Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Fortinet Secure LAN Edge
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Fortinet, JUNE 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Fortinet, JUNE 2025
Businesses leverage cloud, IoT, AI, and other technologies to drive new revenue streams, enhance customer experiences, and reduce operating costs. These technologies force organizations to adopt new solutions, services, methodologies, and business strategies to reap the benefits of these technological advances. The largest transformation that extends across and beyond the business is embedding security directly into a network DNA, which means integrating security measures as an inherent part of the network’s architecture and operations rather than adding them as separate, bolted-on components. Separate, discrete systems introduce inefficiencies and risk as mistakes increase with repetitive tasks. Merging security and networking infrastructure and operations secures business operations, optimizes IT operations, reduces risk, and improves business value.
The Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution converges network and security management, monitoring, and AI into a single secure networking console. Merging security and networking helps streamline operations, improve observability, and enable automation. The Fortinet Secure LAN Edge provides secure networking across wired and wireless that integrates with Fortinet and third-party enterprise and security architecture for strong connectivity and simplified management.
Fortinet commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Fortinet Secure LAN Edge on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is a global company generating $3 billion annually from business-to-business and business-to-consumer divisions
Interviewees said that prior to using Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, their organizations struggled to allocate enough resources to maintain multiple, hard-to-use, and disparate networking products that did not integrate with their security. As a result, the interviewees’ organizations were vulnerable to risks, outages, and scaling constraints as data and applications moved from data centers across the business to the edge and partners. IoT devices, now outnumbering traditional technology devices like laptops and printers, injected new risks. Isolated and disconnected security appliances, mostly residing in the data center, couldn’t secure workloads, devices, users, and data in the boundaryless infrastructure.
After investing in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the interviewees described how Fortinet’s FortiManager, FortiGate, FortiAP, and FortiSwitch converged security and networking into a single system. Implementing Fortinet Secure LAN Edge helped their organizations to decrease the level of internal labor and expertise needed for managing multiple legacy point products. The consolidated environment improved network availability and visibility, reduced security risk, and improved the interviewees’ organizations’ ability to nimbly scale to meet business objectives. By breaking down the security and network silos, it facilitated a consistent set of policies spanning user/device identity and context. Fortinet Secure LAN Edge also created a consistent user experience by applying these policies to users and devices wherever they reside and connecting to any resource, both cloud-based and on-premises.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Saved networking and security technology costs by 20%. By converging its legacy, siloed networking and security solutions with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite organization optimizes upgrade and refresh cycles. It deploys fewer point solutions and requires less specialization and expertise to maintain than prior solutions needed. With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite’s networking and security technology convergence is worth $5.0 million.
Recouped 70 hours of network downtime for improved revenue retention. With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, security and networking professionals at the composite have less components to configure, data to enter, and systems to integrate. The potential failure points and security holes decrease as does the amount of work required of the organization with simplification. This reduces unplanned downtime by 80%, facilitating an increase in both revenue retention as the composite stays online at a higher rate. The value of Fortinet’s improved network availability for the composite is $4.2 million.
Increased efficiency for network operations (NetOps) teams by 50%. In the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment, the composite organization increases NetOps FTEs efficiency by consolidating the management of wired, wireless, and security into one interface. Provisioning and making changes in one location creates a single pane of visibility, which enables operators to solve problems quicker instead of filtering through data from multiple systems, each with their structure and interfaces. For the composite organization, the value of eliminating redundant tasks across disparate and unique systems amounts to $1.3 million.
Increased network security response time by 75%. With improved visibility across security and networking components, the composite’s security team dedicates less time to investigating and resolving network-related risks since technology professionals are looking at the same data. The converged platform means that incident responders have fewer data sources to check with lower incident rates and false positives and faster resolution times for true events. The value of this improved network security response time for the composite is $653,000.
Reduced risk of breaches from external attacks by 60%. The Fortinet Secure LAN Edge protects the composite organization’s perimeter at connection points into the network, whether it is a wireless guest user or IoT device connecting. This heightened visibility also improves the composite’s security posture. Issues are caught at the edge of the network before damage can be done inside the technology infrastructure or business operations. This helps the composite organization reduce the cost of a potential material breach by $1.6 million.
