Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Atlassian Loom

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Loom

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY ATLASSIAN, March 2026

[CONTENT]
 

Total Economic Impact

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Atlassian Loom

A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY ATLASSIAN, March 2026

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Loom

Forrester Print Hero Background
M
K
[CONTENT]
[CONTENT]

Executive Summary

As organizations continue to navigate an evolving workplace shifting between inoffice, remote, and hybrid models many are finding that traditional, realtime meetings no longer scale. An alwayson meeting culture fragments employee time, increases cognitive load, and makes it harder to focus on meaningful work. For distributed and hybrid teams, these challenges extend beyond productivity, creating friction in onboarding, enablement, and alignment. Teams increasingly need flexible ways to share context, communicate consistently, and connect employees from daytoday collaboration to companywide moments.

Loom, a video communication platform, addresses these inefficiencies by decoupling communication creation and consumption, enabling a shift to asyncfirst workflows. Interview insights and Forrester’s financial modeling indicate that Loom helps organizations reduce redundant communication and improve individual and team productivity by minimizing unnecessary meetings. These benefits also enable organizations to scale onboarding and enhance overall internal and external engagement.

Atlassian commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study to examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Loom.1 The purpose of this study is to provide a framework for evaluating the potential financial impact of Loom on enterprise operations.

232%

Return on investment (ROI)

 

$5.4M

Net present value (NPV)

 

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed a decisionmaker at a global consulting and professional services company with direct experience deploying Loom and used their insights to model a threeyear financial analysis.

The interviewee reported that, prior to adopting Loom, their organization struggled to manage distributed teams effectively, experienced significant meeting overload, and faced the operational burden of delivering global training. Attempts to address these challenges often introduced additional complexity, leading to redundant meetings, lower productivity, and diminished customer engagement.

Following the investment in Loom, the interviewee’s organization shifted how communication and knowledge sharing occurred. By using video communication, its teams cut back on repetitive meetings, communicated more clearly, and trained new hires faster. The interviewee indicated that these changes generated measurable time savings, improved employee engagement, and increased operational efficiency. Additionally, their organization redirected recaptured employee time toward core business priorities, boosting productivity across consulting and professional services teams. The company also improved external communication quality, strengthening customer relationships and engagement.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the interviewee’s organization include:

  • Increased employee productivity from meeting reduction valued at $2.8 million. Loom replaces lowvalue status meetings with async video, enabling a 15% reduction in weekly meeting time for the company’s employees who consume Loom videos.

  • Reduced time to productivity for new hires delivers $759,000 in incremental revenue. Moving from live training to an evergreen video library reduces ramp-up time for new hires by 30% and reduces delivery time for managers, accelerating revenue realization across departments.

  • Enhanced employee engagement and retention saves $1.4 million. Loom company leadership more effectively communicate their vision and strategic direction to employees. Enhanced engagement across the organization results in reduced voluntary turnover and employee replacement costs.

  • Improved customer engagement adds $2.7 million from incremental sales. Sending personalized Loom videos increases ongoing lead engagement from 20% to 28% and close rate from 12% to 15%, improving the sales team’s profit contribution.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified for this study include:

  • Creation of persistent, searchable knowledge assets. The interviewee’s organization captures project updates, training, and technical demonstrations as durable Loom videos with automated transcriptions and summaries. These assets comprise a searchable knowledge base that reduces reliance on individual experts, accelerates onboarding, and limits redundant work.

  • Preservation of decision rationale across the Atlassian platform. The interviewee’s organization uses Loom within Jira and Confluence to add visual and verbal context to technical discussions, enabling teams to review prior reasoning, align on decisions asynchronously, and resolve issues faster without reopening discussions or scheduling additional meetings.

