Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of KIBO Order Management

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By KIBO Order Management

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY KIBO, October 2025

[CONTENT]

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of KIBO Order Management

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By KIBO Order Management

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY KIBO, October 2025

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

The rapid growth and increasing complexity of omnichannel commerce have intensified the need for seamless order management across diverse sales channels. To stay competitive, businesses must achieve real-time inventory visibility and intelligent order routing to optimize fulfillment and deliver exceptional customer experiences. Modern, microservices-based, and microservices, API-first, cloud-native, and headless architecture (MACH)-certified,  order management solutions (OMS) offer the flexibility and scalability needed to evolve at a sustainable pace, enabling organizations to adopt new capabilities and customize systems to meet their unique operational requirements — without major disruptions.

KIBO Order Management is a modern, cloud-native, and modular SaaS platform designed to help retailers and brands unify and streamline omnichannel order fulfillment. It offers real-time inventory visibility across all channels and locations, intelligent order routing based on customizable business rules, and flexible workflows to optimize fulfillment methods like buy online, pickup in-store (BOPIS), curbside pickup, drop-shipping, and returns. KIBO Order Management’s AI agents automate and optimize a wide range of tasks, from customer service and order routing to returns, forecasting, and analytics. Its microservices-based, headless architecture enables integration, scalability, and deployment, allowing businesses to adapt quickly to changing market demands while enhancing customer service through a comprehensive view of orders, inventory, and customer data.

KIBO commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Order Management.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of KIBO Order Management on their organizations.

167%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$8.0M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six decision-makers from four organizations with experience using KIBO Order Management. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a global specialty retail organization with $1 billion in annual revenue, 20% of which is derived from e-commerce.

Interviewees said prior to choosing KIBO Order Management, their organizations faced a range of supply chain challenges that hindered operational efficiency and customer satisfaction, including limited inventory visibility and inefficient order routing. Legacy OMS platforms and homegrown solutions were not scalable or adaptable to their needs and were expensive and complex to maintain. Legacy platforms lacked real-time analytics, making it hard for the organizations to track performance and optimize operations. Multiple systems created confusion for customer service teams and inaccurate or delayed inventory data led to order cancellations. Limited fulfillment options also contributed to subpar customer experiences.

After implementing KIBO Order Management, interviewees’ organizations improved fulfillment efficiency through automation and revamped workflows, resulting in faster shipping and reduced labor costs. The KIBO platform also enabled new omnichannel fulfillment models like ship-from-store and BOPIS, boosting customer retention and generating incremental profit. Furthermore, retiring the legacy system cut licensing and maintenance expenses, resulting in additional cost savings. Overall, KIBO Order Management delivered strong financial and operational benefits across fulfillment, revenue growth, and IT efficiency.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Fulfillment productivity gains. After adopting KIBO Order Management, the composite organization streamlines its order fulfillment processes, which allows teams to fulfill thousands of orders more efficiently. Automation of order routing and fulfillment logic eliminate manual processes, resulting in faster shipping times and reduced labor costs. Improved inventory visibility through a unified platform further simplifies customer service workflows. These changes save the composite organization $4.1 million over three years.

  • Incremental profit from KIBO OMS. The composite organization unlocks new revenue streams and growth opportunities after implementing KIBO Order Management. The platform supports the launch of new omnichannel fulfillment models like ship-from-store and BOPIS, which help increase average order value and customer retention and allows the composite organization to introduce dynamic bundling of products and services, which creates upsell opportunities. Overall, these enhancements contribute incremental profit worth $6.5 million to the organization over three years.

  • Cost savings from retiring legacy solution. The composite organization retires its legacy platform after deploying KIBO Order Management, eliminating high licensing fees and infrastructure costs and reducing maintenance costs. These efficiencies enabled the composite organization to save $2.2 million over three years.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • A unified platform. KIBO Order Management provides a single interface that consolidates order management, inventory visibility, and fulfillment logic, which improved operational efficiency and customer service for the composite organization. KIBO’s foundation on a single data model for all order, inventory, and customer data further streamlines the composite’s operations and ensures data consistency across the platform.

  • Improved UX. The platform simplifies complex tasks for the composite, such as order fulfillment and administrative updates, by consolidating everything into a single system. Store associates, merchandisers, and customer service teams find it easier to manage orders, pricing, and inventory without needing to switch between multiple systems, and administrative tools allow for quick modifications across promotions, products, and store settings.

  • Reliability. The composite organization finds that the KIBO platform is stable, rarely experiences outages, and performs consistently even during high-traffic events like Black Friday and Cyber Monday, and KIBO’s feature releases do not disrupt existing functionality. This reliability gives the technical team peace of mind, allowing them to focus on growth and innovation rather than troubleshooting.

  • Ease of integration and extensibility. The KIBO platform’s API-first architecture enables integration with other systems and allows for rapid customization and enhancements, even in highly complex business models with thousands of independently priced stores.

  • Ease of making customizations. KIBO’s interface, API-first architecture, and microservice framework help the composite organization’s developers customize the KIBO platform. These features allow the composite organization to continuously improve its operations, building custom user interfaces and integrating new capabilities without heavy reliance on technical staff or long development cycles.

  • Improved insights. The composite organization values the improved business insights gained through KIBO Order Management, particularly its ability to centralize and simplify access to data across channels. With KIBO, the composite organization can track customer behavior, order flows, and inventory availability in real time, enabling more informed decision-making and strategic planning.

  • Improved KPIs. The composite organization experiences improvements in key performance indicators (KPIs) after adopting KIBO Order Management, including faster order fulfillment, higher average order values (AOV), and improved fraud detection through real-time alerts and work queues. The platform also enables better inventory and delivery date accuracy and reduces post-checkout cancellations, contributing to enhanced customer satisfaction.

  • KIBO relationship. Business and technical leaders in the composite organization value their relationships with the KIBO team for being collaborative, responsive, and engaged, and especially appreciate KIBO’s regular touchpoints, such as weekly operational check-ins, quarterly business reviews, annual summits, and roadmap discussions.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Planning and implementation. The composite organization spends the equivalent of 50% of 12 IT and business FTEs’ time over six months to plan and implement the KIBO Order Management platform for production. The composite organization also contracts with a KIBO implementation partner to help plan and oversee the initial deployment. These activities cost the composite organization $880,000.

