Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Google Workspace With Gemini

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Workspace

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Google, February 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Google Workspace With Gemini

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Google, February 2026

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Workspace

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Organizations are rethinking how employees work, collaborate, and access information as expectations rise for easier and more effective ways of getting work done. At the same time, the rapid evolution of AI has introduced opportunities and challenges, particularly as organizations determine how to best adopt it responsibly and at scale. In this environment, organizations are evaluating solutions that can simplify work, improve employee effectiveness, and support modern, AIaugmented ways of working.1

Google Workspace is a unified, cloudnative productivity suite that can enable employees across roles to collaborate efficiently, communicate with ease, and execute their daytoday work with greater effectiveness. Its advanced AI capabilities, including Gemini and NotebookLM, are embedded across familiar and easytouse applications such as Gmail, Drive, Meet, Docs, Sheets, and Slides and can enhance productivity while enabling employees to improve the quality of their work and take on higher-impact tasks. Workspace’s enterprisegrade security and data privacy protections can help organizations quickly and safely scale AI across the workforce to improve operational efficiency, enhance employee capability, and establish a foundation for longterm innovation.

Google commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Google Workspace.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Workspace on their organizations.

416%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$123.7M

Net present value (NPV)

 

“In one word, [the AI in Workspace] is transformative. Even people who are using it at the lowest levels are getting value. As you start to move up the adoption chain, productivity and upskill gains fly off the charts.”

Senior manager of workplace technologies, technology

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six decision-makers across five organizations with experience using Workspace. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is an organization with 20,000 employees.

Before adopting Workspace, interviewees’ organizations relied on legacy productivity solutions that often resulted in employees spending excess time on lowimpact activities like coordinating across tools, managing versions, and accessing information stored in siloed systems. Interviewees said their organizations sought a unified working experience to make collaboration and daytoday work easier, freeing employees to focus on creativity, decisionmaking, and higherimpact activities. Incorporating AI in a secure, scalable, and cost-effective way was important for the interviewees’ organizations as they wanted to empower employees and position themselves for longterm success.

After adopting Workspace, interviewees’ organizations saw significant improvements in productivity and collaboration, as well as in their ability to adopt secure, AIaugmented ways of working. Key results from the investment include stronger security and IT efficiency; increased employee productivity and AI usage with Gemini; more effective collaboration and workflow efficiency; and advanced AI use cases with NotebookLM and translation, which resulted in significant time savings and job retention.

“[The cost of Google Workspace] is very competitive. I would say that from a value standpoint, what we get from Google versus what other companies would provide is spectacular.”

Senior manager of workplace technologies, technology

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include the following:

  • By saving the average user 3 hours per week (150 hours annually), Gemini’s AI-powered assistance delivers 2.4 million hours in total annual time savings and improved work quality, creating a financial impact of $76.1 million. Gemini sits at the center of the composite organization’s AI strategy and impacts employee efficiency, capability, and quality of work output. Usage spans virtually all job roles and functions, with 80% of employees using Gemini regularly at the composite organization. Gemini is embedded directly into Workspace for an unfragmented experience within familiar tools and is used across a broad range of activities, including research and summarization; writing and improving text; translation; meeting preparation; understanding legal and technical documents; creating data overviews, marketing, and sales content; and coding and other technical tasks. Gemini also transforms entire workflows through Gems, which serve as specific customized AI experts that drive employee effectiveness, including for sales, operational, and teamspecific use cases. In addition to enhancing efficiency, Gemini serves as an assistant by helping the composite’s employees improve the quality of their work, take on more complex tasks, and operate with greater confidence and creativity.

“Our employees are better because of Gemini. Among our users, 93% are doing work faster and 89% report [it leads to] higher-quality work. They are also more creative because of Gemini, and 87% use it for creativity and idea generation.”

Head of AI adoption, financial services

  • AI use cases with NotebookLM and translation, saving up to 500,000 hours annually and retaining 1,200 jobs, which delivers $34.2 million in value. Teams at the composite organization, including those with several senior and knowledgeintensive roles (e.g., R&D, legal, finance, marketing, and operations), leverage NotebookLM to accurately and quickly understand and act on complex information in a single, trusted environment. These users see an average time savings of 10 hours per week by accelerating research, analysis, and content synthesis and generation. In addition, realtime translation and other AIpowered tools embedded throughout Workspace help upskill existing employees and support workforce retention as the composite organization grows and operates globally, allowing it to retain employees who would otherwise need to be replaced.

“We acquired a company of over 1,200 people and we’ve been able to keep the people with their institutional knowledge because of Gemini and the translation features in Workspace. There’s a ton of ROI because we haven’t had to replace people. We just get quick translations, use real-time translation in Google Meet, and overcome all those language barriers. It really makes being a global business easier and lets us leverage existing workforces [as we acquire new companies].”

VP of digital experience, financial services

  • Improved security and IT efficiency with cost savings from security tool consolidation, a 90% reduction in device configuration time, and a 50% reduction in tickets and ongoing management effort, saving $6.5 million. Workspace delivers the enterprisegrade security, data privacy protections, and control over organizational data that the composite organization requires to successfully deploy AIenabled tooling at scale across the workforce. These security and privacy protections extend across all Workspace applications and embedded AI capabilities, making it easier for the composite organization to approve, roll out, govern, and expand their use, while reducing organizational risk and the emergence of shadow IT. At the same time, Workspace’s cloud-native architecture and integrated security model support a strong overall security posture. Additionally, the composite realizes cost savings and efficiency gains, including retiring security tools no longer needed with Workspace in place and a reduction in the time needed for device configuration, tickets, and ongoing management.

“[That Google owns its own AI and delivers it as a fully integrated stack] is a big value for us. The way Google does their AI is different than other companies. Google gives us control over our data. That difference gave us the ability to deploy it so much faster. That’s a big, big value for us. It really was a game changer.”

VP of digital experience, financial services

  • Improved collaboration and workflow efficiency and saved 964,000 hours annually, totaling $30.7 million. As a single, cloudnative platform, Workspace enables employees at the composite organization to communicate and collaborate in real time using deeply integrated applications such as Gmail, Drive, Meet, Chat, Docs, Sheets, and Slides. Workspace supports fast communication and easy information sharing for office and frontline employees alike, reducing the time spent on collaborative activities at the composite by 30%. These efficiency gains extend to endtoend workflow orchestration using AppSheet alongside other Workspace apps, and AppSheet reduces app development time by an average of 80% compared to traditional approaches.

