Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Clari

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Clari

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Clari, September 2025

[CONTENT]

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Clari

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Clari

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY Clari, September 2025

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

Fragmented systems, inconsistent forecasting processes, and limited pipeline visibility can hinder growth, reduce agility, and introduce costly inefficiencies across sales and operations teams. These environments impede effective collaboration and timely decision-making. However, companies have an opportunity to embrace integrated platforms with advanced analytics to transform their approach to revenue management, streamline related workflows, and empower teams with real-time insights to maximize pipeline conversion as well as seller and broader commercial potential.

Clari is a revenue orchestration platform that enables sales, operations, customer success, marketing, and finance teams in manufacturing, energy, software, and other industries to manage forecasting, pipeline visibility, and deal inspection in order to drive execution, gain insights to manage accounts, collaborate across teams, and close deals.

Clari commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Clari.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Clari on their organizations.

398%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$96.2M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed six decision-makers across five organizations with experience using Clari. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization.

Interviewees said that prior to using Clari, their organizations lacked pipeline visibility and process standardization across disconnected systems and ad hoc reporting; subsequently, teams could not reduce variance in missed forecasting targets without the historical data or analytical capabilities to diagnose issues. Collaboration across finance, sales, and customer success functions was manual and siloed. This contributed to a broader lack of trust in forecasting, especially among executive stakeholders, who questioned the reliability of projections and hesitated to make investment decisions based on them. These challenges collectively underscored the need for a more structured, integrated, and scalable forecasting solution.

After the investment in Clari, the interviewees increased efficiencies in their sales processes with improved coaching, streamlined workflows, and more accurate forecasts on which to base strategic decisions. Key results from the investment include revenue growth through increased new business win rates and expansions in existing accounts, along with higher customer spend, risk reduction through improved forecast accuracy, reduced misallocated funds, improved investment decisions, and reduced customer churn.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Increased pipeline size by 3% and increased new business win rate by 6%. The composite organization gains better visibility into data and more accurate forecasting. This allows sales reps to identify and pursue promising market segments, respond swiftly to pipeline changes, automate prospecting workflows with Groove, and prioritize high-value opportunities, resulting in stronger collaboration and alignment. Clari’s analytics enable detection of deal-stage weaknesses and strategy refinement, empowering sales representatives with actionable insights and ultimately driving higher close rates. Over three years, business growth from new accounts is worth $25.3 million to the composite organization.

  • Increased retention by 3.5% and increased customer spend by 2.5%. Clari empowers the composite’s customer success and account management teams by providing enhanced visibility into account activity, enabling them to spot upsell and cross-sell opportunities sooner and more reliably. This improved transparency streamlines collaboration between sales, renewals, and customer success, reducing administrative workload and helping staff focus on high-potential opportunities. Clari’s platform improves opportunity management and ensures the composite’s teams do not overlook valuable expansion prospects due to data silos or inconsistent processes. Over three years, business growth from expanding existing accounts is worth $52.3 million to the composite organization.

  • Reduced misallocated funds by 90%. With Clari, the composite organization can depend on precise forecasts and is better equipped to set revenue goals, allocate resources efficiently, and make strategic decisions. Enhanced forecast accuracy empowers leaders to grow confidently, plan their workforce, and focus on initiatives that drive the greatest impact. Over three years, improved investment allocations using better forecasting accuracy is worth $14.1 million to the composite organization.

  • Reduced forecasting activities by 33%. Clari centralizes information from multiple sources and offers user-friendly tools that simplify analysis and team collaboration at the composite organization. As a result, sales and revenue operations teams can act quickly with better insights, leading to increased productivity and more efficient forecasting processes. Over three years, enhanced productivity for managers and revenue operations is worth $3.8 million to the composite organization.

  • Saved 50% of time on administration. With Clari, the composite streamlines communication over a user-friendly interface that equips teams to consistently follow best practices. It also simplifies CRM updates and activity tracking by enabling real-time logging and integration with the CRM. Clari provides comprehensive visibility across the customer journey, making it easier for teams to access critical account and pipeline information without switching between systems. Over three years, the reduced administrative burden for sales and customer success is worth $22.7 million to the composite organization.

  • Saved 2 IT developer FTEs. The composite’s implementation of Clari requires less effort from IT teams than its current CRM configurations and disparate tools. After deploying Clari, the composite decommissions some if its prior environment and saves on licensing and maintenance. Over three years, the IT department and legacy environment savings are worth $2.2 million to the composite organization

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Improved visibility and transparency. Clari provides a unified, real-time view of forecasts and pipelines across multiple CRM instances for the composite organization, simplifying complexity for sales operations leaders. Executives gain instant access to data to product and regional insights, enhancing decision-making. This visibility empowers frontline managers and makes Clari an essential tool for the composite’s organizationwide sales efforts.

  • Improved collaboration and cross-functional alignment. The composite enables greater alignment between marketing and sales on pipeline forecasts and fosters collaboration across departments, including sales, renewals, legal, customer success, and deal operations. Stakeholders contribute their perspectives directly in Clari for unified forecasting. This cross-functional integration also strengthens connections with leadership teams.

  • More strategic decision-making. With improved forecast accuracy, the composite leverages the platform for headcount and territory planning, as well as for guiding investment and expansion based on forecast trends.

  • Improved process discipline. Standardization through the Clari platform eliminates shadow hierarchies at the composite, driving alignment, efficiency, and accountability across the organization. As a result, the business achieves greater scalability and repeatability across teams.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Subscription and professional services. The composite organization incurs subscription costs based on the number of users and modules of Clari deployed. It also incurs professional services costs for the implementation and ongoing use of Clari. Over three years, the composite pays $19.1 million in subscription and professional services costs.