Increased time to market by 50% for improved revenue and agility. By leveraging the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution to open new, revenue-generating branches, the composite cuts the time to open a branch in half. In doing so, it gains entry into new markets, grows market share, and improves the in-branch customer experience, resulting in revenue more quickly than if the composite used its legacy networking and security solutions. The value of this faster time to market is $344,000 for the composite organization.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
IT help desk optimization.
Cyber insurance retention.
A Fortinet roadmap, technology partnerships, and channel support.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Fortinet Secure LAN Edge infrastructure costs. The composite organization fully deploys FortiManager, FortiSwitches, FortiGates, and FortiAPs across its entire environment, deploying by the end of Year 2. Fortinet costs also include annual device and software support costs totaling $2.8 million.
Deployment expenses. The composite organization partially dedicates four technology resources to a Fortinet deployment. Over three years of phased implementation, the composite dedicates approximately 3,500 hours of internal FTE labor to implementation for a total of $241,000 in deployment costs.
Management costs. The composite organization partially dedicates up to 2.5 resources to managing Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. Over three years, this adds up to approximately 2,400 hours of management for a total of $147,000 in management costs.
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $13.1 million over three years versus costs of $3.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $9.9 million and an ROI of 308%.
Total recouped unplanned downtime reattributed to profitable and productive use in the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback period
| Role | Industry | Region | FTEs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology services manager | Healthcare | North America | 29,000 |
| IT security administrator | Manufacturing | Global, North America headquarters | 500 |
| CIO | Retail | North America | 1,700 |
| Technology leader | Education | North America | 4,000 |
Prior to their investments in Fortinet, interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Siloed and outdated networking and security technologies. Interviewees described how their organizations had separate, siloed networking and security teams and technologies. Access points and switches were often managed through different consoles that were not in sync with each other, requiring longer refresh and upgrade cycles that relied on costly labor and often risked widespread business disruption. By having discrete, disjointed components, the interviewees’ organizations couldn’t utilize automation capabilities since the hardware or software didn’t work together.
The technology services manager in the healthcare industry shared: “If we just stayed with the [prior vendor], we would have to [refresh] about 1,800 switches. With the network access control [and other needed capabilities], it was probably going to run $17 million.”
Poor performance and availability of core network services. Interviewees discussed how their prior vendors for core technology, such as networking and Wi-Fi, had high levels of downtime from outages as well as slow and insufficient bandwidth. These issues contributed to further cascading malfunctions and caused frequent business disruption and productivity losses.
The technology leader in the education industry said that their organization experienced downtime from network outages and rigid constraints, leading to performance degradation: “Prior [to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge], we had a good bit of downtime with wireless. We were having scalability issues where we were actually reaching caps for wireless. [Up] to 10,000 users were able to connect at a given time, [but] we need closer to 28,000, so we were desperate to get off the former solution. When we would reach those caps, we would have things that would restart or lose connection, which would then cause problems for our actual network switches, and then they would lose connection, too. We would not just have Wi-Fi down but have an entire location go down, so it [impacted] uptime for our entire network.”
Labor inefficiencies and talent shortages for networking teams. Interviewees noted that their teams needed to dedicate entire positions to maintaining individual technologies, such as voice over IP (VoIP) and telephony, just for basic maintenance and operations. These resources were frequently required to maintain certifications or high levels of expertise in scripting languages and specific technologies, and interviewees noted that their teams had limited cross training, which led to operational bottlenecks and business disruption.
The technology leader in the education industry said: “Previously, we did a lot of scripting to manage our switches, and it limited who was able to actually work on them … because you had to have at least some basic knowledge of the scripting, [making it difficult] to manage for everybody [because] we’re putting firewalls at every school.”
Heightened risks and costly impacts of a network-related material breach. Most of the interviewees’ organizations were in industries that possessed highly sensitive personal information and needed to protect it. These organizations were therefore subject to heightened levels of social engineering, fraud, and cyberattacks. At the same time, the interviewees noted that their security and networking teams lacked the visibility across their product areas needed to effectively secure their network.
