Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions by Tricentis

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Enterprise Application Assurance Through AI-Enhanced Automated Testing

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY sap AND TRICENTIS, march 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions by Tricentis

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY sap AND TRICENTIS, march 2026

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Enterprise Application Assurance Through AI-Enhanced Automated Testing

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Enterprises today face mounting pressure to upgrade and consolidate their business-critical systems and applications while maintaining continuity and compliance. However, fragmented testing strategies, legacy tools, and manual processes can hinder their ability to scale, innovate, and respond quickly to market or regulatory changes. Organizations that adopt QA best practices like automated testing can meet the challenges of their wide-reaching transformations and improve organizationwide agility, with a roadmap for navigating similar pressures.

SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis are a suite of quality assurance solutions that help automate the testing lifecycles of SAP applications, in-house developed applications, and those of other vendors. SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis automates the analysis of SAP system software changes, reducing the scope of testing to only those changes that carry risk. SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis is a no-code, model-based, AI-driven solution to create and execute automated test cases, increasing the rate of application releases and improving their time-to-value. SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis automates testing at high user loads, ensuring applications meet performance, capacity, and usage requirements. Lastly, SAP Enterprise Data Integrity Testing by Tricentis ensures data accuracy and quality across applications, identifying discrepancies and inaccuracies in data before these enter production.

SAP and Tricentis commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of the solutions on their organizations.

403%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$9 million

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six decision-makers with experience using SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis, SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis, and SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which has $30 billion in revenue and 40,000 employees.

Interviewees said that prior to using SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis, their organizations relied heavily on manual testing or fragmented automation tools that were difficult to scale, lacked SAP compatibility, and required high levels of technical expertise. These prior tools yielded limited success, leaving them with inconsistent testing coverage, slow release cycles, and high maintenance burdens. Such limitations led to delayed digital transformation efforts, increased risk of production defects, and significant inefficiencies in both testing operations and business responsiveness.

After the investment in SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis, the interviewees reported a shift from fragmented, manual, or code-intensive testing approaches to streamlined, automated, and scalable testing practices that enabled agile testing environments for SAP and other platforms. Key results from the investment included significant increases in test automation coverage, reductions in testing time and effort, and measurable cost savings through reduced resource needs, faster release cycles, and fewer production defects.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Financial gains of $533,000 from reducing testing scope by 84% and hypercare costs by 45%. Leveraging SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis enables the composite organization to gain visibility into how changes to software will impact its execution, before going through the testing cycle. This enables the composite to intelligently target test conditions and run testing — especially manual testing — only on test conditions with functional risk, reducing the scope of testing conditions from 25,000 to about 4,000 conditions. This 84% reduction enables the composite to shorten hypercare (i.e., intensive application support periods after releases) by about 1.5 weeks, or 45%, providing the composite a combined risk-adjusted, three-year net present value of $533,000.

  • Cost savings of $1.7 million from improving process automation by 33%, eliminating 93% of production errors earlier, and avoiding 1.64 FTEs worth of management costs via decommissioning legacy technology. The composite leverages SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis to integrate end-to-end testing of its applications, achieving a 90% test case automation rate and avoiding 33% of the cost of testing resources. Automation, combined with targeted testing from SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis, eliminates 93% of production errors. The composite also decommissions a legacy test automation technology, avoiding costs equivalent to 1.64 FTEs. In total, this benefit provides a risk-adjusted, three-year net present value of $1.7 million to the composite.

  • Improved business value of $7.8 million from reducing time-to-release by 83% and increasing application release rate by 500%. Automation has the added effect of reducing the time needed to run testing cycles, improving the time-to-release of applications to end users. Employees previously waited six months between the composite’s two annual application releases, which is now reduced to only one month of wait time between the composite’s 10 annual releases. With each release, employees also experience efficiency gains of 2.5%. This benefit is worth a risk-adjusted, three-year net present value of $7.8 million to the composite.