  • Implementation and ongoing administration. The composite dedicates a portion of its IT and business FTEs’ time to implementation and a portion of IT FTEs’ time for ongoing administration. Over three years, the composite pays $582,000 in implementation and ongoing administration costs.

  • User training. All users of Clari at the composite organization are trained for 8 hours during onboarding, followed by 4 hours of ongoing training annually. Over three years, the composite pays $4.5 million in training costs.

The financial analysis that is based on the interviews found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $120.3 million over three years versus costs of $24.2 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $96.2 million and an ROI of 398%.

“Clari has facilitated communication and collaboration between our prime sales team and the renewals team. Over time, Clari has gradually become a center of gravity for selling broadly— and selling really takes a village. That kind of collaboration and alignment to support a village happens in Clari.”

Senior director of sales operations, security

Key Statistics

398%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$120.3M

Benefits PV 

$96.2M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Business growth from new accounts Business growth from expanding existing accounts Improved investment allocations using better forecasting accuracy Enhanced productivity for managers and revenue operations Reduced administrative burden for sales and customer success IT department and legacy environment savings

The Clari Customer Journey

Drivers leading to the Clari investment
Interviews
Role Industry Geography Revenue
Director of global business excellence Manufacturing Global $45 billion
Global sales operations lead Software Global $21.5 billion
Senior director of sales operations Security Global $4.5 billion
• Vice president of sales operations
• Senior director of global sales operations
Software Global $750 million
Chief sales officer Energy Global $500 million
Key Challenges

Before deploying Clari, interviewees across organizations described a range of challenges that hindered forecasting accuracy, operational efficiency, and strategic alignment. Manual, spreadsheet-based forecasting was common, consuming significant time and resources while limiting visibility into pipeline health and performance trends. Internal data limitations and fragmented CRM environments further complicated efforts. Processes were time-consuming, error-prone, and inconsistent, with different teams using varied methodologies and tools, leading to confusion and inefficiencies.

Interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Manual, spreadsheet-based forecasting and internal data limitations that consumed resources. Before adopting Clari, the interviewees’ organizations relied heavily on manual forecasting processes that consumed significant time and resources. The chief sales officer in energy described how forecasting was managed through spreadsheets, requiring hours of manual effort and making it difficult to track performance over time: “It was being done manually on spreadsheets. They were turning into monsters.” Similarly, the global sales operations lead in software noted that forecasting was done offline in spreadsheets, which overwhelmed the process: “It got to the point where it was just untenable. We had lots of manual processes, lots of handoffs, and lots of errors. It took a ton of time. There was so much administrative work that we had to find a better way.” The director of global business excellence in manufacturing reported that their organization lacked even basic analytics and relied on anecdotal assumptions, with no ability to generate meaningful forecasts or insights from its data.

  • Time-consuming, error-prone, and inconsistent processes. The senior director of sales operations in security explained that their organization’s previous tool was unreliable and frequently crashed during critical end-of-quarter periods, forcing operations teams to build backup spreadsheets and manually clean data exports. The vice president of sales operations in software described how sales leaders’ spreadsheets, each with their own methodology, led to inconsistent rollups and a lack of clarity across their organization. These fragmented approaches made it difficult to inspect pipeline health, align expectations, or manage forecasts effectively.

  • Missed and untrustworthy forecasts without the ability to track issues. Interviewees struggled to understand why forecasts were missed due to the lack of historical tracking and analytical capabilities. The chief sales officer in energy noted that prior to Clari, their organization had no way to reference past forecasts to learn from over- or under-performance, making it difficult to improve planning accuracy. The director of global business excellence in manufacturing shared that their organization’s previous approach involved rolling up numbers week by week without any structured forecasting, resulting in no visibility into forecast accuracy or the reasons behind missed targets. This lack of insight hindered their ability to diagnose issues and course-correct, while the absence of reliable forecasting tools eroded trust in the data and the process. The interviewee said: “What we quickly found was a need to pivot and actually penetrate the market in a thoughtful way through data. Before Clari, we were making a lot of anecdotal assumptions around why things were what they were, which is just a sloppy approach. It’s sloppy management and doesn’t work for anyone.”

  • A lack of visibility and standardization. Prior to Clari, interviewees’ organizations faced significant challenges in achieving visibility and standardization across teams. The global sales operations lead in software described how their company’s complex CRM environment, which was fragmented across multiple acquired businesses, made it difficult to aggregate data and manage forecasts uniformly. Clari helped abstract away that complexity and provided a unified view. The senior director of sales operations in security explained that before Clari’s integration with their CRM, disconnects between the sales hierarchy represented in a prior forecasting tool and the hierarchy maintained in CRM had emerged, creating confusion.

  • Scalability and collaboration challenges. As the interviewees’ organizations grew, their legacy forecasting tools failed to scale effectively. The senior director of sales operations in security noted that as the business expanded from $600 million to $3 billion in ARR [annual recurring revenue], and their previous tool could not support the increasing complexity or number of users without extensive custom development. The interviewee said, “We needed a tool that was enterprise-proven.” The director of global business excellence in manufacturing noted that prior to Clari, manual processes were not scalable and required significant effort to manage across divisions. Clari’s structured platform enabled broader adoption, streamlined collaboration between sales and other departments, and supported strategic decisions at scale.

Solution Requirements

The interviewees searched for a solution that could:

  • Reduce risk with improved forecast accuracy and fewer misallocated funds.

  • Increase operational efficiency and reduce labor costs.

  • Enable strategic decision-making.

  • Drive revenue growth and pipeline quality.

  • Support cross-functional collaboration.

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

  • Description of composite. The $10-billion organization is supported by 4,000 sales team members, 400 sales managers, and 200 revenue operations team members. Eighty percent of its revenue is from existing business and 20% is earned through new business.

  • Deployment characteristics. After the initial implementation period involving 10 IT and business FTEs, the composite organization deploys Clari, Copilot, and Groove fully to all users by Year 1.

