Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of HPE Nonstop Systems

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By HPE Nonstop Systems

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY HPE, February 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of HPE Nonstop Systems

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY HPE, February 2026

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By HPE Nonstop Systems

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

AI’s rapid acceleration has forced enterprises with high-criticality workloads to reframe their infrastructure as a platform for long-term business outcomes. In addition to maximizing uptime, these always-on workloads now require infrastructure to be service-driven through automatable interfaces to meet the demands of AI, digital transformation, and compliance.1 Aligning infrastructure strategy with the uptime, security, and compliance needs of the business turns infrastructure from a commodity to a platform for long-term strategic enablement.2

HPE Nonstop Systems provide a fully integrated, faulttolerant compute platform designed to keep missioncritical workloads running continuously with no service interruption, and takeover at the millisecond level. It combines fault tolerance via a shared-nothing, full-system clustered architecture; builtin high availability; and modern system interfaces for easier integration and migration. The platform also ensures high scalability, which is the capacity to deliver consistent, alwayson operations with high uptime SLAs even as the solution grows in volume and use cases.

HPE commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying HPE Nonstop Systems.3 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Nonstop Systems on their organizations.

103%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$56.0M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six decision-makers with experience using Nonstop Systems. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a conglomerate comprising major business units in transaction processing and smart manufacturing and has a combined annual revenue of $50 billion.

Interviewees said that prior to using HPE Nonstop Systems, their organizations’ legacy environments comprised outdated equipment, which caused costly downtime while increasing complexity, maintenance, and overhead. At the same time, their infrastructure teams lacked the resources needed to manage and troubleshoot high-criticality downtime issues, while enterprise teams struggled to keep up with market pressures to integrate new capabilities and stay compliant with relevant regulations.

After the investment in HPE Nonstop Systems, the interviewees described more secure, resilient, and manageable operating environments across diverse technology landscapes. The Nonstop platform strengthened baseline security, reduced operational exposure, and supported more consistent governance at scale, creating a data foundation that supported operational continuity and improved decisionmaking through stable, highquality data flows. Furthermore, the adoption of HPE Nonstop Systems consistently strengthened business outcomes by enhancing performance efficiency at scale, enabling more reliable highvolume transaction environments and supporting the development of new product streams and more efficient workflows.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • A 90% increase in uptime for 24/7 mission-critical systems, with improved data integrity. HPE Nonstop Systems consistently delivers higher operational stability for the composite by sustaining nearcontinuous availability and sharply reducing unplanned disruptions that previously cost the composite millions annually. The platform improves performance predictability by stabilizing throughput under heavy load and lowering latency in routine and peak conditions. Its faulttolerant architecture supports uninterrupted processing, which strengthens resilience for environments that depend on reliable, realtime transactions. Altogether this increase in system uptime yields $86.4 million for the composite organization.

  • A 75% decrease in exposure to breach costs from addressable cyberattacks. HPE Nonstop Systems strengthens overall security by reducing alert volume, lowering unauthorized access attempts, and decreasing severe attack exposure — even as operational workloads increased. The platform also shortens patching and maintenance windows, which reduces the composite organization’s operational vulnerability and stabilizes performance during routine updates. Across all settings, the platform creates a more resilient, predictable, and governable security posture that supports continuous operations, with $758,000 in security risk mitigation for the composite.

  • Improved operational and revenue scalability worth $23.3 million. HPE Nonstop Systems payasyougo capacity models drive revenue and operational scalability by increasing transaction capacity and launching new revenue streams based on the insight derived from HPE Nonstop’s data layer. The platform allows the composite to reallocate quickly nodes and scale system costs with actual utilization, eliminating the barriers of large capital expenditure and accelerating scale operations. This brings additional capacity online faster and minimizes the lag between demand spikes and revenue realization, reducing operational friction and accelerating monetization for new product lines, for a 0.2% increase in operating margin and $23.3 million in improved scalability.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Improved product quality and related customer satisfaction. Interviewees noted that the HPE Nonstop data layer enabled automated, live insights for faster detection and resolution of quality issues, ultimately resulting in higher customer satisfaction.

  • Improved operational and posture compliance. HPE Nonstop strengthened compliance by delivering builtin security, auditing, and resilient architectural controls. Secure access, centralized monitoring, and consistent policy enforcement across complex environments provided a dependable foundation for compliancecritical workloads.

  • Increased cyber insurance benefits. HPE Nonstop’s centralized, faulttolerant operations strengthened cybersecurity posture and reduced risk exposure, leading to greater insurer confidence and more favorable cyber insurance costs over time.

  • Enterprisewide labor savings. HPE Nonstop automated and accelerated reporting, testing, and normalization activities. This reduced administrative effort, shortening verification cycles and improving the efficiency of compliance operations while freeing resources for highervalue work.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • HPE Nonstop Systems. The composite’s costs for HPE include core infrastructure licensing for HPE X software; hardware and capital investments; consumptionbased pricing with GreenLake; and additional support, workloadspecific licensing, and scalability costs, totaling $47.3 million.

  • Platform deployment and administration. Ongoing management of HPE Nonstop Systems requires a dedicated team to manage their organization’s centralized and distributed environments. Altogether, these platform deployment and administration costs total $7.1 million for the composite.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $110.4 million over three years versus costs of $54.4 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $56.0 million and an ROI of 103%.

90%

Reduction in downtime frequency and duration for 24/7 mission-critical systems

“[If we had stayed with the legacy environment], we would have ended up paying more, and I would have not achieved the [organization’s] performance and latency [objectives]. So going with HPE Nonstop Systems is a win-win situation. I have not only improved my performance and latency, I have also reduced costs … related to transaction volumes [due to] economies of scale … which will impact our profitability.”