“[Gemini] is not replacing people; it’s empowering people to be more productive and improve the quality of their work.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

  • Cost savings from retiring legacy systems. Workspace serves as the composite organization’s enterprisewide productivity and collaboration suite for all employees, with Gemini and NotebookLM included at no additional cost. As a result, the composite organization decommissions legacy productivity tools and realizes direct cost savings.

“The fact that Google creates, owns, and maintains their own model is a significant advantage over competitors. It gives them the ability to maneuver and pivot much faster. Google’s in a unique situation by owning the model and being able to fine-tune the model directly to the use cases that they’re trying to develop. They have the ability to just move faster than anybody else.”

Manager of collaborative technologies, technology

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Greater employee confidence, creativity, and readiness to take on higher-impact work. With Workspace — especially with Gemini embedded across applications — employees at the composite organization complete existing work more efficiently and effectively and are empowered to take on more ambitious and unfamiliar tasks.

  • Improved organizational agility and innovation. Workspace provides a unified platform that enables the composite organization to experiment with new AIenabled ways of working, adapt more quickly to changing business needs, and support ongoing innovation.

  • AI technology leadership in a fast-evolving landscape. The composite organization views Google’s rapid pace of AI innovation and sustained investment as wellaligned with the demands of a fastevolving market. The current strength and continued enhancement of Workspace reduce the risk of technological stagnation and give leaders at the composite confidence that Workspace will keep advancing alongside emerging AI capabilities.

“What’s valuable for us is Google is an end-to-end solution in terms of AI, the applications, the infrastructure. Google is also open. If we want to use another solution, it can integrate within the Google infrastructure. The openness of Google helps us be more confident in adjusting our strategy.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Subscription costs. The composite organization pays subscription costs to Google for the use of Workspace. Factors like the number of users and customer-specific pricing drive these costs and total $19.3 million for the composite organization over three years.

  • Internal labor and migration costs. The composite organization incurs internal labor costs associated with its deployment and use of Workspace, including time dedicated IT staff spend on implementation, migration, and ongoing management, as well as time the broader workforce spends on learning and becoming familiar with Workspace and its AI capabilities. These costs total $10.4 million for the composite organization over three years.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $153.4 million over three years versus costs of $29.7 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $123.7 million and an ROI of 416%.

“The Workspace apps are improving all the time and very fast. Google is a leader in the market. I feel very confident about what they are doing now and where they are going in the future.”

Head of AI adoption, financial services

Key Statistics

416%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$153.4M

Benefits PV 

$123.7M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
AI-powered assistance with Gemini AI use cases with NotebookLM and translation Improved security and IT efficiency Improved collaboration and workflow efficiency Cost savings from retiring legacy systems

The Google Workspace Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Workspace investment
Interviews
Role Industry Number Of Employees Revenue
Senior manager of infrastructure Consumer goods 35,000 $7 billion
VP of digital experience Financial services 25,000 $5 billion
Senior manager of workplace technologies Technology 25,000 $10 billion
Manager of collaborative technologies Technology 25,000 $10 billion
Director of AI products Telecommunications 17,000 $3 billion
Head of AI adoption Financial services 12,000 $3 billion
Key Challenges

Before adopting Google Workspace, interviewees’ organizations relied on legacy collaboration suites along with point solutions as needed. Interviewees described struggling with common challenges in their prior environments, including:

  • Inefficient collaboration and too much time spent on low-impact work. Interviewees consistently described choosing Workspace because of its ability to support more effective collaboration than fragmented legacy environments, which made working together more cumbersome than necessary. In those prior states, employees spent significant time on low-impact activities such as managing versions, coordinating across multiple tools, and accessing information stored in siloed systems. The VP of digital experience in financial services explained: “We went with Workspace for the ability to collaborate better together, in the same document, in the same meeting. The more we break down the silos, the better we work.”

  • A need for AI-powered tools that enabled employees to take on higher-impact work. Interviewees said employees increasingly expected familiar and intuitive tools that enabled them to work more effectively. Their organizations sought AI-augmented tools that empowered employees to more easily complete their day-to-day work, leaving more time for analysis, creativity, and decision-making.
    The senior manager of workplace technologies in technology observed: “The AI in Workspace is accessible to anybody at any skill level. People get value with it from when they first start to dabble, and they can just keep going and going.” The head of AI adoption in financial services added, “We chose Workspace for collaboration as well as [its ability to] improve our work.”

  • Uncertainty around how to adopt AI safely and for the long term. Interviewees’ organizations were focused on deploying AI quickly while ensuring it would remain secure, wellgoverned, and capable of continuous improvement as the market evolved. Multiple interviewees likened the decision to “backing the right horse,” and favorably cited Google’s rapid pace of improvement, clear roadmap, enterprise security and privacy controls, and advantages as an integrated, endtoend solution. The head of AI adoption in financial services added: “Google has demonstrated they can move and improve very quickly. They’re a market leader.”
    Interviewees also noted technical challenges, such as reliability issues and potential security gaps, in their prior environments. These concerns reinforced the need for a more stable and secure foundation before expanding AI use at their organizations.

  • Cost and complexity of adopting AI at scale. Interviewees noted that scaling AI across the enterprise entailed cost and procurement considerations and could introduce operational complexity as tools needed to be licensed, integrated, and governed. Several interviewees emphasized that having Gemini and NotebookLM included as part of the Workspace subscription enabled enterprisewide AI adoption without incremental licensing costs or added complexity.

“Having Gemini and NotebookLM bundled and incorporated within Workspace would alone justify the move to Workspace. They help automate processes without the need for additional investment.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The composite organization is a global enterprise with 20,000 employees and $4 billion in annual revenue. All employees use Google Workspace, and 80% actively use Gemini. The organization has experimented with generative AI previously, but Workspace represents its first enterprisewide deployment of AI embedded across the full workforce.