Composite Assumptions
Ref. Metric Source Input
  Company    
R1 Annual revenue Composite $10,000,000,000
R2 Revenue from existing business Composite 80%
R3 Revenue from new business Composite 20%
R4 Operating profit margin Composite 10%
  Sales    
R5 Broad sales team members including new business, account managers, customer success, and managers Composite 4,000
R6 Revenue operations team members Composite 200
R7 Managers Composite 400
R8 Breakout of sales team by new vs. existing business Composite 80%, matching retention rate

 KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  • $10 billion in annual revenue

  • 4,000 sales team members

  • 200 revenue operations team members

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data as applied to the composite
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Business growth from new accounts $6,460,000 $10,144,000 $14,688,000 $31,292,000 $25,291,510
Btr Business growth from expanding existing accounts $4,808,000 $22,592,000 $38,960,000 $66,360,000 $52,313,208
Ctr Improved investment allocations using better forecasting accuracy $2,528,170 $5,680,048 $9,482,832 $17,691,050 $14,117,183
Dtr Enhanced productivity for managers and revenue operations $954,720 $1,591,200 $2,100,384 $4,646,304 $3,761,018
Etr Reduced administrative burden for sales and customer success $6,177,600 $9,389,952 $12,355,200 $27,922,752 $22,658,936
Ftr IT department and legacy environment savings $539,750 $1,079,500 $1,079,500 $2,698,750 $2,193,875
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $21,468,240 $50,476,700 $78,665,916 $150,610,856 $120,335,730
Business Growth From New Accounts

Evidence and data. Interviewees noted that Clari’s streamlined data visibility and enhanced forecasting empowered teams to target new market segments more effectively and capitalize on emerging opportunities. Additionally, the ability to inspect pipeline health in real time equipped the interviewees’ organizations to redirect resources quickly, ensuring that high-potential accounts received priority attention and support. Improved collaboration between sales teams as well as better alignment of strategic objectives accompanied this growth. By leveraging Clari’s integrated analytics and insights, sales reps consistently identified and captured previously overlooked business, fueling sustainable expansion and increasing total benefits over time. Interviewees said Clari supported this improvement in new business win rates by:

    • Diagnosing critical deal-stage weaknesses. This included demo quality and contracting language, which were previously invisible to teams at the interviewees’ organizations.

    • Enabling targeted interventions. Clari surfaced where and why deals were being lost, allowing teams at the interviewees’ organizations to refine messaging and streamline legal processes.

    • Empowering reps with actionable insights. These insights into pipeline health and deal progression helped reps at the interviewees’ organizations focus on high-risk opportunities and improve close rates.

  • The director of global business excellence in manufacturing described how Clari helped their organization recalibrate its pipeline coverage assumptions. Previously, their team estimated they needed three times the pipeline coverage to hit targets, but Clari’s data and visibility revealed that only 1.8 times the coverage was sufficient; with the ability to form an achievable plan, their team was able to appropriately resource and achieved their targets. Their organization’s new business win rate rose from approximately 12% to 15%, to 20%, representing nearly a 2x improvement.

  • The chief sales officer in the energy industry described the transformation in pipeline driven by improved messaging and training, informed by insights from Clari’s integrated tools: “We were not getting any pipeline in a specific segment. Then we leveraged the call recording feature from Groove to identify why. Now, we’re driving pipeline.” After implementing Clari, this segment went up to $400,000 in pipeline value for this interviewee’s organization. Their team increased win rates from 16% to 22%.

  • The senior director of sales operations in security said that Clari’s analytics modules enabled better inspection of pipeline health and facilitated accountability at the rep level, helping their team focus on high-quality opportunities and reduce placeholder deals. Their organization’s week two pipeline conversion rate — defined as the percentage of pipeline at week two of the quarter that ultimately converted to bookings — used to range between 30% to 35%. After implementing Clari, that rate increased to 35% to 40% and, in some geographies, reached 45%.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • To handle pipeline, 800 sales team members use Clari.

  • The new business revenue managed per salesperson before Clari is $2.5 million. Revenue from new business before Clari is $2.0 billion.

  • The average new business win rate across sales reps before Clari is 16%.

  • With Clari, pipeline sizes increase by 1.5% in Year 1, 2.25% in Year 2, and 3% in Year 3, resulting in incremental revenue due to large pipeline of $30,000,000 in Year 1, $45,000,000 in Year 2, and $60,000,000 in Year 3.

  • With Clari, the win rate increases 2.5% in Year 1, 4% in Year 2, and 6% in Year 3, resulting in incremental revenue increases of $50,750,000              in Year 1, $81,800,000 in Year 2, and $123,600,000 in Year 3.

  • The operating profit margin is 10%.

Risks. The impact of this benefit will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The organization’s ability to diagnose and act on deal-stage weaknesses.

  • The maturity and cleanliness of pipeline data prior to Clari.

  • The degree of adoption and usage of Clari’s pipeline inspection and forecasting features.

  • The organization’s ability to implement targeted interventions based on Clari insights.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $25.3 million.

6%

Increased win rate attributable to Clari

“Last year, win rates were dropping in one of our segments. We used tools like Clari Copilot to identify areas to improve, which allowed us to make decisions over a complicated portfolio of solutions in the segment. We listened to a large volume of calls, which then allowed us to build a dedicated training program the Copilot recordings unlocked. It pushed the team to increase win rates from 16% to 22% currently with ASP [average selling price] up about 10% and continuing to trend positive.”