Technology leader, financial services

Key Statistics

103%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$110.4M

Benefits PV 

$56.0M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Improved uptime Enhanced security Increased scalability

The HPE Nonstop Systems Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Nonstop Systems investment
Interviews
Role Industry Region Revenue
Technology leader Financial services North America $25 billion to $49 billion
Security leader Financial services EMEA $50 billion to $99 billion
IT operations leader Financial services APAC $5 billion to $9 billion
Business leader Smart manufacturing EMEA $50 billion to $99 billion
Data and AI product manager Smart manufacturing North America $25 billion to $49 billion
Director of industrial automation” Smart manufacturing EMEA $10 billion to $24 billion
Key Challenges

Prior to deploying HPE Nonstop Systems, interviewees described how their technology ecosystems lacked the resilience, security, and scalability demanded by highvolume operations. Increasing transactional and dataprocessing demands overwhelmed their legacy architectures’ capacity to sustain the continuous, realtime requirements of missioncritical workloads. At the same time, core systems showed signs of structural fatigue, creating exposure across performance, risk management, and operational continuity. Across industries, interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Steep customer, compliance, and operational impacts of downtime. The interviewees shared how their organizations’ prior environments had experienced recurring performance degradation driven by growing transaction volumes. Transactional systems frequently hit throughput limits and bottlenecks, and even short outages disrupted services and created ripple effects across service delivery. Failover-driven designs paused realtime flows during switching events, which prolonged maintenance and reduced predictability.
    The IT operations leader at the financial services firm indicated: “Our transaction volumes have been growing steadily, and even short periods of downtime have led to service disruption, operational stress, and potential revenue impact. We had multiple layers of redundancy, but they still didn’t eliminate the risk of service interruption. From a business standpoint, that essentially created a constraint on how aggressively we could scale our services.”

  • Operational and brand impacts due to lags and downtime. Interviewees described operational slowdowns and disruptions that occurred due to latency, delayed data updates, and synchronization gaps between central and local systems, resulting in workflow interruptions; misaligned plans; and losses from wasted resources, quality issues, and downtime. A lack of available local troubleshooting resources as well as supply chain and geopolitical shocks all exacerbated the organizations’ pain points around maintaining high availability.
    The business leader at the smart manufacturing company described the cascading impacts of downtime in their prior environment: “If there is interruption, the manufacturing execution system and the quality management system will definitely become impacted, so the quality of the product will be impacted. If the complete latency is coming in, the data volume has been large, [or] the data frequency is being delayed, the operation will be impacted. The quality will not be achieved, and that non-quality product will be served to the people and the customers — that will impact your brand. The first realistic impact of your latency is the brand value reduction.”

  • Security gaps. Interviewees shared how cyber incidents in their organizations’ prior environments exposed deep weaknesses in older system layers. Insufficient segmentation allowed cyberactors to penetrate deep operational layers, revealing weaknesses in legacy systems and insufficient isolation across critical operational technologies (OTs). These gaps complicated recovery efforts and increased reliance on manual governance, reporting, and forensic activities. At the same time, data collection pipelines across manufacturing sites suffered from inconsistent protection. The distance between physical and edge layers, combined with outdated gateway architectures, had created vulnerabilities in IT/OT integrations and increased the likelihood of misrouted signals, data leakage, corrupted data flows, and insecure exchanges across distant sites and gateways.
    The IT operations leader at the financial services firm indicated that their prior environment suffered from DDoS or authentication disturbances during critical attacks: “Before we deployed Nonstop, we experienced four to six failover triggers, disruptions, [or other] failure-related security instances per year. … Each instance could cause 5 to 15 minutes of degradation or interruption in our previous environment.”

  • Constraints to operational and revenue scalability. The interviewees reported that rapid growth in transactional demand outpaced the capabilities of earlier architecture, which had reached the upper limits of their transactionhandling capabilities. Transactionpersecond ceilings restricted the ability to scale services, limiting flexibility for growth and modernization efforts.
    Capital and operational costs also magnified scalability constraints. Aging legacy hardware required costly resource optimization and expensive capacity cycles. Additionally, operational environments lacked realtime, highresolution data inputs necessary to scale connected operations across diverse sites and support predictive analytics, autonomous decisioning, and large-scale digital transformation.
    The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate shared: “We did not have standardized databases, so for AI purposes, we could not really do analytics on a global scale. The other big pain point for us was the costs at a plant level. They were not manageable at an enterprise level because we had disparate systems with disparate contracts and different versions and different vendors in play.”

“[The cost of downtime for us] is around $2 million to $2.7 million for every hour, and it’s a bit of an exponential-losses situation. As you go from 4 hours and beyond, that could go up to tens of millions of dollars because the queue is building up [and] we can’t shut that pipe down. We have to give customers access to [their] money.”

Technology leader, financial services

Solution Requirements

The interviewees shared how their organizations searched for a solution that could stabilize uninterrupted operations across environments where even brief disruption created operational risk. Their investment criteria and solution requirements prioritized the ability to support continuous operations of critical workloads, align with modernization goals, and enable scalable, datadriven capabilities across complex environments. In particular, the solution needed to ensure:

  • Highperformance uptime across critical workflows. Interviewees noted that their organizations selected HPE Nonstop Systems because of its ability to operate continuously without downtime, sustain workloadintensive processing cycles, deliver predictable throughput, and manage failures without impacting live services. The organizations required consistent performance, redundant components across all system layers, and mechanisms that maintained processing during failures. In distributed and industrial settings, the platform needed to support steady data capture; manage latency across long distances; and maintain reliable communication between physical equipment, edge systems, and central platforms.
    The technology leader at the financial services company shared: “Fault tolerance [and] switchover are important to banking because [in the prior environment], one of our critical applications during switchover was down for 2 hours, and our regulator actually sanctioned [us with a] penalty. It impacts your reputation. We needed [a solution with] a very stringent fault-tolerance level or that can easily switch over, because failover cannot be avoided, but how quickly you recover, that is important.”

