Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Fortinet, JUNE 2025

[CONTENT]

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Fortinet, JUNE 2025

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Businesses leverage cloud, IoT, AI, and other technologies to drive new revenue streams, enhance customer experiences, and reduce operating costs. These technologies force organizations to adopt new solutions, services, methodologies, and business strategies to reap the benefits of these technological advances. The largest transformation that extends across and beyond the business is embedding security directly into a network DNA, which means integrating security measures as an inherent part of the network’s architecture and operations rather than adding them as separate, bolted-on components. Separate, discrete systems introduce inefficiencies and risk as mistakes increase with repetitive tasks. Merging security and networking infrastructure and operations secures business operations, optimizes IT operations, reduces risk, and improves business value.

The Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution converges network and security management, monitoring, and AI into a single secure networking console. Merging security and networking helps streamline operations, improve observability, and enable automation. The Fortinet Secure LAN Edge provides secure networking across wired and wireless that integrates with Fortinet and third-party enterprise and security architecture for strong connectivity and simplified management.

Fortinet commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Fortinet Secure LAN Edge on their organizations.

308%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$9.9M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a global company generating $3 billion annually from business-to-business and business-to-consumer divisions

Interviewees said that prior to using Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, their organizations struggled to allocate enough resources to maintain multiple, hard-to-use, and disparate networking products that did not integrate with their security. As a result, the interviewees’ organizations were vulnerable to risks, outages, and scaling constraints as data and applications moved from data centers across the business to the edge and partners. IoT devices, now outnumbering traditional technology devices like laptops and printers, injected new risks. Isolated and disconnected security appliances, mostly residing in the data center, couldn’t secure workloads, devices, users, and data in the boundaryless infrastructure.

After investing in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the interviewees described how Fortinet’s FortiManager, FortiGate, FortiAP, and FortiSwitch converged security and networking into a single system. Implementing Fortinet Secure LAN Edge helped their organizations to decrease the level of internal labor and expertise needed for managing multiple legacy point products. The consolidated environment improved network availability and visibility, reduced security risk, and improved the interviewees’ organizations’ ability to nimbly scale to meet business objectives. By breaking down the security and network silos, it facilitated a consistent set of policies spanning user/device identity and context. Fortinet Secure LAN Edge also created a consistent user experience by applying these policies to users and devices wherever they reside and connecting to any resource, both cloud-based and on-premises.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Saved networking and security technology costs by 20%. By converging its legacy, siloed networking and security solutions with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite organization optimizes upgrade and refresh cycles. It deploys fewer point solutions and requires less specialization and expertise to maintain than prior solutions needed. With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite’s networking and security technology convergence is worth $5.0 million.

  • Recouped 70 hours of network downtime for improved revenue retention. With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, security and networking professionals at the composite have less components to configure, data to enter, and systems to integrate. The potential failure points and security holes decrease as does the amount of work required of the organization with simplification. This reduces unplanned downtime by 80%, facilitating an increase in both revenue retention as the composite stays online at a higher rate. The value of Fortinet’s improved network availability for the composite is $4.2 million.

  • Increased efficiency for network operations (NetOps) teams by 50%. In the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment, the composite organization increases NetOps FTEs efficiency by consolidating the management of wired, wireless, and security into one interface. Provisioning and making changes in one location creates a single pane of visibility, which enables operators to solve problems quicker instead of filtering through data from multiple systems, each with their structure and interfaces. For the composite organization, the value of eliminating redundant tasks across disparate and unique systems amounts to $1.3 million.

  • Increased network security response time by 75%. With improved visibility across security and networking components, the composite’s security team dedicates less time to investigating and resolving network-related risks since technology professionals are looking at the same data. The converged platform means that incident responders have fewer data sources to check with lower incident rates and false positives and faster resolution times for true events. The value of this improved network security response time for the composite is $653,000.

  • Reduced risk of breaches from external attacks by 60%. The Fortinet Secure LAN Edge protects the composite organization’s perimeter at connection points into the network, whether it is a wireless guest user or IoT device connecting. This heightened visibility also improves the composite’s security posture. Issues are caught at the edge of the network before damage can be done inside the technology infrastructure or business operations. This helps the composite organization reduce the cost of a potential material breach by $1.6 million.

  • Increased time to market by 50% for improved revenue and agility. By leveraging the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution to open new, revenue-generating branches, the composite cuts the time to open a branch in half. In doing so, it gains entry into new markets, grows market share, and improves the in-branch customer experience, resulting in revenue more quickly than if the composite used its legacy networking and security solutions. The value of this faster time to market is $344,000 for the composite organization.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • IT help desk optimization.

  • Cyber insurance retention.

  • A Fortinet roadmap, technology partnerships, and channel support.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Fortinet Secure LAN Edge infrastructure costs. The composite organization fully deploys FortiManager, FortiSwitches, FortiGates, and FortiAPs across its entire environment, deploying by the end of Year 2. Fortinet costs also include annual device and software support costs totaling $2.8 million.

