Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Enterprise Application Assurance Through AI-Enhanced Automated Testing
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY sap AND TRICENTIS, march 2026
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Economic Impact The Total Economic Impact™ Of SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions by TricentisA FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY sap AND TRICENTIS, march 2026 Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Enterprise Application Assurance Through AI-Enhanced Automated Testing
Executive SummaryEnterprises today face mounting pressure to upgrade and consolidate their business-critical systems and applications while maintaining continuity and compliance. However, fragmented testing strategies, legacy tools, and manual processes can hinder their ability to scale, innovate, and respond quickly to market or regulatory changes. Organizations that adopt QA best practices like automated testing can meet the challenges of their wide-reaching transformations and improve organizationwide agility, with a roadmap for navigating similar pressures. SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis are a suite of quality assurance solutions that help automate the testing lifecycles of SAP applications, in-house developed applications, and those of other vendors. SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis automates the analysis of SAP system software changes, reducing the scope of testing to only those changes that carry risk. SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis is a no-code, model-based, AI-driven solution to create and execute automated test cases, increasing the rate of application releases and improving their time-to-value. SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis automates testing at high user loads, ensuring applications meet performance, capacity, and usage requirements. Lastly, SAP Enterprise Data Integrity Testing by Tricentis ensures data accuracy and quality across applications, identifying discrepancies and inaccuracies in data before these enter production. SAP and Tricentis commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of the solutions on their organizations. To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six decision-makers with experience using SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis, SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis, and SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which has $30 billion in revenue and 40,000 employees. Interviewees said that prior to using SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis, their organizations relied heavily on manual testing or fragmented automation tools that were difficult to scale, lacked SAP compatibility, and required high levels of technical expertise. These prior tools yielded limited success, leaving them with inconsistent testing coverage, slow release cycles, and high maintenance burdens. Such limitations led to delayed digital transformation efforts, increased risk of production defects, and significant inefficiencies in both testing operations and business responsiveness. After the investment in SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis, the interviewees reported a shift from fragmented, manual, or code-intensive testing approaches to streamlined, automated, and scalable testing practices that enabled agile testing environments for SAP and other platforms. Key results from the investment included significant increases in test automation coverage, reductions in testing time and effort, and measurable cost savings through reduced resource needs, faster release cycles, and fewer production defects. Key FindingsQuantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $11.3 million over three years versus costs of $2.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $9 million and an ROI of 403%. Productive time returned to each end user from faster application release cycles. 129 hoursKey Statistics403%Return on investment (ROI) $11.3 millionBenefits PV $9 millionNet present value (NPV) <6 monthsPayback Benefits (Three-Year)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Financial Benefits Of SAP Change Impact Analysis By Tricentis
Reduced Costs From SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis
Business Value From SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis
Financial Benefits Of SAP Enterprise Performance Testing By Tricentis
The SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions by Tricentis Customer JourneyDrivers leading to the SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis investmentInterviews
Key ChallengesBefore implementing SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis, the interviewees’ organizations typically relied on a mix of manual testing and fragmented legacy automation tools. Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Composite OrganizationBased on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis Of BenefitsQuantified benefit data as applied to the compositeTotal Benefits
SAP Change Impact Analysis By Tricentis: Financial Gains From Reduced Testing Scope And Hypercare CostsEvidence and data. SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis enables decision-makers to analyze the effect of potential software changes, and allow them to focus testing on the business and technical risks posed by those changes. With this focus, interviewees noted that their organizations were able to reduce the costs associated with both testing and hypercare. Before deployment, interviewees described testing processes that were operating blindly regarding risk. Their organizations had no clear understanding of the risks posed by potential software changes, which led them to utilize a high number of test conditions per application tested, hoping to reduce the statistical likelihood of production errors. Of course, such practices led to high testing costs. After implementing SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis, the interviewees noted their organizations were able to move away from testing a high number of random conditions and begin targeting conditions that carried risk. For example, the data analytics transformation lead from the telecommunications organization shared that they were able to reduce test conditions from 20,000 to 1,000, and then further down to 800 test conditions per release without increasing the number of defects that made it into production. This added focus on risk also enabled their organization to save on hypercare. For those organizations that conducted hypercare, their representatives shared that of the total 90% reduction in hypercare costs from SAP enterprise application QA solution by Tricentis as a whole, SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis contributed 50% (net 45% contribution). Interviewees also noted that SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis was vital to getting the full benefit of automation and more frequent releases associated with their investment in SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis. Without utilizing the former, interviewees felt the conservative nature of their organizations might prevent the approval of their now-faster release cycles due to fears of an increase in production errors. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The value gained from SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $533,000. 84%Reduction in necessary test conditions 45%Reduction in hypercare costs from SAP Change Impact Analysis by Tricentis Financial Gains From Reduced Testing Scope And Hypercare Costs
SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis: Cost Savings From Process Automation, Fewer Production Errors, And Decommissioned TechnologyEvidence and data. SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis enables organizations to implement no-code, model-based, easy-to-maintain, end-to-end automation of application testing. By improving the automation of testing and quality assurance practices, interviewees shared that their organizations reduced the cost of test execution, accelerated the validation of changes, and reduced the risk of defects impacting their businesses. The interviewees noted improved application testing automation rates after deploying SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis. For example, the test manager at the IT services business also reported a large increase in automation, moving from only manual testing with 10% to 20% test case coverage to 80% test case coverage with automation. The agile coach at the insurance organization also noted a sizable improvement to automation, raising average SAP automation rates from 10% to 50%. However, some teams achieved automation rates of 80% to 90%. Interviewees attributed these improvements to the solution’s no-code, model-based automation, which negates the need for technical skills to directly create automation, its single interface for automation across multiple platforms and systems, and its tight integration with SAP. With the introduction of model-based, no-code automated testing, the interviewees said their organizations reduced their need for skilled developers to focus on coding and programing testing automation scripts. They then began to reallocate their skilled developer resources from testing teams to higher value and higher impact development work. The agile coach at the insurance organization noted, “We’ll reduce resources by 30%, but it will be much higher for some divisions.” Reducing the number of more expensive resources on the testing team also reduced overall testing team costs. Automation also enabled the interviewees’ organizations to minimize errors or incidents that made it into production. Interviewees shared that they were able to limit bugs that made it into production by between 70% and 93%, depending on the type of bug and amount of automation. The data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications organization noted: “SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis allows us to catch bugs within days instead of weeks, reducing the added, higher costs of bug fixing once in production. … We modeled a bug and found that, for 10,000 customers, that billing bug would cost $350,000.” The SAP test manager from the energy company shared: “Finding a defect in code could delay a release. If we didn’t have automated regression test conditions, not much would get done to ensure bugs don’t go into production.” The senior test manager from the CPG organization reported, “We detect defects every 10 minutes.” Interviewees who had invested in an automated application testing solution prior to SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis were able to decommission these solutions. In doing so, these firms saved an approximate $80,000 annually on licensing costs and reallocated the resource responsible for managing that solution to SAP enterprise application QA Solutions by Tricentis as a whole, incurring no net additional ongoing management costs. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The cost savings from SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.7 million. 90%Automated test coverage 93%Reduction in production errors from automation Cost Savings From Process Automation, Fewer Production Errors, And Decommissioned Technology
SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing By Tricentis: Improved Business Value From Reduced Time-To-Release And Increased Application Release RateEvidence and data. The increase in automated testing from SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis not only reduced costs associated with manual testing and less efficient automated testing solutions, but also enabled the organizations to increase their rates of application releases. When testing professionals saw reduced testing times while simultaneously reducing production incidents, they made the case internally to move toward continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) practices, improving rates of release and increasing the business value of testing. The test manager of the IT services firm shared that they ran 15,000 test cases in 20 hours, while the senior director of engineering at the retail firm shared that they executed critical process testing daily, and regular testing weekly. Similarly, the agile coach at the insurance firm noted that they were releasing applications every two weeks, while the data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications firm noted that they were now updating their applications monthly instead of quarterly. In terms of regression testing, the senior test manager from the CPG firm noted that their regression cycles were becoming more frequent, from weekly to daily. Meanwhile, the agile coach at the insurance firm noted their regression cycles moved from biweekly to daily. Similarly, the data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications firm noted a reduction from six weeks to less than two days in their regression cycles. By improving their release rates, the interviewees were able to deliver necessary functionality updates to end users faster, improving the time-to-value of each release. The data and analytics transformation lead at the telecommunications organization explained: “More frequent updates mean the software becomes more reliable. New features can be accessed, old features can be accessed faster, features are enhanced to provide more value, etc. All of these increase our employee productivity, not to mention our internal Net Promoter Score℠ (NPS).2” Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The business value gained from SAP Enterprise Continuous Testing by Tricentis will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 25%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $7.8 million. 83%Reduction in time to release 500%Increase in rate of release Improved Business Value From Reduced Time-To-Release And Increased Application Release Rate