  • Enterprise modernization and platform security. Interviewees described how their organizations sought a more unified operational model with HPE to replace fragmented legacy environments. The platform needed to manage increasing transaction volumes, enable parallel workloads, and maintain predictable performance across diverse locations. The interviewees’ organizations also required centralized administration, flexible deployment options for onpremises edge and edge devices and systems, diagnostic visibility, and predictable cost structures that aligned resource use with workload demand.
    The technology leader at the financial services company shared how HPE Nonstop helped their organization avoid the purchase of additional security tools to stay ahead of sophisticated cyberattacks: “Considering the latest modernized attack, I might have to introduce different security providers. … [With HPE Nonstop], I do not require multiple vendors … and [that’s] without impacting performance.”

  • Insightdriven architecture for advanced analytics. The interviewees emphasized the importance of HPE Nonstop Systems’ capabilities to support realtime and nearrealtime data access, with robust datacollection pathways and monitoring tools to improve visibility and decision confidence. In particular, they noted the need for an advanced data layer to enable and scale AI and big data initiatives without disrupting core operations. Integration across multiple operational tiers was essential. The platform needed to coordinate data effectively, operate stable middleware, and support loadbalanced pathways without introducing bottlenecks.
    The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate told Forrester: “In order to begin to use big data and AI, we needed to standardize our platform to be able to get to the point where we could do analytics that were meaningful in a global level. … We’re looking to have zero downtime because downtime for us is money.”

“This is a solution for companies with [mission-critical] intellectual [property] that they want to keep close to their on-prem system. … Our manufacturing data and the systems we’re running are highly proprietary, so we want to have ownership of the data even if the systems are leased. Ultimately, we are still owners of the data.”

Director of industrial automation, smart manufacturing

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The global, multibillion-dollar conglomerate comprises major business units in financial services and smart manufacturing, respectively. It has 50 globally distributed sites, including production sites. In the prior environment, the organization had 99.5% availability, with 43.8 hours of downtime each year for 24/7 mission-critical systems.             

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite organization adopted HPE Nonstop Systems in its manufacturing facilities and workloads, as well as to support ongoing financial services operations. It deploys the HPE Nonstop Systems hardware and software environment with an upfront capital investment. Ongoing data consumption drives its GreenLake private cloud environment, with HPE managed services and 24/7 support. By the end of Year 1, the composite has deployed HPE Nonstop Systems to 50% of its mission-critical workloads. This increases to 75% by Year 2 and reaches a full deployment of HPE Nonstop Systems to 100% of its tier one high-criticality workloads in Year 3.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $50 billion annual revenue

  • 11% blended operating margin

  • 100,000 FTEs

  • 99.5% uptime prior to HPE

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Improved uptime $23,652,000 $35,478,000 $47,304,000 $106,434,000 $86,362,675
Btr Enhanced security $207,455 $311,183 $414,911 $933,549 $757,500
Ctr Increased scalability $9,350,000 $9,350,000 $9,350,000 $28,050,000 $23,252,066
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $33,209,455 $45,139,183 $57,068,911 $135,417,549 $110,372,241
Improved Uptime

Evidence and data. Interviewees discussed how their highvolume, lowlatency workloads required uninterrupted throughput and predictable latency. With the adoption of HPE Nonstop Systems, interviewees reported fewer serviceimpacting incidents across contexts. Additional interviewee-reported benefits included:

  • Broad-based improvements in uptime and availability. Interviewees reported that HPE Nonstop Systems’ platform increased total processing efficiency by improving transaction throughput, reducing latency, and strengthening system responsiveness, even at peak load. The data environment also became more consistent, as parallel processing and faulttolerant database structures reduced corruption risk and supported reliable realtime analytics. As a result, overall uptime increased into the 99.99% to near-100% range, and once-common unplanned outages were effectively eliminated.
    The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate shared how their organization significantly reduced downtime for mission-critical systems with the investment in HPE Nonstop: “[Now, our downtime is] approaching zero. It’s at >99.999%. … The reality is [that Nonstop] has massive parallel processing capabilities such that before, when we had to update 43 locations, it would take us a week, and now it takes us a couple of hours. That’s part of the whole availability equation. … The latency of the system itself is near zero, [and] these particular systems can handle up to 8 TB throughput, so that’s a lot.”

  • Faster and more seamless failover capabilities. Nonstop’s faulttolerant architecture enabled instantaneous failover between system components, which reduced and removed transaction bottlenecks and operational delays.

    • The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate shared that the platform’s builtin fault tolerance allowed instantaneous, seamless failover and ensured uninterrupted operations compared to the prior environment, which required up to an hour.
    • The technology leader at the financial services company noted faster switching time with HPE. They said, “From one failure server to another server, Nonstop Systems was 8% better compared to [our prior environment, and] for a bank, that makes a huge, huge difference.”

  • Improved system performance. These gains in uptime and failover also contributed to better performance, lower variability during highdemand periods, and a more predictable user experience.
    The technology leader at a financial services company noted that system performance improved by 7%. They shared, “When it comes to the TPS (total transaction per second), HPE Nonstop was 7% better as compared to [our prior environment].”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Each year in the prior environment, the composite had an average of 99.5% availability of 24/7 mission-critical systems, resulting in 43.8 hours of downtime for tier one high-criticality workloads.

  • The average total cost of 1 hour of downtime for tier one high-criticality workloads is $1,500,000 for the composite, based on varying customer, regulatory, and operational impacts.