  • Deployment expenses. The composite organization partially dedicates four technology resources to a Fortinet deployment. Over three years of phased implementation, the composite dedicates approximately 3,500 hours of internal FTE labor to implementation for a total of $241,000 in deployment costs.

  • Management costs. The composite organization partially dedicates up to 2.5 resources to managing Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. Over three years, this adds up to approximately 2,400 hours of management for a total of $147,000 in management costs.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $13.1 million over three years versus costs of $3.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $9.9 million and an ROI of 308%.

70 hours

Total recouped unplanned downtime reattributed to profitable and productive use in the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment

“By giving us the ability to manage all [our switches centrally], in essence, I saved about $3 million over the course of that three-year project and I get a few other benefits along with it. I also get to jettison all our … firewalls because once I get all the edge switches in place and we’re managing those … then I can actually turn any port into a mini firewall.”

Technology services manager, healthcare

Key Statistics

308%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$13.1M

Benefits PV 

$9.9M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback period 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Networking and security technology convergence Improved network availability Networking operational efficiencies Network security efficiencies Reduced cost of a material breach Improved profit and agility

The Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge investment
Interviews
Role Industry Region FTEs
Technology services manager Healthcare North America 29,000
IT security administrator Manufacturing Global, North America headquarters 500
CIO Retail North America 1,700
Technology leader Education North America 4,000
Key Challenges

Prior to their investments in Fortinet, interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Siloed and outdated networking and security technologies. Interviewees described how their organizations had separate, siloed networking and security teams and technologies. Access points and switches were often managed through different consoles that were not in sync with each other, requiring longer refresh and upgrade cycles that relied on costly labor and often risked widespread business disruption. By having discrete, disjointed components, the interviewees’ organizations couldn’t utilize automation capabilities since the hardware or software didn’t work together.

    The technology services manager in the healthcare industry shared: “If we just stayed with the [prior vendor], we would have to [refresh] about 1,800 switches. With the network access control [and other needed capabilities], it was probably going to run $17 million.”

  • Poor performance and availability of core network services. Interviewees discussed how their prior vendors for core technology, such as networking and Wi-Fi, had high levels of downtime from outages as well as slow and insufficient bandwidth. These issues contributed to further cascading malfunctions and caused frequent business disruption and productivity losses.

    The technology leader in the education industry said that their organization experienced downtime from network outages and rigid constraints, leading to performance degradation: “Prior [to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge], we had a good bit of downtime with wireless. We were having scalability issues where we were actually reaching caps for wireless. [Up] to 10,000 users were able to connect at a given time, [but] we need closer to 28,000, so we were desperate to get off the former solution. When we would reach those caps, we would have things that would restart or lose connection, which would then cause problems for our actual network switches, and then they would lose connection, too. We would not just have Wi-Fi down but have an entire location go down, so it [impacted] uptime for our entire network.”

  • Labor inefficiencies and talent shortages for networking teams. Interviewees noted that their teams needed to dedicate entire positions to maintaining individual technologies, such as voice over IP (VoIP) and telephony, just for basic maintenance and operations. These resources were frequently required to maintain certifications or high levels of expertise in scripting languages and specific technologies, and interviewees noted that their teams had limited cross training, which led to operational bottlenecks and business disruption.

    The technology leader in the education industry said: “Previously, we did a lot of scripting to manage our switches, and it limited who was able to actually work on them … because you had to have at least some basic knowledge of the scripting, [making it difficult] to manage for everybody [because] we’re putting firewalls at every school.”

  • Heightened risks and costly impacts of a network-related material breach. Most of the interviewees’ organizations were in industries that possessed highly sensitive personal information and needed to protect it. These organizations were therefore subject to heightened levels of social engineering, fraud, and cyberattacks. At the same time, the interviewees noted that their security and networking teams lacked the visibility across their product areas needed to effectively secure their network.

  • Limited engagement models. Interviewees discussed how their organizations’ legacy, siloed technology environments required lengthy, manual processes for provisioning and deploying new branches and sites. This hampered innovation and limited their abilities to engage customers and stakeholder groups and securely grow to meet business objectives.

“Our students are always trying to find a way to get past [our policies] or cause a little bit of havoc at the school.”

Technology leader, education

Investment Objectives For Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that embedded Zero Trust into their networks through a single system. The interviewees discussed how their growing organizations sought to replace aged-out equipment with a solution that would be compatible with their evolving hybrid cloud estates and the continual digital transformation that connected more IoT devices, partners, and customers into the network.

Interviewees reported that their organizations invested in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge because it offered an elegant, converged platform upon which their organizations could offer their end users strong connectivity and secure their organizations’ growth. In addition, the shift from per-hardware management to software-driven enabled higher levels of automation. They described that the converged security and network management software enabled their organizations to gain a high level of security that was embedded into the network infrastructure rather than bolted on, while deploying cost-effective and highly automated networking fabric.