  • Strengthening of connections and alignment throughout a global workforce. Loom enables leaders at the interviewee’s organization to communicate more personally and authentically through video, improving engagement across time zones and maintaining alignment with shared goals through frequent, humancentered updates.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the interviewee’s organization include:

  • Annual subscription fees for Loom. The company licenses Loom through an enterprise subscription, bundled within Atlassian’s Teamwork Collection alongside Jira, Confluence, and Rovo. Pricing is user-based and includes identity and access management (e.g., SSO, SCIM), administrative controls, cloud video hosting, and standard support. Per-seat subscription costs decrease over time as adoption expands across departments. The total three-year subscription cost for the organization is $442,000.

  • Internal enablement and administration costs. The organization incurs internal costs to support Loom adoption, including user onboarding, training, content creation (e.g., video production, curation, tagging), light administration related to group and access management, and new feature exploration. These internal efforts total $1.9 million over three years.

The representative interview and financial analysis found that the company experiences benefits of $7.7 million over three years versus costs of $2.3 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $5.4 million and an ROI of 232%.

“We’re scheduling fewer meetings and calls now. Sharing knowledge asynchronously is often richer and more effective than a live call.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

Key Statistics

232%

Return on investment (ROI) 

$7.7M

Benefits PV 

$5.4M

Net present value (NPV) 

<6 months

Payback 

Benefits (Three-Year)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Increased employee productivity Incremental profit growth Enhanced employee engagement Improved profit due to customer engagement

The Atlassian Loom Customer Journey

Drivers leading to Loom investment
Interviewee’s Organization

Forrester interviewed a decision-maker who has experience using Atlassian Loom at their company, a global consulting and professional services organization.

Key Challenges

As a global enterprise, the interviewee’s company operated within hybrid work environments and globally distributed teams. This dynamic created a core challenge: strengthening culture and collaboration while maintaining efficiency and profitability across regions and time zones.

Prior to implementing Loom, the organization relied on traditional videoconferencing and unified communication tools. Although effective for realtime interactions, these tools could not support asynchronous collaboration at scale. As a result, communication inefficiencies had increased as the workforce became more distributed.

Because employee time and expertise directly drive value in professional services, the interviewee emphasized that these inefficiencies had measurable consequences. Specifically, the company struggled with the following challenges:

  • Meeting fatigue. Managers and individual contributors spent 3 to 4 hours per week in repetitive, synchronous meetings, many of which consisted of low-value status updates.

  • Information silos. Employees captured knowledge in ephemeral, live meetings, requiring additional meetings or manual recaps for those who could not attend. This limited information flow and slowed organizational response to changing customer needs.

  • Ineffective textbased communication. Increased reliance on email and chat reduced meeting volume but proved insufficient for complex explanations, leading to misinterpretation and additional meetings.

  • Sales and support inefficiencies. Sales outreach and customer communication relied heavily on generic, textbased communication resulting in low response rates. Resolving detailed sales inquiries and customer issues often required extended email threads or scheduled calls, lengthening sales cycles and resolution times.

Solution Requirements

The consulting and professional services organization sought a solution that could:

  • Reduce reliance on synchronous meetings without sacrificing collaboration or human connection.

  • Enhance and personalize communication beyond what text-based tools could provide.

  • Create persistent knowledge assets from everyday communications.

  • Accelerate time to productivity for new hires through scalable, consistent onboarding and training.

  • Differentiate sales engagement in a crowded and competitive market.

“Instead of coordinating large groups ahead of time, we use Loom to walk customers through prepared material before a session. That makes live conversations more focused and more valuable.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

Use Case Description

The organization supplements its existing videoconferencing, telephony, and collaboration tools with Loom for simple, immediate video creation. Its employees can begin creating and consuming content with minimal training, leverage Loom’s AI features, and integrate its output with their current Atlassian tools.

The company deploys Loom to 25% of its consulting and professional services employees and customer-facing teams in Year 1, expands to an additional 25% in Year 2, and reaches the remaining 50% in Year 3. Although all licensed users have full access through an enterprise deployment, most users primarily consume Loom content by viewing recorded videos from team leads and those in customer-facing roles. It measures adoption by the number of licensed users and the volume of videos created and consumed.

