Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Salesforce Professional Services
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Salesforce, FEBRUary 2026
|
Total Economic Impact The Total Economic Impact™ Of Salesforce Professional ServicesA FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Salesforce, FEBRUary 2026 Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Salesforce Professional Services
Executive SummaryCRM is a strategic technology that underpins customer experience and employee engagement, and the growth of AI continues to supercharge its value. To fully realize CRM’s potential, organizations must prioritize platform agility and minimize technical debt, enabling them to respond to business pressures faster and consume new innovation. Salesforce Professional Services helps organizations get the most out of their Salesforce investments, accelerating time to value, reimagining business models and processes, and creating a flexible foundation for innovation and transformational change.1 Salesforce Professional Services is a consultancy service offered by Salesforce to help organizations get started, build, optimize, and transform with Salesforce more effectively. Engagements include roadmap development, solution configuration and build, and ongoing performance optimization. The work focuses on aligning Salesforce to business requirements, accelerating time to value, and establishing the technical and operational foundation needed to scale. Salesforce Professional Services works directly with customer teams and, when applicable, in coordination with consulting partners to support adoption and ongoing use of the platform. Salesforce commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Salesforce Professional Services.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Salesforce Professional Services on their organizations. To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed five decision-makers and surveyed 216 respondents with experience using Salesforce Professional Services. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a multibillion-dollar company with 7,500 Salesforce users. Prior to engaging with Salesforce Professional Services, the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations were either new to the Salesforce platform or had one or more existing Salesforce deployments that were delivering suboptimal value. As a result of working with Salesforce Professional Services, these organizations reached project outcomes faster, accelerated time to business value, created flexible platform foundations, and were better prepared to self-sufficiently manage and innovate on their platforms. These benefits enabled organizations to realize value from their Salesforce investments that may not have been achievable otherwise. Which of the following benefits has your organization realized as a result of its investment in Salesforce Professional Services?[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Built a more flexible platform foundation
Accelerated time to value for the business/platform
Reduced the effort required to manage and support the platform
Enabled our organization to realize more value from the overall Salesforce investment
Reached desired project outcomes faster
Enabled stronger data governance
Base: 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM Key FindingsQuantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
68% of survey respondents indicated that Salesforce Professional Services has positioned their organizations to adopt Salesforce AI capabilities, such as Agentforce, more quickly.3
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $8.2 million over three years versus costs of $2.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $6.0 million and an ROI of 272%. 90% of survey respondents believe that the benefits of Salesforce Professional Services outweigh the costs.4You noted that Salesforce Professional Services positioned your organization to adopt Salesforce AI capabilities (e.g., Agentforce) more quickly in the future. In what ways did it support your organization's readiness?[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Salesforce Professional Services optimized our data architecture for Salesforce AI capabilities
We received guidance on where and how Salesforce AI could add value
We received support in developing a roadmap for AI adoption
Salesforce Professional Services helped establish data governance standards
Base: 146 IT and business decision-makers responsible for CRM who indicated that their organizations were positioned to more quickly adopt Salesforce AI capabilities due to Salesforce Professional Services Key Statistics272%Return on investment (ROI) $8.2MBenefits PV $6.0MNet present value (NPV) Benefits (Three-Year)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Shorter implementation savings
Accelerated business value
Reduced risk of project failure savings
Faster adoption of Salesforce innovation
Long-term savings
The Salesforce Professional Services Customer JourneyDrivers leading to the Salesforce Professional Services investmentInterviews
Key ChallengesBoth interviewees and survey respondents (“decision-makers”) engaged with Salesforce Professional Services at various points in their organizations’ Salesforce journeys to address a range of organizational and/or platform challenges. Prior to working with Salesforce Professional Services, the decision-makers’ organizations were in one or more of the following moments in their Salesforce journeys:
Decision-makers noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Why Salesforce Professional Services?The decision-makers’ organizations engaged Salesforce Professional Services to:
What were the main business objectives of your engagement with Salesforce Professional Services?[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Improve customer experience
Improve user experience
Increase Salesforce adoption
Build a foundation for future innovation/adoption of new Salesforce capabilities
Prepare our organization to adopt AI capabilities in the future
Generate more value from a Salesforce investment
Support digital transformation initiative(s)
Accelerate time to market for a critical initiative
Optimize infrastructure and/or licensing costs
Improve employee productivity
Enable new growth opportunities
Reduce ongoing technology management and maintenance costs
Base: 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM Composite OrganizationBased on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Salesforce embeds a team of consultants for a 12-month engagement, providing hands-on advisory, implementation services, and change management support. The engagement concludes within Year 1 of the investment. KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis Of BenefitsQuantified benefit data as applied to the compositeTotal Benefits
Shorter Implementation SavingsEvidence and data. Decision-makers reported that their organizations reached their project objectives more quickly with Salesforce Professional Services than they would have without it, reducing their implementation timelines between 24% to 50%. By shortening timelines, decision-makers avoided internal labor and incremental consulting costs. They shared the following experiences:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million. 40%Reduction in implementation duration Shorter Implementation Savings