Chief sales officer, energy

Business Growth From New Accounts
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Sales team members using Clari to handle pipeline Composite 800 800 800
A2 New business revenue managed per salesperson before Clari Composite $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000
A3 Revenue from new business before Clari A1*A2 $2,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000
A4 Average new business win rate across salespeople before Clari Composite 16% 16% 16%
A5 Total pipeline size across streams handled with Clari A3/A4 $12,500,000,000 $12,500,000,000 $12,500,000,000
A6 Percentage increase in pipeline attributable to Clari Interviews 1.50% 2.25% 3.00%
A7 Increased pipeline value attributable to Clari A5*A6 $187,500,000 $281,250,000 $375,000,000
A8 Subtotal: Incremental revenue closed due to larger pipeline A4*A7 $30,000,000 $45,000,000 $60,000,000
A9 Increased win rate attributable to Clari Interviews 2.50% 4.00% 6.00%
A10 Subtotal: Incremental revenue increase due to higher win rate (A5+A7)*A4*A9 $50,750,000 $81,800,000 $123,600,000
A11 Revenue growth attributable to Clari A8+A10 $80,750,000 $126,800,000 $183,600,000
A12 Operating profit margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
At Business growth from new accounts A11*A12 $8,075,000 $12,680,000 $18,360,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Atr Business growth from new accounts (risk-adjusted)   $6,460,000 $10,144,000 $14,688,000
Three-year total: $31,292,000 Three-year present value: $25,291,510
Business Growth From Expanding Existing Accounts

Evidence and data. Interviewees described how Clari enabled their customer success and account management teams to deepen relationships with existing customers and unlock expansion opportunities. By improving visibility into account activity, Clari helped teams identify upsell and cross-sell potential earlier and more reliably. This visibility also facilitated better collaboration across sales, renewals, and customer success teams, ensuring that expansion opportunities were not missed due to siloed data or inconsistent processes.

Interviewees said Clari supported this growth by:

  • Freeing up seller time. Clari reduced administrative burden at the interviewees’ organizations.

  • Improving opportunity management. Interviewees also explained that it improved visibility across multiple CRM instances.

  • Helping customer service and account managers focus on the right opportunities. This was especially the case for those requiring executive support or strategic attention at the interviewees’ organizations.

Interviewees experienced the following:

  • The director of global business excellence in manufacturing noted that existing customer retention rates improved from around 60% to 85%. The interviewee described how Clari helped their team diagnose that losses were occurring during two critical stages: the demo and the contracting process. These were expensive points to lose business and, prior to Clari, their organization lacked the analytics to pinpoint that issues arose in these areas. Once Clari highlighted these problem areas, the interviewee’s team was able to take targeted corrective actions, including refining the demo experience and improving legal language in contracts. These changes contributed to a 25-point increase in retention rates for their organization’s existing customers. Clari’s capabilities enabled their organization to shift from anecdotal assumptions to data-driven decision-making, allowing them to focus on the most impactful areas of the sales cycle.

  • The global sales operations lead in the software industry noted that with Clari, retention increased from 83% to 88%. They emphasized that Clari played a key role in scaling large deal volume within existing accounts, with a 20% increase in cross-sell and upsells, 20% of which the interviewee attributed to Clari. Clari’s opportunity scoring and pipeline tracking helped managers focus on deals that required attention, enabling scalable growth from existing customers. The interviewee noted that average customer spend increased from $150,000 to $200,000, and the number of $1 million to $5 million deals tripled over five years with smaller accounts increasing annual spend to $50,000.

  • The senior director of sales operations in security explained that Clari facilitated collaboration between the prime sales and renewals teams, which was essential for expanding existing accounts, stating, “Clari has facilitated communication and collaboration that has supported our ability to close larger deals.” The interviewee also reported that the number of million-dollar-plus transactions grew by 20% to 30% year over year, driven in part by Clari’s ability to centralize deal notes and forecasting inputs across teams. Sales rep attainment also improved by 5 percentage points; while the number of reps hitting quota remained stable, the average attainment across the team increased. The senior director of sales operations in security attributed this to Clari’s efficiency gains and improved visibility into rep performance, which allowed for more targeted coaching and better quota setting.

  • The vice president of sales operations in software noted that Clari enabled their organization to track renewals and expansion opportunities more effectively. This holistic view of the customer journey helped their organization avoid customer churn and identify expansion opportunities that might otherwise have been missed: “We track renewals in Clari. We can see all activity against a prospect or customer account [and] whether or not there’s an opportunity associated.”

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • There are 3,200 customer success and account management staff using Clari. Each handles an average of $2.5 million in retained revenue.

  • With Clari, retention increases 0.25% in Year 1, 2% in Year 2, and 3.5% in Year 3.

  • With Clari, customer spend increases 0.5% in Year 1, 1.5% in Year 2, and 2.5% in Year 3.

  • The operating profit margin is 10%.

Risks. The impact of this benefit will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The level of Clari adoption across teams managing existing accounts and the organization’s subsequent visibility into post-sale deal progression and renewal cycles.

  • The effectiveness of cross-functional collaboration between sales and customer success teams.

  • The organization’s ability to refine and standardize processes.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $52.3 million.

3.5%

Increase in retention rate attributable to Clari

“Our existing customer landscape now has about an 85% renewal rate, up 20 points in the last seven months.”