  • Ongoing maintenance. Three IT staff members manage and maintain the KIBO Order Management platform on an ongoing basis. The composite organization also contracts with a KIBO implementation partner to help plan and deploy new features and integrations. These activities cost the composite organization $1.5 million over three years.

  • KIBO licensing. The composite organization sends 13 million orders through the KIBO platform over the first three years, which costs the organization $2.0 million over that time.

  • Training and change management. Distribution center workers, store associates, and merchandisers receive varying amounts of training on the KIBO Order Management platform depending on their role and how deeply they interact with the system. These activities cost the organization $391,000 over three years.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $12.8 million over three years versus costs of $4.8 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $8.0 million and an ROI of 167%.

“It marked the beginning of the migration from the platform that is not going to grow with our company … into one that will grow with us into the future.”

Chief information officer, luxury goods

Key Statistics

167%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$12.8M

Benefits PV 

$8.0M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Fulfillment productivity gains Incremental profit from KIBO OMS Cost savings from retiring legacy solution

To see the full study, please register below.

The KIBO Order Management Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the KIBO Order Management investment
Interviews
Role Industry Region Revenue
Director of enterprise systems and PMO Apparel Global $100 million to $250 million
Chief information officer Luxury goods Global $250 million to $500 million
Director of omnichannel marketing
Director of IT for e-commerce
Home improvement and hardware North America $1 billion to $5 billion
Chief digital officer
Manager of e-commerce operations
Retail cooperative Global $5 billion to $10 billion
Key Challenges

Interviewees said prior to choosing KIBO Order Management, their organizations faced a range of supply chain challenges with legacy OMS platforms that were not scalable or adaptable to their needs and were expensive and complex to maintain. Multiple systems created confusion for their customer service teams and inaccurate or delayed inventory data led to order cancellations. Limited fulfillment options also contributed to subpar customer experience. Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Supply chain issues. Before implementing KIBO Order Management, interviewees’ organizations faced a range of supply chain challenges that hindered operational efficiency and customer satisfaction. Many struggled with limited inventory visibility, leading to frequent stockouts and order cancellations, as well as an inability to provide accurate delivery promises. Order routing was largely manual and inefficient, lacking automation and real-time decision-making. Additionally, interviewees said that fragmented systems across e-commerce, OMS, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms created silos, making it difficult to coordinate inventory and fulfillment across channels. These issues were compounded by a lack of real-time data and analytics, which prevented agile responses to demand fluctuations and fulfillment performance tracking. The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer noted: “Getting data in formats that we needed to do the level of analytics was a challenge. We’re extremely analytics focused.”

  • Complex pricing and store models. Two of the interviewees stated that their organizations had federated sales models with complex pricing structures featuring corporate, zoned, and store-specific pricing variations supporting thousands of stores with tens of thousands of SKUs. Store owners were allowed to override pricing, leading to unique pricing per item per store. These interviewees’ organizations needed an order management system that could handle this dynamic pricing complexity to support independent store ownership.
    The director of omnichannel marketing at a home improvement and hardware retailer explained: “We have 1,100 stores across 60,000 SKUs [plus] three different variations of zoned pricing across six price zones. … In addition to that, our store owners can do price overrides, so you can essentially have every item priced completely uniquely across the country.”

  • Limited legacy OMS platforms and homegrown solutions were expensive and complex to maintain. Legacy systems at the interviewees’ organizations were expensive to maintain and required specialized staff. Many were not scalable or adaptable to modern e-commerce needs. For example, some interviewees noted their legacy systems couldn’t support dynamic pricing, regional variations, or new omnichannel fulfillment models like BOPIS or ship-to-home, and it was difficult to integrate them with other tools to provide these capabilities. The legacy platforms also lacked real-time analytics, making it hard for the interviewees’ organizations to track performance and optimize operations. The manual workflows and outdated logic associated with these platforms slowed down fulfillment and increased labor costs.
    The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer noted: “[The legacy platform] was a framework that was no longer scalable, no longer adaptable, not as flexible as we would need it. We live in a world of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. We needed a core infrastructure that’s able to work within that context.” The interviewee added: “It was quite cost prohibitive because the cost of the expertise in terms of software engineers is a premium. Most of those people are thinking about retirement. I saw that as not only an emerging risk but also an inherent risk to the operations of our company.”

  • Customer experience gaps. Interviewees said multiple systems created confusion for customer service teams and inconsistent experiences for shoppers. Inaccurate or delayed inventory data led to order cancellations. Limited fulfillment options also contributed to subpar customer experience. The director of enterprise systems and PMO at an apparel retailer noted: “Each company had their own instance of [an e-commerce front-end]. We needed an OMS that would allow us to go into one tool to manage the order, not go through seven sites which would make it complicated as you do the whole omnichannel thing.”

Solution Requirements

The interviewees searched for a solution that could deliver:

  • Digital transformation with increased business agility. Interviewees’ organizations looked for modern, scalable infrastructure with the breadth and depth of out-of-the-box OMS capabilities that could scale to support future growth and innovation aligned with their broader digital and omnichannel strategies. API-first architecture would ensure transparency and extensibility, empowering their business users to make changes without heavy IT involvement to enable rapid deployment of capabilities to support new fulfillment models (e.g., ship-to-home, BOPIS, ship-from-store) and flexible pricing strategies, including regional and store-specific pricing catalogs and the accommodation of B2C and B2B pricing models.
    The chief digital officer at a retail cooperative explained: “One of the things we’ve worked very hard on for our fulfillment solution is to follow the customer path, going from a static storefront with just products and one solution to fulfill to dynamic product loading, dynamic pricing, and multiple fulfillment options so you really cater to the customer and give them whatever their best path is. Some people want it immediately, so speed is the priority. Others don’t care or can wait, so they can specify that they want it delivered on Saturday. All of that needs to happen behind the scenes, which is a heavy lift.”
    The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer explained: “What was important for me was to find a partner — not a vendor but a partner who has an architecture that is API-first at its core, that is open, that uses the very APIs that it exposes to us internally. … Architecturally, [KIBO OMS] checked all the boxes.”