Accelerated Business ValueEvidence and data. The decision-makers’ organizations realized business value faster than they would have without Salesforce Professional Services. With shorter project timelines and faster releases of MVPs, organizations improved time to value for business outcomes aligned with their respective Salesforce engagements. These MVPs provided users with access to core capabilities, creating a foundation for iterative enhancements as their engagements progressed. Decision-makers shared the following experiences:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.8 million. 3 monthsReduced time to MVP Accelerated Business Value
Reduced Risk Of Project Failure SavingsEvidence and data. Decision-makers reported that Salesforce Professional Services played an important role in guaranteeing project success. Survey respondents shared that engaging Salesforce Professional Services reduced the risk of project failure by an average of 51%, compared to other implementation approaches.14 Salesforce Professional Services reduced risk by:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary. There will always be some level of implementation and impact risk in a technology investment. Therefore, Forrester has limited the risk reduction to 50%. Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 0%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $917,000. 50%Reduced risk of project failure with Salesforce Professional Services Reduced Risk Of Project Failure Savings
Faster Adoption Of Salesforce InnovationEvidence and data. Salesforce releases software updates three times a year with new features and platform enhancements. In the survey, 85% of respondents reported that engaging Salesforce Professional Services enabled their organizations to adopt new Salesforce releases sooner. These survey respondents shared that their organizations reduced the time to adopt releases by 26%.16 Decision-makers noted that Salesforce Professional Services positioned their organizations to adopt Salesforce releases sooner by:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The impact of this benefit will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $138,000. 26%Faster adoption of Salesforce innovation Faster Adoption Of Salesforce Innovation
Long-Term SavingsEvidence and data. The decision-makers’ organizations realized long-term benefits after their engagement with Salesforce Professional Services. In fact, 86% of survey respondents reported that working with Salesforce Professional Services helped reduce their organizations’ long-term operations and management costs.18 Decision-makers said that Salesforce Professional Services helped them:
11 hoursReduced annual cost of training per employee after Salesforce Professional Services Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences and the benefit will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.8 million. Long-Term Savings
Unquantified BenefitsInterviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Did you engage a systems integrator (SI) or other consulting partner organization to work alongside Salesforce Professional Services?[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Salesforce Professional Services worked side by side with an SI/partner owning different work streams
A partner/SI was prime, and Salesforce Professional services provided support
Salesforce Professional Services was prime, and an SI/partner provided support
We worked only with Salesforce Professional Services
Base: 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM FlexibilityThe value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Salesforce Professional Services and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach). Analysis Of CostsQuantified cost data as applied to the compositeTotal Costs
Salesforce Professional Services Engagement FeesEvidence and data. Engagement fees for Salesforce Professional Services are based on project scope. Interviewees reported engagement costs ranging between $700,000 and $17 million. Pricing will vary. Contact a Salesforce representative for additional details. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. This cost will vary depending on the organization’s scope, duration, and objectives for each engagement. Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.9 million. Salesforce Professional Services Engagement Fees
Incremental Project And Change Management LaborEvidence and data. Survey respondents identified time spent on project management as the top internal cost incurred during their Salesforce engagement.25 Interviewees more commonly described leveraging internal product managers to coordinate workstreams and manage collaboration with the Salesforce Professional Services team. Two interviewees also noted that their organization dedicated resources to drive change management in collaboration with Salesforce experts. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. This cost will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $293,000. Incremental Project And Change Management Labor
Financial SummaryConsolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted MetricsCash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs
Total benefits
Cumulative net benefits
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
Please NoteThe financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis. These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section. The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur. From the information provided in the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Salesforce Professional Services. The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Salesforce Professional Services can have on an organization. Due DiligenceInterviewed Salesforce stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Salesforce Professional Services. Interviews And SurveyInterviewed five decision-makers and surveyed 216 respondents at organizations using Salesforce Professional Services to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks. Composite OrganizationDesigned a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations. Financial Model FrameworkConstructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents. Case StudyEmployed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology. Total Economic Impact ApproachBenefitsBenefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization. CostsCosts comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution. FlexibilityFlexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated. RisksRisks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.” Financial TerminologyPresent value (PV)The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feeds into the total NPV of cash flows. Net present value (NPV)The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs. Return on investment (ROI)A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs. Discount rateThe interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%. PaybackThe break-even point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost. Appendix ATotal Economic ImpactTotal Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. Appendix BSurvey Demographics[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]
*Percentages do not add up to 100% due to rounding [CONTENT]
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]