  • Deployment characteristics. The composite’s deployment of Workspace includes a sixmonth implementation and migration effort led by an internal IT team, followed by ongoing management of the platform by a small subset of that same team. All employees spend initial time learning and getting familiar with Workspace and its AI capabilities, with continued learning as new features are introduced.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $4 billion in annual revenue

  • 20,000 employees

  • All employees are Workspace users

  • 80% of employees are Gemini users

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr AI-powered assistance with Gemini $30,600,000 $30,600,000 $30,600,000 $91,800,000 $76,097,671
Btr AI use cases with NotebookLM and translation $11,400,000 $13,900,000 $16,400,000 $41,700,000 $34,172,802
Ctr Improved security and IT efficiency $2,019,780 $2,562,030 $3,375,405 $7,957,215 $6,489,536
Dtr Improved collaboration and workflow efficiency $12,336,000 $12,336,000 $12,336,000 $37,008,000 $30,677,806
Etr Cost savings from retiring legacy systems $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $7,200,000 $5,968,445
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $58,755,780 $61,798,030 $65,111,405 $185,665,215 $153,406,260
AI-Powered Assistance With Gemini

Evidence and data. Interviewees described Gemini as a transformative tool that sat at the center of their organizations’ AI strategies. All interviewees’ organizations conducted large-scale employee surveys to understand Gemini’s adoption and impact, resulting in particularly robust datasets detailing its effect on employee efficiency, capability, and quality of work output. Across all interviewees’ organizations, approximately 80% of employees used Gemini regularly. Gemini usage spanned nearly all job roles and functions, and interviewees consistently reported significant time savings. Beyond efficiency gains, interviewees emphasized that Gemini served as an assistant, allowing employees to improve the quality of their work, take on more complex tasks, and operate with greater confidence and creativity. Interviewees further highlighted the following benefits of Gemini:

  • Employee preference and widespread adoption. Interviewees consistently reported that Gemini was highly popular among their employees, with usage extending to essentially all job roles, including operations, HR, finance, legal, sales, marketing, IT, engineering, analytics, and R&D, as well as customerfacing teams, executive leadership, middle management, and frontline staff. The VP of digital experience in financial services said: “Gemini is really powerful. Everybody is using it.”

  • Substantial employee time savings. All interviewees reported that Gemini resulted in substantial time-savings across the workforce, averaging 3 to 5 hours per week per user. The VP of digital experience explained: “Across all business units, the average user saves about an hour a day using Gemini, which is an incredible number. It has freed them up to do other work. We saw a lot of gains from rolling out Gemini, and 80% of our end users are actively using it.”

  • Workflow transformation. The head of AI adoption in financial services added: “Gemini not only saves time but transforms entire workflows. Some tasks have been reduced from hours to minutes.”

  • Gemini integration into Workspace apps. Interviewees highlighted that Gemini’s deep integration across Workspace apps created an unfragmented AI experience. The VP of digital experience in financial services explained: “Everything in Workspace has an integration with Gemini. It’s woven in and very, very helpful. I don’t have to open another window. In Docs, there’s Gemini prompting right there. In Meet, it can take notes and create action items.” The director of AI products in telecommunications added, “Gemini is embedded in Meet, so I can focus on the discussion instead of writing things down.”

“Gemini has been a massive success as 78% of users interact with it daily, and there’s a CSAT [customer satisfaction] of 83%. There are tangible and measurable impacts, as 95% report an increase in their productivity.”

Head of AI adoption, financial services

  • Improved quality of employee work output. In addition to substantial productivity gains, interviewees repeatedly observed that Gemini improved the quality of work output. The head of AI adoption said, “Gemini improves the speed and quality of employee work.” The director of AI products added, “[Among our employees], 92% said Gemini inspired innovative ways of working, and 80% said it improved the quality of their work.”

  • Broad range of AI use cases across roles and functions. At interviewees’ organizations, most employees used Gemini daily across a broad range of use cases, including research and summarization; writing and improving text; translation; idea generation; meeting preparation; understanding contracts and legal documents; data overviews; marketing content creation; and coding and other technical tasks. The senior manager of infrastructure added: “Around 80% of our employees are using Gemini every day. They are unlocking a lot of value. They are increasing their productivity. They are working faster. It creates a mindset change.”

  • Clearer, higher-quality employee communications. Interviewees noted that Gemini was frequently used to improve the clarity and effectiveness of employee communications. The head of AI adoption reported that 79% of Gemini users at their company used it to write, improve, or correct texts. The senior manager of infrastructure added, “[Gemini] improves the clarity of employee communications and also makes the information in them more objective.”

  • Augmented employee capabilities. Interviewees said Gemini allowed employees to complete work they previously avoided or were unable to execute and lowered the barrier to tasks like creating effective presentations, analyzing data, generating ideas, and coding.

  • Greater employee confidence and willingness to take on complex work. Interviewees emphasized that Gemini augmented employee capability rather than replacing it and expanded what both office and frontline workers could take on. The manager of collaborative technologies said: “Gemini is augmentation. It is enhancing people’s capability. I love the stories from our users saying they are more confident and that they take on bigger challenges.”

  • More effective video creation. Some interviewees noted that their organizations used Google Vids and said it greatly expanded the number of employees who could effectively create video content by simplifying the process of scripting, recording, and editing. The director of AI products shared that Vids reduced video creation processes from a full day to less than an hour.

“We sent out an internal survey about Gemini, and our users were incredibly quick to respond. We never saw a survey response like that before. We gleaned literally thousands of stories about what they’re doing with Gemini and the value they see on their efficiency, their capability, their capacity, and so on. They’re reporting a 25% increase in the quality of their work. They’re not only doing it faster — they’re doing it better.”

Manager of collaborative technologies, technology

  • More time for high-impact work. Time savings from Gemini allowed employees at the interviewees’ organizations to focus on more strategic and impactful work. The VP of digital experience in financial services said: “[With Gemini], we’re doing better work and we’re doing it in less time, so we’re able to reallocate the time savings to other areas. We’re seeing it all over the place at the beginning of this AI gold rush.”

  • Reusable, lightweight agentic workflows with Gems. Interviewees also highlighted Gems as a valuable component of Gemini, offering lightweight agentic workflows that employees could build and reuse. The senior manager of workplace technologies in technology said, “Gems delivers amazing value.”

  • Quality improvements and cost savings enabled by Gems. The director of AI products in telecommunications explained that Gems delivered quality improvements and cost savings in finance and HR workflows: “We use Gems to understand internal budgeting requests, so we have better quality [during the budgeting process]. We also use Gems for the HR personality assessment and there’s a cost savings.”

  • Gems improving sales team performance. Sales teams leveraged Gems to improve performance, as the manager of collaborative technologies stated: “We have a sales Gem. Salespeople think it’s great and use it all the time. With the help of our expert salespeople, we’ve built Gemini coaches to help sales. The coach knows their quota, their territory, and it’s skilled in motivating them.”