Analysis Of Benefits

Quantified benefit data
Total Benefits
Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Increased employee productivity $405,405 $958,230 $2,211,300 $3,574,935 $2,821,858
Btr Incremental profit growth $136,304 $272,609 $545,219 $954,133 $758,841
Ctr Enhanced employee engagement $247,518 $495,037 $990,073 $1,732,628 $1,377,994
Dtr Improved profit due to customer engagement $888,510 $1,122,561 $1,345,521 $3,356,591 $2,746,382
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $1,677,737 $2,848,437 $5,092,113 $9,618,287 $7,705,075
Increased Employee Productivity

Evidence and data. The interviewee reported that, before Loom, employees at their organization spent a substantial amount of time in internal, nonbillable meetings for routine status updates, project coordination, and feedback cycles that did not require realtime interaction. These meetings were often inefficient and diverted employee time away from highervalue work. With Loom, the interviewee’s company was able to:

  • Replace live meetings with video communication. Following deployment, the interviewee’s organization used video communication to replace a portion of its synchronous meetings. The interviewee indicated that shifting routine updates and feedback to recorded video reduced the volume of live meetings and reclaimed employee labor hours that had previously been lost to meeting inefficiencies.

  • Reduce repeat interactions with reusable content. The interviewee also noted that Loom enabled the creation of durable, reusable knowledge assets that employees could access on demand. Recorded content reduced the need for repeat meetings and follow-up discussions, improving meeting efficiency and overall productivity.

  • Establish asynchronous collaboration across teams and time zones. In addition, the interviewee observed that Loom improved the effectiveness of their organization’s communication model by supporting asynchronous collaboration across schedules and time zones. Because content could be consumed at any time, employees were less constrained by availability, further reducing reliance on scheduled meetings.

  • Create flexibility for mobile and remote employees. Finally, the interviewee stated that Loom supported productivity by enabling employees to share updates and feedback from any device and location. This flexibility reduced email volume and minimized dependence on formal, live meetings, particularly for remote and traveling employees.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester makes the following assumptions about the organization:

  • Twentyfive percent of the consulting and professional services division’s 4,000 employees are licensed users in Year 1, increasing to 100% by Year 3.

  • Fiftyfive percent of licensed users consume Loom content in Year 1, growing to 65% in Year 2 and 75% in Year 3.

  • Employees who consume Loom content spend an average of 3 hours per week in meetings.

  • Loom enables a 15% reduction in meeting time on average for employees who consume content.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for these employees is $70.

  • Forrester applies a 50% recapture rate, reflecting that not all time savings are redeployed to valueadded work.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors could affect the level of benefit realized:

  • Adoption may vary across teams and roles, limiting the extent to which organizations can replace meetings.

  • Employees and teams may adopt asynchronous communication practices at different rates.

  • Cultural preferences for inperson discussion may slow the transition to asyncfirst workflows.

  • Managers may increase the use of synchronous meetings during critical periods (e.g., product launches), reducing time savings.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted the benefit downward by 10%, resulting in a threeyear, riskadjusted total present value (discounted at 10%) of $2.8 million.

27 minutes

Meeting time saved per Loom user per week

“Instead of a 30-minute meeting, I can send a 5-minute Loom. It saves me scheduling time across time zones and cuts filler conversation. Cycle time drops as well, since knowledge is shared immediately.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

Increased Employee Productivity
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Employees with Loom licenses Interview 1,000 2,000 4,000
A2 Percentage of licensed employees consuming Loom videos Interview 55% 65% 75%
A3 Average time spent in meetings per week (hours) Company 3.0 3.0 3.0
A4 Percentage of reduced in-person and redundant meetings Company 15% 15% 15%
A5 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee Company $70 $70 $70
A6 Productivity recapture rate Company 50% 50% 50%
At Increased employee productivity A1*A2*A3*A4*A5*A6*52 $450,450 $1,064,700 $2,457,000
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Atr Increased employee productivity (risk-adjusted)   $405,405 $958,230 $2,211,300
Three-year total: $3,574,935 Three-year present value: $2,821,858
Incremental Profit Growth From Faster New Hire Onboarding