  • Reduced TCO and improved ROI. Interviewees said their organizations sought to replace their legacy systems with a more cost-effective solution that had lower total cost of ownership, including licensing, staffing, and maintenance, making a tightly integrated platform combining e-commerce and OMS capabilities attractive. By consolidating multiple systems into a single, more manageable platform for order management and providing one business-friendly interface for customer service and operations teams to manage orders across regions, the interviewees’ organizations could further simplify and save on operational costs.
    The director of enterprise systems and PMO at an apparel retailer said: “We went through an acquisition period where [our parent company] bought a lot of other companies with different product lines, and the idea was to have an omnichannel view of all the companies. We signed on with [the legacy platform] as our primary toolset four years ago but later they started getting rid of the companies they purchased, and it got to the point where it was primarily [our business] inside the [legacy platform] tools. As contract renewals were coming up in early 2024, the price for renewal was much too high for us given the volume of orders that flow through a website or a store. We felt we should look at other competing OMS systems out there that would allow us to get a lower cost for software licensing and implementation.”

  • Strong vendor relationship. The interviewees told Forrester they preferred to work with partners who were accessible, flexible, and responsive — especially those that provided the opportunity to collaborate, including influence over the partner’s product roadmap. The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer explained: “The references and the meetings we had with their clients lined up with what we were looking for, what we wanted to hear. There’s also the soft side of it, the relationship, access to the chief executive and their team. We have developed a very tight relationship where we’re very close. ... We were together just last week, looking at their roadmap and my roadmap. ... That was very important to me. The relationship, accessibility, flexibility, and willingness to shape their roadmap as a function of what we’re looking for meant a lot in the selection process.”

“They were priced competitively. That was one piece that was really important. We liked the fact that they had both products — OMS and e-commerce — and they’re very collaborative.”

Manager of e-commerce operations, retail cooperative

“The digital solution certainly is an e-commerce propeller, which is one of the primary benefits, but it’s really about the platform for your business and brand. That is the way to think about it.”

Chief digital officer, retail cooperative

“We moved our order management component first because it is the heart and soul of everything that happens in our organization. Every order agnostic to channel must find its way in the OMS.”

Chief information officer, luxury goods

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a global specialty retailer headquartered in the US with $1 billion in annual revenue, 20% of which is derived from e-commerce. It operates 500 stores with 10,000 employees and has five distribution centers with 250 employees. Annual order volume is 5 million records with an average order value of $200. The composite has 200 customer service representatives assisting customers with orders and 50 merchandisers monitor and manage inventory and pricing for B2C and “pro” B2B customers. Prior to implementing KIBO Order Management, the composite organization relied on an older on-premises solution which lacked omnichannel capabilities and was difficult to maintain.

  • Deployment characteristics. After selecting KIBO Order Management, the composite organization takes six months to deploy the solution, migrate relevant order data from the legacy system to the new system, and train different groups of users on the new system. The implementation includes all geographies and channels.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $1 billion in annual revenue; 20% derived from e-commerce

  • 5 million record order volume

  • $200 average order value

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Fulfillment productivity gains $1,014,750 $2,029,500 $2,029,500 $5,073,750 $4,124,566
Btr Incremental profit from KIBO OMS $1,820,000 $2,969,220 $3,178,816 $7,968,036 $6,496,738
Ctr Cost savings from retiring legacy solution $544,000 $1,088,000 $1,088,000 $2,720,000 $2,211,150
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $3,378,750 $6,086,720 $6,296,316 $15,761,786 $12,832,454
Fulfillment Productivity Gains

Evidence and data. Interviewees said their organizations achieved notable improvements in fulfillment productivity after transitioning to KIBO’s OMS, including reducing in time-to-ship and streamlining order processing which allowed teams to fulfill thousands of orders more efficiently. The interviewees reported lower labor costs and reduced headcount in fulfillment operations, not as a cost-cutting measure but because of increased efficiency. The centralized platform enabled faster access to order data, simplified customer service workflows, and improved inventory visibility across regions. Interviewees also noted that the automation of order routing and fulfillment logic helped eliminate manual processes and enhanced responsiveness to customer needs. These gains supported expansion into new fulfillment models, such as ship-from-store and international shipping, while maintaining system reliability and scalability.

  • The director of enterprise systems and PMO at an apparel retailer described how KIBO Order Management streamlined their operations: “Just making it easier to maintain orders is one of the biggest pieces so far. There’s one interface, just one place to look. My customer care team doesn’t need to think about which website the order came from.”

  • The director of omnichannel marketing at a home improvement and hardware retailer noted similar productivity gains: “It streamlined things. It made it easier. The fulfillment interface was much easier for dealers.”

  • For the chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer, increased efficiency was a critical factor that KIBO delivered on: “These last four years were the best four years in all the time that this company has been around. ... To be able to fulfill orders at the rate that the digital store is sending them through, that’s where if you don’t have an efficient OMS, it becomes the clog, doesn’t it? Our mean time to ship is 0.18 day. We’re talking within an hour of getting an order, it’s gone. We’ve processed 188,000 orders. They’re not sitting around here anymore.”
    This interviewee also stressed: “Our head count is not a leading indicator of value in our investment in KIBO. It’s the number of orders we’re pushing through that have been completed. It is the number of orders that were flagged as fraudulent that might have gone through. It is the access to information that then turns into tactical and strategic marketing initiatives. It is the ability to reduce the time it takes to connect a new line of business like international, and to do that in 30 days. Those were the criteria, and we’ve hit the mark.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization operates 500 stores with 10,000 employees and has 250 total employees at five distribution centers.

  • The composite organization retires the legacy platform halfway through Year 1. In Years 2 and 3, 100% of orders are processed through the KIBO OMS.

  • After deploying KIBO OMS, the efficiencies increased by 5% driven by streamlined and automated order management processes and optimized shipping between stores and distribution centers. Twenty percent of this improvement is attributed to KIBO.

  • Of the time saved, 50% is recaptured for additional task work.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for both store associates and distribution center workers is $55,000.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Organizational differences that may impact fulfillment productivity gains include:

  • The compensation of store associates and distribution center workers and their prior state of efficiency.

  • The organization’s ability to optimize its workflows to take advantage of KIBO OMS features and functionality to the greatest effect.

  • Other investments made outside the KIBO platform to improve order fulfillment workflows.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.1 million.

About 400 FTEs

Equivalent fulfillment time savings over three years

“Our labor costs have gone down. Our head counts have gone down on the fulfilment side. But that wasn’t our goal. Our level of efficiency has gone up.”