Director of global business excellence, manufacturing

Business Growth From Expanding Existing Accounts
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Customer success and account management staff using Clari Composite 3,200 3,200 3,200
B2 Average revenue per customer success and account manager from retained accounts prior to Clari Composite $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000
B3 Revenue from retention before Clari B1*B2 $8,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000
B4 Increase in retention rate attributable to Clari Interviews 0.25% 2.00% 3.50%
B5 Subtotal: Incremental revenue growth from higher retention with Clari B3*B4 $20,000,000 $160,000,000 $280,000,000
B6 Increase in customer spend attributable to Clari Interviews 0.50% 1.50% 2.50%
B7 Subtotal: Incremental revenue growth from higher cross-sell and upsell with Clari (B3+B5)*B6 $40,100,000 $122,400,000 $207,000,000
B8 Revenue growth attributable to Clari B5+B7 $60,100,000 $282,400,000 $487,000,000
B9 Operating profit margin Composite 10% 10% 10%
Bt Business growth from expanding existing accounts B8*B9 $6,010,000 $28,240,000 $48,700,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Btr Business growth from expanding existing accounts (risk-adjusted)   $4,808,000 $22,592,000 $38,960,000
Three-year total: $66,360,000 Three-year present value: $52,313,208
Improved Investment Allocations Using Better Forecasting Accuracy

Evidence and data. Interviewees said that accurate forecasting was critical not only for hitting revenue targets but also for guiding strategic investments, resource allocation, and organizational planning. When forecasts were reliable, the interviewees’ organizations were able to confidently scale, optimize headcount, and prioritize high-impact initiatives — turning predictability into a competitive advantage. Interviewees reported improved forecast accuracy with Clari:

  • The senior director of sales operations in security explained that their forecast accuracy improved from being 8% to 9% off target to just 5% to 6% off target, even after switching to a more volatile metric — incremental annual contract value (IACV). This improvement was especially notable because IACV is more difficult to predict than traditional annual contract value (ACV) or total contract value (TCV) models. The enhanced accuracy allowed the interviewee’s organization to avoid over-hiring and overspending and make more informed decisions about where to pause or accelerate investments based on real-time forecast performance.

  • The director of global business excellence in manufacturing described that prior to Clari, their organization had no formal forecasting process, relying instead on anecdotal, week-over-week rollups that lacked rigor and visibility. After implementing Clari, the interviewee reported achieving 96% forecast accuracy, a level that earned trust from corporate leadership and unlocked strategic funding. This newfound credibility enabled the team to justify investment requests and demonstrate operational maturity, which was critical for securing resources in a highly competitive internal environment.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Before Clari, 5% of operating profits are misallocated, 25% of which are misallocated due to forecast misguidance.

  • With Clari, the reduction in misallocated funds is 25% in Year 1, 55% in Year 2, and 90% in Year 3.

Risks. The impact of this benefit will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The volatility and complexity of the metrics being forecasted (e.g., IACV vs. ACV or TCV).

  • The organization’s historical forecasting practices and baseline accuracy.

  • The degree of Clari adoption across sales, finance, and operations teams.

  • The organization’s ability to act on forecast insights to adjust hiring, spending, and strategic investments in real time.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $14.1 million.

90%

Reduction in misallocated funds

“We want teams within, at an absolute minimum, 10% above or below with forecast accuracy. If you are within 10% of your forecast, that’s yellow on a traffic light analogy. Really, we want people within 5%, which would be green on the scorecard. And if you go back to when we were forecasting in ACV and TCV, typically, our forecast accuracy across the business was around 8 to 9% typically. And we are closer now with Clari to 5 or 6% on IACV, a metric that’s fundamentally harder to forecast.”

Senior director of sales operations, security

Improved Investment Allocations Using Better Forecasting Accuracy
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Total operating profits for the business (A3+B3)*B9+Atr+Btr $1,011,268,000 $1,032,736,000 $1,053,648,000
C2 Percentage of profits misallocated before Clari Composite 5% 5% 5%
C3 Percentage misallocated due to forecast misguidance Composite 25% 25% 25%
C4 Misallocated investments addressable with Clari C1*C2*C3 $12,640,850 $12,909,200 $13,170,600
C5 Reduction in misallocated funds Interviews 25% 55% 90%
Ct Improved investment allocations using better forecasting accuracy C4*C5 $3,160,213 $7,100,060 $11,853,540
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Ctr Improved investment allocations using better forecasting accuracy (risk-adjusted)   $2,528,170 $5,680,048 $9,482,832
Three-year total: $17,691,050 Three-year present value: $14,117,183
Enhanced Productivity For Managers And Revenue Operations

Evidence and data. According to interviewees, by centralizing data from disparate systems and providing intuitive tools for inspection, scoring, and collaboration, Clari enabled sales managers and revenue operations teams to make faster, more informed decisions. Interviewees described productivity gains for managers and revenue operations teams driven by streamlined forecasting workflows and reduced manual effort:

  • Interviewees explained that before Clari, sales leaders spent hours manually updating forecasts and reconciling data across systems. With Clari, those tasks became real-time and collaborative, allowing managers to focus on strategic coaching and pipeline inspection instead of administrative overhead. The vice president of sales operations in software estimated a 50% improvement in forecasting productivity, particularly in tasks like spreadsheet maintenance, deal status updates, and reporting.

  • The director of global business excellence in manufacturing reported that Clari enabled their team to course-correct decades of inefficient forecasting behavior in just six months. The platform replaced fragmented, anecdotal forecasting with a structured, high-trust process that delivered 96% forecast accuracy for this interviewee’s organization. This transformation not only improved operational efficiency but also elevated the credibility of the sales organization in the eyes of corporate leadership, enabling better alignment and faster decision-making.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • There are 400 sales and customer success managers that spend 160 hours on forecasting activities. With Clari, this is reduced by 15% in Year 1, 25% in Year 2, and 33% in Year 3.

  • There are 200 revenue operations team members that spend 832 hours on forecasting-related administrative tasks, which is reduced by 15% in Year 1, 25% in Year 2, and 33% in Year 3.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for managers and revenue operations team members is $65.

Risks. The impact of this benefit will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The complexity and fragmentation of the organization’s existing forecasting and reporting workflows.

  • The degree of Clari adoption across sales leadership, operations, and supporting teams.

  • The organization’s ability to configure Clari to reflect its business processes and data structures.

  • The baseline level of manual effort and inefficiency prior to Clari implementation.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.8 million.

