A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Ellucian, December 2024
Higher education institutions must embrace digital transformation to modernize outdated processes and challenge perceptions of inefficiency and stagnation.1 Modern solutions offer data-driven insights to improve efficiency, enhance student experiences, streamline administrative processes, and drive innovation. Ellucian’s Colleague SaaS solution facilitates this transformation by providing a centralized platform to streamline an institution’s operations, including admissions, academics, financial aid, finance, and human resources.
Ellucian Colleague SaaS is a cloud-based platform for higher education that combines student information systems (SIS) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) to streamline administrative and academic processes. It offers integrated solutions for admissions, registration, student services, advising, assessment, financial aid, human resources, and finance. Colleague SaaS is part of a broader suite of Ellucian solutions specifically designed for higher education institutions to manage their operations, from student information systems to analytics and community engagement platforms. The SaaS model offers highly configurable workflows, streamlined updates, and reduced maintenance, allowing institutions to focus on more strategic goals.
Ellucian commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Colleague SaaS.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Colleague SaaS on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed eight representatives from seven different educational institutions with experience using Colleague SaaS. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization, a four-year private college with 2,500 students.
Prior to adopting Colleague SaaS, the interviewees’ institutions relied on various commercial and in-house solutions but found these systems unable to scale with their institutions’ growth and the changing needs of students, faculty, and staff. Maintaining on-premises systems with outdated user interfaces and security vulnerabilities consumed significant IT resources and presented difficulties in data management and reporting. These outdated systems and processes resulted in complex and disjointed user experiences that hindered administrative efficiency and student satisfaction.
After selecting Colleague SaaS, the interviewees retired their on-premises solutions and moved the functions those systems formerly managed to the cloud.
Key results from the investment include cost savings from reduced IT infrastructure and maintenance expenses; increased efficiency with streamlined administrative processes, saving thousands of hours annually; and improved student retention through enhanced data analytics and user experience. Additionally, the platform bolsters the institution’s cybersecurity posture by leveraging Ellucian’s security measures and protocols.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $7.20 million over three years versus costs of $3.09 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $4.11 million and an ROI of 133%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Colleague SaaS.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Colleague SaaS can have on an organization.
Interviewed Ellucian stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Colleague SaaS.
Interviewed eight representatives at seven organizations using Colleague SaaS to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Ellucian and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Colleague SaaS.
Ellucian reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Ellucian provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Consulting Team:
Amy Harrison
| Role | Industry | Funding Source | Number Of Students |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIO | Higher education | Private | 5,300 |
| CIO | Higher education | Private | 4,000 |
|
CIO Director of IT |
Higher education | Private | 2,250 |
| CAO (chief academic officer) | Higher education | Private | 1,250 |
| VP of IT | Higher education | Private | 1,000+ |
| Group product manager | Higher education | Public | 11,800 |
| CIO | Higher education | Public | 7,600 |
Before implementing Colleague SaaS, the interviewees’ educational institutions faced numerous challenges with their outdated legacy systems. These systems were unable to keep up with the growth of the institutions and the changing needs of students, faculty, and staff. Maintaining on-premises systems consumed significant IT resources, requiring custom-coded processes, regular updates, patches, and hardware maintenance. Additionally, institutions faced data management and reporting difficulties, outdated user interfaces, and security vulnerabilities. These outdated systems and processes failed to deliver the modern experience required in today’s digital-first environment, resulting in a complex and disjointed user experience that hindered administrative efficiency and student satisfaction.
The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:
The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that:
Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite organization, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the eight interviewees from seven educational institutions, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization is a small, four-year private college with 2,500 students. The school supports students through in-person and online courses; it also offers graduate and certificate opportunities. Following a dip during 2021–23, enrollment numbers are rising again, and the organization seeks offer faculty, staff, and students a more modern, consumer-grade experience as they interact with the school.