Evidence and data. The interviewee reported that their organization used alternative video tools with limited functionality before Loom, which increased administrative effort for trainers and constrained global scale. Live, instructor-led training was costly and difficult to standardize, requiring senior managers to divert time from revenue-generating activities. In addition, they cited a shadowing bottleneck in onboarding before Loom; new hires waited for senior staff to demonstrate processes, which extended ramp time, while experienced employees were pulled from core work to train peers. This dynamic increased onboarding costs and delayed productivity realization. Loom enabled the interviewee’s organization to:

  • Reduce live trainings. The business agility manager at the consulting company said: “It takes seconds to turn a recorded walkthrough into a document or a work item. That speed wasn’t possible when everything depended on live sessions.”

  • Accelerate time to productivity with asynchronous training. Postimplementation, their organization used video communication to support onboarding and training. Loom enabled on-demand modules and “evergreen” libraries covering methodologies, software tools, policies, and role-specific processes. The organization reduced repeated live sessions, shortened time to productivity for new hires, and decreased time spent by senior employees on redundant training. The business agility manager indicated that earlier productivity realization was the primary driver of economic value, stating: “The time we save on enablement goes straight back into client priorities. People get back to highervalue work instead of sitting through repeat explanations.”

Modeling and assumptions. This benefit reflects accelerated time to productivity for new hires and time savings for senior employees involved in onboarding and training activities. Forrester makes the following assumptions:

  • The organization experiences an average annual employee turnover rate of 12%. Based on this rate, it makes 120 new hires in Year 1, 240 in Year 2, and 480 in Year 3.

  • Senior employees delivering onboarding training represent one-third of new hires, equivalent to 40 trainers in Year 1, increasing to 80 by Year 3.

  • Before deploying Loom, each new hire required an average of 120 hours of live, instructorled training.

  • Following implementation, the organization reduces live training time by 30%, or 36 hours per new hire, by replacing a portion of inperson sessions with recorded Loom modules, while trainers reclaim a comparable amount of time previously spent on repeated live enablement.

  • The average hourly revenue contribution per employee is $192.

  • The organization operates with an average net operating margin of 14.5%, which is applied to incremental revenue gains to determine operating profit impact.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that benefit realization may vary across organizations. The following risks could reduce the magnitude of the shortened timetoproductivity benefit:

  • Content freshness requires periodic updates to maintain accuracy and relevance.

  • Role complexity may vary by department, affecting ramptime reduction.

  • Engagement with selfpaced asynchronous content may vary by new hire.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applies a risk adjustment of 15% to this benefit. After adjustment, the shortened timetoproductivity benefit yields a threeyear, riskadjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $759,000.

36 hours

Reduction in onboarding time per new hire

“Before Loom, turning a live training into usable material could take 2 to 4 hours. Now, I record and share immediately. Even with light edits, it’s ready in less than 30 minutes.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

Incremental Profit Growth
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 New employee hires A1*C2 120 240 480
B2 Trainers B1/3 40 80 160
B3 Time spent in live meetings during new hire ramp-up (hours) Company 120 120 120
B4 Time to productivity improvement with Loom Interview 30% 30% 30%
B5 Time saved per trainer and new hire (hours) B3*B4 36 36 36
B6 Average revenue contribution per employee per hour Company $192 $192 $192
B7 Net operating margin Company 14.5% 14.5% 14.5%
Bt Incremental profit growth (B1+B2)*B5*B6*B7 $160,358 $320,717 $641,434
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Btr Incremental profit growth (risk-adjusted)   $136,304 $272,609 $545,219
Three-year total: $954,133 Three-year present value: $758,841
Enhanced Employee Engagement