  • With HPE Nonstop Systems, the composite organization reduces unplanned downtime frequency and duration for 24/7 mission-critical systems by 90% over the three-year period.

  • In Year 1, 50% of the composite organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads are supported by HPE Nonstop Systems; that rises to 75% in Year 2 and 100% in Year 3.

Risks. The following factors could impact this benefit for organizations:

  • An organization’s availability requirements for 24/7 services, including the number and nature of an organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads that are migrated to the Nonstop environment.

  • The frequency, redundancy, nature, and severity of network downtime and performance issues or severe performance degradation for 24/7 services fielded in the prior environment, and the amount of time it took to resolve them before.

  • The average cost of downtime as it relates to the revenue, regulatory, operational/supply chain, customer satisfaction, or other costs of downtime for tier one high-criticality workloads.

  • The skill sets available for managing mission-critical workloads, infrastructure, and site reliability

  • A company’s operating margin.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $86.3 million.

90%

Percentage reduction in downtime for 24/7 mission-critical systems with HPE Nonstop Systems

“[If] one instance of the OS goes down, the other one takes over flawlessly with no recovery or downtime. You can’t even tell the difference if one went down, with zero downtime in between.”

Director of industrial automation, smart manufacturing

Improved Uptime
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Availability of 24/7 mission-critical systems in the prior environment Composite 99.5% 99.5% 99.5%
A2 Downtime for 24/7 mission-critical systems across all affected sites in the prior environment (hours) (1-A1)*24*365 43.8 43.8 43.8
A3 Cost of 1 hour of downtime for 24/7 mission-critical systems across all affected sites in the prior environment Composite $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
A4 HPE cumulative deployment curve Composite 50% 75% 100%
A5 Percentage reduction in downtime frequency and duration for 24/7 mission-critical systems with HPE Nonstop Systems Interviews 90% 90% 90%
At Improved uptime A2*A3*A4*A5 $29,565,000 $44,347,500 $59,130,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Atr Improved uptime (risk-adjusted)   $23,652,000 $35,478,000 $47,304,000
Three-year total: $106,434,000 Three-year present value: $86,362,675
Enhanced Security

Evidence and data. HPE Nonstop Systems created a more secure, resilient, and manageable operating environment across diverse technology landscapes. Financial services environments benefited most from reduced disruption during highvolume periods and more manageable monitoring demands, while manufacturing environments gained from stronger protection across devicetoenterprise data flows and earlier detection of operational anomalies. The platform architecture enabled consistent protection across both transactional and dataintensive workflows and led to:

  • Proactive security optimizations. Security patching and update cycles became faster, reducing downtime windows by 18% to 20% and minimizing operational vulnerability during maintenance. The consolidated security stack reduced the need for multiple third-party security tools, lowering operational overhead while maintaining protection.
    The technology leader at the financial services company shared how HPE Nonstop reduced downtime related to security patching and strengthening by up to 20%, from 120 to 100 minutes on average: “Security is not just about the attack. Security is all about how much time you take for assessment, for monitoring, for implementation. … You have to regularly do updates and patching. … [With HPE Nonstop], time for updating, upgrading, and patching in terms of security has come down drastically, [and] that 18% to 20% time savings is crucial. It’s very important because whenever you are applying the patches and updates, your main system gets down. You cannot run the business; you have your system down for some time because at the back end, you are running the patches, you are running the update, so that is another significant improvement.”

  • Reactive security improvements. Interviewees described how the Nonstop platform reduced exposure to threats, improved incident stability, and supported more efficient oversight of largescale environments.
    The technology leader at the financial services company shared how HPE Nonstop helped streamline proactive security monitoring efforts: “My security monitoring has now become very easy. Previously, close to 70 people were required for monitoring, just monitoring. Now, irrespective of the fact that I have [increased transaction volumes] by 40%, that [staffing requirement] has come down by 50%.”

  • Fewer external attacks. The platform reduced platform level security alerts by 40% to 60%, which lowered operational noise and improved the signal-to-risk ratio for security teams. Unauthorized access attempts declined by 30% to 40%, as stronger process isolation and integrated access controls reduced exposure at system boundaries. The rate of severe attacks decreased significantly, with overall attack volume dropping even as transactional workloads increased, which demonstrated better defense at scale.
    The technology leader at the financial services company shared that their organization effectively blocked 75% of potential attacks by extrapolating the security impact of Nonstop compared to the prior environment, even while increasing transaction volume by 40%: “Previously, I was witness to 250 severe attacks in a year. … When we upgraded to HPE Nonstop, that 250 has come down to 180. … Now, my transactions have gone up by 40%, but still, attacks have gone down by 80. [Had] we gone with the same [legacy] system and [increased] the number of transactions, those 250 [attacks] could have increased to up to 400, [for an effective] 75% improvement. This is not assumption. This is a well-documented figure.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In the prior environment, the composite organization had a 39% likelihood of one or more breaches originating from external attacks, with annual risk exposure of $4,912,000. In addition, 53% of breaches originated from external attacks and internal incidents targeting the composite. Of those attacks, 20% were directed at high-criticality systems and addressable with HPE Nonstop Systems, for a total annual risk exposure of $650,840 in the prior environment.4

  • With HPE Nonstop Systems, the composite reduces attack surfaces, increases visibility, and improves patching and update consistency. This reduces the risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks with HPE Nonstop Systems by 75%.

  • In Year 1, 50% of the composite organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads are supported by HPE Nonstop Systems; that rises to 75% in Year 2 and 100% in Year 3.

Risks. The following factors could impact this benefit for organizations:

  • An organization’s availability requirements for 24/7 services, including the number and nature of an organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads that are migrated to the Nonstop environment.