Limited engagement models. Interviewees discussed how their organizations’ legacy, siloed technology environments required lengthy, manual processes for provisioning and deploying new branches and sites. This hampered innovation and limited their abilities to engage customers and stakeholder groups and securely grow to meet business objectives.
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that embedded Zero Trust into their networks through a single system. The interviewees discussed how their growing organizations sought to replace aged-out equipment with a solution that would be compatible with their evolving hybrid cloud estates and the continual digital transformation that connected more IoT devices, partners, and customers into the network.
Interviewees reported that their organizations invested in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge because it offered an elegant, converged platform upon which their organizations could offer their end users strong connectivity and secure their organizations’ growth. In addition, the shift from per-hardware management to software-driven enabled higher levels of automation. They described that the converged security and network management software enabled their organizations to gain a high level of security that was embedded into the network infrastructure rather than bolted on, while deploying cost-effective and highly automated networking fabric.
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The global organization has both business-to-business and business-to-consumer divisions and is supported by 10,0000 FTEs. It generates $3 billion annually, with 15% of revenue derived from approximately 150 branches and sites. It spends $13 million on networking and security, with 12 FTEs in networking operations and four FTEs in security operations.
Deployment characteristics. Over the three-year period, the composite deploys FortiAP, FortiSwitch, and FortiGate firewalls.2 It also invests in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer. The composite deploys 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1, with full deployment completed by the end of Year 2.
$3 billion in annual revenue
10,000 employees
150 sites
11% operating margin
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Networking and security technology convergence | $1,419,377 | $2,365,628 | $2,365,628 | $6,150,634 | $5,022,740 |
| Btr | Improved network availability | $745,206 | $1,788,494 | $2,682,740 | $5,216,440 | $4,171,136 |
| Ctr | Networking operational efficiencies | $369,049 | $615,082 | $615,082 | $1,599,212 | $1,305,951 |
| Dtr | Network security efficiencies | $184,524 | $307,541 | $307,541 | $799,606 | $652,975 |
| Etr | Reduced cost of a material breach | $447,592 | $745,987 | $745,987 | $1,939,566 | $1,583,891 |
| Ftr | Improved profit and agility | $97,096 | $161,827 | $161,827 | $420,751 | $343,594 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $3,262,845 | $5,984,559 | $6,878,806 | $16,126,209 | $13,080,287 |
Evidence and data. In shifting to a Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment, interviewees reported that their organizations were able to converge their networking and security stacks. Whereas they previously needed highly specialized resources to manage high-maintenance on-prem and cloud-based networking environments, interviewees pointed to the streamlined operations and optimized technology stack with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. Interviewees detailed networking and security technology convergence benefits including:
Cost and labor savings. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge offered competitive cost savings while augmenting functionality and security. They also highlighted how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge lowered the labor and skilled expertise required to manage multiple vendors and freed up skilled headcount for higher-value activities.
Furthermore, the technology services manager in the healthcare industry shared that their organization was able to reallocate network administrators to higher-value activities. Instead of doing repetitive data entry work, their network administrators shifted towards solving strategic problems.
Optimized upgrade and refresh cycles. Interviewees highlighted how their organizations needed to support fewer upgrades and refreshes and that those cycles were more stable with less disruption. Taken together, interviewees noted how this made it easier to maintain the latest and most secure versions of their software:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite organization’s legacy, siloed networking and security solutions:
With the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution, the composite reduces networking and security spend and the amount of labor needed to manage vendor tools by 20%.
The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
The average fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE is $142,380.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s size and networking and security maturity, which can influence IT spend.
An organization’s use of Fortinet services and actual costs, including support and/or warranty costs.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.0 million.