  • Cost savings of $1.3 million from reducing performance testing cycles by 99% and avoiding an additional 45% of hypercare costs. The composite leverages SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis to automate its performance testing and reduce such testing cycles by over 99%: from 20 person-days to only one hour for each cycle. This enables the composite to run performance tests more frequently at an improved rate of 1,250%: from once quarterly to once every week. Furthermore, automated and more frequent performance testing resolve stability issues that would have otherwise gone to production, avoiding an additional 45% of hypercare costs (now totaling 90% savings across two solutions). In total, this benefit alone is worth a risk-adjusted, three-year net present value of $1.3 million to the composite.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Added value of AI. The composite organization benefits from AI-powered features in SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions by Tricentis, such as Vision AI and self-healing, which enable automation of UI-driven test cases and reduce the burden of test maintenance. These capabilities help prevent false positives and ensure test suites remain stable even as applications evolve. As a result, the composite could experience further improved automation rates, even faster release cycles, and more testing cost reductions.

  • Increased sales. Automating performance testing enables the composite organization to improve the speed and efficiency of customer-facing applications, such as sales platforms. This performance enhancement reduces the time required to complete key transactions — like generating contracts — from 10 minutes to under three minutes. Such gains can directly translate into increased daily throughput and revenue potential, while positively impacting the experience for end customers.

  • Enhanced tester satisfaction. The composite organization sees improved employee satisfaction among testing teams following the adoption of SAP enterprise QA solutions by Tricentis. Automation reduces repetitive manual tasks, allowing testers to focus on more complex, value-added work. This shift enhances team morale and fosters a greater sense of ownership and control over product quality.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Licensing costs. The composite organization pays $200,000 annually for SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis based on the amount of data ingested, $300,000 annually for SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis based on the number of concurrent connections required, and $70,000 annually for SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis based on the number of virtual users needed for production-approximating load testing. The risk-adjusted, three-year net present value of these costs amount to $1.6 million.

  • Implementation and deployment costs. The composite organization pays $175,000 up front for implementation services and requires an equivalent of 2.5 FTEs for two months on implementation and deployment. These costs equate to a risk-adjusted value of $254,000.

  • Training and ongoing management costs. The composite organization needs four hours to train each tester and the equivalent of one FTE to manage SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis on an ongoing basis. This equates to a risk-adjusted, three-year net present value of $363,000.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $11.3 million over three years versus costs of $2.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $9 million and an ROI of 403%.

Productive time returned to each end user from faster application release cycles.

129 hours

“Our specific annual rate of return has been close to 19:1. We’re spending $1.6 million a year and achieving $30 million in annual savings.”

Senior test manager, CPG

Key Statistics

403%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$11.3 million

Benefits PV 

$9 million

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Financial Benefits Of SAP Change Impact Analysis By Tricentis
Reduced Costs From SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis
Business Value From SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis
Financial Benefits Of SAP Enterprise Performance Testing By Tricentis

The SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions by Tricentis Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis investment
Interviews
Role Industry Region Total Employees
Agile coach Insurance EMEA 15,000
Test manager IT services EMEA 25,000
SAP test manager Energy North America 30,000
Senior director of software engineering Retail Global 60,000
Data analytics transformation lead Telecommunications Global 90,000
Senior test manager Consumer packaged goods (CPG) Global 100,000
Key Challenges

Before implementing SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis, the interviewees’ organizations typically relied on a mix of manual testing and fragmented legacy automation tools.

Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Manual and fragmented testing processes. The interviewees described their organizations’ testing environments as fragmented and heavily reliant on manual processes. Teams often used a patchwork of tools that lacked integration and required significant effort to maintain. Testing was inconsistent across departments, with little standardization or reuse of assets. This led to duplicated work, limited visibility, and delays in identifying issues. As a result, release cycles were slow, and teams struggled to keep up with the pace of change in their SAP environments.