Chief information officer, luxury goods

Fulfillment Productivity Gains
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Store associates and distribution center workers (FTEs) Composite 10,250 10,250 10,250
A2 Hours worked by store associates and distribution center workers A1*2,080*80% 17,056,000 17,056,000 17,056,000
A3 Percentage of orders processed through KIBO OMS Interviews 50% 100% 100%
A4 Percentage of time saved from streamlined order management and optimized shipping between stores and distribution centers Interviews 5% 5% 5%
A5 Percentage of efficiency gains attributed to KIBO OMS Interviews 20% 20% 20%
A6 Hours saved by optimized shipping between stores and distribution centers attributed to KIBO OMS A2*A3*A4*A5 85,280 170,560 170,560
A7 Fully burdened annual salary for both a store associate and a distribution center worker Composite $55,000 $55,000 $55,000
A8 Percentage of time recaptured TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
At Fulfillment productivity gains A6*A7*A8/2,080 $1,127,500 $2,255,000 $2,255,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Atr Fulfillment productivity gains (risk-adjusted)   $1,014,750 $2,029,500 $2,029,500
Three-year total: $5,073,750 Three-year present value: $4,124,566
Incremental Profit From KIBO OMS

Evidence and data. Interviewees said their organizations unlocked several new revenue streams and growth opportunities after implementing KIBO OMS. The platform enabled rapid expansion into international markets for the interviewees’ organizations. It also supported the launch of new omnichannel fulfillment models like ship-from-store and BOPIS, which helped increase average order value and customer retention for these organizations. The system’s flexibility allowed the interviewees’ businesses to introduce dynamic bundling of products and services, creating upselling opportunities. Additionally, improved inventory visibility and unified data across channels empowered some interviewees’ organizations to identify underserved markets and optimize real estate strategies, further driving incremental revenue.

  • The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer explained: “[KIBO Order Management] has set us up to go into lines of business that we hadn’t thought of before because we’re interfacing with an architecture that invites creativity. We went from not shipping internationally, not allowing you to shop internationally, fulfilling internationally to doing all of that in 35 days. We’ve gone from taking zero international orders to several hundred. We have easily tripled our customer base on our dot-com, which has a direct link into that OMS because that’s the channel that’s constantly depending on it.”
    This interviewee also described how analytics from KIBO helped drive their geographic expansion: “For years, we only sold in the South/Mid-Atlantic/SE region, but our dot-com was shipping all over the country. Now that we have all that data together, we were able to see clusters of sales in Southern California and in Washington state, and we realized we need to be more creative with our real estate strategy. I can’t quantify [how KIBO affected] that outcome but qualitatively, it has put us in a position to compete, to redefine the geographies in which we compete.”

  • The chief digital officer at a retail cooperative also used analytics from KIBO and other sources to measure the total omnichannel effect: “We measure what’s coming through the app, through the cloud. Because of the nature of our business, with so many stores close to people’s homes, we measure activity to determine the offline effect, e-commerce plus in-store sales, where we know the consumer visited the website and later came to the store to make the purchase. We match their records up through their loyalty number to see that they looked at a particular product online and days later we saw them in a store, and they bought the product.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Before investing in KIBO, the composite organization has an annual order volume of 5 million records with an average order value of $200. The organization’s net profit margin is 5%.

  • After deploying KIBO OMS, average order value increases by 2% and order volume increases by 5%, driven by the launch of new fulfillment models, dynamic bundling of products and services, and improved inventory visibility across channels.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Organizational differences that may impact incremental profit from omnichannel fulfillment include:

  • The organization’s order volume, average order value, and operating margin.

  • The organization’s ability to implement and refine new omnichannel fulfillment options and features such as dynamic bundling and pricing to improve shoppers’ experiences to the greatest effect.

  • Other pricing, inventory mix, and marketing investments made outside the KIBO platform to optimize revenues across all sales channels.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6.5 million.

$199.2M

Incremental revenue over three years

“The e-commerce business will do over $500 million this year but the total omnichannel number is $2.5 billion. … Digital is one of, if not the top, growth engine for the company.”

Chief digital officer, retail cooperative

Incremental Profit From KIBO OMS
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Average order value (AOV) Composite $200.00 $204.00 $208.00
B2 Percentage increase in AOV after adopting KIBO OMS Interviews 2% 2% 2%
B3 Incremental revenue per order after adopting KIBO OMS B1*B2 $4.00 $4.08 $4.16
B4 Annual order volume Composite 5,000,000 5,125,000 5,381,250
B5 Percentage of orders processed through KIBO OMS Composite 50% 100% 100%
B6 Percentage increase in order volume after moving to KIBO OMS Interviews 5% 5% 5%
B7 Incremental orders after adopting KIBO OMS B4*B5*B6 125,000 256,250 269,063
B8 Incremental revenue from increased AOV B3*B4 $20,000,000 $20,910,000 $22,386,000
B9 Incremental revenue from increased order volume (B1+B3)*B7 $25,500,000 $53,320,500 $57,084,406
B10 Subtotal: Incremental revenue B8+B9 $45,500,000 $74,230,500 $79,470,406
B11 Net profit margin Composite 5% 5% 5%
Bt Incremental profit from KIBO OMS B10*B11 $2,275,000 $3,711,525 $3,973,520
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Btr Incremental profit from KIBO OMS (risk-adjusted)   $1,820,000 $2,969,220 $3,178,816
Three-year total: $7,968,036 Three-year present value: $6,496,738
Cost Savings From Retiring Legacy Solution

Evidence and data. Some interviewees reported notable cost savings by retiring their legacy platforms. These savings stemmed from eliminating high licensing fees and infrastructure costs; for instance, one interviewee said their organization reduced annual costs by switching from enterprise-grade solutions to KIBO and its integration partner. According to interviewees, maintenance costs also dropped markedly as KIBO’s interface allowed internal teams to manage configurations and workflows without relying on expensive, specialized staff. Additionally, the unified platform reduced the interviewees’ organizations’ need for multiple systems and integrations, streamlining operations and lowering total cost of ownership. These efficiencies enabled these organizations to reallocate resources, reduce technical debt, and scale more affordably.

  • The director of enterprise systems and PMO at an apparel retailer said: “The renewal for [our legacy OMS and integration system] was probably around $2 million a year. For KIBO and [our current integration system] it was [less].”

  • The interviewee added that their organization also saved on system maintenance and upkeep: “I can go into KIBO routing right now and very easily make changes and I understand them. For [our legacy platform], it took a bit longer and we had to have folks on staff to support it who had been working on it for a long time and knew how to work it.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The legacy OMS platform costs the composite organization $350,000 annually, including third-party and homegrown add-ons.