“I like the fact that we’re relying on a security company for our network infrastructure versus what I’ve seen with others [where] the R&D was not there and the security was an afterthought, not an initial thought.”

Technology leader, industry education

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The global organization has both business-to-business and business-to-consumer divisions and is supported by 10,0000 FTEs. It generates $3 billion annually, with 15% of revenue derived from approximately 150 branches and sites. It spends $13 million on networking and security, with 12 FTEs in networking operations and four FTEs in security operations.

  • Deployment characteristics. Over the three-year period, the composite deploys FortiAP, FortiSwitch, and FortiGate firewalls.2 It also invests in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer. The composite deploys 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1, with full deployment completed by the end of Year 2.

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $3 billion in annual revenue

  • 10,000 employees

  • 150 sites

  • 11% operating margin

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Networking and security technology convergence $1,419,377 $2,365,628 $2,365,628 $6,150,634 $5,022,740
Btr Improved network availability $745,206 $1,788,494 $2,682,740 $5,216,440 $4,171,136
Ctr Networking operational efficiencies $369,049 $615,082 $615,082 $1,599,212 $1,305,951
Dtr Network security efficiencies $184,524 $307,541 $307,541 $799,606 $652,975
Etr Reduced cost of a material breach $447,592 $745,987 $745,987 $1,939,566 $1,583,891
Ftr Improved profit and agility $97,096 $161,827 $161,827 $420,751 $343,594
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $3,262,845 $5,984,559 $6,878,806 $16,126,209 $13,080,287
Networking And Security Technology Convergence

Evidence and data. In shifting to a Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment, interviewees reported that their organizations were able to converge their networking and security stacks. Whereas they previously needed highly specialized resources to manage high-maintenance on-prem and cloud-based networking environments, interviewees pointed to the streamlined operations and optimized technology stack with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. Interviewees detailed networking and security technology convergence benefits including:

  • Cost and labor savings. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge offered competitive cost savings while augmenting functionality and security. They also highlighted how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge lowered the labor and skilled expertise required to manage multiple vendors and freed up skilled headcount for higher-value activities.

    • The technology leader in the education industry said: “The Fortinet [investment] was twofold more cost-effective for network and wireless than [the competitor we considered], and the operating system being the same as the firewall was key for us. School districts have very few and limited resources with staffing, and we did not have to have [vendor-]certified engineers [with Fortinet].”

      Furthermore, the technology services manager in the healthcare industry shared that their organization was able to reallocate network administrators to higher-value activities. Instead of doing repetitive data entry work, their network administrators shifted towards solving strategic problems.
    • The CIO in the retail industry estimated that their organization saved up to $150,000 per year by streamlining their networking and security technologies with Fortinet: “We removed disparate [networking and security] solutions that did not communicate together and that were not patched or maintained with a centralized Fortinet solution. There were likely savings [of $100,000 to $150,000 annually] through consolidation because we had more ‘purchasing power’ by leveraging Fortinet everywhere.”

  • Optimized upgrade and refresh cycles. Interviewees highlighted how their organizations needed to support fewer upgrades and refreshes and that those cycles were more stable with less disruption. Taken together, interviewees noted how this made it easier to maintain the latest and most secure versions of their software:

    • The technology leader in the education industry said: “Fortinet has taken away a lot of our headaches as far as having challenges with [deploying upgrades and new versions of] products. [With Fortinet], we feel more comfortable staying up to date on the latest and greatest [threats] without breaking.”
    • The technology services manager in the healthcare industry shared that their addition of FortiManager to their networking environment with FortiSwitches and FortiGates helped eliminate the effort needed to configure switches for technology updates, refreshes, and upgrades.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In the prior environment, the composite organization’s legacy, siloed networking and security solutions:

    • Cost $13,000,000 per year.
    • Required one FTE to manage relationships with its multiple vendors.

  • With the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution, the composite reduces networking and security spend and the amount of labor needed to manage vendor tools by 20%.

  • The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE is $142,380.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:

  • An organization’s size and networking and security maturity, which can influence IT spend.

  • An organization’s use of Fortinet services and actual costs, including support and/or warranty costs.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.0 million.

1,082 hours

Vendor management labor saved with Fortinet’s converged networking and security

“I don’t have the luxury of having a firewall person and a wireless person and a network person. Having the same operating system across all the platforms helps us financially, but it also allows us to keep our footprint of staff low and able to manage this ourselves.”