  • Limited automation and high maintenance burden. Interviewees shared that their organizations had low levels of test automation prior to adopting SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis. Existing automation frameworks required frequent updates and were highly sensitive to changes in the application, which led to frequent test failures and high maintenance costs. Even small UI changes could break test scripts, forcing teams to spend time troubleshooting rather than delivering value. This created bottlenecks in testing processes and made it difficult to scale automation across teams. Representatives emphasized the need for a more resilient and maintainable solution to support their SAP testing needs.

  • Inability to effectively respond to organizational changes. Many representatives noted that their organizations were undergoing agile transformations or large-scale SAP modernization efforts, but their existing testing tools were not equipped to support these changes. Manual regression testing cycles were too long and unable to align with agile sprints or continuous delivery goals. Teams lacked the ability to prioritize testing based on business risk, which led to inefficient test coverage and missed defects. Without integrated, continuous testing capabilities, testing remained a separate and often delayed step in the development lifecycle. This limited their ability to deliver updates quickly and confidently in fast-moving business environments.

“Before, we only had manual testing with Excel… and only 10% to 20% test coverage.”

Test manager, IT services

“Our prior tools lacked agile and DevOps compatibility. They were mainly built for waterfall development, with very limited support for low-code or no-code testing or any AI-powered maintenance.”

Data analytics transformation lead, telecommunications

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a global business with 40,000 full-time employees and an annual revenue of $30 billion. It currently uses SAP solutions to manage its supply chain, logistics, invoicing, and several other finance workflows, and is undergoing a process to transition from its on-premises SAP deployment to SAP Cloud ERP that began two years ago. It has previously invested in an application testing automation solution but has seen limited results. Due to a lack of integration with its SAP solutions, the organization must still rely on some manual testing processes and suffers from an undesirably high number of production errors.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization employs 20 full-time testers. The composite had already achieved a 70% automation rate of testing with its prior application testing tool, which continues to rise after investing in SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis. On average, the organization tests around 25,000 conditions per six-month release cycle. It currently runs hypercare for its SAP applications and updates for a total of eight weeks through the year. 

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $30 billion in annual revenue

  • 40,000 employees

  • 20 full-time testers

  • 25,000 test cases

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Financial gains from reduced testing scope and hypercare costs $214,306 $214,306 $214,306 $642,918 $532,947
Btr Cost savings from automation, fewer production errors, and decommissioned technology $370,548 $787,644 $996,192 $2,154,384 $1,736,261
Ctr Improved business value from reduced time-to-release and increased application release rate $3,120,000 $3,120,000 $3,120,000 $9,360,000 $7,758,978
Dtr Cost savings from reduced performance testing cycles and hypercare costs $515,160 $515,160 $515,160 $1,545,480 $1,281,127
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $4,220,014 $4,637,110 $4,845,658 $13,702,782 $11,309,313
SAP Change Impact Analysis By Tricentis: Financial Gains From Reduced Testing Scope And Hypercare Costs

Evidence and data. SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis enables decision-makers to analyze the effect of potential software changes, and allow them to focus testing on the business and technical risks posed by those changes. With this focus, interviewees noted that their organizations were able to reduce the costs associated with both testing and hypercare. Before deployment, interviewees described testing processes that were operating blindly regarding risk. Their organizations had no clear understanding of the risks posed by potential software changes, which led them to utilize a high number of test conditions per application tested, hoping to reduce the statistical likelihood of production errors. Of course, such practices led to high testing costs.

After implementing SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis, the interviewees noted their organizations were able to move away from testing a high number of random conditions and begin targeting conditions that carried risk. For example, the data analytics transformation lead from the telecommunications organization shared that they were able to reduce test conditions from 20,000 to 1,000, and then further down to 800 test conditions per release without increasing the number of defects that made it into production. This added focus on risk also enabled their organization to save on hypercare. For those organizations that conducted hypercare, their representatives shared that of the total 90% reduction in hypercare costs from SAP enterprise application QA solution by Tricentis as a whole, SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis contributed 50% (net 45% contribution).