  • Six IT staff members are required to manage and maintain the legacy ecosystem.

  • The composite organization moves off the legacy platform halfway through Year 1. In Years 2 and 3, 100% of orders are processed through the KIBO OMS.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for IT staff members is $155,000.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Organizational differences that may impact cost savings from retiring legacy solutions include:

  • The cost of the prior OMS platform, including third-party and homegrown add-ons.

  • The skills and amount of upkeep required to maintain the legacy platform and prevailing local compensation rates for the team responsible for maintenance.

  • The amount of time taken to sunset the legacy solution.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.2 million.

$2.2M

Cost savings from retiring legacy solution over three years

“We’re very satisfied because we’ve moved on from that OMS now and we’re peeling off several other things off the [legacy platform], having done the big one first.”

Chief information officer, luxury goods

Cost Savings From Retiring Legacy Solution
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Legacy OMS solution licensing and infrastructure costs Composite $350,000 $350,000 $350,000
C2 IT staff responsible for legacy solution maintenance (FTEs) Interviews 6 6 6
C3 Fully burdened annual salary for an IT staff member Composite $155,000 $155,000 $155,000
C4 Cost of maintaining legacy solution C1+(C2*C3) $1,280,000 $1,280,000 $1,280,000
C5 Reduction in use of legacy solution Interviews 50% 100% 100%
Ct Cost savings from retiring legacy solution C4*C5 $640,000 $1,280,000 $1,280,000
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Ctr Cost savings from retiring legacy solution (risk-adjusted)   $544,000 $1,088,000 $1,088,000
Three-year total: $2,720,000 Three-year present value: $2,211,150
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • A unified platform. The interviewees appreciated having a single, intuitive interface that consolidated order management, inventory visibility, and fulfillment logic, which improved operational efficiency and customer service. They noted that KIBO’s foundation on a single data model for all order, inventory, and customer data further streamlined operations and ensured data consistency across the platform. The director of enterprise systems and PMO at an apparel retailer said: “Just making it easier to maintain orders is one of the biggest pieces so far. There’s one interface, just one place to look. My customer care team doesn’t need to think about which website the order came from. They can just go into KIBO, search for it, and the order comes up in their system, and they can maintain things within that tool. ... That, to me, is one of the biggest gains from using KIBO’s order management system.”

  • Improved UX. Interviewees said their users appreciated KIBO’s clean, intuitive, and easy-to-navigate interface. They highlighted how the platform simplified complex tasks, such as order fulfillment and administrative updates, by consolidating everything into a single, user-friendly system. Store associates and customer service teams found it easier to manage orders, pricing, and inventory without needing to switch between multiple systems. They also found that administrative tools allowed for quick modifications across promotions, products, and store settings, while the platform’s flexibility supported test-and-learn strategies and rapid iteration. According to the manager of e-commerce operations at a retail cooperative: “It’s pretty straightforward. The administrative tools allow you to modify most things that you see on the site. It’s great to have a tool that breaks everything out. It could be promotion related, product related, store related, pricing related. Anything that you need to do there, you can tweak from that administrative site.”
    The director of enterprise systems and PMO at an apparel retailer similarly remarked: “KIBO had a fresher look. Along with being able to see all of the opportunities we could have within the toolset, KIBO was more intuitive to maintain and manage. A lot of the configurations in the toolset we can easily enable.”

  • Reliability. The interviewees noted that the KIBO platform was stable, rarely experienced outages, and performed consistently even during high-traffic events like Black Friday and Cyber Monday. They appreciated that KIBO’s frequent feature releases do not disrupt existing functionality, which is not always the case with other vendors. This reliability gave teams peace of mind, allowing them to focus on growth and innovation rather than troubleshooting. According to the director of IT for e-commerce at a home improvement and hardware retailer: “They’re reliable. That’s the biggest thing. I never worry about the KIBO platform out of the entire e-commerce suite. I don’t worry. ... The biggest value for me is the reliability and stability of the platform.”

  • Ease of integration and extensibility. The KIBO platform’s API-first architecture enabled seamless integration with other systems at the interviewees’ organizations and allowed for rapid customization and enhancements, even in highly complex business models with thousands of independently priced stores. The manager of e-commerce operations at a retail cooperative told Forrester: “We use their APIs in everything that we do. Our system communicates with their system, and we get the most up-to-date information that we need there. We’ve integrated a lot of different pieces for a very complex business. I’ve worked in retail for 15 or more years and this is by far the most complex business model that I’ve ever worked with. ... KIBO can manage all that and do it in an easy way.”
    The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer explained how KIBO’s API-first framework allowed them to easily integrate with international shipping solutions: “This is all because of the API-first framework at its core. It is relatively seamless for us to follow this approach of having all of the best-in-class players connecting in because we’re handshaking through all of these open exposed APIs that are on the KIBO platform.”

  • Ease of making customizations. Interviewees appreciated how easy it was to make customizations to the KIBO platform, citing its intuitive interface, API-first architecture, and microservice framework as key enablers. These features allowed teams at the interviewees’ organizations to quickly implement changes, build custom user interfaces, and integrate new capabilities without heavy reliance on technical staff or long development cycles. Interviewees noted that the flexibility to plug in best-in-class solutions and the ability to iterate quickly — especially after peak periods — empowered their retailers to continuously improve their operations. The director of IT for e-commerce at a home improvement and hardware retailer told Forrester: “We used the KIBO microservice framework to build purpose-built UIs where stores can manage their own services and manage their hours, so productivity has gotten better at the stores. The stores definitely enjoy using the site. It makes their lives easier.”

  • Improved insights. Interviewees said their organizations valued the improved business insights gained through KIBO Order Management — particularly its ability to centralize and simplify access to data across channels. With KIBO, their retailers could easily track customer behavior, order flows, and inventory availability in real time, enabling more informed decision-making and strategic planning. Interviewees explained that the platform’s unified data structure allowed their businesses to analyze customer journeys, such as tracking purchases across online and in-store channels, and identify emerging market opportunities, such as geographic clusters of demand.
    The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer told Forrester that easy access to data was one of the most important benefits of the KIBO platform: “Easy access to data, data in a platform that is easily accessed ... I can’t tell you how important that is. We analyze everything. By having this rich amalgamation of data from all the channels in this one place, it becomes easy for us to pull and look at our business and do things like develop customer journey habits to understand a particular customer [behavior]. We couldn’t easily do that before. Now it’s a whole lot easier and we have become a very data-driven company. It’s huge and very important.”