  • Revenue growth. The same interviewee elaborated on how Gemini drove revenue growth more broadly: “[With Gemini, the sales team can] put together quotes and opportunities at a much faster pace, which can translate into to more business. So helping sell more and sell faster — to both existing and new customers — is increasing revenue.”

“Gems is a powerful part of Gemini. It’s a functionality that gives people a taste of agentic AI.”

VP of digital experience, financial services

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • There are 20,000 employees, 80% of whom regularly use Gemini.

  • Users save 3 hours per week on average due to Gemini. This results in 2.4 million hours saved annually across the organization.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for employees is $30.

  • The productivity recapture rate for employees is 50%. This means employees convert 50% of their saved time into productive time.

Risks. The benefit of AI-powered assistance with Gemini will vary based on:

  • The extent of Gemini adoption.

  • The tools and AI capabilities available to employees before Gemini.

  • The number of employees and their fully burdened hourly salary.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $76.1 million.

AI-Powered Assistance With Gemini
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Total Workspace users Composite 20,000 20,000 20,000
A2 Percentage of users leveraging Gemini Interviews 80% 80% 80%
A3 Users leveraging Gemini A1*A2 16,000 16,000 16,000
A4 Average time saved per week per user due to Gemini (hours) Interviews 3 3 3
A5 Organizationwide hours saved with Gemini A3*A4*50 2,400,000 2,400,000 2,400,000
A6 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee Composite $30 $30 $30
A7 Productivity recapture TEI standard 50% 50% 50%
At AI-powered assistance with Gemini A5*A6*A7 $36,000,000 $36,000,000 $36,000,000
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Atr AI-powered assistance with Gemini (risk-adjusted)   $30,600,000 $30,600,000 $30,600,000
Three-year total: $91,800,000 Three-year present value: $76,097,671
AI Use Cases With NotebookLM And Translation

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported AI use cases centered on NotebookLM and the automatic translation capabilities embedded throughout Workspace. Teams that worked with large volumes of information heavily leveraged NotebookLM, especially senior employees who needed to synthesize, understand, and act on data as its structured outputs and clear citations based on user-provided sources helped ensure accuracy and trust. Interviewees reported that these users saw substantial time savings of 10 to 12 hours per week per user on average. Furthermore, interviewees reported that Workspace’s real-time translation and other AIpowered tools upskilled existing employees and supported workforce retention. For example, the VP of digital experience said these features enabled their financial services organization to retain more than 1,000 employees as it integrated acquired companies into global teams. Interviewees further highlighted the following benefits:

  • Broad, crossfunctional adoption of NotebookLM. Several interviewees reported broad adoption of NotebookLM, especially among document- and information-heavy departments. The senior manager of infrastructure in consumer goods noted: “We have a lot of NotebookLM users. Marketing, R&D, finance, IT, and operations and logistics are the top five areas using it. They use NotebookLM to summarize documents and information and create emails, images, and videos.”

  • High value for senior employees. NotebookLM particularly benefited senior employees whose functions focused on understanding and acting on large volumes data. The head of AI adoption in financial services reported: “We’re using NotebookLM a lot and it’s fantastic. Senior employees who manage a lot of information love it. It orders data and makes it easy to find what is needed. It’s very useful.”

  • Support for core business objectives. Interviewees described a wide range of NotebookLM use cases that drove business value, such as consolidating sales enablement materials to support revenue generation, analyzing market trends, supporting legal review, and enabling learning management initiatives such as short videos that lay out complex concepts in simple terms.

  • Improved contract analysis and supplier management. The head of AI adoption in financial services explained that NotebookLM improved contract analysis and supplier management: “We use NotebookLM to manage the contracts we have with suppliers. It’s very, very useful for understanding the specific terms. It improves productivity and work quality.”

  • Enhanced customer insights and internal communications. Marketing teams used NotebookLM to analyze customer data and share insights across the business. The senior manager of infrastructure in consumer goods said: “Marketing uses NotebookLM for understanding customer data, surveys, and the trends. They [frequently use the] podcast and video summarization [features]. NotebookLM summarizes information on specific products to share with our internal teams.”

  • Improved retail and inventory management. The same interviewee reported that NotebookLM enabled an internal chatbot to support physical stores to help improve administrative and inventory management. The interviewee explained: “We have a chatbot using NotebookLM with all the standardized information for stores to get immediate and accurate answers [about inventory, campaigns, and management] without having to wait.”

“In our internal surveys, the most preferred tool is NotebookLM. It creates information in a more executive way. We have a lot of people in R&D that need to compare [data points], read papers, and perform research. With NotebookLM, they can do this in hours instead of days. It’s bringing them value. It’s concentrated in one environment.”

Senior manager of infrastructure, consumer goods

  • Retention of acquired workforces enabled by realtime translation. The VP of digital experience noted that their financial services organization leveraged Workspace’s real-time translation to retain existing workforces as it acquired new companies. The interviewee explained: “We wouldn’t be able to absorb new companies and employees the way we’re doing [without Workspace]. We’d have to rehire.”

  • Upskilling and retention. The same interviewee elaborated on how Gemini, real-time translation, and the broader Workspace suite upskilled existing employees and made their retention possible: “A lot of times when we acquired a company in the past, we pretty much had to replace most of the people to get the skill sets that we need. But we’re able to leverage these existing workforces much easier with the Workspace tools.”

  • Broader employee upskilling through embedded AI assistance. More broadly, interviewees said Workspace helped augment the skill sets of existing employees. With AI assistance embedded directly into their everyday tools, employees were able to take on work that previously required more specialized skills, such as data analysis, content creation, and technical tasks.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • There are 10 teams leveraging NotebookLM in Year 1. This increases to 15 in Year 2 and 20 in Year 3. There are 50 employees per team on average.

  • Due to NotebookLM, these employees save 10 hours per week on average. This results in 250,000 hours saved annually across the organization in Year 1, 375,000 hours in Year 2, and 500,000 hours in Year 3.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for NotebookLM users is $50.

  • The productivity recapture rate for employees is 50%. This means employees convert 50% of their saved time into productive time.

  • Due to AI-powered translation with Workspace, 400 employees who would otherwise need to be replaced are retained. The hiring costs avoided per retained employee is $20,000.