Vendor management labor saved with Fortinet’s converged networking and security
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Annual spend on legacy, siloed networking and security solutions in the prior environment | Composite | $13,000,000 | $13,000,000 | $13,000,000 | |
| A2 | Resources needed to maintain legacy, siloed networking and security solutions in the prior environment | Composite | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| A3 | Percentage reduction in networking and security spend with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge converged platform | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| A4 | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp | Interviews | 60% | 100% | 100% | |
| A5 | Fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE | Composite | $142,380 | $142,380 | $142,380 | |
| At | Networking and security technology convergence | ((A1*A3)+(A2*A3*A5))*A4 | $1,577,086 | $2,628,476 | $2,628,476 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Atr | Networking and security technology convergence (risk-adjusted) | $1,419,377 | $2,365,628 | $2,365,628 | ||
| Three-year total: $6,150,634 | Three-year present value: $5,022,740 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge improved their organizations’ availability of core network services with significant impacts on revenue operations and employee productivity. They further discussed how Fortinet helped their organizations:
Reduce outages and downtime. Interviewees discussed how their organizations experienced fewer hours of downtime with Fortinet.
Optimize network capacity. Interviewees discussed how their organizations not only improved uptime but also optimized for different traffic flows across their environments without sacrificing stability or security. The technology leader in the education industry shared that their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge allowed their organization to service all Wi-Fi users, including during peak traffic times. This reduced the amount of business disruption caused by Wi-Fi capacity limits with their former solution.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite experienced 20 hours of downtime annually on average due to unplanned downtime and performance degradations. Without intervention, downtime would increase to 30 hours in Year 2 and 45 in Year 3.
The composite organization risks losing an average of $342,466 in revenue for every hour of network downtime.
The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite decreases downtime hours by 80%, recouping 10 hours of unplanned downtime in Year 1, 24 hours of unplanned downtime in Year 2, and 36 hours of unplanned downtime in Year 3.
The composite’s operating margin is 11%.
In the prior environment, unplanned downtime impacted 50% of the composite organization’s 10,000 end users.
The fully burdened hourly rate for an end user is $40.
Each end-user employee recaptures 25% of time savings toward productive tasks.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s size, industry, and location, which may impact profitability, network performance, uptime, and other network availability factors prior to Fortinet.
The role and salary of each user.
The extent to which end users can recapture saved time toward productive work.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.2 million.
Increased profit from improved network availability with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Annual average hours of downtime or severe performance degradation in the prior environment | Composite | 20 | 30 | 45 | |
| B2 | Reduced unplanned downtime and system performance attributable to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge | Interviews | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| B3 | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp | A4 | 60% | 100% | 100% | |
| B4 | Total avoided hours of unplanned downtime in the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment | B1*B2*B3 | 10 | 24 | 36 | |
| B5 | Average revenue at risk per hour of unplanned downtime | Total revenue/hours in a year (8,760) | $342,466 | $342,466 | $342,466 | |
| B6 | Operating margin | Composite | 11% | 11% | 11% | |
| B7 | Subtotal: Increased profit from improved network availability | B4*B5*B6 | $376,713 | $904,110 | $1,356,165 | |
| B8 | Total end users | Composite | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| B9 | Percentage of end users impacted by unplanned downtime in the prior environment | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| B10 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an end user | Composite | $40 | $40 | $40 | |
| B11 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| B12 | Subtotal: Increased end user productivity from improved network availability | B4*B8*B9*B10*B11 | $500,000 | $1,200,000 | $1,800,000 | |
| Bt | Improved network availability | B7+B12 | $876,713 | $2,104,110 | $3,156,165 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Btr | Improved network availability (risk-adjusted) | $745,206 | $1,788,494 | $2,682,740 | ||
| Three-year total: $5,216,440 | Three-year present value: $4,171,136 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees discussed how their organizations’ networking teams were more productive and efficient due to the following features of the Fortinet Secure LAN Edge solution:
Centralized networking operations. Interviewees described how converging their network and security technology with Fortinet conferred operational efficiencies compared to their organizations’ prior environments.
Time-saving networking automations. Interviewees discussed their organizations’ prior networking environments, which were weighed down by highly manual processes for detecting devices and managing switches and firewalls. With Fortinet, their organizations were able to automate and make updates in batches, which led to faster processes for deployment and provisioning as well.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite dedicated 12 FTEs to NetOps.