*Percentages do not add up to 100% due to rounding Appendix CEndnotes1 Source: The Future of CRM, Forrester Research, Inc., June 6, 2023; AI Impact On CRM Operations, Forrester Research, Inc., April 10, 2025; The Salesforce Consulting Services Landscape, Q1 2023, Forrester Research, Inc., February 1, 2023. 2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. 3 This information in this callout is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to how Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization build a more flexible platform foundation?” Of these respondents, 68% selected either “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “positioned our organization to more quickly adopt Salesforce AI capabilities (e.g. Einstein, Agentforce) in the future.” 4 This information in this callout is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “Do you anticipate that the benefits to your organization created by your investment in Salesforce Professional Services will be greater than the costs (e.g., a positive ROI)?” Of these respondents, 90% selected “yes.” 5 The information in these bullets is based on both customer interview evidence and a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “What was your Salesforce environment before your organization's engagement with Salesforce Professional Services? (Select all that apply.)” Of these respondents, 52% selected “We had several instances of the Salesforce platform that we needed to consolidate and rationalize”; 47% selected “We had an existing Salesforce implementation but needed support to deploy a new product or capability”; 41% selected “We were brand new to the Salesforce platform and needed help with initial implementation”; 31% selected “We had previously attempted an implementation with a consulting partner, but efforts failed”; and 23% selected “We had previously attempted a Salesforce implementation on our own, but efforts failed.” 6 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “What were some of the key factors or pain points that drove your organization to engage with Salesforce Professional Services? (Select all that apply.)” Of these respondents, 60% selected “We were not getting expected/full value from the existing deployment.” 7 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “What were some of the key factors or pain points that drove your organization to engage with Salesforce Professional Services? (Select all that apply.)” Of these respondents, 49% selected “We lacked internal expertise or bandwidth to execute the implementation or project successfully.” 8 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “What percentage of your Salesforce implementation was customized (using custom code instead of the box features) before and after Salesforce Professional Services?” On average, respondents reported 42% for the answer option “customization before engaging with Salesforce Professional Services.” 9 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “Why did your organization engage professional services directly from Salesforce? (Select all that apply.)” Of these respondents, 66% selected “Salesforce provided a clearer path to self-sufficiency.” 10 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “Why did your organization engage professional services directly from Salesforce? (Select all that apply.)” Of these respondents, 44% selected “We wanted to improve end-to-end accountability for project success.” 11 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements regarding time to value and implementation timelines and costs?” Of these respondents, 72% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services reduced overall time required for the implementation or project.” These respondents were asked a follow-up question: “You noted that Salesforce Professional Services reduced overall time required for the implementation or project. Using your best estimate, how many weeks do you feel your organization has saved in the overall time required for the implementation or project by engaging with Salesforce Professional Services?” Forrester calculated the average time savings using the estimates from the respondents who agreed or strongly agreed, then weighted these results across the full survey population, including those who did not agree. This produced a weighted average time savings of 4.4 months. 12 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements regarding time to value and implementation timelines and costs?” Of these respondents, 83% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services reduced time to MVP.” These respondents were asked a follow-up question: “You noted that Salesforce Professional Services reduced overall time to minimum viable product (MVP). Using your best estimate, how many weeks do you feel your organization has saved in time to MVP by engaging with Salesforce Professional Services?” Forrester calculated the average time savings using the estimates from the respondents who agreed or strongly agreed, then weighted these results across the full survey population, including those who did not agree. This produced a weighted average of 11.7 weeks, which is rounded up to three months. 13 Source: “The Total Economic Impact™ Of Salesforce B2B Commerce,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Salesforce, May 2024; Source: “The Total Economic Impact™ Of Salesforce Service Cloud,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Salesforce, February 2024; Source: “The Total Economic Impact ™ Of Salesforce Marketing Cloud” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Salesforce, January 2023. 14 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much did engaging Salesforce Professional Services reduce the risk of project failure compared to using other implementation approaches?” In the context of project failure, we mean that the project does not meet its original objectives, including effectively addressing business goals, achieving expected functionality, and/or driving expected user adoption. Failure can also include poor system performance, low stakeholder satisfaction, or the need for significant rework. A score of 100% means that Salesforce Professional Services completely eliminated the risk of failure, and 1% means it had minimal impact, at an average of 51%. 15 Source: “The Total Economic Impact™ Of Salesforce B2B Commerce,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Salesforce, May 2024; Source: “The Total Economic Impact™ Of Salesforce Service Cloud,” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Salesforce, February 2024; Source: “The Total Economic Impact ™ Of Salesforce Marketing Cloud” a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Salesforce, January 2023. 16 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to how Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization build a more flexible platform foundation?” Of these respondents, 85% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “helped our organization adopt new Salesforce releases sooner.” These respondents were asked a follow-up question: “You noted that Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization adopt new Salesforce releases sooner. What was the average time it took to adopt a new Salesforce release before and after your engagement with Salesforce Professional Services?” The average time to adopt a new release was 26% faster after engaging Salesforce Professional Services than before. 