33%

Reduction in forecasting activities

“We’ve saved 90% of the time spent taking data out of a system to roll up the forecast. Four regional sales leaders were probably spending 4 hours a week each; now, it’s more like one.”

Vice president of sales operations, software

Enhanced Productivity For Managers And Revenue Operations
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Sales and customer success managers using Clari (A1+B1)*10% 400 400 400
D2 Hours spent on forecasting activities Interviews 160 160 160
D3 Reduction in forecasting activities Interviews 15% 25% 33%
D4 Subtotal: Manager hours saved due to Clari D1*D2*D3 9,600 16,000 21,120
D5 Revenue operations team members using Clari Composite 200 200 200
D6 Hours spent on forecasting-related administrative tasks Interviews 832 832 832
D7 Reduction in forecasting admin Interviews 15% 25% 33%
D8 Subtotal: Revenue operations hours saved due to Clari D5*D6*D7 24,960 41,600 54,912
D9 Productivity recapture rate TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
D10 Average fully burdened hourly rate for managers and revenue operations team members Composite $65 $65 $65
Dt Enhanced productivity for managers and revenue operations (D4+D8)*D9*D10 $1,123,200 $1,872,000 $2,471,040
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Dtr Enhanced productivity for managers and revenue operations (risk-adjusted)   $954,720 $1,591,200 $2,100,384
Three-year total: $4,646,304 Three-year present value: $3,761,018
Reduced Administrative Burden For Sales And Customer Success

Evidence and data. Interviewees described significant reductions in administrative burden for sales and customer success teams, enabling more time for strategic engagement and customer-facing activities. Interviewees report that Clari supported this reduction in administrative burden by:

  • Improving coaching and rep-manager communication and coaching. Interviewees noted Clari helped them accomplish this by surfacing opportunity health, pipeline movement, and risk indicators that enabled focused, data-driven conversations.

  • Enhancing process compliance. Interviewees said that Clari embedded forecasting and pipeline workflows into a single intuitive interface that reps and managers used consistently.

  • Supporting better decision-making. At the interviewees’ organizations, Clari centralized visibility across the customer journey and surfaced actionable insights that guided resource allocation and strategic planning.

  • Streamlining CRM data entry and activity tracking. Reps at the interviewees’ organizations could log interactions and update deal status directly within Clari, with real-time sync to Salesforce.

  • Centralizing visibility across the customer journey. Clari enabled sales and customer success teams at the interviewees’ organizations to access complete account histories and pipeline data without toggling between systems.

Interviewees experienced the following:

  • The director of global business excellence in manufacturing estimated a 70% reduction in time spent on manual tasks, such as spreadsheet creation and pipeline tracking. Prior to Clari, these tasks consumed up to 18 hours per week; after Clari, they were nearly eliminated, allowing reps and managers to focus on selling and planning rather than data wrangling.

  • The vice president of sales operations in software reported efficiency gains in rep activity tracking and logging. Clari replaced fragmented workflows and manual reporting at this interviewee’s organization with real-time updates and centralized visibility, enabling their reps to manage pipeline and forecast data directly within the platform. This shift not only saved time but also improved data completeness and reduced user input errors, enhancing the overall quality of sales execution.

  • The global sales operations lead said ease of use was a notable factor, noting, “Clari is so much easier navigating than the opportunity page or the account page in the CRM.” This helped reduce administrative burden for reps and managers.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • There are 3,600 sales and customer success team members that spend 312 hours on administrative tasks.

  • With Clari, they reduce the time spent on admin by 25% in Year 1, 38% in Year 2, and 50% in Year 3.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for sales and customer success team members is $55.

Risks. The impact of this benefit will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The volume and complexity of manual tasks in the prior environment, such as forecasting, CRM updates, and activity tracking.

  • The organization’s baseline process compliance and data hygiene before adopting Clari.

  • The degree of Clari adoption across sales, customer success, and supporting teams.

  • The organization’s ability to configure Clari to align with its workflows and integrate with existing systems like CRM and email platforms.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $22.7 million.

50%

Time saved on admin due to Clari

“One of the nice things about, for instance, Groove is that it’s logging all the activities for [the team]. As long as they’re using the Groove add-on in [their mailbox], the activity then automatically becomes logged when they have the meeting. And so, they don’t spend any time on that.”

Vice president of sales operations, software

Reduced Administrative Burden For Sales And Customer Success
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Sales and customer success individual contributors using Clari (A1+B1)*90% 3,600 3,600 3,600
E2 Hours spent on admin Composite 312 312 312
E3 Time saved on admin due to Clari Interviews 25% 38% 50%
E4 Subtotal: Sales and customer success hours saved due to Clari E1*E2*E3 280,800 426,816 561,600
E5 Productivity recapture rate TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
E6 Average fully burdened hourly burdened rate for sales and customer success team members Composite $55 $55 $55
Et Reduced administrative burden for sales and customer success E4*E5*E6 $7,722,000 $11,737,440 $15,444,000
  Risk adjustment 20%      
Etr Reduced administrative burden for sales and customer success (risk-adjusted)   $6,177,600 $9,389,952 $12,355,200
Three-year total: $27,922,752 Three-year present value: $22,658,936
IT Department And Legacy Environment Savings

Evidence and data. Interviewees whose organizations had legacy environments and complex CRM configurations found that Clari was a lighter lift for IT teams compared to traditional platforms:

  • The director of global business excellence in manufacturing noted Clari required minimal ongoing effort from the IT team and remarked this was a stark contrast to their previous experience with other solutions, which required millions of dollars in setup costs and multiple full-time staff to maintain. The interviewee emphasized that Clari delivered the same functionality with far less overhead. This efficiency was especially valuable given their organization’s legacy environment, which the interviewee described as “immature” and overly customized for hardware rather than software. Clari’s ease of use and minimal configuration demands allowed the interviewee’s team to bypass many of the complexities and limitations of their existing CRM setup, enabling faster deployment and broader adoption across functions. The interviewee noted: “[Our other solution] is a horrible tool, but it’s a system that’s a required evil. So if there’s a solution like Clari that makes it easy to manage the system for your reps, it’s critical.”