The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite organization’s NetOps FTEs increase efficiency by 50%.
The average fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE is $142,380.
Each NetOps employee recaptures 80% of time savings toward productive tasks.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:
The amount of time spent configuring and enforcing policies, provisioning users and sites, and other relevant NetOps activities.
FTEs dedicated to NetOps, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.
The extent to which NetOps resources can recapture saved time toward productive work.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.3 million.
Increase in networking FTE efficiency
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Total FTEs dedicated to NetOps | Composite | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
| C2 | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp | A4 | 60% | 100% | 100% | |
| C3 | Percentage increase in efficiency with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| C4 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| C5 | Fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE | Composite | $142,380 | $142,380 | $142,380 | |
| Ct | Networking operational efficiencies | C1*C2*C3*C4*C5 | $410,054 | $683,424 | $683,424 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Networking operational efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $369,049 | $615,082 | $615,082 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,599,212 | Three-year present value: $1,305,951 | |||||
Evidence and data. The interviewees noted that Fortinet Secure LAN Edge’s converged networking and security tools contributed to an array of impacts on their organizations’ security and risk posture. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet helped strengthen their organizations’ security-driven wired and wireless Zero Trust strategy with value drivers including:
Lower incident rates. Interviewees reported a more resilient network perimeter with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, allowing fewer incidents through than their prior environments.
Reduced time spent on investigations. In addition to having fewer incidents requiring a response, interviewees also reported that converging networking and security infrastructure with Fortinet reduced false positives and greatly improved visibility for incident responders, thus reducing the amount of time they spent investigating issues.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite dedicated four FTEs to network security.
The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, network security FTEs experience a 75% reduction in incident response time with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
The average fully burdened annual salary for a network security FTE is $142,380.
Each network security employee recaptures 80% of time savings toward productive tasks.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s size, industry, location, and security maturity, which may influence security and risk metrics.
The frequency of security incidents involving persistent threat actors and remediation efforts in the prior environment.
FTEs dedicated to network security, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.
The extent to which network security resources can recapture saved time toward productive work.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $653,000.
Percentage reduction in network security response time with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Total FTEs dedicated to network security | Composite | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| D2 | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp | A4 | 60% | 100% | 100% | |
| D3 | Percentage reduction in network security effort with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge | Interviews | 75% | 75% | 75% | |
| D4 | Productivity recapture | Forrester methodology | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| D5 | Fully burdened annual salary for a network security FTE | Composite | $142,380 | $142,380 | $142,380 | |
| Dt | Network security efficiencies | D1*D2*D3*D4*D5 | $205,027 | $341,712 | $341,712 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | Network security efficiencies (risk-adjusted) | $184,524 | $307,541 | $307,541 | ||
| Three-year total: $799,606 | Three-year present value: $652,975 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees indicated that Fortinet Secure LAN Edge helped improve their organizations’ security posture by reducing the threat of an external attack on their organizations’ networks. In particular, they discussed how Fortinet helped with:
Cyber risk reduction. Interviewees discussed how Fortinet Secure LAN Edge helped mitigate external threats with built-in Zero Trust, network access control, and microsegmentation.
The technology leader in the education industry also shared how centralizing and improving security operations with Fortinet allowed their organization to prevent external threats from gaining a foothold into its network: “The Fortinet firewalls and our distributed wireless controllers are essentially a firewall for the switch management. The licensing that we have on our firewalls covers some main security risks [around] breaches. I think Fortinet is doing a great job with that and so that’s what we utilize it for.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
According to Forrester Research, the composite organization has:
The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
The composite organization’s annual risk exposure addressable with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge is $932,484 in Year 1 and $1,554,140 in Years 2 and 3.
With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite organization reduces the risk of breaches from external attacks by 60%.
The average fully burdened annual salary for a technology FTE is $142,380.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:
An organization’s size, industry, location, and security maturity, which may influence security and risk metrics and breach impacts.
The frequency of security incidents involving persistent threat actors and remediation efforts in the prior environment.
