Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By RevealX
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY EXTRAHOP, February 2026
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Economic Impact The Total Economic Impact™ Of ExtraHop RevealXA FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY EXTRAHOP, February 2026 Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By RevealX
Executive SummaryOrganizations require deep visibility into encrypted east-west traffic and anomalous network behavior to detect compromises, such as lateral movement and data exfiltration, before significant damage occurs. This security is essential for an organization’s Zero Trust journey and in maintaining a strong security posture against evolving threats like ransomware and insider threats. ExtraHop RevealX addresses the need for real-time network analysis and visibility (NAV)/network detection and response (NDR) capabilities to identify and mitigate network threats that bypass traditional security tools. ExtraHop RevealX is a NAV/NDR solution that continuously decrypts and analyzes all network traffic out of band to identify anomalous activity, zero-day threats, and threats hiding in encrypted traffic. This provides security teams with high-fidelity detections, automated investigations, and forensic evidence to accelerate threat response and secure their environment against lateral movement. ExtraHop commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying RevealX.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of RevealX on their organizations. To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using RevealX. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a global firm with 15,000 employees and $5 billion in annual revenue. Interviewees said that prior to using RevealX, their organizations used a combination of legacy NDR tools, networking performance monitoring (NPM) tools, and open-source tools for threat detection and analysis. Their legacy NDR tools relied on flow data and metadata but lacked full-packet capture capabilities for in-depth forensic investigation. The interviewees whose organizations had NPM tools in place reported that while the solutions provided network visibility, they lacked the behavioral analytics and security context needed to effectively spot and prioritize covert attacks like lateral movement. Interviewees also reported that their legacy open-source threat detection solutions required extensive manual configuration and lacked centralized management, resulting in delayed incident responses and unnecessarily high alert volumes. The interviewees used RevealX to replace some of their legacy NDR and open-source tools and supplement their NPM tools. With their updated network security stacks, the interviewees’ organizations reduced their risk of security breaches and improved the efficiency of their security teams. The interviewees shared that RevealX significantly reduced their risk of security breaches by providing them with high-fidelity, real-time threat detection capabilities, allowing analysts to stop threats like lateral movement before they cause damage. They shared that these capabilities led to substantial time savings for their security analysts, while also benefiting auditors by supplying verifiable evidence of security controls and incident response. Key FindingsQuantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $5.8 million over three years versus costs of $2.3 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $3.5 million and an ROI of 155%. Reduction in breach risk Up to 48%Key Statistics155%Return on investment (ROI) $5.8MBenefits PV $3.5MNet present value (NPV) <6 monthsPayback Benefits (Three-Year)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Improved security
Network security time savings ong threat response
Auditing time savings
Legacy system and cloud cost savings
The ExtraHop RevealX Customer JourneyDrivers leading to the RevealX investmentInterviews
Key ChallengesInterviewees reported that before investing in RevealX, their organizations had a variety of security tools in place, including NPM tools, endpoint detection tools, open-source threat detection tools, and legacy NDR tools. The interviewees whose organizations had legacy NDR tools in place noted that the tools only provided flow data and metadata and lacked full packet capture, limiting the visibility they had into internal network traffic. Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
Solution RequirementsThe interviewees searched for a solution that could:
Composite OrganizationBased on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis Of BenefitsQuantified benefit data as applied to the compositeTotal Benefits
Improved SecurityEvidence and data. The interviewees reported that using RevealX helped reduce breach likelihood by providing real-time network visibility and high-fidelity detection of malicious activity that often bypassed their traditional security tools. The interviewees detailed their specific security improvements, including:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Improved security will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.1 million. Improved Security
Network Security Time Savings On Threat ResponseEvidence and data. Interviewees shared that RevealX allowed their security teams to reduce the time spent manually investigating and triaging security events through its advanced visibility and threat detection capabilities. With machine learning-based detection and automated decryption, the interviewees’ organizations could immediately pinpoint true positive threats, while also accelerating investigation and response times by eliminating the need to manually stitch together fragmented data sources. The interviewees detailed specific efficiencies, including:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Threat response time savings will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $626,000. Up to 63%Productivity lift on investigating alerts Network Security Time Savings On Threat Response
Auditing Time SavingsEvidence and data. When evaluating NDR vendors, the interviewees’ organizations sought a solution that could ensure compliance with their existing compliance regulations, such as SOC policies, NIST, and PCI DSS. Interviewees shared that RevealX allowed their organizations to maintain their existing compliance and streamline the process of manually collecting and parsing data for audits. RevealX provided their organizations with automated asset discovery and classification, full-scale network visibility, and a complete and untampered record of network activity, saving hours of employee time. Interviewees described a range of ways that RevealX made their internal audit teams more efficient:
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Audit time savings will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $126K. 30%Time savings on preparing for network security audits Auditing Time Savings
Legacy System And Cloud Cost SavingsEvidence and data. Interviewees reported that implementing RevealX allowed their organizations to retire some of their existing security tools, including legacy NDR tools and open-source threat detection tools. Those interviewees’ organizations that implemented RevealX alongside ExtraHop’s NPM module were also able to retire legacy NPM tools. In addition, interviewees shared that RevealX optimized cloud costs by providing full network visibility to identify unauthorized, runaway, or misconfigured workloads that drive unnecessary consumption and compute charges.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The avoided legacy costs will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.9 million. Over $1MCloud cost savings in Year 3 Legacy System And Cloud Cost Savings
Unquantified BenefitsInterviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Voice Of The CustomerRevealX AI Capabilities Interviewees reported several emerging ways RevealX’s AI features were changing their security operations: “We’re seeing that initial triage time is significantly reduced with Smart Triage. We’re seeing the time to triage go from 9 minutes to 4 to 4.5 minutes with these tools because they do a lot of the legwork that was manually done before.” — CISO, software “We are using ExtraHop’s AI assistant to identify issues and to search for predetermined solutions. We can compare an issue with any historical issue to see how it was solved, so we have a path forward and can mitigate issues faster and more accurately.” — Head of portfolio management, manufacturing “ExtraHop has natural language search, which we have started to use more and more frequently to get more detail on security events.” — Managing director, financial services “They’re continuously improving their generative AI [genAI] features, and they’re doing a good job. … They’re very serious about their AI features. They’re not just trying to make it look like they have a genAI thing.” — Managing director, financial services
The managing director at a financial services firm added, “We aim to increase our security posture and decrease our cyber insurance premiums, and RevealX is one of the key ingredients in that.”