Technology leader, education

Networking And Security Technology Convergence
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Annual spend on legacy, siloed networking and security solutions in the prior environment Composite $13,000,000 $13,000,000 $13,000,000
A2 Resources needed to maintain legacy, siloed networking and security solutions in the prior environment Composite 1 1 1
A3 Percentage reduction in networking and security spend with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge converged platform Interviews 20% 20% 20%
A4 Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp Interviews 60% 100% 100%
A5 Fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE Composite $142,380 $142,380 $142,380
At Networking and security technology convergence ((A1*A3)+(A2*A3*A5))*A4 $1,577,086 $2,628,476 $2,628,476
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Atr Networking and security technology convergence (risk-adjusted)   $1,419,377 $2,365,628 $2,365,628
Three-year total: $6,150,634 Three-year present value: $5,022,740
Improved Network Availability

Evidence and data. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge improved their organizations’ availability of core network services with significant impacts on revenue operations and employee productivity. They further discussed how Fortinet helped their organizations:

  • Reduce outages and downtime. Interviewees discussed how their organizations experienced fewer hours of downtime with Fortinet.

    • The technology services manager in the healthcare industry shared that the solution reduced downtime compared to their organization’s prior, manually configured environment, stating, “It will save us days [of disruption] if we have a hardware failure because the configurations are contained in [our Fortinet environment] and it’s just a matter of swapping out the hardware.”
    • The technology leader in the education industry shared that their organization’s converged and centralized network infrastructure with Fortinet improved its to maintain 5,000 switches across its distributed environment. By resegmenting its network with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge; however, the interviewee reported that the overall performance and resilience of core network services vastly improved, stating, “Since implementing this solution, our uptime is around 99.99%.”

  • Optimize network capacity. Interviewees discussed how their organizations not only improved uptime but also optimized for different traffic flows across their environments without sacrificing stability or security. The technology leader in the education industry shared that their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge allowed their organization to service all Wi-Fi users, including during peak traffic times. This reduced the amount of business disruption caused by Wi-Fi capacity limits with their former solution.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In the prior environment, the composite experienced 20 hours of downtime annually on average due to unplanned downtime and performance degradations. Without intervention, downtime would increase to 30 hours in Year 2 and 45 in Year 3.

  • The composite organization risks losing an average of $342,466 in revenue for every hour of network downtime.

  • The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

  • With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite decreases downtime hours by 80%, recouping 10 hours of unplanned downtime in Year 1, 24 hours of unplanned downtime in Year 2, and 36 hours of unplanned downtime in Year 3.

  • The composite’s operating margin is 11%.

  • In the prior environment, unplanned downtime impacted 50% of the composite organization’s 10,000 end users.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for an end user is $40.

  • Each end-user employee recaptures 25% of time savings toward productive tasks.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:

  • An organization’s size, industry, and location, which may impact profitability, network performance, uptime, and other network availability factors prior to Fortinet.

  • The role and salary of each user.

  • The extent to which end users can recapture saved time toward productive work.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.2 million.

$2.6M

Increased profit from improved network availability with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

“[Fortinet Secure LAN Edge] has given us the ability to improve our network instead of just trying to keep it functional. It has given us more time to look for and find problems, for one, and also to be able to implement [new networking and] security strategies.”

Technology leader, education

Improved Network Availability
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Annual average hours of downtime or severe performance degradation in the prior environment Composite 20 30 45
B2 Reduced unplanned downtime and system performance attributable to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Interviews 80% 80% 80%
B3 Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp A4 60% 100% 100%
B4 Total avoided hours of unplanned downtime in the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment B1*B2*B3 10 24 36
B5 Average revenue at risk per hour of unplanned downtime Total revenue/hours in a year (8,760) $342,466 $342,466 $342,466
B6 Operating margin Composite 11% 11% 11%
B7 Subtotal: Increased profit from improved network availability B4*B5*B6 $376,713 $904,110 $1,356,165
B8 Total end users Composite 10,000 10,000 10,000
B9 Percentage of end users impacted by unplanned downtime in the prior environment Interviews 50% 50% 50%
B10 Fully burdened hourly rate for an end user Composite $40 $40 $40
B11 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 25% 25% 25%
B12 Subtotal: Increased end user productivity from improved network availability B4*B8*B9*B10*B11 $500,000 $1,200,000 $1,800,000
Bt Improved network availability B7+B12 $876,713 $2,104,110 $3,156,165
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Btr Improved network availability (risk-adjusted)   $745,206 $1,788,494 $2,682,740
Three-year total: $5,216,440 Three-year present value: $4,171,136
Networking Operational Efficiencies

Evidence and data. Interviewees discussed how their organizations’ networking teams were more productive and efficient due to the following features of the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution:

  • Centralized networking operations. Interviewees described how converging their network and security technology with Fortinet conferred operational efficiencies compared to their organizations’ prior environments.

    • The CIO in the retail industry noted that Fortinet’s straightforward tools and infrastructure helped their organization avoid engineering labor required for network design and segmentation strategies. They also noted that Fortinet allowed their organization to better manage across both its B2C and B2B functions: “We’re able to holistically manage our Fortinet [stack] across both [of our organization’s] environments from a central location with limited staff. If my Fortinet specialist here at [one division] gets sick, my Fortinet specialist at the [other] division can also manage [our Fortinet environment], so that is extremely valuable.”
    • The technology leader in the education industry said: “[With] everything in the same user interface and being able to manage all of the controllers, the access points, and the switches through one system with FortiManager allows us to shift some responsibilities down to a lower level of support. Not everything has to be handled by the one person that knows how to do it. It’s made it a lot easier for us to manage and not rely on one person all the time to be able to fix everything.”