FTEs dedicated to network security, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.6 million.
Reduced risk of breaches from external attacks with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches per year | Forrester research | 68% | 68% | 68% | |
| E2 | Mean cumulative cost of breaches | Forrester research | $3,265,000 | $3,265,000 | $3,265,000 | |
| E3 | Percentage of breaches originating from external attacks | Forrester research | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| E4 | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp | A4 | 60% | 100% | 100% | |
| E5 | Annual risk exposure addressable with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge | E1*E2*E3*E4 | $932,484 | $1,554,140 | $1,554,140 | |
| E6 | Reduced risk of breaches from external attacks with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge | Interviews | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| Et | Reduced cost of a material breach | E5*E6 | $559,490 | $932,484 | $932,484 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Etr | Reduced cost of a material breach (risk-adjusted) | $447,592 | $745,987 | $745,987 | ||
| Three-year total: $1,939,566 | Three-year present value: $1,583,891 | |||||
Evidence and data. As their organizations optimized their technology management and converged their networking and security tools on one platform with Fortinet, the interviewees reported higher levels of agility, leading to faster time to market, increased market share, and improved profit.
The CIO in the retail industry reported that their organization was able to decrease the time it took to provision new stores by up to six weeks compared to the prior environment. This improved time to market also allowed it to open more stores in a shorter period of time compared to before Fortinet. They said: “Fortinet is an ‘intrinsic enablement tool’ that is installed whenever we are discussing a new physical or virtual environment (e.g., store, plant, etc.). … We’ve been very happy with having a core set of equipment that we can bring into a new environment.
The technology leader in the education industry said that their organization was able to decrease the time needed to set up new sites. Before Fortinet, it could take weeks to deploy a new site; with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, they were able to decrease the deployment time to a maximum of two days. Furthermore, the interviewee noted: “It was a lot simpler as far as the actual setup at the school, too. We didn’t have to have somebody onsite that knew how to configure every switch and all of that. … In that scenario, I don’t need specialists in the field; I just need technicians in the field, and then I need the engineers here managing it.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
In the prior environment, the composite organization:
With Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, the composite reduced the time it takes to open a branch by 50%, down to six weeks.
The composite organization deploys and adopts 60% of its Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment by the end of Year 1. By the end of Year 2, all users are onboarded to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
The composite’s operating margin is 11%.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this benefit:
The number of branches opened in the prior environment and the length of time required to provision new branches.
An organization’s revenue, operating margin, and the portion of revenue earned from branches.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $344,000.
Faster time to market
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Total revenue per branch per week | Composite | $57,692 | $57,692 | $57,692 | |
| F2 | New branches opened per year | Composite | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| F3 | Weeks to open a branch in the prior environment | Composite | 12 | 12 | 12 | |
| F4 | Weeks to open a branch with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge | Interviews | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| F5 | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge adoption ramp | A4 | 60% | 100% | 100% | |
| F6 | Operating margin | B6 | 11% | 11% | 11% | |
| Ft | Improved profit and agility | F1*F2*(F3-F4)*F5*F6 | $114,231 | $190,385 | $190,385 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Ftr | Improved profit and agility (risk-adjusted) | $97,096 | $161,827 | $161,827 | ||
| Three-year total: $420,751 | Three-year present value: $343,594 | |||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
IT help desk optimization. Interviewees noted how their Fortinet environments experience lower support volumes and also decreased the time it took to resolve user issues. This led to productivity improvements for support staff and intervening networking and security staff working to resolve issues and for general business users submitting tickets. Interviewees noted how Fortinet offered improved visibility and context in the triage phase.
The technology leader in the education industry said: “With our call center, [IT support staff] are able to view all the schools or look and see what’s up and what’s down. … A lot of times, we’d have to have somebody actually go out and verify things. [Now], they’re able to resolve a lot of issues very quickly.”
Cyber insurance retention. The IT security administrator in the manufacturing industry said that their organization was able to retain cyber insurance and reduce cyber insurance premiums with their Fortinet configuration.