Interviewees also noted that SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis was vital to getting the full benefit of automation and more frequent releases associated with their investment in SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis. Without utilizing the former, interviewees felt the conservative nature of their organizations might prevent the approval of their now-faster release cycles due to fears of an increase in production errors.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • A total of 20 testing professionals engages in testing work, and another 20 engages in hypercare.

  • The prior number of annual application releases was two.

  • It needs six days to test 25,000 test conditions per release cycle.

  • SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis reduces test conditions by 84%.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate of a testing professional is $53.

  • Hypercare previously took eight full weeks per annum.

  • SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis reduces the length of hypercare by 45%.

Risks. The value gained from SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis will vary with:

  • The number of testing professionals.

  • The current release rate for application tests.

  • The time cost of testing and number of conditions tested per release.

  • The current number of professionals and time dedicated to hypercare.

  • The fully burdened rate of pay of a testing professional.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $533,000.

84%

Reduction in necessary test conditions

45%

Reduction in hypercare costs from SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis

“Application testing used to be like gambling, making assumptions that coverage is good enough. Now, it’s more like relying on science.”

Agile coach, insurance

Financial Gains From Reduced Testing Scope And Hypercare Costs
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Reduced testing costs from test reduction Interviews $85,478 $85,478 $85,478
A2 Reduced hypercare costs Interviews $152,640 $152,640 $152,640
At Financial gains from reduced testing scope and hypercare costs A1+A2 $238,118 $238,118 $238,118
  Risk adjustment ↓10%      
Atr Financial gains from reduced testing scope and hypercare costs (risk-adjusted)   $214,306 $214,306 $214,306
Three-year total: $642,918 Three-year present value: $532,947
SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis: Cost Savings From Process Automation, Fewer Production Errors, And Decommissioned Technology

Evidence and data. SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis enables organizations to implement no-code, model-based, easy-to-maintain, end-to-end automation of application testing. By improving the automation of testing and quality assurance practices, interviewees shared that their organizations reduced the cost of test execution, accelerated the validation of changes, and reduced the risk of defects impacting their businesses.

The interviewees noted improved application testing automation rates after deploying SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis. For example, the test manager at the IT services business also reported a large increase in automation, moving from only manual testing with 10% to 20% test case coverage to 80% test case coverage with automation. The agile coach at the insurance organization also noted a sizable improvement to automation, raising average SAP automation rates from 10% to 50%. However, some teams achieved automation rates of 80% to 90%. Interviewees attributed these improvements to the solution’s no-code, model-based automation, which negates the need for technical skills to directly create automation, its single interface for automation across multiple platforms and systems, and its tight integration with SAP.

With the introduction of model-based, no-code automated testing, the interviewees said their organizations reduced their need for skilled developers to focus on coding and programing testing automation scripts. They then began to reallocate their skilled developer resources from testing teams to higher value and higher impact development work. The agile coach at the insurance organization noted, “We’ll reduce resources by 30%, but it will be much higher for some divisions.” Reducing the number of more expensive resources on the testing team also reduced overall testing team costs.

Automation also enabled the interviewees’ organizations to minimize errors or incidents that made it into production. Interviewees shared that they were able to limit bugs that made it into production by between 70% and 93%, depending on the type of bug and amount of automation. The data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications organization noted: “SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis allows us to catch bugs within days instead of weeks, reducing the added, higher costs of bug fixing once in production. … We modeled a bug and found that, for 10,000 customers, that billing bug would cost $350,000.” The SAP test manager from the energy company shared: “Finding a defect in code could delay a release. If we didn’t have automated regression test conditions, not much would get done to ensure bugs don’t go into production.” The senior test manager from the CPG organization reported, “We detect defects every 10 minutes.”

Interviewees who had invested in an automated application testing solution prior to SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis were able to decommission these solutions. In doing so, these firms saved an approximate $80,000 annually on licensing costs and reallocated the resource responsible for managing that solution to SAP enterprise application QA Solutions by Tricentis as a whole, incurring no net additional ongoing management costs.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis reduces testing work by 33% via automation.