FlexibilityThe value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are certain scenarios in which a customer might implement RevealX and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
The head of portfolio management at a manufacturing firm described the impact of the broader ExtraHop suite on improving reliability: “Previously, the networks would go down as well as our network performance monitoring solution. Our network detection and response module would go down, and the communication from our ERP [enterprise resource planning] to our different finance systems, supply chain systems, and manufacturing systems would not work. … If I compare our prior situation of having ExtraHop and our current situation, there is a 10-to-12-hour reduction in downtime per month. Per hour, our downtime costs $65,000.” Prior to implementing ExtraHop, the CISO from the software firm said they dealt with rare but extremely costly customer-facing downtime. They reported a marked reduction, partially driven by the implementation of RevealX: “We also use ExtraHop’s network performance management module, which helps reduce network downtime. Our overall network downtime has come down about 35% since implementing the network performance monitoring piece. … Our [customer-impacting] downtime costs approximately $1.2 million a minute, so those minutes are meaningful.” Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach). Analysis Of CostsQuantified cost data as applied to the compositeTotal Costs
ExtraHop RevealX Subscription CostsEvidence and data. Interviewees reported that their RevealX costs were typically structured on a per-device basis with additional charges for support and professional services. Pricing may vary. Contact ExtraHop for additional details. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes that the composite incurs annual subscription costs of $650,000 in Year 1; these costs include licensing, support, and professional services. As the composite grows and more devices are onboarded, the costs grow to $700,000 in Year 2 and $750,000 in Year 3. The composite also incurs a one-time fee of $130,000 for professional services during the implementation process. Risks. The impact of this cost will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.0 million. ExtraHop RevealX Subscription Costs
Implementation And Training CostsEvidence and data. Interviewees shared that during the implementation process, their organizations dedicated a small team of FTEs to deploying RevealX. Implementation tasks consisted of meeting with ExtraHop, deploying sensors in their network, and configuring the product to determine how alerts will be handled and which type will be escalated. In addition to the deployment process, interviewees reported that some employee time was required for training during the implementation process. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Implementation and training costs will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $89,000. Implementation And Training Costs
Ongoing Management CostsEvidence and data. Interviewees reported that some employee time was dedicated to managing the RevealX deployment, with tasks consisting of meeting with ExtraHop, reviewing network performance, and handling any updates or maintenance. Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Ongoing management costs will vary depending on:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $148,000. Ongoing Management Costs
Financial SummaryConsolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted MetricsCash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs
Total benefits
Cumulative net benefits
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
Please NoteThe financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis. These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section. The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur. From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in RevealX. The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that RevealX can have on an organization. Due DiligenceInterviewed ExtraHop stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to RevealX. InterviewsInterviewed four decision-makers at organizations using RevealX to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks. Composite OrganizationDesigned a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations. Financial Model FrameworkConstructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees. Case StudyEmployed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology. Total Economic Impact ApproachBenefitsBenefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization. CostsCosts comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution. FlexibilityFlexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated. RisksRisks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.” Financial TerminologyPresent value (PV)The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows. Net present value (NPV)The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs. Return on investment (ROI)A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs. Discount rateThe interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%. PaybackThe breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost. Appendix ATotal Economic ImpactTotal Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. Appendix BEndnotes1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders. 2 Source: Cumulative breach costs are computed using the composite organization’s size (revenue or number of employees) as an input to a regression analysis of reported total cumulative costs for all breaches for organizations that experienced at least one breach in the past 12 months. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2025, “Using your best estimate, what was the total cumulative cost of all breaches experienced by your organization in the past 12 months?” Base: 1,740 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months. The cumulative breach cost is then multiplied by a 67% likelihood for organizations to experience one or more breaches in a given year. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2025, “How many times do you estimate that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months?” Base: 2,643 global security decision-makers. 3 Source: Percentage of breaches by primary attack vector, as reported by security decision-makers whose organizations experienced at least one breach in the last 12 months. Source: Forrester’s Security Survey, 2025, “Of the times that your organization’s sensitive data was potentially compromised or breached in the past 12 months, please indicate how many of each fall into the categories below.” Base: 1,766 global security decision-makers who have experienced a breach in the past 12 months. DisclosuresReaders should be aware of the following: This study is commissioned by ExtraHop and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis. Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in RevealX. ExtraHop reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study. ExtraHop provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews. Consulting Team:Matt Dunham PublishedFebruary 2026 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html