A Fortinet roadmap, technology partnerships, and channel support and partnership. Interviewees shared how their close partnerships with Fortinet and its evolving and responsive roadmap were key value drivers for their organizations’ Fortinet investments.
The CIO in the retail industry noted: “I truly appreciate the partnership that I have with Fortinet. … The customer service aspect of Fortinet from my perspective is so great compared to my experience with the others that it sells itself to me. … They’re very proactive in helping us understand what you have, what you need to start thinking about replacing, etc. So, that is a distinguishing aspect beyond just the capabilities and tools.”
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Fortinet Secure LAN Edge and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Additional business use cases. Interviewees noted that their organizations were able to develop new engagement models with their customers by leveraging new capabilities with their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment. This included building customer-facing applications and installing customer Wi-Fi and mobile services at branches.
The CIO in the retail industry shared that their organization was able to develop new ways of serving their customers and enhancing operations with their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environments. They reported that their organization’s Fortinet investment allowed it to explore two new initiatives to improve customer experience: “One was to provide wireless for tablets devices and mobile devices that we have. The second was for the concept of a mobile point-of-sale station, which [is] what we would call a ‘line buster’ in retail speak. We’re going to introduce technology at different times and one of those might be to allow mobile devices to scan items for accounting, inventory, etc.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gtr | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs | $0 | $736,659 | $1,136,256 | $1,612,875 | $3,485,790 | $2,820,521 |
| Htr | Deployment costs | $72,864 | $97,152 | $97,152 | $0 | $267,168 | $241,475 |
| Itr | Management costs | $0 | $37,950 | $71,157 | $71,157 | $180,264 | $146,768 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $72,864 | $871,761 | $1,304,565 | $1,684,032 | $3,933,222 | $3,208,764 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees’ organizations had various configurations of FortiSwitches, FortiAPs and FortiGates Fortinet. These organizations also had a variety of additional Fortinet products and services.
Pricing may vary. Contact Fortinet for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the composite organization deploys FortiSwitches, FortiGates, and FortiAP across its entire environment. These solutions are fully deployed by the end of Year 2. Fortinet costs also include FortiManager, warranty, and support costs.
Risks. An organization’s use of Fortinet services and actual costs based on warranty, support, and other costs may impact this cost.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.8 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs | Composite | $0 | $669,690 | $1,032,960 | $1,466,250 |
| Gt | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs | G1 | $0 | $669,690 | $1,032,960 | $1,466,250 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Gtr | Fortinet Secure LAN Edge costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $736,659 | $1,136,256 | $1,612,875 | |
| Three-year total: $3,485,790 | Three-year present value: $2,820,521 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees described how their organizations deployed their respective Fortinet configurations in phases. Multiple interviewees noted their organizations began with FortiGate firewall deployment and expanded their LAN Edge environments to include FortiSwitches, FortiAPs, and other capabilities, including telephony and wireless, and products like FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, FortiEDR, and others.
These phased deployments tended to take one to four weeks per year of fully dedicated effort to install, test, and roll out. In addition to internal effort, some interviewees also discussed working with Fortinet’s professional services and a third-party system integrator. Interviewees noted minimal training due to the technology’s ease of use and integrated interface.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization dedicates four technology FTEs to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge deployment.
In the six-week initial deployment phase, each FTE spends 240 hours on deployment, increasing to 320 hours of deployment labor per FTE in Years 1 and 2.
The fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE is $69.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this cost:
Network and security implementation requirements and complexity.
The internal resources involved in the deployment, how much time each resource dedicates, and the fully burdened salary of each resource.
Training requirements for IT resources and users.
Change management efforts.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $242,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Total FTEs involved in deployment | Interviews | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| H2 | Average hours of deployment effort per FTE | Interviews | 240 | 320 | 320 | 0 |
| H3 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE | Composite | $69 | $69 | $69 | $69 |
| Ht | Deployment costs | H1*H2*H3 | $66,240 | $88,320 | $88,320 | $0 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Htr | Deployment costs (risk-adjusted) | $72,864 | $97,152 | $97,152 | $0 | |
| Three-year total: $267,168 | Three-year present value: $241,475 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported low ongoing administrative costs to manage their Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environments. Not only did interviewees feel the operational resources were lower on a day-to-day basis, but they also highlighted the better quality of the products and close strategic partnership as opposed to other vendors that were more transactional with little investment or engagement to help with operational costs or efficiencies.