Deployment characteristics. The organization previously used an on-premises version of Colleague running on eight servers. After committing to a cloud-first strategy, the organization retires the on-premises IT infrastructure and deploys Colleague SaaS. The platform includes SIS/ERP capabilities, including Ellucian Insights for reporting and analytics and Ellucian Experience. This community engagement hub gives students and staff access to various institutional resources.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Cost savings from transition to the cloud | $655,632 | $655,632 | $655,632 | $1,966,896 | $1,630,460 |
| Btr | Business employee labor cost savings | $1,040,247 | $1,040,247 | $1,040,247 | $3,120,741 | $2,586,940 |
| Ctr | IT employee labor cost savings | $383,184 | $491,184 | $599,184 | $1,473,552 | $1,204,462 |
| Dtr | Increased profit | $137,374 | $137,374 | $137,374 | $412,123 | $341,629 |
| Etr | Avoided cybersecurity-related costs | $578,543 | $578,543 | $578,543 | $1,735,628 | $1,438,750 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $2,794,980 | $2,902,980 | $3,010,980 | $8,708,939 | $7,202,241 | |
Evidence and data. Interviewees highlighted several benefits and improvements from transitioning their on-premises SIS to Ellucian Colleague SaaS. They reported saving money by reducing IT infrastructure and maintenance costs, eliminating on-premises servers and related software licenses, and reducing the need for disaster recovery infrastructure. While some interviewees highlighted the staff reduction potential, most emphasized their ability to reallocate resources toward strategic initiatives.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following for the composite organization:
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. Factors that may impact this benefit include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of more than $1.6 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | On-premises servers removed, including avoided disaster recovery site | Interviews | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| A2 | Server cost | Forrester research | $5,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| A3 | Network cost per server | Forrester research | $750 | $750 | $750 |
| A4 | Server/network hardware maintenance | Forrester research | $4,500 | $4,500 | $4,500 |
| A5 | Software cost | Forrester research | $2,500 | $2,500 | $2,500 |
| A6 | Server software maintenance | Forrester research | $1,500 | $1,500 | $1,500 |
| A7 | Server/network power, cooling, and facilities | Forrester research | $7,200 | $7,200 | $7,200 |
| A8 | Previous on-premises solution cost | Ellucian | $300,000 | $300,000 | $300,000 |
| A9 | Subtotal: Infrastructure cost savings | (A1*(A2+A3+A4+A5+A6+A7))+A8 | $471,600 | $471,600 | $471,600 |
| A10 | IT FTEs managing on-premises solution infrastructure | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| A11 | Percentage of IT FTEs’ time saved | Interviews | 95% | 95% | 95% |
| A12 | Fully burdened annual salary for an IT FTE | Composite | $135,200 | $135,200 | $135,200 |
| A13 | Subtotal: Reduction in server/network admin costs | A9*A10*A11 | $256,880 | $256,880 | $256,880 |
| At | Cost savings from transition to the cloud | A9+A12 | $728,480 | $728,480 | $728,480 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Atr | Cost savings from transition to the cloud (risk-adjusted) | $655,632 | $655,632 | $655,632 | |
| Three-year total: $1,966,896 | Three-year present value: $1,630,460 | ||||
Evidence and data. Ellucian Colleague SaaS was designed specifically for higher education institutions. Its automated workflows and self-service workspaces provide real-time reporting while streamlining administrative and academic processes like student lifecycle management, financial aid, and human resources. The interviewees highlighted several examples of how Colleague SaaS, which includes Ellucian Insights and Ellucian Experience, created efficiencies for different administrative functions and departments so that staff could focus on more strategic initiatives.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Factors that may impact business employee labor cost savings include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of more than $2.6 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Financial aid professionals | Composite | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| B2 | Hours spent running financial aid processes before Ellucian | Interviews | 960 | 960 | 960 |
| B3 | Percentage of time saved after Ellucian | Interviews | 85% | 85% | 85% |
| B4 | Subtotal: Hours saved by financial aid professionals after deploying Ellucian | B1*B2*B3 | 3,264 | 3,264 | 3,264 |
| B5 | Total students | Composite | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 |
| B6 | Hours spent running reports in the registrar’s office per student | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| B7 | Hours spent running reports in the registrar’s office before Ellucian | B5*B6 | 5,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
| B8 | Percentage of time saved after Ellucian | Interviews | 85% | 85% | 85% |
| B9 | Subtotal: Hours saved by professionals in the registrar’s office after Ellucian | B7*B8 | 4,250 | 4,250 | 4,250 |
| B10 | Total faculty | Composite | 250 | 250 | 250 |
| B11 | Hours spent registering, scheduling, and grading per faculty member | Composite | 140 | 140 | 140 |