  • The region, industry, and organization size, which can affect the threat type; sophistication of attacks; and the ability to prevent, detect, and remediate them.

  • An organization’s security culture and maturity, the breadth of security tools, the integration and functional capabilities of other cybersecurity software, and the likelihood and associated costs of security breaches each year, which may impact an organization’s cost of a breach.

  • The skill sets and salaries available for FTEs in security operations, infrastructure, and site reliability.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $758,000.

75%

Reduced risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks with HPE Nonstop Systems

“Within [the cloud] environment, I think Nonstop is much more secure than other environments. It’s probably at the top of the security’s food chain.”

Technology CCO leader, financial services

Enhanced Security
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Total annual risk exposure to security breaches for the composite organization Forrester research $4,912,000 $4,912,000 $4,912,000
B2 Percentage of breaches originating from external attacks and internal incidents targeting the composite organization Forrester Research 53% 53% 53%
B3 Percentage of those attacks addressable with HPE Nonstop Systems Interviews 25% 25% 25%
B4 Annual risk exposure addressable with HPE Nonstop Systems B1*B2*B3 $650,840 $650,840 $650,840
B5 Reduced risk of exposure to breach costs from addressable attacks with HPE Nonstop Systems Interviews 75% 75% 75%
B6 HPE cumulative deployment curve A4 50% 75% 100%
Bt Enhanced Security B4*B5*B6 $244,065 $366,098 $488,130
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Btr Enhanced security (risk-adjusted)   $207,455 $311,183 $414,911
Three-year total: $933,549 Three-year present value: $757,500
Increased Scalability

Evidence and data. Interviewees shared how HPE Nonstop Systems provided their organizations with stable data foundations, centralized control, and repeatable software-defined infrastructure that enabled rapid expansion without proportionate cost growth. The platform supported payasyougo capacity models that scaled system costs with actual utilization, eliminating the barriers of large capital expenditure for launching new revenue streams, as well as:

  • Augmented operational agility. Interviewees noted that Nonstop’s elastic clustering scaled capacity on demand, allowing their teams to direct resources to hot spots without long procurement cycles. Provisioning, regression testing, and postscale normalization completed in less time, which reduced the window between scaleup and revenue realization. Softwaredefined architectures rapidly replicated validated patterns, while payasyougo models aligned cost with utilization, supporting profitable scale.

    • The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate described the dynamic scalability of their organization’s HPE Nonstop environment: “Right now, we are provisioned at about 25%, [so] we would have to scale up to 160 locations before we would even need to talk to HPE to increase our hardware capacity. But the great part about that scalability is that we’re only being charged for pay-as-you-go. So, yes, we have the scalability, but we’re only paying for what we’re using.”
    • The technology leader at the financial services company shared how HPE Nonstop Systems helps their organization provision and test 50% faster than in their prior environment and helps to normalize their system far faster and with one-third of the staffing requirement: “HPE Nonstop supports very [fast] integration testing or regression testing. I can do it probably in an hour’s time or less, [while] the competitors are now taking 2 hours. … Sometimes it takes 3 hours to come back to the system at the normal speed when you scale up. … [Now], with the help of HPE, [we] can normalize the system in real time [even though] we scaled [the requirement] roughly down to 10 FTEs.”
      Overall, the technology leader at the financial services company highlighted how, when compared to their prior systems or to a competitive solution, the HPE Nonstop platform was able to support their organization’s 40% increase in transaction volume at a 4.5% reduction in cost per transaction, all while maintaining the same performance for the same latency.

  • Improved profit margin with scaled transaction volumes. Interviewees described how HPE Nonstop Systems helped expand throughput and materially increased transaction counts, which supported revenue growth under higher transaction loads. Stable, realtime data across production and transactional flows reduced cancellations, rework, and leakage, which reinforced both topline and margin outcomes. By removing IT bottlenecks, the platform enabled continuous availability and predictable performance at higher volumes.

    • The technology leader at the financial services company shared that, with the 40% increase in transaction volumes that HPE Nonstop enabled and with the added capabilities for product innovation with AI, their organization saw significant improvement in revenue and profitability. The new data foundation improved production efficiency, increasing profit by over 20%, with 0.23% of growth from initiatives related to HPE. The Nonstop platform enabled business objectives around AI/ML capabilities, as well as real-time insights on increased productivity, energy efficiency, and sustainability. They said: “We actually increased the number of transactions [by 40%], which definitely will have impact, not only on revenue but [also on] your profitability. … My revenue has increased by 22% in last three years. My profitability actually has shot up by 26%. … I would say around 0.23% of the complete growth is coming from these Nonstop-enabled initiatives: the data foundation, AI/ML capabilities, the governance of data, and how actually we are utilizing it [for] good, real-time insights.”
    • The technology leader at a financial services company noted: “Compared to [our legacy system], our transaction volumes have doubled [due to] market volatility, the growth in the business, and payments processing enhancements [more broadly. Now], we can scale up the cluster a lot faster, almost like a cloud deployment, by adding more nodes and more capacity, and then [we can] take down nodes and capacity when not required and allocate them elsewhere.”
    • The business leader at the smart manufacturing company discussed how data latency issues in the prior environment prevented their organization from gathering real-time insights into equipment efficiency, which in turn impacted manufacturing productivity. With the real-time data insights and predictions enabled by HPE Nonstop, they reported that their organization was able to improve efficiency and reduce losses by 10% to 12% compared to their prior environment, bringing equipment efficiency to a range of 92% to 93%. They shared: “From a cloud perspective, we are actually utilizing it in terms of AI/ML, in terms of predictive, prescriptive kinds of insights. And that has given us 10% to 12% of the overall equipment efficiency for each and every manufacturing site wherever we have deployed the complete HPE X-generation software.”