  • Improved KPIs. Interviewees reported improvements in KPIs after adopting KIBO Order Management, including faster order fulfillment, higher AOV — in some cases doubling from previous benchmarks — and improved fraud detection through real-time alerts and work queues. The platform enabled better inventory accuracy and reduced post-checkout cancellations, contributing to enhanced customer satisfaction with the interviewees’ organizations. The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer said: “We’ve seen an increase in our AOV. Our AOV would have gone from an average of, just in gross terms, maybe $400 or $500 to easily $800 when you roll in the increase in the business from [specific brands] that we’re seeing.”

  • KIBO relationship. The interviewees valued their relationships with the KIBO team for being collaborative, responsive, and deeply engaged. Many described KIBO not just as a vendor but as a true partner, highlighting regular touchpoints such as weekly operational check-ins, quarterly business reviews, and roadmap discussions. This close engagement fostered trust and allowed their organizations to influence product development and receive tailored support. KIBO’s willingness to listen, adapt, and quickly resolve issues — often involving senior leadership — was seen as a major differentiator and KIBO’s proactive approach and commitment to customer success made them feel prioritized, especially compared to larger, less personal vendors. The director of IT for e-commerce at a home improvement and hardware retailer said: “They maintain a really close relationship with us. They meet with our operations manager every week to go through open tickets, go through site health, then we have quarterly QBRs with them and they take us through the road map. They ask us about how we’re doing, so it’s a very good relationship.”

“It would be very difficult for us to do digital commerce without a solution provider. They’ve made it very seamless and easy for us to transact online with customers. ... I could not imagine us doing this without [KIBO]. They are an invaluable partner.”

Manager of e-commerce operations, retail cooperative

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement KIBO Order Management and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Transforming workflows. Several interviewees noted that KIBO was a catalyst for broader digital transformation of their organizations’ operations. The platform enabled the automation of formerly internal processes and workflows and supported dynamic fulfillment strategies that the interviewees’ organizations weren’t able to achieve previously. The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer explained: “One of the main value propositions of going to an OMS of this sort is the ability to automate workflows. It exposed several internal workflows that are now going to become redundant and unnecessary. It also opened our eyes to the need for additional workflows that we hadn’t thought of before. You take some away and bring in new ones to drive efficiencies.”

  • Expanding use of KIBO functionality. The interviewees’ organizations were in different stages of leveraging KIBO’s features and functionality, with many planning to unlock more value from the platform over time. Some had just completed a basic migration, replicating existing workflows with minimal enhancements, while others were actively expanding into advanced capabilities like drop-shipping, ship-from-store, and B2B portals. A few were exploring headless commerce and deeper API integrations to support customer interfaces and dynamic fulfillment logic.
    The director of enterprise systems and PMO at an apparel retailer told Forrester: “Users definitely want to add things to the platform. Now that we’re past a holiday period, we can think about doing more with the platform and developing a deeper understanding of it. One initiative is enabling new third-party logistics functions to KIBO. We’re a small team supporting websites, warehouses, and stores. We can only concentrate on one thing that’s going to be our biggest project of the year but if it’s already in the platform, we can enable it very quickly.”
    The director of IT for e-commerce at a home improvement and hardware retailer noted: “We’ve only scratched the surface of some of the KIBO’s OMS features like ship from store. Some of our stores have said they want to be able to ship from their location, so adding packing stations and the ability to print labels to do that. A lot of our stores have their own vehicles to be able to deliver from their store. There’s definitely a lot of store-related features being asked for that we’re going to do in KIBO as well.”

  • Tapping other KIBO solutions. One interviewee shared that their organization had recently implemented other KIBO services beyond their OMS and e-commerce capabilities. The manager of e-commerce operations at a retail co-operative noted: “There’s a lot of functionality that they’ve implemented that we use. For instance, we recently rolled out subscriptions. KIBO offers a subscriptions option so customers can go on our website and sign up for a subscription, which isn’t something that we had in the past.”

  • Moving to modular OMS. Interviewees indicated that their organizations were exploring headless commerce by leveraging KIBO’s API-first architecture to decouple their front-end and back-end systems. This approach allowed them to build custom user interfaces, integrate best-in-class tools, and tailor digital experiences without being constrained by a monolithic platform. The manager of e-commerce operations at a retail co-operative told Forrester: “There’s a lot of flexibility. KIBO is working on a more headless platform, allowing us to use APIs for plug-ins instead of having to create everything. Making it flexible like that is going in the right direction.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

“[KIBO] has allowed us to extend our brand. It has allowed us to dream.”

Chief information officer, luxury goods

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Dtr Planning and implementation $879,750 $0 $0 $0 $879,750 $879,750
Etr Ongoing maintenance $0 $621,500 $621,500 $621,500 $1,864,500 $1,545,579
Ftr KIBO licensing $0 $472,500 $968,625 $1,017,056 $2,458,181 $1,994,191
Gtr Training and change management $0 $319,470 $63,296 $63,894 $446,660 $390,743
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $879,750 $1,413,470 $1,653,421 $1,702,450 $5,649,091 $4,810,263
Planning And Implementation

Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that deployments of KIBO OMS ranged from rapid lift-and-shift migrations completed in as little as 10 or 11 weeks to more complex, multiphase rollouts involving deep integration with existing infrastructure and business processes, spanning up to 14 months and often phased or paused to avoid peak sales periods.

Interviewees stated that projects often began with a clear understanding of business requirements and existing pain points. Some interviewees’ organizations leveraged prior documentation and requirements from legacy systems to accelerate the analysis phase, enabling faster decision-making and reducing ambiguity.

The interviewees’ organizations typically assembled cross-functional teams, including internal IT and business experts, external system integrators, and KIBO’s managed services. Project management emphasized rigorous testing and quality assurance, alongside change management efforts, such as training programs, documentation, and staged rollouts, to ensure user adoption.

  • The director of IT for e-commerce at a home improvement and hardware retailer recalled: “At the time, we were using KIBO’s managed services. They led the charge, so they were responsible for implementation. We augmented that managed services team with a partner, a systems integrator [SI].”

  • The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer explained that they spent most of their time on requirements for the new system, rewriting workflows to take advantage of automation: “We learned a lot about the importance of writing concise, unambiguous business requirements. We also understood and learned the importance of getting the right internal subject matter experts at the table as early as possible.”