| B12 | Percentage of time saved after Ellucian | Interview | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| B13 | Subtotal: Hours saved by faculty after Ellucian | B10*B11*B12 | 26,250 | 26,250 | 26,250 |
| B14 | Finance professionals including finance, student billing, and HR | Composite | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| B15 | Hours spent reconciling finance budget reports in before Ellucian | Interviews | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| B16 | Percentage of time saved after Ellucian | Interviews | 90% | 90% | 90% |
| B17 | Subtotal: Hours saved by finance professionals after deploying Ellucian | B13*B14*B15 | 1,800 | 1,800 | 1,800 |
| B18 | Hours saved by deploying Ellucian | B4+B9+B13+B17 | 35,564 | 35,564 | 35,564 |
| B19 | Fully burdened hourly rate for faculty and staff | Composite | $65 | $65 | $65 |
| B20 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Bt | Business employee labor cost savings | B18*B19*B20 | $1,155,830 | $1,155,830 | $1,155,830 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Btr | Business employee labor cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $1,040,247 | $1,040,247 | $1,040,247 | |
| Three-year total: $3,120,741 | Three-year present value: $2,586,940 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees emphasized how moving Colleague to a cloud-based solution enabled their IT staff to shift focus from maintaining outdated systems, pushing upgrades, and coding process changes to becoming strategic partners to education colleagues. The interviewees underscored how they were able to maintain and enhance their systems without adding additional staff and, in some cases, chose not to replace the headcount that left the institution.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Factors that may impact IT employee labor cost savings include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of more than $1.2 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Developers | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| C2 | Hours spent working on SIS before Ellucian (monthly) | Interviews | 160 | 160 | 160 |
| C3 | Percentage of time saved after Ellucian | Interviews | 95% | 95% | 95% |
| C4 | Subtotal: Hours saved by developers after Ellucian | (C1*C2*C3)*12 | 3,648 | 3,648 | 3,648 |
| C5 | IT professionals | Interviews | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| C6 | IT professional hours spent working on SIS before Ellucian (monthly) | Interviews | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| C7 | Percentage of time saved after Ellucian (monthly) | Interviews | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| C8 | Subtotal: Hours saved by IT professionals after Ellucian | (C5*C6*C7)*12 | 5,760 | 5,760 | 5,760 |
| C9 | Average fully burdened hourly rate for IT staff | Composite | $65 | $65 | $65 |
| C10 | Productivity recapture | TEI methodology | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| C11 | Subtotal: IT efficiency savings | (C4+C8)*C9*C10 | $305,760 | $305,760 | $305,760 |
| C12 | Retired IT staff | Interviews | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| C13 | Average fully burdened annual salary for IT staff | Assumption | $120,000 | $120,000 | $120,000 |
| C14 | Subtotal: Savings due to retired IT staff | C12*C13 | $120,000 | $240,000 | $360,000 |
| Ct | IT employee labor cost savings | C11+C14 | $425,760 | $545,760 | $665,760 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Ctr | IT employee labor cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $383,184 | $491,184 | $599,184 | |
| Three-year total: $1,473,552 | Three-year present value: $1,204,462 | ||||
Evidence and data. Student retention has a significant impact on educational institutions’ bottom lines and was of high concern to the interviewees. In a study conducted by Sallie Mae in 2022, 64% of enrolled undergraduate students reported that they were on course to complete their undergraduate degree; 12% considered leaving school; and 24% were “at risk,” either having seriously considered leaving school or at risk of being asked to leave school.3
Interviewees discussed how Ellucian’s Colleague SaaS, which includes Insights, helped improve student retention by offering advanced data analytics, streamlined administrative processes, and a more modern user experience. The interviewees’ institutions were able to identify at-risk students earlier and more efficiently, improve academic advising through better access to comprehensive student data, and make administrative tasks like class registration more accessible to students. Additionally, the platform facilitated program enrollment analysis, allowing the institutions to adjust their academic programs based on student needs and interests.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Factors that may impact the value of increased profit include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $342,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Price charged for new course using Ellucian Insights data | Interviews | $12,000 | $12,000 | $12,000 |
| D2 | New courses developed | Composite | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| D3 | Students taking new courses | Composite | 45 | 45 | 45 |
| D4 | Percentage attributed to Ellucian Insights | Interviews | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| D5 | Subtotal: New revenue stream based on newly developed courses | D1*D2*D3*D4 | $432,000 | $432,000 | $432,000 |