  • The vice president of sales operations noted that Clari needed fewer resources to manage user provisioning, module installation, and system updates than what would be required to maintain equivalent functionality in other solutions.

  • The interviewee also emphasized that Clari’s implementation was straightforward and fast. Unlike alternative solutions that often demanded extensive customization and developer resources to support forecasting and reporting, Clari delivered out-of-the-box capabilities that replaced manual reporting and eliminated the need for custom dashboards at the interviewees’ organizations. The senior director of global sales operations in software shared that Clari’s native analytics and forecasting tools allowed their team to retire internal dashboards and avoid building complex reporting layers in other solutions. This not only saved time and labor but also enabled their IT department to focus on higher-value initiatives rather than maintaining legacy infrastructure.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • One IT developer in Year 1 and two IT developers in Years 2 and 3 are reallocated.

  • The fully burdened annual salary for a developer is $135,000.

  • Legacy licensing addressable for decommissioning with Clari is $1 million.

  • Due to Clari adoption, the composite decommissions 50% of legacy tools in Year 1 and 100% in Years 2 and 3.

Risks. The impact of this benefit will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The organization’s prior and existing systems and its integrations with Clari.

  • The organization’s ability to decommission its prior systems with its adoption of Clari.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $2.2 million.

2

IT developers managing previously decommissioned tools

“Other divisions are spending $2 million [with a different solution] every year, and this is all you’re getting out of it. You’ve got four people working on it. We did all the same stuff with Clari for considerably less.”

Director of global business excellence, manufacturing

IT Department And Legacy Environment Savings
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 IT developers managing previously decommissioned tools Composite 1 2 2
F2 Fully burdened annual salary for a developer Composite $135,000 $135,000 $135,000
F3 Subtotal: Reallocated labor costs F1*F2 $135,000 $270,000 $270,000
F4 Legacy licensing addressable for decommissioning with Clari Composite $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
F5 Percentage of tools decommissioned due to Clari adoption Interviews 50% 100% 100%
F6 Subtotal: Vendor costs eliminated F4*F5 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Ft IT department and legacy environment savings F3+F6 $635,000 $1,270,000 $1,270,000
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Ftr IT department and legacy environment savings (risk-adjusted)   $539,750 $1,079,500 $1,079,500
Three-year total: $2,698,750 Three-year present value: $2,193,875
Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Improved visibility and transparency. Interviewees noted that Clari improved visibility across their organizations. The global sales operations lead in the software industry emphasized that Clari “abstracts away a lot of complexity” from multiple CRM instances, enabling a unified view of forecasts and pipeline. Similarly, the vice president of sales operations in software noted that Clari provide clear, real-time data, allowing executives to see pipeline by product and geography instantly. The senior director of sales operations in security described Clari as “a center of gravity for selling broadly,” with visibility that “turned the lights on” for frontline managers

  • Improved collaboration and cross-functional alignment. The vice president of sales operations in the software industry highlighted how marketing and sales were now aligned on pipeline generation forecasts with Clari. The senior director of sales operations in security described how Clari facilitated collaboration between prime sales and renewals teams, legal, customer success, and deal operations, noting that “everyone enters their perspective on the deal” in Clari, which is then used in forecast calls. The director of global business excellence in manufacturing shared that Clari “created linkage to [the] cross-functional leadership team in a very powerful way.”

  • More strategic decision-making. Interviewees described that Clari informed strategic decision-making from identifying underperforming segments to improving forecast accuracy and influencing hiring decisions. With Clari, interviewees modeled hiring needs based on win rates and ASP trends. They leveraged Clari for headcount and territory planning and to justify or delay investments based on forecast strength and pause market expansion when forecasts softened.

  • Improved process discipline. Interviewees noted that Clari drove meaningful behavioral change and enforced a consistent forecasting and operational process across their sales organizations, replacing fragmented, spreadsheet-based workflows with a unified system that drove alignment and accountability. The senior director of sales operation in security highlighted how Clari’s rigid hierarchy model eliminated the “shadow hierarchies” that had emerged in their previous tool. The chief sales officer in energy described how Clari “forces structure” in their organization. This rigidity, though initially seen as a limitation, ultimately enforced alignment and saved time. The interviewee said: “It goes back to the standardization and everyone speaking effectively the same language in the same tool. Having everyone doing the same thing the same way creates a lot of efficiencies, scalability, and repeatability across the business.”

“This is the tool I’ve been looking for. Clari is simple and customizable, but it’s powerful.”

Director of global business excellence, manufacturing

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Clari and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Scalability and expansion readiness with AI. Interviewees noted that they looked forward to leveraging upcoming AI features to supplement their experienced benefits and continue to execute at scale. The director of global business excellence in manufacturing remarked,We’re currently using the ‘generate insights’ function within the Inspect module. It’s incredibly valuable and saving us tremendous time in digesting what’s happening within a given opportunity without having to spend time sorting through emails. It’s also given our team tangible evidence that we don’t need to micro-inspect their emails to understand what’s happening in a given deal.”

  • Modular adoption and feature expansion. The interviewees’ organizations adopted Clari’s modules incrementally. Several added Copilot and Groove after initial Clari deployment and replaced other tools. Interviewees said they expect to see additional benefits in both existing Clari users and across their organizations as adoption expands. The director of global business excellence in manufacturing said, “We expect the benefits to grow over time as we expand our use of Clari.” 