  • Time-saving networking automations. Interviewees discussed their organizations’ prior networking environments, which were weighed down by highly manual processes for detecting devices and managing switches and firewalls. With Fortinet, their organizations were able to automate and make updates in batches, which led to faster processes for deployment and provisioning as well.

    • The IT security administrator in the manufacturing industry said: “With FortiSwitches, [network operations are] easily 25% more [efficient. Previously], when I had to make a change, we had to … log on to [each] switch [individually]. Now you just sign into the firewall and you make all the changes from there. You can bulk update by selecting multiple things and autoprovision. When you plug one [device] in, [Fortinet] detects it, and it sets it up for you. It makes it a lot easier.”
    • The technology leader in the education industry said that, prior to Fortinet, their organization dedicated days and weeks of scripting and updating switches after hours versus utilizing the FortiManager, which conferred significant time savings: “It would take a couple of weeks at least every six months to distribute patches, whereas with Fortinet it takes one to two evenings.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In the prior environment, the composite dedicated 12 FTEs to NetOps.

  • The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

  • With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite organization’s NetOps FTEs increase efficiency by 50%.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE is $142,380.

  • Each NetOps employee recaptures 80% of time savings toward productive tasks.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:

  • The amount of time spent configuring and enforcing policies, provisioning users and sites, and other relevant NetOps activities.

  • FTEs dedicated to NetOps, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.

  • The extent to which NetOps resources can recapture saved time toward productive work.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.3 million.

50%

Increase in networking FTE efficiency

“The biggest surprise was how much network management changed by adding those FortiSwitches, especially for our network person. [He told me]: ‘Wow, this just made my life a lot easier.’”

IT security administrator, manufacturing

Networking Operational Efficiencies
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Total FTEs dedicated to NetOps Composite 12 12 12
C2 Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp A4 60% 100% 100%
C3 Percentage increase in efficiency with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Interviews 50% 50% 50%
C4 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 80% 80% 80%
C5 Fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE Composite $142,380 $142,380 $142,380
Ct Networking operational efficiencies C1*C2*C3*C4*C5 $410,054 $683,424 $683,424
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Ctr Networking operational efficiencies (risk-adjusted)   $369,049 $615,082 $615,082
Three-year total: $1,599,212 Three-year present value: $1,305,951
Network Security Efficiencies

Evidence and data. The interviewees noted that Fortinet Secure LAN Edge’s converged networking and security tools contributed to an array of impacts on their organizations’ security and risk posture. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet helped strengthen their organizations’ security-driven wired and wireless Zero Trust strategy with value drivers including:

  • Lower incident rates. Interviewees reported a more resilient network perimeter with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, allowing fewer incidents through than their prior environments.

  • Reduced time spent on investigations. In addition to having fewer incidents requiring a response, interviewees also reported that converging networking and security infrastructure with Fortinet reduced false positives and greatly improved visibility for incident responders, thus reducing the amount of time they spent investigating issues.

    • The CIO in the retail industry noted Fortinet’s centralized security and networking tools saved 25% to 30% of the time that their organization’s two security analysts would have to dedicate to combing through disparate tools.
    • The IT security administrator in the manufacturing industry said that, with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, their organization was able to reduce the time it took to investigate and resolve network security incidents: “[With our prior] system, I was probably spending 2 to 3 hours a day cleaning up messes on PCs. [With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, that] might be an hour or two a week now.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In the prior environment, the composite dedicated four FTEs to network security.

  • The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

  • With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, network security FTEs experience a 75% reduction in incident response time with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a network security FTE is $142,380.

  • Each network security employee recaptures 80% of time savings toward productive tasks.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:

  • An organization’s size, industry, location, and security maturity, which may influence security and risk metrics.

  • The frequency of security incidents involving persistent threat actors and remediation efforts in the prior environment.

  • FTEs dedicated to network security, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.

  • The extent to which network security resources can recapture saved time toward productive work.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $653,000.

75%

Percentage reduction in network security response time with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

“Fortinet is … definitely a key player in not only how we’re securing the organization both from a network standpoint but also from our firewalls and management of those over time. They’re truly part of our Zero Trust platform that we’re putting in place.”