| D6 | Total enrolled students | Composite | 2,500 | 2,500 | 2,500 |
| D7 | Average cost of tuition and fees (after scholarships and grants) of a four-year private college | Education Data Initiative | $31,268 | $31,268 | $31,268 |
| D8 | Percentage of students who drop out before four years | Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System | 28% | 28% | 28% |
| D9 | Percentage improvement based on advising, transparency, and experience | Interviews | 5% | 5% | 5% |
| D10 | Subtotal: Reduced student dropouts based on improved experience | (D6*D7)*D8*D9 | $1,094,380 | $1,094,380 | $1,094,380 |
| D11 | Operating margin | Composite | 10% | 10% | 10% |
| Dt | Increased profit | (D5+D10)*D11 | $152,638 | $152,638 | $152,638 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Dtr | Increased profit (risk-adjusted) | $137,374 | $137,374 | $137,374 | |
| Three-year total: $412,123 | Three-year present value: $341,629 | ||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees said deploying Colleague SaaS significantly bolstered their security efforts. By shifting responsibility for security management to Ellucian, the interviewees’ institutions benefited from its advanced security measures and expertise, which included regular updates, patches, and robust monitoring. The move to Ellucian’s cloud-based solutions improved the institutions’ disaster recovery and business continuity posture while reducing the need for additional security staffing. Ellucian’s centralized security management controls simplified report production and documentation, streamlining compliance and auditing processes. The transition to the cloud not only enhanced the institutions’ data and systems security but also afforded the interviewees peace of mind knowing their infrastructure was safeguarded by Ellucian’s comprehensive security protocols.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Factors that may impact the financial benefit associated with avoided security costs include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of more than $1.4 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Recruiter hours spent to hire a security professional | Composite | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| E2 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a recruiter | Composite | $57 | $57 | $57 |
| E3 | Recruiter costs saved | E1*E2 | $1,710 | $1,710 | $1,710 |
| E4 | Avoided fully burdened annual salary for IT security | Composite | $170,000 | $170,000 | $170,000 |
| E5 | Subtotal: Avoided cost of recruiting and hiring cybersecurity-related staff | E3+E4 | $171,710 | $171,710 | $171,710 |
| E6 | Likelihood of experiencing one or more breaches per year | Forrester research | 63% | 63% | 63% |
| E7 | Mean cumulative cost of breaches | Forrester research | $2,140,000 | $2,140,000 | $2,140,000 |
| E8 | Percentage of breaches originating from external sources | Forrester research | 62.4% | 62.4% | 62.4% |
| E9 | Percentage of external attacks addressable with Ellucian | Interviews | 70% | 70% | 70% |
| E10 | Annual risk exposure addressable with Ellucian | E6*E7*E8*E9 | $588,894 | $588,894 | $588,894 |
| E11 | Reduced risk of breaches from external attacks with Ellucian | Interviews | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| E12 | Subtotal: Avoided Cybersecurity-Related Costs | E10*E11 | $471,115 | $471,115 | $471,115 |
| Et | Avoided cybersecurity-related costs | E5+E12 | $642,825 | $642,825 | $642,825 |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | ||||
| Etr | Avoided cybersecurity-related costs (risk-adjusted) | $578,543 | $578,543 | $578,543 | |
| Three-year total: $1,735,628 | Three-year present value: $1,438,750 | ||||
Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Colleague SaaS and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility could also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | Fees paid to Ellucian | $0 | $971,250 | $1,000,125 | $636,694 | $2,608,069 | $2,187,862 |
| Gtr | Planning and implementation costs | $396,000 | $264,000 | $198,000 | $132,000 | $990,000 | $898,810 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $396,000 | $1,235,250 | $1,198,125 | $768,694 | $3,598,069 | $3,086,672 | |
Evidence and data. Ellucian Colleague SaaS operates on a subscription pricing model, where institutions pay a recurring fee to access and use the platform, typically on an annual basis. The pricing is based on the institution’s size and allows for flexibility as the institution grows. The subscription fee includes:
Ellucian charges separately for professional services to implement Colleague SaaS and other modules, typically structured as a combination of fixed fees and time-and-materials costs. Fixed fees are often associated with specific phases of implementation projects, such as initial setup, configuration, and basic training.
For more customized services, such as advanced configuration, data migration, and more extensive training, Ellucian may charge on a time-and-materials basis, depending on the actual hours worked and resources used.
Ellucian also offers consulting services to help institutions optimize their Colleague SaaS deployment. . These services can include process reengineering, change management, and advanced user training, and they are typically billed separately. One CIO mentioned engaging Ellucian Professional Services for refresher and optimization sessions to get more of their subject matter experts involved and engaged with Ellucian Live and drive interest in change.