  • New AI-developed product and operational innovations informed by Nonstop’s real-time data analytics. HPE Nonstop delivered low latency, live data pipelines that supported preparation of high-quality data layers and consistent, scalable integration across enterprise and industrial systems. These capabilities enabled AI/ML, agentic AI, and analytics to run reliably and at scale. Interviewees noted how the Nonstop environment sustained real-time data quality, which expanded AI use cases across process, quality, engineering, and maintenance functions. Continuous connectivity supported anomaly detection and operational analytics, which strengthened decision accuracy during demand growth.
    The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate shared that, prior to the HPE investment, their organization was decentralized, and their database structures were not standardized. After the HPE investment, their organization was able to leverage the platform’s capabilities to standardize data and provide the ongoing transactional accuracy needed to be consumed by large language models. They shared, “From the standpoint of fault tolerance of our databases — since these databases are running on multiple copies of systems simultaneously — these databases are flawlessly updated, and the potential for data corruption within those particular instances is near zero.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization has $50 billion in annual revenue and an 11% operating margin.

  • In Year 1, 50% of the composite’s tier one high-criticality workloads are supported by HPE Nonstop Systems; that rises to 75% in Year 2 and 100% in Year 3.

  • The composite organization improves scalability with HPE Nonstop Systems by delivering a stable, alwayson data foundation with softwaredefined replication that enables rapid expansion without linear cost growth. Elastic clustering and payasyougo capacity with GreenLake allow systems to scale on demand, align costs with utilization, and accelerate time to value. Faster provisioning, testing, and normalization convert capacity into revenue more quickly while maintaining predictable performance and low latency. Realtime, highquality data at scale supports higher transaction volumes, improved margins, and continuous availability, enabling profitable growth without operational bottlenecks. Taken together, these scalability improvements help the composite organization develop new products that increase the operating margin by 0.2%.

Risks. The following factors could impact this benefit for organizations:

  • An organization’s availability requirements for 24/7 services, including the number and nature of an organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads that are migrated to the Nonstop environment.

  • The extent to which an organization invests in data analytics and data infrastructure as it integrates HPE Nonstop Systems as part of the organization’s data layer to identify opportunities to reduce overhead from processes and infrastructure, as well as to increase revenue from new products and other innovations.

  • An organization’s operating margin.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $23.3 million.

$23.3 million

Improved profit attributed to HPE Nonstop Systems–enabled products

“With HPE, we like the [massive scalability and pay-as-you-go [setup]. It’s like the equivalent of having your own hyperscaling system with even better system availability than cloud providers.”

Director of industrial automation, smart manufacturing

Improved Scalability
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Annual revenue Composite $50,000,000,000 $50,000,000,000 $50,000,000,000
C2 Operating margin Composite 11% 11% 11%
C3 Percentage increase in profitability attributed to new products developed and enabled with HPE Nonstop Systems Interviews 0.20% 0.20% 0.20%
Ct Improved profitability C1*C2*C3 $11,000,000 $11,000,000 $11,000,000
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Ctr Improved profitability (risk-adjusted)   $9,350,000 $9,350,000 $9,350,000
Three-year total: $28,050,000 Three-year present value: $23,252,066
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Improved product quality and related customer satisfaction. HPE Nonstop provided realtime data availability and significantly reduced latency, which allowed operational teams to identify issues more quickly and address them with greater precision. This stability supported more reliable processes and improved overall product performance. Automated insights replaced manual investigation, reducing delays and enhancing the speed and accuracy of qualityrelated decisions. As a result, customers experienced more consistent service levels, faster resolution of issues, and improved satisfaction driven by operational transparency and responsiveness.
    The data and AI product manager at a manufacturing firm shared: “HPE Nonstop has connectivity features and leverages telemetry data live, [which helps] us address some of the quality issues quicker and much more robustly. Previously, a customer would have had to call someone from our central team who would have just referred them to a local retailer, who then would have had to run some analytics manually. Now, in some cases, we can get these insights live just based on the event.”

  • Compliance. HPE Nonstop offered interviewees’ organizations integrated security, auditing, and resilient architectural controls that strengthened compliance adherence across complex environments. These builtin capabilities reduced the need for extensive supplemental tooling and supported more consistent enforcement of policies and processes.

    • The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate shared: “Security is always complex; however, I would say our overall cybersecurity posture has improved significantly. With the more standardized and more centralized HPE Nonstop, we were able to achieve Zero Trust access control. It helped us to simplify our compliance for both our customers and our insurance carrier [and] helps us to manage all that along with governance and compliance. These systems … centralize that function versus a decentralized 43-location approach.”
    • The technology leader at a financial services company noted: “We use it for compliance purposes for PCI DSS [Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard] and SOC 2 [System and Organization Controls 2], as well having that security built in, which provides a level of compliance requirements that we otherwise would have to deploy ourselves.”

  • Cyber insurance. The HPE Nonstop environment reduced systemic exposure and strengthened the consistency of controls, which helped lower cyber insurance costs. Organizations benefited from a more stable risk profile as insurers recognized the reduced likelihood of downtime, breachrelated escalation, or systemwide failures. The platform’s reliability and governance reinforced customers’ confidence in the operational environment and contributed to more favorable insurance terms over time.
    The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate shared: “Our insurance carrier bases how much we pay in premiums for cybersecurity insurance based on our ability to achieve a Zero Trust Access Control environment and to integrate our identity management systems, and also at the same time, ensuring the highest availability with sensitive types of transactional data.”