“[The AI in Workspace] is accessible and provides value at any level. When employees go into NotebookLM and create an infographic, it’s amazing. Similarly, with Veo or Vids there is a lot of delight. It helps with adoption. The product sells itself.”

Manager of collaborative technologies, technology

Risks. The benefit of advanced AI use cases with NotebookLM and translation will vary based on:

  • Employee roles and the adoption rate of NotebookLM.

  • The extent to which translation and other AI features in Workspace are used to upskill and retain employees.  

  • The tools used prior to the implementation of Workspace.

  • The average fully burdened salary of employees.

  • Hiring costs.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $34.2 million.

10 hours per week

Time saved per NotebookLM user

More than 1,000

Employees retained due to the global translation and AI in Workspace

AI Use Cases With NotebookLM And Translation
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Teams leveraging NotebookLM for specialized use cases Composite 10 15 20
B2 Employees per team Composite 50 50 50
B3 Average time saved per week per employee due to NotebookLM (hours) Interviews 10 10 10
B4 Organizationwide hours saved with NotebookLM B1*B2*B3*50 250,000 375,000 500,000
B5 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee using NotebookLM Composite $50 $50 $50
B6 Productivity recapture TEI standard 50% 50% 50%
B7 Financial benefit of NotebookLM B4*B5*B6 $6,250,000 $9,375,000 $12,500,000
B8 Employees retained due to global translation with Workspace Interviews 400 400 400
B9 Hiring costs avoided per retained employee Composite $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
B10 Financial benefit of retaining employees due to global translation with Workspace B8*B9 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 $8,000,000
Bt AI use cases with NotebookLM and translation B7+B10 $14,250,000 $17,375,000 $20,500,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Btr AI use cases with NotebookLM and translation (risk-adjusted)   $11,400,000 $13,900,000 $16,400,000
Three-year total: $41,700,000 Three-year present value: $34,172,802
Improved Security And IT Efficiency

Evidence and data. Interviewees emphasized that secure AI was critical for their organizations. They said Google consistently provided the requisite enterprisegrade security, data privacy protections, and control over organizational data across the entire Workspace platform and its AI capabilities. More broadly, interviewees identified Workspace’s cloudnative architecture, centralized identity and access management, and integrated security model as supporting a strong overall security posture. While interviewees did not assess improved security primarily through an ROI lens, they nevertheless reported meaningful cost savings and efficiency gains, including the ability to retire or consolidate security solutions that were no longer necessary with Workspace in place and significant time savings in administering the platform. Interviewees typically reported that Workspace required approximately 50% less IT effort to manage and maintain compared to legacy systems, decreased help desk tickets by about 50%, and reduced the time required to configure new workstations by an average of 90%. Interviewees further highlighted the following security and IT efficiency benefits:

  • Enterprise-grade privacy protections. Interviewees said that Google’s enterprise-grade privacy protections were a major factor in deciding to invest in Workspace. The senior manager of workplace technologies in technology concluded, “We feel very confident in the security that Google provides.”

  • The preferred platform of security teams. The same interviewee said that Workspace was the preferred platform of their security team: “Our security team had a big say when we were deciding whether to invest in Google Workspace, and they wanted it because they felt it was easier to secure. Our security team has a very positive viewpoint and is very impressed with the level of security.”

  • Secure AI usage. Interviewees noted that these security and privacy protections applied to the entire Workspace portfolio, making it easy to approve the AI tools that were rapidly adopted and increasingly central to how employees worked. The manager of collaborative technologies in technology explained: “I can tell our employees that Gemini, NotebookLM, the whole portfolio [of AI tools in Workspace] is what we are providing because they’re secure. It’s a nice, simple message that I can convey, and I don’t have to qualify it. It’s an advantage that Google has.”

  • A unified security approach. This unified security approach also allowed interviewees’ organizations to quickly roll out new Workspace apps or features. The director of AI products in telecommunications said, “A benefit is that whenever we start trying a Workspace application, such as NotebookLM or Workspace Studio or something new, we can be assured that it’s within the umbrella of Google security and we can easily deploy it.”

“Workspace helps us a lot in terms of security. Google security is better than what we are using internally. … We’re confident in Google’s privacy practices. Not having to worry about security makes us confident that we can easily adapt.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

  • Google’s fully integrated AI stack. Interviewees also said that Google’s approach of creating, owning, and delivering AI as part of a fully integrated stack gave them greater confidence in data privacy and governance and enabled faster deployment of AI capabilities than approaches relying on third parties. Interviewees said this approach also positioned Google to innovate and evolve its AI capabilities more rapidly than others.

  • Secure, high-quality AI tools and shadow IT avoidance. Providing secure, approved, high-quality AI tools with Workspace helped prevent the emergence of shadow IT and its attendant risk at interviewees’ organizations. The director of AI products explained: “If the company did not take action [by adopting the Workspace AI tools], one thing for certain is that employees would pursue these tools in their personal capacity and that would contribute to shadow IT. ... Those unofficial solutions could have security issues and issues in terms of data leakage.”

  • Cost savings from consolidating redundant security tools. With Workspace, interviewees primarily focused on the risk reduction and data protection benefits of superior security rather than cost savings. Nevertheless, Workspace allowed interviewees’ organizations to decommission various point solutions (e.g., tools for anti-spam and antiphishing, encryption, and data loss prevention) since those capabilities were covered within Workspace. The director of AI products said: “We’ve retired security solutions, such as anti-spam. We don’t see an incremental value of having that since Google Workspace already has anti-spam capabilities.”

  • Simplified and more efficient IT administration. Workspace was also significantly easier to administer than interviewees’ organizations’ legacy solutions, as Workspace’s cloud-native architecture reduced the need for manual installation, patching, and ongoing maintenance.

“We’ve seen a lot of IT productivity improvement with our move to Google Workspace. We are in the cloud. We don’t need to install applications. There are a lot fewer tickets. It’s a big deal. Even our C-suite mentioned the difference.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Due to the enhanced security of Workspace, third-party anti-spam and antiphishing solutions are decommissioned over time. The cost savings from decommissioning these tools is $275,000 in Year 1, $412,500 in Year 2, and $618,750 in Year 3.

  • Due to the enhanced security of Workspace, third-party encryption solutions are decommissioned over time. The cost savings from decommissioning these tools is $330,000 in Year 1, $495,000 in Year 2, and $742,500 in Year 3.