Modeling and assumptions. Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Factors that may impact the costs associated with Ellucian licensing and professional services include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.2 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | License cost for Ellucian Colleague, Experience Premium, and Insights Premium | Composite | $550,000 | $577,500 | $606,375 | |
| F2 | Implementation cost | Composite | $375,000 | $375,000 | ||
| Ft | Fees paid to Ellucian | F1+F2 | $925,000 | $952,500 | $606,375 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑5% | |||||
| Ftr | Fees paid to Ellucian (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $971,250 | $1,000,125 | $636,694 | |
| Three-year total: $2,608,069 | Three-year present value: $2,187,862 | |||||
Evidence and data. The implementation of Ellucian’s Colleague SaaS platform took most interviewees 12 to 18 months, although this varied by institution and its project management approach. Planning and implementation involved project managers and technical teams as well as institutional stakeholders and subject matter experts from involved departments.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. Factors that may impact the costs associated with planning, implementation, and ongoing platform and change management include:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $899,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | IT professionals involved in planning and implementation | Composite | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| G2 | Business professionals involved in planning and implementation | Composite | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| G3 | Average fully burdened monthly salary for implementation team | Composite | $10,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | |
| G4 | Months spent on planning and implementation | Composite | 12 | ||||
| G5 | Percentage of time IT professionals spent on implementation | Composite | 70% | ||||
| G6 | Percentage of time business professionals spent on implementation | Composite | 40% | ||||
| G7 | Subtotal: Cost of IT professionals’ time spent on implementation | G1*G3*G4*G5 | $168,000 | ||||
| G8 | Subtotal: Cost of business professionals’ time spent on implementation | G2*G3*G4*G6 | $192,000 | ||||
| G9 | Percentage of time IT professionals spend on ongoing change management and application support | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | ||
| G10 | Subtotal: Cost of IT professionals’ time for ongoing change management and implementation support | ((G1+G2)*G3*G9)*12 | $240,000 | $180,000 | $120,000 | ||
| Gt | Planning and implementation costs | G7+G8 | $360,000 | $240,000 | $180,000 | $120,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | ||||||
| Gtr | Planning and implementation costs (risk-adjusted) | $396,000 | $264,000 | $198,000 | $132,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $990,000 | Three-year present value: $898,810 | ||||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($396,000) | ($1,235,250) | ($1,198,125) | ($768,694) | ($3,598,069) | ($3,086,672) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $2,794,980 | $2,902,980 | $3,010,980 | $8,708,939 | $7,202,241 |
| Net benefits | ($396,000) | $1,559,730 | $1,704,855 | $2,242,286 | $5,110,870 | $4,115,569 |
| ROI | 133% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months | |||||
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value delivered to the business by the product. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and the measure of costs, allowing for a full examination of the effect of the technology on the entire organization.
Costs consider all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the product. The cost category within TEI captures incremental costs over the existing environment for ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. Having the ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
Related Forrester Research
Kate Leggett, Knowing When To Migrate To An Industry CRM, Forrester Blogs
How To Adopt Industry CRM, Forrester Research, Inc., April 8, 2024
The Enterprise Resource Planning Solutions For Service-Centric Industries Landscape, Q1 2024, Forrester Research, Inc., February 20, 2024
Enterprise Resource Planning Market Insights, 2023, Forrester Research, Inc., September 25, 2023
Ellucian: Transforming Demand Program Planning And Results, Forrester Research, Inc., April 30, 2021
1 Source: Wes Johnson, Michele Norin, Lisa Trubitt, and Luke VanWingerden, 2025 EDUCAUSE Top 10 #2: Administrative Simplification, EDUCAUSE Review, October 23, 2024.
2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists vendors in communicating the value proposition of their products and services to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders.
3 Source: How America Completes College 2024, Ipsos and Sallie Mae, 2024.
4 Source: Forrester's Security Survey, 2024. Base: 162 Security decision-makers with network, data center, app security, or security ops responsibilities in public sector roles. Forrester annually assesses cybersecurity metrics through interviews, surveys, and expertise in the field. Analyses are provided with information rooted with specific data sets most accurately applied to the situations that have been collected in the study.
Cookie Preferences
Accept Cookies
A cookie is a small text file that a website saves on your computer or mobile device when you visit the site. It enables the website to remember your actions (data inputs, website navigation), so you don’t have to re-enter data when you come back to the site or browse from one page to another.
Behavioral information collected by our web analytics vendor is used to analyze data pertaining to visitor trends, plan website enhancements, and measure overall website effectiveness. We may also use cookies or web beacons to help us offer you products, programs, or services that may be of interest to you and to deliver relevant advertising. We may use third-party advertising companies to help tailor website content to users or to serve ads on our behalf. These companies may also employ cookies and web beacons to measure advertising effectiveness.
Please accept cookies and the collection of behavioral information to receive full functionality and enhance your experience. If you decline cookies, some features of the website may not function normally.
Please see our
Privacy Policy for more information.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html