Evidence and data. The interviewee indicated that employee engagement and retention were ongoing challenges in the consulting and professional services industry, where frequent travel, sustained workloads, and high meeting volumes contributed to burnout and fatigue. They noted that excessive synchronous meetings, particularly for routine updates and coordination, increased cognitive load and could lead to disengagement over time. Loom addressed these challenges at their organization by:

  • Enabling flexibility and workload control through asynchronous communication. Following implementation, the consulting and professional services organization used Loom to reduce unnecessary live meetings by shifting updates, feedback, and recognition to video communication. The interviewee reported that this flexibility reduced meeting pressure, enabled employees to better manage their schedules, and supported healthier worklife balance. By allowing employees to consume and respond to information on their own time, Loom reduced backtoback meeting strain and time zone constraints.

  • Facilitating more personal and authentic internal communication. The interviewee also stated that Loom improved the quality of internal communication at their organization. Managers used recorded video to recognize employee contributions, share updates, and communicate context in a more personal manner than textbased tools. They emphasized that video messages conveyed tone and intent more effectively than chat or email, helping maintain connection and a sense of belonging across distributed teams.

  • Leveraging engagement as a contributing factor to retention. Although the interviewee did not attribute retention improvements to Loom alone, they consistently identified improved engagement, flexibility, and communication quality as contributing to employee satisfaction. They indicated that even modest reductions in voluntary attrition could generate meaningful economic impact given the high cost of employee turnover.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:

  • The cost to replace an employee is estimated conservatively at one-third of an employee’s annual salary, comprising recruiting fees, onboarding, training, severance, and lost productivity.

  • Before Loom, the organization experienced 12% annual voluntary turnover, resulting in approximately 120 departures per year.

  • Forrester assumes that improvements in employee engagement and worklife balance supported by Loom reduce the voluntary turnover rate to 11.4%.

  • This reduction results in approximately six avoided resignations per year in Year 1, increasing as adoption grows in subsequent years.

  • Avoided resignations multiplied by the estimated cost per departure quantify the annual savings.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that benefit realization may vary across organizations. The following risks could reduce the magnitude of the employee engagement benefit:

  • Impact may vary by role, geography, and work model (e.g., fieldbased versus officebased employees).

  • Broader labormarket conditions may influence voluntary turnover independently of internal collaboration tools.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applies a 15% risk adjustment to this benefit. After adjustment, the enhanced employee engagement benefit yields a threeyear riskadjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $1.4 million.

5%

Reduction in employee turnover driven by higher engagement

“Loom removes anxiety for me. I don’t have to stress about taking notes; I can be present in the moment and rely on the transcript and recap.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

Enhanced Employee Engagement
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Average cost to replace an employee A5*2,080/3 $48,533 $48,533 $48,533
C2 Employee turnover rate before Loom Interview 12.0% 12.0% 12.0%
C3 Employee turnover rate after Loom C2-(C2*0.05) 11.4% 11.4% 11.4%
C4 Employees retained A1*(C2-C3) 6 12 24
Ct Enhanced employee engagement C1*C4 $291,198 $582,396 $1,164,792
  Risk adjustment 15%      
Ctr Enhanced employee engagement (risk-adjusted)   $247,518 $495,037 $990,073
Three-year total: $1,732,628 Three-year present value: $1,377,994
Improved Profit Due To Customer Engagement

Evidence and data. Before Loom, sales outreach and proposals relied primarily on textbased communication, which the interviewee indicated was often ignored in crowded inboxes and resulted in limited ongoing engagement. By sending Loom videos, account managers could engage far more customers, improve response rates, and move sales conversations forward more swiftly. Specifically, Loom enabled:

  • Personalized video that increased prospect attention and response. Following implementation, the interviewee’s company incorporated Loom videos into prospecting, followups, and proposal communications. Short, personalized video messages increased prospect attention and response rates by conveying relevance, intent, and context more clearly than text alone. Loom video thumbnails embedded in outreach emails prompted higher initial engagement, while proposal walkthroughs helped prospects better understand value propositions and next steps. The interviewee mentioned how their account managers used Loom to share information with customers instead of setting up demos. They sent 30second or oneminute Loom video tailored to customers and then picked up the conversations from there.