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data as applied to the composite
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Gtr Subscription and professional services $16,632 $7,656,480 $7,656,480 $7,656,480 $22,986,072 $19,057,165
Htr Implementation and ongoing administration $388,700 $77,740 $77,740 $77,740 $621,920 $582,028
Itr User training $2,125,200 $1,381,380 $1,381,380 $0 $4,887,960 $4,522,636
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $2,530,532 $9,115,600 $9,115,600 $7,734,220 $28,495,952 $24,161,829
Subscription And Professional Services

Evidence and data. Across the interviewees’ organizations, Clari’s subscription costs varied depending on the organization’s size and scope of usage. Interviewees said their organizations incurred subscription costs for Clari based on users and modules. Pricing may vary. Contact Clari for additional details.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite incurs $11,550 in Clari technology costs in the initial period followed by $5,317,000 in Years 1, 2, and 3.

  • The composite pays 20% of this for professional services.

Risks. The impact of this cost will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The number of users, modules, and the level of organizational adoption of Clari.

  • The extent of the organization’s professional services consumption and Clari’s pricing.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $19.1 million.

Subscription And Professional Services
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Clari technology Composite $11,550 $5,317,000 $5,317,000 $5,317,000
G2 Clari professional services G1* 20% $2,310 $1,063,400 $1,063,400 $1,063,400
Gt Subscription and professional services G1+G2 $13,860 $6,380,400 $6,380,400 $6,380,400
  Risk adjustment 20%        
Gtr Subscription and professional services (risk-adjusted)   $16,632 $7,656,480 $7,656,480 $7,656,480
Three-year total: $22,986,072 Three-year present value: $19,057,165
Implementation And Ongoing Administration

Evidence and data. Clari’s implementation and ongoing management costs varied across the interviewees’ organizations, but several interviewees described the process as relatively lightweight and efficient. Interviewees reported that implementation required minimal effort from their IT teams and minimal involvement from leadership, which was limited to demo participation. Ongoing management of the platform was also typically minimal at around one FTE, hours for which could be spread across several team members depending on the organization’s size. Interviewees shared that once they invested effort into aligning the tool with organizational needs, adoption improved rapidly.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • Ten team members spend 520 hours on the initial deployment of Clari.

  • Five team members dedicate 208 hours to support ongoing management in Years 1, 2, and 3.

  • The average fully burdened hourly salary for team members involved in implementation and ongoing administration is $65.

Risks. The impact of this cost will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The extent of existing CRM customization required to support Clari’s functionality.

  • The number of internal resources available to support configuration and adoption.

  • The organization’s ability to maintain Clari without external support. While some companies used Clari professional services for reconfiguration or onboarding, others managed the platform entirely in-house.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $582,000.

Implementation And Ongoing Administration
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
H1 Team members supporting Clari platform Interviews 10 5 5 5
H2 Hours of deployment effort Interviews 520      
H3 Hours of ongoing administration Interviews   208 208 208
H4 Average fully burdened hourly salary for a team member involved in implementation and ongoing administration Composite $65 $65 $65 $65
Ht Implementation and ongoing administration H1*H2*H3*H4 $338,000 $67,600 $67,600 $67,600
  Risk adjustment 15%        
Htr Implementation and ongoing administration (risk-adjusted)   $388,700 $77,740 $77,740 $77,740
Three-year total: $621,920 Three-year present value: $582,028
User Training

Evidence and data. Interviewees described the platform as intuitive and easy to adopt. The director of global business excellence in manufacturing noted that users received about an hour of initial training followed by optional open sessions and emphasized that Clari was straightforward enough additional training was rarely needed. Similarly, the global sales operations lead in software described Clari as “ramping rapidly down” compared to other tools in terms of training needs, citing its intuitive UI and widespread familiarity among new hires. The vice president of sales operations in software explained that training was delivered through enablement sessions and office hours, but adoption was primarily driven by top-down expectations and improved configuration. None of the interviewees reported significant ongoing training costs or reliance on external training providers.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • 4,200 users with 30% attrition onboard for 8 hours.

  • Ongoing training for users is 4 hours annually.

  • The average fully burdened hourly rate for team members being onboarded is $55.

Risks. The impact of this cost will vary among organizations based on the following factors:

  • The number of users and their familiarity with Clari.

  • The level of internal enablement and change management required to drive adoption at the organization, including investment in any necessary reconfiguration, training, and executive alignment.

  • The complexity of the organization’s sales processes and Clari configuration. Organizations with customized workflows or multiple sales segments may require more tailored training to ensure consistent usage.

  • The extent to which Clari is integrated into daily workflows.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.5 million.

User Training
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
I1 Sales, customer success, and revenue operations users A1+B1+D5 4,200 4,200 4,200  
I2 Clari users onboarded Initial: Composite
Y1 and Y2: I1*30%
4,200 1,260 1,260  
I3 Onboarding training hours Interviews 8 8 8  
I4 Ongoing training hours Interviews 0 4 4  
I5 Average fully burdened hourly rate for team members being onboarded Composite $55 $55 $55  
It User training ((I1-I2)*I4+I2*I3)*I5 $1,848,000 $1,201,200 $1,201,200 $0
  Risk adjustment 15%        
Itr User training (risk-adjusted)   $2,125,200 $1,381,380 $1,381,380 $0
Three-year total: $4,887,960 Three-year present value: $4,522,636

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($2,530,532) ($9,115,600) ($9,115,600) ($7,734,220) ($28,495,952) ($24,161,829)
Total benefits $0 $21,468,240 $50,476,700 $78,665,916 $150,610,856 $120,335,730
Net benefits ($2,530,532) $12,352,640 $41,361,100 $70,931,696 $122,114,904 $96,173,901
ROI           398%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Clari.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Clari can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed Clari stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Clari.

Interviews

Interviewed six decision-makers at five organizations using Clari to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Composite Organization

Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Clari and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Clari.

Clari reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Clari provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Nahida Nisa

Published

September 2025