  • Automation benefits accrue at a rate of 25% in Year 1, 50% in Year 2, and 100% by Year 3.

  • On average, production errors cause a delay of eight hours and impact a conservative 200 employees.

  • Employees recapture an estimated 25% of their productivity from a reduction in production errors.

  • Every year, 10,000 customers are impacted by production errors with a cost to remediate of $30 per customer.

  • Automation reduces production errors by 93%.

  • Automation benefits accrue at a rate of 25% in Year 1, 50% in Year 2, and 100% by Year 3.

  • The composite decommissions a legacy automated testing tool, eliminating the annual licensing cost of $80,000.

  • Management costs of the decommissioned tool were equivalent to one tester annually at the time, which was $100,000.

Risks. The cost savings from SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis will vary with:

  • The number of testing professionals and the rate at which automation enables their reallocation to higher value work.

  • The number of employees impacted by production errors and their associated time costs.

  • The rates at which these employees’ productivity can be recaptured by reducing production errors.

  • The number of customers impacted by production errors and the associated remediation costs.

  • The licensing and internal labor costs of any current testing solutions decommissioned in favor of SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.7 million.

90%

Automated test coverage

93%

Reduction in production errors from automation

“With automation, we spend 10x less time on testing and save around 4x the amount of money.”

Senior director of software engineering, retail

“Automated testing is giving cost savings of 75 FTEs back to the company each year.”

Senior test manager, CPG

Cost Savings From Process Automation, Fewer Production Errors, And Decommissioned Technology
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Cost savings from improved automation Interviews $181,500 $544,500 $726,000
B2 Reduced cost of code errors Interviews $50,220 $150,660 $200,880
B3 Reduced cost of decommissioned tool Interviews $190,000 $190,000 $190,000
Bt Cost savings from automation, fewer production errors, and decommissioned technology B1+B2+B3 $421,720 $885,160 $1,116,880
  Risk adjustment ↓10%      
Btr Cost savings from automation, fewer production errors, and decommissioned technology (risk-adjusted)   $379,548 $796,644 $1,005,192
Three-year total: $2,181,384 Three-year present value: $1,758,643
SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis: Improved Business Value From Reduced Time-To-Release And Increased Application Release Rate

Evidence and data. The increase in automated testing from SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis not only reduced costs associated with manual testing and less efficient automated testing solutions, but also enabled the organizations to increase their rates of application releases. When testing professionals saw reduced testing times while simultaneously reducing production incidents, they made the case internally to move toward continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) practices, improving rates of release and increasing the business value of testing. The test manager of the IT services firm shared that they ran 15,000 test cases in 20 hours, while the senior director of engineering at the retail firm shared that they executed critical process testing daily, and regular testing weekly. Similarly, the agile coach at the insurance firm noted that they were releasing applications every two weeks, while the data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications firm noted that they were now updating their applications monthly instead of quarterly.

In terms of regression testing, the senior test manager from the CPG firm noted that their regression cycles were becoming more frequent, from weekly to daily. Meanwhile, the agile coach at the insurance firm noted their regression cycles moved from biweekly to daily. Similarly, the data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications firm noted a reduction from six weeks to less than two days in their regression cycles.

By improving their release rates, the interviewees were able to deliver necessary functionality updates to end users faster, improving the time-to-value of each release. The data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications organization explained: “More frequent updates mean the software becomes more reliable. New features can be accessed, old features can be accessed faster, features are enhanced to provide more value, etc. All of these increase our employee productivity, not to mention our internal Net Promoter Score (NPS).2

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis reduces the time-to-release of applications by 83%, from six months to one month.

  • Releases now occur five months faster.

  • A conservative average of 800 employees is impacted by each release.

  • Each release improves efficiency of these end users by a conservative 2.5%.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for each impacted employee is $40.

  • These employees are able to recapture 50% of the time efficiency productively.

Risks. The business value gained from SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis will vary with:

  • The current application release cycle.