Technology leader, education

Network Security Efficiencies
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Total FTEs dedicated to network security Composite 4 4 4
D2 Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp A4 60% 100% 100%
D3 Percentage reduction in network security effort with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Interviews 75% 75% 75%
D4 Productivity recapture Forrester methodology 80% 80% 80%
D5 Fully burdened annual salary for a network security FTE Composite $142,380 $142,380 $142,380
Dt Network security efficiencies D1*D2*D3*D4*D5 $205,027 $341,712 $341,712
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Dtr Network security efficiencies (risk-adjusted)   $184,524 $307,541 $307,541
Three-year total: $799,606 Three-year present value: $652,975
Reduced Cost Of A Material Breach

Evidence and data. Interviewees indicated that Fortinet Secure LAN Edge helped improve their organizations’ security posture by reducing the threat of an external attack on their organizations’ networks. In particular, they discussed how Fortinet helped with:

  • Cyber risk reduction. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge helped mitigate external threats with built-in Zero Trust, network access control, and microsegmentation.

    • The IT security administrator in the manufacturing industry said, “[With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge],I would say we’re at least 60% stronger in our security, if not higher.”
    • The technology leader in the education industry said: “We have been able to increase security and reliability on our network by being able to segment things out [with Fortinet]. In that process, we’ve also been able to find devices and things that we didn’t know were on our network or [other] possible problems. We’ve been able to restrict access to our more important things based on device [information].”

      The technology leader in the education industry also shared how centralizing and improving security operations with Fortinet allowed their organization to prevent external threats from gaining a foothold into its network: “The Fortinet firewalls and our distributed wireless controllers are essentially a firewall for the switch management. The licensing that we have on our firewalls covers some main security risks [around] breaches. I think Fortinet is doing a great job with that and so that’s what we utilize it for.”
    • The CIO in the retail industry told Forrester that their organization was able to improve its network security posture thanks to its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge investment: “Consolidating allows me to get information for the entire environment quickly. Obviously, we think [Fortinet] provides the best security of our perimeter.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • According to Forrester Research, the composite organization has:

    • A 68% likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches per year.3
    • A mean cumulative cost of breaches totaling $3,265,000.4
    • A 70% chance of breaches originating from external attacks.5

  • The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

  • The composite organization’s annual risk exposure addressable with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge is $932,484 in Year 1 and $1,554,140 in Years 2 and 3.

  • With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite organization reduces the risk of breaches from external attacks by 60%.

  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE is $142,380.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:

  • An organization’s size, industry, location, and security maturity, which may influence security and risk metrics and breach impacts.

  • The frequency of security incidents involving persistent threat actors and remediation efforts in the prior environment.

  • FTEs dedicated to network security, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million.

60%

Reduced risk of breaches from external attacks with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge

“We’re able to pull in the switches in our data center and have them managed by the firewall now. So we will be able to have better control and security on those because we’ll be able to see them where we can see everything else, instead of having more standalone switches out there.”

Technology leader, education

Reduced Cost Of A Material Breach
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches per year Forrester research 68% 68% 68%
E2 Mean cumulative cost of breaches Forrester research $3,265,000 $3,265,000 $3,265,000
E3 Percentage of breaches originating from external attacks Forrester research 70% 70% 70%
E4 Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp A4 60% 100% 100%
E5 Annual risk exposure addressable with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge E1*E2*E3*E4 $932,484 $1,554,140 $1,554,140
E6 Reduced risk of breaches from external attacks with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Interviews 60% 60% 60%
Et Reduced cost of a material breach E5*E6 $559,490 $932,484 $932,484
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Etr Reduced cost of a material breach (risk-adjusted)   $447,592 $745,987 $745,987
Three-year total: $1,939,566 Three-year present value: $1,583,891
Improved Profit And Agility

Evidence and data. As their organizations optimized their technology management and converged their networking and security tools on one platform with Fortinet, the interviewees reported higher levels of agility, leading to faster time to market, increased market share, and improved profit.

  • The CIO in the retail industry reported that their organization was able to decrease the time it took to provision new stores by up to six weeks compared to the prior environment. This improved time to market also allowed it to open more stores in a shorter period of time compared to before Fortinet. They said: “Fortinet is an ‘intrinsic enablement tool’ that is installed whenever we are discussing a new physical or virtual environment (e.g., store, plant, etc.). … We’ve been very happy with having a core set of equipment that we can bring into a new environment.

  • The technology leader in the education industry said that their organization was able to decrease the time needed to set up new sites. Before Fortinet, it could take weeks to deploy a new site; with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, they were able to decrease the deployment time to a maximum of two days. Furthermore, the interviewee noted: “It was a lot simpler as far as the actual setup at the school, too. We didn’t have to have somebody onsite that knew how to configure every switch and all of that. … In that scenario, I don’t need specialists in the field; I just need technicians in the field, and then I need the engineers here managing it.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • In the prior environment, the composite organization:

    • Earned an average of $57,692 in revenue per branch per week.
    • Opened an average of five new branches per year.
    • Took 12 weeks to open a new branch.

  • With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite reduced the time it takes to open a branch by 50%, down to six weeks.

  • The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

  • The composite’s operating margin is 11%.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:

  • The number of branches opened in the prior environment and the length of time required to provision new branches.

