Content Operating Model Now, Forrester Research, Inc., January 29, 2026.
Appendix D
Endnotes
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
2 Survey respondents at SMB organizations identified their current Adobe Creative Cloud service plan as either Creative Cloud Pro for teams, Creative Cloud Pro Plus for teams, or Creative Cloud for enterprise.
3 Interviewee had access to unlimited usage of Adobe Stock images in Adobe Creative Cloud Pro Plus for teams.
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Adobe and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Creative Cloud. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Creative Cloud based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Adobe or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Adobe and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Adobe make no warranties of any kind.
Adobe reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Adobe provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Corey McNair
Published
June 2026