  • The average efficiency improvement gained from each release.

  • The number of employees impacted by application release wait times.

  • The rates at which these employees’ productivity can be recaptured.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $7.8 million.

83%

Reduction in time to release

500%

Increase in rate of release

“Development speed increased by at least 9 times since adopting SAP enterprise QA solutions by Tricentis.”

Senior test manager, CPG

Improved Business Value From Reduced Time-To-Release And Increased Application Release Rate
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Months to release in prior environment Interviews 6 6 6
C2 Percentage reduction in time to release Interviews 83% 83% 83%
C3 Months needed to release applications after adopting SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing Interviews 1 1 1
C4 Months of productivity gained per release C1-C3 5 5 5
C5 Releases since adopting SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing 12/C3 12 12 12
C6 Employees impacted per release Composite 800 800 800
C7 Average efficiency improvement per impacted employee per release Composite 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
C8 Average fully burdened hourly rate per impacted employee Composite $40 $40 $40
C9 Productivity recapture rate Composite 50% 50% 50%
Ct Improved business value from reduced time-to-release and increased application release rate C4*2080/12*C5*C7*C6*C8*C9 $4,160,000 $4,160,000 $4,160,000
  Risk adjustment ↓25%      
Ctr Improved business value from reduced time-to-release and increased application release rate (risk-adjusted)   $3,120,000 $3,120,000 $3,120,000
Three-year total: $9,360,000 Three-year present value: $7,758,978
SAP Enterprise Performance Testing By Tricentis: Cost Savings From Reduced Performance Testing Cycles And Hypercare Costs

Evidence and data. SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis enables organizations to ensure that their applications will still meet performance, capacity, and usage requirements under heavy user loads. Interviewees noted that leveraging the solution enabled their organizations to save on costs associated with performance test maintenance, increase the frequency of performance test case execution, improve coverage of systems tested, and further reduce the costs of hypercare.

Interviewees shared that performance test automation enabled their organizations to reduce the time and cost of performance test maintenance. Interviewees noted that before adopting SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis, they had to spend approximately 20 person-days on test maintenance for each quarterly test set execution. With the solution, the time-to-execute test maintenance duration was reduced to between 30 minutes and one hour, depending on the load, achieving a total reduction of between 99.4% and 99.7%.

As test set maintenance time decreased, organizations were able to execute their performance test cases more frequently. Before, organizations were executing performance tests once every quarter. After, these organizations were able to execute performance tests once or twice a week, increasing the rate of performance testing between 12.5 times and 25 times. Organizations improved their performance testing frequency while also improving the number of systems tested from one to seven.

By improving their test maintenance time and test frequency, organizations further reduced their costs of hypercare. In fact, the test manager from the IT services industry reported that the organization was able to eliminate hypercare entirely.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Prior to adopting SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis, four performance tests were completed annually.

  • A total of 17 person-days were needed to run each performance test before.

  • The rate of performance testing increases by 12.5 times, enabling 50 performance tests to be completed annually.

  • The time-to-test for performance reduces by 99%.

  • The need for hypercare for performance-related application updates is reduced, avoiding an additional 45% of annual hypercare costs.

  • The composite reduces a total of 90% of its prior hypercare costs after deploying both SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis and SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis.

Risks. The value gained from SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis will vary with:

  • The current rate of performance testing.

  • The current time cost of performance tests.

  • The time cost of hypercare.

  • The fully burdened rate of professional testers.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $567,000.

99%

Reduction in performance testing costs

1,150%

Increase in performance testing frequency

45%

Further reduction to hypercare costs

90%

Total reduction to hypercare costs from SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis

“We had a cost reduction by 99% due to reducing maintenance from 20 days to several hours.”