17 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to how Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization build a more flexible platform foundation?” Of these respondents, 74% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “architected using out-of-the-box and configuration over customization.” The entire survey population was also asked “What percentage of your Salesforce implementation was customized (using custom code instead of the box features) before and after Salesforce Professional Services?” On average, survey respondents reported 42.4% for the answer option “customization before engaging with Salesforce Professional Services” and 32.8% for the answer option “customization after engaging with Salesforce Professional Services.” 18 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to self-sufficiency and long-term success?” Of these respondents, 86% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services reduced long-term operations/management costs.” 19 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to how Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization build a more flexible platform foundation?” Of these respondents, 63% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services reduced technical debt.” 20 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey follow-up question directed to the 136 decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who indicated that their organizations reduced technical debt: “You noted that engaging with Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization reduce technical debt. How much do you agree with the following statements?” Of these respondents, 91% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services reduced rework and/or refactoring of code.” Factoring in respondents who did not agree that their organizations reduced technical debt, Forrester concluded that over half of the survey respondents reported a reduced need for rework and refactoring of code as a result of their engagement with Salesforce Professional Services. Additionally, 123 survey respondents reported an average reduction of 49% when responding to the question “You noted that engaging with Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization reduce rework and/or refactoring of code. How have your organization’s rework and/or refactoring costs changed by engaging with Salesforce Professional Services?” — leading to a weighted average of 28%. 21 The information in this paragraph is based on several survey questions: 1) Of the 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were surveyed, 50% selected the answer option “Enabled our organization to realize more value from the overall Salesforce investment” when asked the question “Which of the following benefits has your organization realized as a result of its investment in Salesforce Professional Services? (Select all that apply.)” In a follow-up question, these respondents shared an 8.5x average when responding to the question “You said that Salesforce Professional Services enabled your organization to realize more value from the overall Salesforce investment. Please estimate how much more ROI your organization has realized.” 2) Of the 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were surveyed, 86% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Improved employee productivity and user experience” in response to the question “How much do you agree with the following statements regarding business impacts and user adoption resulting from your engagement with Salesforce Professional Services?” Forrester calculated a weighted average of 2.3 hours based on the follow-up question “You noted that engaging with Salesforce Professional Services helped increase employee productivity. How much time on average do you think the Salesforce end user saves per week as a result of your organization’s engagement with Salesforce Professional Services (e.g., as a result of more efficient process design, activation of high impact features, high quality training, etc.)?” 3) Of the 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were surveyed, 84% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “improved customer experience” in response to the question “How much do you agree with the following statements regarding business impacts and user adoption resulting from your engagement with Salesforce Professional Services?” 22 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to self-sufficiency and long-term success?” Of these respondents, 71% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services shared Salesforce best practices”; 54% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services helped establish a Salesforce Center of Excellence”; and 59% selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services helped establish a Salesforce operating model and governance structure.” 23 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM. Of these respondents, 73% responded selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “Salesforce Professional Services helped improve risk mitigation and security” in response to the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to how Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization build a more flexible platform foundation?” Additionally, 56% of respondents selected “creating/maturing our data strategy” and “building comprehensive data architecture and integration strategies” in response to the question “What areas of support did Salesforce Professional Services provide to your organization? (select all that apply).” 24 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked “What are your company's plans when it comes to implementing AI solutions?” Of these respondents, a combined 60% selected “implemented but not expanding or upgrading” or “expanding or upgrading implementation” and 28% selected “planning to implement in the next 12 months.” Additionally, 68% of survey respondents selected “strongly agree” or “agree” for the answer option “positioned our organization to more quickly adopt Salesforce AI capabilities (e.g. Einstein, Agentforce) in the future” in response to the question “How much do you agree with the following statements related to how Salesforce Professional Services helped your organization build a more flexible platform foundation?” 25 The information in this paragraph is based on a survey of 216 IT and business decision-makers with responsibility for CRM who were asked “What were the most significant upfront internal costs your organization incurred as a part of its Salesforce engagement? (Select all that apply.)” Of these respondents, 61% selected “time for project management.” DisclosuresReaders should be aware of the following: This study is commissioned by Salesforce and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis. Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Salesforce Professional Services. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Salesforce Professional Services based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Salesforce or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Salesforce and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided “as is,” and Forrester and Salesforce make no warranties of any kind. Salesforce reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study. Salesforce provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews. Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third-party survey partner. Consulting Team:Kara Luk PublishedFebruary 2026 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html