  • Due to the enhanced security of Workspace, third-party data loss prevention (DLP) solutions are decommissioned over time. The cost savings from decommissioning these tools is $600,000 in Year 1, $900,000 in Year 2, and $1,350,000 in Year 3.

  • Prior to Workspace, the IT team spends 10,000 hours a year configuring new devices. With Workspace, this is reduced by 90%.

  • Prior to Workspace, the IT team spends 16,640 hours dedicated to help desk tickets and ongoing solution management. With Workspace, this is reduced by 50%.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for IT employees is $60.

“We don’t have tickets with Workspace. We had around 150 tickets per month [with our legacy solution] about installation, reinstallation, and so on. We don’t have those tickets anymore.”

Senior manager of infrastructure, consumer goods

Risks. The benefit of improved security and IT efficiency will vary based on:

  • The cost of third-party security solutions and what the organization decommissions given the enhanced security of Workspace.

  • The legacy solution and the time required to manage it.

  • The time it takes to configure a new device with the legacy solution. 

  • The skill set of the IT team.

  • The fully burdened hourly salary of IT employees.

  • The security strategy and needs of the organization.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6.5 million.

50%

Reduction in tickets and ongoing management  

90%

Reduction in device configuration time

Improved Security And IT Efficiency
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Cost savings from decommissioned anti-spam and antiphishing solutions Interviews $275,000 $412,500 $618,750
C2 Cost savings from decommissioned encryption solutions Interviews $330,000 $495,000 $742,500
C3 Cost savings from consolidating and decommissioning DLP solutions Interviews $600,000 $900,000 $1,350,000
C4 Cost savings from consolidating and decommissioning legacy security solutions C1+C2+C3 $1,205,000 $1,807,500 $2,711,250
C5 IT time spent configuring new devices with legacy product (hours) Composite 10,000 10,000 10,000
C6 Reduction in time to configure new devices with Workspace Interviews 90% 90% 90%
C7 Time saved configuring new devices with Workspace (hours) C5*C6 9,000 9,000 9,000
C8 Time dedicated to help desk tickets and ongoing solution management for legacy system (hours) Composite 16,640 16,640 16,640
C9 Reduction in tickets and ongoing solution management with Workspace Interviews 50% 50% 50%
C10 Time saved due to reduction in tickets and ongoing solution management with Workspace (hours) C8*C9 8,320 8,320 8,320
C11 IT time saved with Workspace (hours) C7+C10 17,320 17,320 17,320
C12 Fully burdened hourly rate for an IT employee Composite $60 $60 $60
C13 Financial benefit of IT efficiency with Workspace C11*C12 $1,039,200 $1,039,200 $1,039,200
Ct Improved security and IT efficiency C4+C13 $2,244,200 $2,846,700 $3,750,450
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ctr Improved security and IT efficiency (risk-adjusted)   $2,019,780 $2,562,030 $3,375,405
Three-year total: $7,957,215 Three-year present value: $6,489,536
Improved Collaboration And Workflow Efficiency

Evidence and data. Interviewees emphasized that a core value proposition of Workspace was enabling more effective and efficient collaboration across teams. Interviewees said Workspace eliminated silos and served as a single platform where employees could communicate, collaborate, and work together in real time. Interviewees estimated that these improvements reduced time spent on collaborative activities by approximately 30% on average. For several interviewees’ organizations, these efficiency gains extended to end-to-end workflow orchestration using AppSheet alongside other Workspace apps. Interviewees at these organizations reported that AppSheet enabled the fast development of workflow and automation solutions, reducing app development time by an average of 80% compared to traditional approaches. Interviewees further highlighted the following collaboration and workflow benefits:

  • Workspace as a comprehensive platform. Interviewees reflected that Workspace served as a comprehensive platform that made it easy for employees to work together and empowered them to do their best work. The senior manager of workplace technologies in technology added, “Workspace is the central point of all communication, collaboration, and productivity at our company.”

  • Deep integration across all apps. Interviewees noted that Workspace applications, such as Gmail, Drive, Meet, Chat, Docs, Sheets, and Slides, along with Gemini and NotebookLM, were deeply integrated within the same cloud environment. This integration simplified how employees searched for information, collaborated in meetings, and communicated regarding content creation and work delivery.

  • Ease of use. Workspace’s ease of use helped improve collaboration. The senior manager of infrastructure in consumer goods stated: “With Workspace, people started collaborating more. Collaboration [with Workspace] is very easy, and you don’t need to explain the tools.”

  • Faster onboarding and time to productivity. Interviewees also said that Workspace’s intuitive design helped new employees onboard and become productive faster, which was especially important for large enterprises and organizations undergoing growth or acquisition. The VP of digital experience in financial services said: “Workspace is more intuitive than other platforms. It really helps people get up to speed. [New employees] are onboarded and up to speed much quicker.”

  • Version control and real-time collaboration. Interviewees said Workspace excelled at maintaining version control, enabling employees to work in the same files and ensuring that anyone who needed access could view or edit the latest version at any time. Interviewees identified Drive as a key piece of this model, as it allowed files to be centrally stored and easily shared. In addition, Gmail, Meet, and Chat served as primary communication channels, allowing both office and frontline employees to coordinate work, share updates, and collaborate in real time across devices and roles.

“The value of Workspace is being able to take a different approach on how we work with our platforms and each other. Workspace emphasizes collaboration — in documents, decks, and meetings. It allows for a mindset of working better together.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

  • Workflow orchestration with AppSheet. Interviewees also described how Workspace enabled endtoend workflow orchestration, particularly through AppSheet, which allowed for fast no-code application development. Interviewees described using AppSheet to build and modify widely used inventory management, HR clearance, and ecommerce apps in weeks rather than months, integrating natively with Workspace apps as needed (e.g., communications automatically flowed into Docs and Sheets, were placed in Drive, and then summarized by Gemini).

  • Faster app development. The director of AI products reported: “With AppSheet, there has been about an 80% reduction in app development time, and we have more than 1,000 AppSheet apps actively used right now in the company.”

  • No-code development that reduces time and cost. Interviewees said AppSheet is an easy-to-use, no-code platform that allows end users to directly solve pain points they identify in their own workstreams. This reduced reliance on software development teams and allowed them to focus on high-priority initiatives. The interviewee at the telecommunications company estimated that using AppSheet instead of traditional methods saved approximately $6.0 million.