Test manager, IT services

Cost Savings From Reduced Performance Testing Cycles And Hypercare Costs
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Increased execution of performance tests   $419,760 $419,760 $419,760
D2 Reduced costs of hypercare   $152,640 $152,640 $152,640
Dt Cost savings from reduced performance testing cycles and hypercare costs D1+D2 $572,400 $572,400 $572,400
  Risk adjustment ↓10%      
Dtr Cost savings from reduced performance testing cycles and hypercare costs
(risk-adjusted)
  $515,160 $515,160 $515,160
Three-year total: $1,545,480 Three-year present value: $1,281,127
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Added value of AI. SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis leverage AI in unique ways to improve testing processes. The Vision AI feature enables the automation of test cases that are focused on UI changes that would normally not be prone to automation and usually require manual testing. AI-based self-healing capabilities automatically update tests when applications change — reducing test maintenance and preventing false positives. The adoption and usage of Vision AI and self-healing could further increase the benefits reported by the interviewees in relation to test automation rates, time to release, and test maintenance costs. The data analytics transformation lead from the telecommunications firm noted, “Self-healing test automation has reduced test maintenance and is keeping our suites stable.”

  • Increased sales. While most interviewees noted that automated testing improved the efficiency of testing teams and the productivity of end users, the test manager from the IT services firm noted: “SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis has made our client’s insurance software faster. Where their salespeople used to generate a contract in 10 minutes on average, the increase in performance testing has made the software more efficient. They now generate contracts in three minutes or less.”

  • Enhanced tester satisfaction. The interviewees reported that employee satisfaction improved among testing teams after the introduction of SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis. For example, the agile coach from the insurance industry shared: “We already see a lot of improvements from both a quality perspective and a satisfaction perspective. Our agile teams feel more in control of the end product now.” The data and analytics transformation lead from the telecommunications firm said: “Engineers get bored of manual tasks. Automated testing allows them to focus their energy and skills on more complex activities. It’s a big win for everyone.”

“Self-healing is on our radar. It is the logical first step for us in terms of AI adoption. It could really help with data-related test failures.”

Senior director of engineering, retail

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • SAP S/4HANA migration. The interviewees noted particular benefits around leveraging SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis for their migration to SAP S/4HANA. While several interviewees noted that they planned to use the automated testing solutions for their organization’s transition so as to shorten lead times, the SAP test manager from the energy company reported: “We have loads of test cases that are SAP-specific — in order to cut down on testing all of those for the transition to SAP S/4HANA, we ran SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis to compare the differences between the prior SAP GUI and the current GUI. We then only made the required changes that would support the SAP upgrade, rationalizing the amount of testing needed.”

  • Organizational agility. The interviewees also noted that the improvement to release rates improved the rate at which new features and innovation could be deployed across the organization, increasing the rate of innovation adoption and making their organizations more agile. The data analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications organization said: “Faster releases have allowed us to respond more quickly to market shifts and regulatory changes. Teams are delivering updates and features to internal users and customers more frequently, improving agility and satisfaction.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Etr Licensing costs $0 $655,500 $655,500 $655,500 $1,966,500 $1,630,131
Ftr Implementation and deployment costs $253,958 $0 $0 $0 $253,958 $253,958
Gtr Training and ongoing management costs $39,008 $130,401 $130,401 $130,401 $430,211 $363,296
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $292,966 $785,901 $785,901 $785,901 $2,650,669 $2,247,385
Licensing Costs

Evidence and data. SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis are priced as follows:

  • SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis is priced according to the size of the production database.

  • SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis is priced according to the required number of concurrent connections to the solution.

  • SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis is priced according to the total number of virtual users needed to test application performance under production-approximating user loads.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • It pays a total licensing cost of $200,000 annually for SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis based on the size of the production database.

  • It pays a total licensing cost of $300,000 annually for SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis based on the required number of concurrent connections to the solution.

  • It pays a total licensing cost of $70,000 annually for SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis based on the number of virtual users needed to accurately approximate production-scale load on the composite’s applications.

Risks. Licensing costs will vary with:

  • The total size of the production database tested with SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis.

  • The number of concurrent connections needed for SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis.

  • The total number of virtual users needed to approximate production load for SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million.