  • Sustained engagement that accelerated sales progression. The interviewee noted that Loom reduced the number of interactions required to close a sales transaction. Before Loom, account executives often needed multiple touchpoints to maintain prospect engagement and advance opportunities. With Loom, ongoing engagement improved, enabling prospects to remain active in the pipeline and progress through the sales funnel more efficiently.

  • Human connection that supported pipeline momentum. The interviewee emphasized that creating a Loom video signaled effort and intention, establishing a more human connection early in the relationship. This increased reciprocity and sustained engagement throughout the evaluation process. Although the interviewee acknowledged that many factors influenced sales outcomes, they consistently attributed improved prospect or customer responsiveness and pipeline momentum in part to Loomenabled personalization.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:

  • Forty account executives use Loom in Year 1. The number of account executives using Loom increases to 50 in Year 2 and 60 in Year 3.

  • Before Loom, each account executive engaged an average of 28 leads per quarter.

  • Twenty percent of leads remain active in the pipeline without Loom.

  • Twelve percent of active leads convert to closed sales, with an average transaction value of $85,000.

  • Outreach and proposals accompanied by Loom videos achieve a 28% ongoing engagement rate.

  • The close rate for active leads increases to 15% following Loom adoption.

  • The company’s net operating margin is 14.5%.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:

  • Sales performance is influenced by market conditions, productmarket fit, pricing, and individual seller effectiveness.

  • The quality of personalization and relevance of video messaging can affect engagement and conversion results.

  • The average number of interactions required to close a deal may fluctuate across customer segments and deal sizes.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applies a 10% risk adjustment to this benefit. After adjustment, the improved customer engagement benefit yields a threeyear, riskadjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $2.7 million.

40%

Increase in sales lead engagement

25%

Increase in opportunity close rate

“For deeper technical or product detail, we’ll package Loom videos with supporting content and share them with customers so they can engage at their own pace.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

Improved Profit Due To Customer Engagement
Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Account executives using Loom Interview 40 50 60
D2 Warm leads contact volume per quarter Interview 28 28 28
D3 Total warm leads D1*D2*4 4,480 5,600 6,720
D4 Ongoing lead engagement rate before Loom Interview 20% 20% 20%
D5 Warm leads that remain engaged before Loom D3*D4 896 1,120 1,344
D6 Close rate before Loom Interview 12% 12% 12%
D7 Sales closed before Loom D5*D6 108 134 161
D8 Average revenue per sale Interview $85,000 $85,000 $85,000
D9 Total sales revenue before Loom D7*D8 $9,180,000 $11,390,000 $13,685,000
D10 Ongoing lead engagement rate after Loom Interview 28% 28% 28%
D11 Warm leads that remain engaged after Loom D3*D10 1,254 1,568 1,882
D12 Close rate after Loom Interview 15% 15% 15%
D13 Total sales revenue after Loom D8*D11*D12 $15,988,500 $19,992,000 $23,995,500
D14 Incremental benefit after Loom D13-D9 $6,808,500 $8,602,000 $10,310,500
D15 Net operating margin B7 14.5% 14.5% 14.5%
Dt Improved profit due to customer engagement D14*D15 $987,233 $1,247,290 $1,495,023
  Risk adjustment 10%      
Dtr Improved profit due to customer engagement (risk-adjusted)   $888,510 $1,122,561 $1,345,521
Three-year total: $3,356,591 Three-year present value: $2,746,382

 Interview Spotlight

A CEO’s Perspective

The CEO of an IT services organization offered qualitative insights into their experience with Loom to enrich this study. Although these insights did not inform the financial model, they provided another perspective on the platform.