  • This interviewee added: “For the implementation, there was well over 30 individuals composed of the KIBO team (their engineers, their architects, their project managers), their SI (same thing), my IT people — as well as my business experts — and then a bunch of third-party consultants who supported [the legacy platform]. The implementation timeline spanned about 17 months, because in our business, we only have nine months out of every year to work because of the holiday season. We froze everything in September and picked it up again in January and went live in October.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization spends the equivalent of 50% of 12 IT and business FTEs’ time over six months to plan and implement the KIBO OMS platform for production.

  • The composite organization also contracts with a KIBO implementation partner to help plan and oversee the initial deployment.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Organizational differences that may impact costs associated with planning and implementation include:

  • The state of preparedness of the organization prior to migrating to the KIBO OMS platform, including the need to revise workflows to take advantage of automation.

  • The efficiency of those involved in the planning and implementation process.

  • Scheduling considerations to avoid peak sales periods.

  • Prevailing local compensation rates for those involved in planning and implementing the KIBO OMS platform, including KIBO integration partners.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $880,000.

“Implementation was 10 to 11 weeks to migrate from [the legacy OMS] and fully implement KIBO OMS. It was a lift-and-shift of current capabilities onto the new platform and later expanded to include the new capabilities from KIBO OMS.”

Director of enterprise systems and PMO, apparel

Planning And Implementation
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Months required for planning and implementation for initial deployment Interviews 6      
D2 IT and business staff involved in planning and implementation Interviews 12      
D3 Percentage of time spent on planning and implementation Interviews 50%      
D4 Fully burdened annual salary for a staff member involved in planning and implementation Composite $155,000      
D5 Subtotal: Internal planning and implementation costs D1*D2*D3*D4/12 $465,000      
D6 Professional services for planning and implementation Interviews $300,000      
Dt Planning and implementation D5+D6 $765,000      
  Risk adjustment 15%        
Dtr Planning and implementation (risk-adjusted)   $879,750 $0 $0 $0
Three-year total: $879,750 Three-year present value: $879,750
Ongoing Maintenance

Evidence and data. The KIBO Order Management platform was maintained at the interviewees’ organizations with a focus on stability, scalability, and ease of use, enabling these organizations to concentrate resources on strategic growth rather than technical upkeep. Interviewees’ organizations typically allocated a small team to manage day-to-day support and configuration of KIBO Order Management. Maintenance was generally low touch due to the KIBO platform’s reliability and intuitive design, allowing teams to sleep well at night knowing the system runs smoothly. While order volumes varied, even during peak periods, interviewees reported that the system handled data flow efficiently with minimal disruptions.

Interviewees also stated that KIBO’s Post Go Live Support included an extensibility framework with public technical documentation. Customizations and feature development were typically managed by dedicated squads or external partners, with OMS-related development comprising a small fraction of overall digital efforts. Most changes at the interviewees’ organizations were configuration-based rather than requiring heavy development and when deeper work was needed, KIBO’s community of system integrators were engaged under flexible statements of work to assist with making changes.

  • The director of IT for e-commerce at a home improvement and hardware retailer described their ongoing maintenance effort as follows: “Our Ops Support team makes sure the site is up and running. That team is seven people plus a manager, so eight people. They handle the 24/7 operations of the site, both order management and e-commerce.”

  • The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer described a similar effort: “We allocated five internal IT team members, which took resources from our e-commerce tech team as well as our OMS support team. The rest of it were three consultants essentially assigned to us on a T&M basis with the SI. We’re pretty lean and trim.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Three IT staff members manage and maintain the KIBO OMS on an ongoing basis.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for IT staff members is $155,000.

  • The composite organization also contracts with a KIBO integration partner to help plan and deploy new features and integrations.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Organizational differences that may impact costs associated with ongoing maintenance include:

  • The scope, scale, and timing of feature enhancements and integrations made to the KIBO platform over time.

  • The efficiency and prevailing local compensation rates of those involved in supporting the KIBO platform on an ongoing basis, including KIBO integration partners.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.5 million.

“What I tell folks with the KIBO implementation is that I sleep well at night. Occasionally we may have a hiccup here or there and I reach out to KIBO, or they tell me something’s going on. It’s rare for the system to have an issue.”

Director of enterprise systems and PMO, apparel

Ongoing Maintenance
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 IT staff members responsible for ongoing maintenance Interviews   3 3 3
E2 Fully burdened annual salary for an IT staff member Composite   $155,000 $155,000 $155,000
E3 Subtotal: Internal ongoing maintenance cost E1*E2   $465,000 $465,000 $465,000
E4 Professional services on retainer for technical maintenance and enhancements Interviews   $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Et Ongoing maintenance E3+E4   $565,000 $565,000 $565,000
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Etr Ongoing maintenance (risk-adjusted)   $0 $621,500 $621,500 $621,500
Three-year total: $1,864,500 Three-year present value: $1,545,579
KIBO Licensing

Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that KIBO Order Management licensing was offered through annual contracts based on order lines. KIBO provided three different OMS packages — Starter, Essentials, and Advanced — that scaled with business needs and could be implemented all at once or phased in over time. Interviewees said that KIBO’s modular, composable architecture meant their license only had the features they needed, aligning licensing costs with actual usage and business complexity, from basic inventory and order processing to advanced capabilities like order routing, catalog management, subscriptions, and drop-shipping.

The interviewees generally viewed KIBO’s tiered licensing and pricing model as transparent, predictable, flexible, and cost-effective, especially when compared to legacy systems or enterprise platforms.

The director of IT for e-commerce at a home improvement and hardware retailer explained: “They used to have really massive gaps between their tiers, but they’ve given us more tiers since then so now when you get to the next tier, it isn’t a big jump. They’ve smoothed it out a little bit, so we’re really happy with them.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization starts with an annual order volume of 5,000,000 in Year 1, 50% of which is processed through KIBO Order Management.

  • In Year 2, the annual order volume grows to 5,125,000, all of which is processed through KIBO Order Management.

  • In Year 3, the annual order volume is 5,381,250, all of which is processed through KIBO Order Management.

  • The average number of order lines per order processed through KIBO Order Management is two.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Organizational differences that may impact costs associated with KIBO licensing include:

  • The license type and features selected.

  • The number of order lines processed through the KIBO OMS.

  • Global licensing agreements and other volume discounts. Contact KIBO for additional details.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.8 million.