Licensing Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis licensing fees SAP   $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
E2 SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis licensing fees SAP   $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
E3 SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis licensing fees SAP   $70,000 $70,000 $70,000
Et Licensing costs E1+E2+E3 $0 $570,000 $570,000 $570,000
  Risk adjustment ↑15%        
Etr Licensing costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $655,500 $655,500 $655,500
Three-year total: $1,966,500 Three-year present value: $1,630,131
Implementation And Deployment Costs

Evidence and data. Although the interviewees typically opted to utilize implementation services provided by SAP and Tricentis, they also incurred internal time costs to help implement and deploy the automated testing solutions alongside the professional services teams.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Implementation service fees are $175,000.

  • Implementation and deployment takes two months and requires 2.5 testing professionals to accomplish.

Risks. The total cost of implementation and deployment will vary with:

  • The number of SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis to be implemented and deployed.

  • The use of implementation services.

  • The time cost of internal resources for implementation and deployment.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $ $254,000.

Implementation And Deployment Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Implementation services fee SAP, Tricentis $175,000 $0 $0 $0
F2 Months of implementation and deployment work Interviews 2 $0 $0 $0
F3 Employees needed for implementation and deployment Interviews 2.5 $0 $0 $0
F4 Fully burdened annual rate of an FTE Composite $110,000 $0 $0 $0
Ft Implementation and deployment costs F1+F2*F3*F4*1/12 $220,833 $0 $0 $0
  Risk adjustment ↑15%        
Ftr Implementation and deployment costs (risk-adjusted)   $253,958 $0 $0 $0
Three-year total: $253,958 Three-year present value: $253,958
Training And Ongoing Management Costs

Evidence and data. The interviewees also shared that their organizations incurred both training and ongoing management costs associated with their investment in SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis. The interviewees reported that training required about four days for each professional tester.

Ongoing management costs varied by the number of solutions and number of professional testers and ranged between 0.15 and 0.35 FTEs per solution. Ongoing management activities included issue and environment management, as well as long-term strategy and planning.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • An initial cost of training equivalent to four days at eight hours each for 20 testers.

  • An ongoing cost of training to account for turnover, equivalent to the same time cost for two testers each year.

  • A cost of ongoing management equal to one full-time professional tester for the combined set of solutions.

Risks. The cost of training and ongoing management will vary with:

  • The number of SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis deployed.

  • The number of testers requiring training.

  • The size of the SAP applications and environments tested.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $363,000.

Training And Ongoing Management Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Training cost Interviews $33,920 $3,392 $3,392 $3,392
G2 Ongoing management cost Interviews $0 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000
Gt Training and ongoing management costs G1+G2 $33,920 $113,392 $113,392 $113,392
  Risk adjustment ↑15%        
Gtr Training and ongoing management costs (risk-adjusted)   $39,008 $130,401 $130,401 $130,401
Three-year total: $430,211 Three-year present value: $363,296

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($292,966) ($785,901) ($785,901) ($785,901) ($2,650,669) ($2,247,385)
Total benefits $0 $4,220,014 $4,637,110 $4,845,658 $13,702,782 $11,309,313
Net benefits ($292,966) $3,434,113 $3,851,209 $4,059,757 $11,052,113 $9,061,928
ROI           403%
Payback           Less than 6

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed SAP and Tricentis stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis.

Interviews

Interviewed six decision-makers at organizations using SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

2 Net Promoter and NPS are registered service marks, and Net Promoter Score is a service mark, of Bain & Company, Inc., Satmetrix Systems, Inc., and Fred Reichheld.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by SAP and Tricentis and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance solutions by Tricentis. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance solutions by Tricentis based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse SAP or Tricentis or their offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, SAP,Tricentis, and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and SAP and Tricentis make no warranties of any kind.

SAP and Tricentis reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

SAP and Tricentis provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Nick Mayberry

Published

March 2026

The Total Economic Impact™ Of SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions By Tricentis.