The CIO in the retail industry told Forrester: “The Fortinet products are low maintenance. I don’t recall a time when we had to replace faulty equipment. Fortinet offers patches that we prioritize depending on the urgency of the patch.”
The IT security administrator in the manufacturing industry said that it took 4 or 5 hours per week to manage their organization’s Fortinet Secure LAN Edge environment, which was much lower than its prior environment.
The technology leader in the education industry shared that their organization’s team of three had monthly, hour-long check-ins with Fortinet to learn about and integrate new Fortinet products and troubleshoot as needed.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The composite organization dedicates two technology FTEs to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge management in Year 1. As the platform expands, the composite dedicates 2.5 technology FTEs to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge management in Years 2 and 3.
In Year 1, FTEs dedicate 250 hours each to maintaining Fortinet Secure LAN Edge, increasing to 375 hours each in Years 2 and 3.
The fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE is $69.
Risks. The following potential risks may impact this cost:
Ongoing management requirements.
FTEs dedicated to ongoing management, their expertise, and their actual fully burdened salaries.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $147,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | Resources dedicated to maintaining Fortinet Secure LAN Edge | Interviews | 0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| I2 | Hours dedicated to maintaining Fortinet Secure LAN Edge per FTE | Interviews | 0 | 250 | 375 | 375 |
| I3 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a technology FTE | Composite | $69 | $69 | $69 | $69 |
| It | Management costs | I1*I2*I3 | $0 | $34,500 | $64,688 | $64,688 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Itr | Management costs (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $37,950 | $71,157 | $71,157 | |
| Three-year total: $180,264 | Three-year present value: $146,768 | |||||
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($72,864) | ($871,761) | ($1,304,565) | ($1,684,032) | ($3,933,222) | ($3,208,764) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $3,262,845 | $5,984,559 | $6,878,806 | $16,126,209 | $13,080,287 |
| Net benefits | ($72,864) | $2,391,084 | $4,679,994 | $5,194,774 | $12,192,987 | $9,871,523 |
| ROI | 308% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Fortinet Secure LAN Edge can have on an organization.
Interviewed Fortinet stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Fortinet Secure LAN Edge.
Interviewed four decision-makers at organizations using Fortinet Secure LAN Edge to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
2 FortiSwitch FS-448E-FPOE, FortiGate FG-61, FortiAP FAP-321.
3 Regression analysis of the likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches, using the frequency that organizations experienced breaches in the past 12 months as reported by security decision-makers. The composite organization’s revenue is used as the input to the regression formula. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “How many times do you estimate that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months?” Base: 2,769 global security decision-makers.
4 Regression analysis of the reported total cumulative costs of all breaches experienced by security decision-makers’ organizations in the past 12 months. The composite organization’s revenue is used as the input to the regression formula. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “Using your best estimate, what was the total cumulative cost of all breaches experienced by your organization in the past 12 months?” Base: 1,660 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months.
5 Percent of breaches by primary attack vector for breaches, as reported by security decision-makers whose organizations experienced at least one breach in the last 12 months. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2024, “Of the times that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months, please indicate how many of each fall into the categories below.” Base: 1542 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Fortinet and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Fortinet Secure LAN Edge. For any interactive functionality, the intent is for the questions to solicit inputs specific to a prospect's business. Forrester believes that this analysis is representative of what companies may achieve with Fortinet Secure LAN Edge based on the inputs provided and any assumptions made. Forrester does not endorse Fortinet or its offerings. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this model, Fortinet and Forrester Research are unable to accept any legal responsibility for any actions taken on the basis of the information contained herein. The interactive tool is provided ‘AS IS,’ and Forrester and Fortinet make no warranties of any kind.
Fortinet reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Fortinet provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Courtenay O’Connor
Alyssa Dolan
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html