  • Enterprisewide labor savings. The platform enabled faster access to governed data, integrating seamlessly with modern data lake and reporting environments. Activities that previously required substantial time — such as regulatory reporting, operational reviews, or changedriven data extraction — benefited from automation and reduced dependence on specialized resources. Regression testing and environment normalization completed more quickly, supporting shorter verification cycles and helping teams return systems to steady state with limited disruption.
    The technology leader at the financial services company shared, “You will be truly amazed to hear how we could lower administrative labor and overtime optimization.”

“[HPE Nonstop] has a really clear impact on customer experience when they see that we leverage the latest technology and can just address the issues much more quickly and robustly. … This is already quite important and can make the difference between a repeat customer and a customer that moves on to a different brand, so any gain in those spaces is quite critical.”

Data and AI leader, smart manufacturing

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Nonstop Systems and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Quantum safe cryptography. HPE Nonstop supported public key infrastructure (PKI)-anchored controls and accommodated workloads that required quantum safe cryptographic readiness. Interviewees noted that HPE Nonstop supported their organizations’ journeys towards a public-key infrastructure (PKI) to accommodate workloads that required quantum safe cryptographic readiness. The technology CCO leader at a financial services company noted: “We have a lot of environments that require post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Once you have PKI infrastructure, any of your certificates can be vulnerable and we are glad to see PQC support in HPE Nonstop roadmap.”

  • Sustainability. HPE Nonstop enabled digital workflows that decreased reliance on manual, paperbased processes, which supported improvements in carbon performance and sustainability metrics. The availability of realtime operational insights allowed interviewees’ organizations to better identify inefficiencies, optimize resource use, and reduce energy consumption. In production settings, these insights supported targeted interventions that lowered energy waste and delivered measurable sustainability gains.
    The technology leader at the financial services company shared: “When it comes to sustainability [with HPE Nonstop systems], everything is correlated. [As] my digital footprint increases, my digital transformation increases, [so] my number of transactions in digital channels has increased. As a result, we had a significant reduction in our carbon [emissions], with a 30% improvement in our carbon footprint.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Dtr HPE Nonstop Systems $3,960,000 $11,880,000 $17,820,000 $23,760,000 $57,420,000 $47,338,512
Etr Platform deployment and administration $2,887,500 $2,310,000 $1,636,250 $962,500 $7,796,250 $7,062,913
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $6,847,500 $14,190,000 $19,456,250 $24,722,500 $65,216,250 $54,401,425
HPE Nonstop Systems

Evidence and data. The interviewees described various configurations of their Nonstop environments to ensure continuous, uninterrupted operations of mission-critical systems. Transaction processing deployments used tightly configured HPE Nonstop Systems for high-transactionfocused workloads, while smart manufacturing environments spread their licensed components across many sites that required wide data collection and middleware activity. The interviewees’ environments used the following HPE components, which included spending on hardware configuration, operational workloads, and ongoing resource consumption:

  • Core infrastructure licensing for hardware and capital investments. The interviewees’ organizations deployed HPE Nonstop Systems X-generation software, with licensing costs tied to CPU cores; memory sizes; system throughput ranges; and workload categories such as processing, switching, and reconciliation.

  • Consumptionbased pricing with GreenLake. Interviewees highlighted the importance of HPE’s unique consumption-based pricing model to their organizational goals for agility and flexibility. Subscription pricing was based on the level of compute and storage resources activated across sites.
    The director shared automation services at a smart manufacturing conglomerate told Forrester about their organization’s GreenLake private cloud environment, an on-premises deployment on NS5: “GreenLake is HPE’s pay-as-you-go, consumption-based subscription model. In this case, it’s in a colocation facility where the ownership of the hardware is theirs, but the data center is ours. The obvious advantage of this model is there is no upfront capital expense — everything is expensed as you go along. It’s an easier model for us to charge back to the plants based on what their production levels are, and the consumption of their compute, storage, and other resources is charged back in that manner.”

  • Additional managed services, support, and workloadspecific licensing and scalability costs. Each operational workload used its own licensing components, with distinct charges for transaction loads, switching functions, reconciliation activities, and distributed processing. Smart manufacturing deployments activated more widespread components for remote data flows and middleware balancing, while financial services systems concentrated their licensing on highvolume transactional requirements.
    The director of industrial automation at a smart manufacturing conglomerate shared how their organization strategically deployed HPE managed services in their environment: “They handle everything from the operating system, the network configuration, backup database, and even the help desk, [which is] integrated directly to HPE [such] that the system actually can call out for tech support itself. Pretty awesome, right?”

  • Pricing may vary. Contact HPE for additional details.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite deploys the HPE Nonstop Systems X environment with an upfront capital investment. Ongoing cost drivers include consumption costs related to their GreenLake private cloud environment, as well as managed services with 24/7 support.

  • In Year 1, 50% of the composite organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads are supported by HPE Nonstop Systems; this rises to 75% in Year 2 and 100% in Year 3.

Risks. The following factors could impact this cost for organizations:

  • An organization’s availability requirements for 24/7 services, including the number and nature of an organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads that are migrated to the Nonstop environment.

  • The Nonstop compute system selected, including whether an organization opts for consumption and/or premium support licensing.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $47.3 million.

“There’s a bifurcation of the pricing model, but the most important part of the cost model was not the cost itself, actually — it was the cost of not having Nonstop. … We think about the investment very simply. Nonstop is not inexpensive, but it replaces unpredictable, high-impact operational risk with the stable, predictable cost structure.”