  • An organization’s revenue, operating margin, and the portion of revenue earned from branches.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $344,000.

50%

Faster time to market

“We were able to open 17 stores in three months. In the history of this company, which is almost 100 years, they’ve never been able to do that nor have they ever attempted it. [Before Fortinet, our company] would open [two to] six stores [per year. Furthermore], if we didn’t move in to take over those 17 stores, our competitors would have seized that market share, possibly forever. Then we would be trying to fight to get back into certain new markets that we had right in front of us available for the taking.”

CIO, retail

Improved Profit And Agility
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Total revenue per branch per week Composite $57,692 $57,692 $57,692
F2 New branches opened per year Composite 5 5 5
F3 Weeks to open a branch in the prior environment Composite 12 12 12
F4 Weeks to open a branch with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Interviews 6 6 6
F5 Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp A4 60% 100% 100%
F6 Operating margin B6 11% 11% 11%
Ft Improved profit and agility F1*F2*(F3-F4)*F5*F6 $114,231 $190,385 $190,385
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Ftr Improved profit and agility (risk-adjusted)   $97,096 $161,827 $161,827
Three-year total: $420,751 Three-year present value: $343,594
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • IT help desk optimization. Interviewees noted how their Fortinet environments experience lower support volumes and also decreased the time it took to resolve user issues. This led to productivity improvements for support staff and intervening networking and security staff working to resolve issues and for general business users submitting tickets. Interviewees noted how Fortinet offered improved visibility and context in the triage phase.

    The technology leader in the education industry said: “With our call center, [IT support staff] are able to view all the schools or look and see what’s up and what’s down. … A lot of times, we’d have to have somebody actually go out and verify things. [Now], they’re able to resolve a lot of issues very quickly.”

  • Cyber insurance retention. The IT security administrator in the manufacturing industry said that their organization was able to retain cyber insurance and reduce cyber insurance premiums with their Fortinet configuration.

  • A Fortinet roadmap, technology partnerships, and channel support and partnership. Interviewees shared how their close partnerships with Fortinet and its evolving and responsive roadmap were key value drivers for their organizations’ Fortinet investments.

    The CIO in the retail industry noted: “I truly appreciate the partnership that I have with Fortinet. … The customer service aspect of Fortinet from my perspective is so great compared to my experience with the others that it sells itself to me. … They’re very proactive in helping us understand what you have, what you need to start thinking about replacing, etc. So, that is a distinguishing aspect beyond just the capabilities and tools.”

“[Fortinet] has cut down on the time to resolve issues with [everything in] one pane of glass where [we] can look and see the APs, switches, and all that together.

Technology leader, education

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Fortinet Secure LAN Edge and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Additional business use cases. Interviewees noted that their organizations were able to develop new engagement models with their customers by leveraging new capabilities with their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment. This included building customer-facing applications and installing customer Wi-Fi and mobile services at branches.

    The CIO in the retail industry shared that their organization was able to develop new ways of serving their customers and enhancing operations with their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environments. They reported that their organization’s Fortinet investment allowed it to explore two new initiatives to improve customer experience: “One was to provide wireless for tablets devices and mobile devices that we have. The second was for the concept of a mobile point-of-sale station, which [is] what we would call a ‘line buster’ in retail speak. We’re going to introduce technology at different times and one of those might be to allow mobile devices to scan items for accounting, inventory, etc.”

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Gtr Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs $0 $736,659 $1,136,256 $1,612,875 $3,485,790 $2,820,521
Htr Deployment costs $72,864 $97,152 $97,152 $0 $267,168 $241,475
Itr Management costs $0 $37,950 $71,157 $71,157 $180,264 $146,768
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $72,864 $871,761 $1,304,565 $1,684,032 $3,933,222 $3,208,764
Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees’ organizations had various configurations of FortiSwitches, FortiAPs and FortiGates Fortinet. These organizations also had a variety of additional Fortinet products and services.

Pricing may vary. Contact Fortinet for additional details.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the composite organization deploys FortiSwitches, FortiGates, and FortiAP across its entire environment. These solutions are fully deployed by the end of Year 2. Fortinet costs also include FortiManager, warranty, and support costs.

Risks. An organization’s use of Fortinet services and actual costs based on warranty, support, and other costs may impact this cost.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.8 million.

Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs Composite $0 $669,690 $1,032,960 $1,466,250
Gt Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs G1 $0 $669,690 $1,032,960 $1,466,250
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Gtr Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $736,659 $1,136,256 $1,612,875
Three-year total: $3,485,790 Three-year present value: $2,820,521
Deployment Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees described how their organizations deployed their respective Fortinet configurations in phases. Multiple interviewees noted their organizations began with FortiGate firewall deployment and expanded their LAN Edge environments to include FortiSwitches, FortiAPs, and other capabilities, including telephony and wireless, and products like FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, FortiEDR, and others.