  • AppSheet’s ease of use, including for long-tail and niche workflows. Given its ease of use, interviewees said AppSheet was sometimes leveraged for niche use cases that would otherwise remain overlooked. More broadly, interviewees’ organizations used AppSheet alongside other Workspace apps to address long-tail automation needs and streamline specialized workflows.

“Our company is more than 100 years old, and we’ve never been in a better position than we are right now. Google Workspace has helped us through our transformation. We’re nimbler and getting more out of our workers. We’ve acquired several companies the last few years, and Workspace has made it easy to integrate with these new coworkers and business units.”

VP of digital experience, financial services 

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • There are 20,000 Workspace users, and they spend an average of 3 hours per week in collaborative activities.

  • Due to Workspace, users save 30% of their time spent in collaborative activities. This results in 900,000 hours saved annually across the organization.

  • There are 40 workflows or automated solutions created with AppSheet. Prior to AppSheet, the average time to develop such solutions was 2,000 hours each.

  • Due to AppSheet, there is an 80% reduction in development time. This results in 64,000 hours saved annually across the organization.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for all employees using Workspace is $30.The fully burdened hourly rate for employees developing workflows and automated solutions is $60.

  • The productivity recapture rate for employees is 50%. This means employees convert 50% of their saved time into productive time.

“Where Google Workspace really surpasses [alternatives] is the synergy between the apps and the ability of the apps to act as a seamless integration.”

Senior manager of workplace technologies, technology

Risks. The benefit of improved collaboration and workflow efficiency will vary based on:

  • The adoption rate of Workspace and the amount of time users spend in collaborative activities.

  • The adoption rate of AppSheet and the number of apps developed.

  • The tools used prior to the implementation of Workspace.

  • The average fully burdened salary of employees.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $30.7 million.

30%

Improved efficiency for collaborative activities  

80%

Faster app development with AppSheet  

Improved Collaboration And Workflow Efficiency
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Total Workspace users Composite 20,000 20,000 20,000
D2 Average time spent each week in collaborative work per user (hours) Composite 3 3 3
D3 Total organizationwide collaborative time (hours) D1*D2*50 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
D4 Time saved in collaborative activities with Workspace Interviews 30% 30% 30%
D5 Organizationwide time saved due to improved collaboration with Workspace (hours) D3*D4 900,000 900,000 900,000
D6 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee Composite $30 $30 $30
D7 Productivity recapture TEI standard 50% 50% 50%
D8 Financial benefit of improved collaboration with Workspace D5*D6*D7 $13,500,000 $13,500,000 $13,500,000
D9 Workflows or automated solutions created with AppSheet Composite 40 40 40
D10 Average time to develop workflows or automated solutions before AppSheet (hours) Composite 2,000 2,000 2,000
D11 Time saved with AppSheet (percentage) Interviews 80% 80% 80%
D12 Time saved with AppSheet (hours) D9*D10*D11 64,000 64,000 64,000
D13 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee developing workflows and automated solutions Composite $60 $60 $60
D14 Productivity recapture TEI standard 50% 50% 50%
D15 Financial benefit of AppSheet D12*D13*D14 $1,920,000 $1,920,000 $1,920,000
Dt Improved collaboration and workflow efficiency D8+D15 $15,420,000 $15,420,000 $15,420,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Dtr Improved collaboration and workflow efficiency (risk-adjusted)   $12,336,000 $12,336,000 $12,336,000
Three-year total: $37,008,000 Three-year present value: $30,677,806
Cost Savings From Retiring Legacy Systems

Evidence and data. Interviewees said that Workspace served as a comprehensive collaboration suite for their organizations, supporting both officebased and frontline employees while also including enterprise AI capabilities for all users. As a result, Workspace replaced existing legacy collaboration and productivity systems, enabling interviewees’ organizations to retire those solutions and realize direct cost savings. Interviewees further highlighted the following benefits:

  • Competitive pricing and high platform value. Interviewees consistently said that Workspace delivered significant value and was priced competitively. For example, the VP of digital experience in financial services summarized: “Workspace is priced very competitively. … It includes all the AI tools.”

  • AI capabilities included at no additional cost. Multiple interviewees noted that having Gemini and NotebookLM included within Workspace at no additional cost was a strong advantage of the platform, increasing its value and eliminating the need to procure separate AI solutions.

  • Flexible integration without vendor lockin. Interviewees also said that Workspace’s ability to integrate with other enterprise systems meant they could adjust their strategies over time without being locked into rigid architectures and use alternative solutions for specific users or use cases if desired.

“Workspace is definitely worth the cost. It includes Gemini for free, and that’s a huge part of the benefit.”

VP of digital experience, financial services

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the composite organization decommissions legacy systems after implementing Workspace, saving $3.0 million annually.

Risks. The benefit of cost savings from retiring legacy systems will vary based on:

  • The cost of legacy systems and how quickly they are decommissioned.

  • The extent of decommissioning and whether any solutions are retained in part.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6.0 million.

“Gemini exceeded our initial expectations. Our expectations have grown and Gemini is still exceeding expectations with new capabilities, such as video generation, image generation, Nano Banana, and [improved] coding assistance. Gemini has improved immensely over the last year.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

Cost Savings From Retiring Legacy Systems
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Cost of retired legacy systems Interviews $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Et Cost savings from retiring legacy systems E1 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Etr Cost savings from retiring legacy systems (risk-adjusted)   $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,400,000
Three-year total: $7,200,000 Three-year present value: $5,968,445
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Greater employee confidence, creativity, and readiness to take on higher-impact work. Interviewees said that Workspace, especially with Gemini embedded across applications, enabled employees to take on more ambitious work, made work easier, and improved the quality of their output. The manager of collaborative technologies in technology said: “What’s most exciting is the energy and innovation that’s coming out across the organization due to employees feeling more confident and capable with Gemini — and not just feeling it but literally being able to deliver on it. The personal transformation [for employees] is really exciting.”

The senior manager of workplace technologies in technology added: “One of the biggest values of Gemini is enabling employees to not only get their existing workloads done faster and better, but to also begin achieving things that were never possible. There are employees writing code who knew nothing about code; there are employees now creating amazing slide decks and presentations who weren’t before. Gemini is adding new skills to their repertoires that they would not have been able to accomplish prior.”

“Google Workspace, including Gemini, is essential to our work. We’re more collaborative and have improved the quality of our output.”