SAP Enterprise Performance Testing By Tricentis: Cost Savings From Reduced Performance Testing Cycles And Hypercare CostsEvidence and data. SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis enables organizations to ensure that their applications will still meet performance, capacity, and usage requirements under heavy user loads. Interviewees noted that leveraging the solution enabled their organizations to save on costs associated with performance test maintenance, increase the frequency of performance test case execution, improve coverage of systems tested, and further reduce the costs of hypercare. Interviewees shared that performance test automation enabled their organizations to reduce the time and cost of performance test maintenance. Interviewees noted that before adopting SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis, they had to spend approximately 20 person-days on test maintenance for each quarterly test set execution. With the solution, the time-to-execute test maintenance duration was reduced to between 30 minutes and one hour, depending on the load, achieving a total reduction of between 99.4% and 99.7%. As test set maintenance time decreased, organizations were able to execute their performance test cases more frequently. Before, organizations were executing performance tests once every quarter. After, these organizations were able to execute performance tests once or twice a week, increasing the rate of performance testing between 12.5 times and 25 times. Organizations improved their performance testing frequency while also improving the number of systems tested from one to seven. By improving their test maintenance time and test frequency, organizations further reduced their costs of hypercare. In fact, the test manager from the IT services industry reported that the organization was able to eliminate hypercare entirely. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The value gained from SAP Enterprise Performance Testing by Tricentis will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $567,000. 99%Reduction in performance testing costs 1,150%Increase in performance testing frequency 45%Further reduction to hypercare costs 90%Total reduction to hypercare costs from SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis Cost Savings From Reduced Performance Testing Cycles And Hypercare Costs
Unquantified BenefitsInterviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
FlexibilityThe value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach). Analysis Of CostsQuantified cost data as applied to the compositeTotal Costs
Licensing CostsEvidence and data. SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis are priced as follows:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Licensing costs will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million. Licensing Costs
Implementation And Deployment CostsEvidence and data. Although the interviewees typically opted to utilize implementation services provided by SAP and Tricentis, they also incurred internal time costs to help implement and deploy the automated testing solutions alongside the professional services teams. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The total cost of implementation and deployment will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV of $ $254,000. Implementation And Deployment Costs
Training And Ongoing Management CostsEvidence and data. The interviewees also shared that their organizations incurred both training and ongoing management costs associated with their investment in SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis. The interviewees reported that training required about four days for each professional tester. Ongoing management costs varied by the number of solutions and number of professional testers and ranged between 0.15 and 0.35 FTEs per solution. Ongoing management activities included issue and environment management, as well as long-term strategy and planning. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The cost of training and ongoing management will vary with:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $363,000. Training And Ongoing Management Costs
Financial SummaryConsolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted MetricsCash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs
Total benefits
Cumulative net benefits
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
Please NoteThe financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis. These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section. The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur. From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis. The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis can have on an organization. Due DiligenceInterviewed SAP and Tricentis stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to SAP enterprise application quality assurance solutions by Tricentis. InterviewsInterviewed six decision-makers at organizations using SAP enterprise application QA solutions by Tricentis to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks. Composite OrganizationDesigned a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations. Financial Model FrameworkConstructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees. Case StudyEmployed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology. Total Economic Impact ApproachBenefitsBenefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization. CostsCosts comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution. FlexibilityFlexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated. RisksRisks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.” Financial TerminologyPresent value (PV)The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows. Net present value (NPV)The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs. Return on investment (ROI)A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs. Discount rateThe interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%. PaybackThe breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost. Appendix ATotal Economic ImpactTotal Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. Appendix BEndnotes1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. 2 Net Promoter and NPS are registered service marks, and Net Promoter Score is a service mark, of Bain & Company, Inc., Satmetrix Systems, Inc., and Fred Reichheld. DisclosuresReaders should be aware of the following: This study is commissioned by SAP and Tricentis and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis. Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance solutions by Tricentis. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance solutions by Tricentis based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse SAP or Tricentis or their offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, SAP,Tricentis, and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and SAP and Tricentis make no warranties of any kind. SAP and Tricentis reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study. SAP and Tricentis provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews. Consulting Team:Nick Mayberry PublishedMarch 2026 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Total Economic Impact™ Of SAP Enterprise Application Quality Assurance Solutions By Tricentis.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html