These phased deployments tended to take one to four weeks per year of fully dedicated effort to install, test, and roll out. In addition to internal effort, some interviewees also discussed working with Fortinet’s professional services and a third-party system integrator. Interviewees noted minimal training due to the technology’s ease of use and integrated interface.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization dedicates four technology FTEs to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge deployment.

  • In the six-week initial deployment phase, each FTE spends 240 hours on deployment, increasing to 320 hours of deployment labor per FTE in Years 1 and 2.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE is $69.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this cost:

  • Network and security implementation requirements and complexity.

  • The internal resources involved in the deployment, how much time each resource dedicates, and the fully burdened salary of each resource.

  • Training requirements for IT resources and users.

  • Change management efforts.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $242,000.

“We’ve had all [of our Fortinet] solutions set up and going within three days max. We have the solutions fully stood up and going in one or two weeks a year of phased deployments.”

CIO, retail

Deployment Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
H1 Total FTEs involved in deployment Interviews 4 4 4 0
H2 Average hours of deployment effort per FTE Interviews 240 320 320 0
H3 Fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE Composite $69 $69 $69 $69
Ht Deployment costs H1*H2*H3 $66,240 $88,320 $88,320 $0
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Htr Deployment costs (risk-adjusted)   $72,864 $97,152 $97,152 $0
Three-year total: $267,168 Three-year present value: $241,475
Management Costs

Evidence and data. Interviewees reported low ongoing administrative costs to manage their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environments. Not only did interviewees feel the operational resources were lower on a day-to-day basis, but they also highlighted the better quality of the products and close strategic partnership as opposed to other vendors that were more transactional with little investment or engagement to help with operational costs or efficiencies.

  • The CIO in the retail industry told Forrester: “The Fortinet products are low maintenance. I don’t recall a time when we had to replace faulty equipment. Fortinet offers patches that we prioritize depending on the urgency of the patch.”

  • The IT security administrator in the manufacturing industry said that it took 4 or 5 hours per week to manage their organization’s Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment, which was much lower than its prior environment.

  • The technology leader in the education industry shared that their organization’s team of three had monthly, hour-long check-ins with Fortinet to learn about and integrate new Fortinet products and troubleshoot as needed.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite organization dedicates two technology FTEs to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge management in Year 1. As the platform expands, the composite dedicates 2.5 technology FTEs to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge management in Years 2 and 3.

  • In Year 1, FTEs dedicate 250 hours each to maintaining Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, increasing to 375 hours each in Years 2 and 3.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE is $69.

Risks. The following potential risks may impact this cost:

  • Ongoing management requirements.

  • FTEs dedicated to ongoing management, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $147,000.

“We are able to manage a larger footprint with less staff because of the consolidated and central tools included with Fortinet.”

CIO, retail

Management Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
I1 Resources dedicated to maintaining Fortinet Secure LAN Edge Interviews 0 2.0 2.5 2.5
I2 Hours dedicated to maintaining Fortinet Secure LAN Edge per FTE Interviews 0 250 375 375
I3 Fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE Composite $69 $69 $69 $69
It Management costs I1*I2*I3 $0 $34,500 $64,688 $64,688
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Itr Management costs (risk-adjusted)   $0 $37,950 $71,157 $71,157
Three-year total: $180,264 Three-year present value: $146,768

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($72,864) ($871,761) ($1,304,565) ($1,684,032) ($3,933,222) ($3,208,764)
Total benefits $0 $3,262,845 $5,984,559 $6,878,806 $16,126,209 $13,080,287
Net benefits ($72,864) $2,391,084 $4,679,994 $5,194,774 $12,192,987 $9,871,523
ROI           308%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Fortinet Secure LAN Edge can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Fortinet stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.

Interviews

Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Fortinet Secure LAN Edge to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present Value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net Present Value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return On Investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount Rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback Period

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

2 FortiSwitch FS-448E-FPOE, FortiGate FG-61, FortiAP FAP-321.

3 Regression analysis of the likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches, using the frequency that organizations experienced breaches in the past 12 months as reported by security decision-makers. The composite organization’s revenue is used as the input to the regression formula. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “How many times do you estimate that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months?” Base: 2,769 global security decision-makers.

4 Regression analysis of the reported total cumulative costs of all breaches experienced by security decision-makers’ organizations in the past 12 months. The composite organization’s revenue is used as the input to the regression formula. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “Using your best estimate, what was the total cumulative cost of all breaches experienced by your organization in the past 12 months?” Base: 1,660 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months.

5 Percent of breaches by primary attack vector for breaches, as reported by security decision-makers whose organizations experienced at least one breach in the last 12 months. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “Of the times that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months, please indicate how many of each fall into the categories below.” Base: 1542 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Fortinet and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Fortinet or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Fortinet and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Fortinet make no warranties of any kind.

Fortinet reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Fortinet provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Courtenay O’Connor

Published

Alyssa Dolan