Director of AI products, telecommunications

  • Improved organizational agility and innovation. Workspace served as a unified platform that made it easier for interviewees’ organizations to experiment, adopt new ways of working, and innovate as business needs evolved. Interviewees described Workspace, and particularly the combination of AI tools with familiar applications and enterprisegrade security, as transformative. The director of AI products in telecommunications said their company already derived significant business value from Workspace, and added, “We are still not maximizing the capability of Gemini, Gems, and NotebookLM.”

  • AI technology leadership in a fast-evolving landscape. Interviewees expressed long-term confidence in Google as a partner and the strength of its AI stack, noting that there were constant improvements and innovations. The manager of collaborative technologies in technology added: “Google is uniquely positioned in terms of owning the generative AI model they deploy. They clearly have the cash flow to sustain huge development. And they make their own chips. There’s nobody else that has all three elements. They’re a very safe bet and innovate very quickly.”

“Security is a big reason [we use Google Workspace], as well as the speed and innovation of the platform. Google has innovated and added features at a much faster rate than other companies.”

Senior manager of workplace technologies, technology

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Workspace and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • A partnership with Google as Workspace develops. Several interviewees highlighted the importance of Google’s ongoing product development and collaborative approach. They expressed confidence in Workspace’s ability to deliver additional productivity and innovation gains over time as both the platform and their own organizations continue to evolve. Interviewees also noted their ability to help shape that direction. The director of AI products in telecommunications explained: “We can share our input to Google. It’s a partnership rather than a vendor and user relationship.” The same interviewee had visibility into future offerings, adding, “What I appreciate is that Google is sharing its roadmap.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

“Google’s focus is on the right balance of adding features and technology, coupled with simplicity and ease of use. That’s very important to us.”

Senior manager of workplace technologies, technology

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Ftr Subscription costs $0 $7,776,000 $7,776,000 $7,776,000 $23,328,000 $19,337,761
Gtr Internal labor and migration costs $6,382,500 $1,610,000 $1,610,000 $1,610,000 $11,212,500 $10,386,332
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $6,382,500 $9,386,000 $9,386,000 $9,386,000 $34,540,500 $29,724,093
Subscription Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees’ organizations paid annual subscription fees to Google for the use of Workspace, which included Gemini and NotebookLM at no extra cost. These costs varied by organization and were driven by the number of users and customer-specific pricing.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite pays $6,480,000 a year for its Workspace subscription.

  • All employees have Workspace accounts.

  • Pricing may vary. Contact Google for additional details.

Risks. The subscription costs will vary based on:

  • The number of users.

  • The preexisting relationship and contracts with Google.

  • Customer-specific pricing, including any discounts.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $19.3 million.

Subscription Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Subscription costs Interviews   $6,480,000 $6,480,000 $6,480,000
Ft Subscription costs F1   $6,480,000 $6,480,000 $6,480,000
  Risk adjustment 20%        
Ftr Subscription costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $7,776,000 $7,776,000 $7,776,000
Three-year total: $23,328,000 Three-year present value: $19,337,761
Internal Labor And Migration Costs

Evidence and data. At interviewees’ organizations, a group of employees dedicated their time to the implementation of Workspace. Thereafter, a subset of this team handled the ongoing management of the platform. More broadly, interviewees said that their workforces spent some initial time learning and gaining familiarity with Workspace, as well as some time thereafter deepening their understanding the scope of Workspace’s AI capabilities and any new features.

  • Implementations varied across interviewees’ organizations but were typically completed over the course of several months. Interviewees described migration as a significant effort but noted that they received substantial support from the Google team.

  • Interviewees described Workspace as user-friendly but did note that employees spent time gaining full familiarity with the platform. Their organizations also made ongoing training and enablement tools available, particularly related to Workspace’s AI features. The VP of digital experience in financial services explained: “We have a lot of education, a lot of training available. We have prompt libraries. We do cross-group contests.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Twelve FTEs are dedicated to the implementation of and migration to Workspace over the course of six months.

  • Four FTEs are dedicated to the ongoing management of Workspace thereafter.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for employees dedicated to the implementation and ongoing management of Workspace is $125,000.

  • There are 20,000 Workspace users. On average, these users spend 4 hours learning and getting comfortable with Workspace and another 4 hours gaining familiarity and proficiency with Workspace’s AI capabilities. Thereafter, they spend an average of 1.5 hours per year learning new AI features.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate across all employees is $30.

Risks. The cost of internal labor and migration will vary based on:

  • Company size.

  • The scope of the implementation.

  • Employee skill set and salary.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $10.4 million.

Internal Labor And Migration Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 FTEs dedicated to implementation, migration, and ongoing management Interviews 12 4 4 4
G2 Fully burdened annual salary for an FTE dedicated to implementation and ongoing management Composite $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000
G3 Length of implementation (months) Interviews 6      
G4 Workspace users Composite 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
G5 Average user time dedicated to learning and getting comfortable with Workspace (hours) Interviews 4.0      
G6 Average user time dedicated to gaining familiarity and proficiency with new AI features (hours) Interviews 4.0 1.5 1.5 1.5
G7 Fully burdened hourly rate for a user Composite $30 $30 $30 $30
Gt Internal labor and migration costs Initial: ((G1*G2*G3)/12)+ (G4*(G5+G6)*G7)
Y1 to Y3: (G1*G2)+(G4*G6*G7)
$5,550,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000
  Risk adjustment 15%        
Gtr Internal labor and migration costs (risk-adjusted)   $6,382,500 $1,610,000 $1,610,000 $1,610,000
Three-year total: $11,212,500 Three-year present value: $10,386,332

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($6,382,500) ($9,386,000) ($9,386,000) ($9,386,000) ($34,540,500) ($29,724,093)
Total benefits $0 $58,755,780 $61,798,030 $65,111,405 $185,665,215 $153,406,260
Net benefits ($6,382,500) $49,369,780 $52,412,030 $55,725,405 $151,124,715 $123,682,167
ROI           416%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Workspace.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Workspace can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Google stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Workspace.

Interviews

Interviewed six decision-makers across five organizations using Workspace to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Source: Predictions 2026: The Future Of Work, Forrester Research, Inc., October 21, 2025; Jump-Start Your AI-Ready Culture, Forrester Research, Inc., January 2, 2026

2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Google and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Workspace.

Google reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Google provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Matthew Carr

Published

February 2026

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Google Workspace