IT operations leader, financial services

HPE Nonstop Systems
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 HPE Capital equipment and infrastructure upgrade costs Composite $0 $0 $0 $0
D2 Third-party implementation costs Composite $3,600,000 $0 $0 $0
D3 Subtotal: Capital and deployment expenditures Composite $3,600,000 $0 $0 $0
D4 HPE cumulative deployment curve A4 0% 50% 75% 100%
D5 Subtotal: Consumption Composite $0 $18,000,000 $18,000,000 $18,000,000
D6 Subtotal: Support Composite $0 $3,600,000 $3,600,000 $3,600,000
Dt HPE Nonstop Systems D3+(D5+D6)*D2 $3,600,000 $10,800,000 $16,200,000 $21,600,000
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Dtr HPE Nonstop Systems (risk-adjusted)   $3,960,000 $11,880,000 $17,820,000 $23,760,000
Three-year total: $57,420,000 Three-year present value: $47,338,512
Platform Deployment And Administration

Evidence and data. Interviewees described how their organizations implemented HPE Nonstop Systems with setup, application migration, and validation phases. In some cases (and depending on industry), interviewees reported extended deployment timelines due to regulatory and/or multisite operational scaling. They highlighted the following steps for deployment and administration of HPE Nonstop Systems:

  • Initial and ongoing training. Interviewees described a training process centered on building internal capability while maintaining continuity of existing operations. Initial training spanned roughly six months, during which internal staff learned from seasoned Nonstop practitioners and consultants. Learning continued after deployment as teams gradually assumed more responsibility from external providers. Annual training remained an ongoing investment as the team continued to strengthen inhouse operational proficiency.

  • Infrastructure preparation. During this phase, interviewees noted that their deployment teams were tasked with hardware installation, configuration, and regulatory alignment activities. Sitelevel engineers divided their responsibilities between maintaining existing systems and supporting the Nonstop environment to manage both legacy and modernized platforms in parallel.

  • Application migration and testing. The interviewees described the process of converting mainframe applications into rearchitected Nonstop equivalents. In some cases, added functionality within Nonstop systems expanded application footprints, rerearchitected legacy workloads, and established the technical model for further rollout. The final steps focused on validation and stabilization through functional, volume, and performance testing to validate operational reliability, culminating in controlled transitions to full production environments.

  • Ongoing scaling and management. Across all environments, interviewees noted tighter timelines for subsequent scaling and management efforts once initial startup efforts like obtaining regulatory approvals or establishing the first deployment template. The ongoing management of HPE Nonstop Systems required sustained commitment of internal engineering resources combined with continued reliance on external managed services.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Fifteen internal resources dedicate 50% of their time to deployment and training efforts for the initial six-month implementation period, decreasing to 50% by the end of Year 1 and 25% in Year 2.

  • To manage and scale usage of the platform once it is deployed, the composite organization dedicates 4.5 internal resources to administration in Year 1, 4.75 in Year 2, and 5 resources by the end of Year 3.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a resource involved in Nonstop deployment and administration is $175,000.

Risks. The following factors could impact this cost for organizations:

  • The number and nature of an organization’s tier one high-criticality workloads that are migrated to the Nonstop environment.

  • The fully burdened rate of deployment and administration resources.

  • The implementation requirements and skill sets available.

  • The total internal FTE effort required for ongoing administration.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $7.1 million.

“As per our KPIs, the target is to achieve at least 95% [deployment] within the next two years, and we will definitely be achieving that with these functionalities, modules, and the cutting-edge offerings.”

Business leader, smart manufacturing

Platform Deployment And Administration
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Internal resources devoted to deployment (FTEs) Composite 15 15 15 15
E2 Percentage of time that resources dedicate to deployment and training Composite 100% 50% 25% 0%
E3 Blended fully burdened annual salary of a deployment resource Composite $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000
E4 Subtotal: Deployment and training E1*E2*E3 $2,625,000 $1,312,500 $656,250 $0
E5 Internal resources dedicated to administration Composite $0 4.50 4.75 5.00
E6 Subtotal: Administration E3*E5 $0 $787,500 $831,250 $875,000
Et Platform deployment and administration E4+E6 $2,625,000 $2,100,000 $1,487,500 $875,000
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Etr Platform deployment and administration (risk-adjusted)          $2,887,500 $2,310,000 $1,636,250 $962,500
Three-year total: $7,796,250 Three-year present value: $7,062,913

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($6,847,500) ($14,190,000) ($19,456,250) ($24,722,500) ($65,216,250) ($54,401,425)
Total benefits $0 $33,209,455 $45,139,183 $57,068,911 $135,417,549 $110,372,241
Net benefits ($6,847,500) $19,019,455 $25,682,933 $32,346,410 $70,201,299 $55,970,816
ROI           103%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Nonstop Systems.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Nonstop Systems can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed HPE stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Nonstop Systems.

Interviews

Interviewed six decision-makers at organizations using Nonstop Systems to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feeds into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Source: Introducing Forrester’s OASIS Framework For Outcome-Driven Infrastructure Platforms, Forrester Research, Inc., November 4, 2025.

2 Source: The Top 10 Infrastructure Trends In 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., November 21, 2025.

3 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

4 Cumulative breach costs are computed using the composite organization’s size (revenue or number of employees) as an input to a regression analysis of reported total cumulative costs for all breaches for organizations that experienced at least one breach in the past 12 months. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2025. Q: “Using your best estimate, what was the total cumulative cost of all breaches experienced by your organization in the past 12 months?” Base: 1,740 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months. The cumulative breach cost is then multiplied by a 67% likelihood for organizations to experience one or more breaches in a given year. Q: “How many times do you estimate that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months?” Base: 2,643 global security decision-makers. Percentage of breaches by primary attack vector, as reported by security decision-makers whose organizations experienced at least one breach in the last 12 months. Q: “Of the times that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months, please indicate how many of each fall into the categories below.” Base: 1,766 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by HPE and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Nonstop Systems. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect’s business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Nonstop Systems based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse HPE or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, HPE and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and HPE make no warranties of any kind.

HPE reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

HPE provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Courtenay O’Connor

Published

February 2026