“It’s tiered and we know where we are, which means we can see things coming. We can see where we’re bumping up on the top end of the tier. We can plan for that or even renegotiate because we can see it coming.”

Chief information officer, luxury goods

KIBO Licensing
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Annual order volume Composite   5,000,000 5,125,000 5,381,250
F2 Reduction in use of legacy solution Interviews   50% 100% 100%
F3 Volume of orders processed through KIBO OMS F1*F2   2,500,000 5,125,000 5,381,250
F4 Average order lines per order Composite   2 2 2
F5 Licensing fees Provided by KIBO   $450,000 $922,500 $968,625
Ft KIBO licensing F5   $450,000 $922,500 $968,625
  Risk adjustment 5%        
Ftr KIBO licensing (risk-adjusted)   $0 $472,500 $968,625 $1,017,056
Three-year total: $2,458,181 Three-year present value: $1,994,191
Training And Change Management

Evidence and data. Interviewees described a multilayered approach to training and change management. Teams leveraged KIBO Academy for foundational learning and supplemented it with internal documentation, videos, and SOPs tailored to their business processes. A train-the-trainer model and staged rollouts were commonly used across interviewees’ organizations, with dedicated champions or subject matter experts supporting store-level adoption and ongoing user education.

  • The chief information officer at a luxury goods retailer described their approach as follows: “We followed the old train-the-trainer approach. Several colleagues went through KIBO Academy. We also have our own academy with our own training protocol. We had a team that was focused on the rollout to the field, editing training manuals, policy documents, and protocols, and we established a special unit called Champs. The Champs team are the go-to subject matter experts for associates in the stores to use. We put all that in place and rolled it into our internal training protocol, which became part of the ongoing quarterly refresh training that goes on around here, especially since we’re constantly hiring people. It’s a retail business, so there’s always training going on. That’s how we solved the issue of building knowledge and building expertise.”

  • The chief digital officer at a retail cooperative emphasized the importance of change management: “Training and change management has to be a focal point with full buy-in from all parties. We hired a dedicated PMO [project management office] with an experienced project manager responsible for not just the technical documentation and Gantt charts, but also for training digital operators, merchants, and marketers. This wasn’t a 1- or 2-hour session — it was days, if not weeks of training, depending on the role. Whether loading products or prices or managing UX, each function required tailored instruction. It’s weeks of training, and that’s not counting the stores. You’re developing training modules and building videos, call centers, and help centers. It’s an incredibly daunting task — one that underscores the importance of having a flexible and expandable solution like KIBO.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In Year 1, 250 distribution center workers receive 2 hours of training related to KIBO OMS. In Years 2 and 3, 40 and 50 new joiners receive the same amount of training.

  • In Year 1, 10,000 store associates receive 1 hour of training related to KIBO OMS. In Years 2 and 3, 2,000 new joiners receive the same amount of training.

  • In Year 1, 50 merchandizers receive 4 hours of training related to KIBO OMS. In Years 2 and 3, 10 new joiners receive the same amount of training.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for both a distribution center worker and a store associate is $26.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for a merchandizer is $24.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Organizational differences that may impact costs associated with training and change management include:

  • The degree to which workflows have been changed as a result of the KIBO OMS deployment.

  • Familiarization time needed by users.

  • Local compensation rates.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $391,000.

“We did staged rollouts. We didn’t release it to all stores at once. We did it in waves and hosted online webinars with 50 stores at a time. Once we got through the pilot stage, we started gaining momentum, hosting larger audiences for training.”

Director of enterprise systems and PMO, apparel

Training And Change Management
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Distribution center workers participating in OMS training Composite with 20% turnover   250 40 50
G2 Training time per distribution center worker (hours) Interviews   2 2 2
G3 Fully burdened hourly rate for a distribution center worker Composite   $26 $26 $26
G4 Subtotal: Distribution center training cost G1*G2*G3   $13,000 $2,080 $2,600
G5 Store associates participating in OMS training Composite with 20% turnover   10,000 2,000 2,000
G6 Training time per store associate (hours) Interviews   1 1 1
G7 Fully burdened hourly rate for a store associate Composite   $26 $26 $26
G8 Subtotal: Store associate training cost G5*G6*G7   $260,000 $52,000 $52,000
G9 Merchandizers participating in OMS training Composite with 20% turnover   50 10 10
G10 Training time per merchandizer (hours) Interviews   4 4 4
G11 Fully burdened hourly rate for a merchandizer Composite   $24 $24 $24
G12 Subtotal: Merchandizer and marketer training cost G9*G10*G11   $4,800 $960 $960
Gt Training and change management G4+G8+G12 $0 $277,800 $55,040 $55,560
  Risk adjustment 15%        
Gtr Training and change management (risk-adjusted)   $0 $319,470 $63,296 $63,894
Three-year total: $446,660 Three-year present value: $390,743

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($879,750) ($1,413,470) ($1,653,421) ($1,702,450) ($5,649,091) ($4,810,263)
Total benefits $0 $3,378,750 $6,086,720 $6,296,316 $15,761,786 $12,832,454
Net benefits ($879,750) $1,965,280 $4,433,299 $4,593,866 $10,112,695 $8,022,191
ROI           167%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in KIBO Order Management.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that KIBO Order Management can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed KIBO stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to KIBO Order Management.

Interviews

Interviewed six decision-makers at four organizations using KIBO Order Management to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Supplemental Material

Related Forrester Research

Lessons Learned From The Forrester Wave™: Order Management Systems, Q1 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., April 28, 2025.

March 12, 2025, The Forrester Wave Uncovers Evolution In Order Management Systems Webinar.

Emily Pfeiffer and Delilah Gonzalez, Dual-OMS TEI: Companies Actually Get Their Money’s Worth, Forrester Blogs.

Dual-OMS Strategy Pays Off When The Secondary OMS Improves Revenue, Forrester Research, Inc., February 14, 2025.

Emily Pfeiffer, Order Management Systems And A Story Of Augmented Evolution, Forrester Blogs.

Order Management Systems Market Insights, 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., January 13, 2025.

The Order Management Systems Landscape, Q3 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., September 3, 2024.

OMS And E-Commerce Solution Adoption Is Pervasive Among Retailers, Forrester Research, Inc., August 8, 2023.

Appendix C

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by KIBO and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Order Management.

KIBO reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

KIBO provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Caro Giordano

Published

October 2025