The CEO echoed Loom’s benefits as noted by the business agility manager. Specifically:

  • Improved employee productivity and reduced time lost to synchronous communication. The interviewee noted that Loom’s asynchronous communication model reduced unnecessary interruptions, allowing employees to communicate more efficiently and with less friction throughout the workday: “Asynchronous communication reduces stress and unease. I can share updates clearly without interrupting people’s day, and they can consume it when it works for them.” One example for added productivity was how engineers recorded Loom responses outlining multiple solution options and their reasoning. Other team members could later review those recordings, align on the decision, and move forward without scheduling additional meetings. The executive explained: “An engineer responded with a Loom outlining options A, B, and C and his reasoning, and when the same questions came up later, I would direct others to watch that Loom and align — without having to reopen the entire discussion.”

  • Time savings for executives through reduced meeting load. The interviewee noted that Loom helped senior leaders avoid scheduling bottlenecks by enabling effective communication without live meetings, contributing to measurable executive time savings: “One of the challenges of being a CEO today is scheduling. Loom gives me the freedom to communicate effectively without imposing on people. It reduces anxiety and saves time compared to traditional meetings.”

  • Reduced onboarding and training time for new hires. According to the interviewee, Loom replaced timeintensive documentation and live training with short, reusable videos, enabling faster rampup and more effective knowledge transfer for new account managers: “New account managers use Loom for upskilling. Instead of lengthy playbooks, they watch short videos, saving hours and improving learning speed.”

  • Faster sales cycles and higher conversion rates. This CEO explained that Loom directly accelerated buyer engagement and deal velocity by making followup more personal and easier to share across stakeholder groups: “We go from a marketing conversation to sending a personalized Loom followup, and those get forwarded many times internally at the customer, leading to faster engagement and conversions.”

Unquantified Benefits

The business agility manager identified the following additional benefits that provided value to their company but were not quantified in the financial model:

  • Recorded video created persistent, searchable knowledge across the company. The interviewee described Loom as defaulton, persistent, and queryable — with transcription, summaries, and reuse replacing reliance on individuals and oneoff meetings. Loom videos created for project updates, training, and technical demonstrations became durable, reusable assets. With automated transcription and AIgenerated summaries, this content formed a searchable knowledge repository that reduced dependency on individual experts, accelerated onboarding, and limited redundant work. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services firm explained: “By default, Loom puts the knowledge in a trustable, secure and persistent space. … It’s capturing the knowledge by default and then we can choose what to do with it afterward, leveraging its intelligent-bytranscription summarization and bookmarking capability.”

  • Visual communication preserved context across the Atlassian platform. For complex or technical topics, the interviewee reported that textbased communication was often insufficient. By adding visual context and vocal tone, Loom improved clarity in scenarios such as Jira bug reports, code reviews, and design feedback. This clarity reduced ambiguity, minimized rework, and shortened issueresolution cycles — particularly for technical teams working across time zones.

  • Loom strengthened culture by making leadership communication more personal. In a globally distributed organization, video communication enabled leaders to communicate in a more personal and engaging manner across time zones. The interviewees noted that leadership messages delivered via Loom felt more authentic than mass email communications and supported a sense of connection across the workforce.

“We’ve started a series of interviewing each other on Loom to capture insights. … It goes into the teamwork graph, and then we can use the other Atlassian tools to query it and use that as data input for creating things.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

“With Loom, we can create a persistent, searchable knowledge base. [Our current live meeting tool] tends to be very temporal. … That knowledge is lost quite quickly rather than it being something that adds to your core pool of knowledge. Whereas with Loom … you’re adding to the hive mind as soon as you start using it.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

 AI Spotlight

How Loom’s AI Enhances Efficiency Across Everyday Workflows

The interviewee shared how Loom’s AI capabilities enhanced everyday communication workflows by streamlining content creation, consumption, and knowledge sharing. This included:

  • AIpowered video optimization and editing. The interviewee reported that Loom’s AI removed filler words, pauses, and unnecessary content automatically, producing shorter, clearer videos without manual editing or rerecording. This reduced the effort required to create shareable content and helped teams communicate more efficiently at scale.

  • AI transcription, summarization, and navigation. Loom’s AIgenerated transcripts enabled users to search, skim, and jump directly to relevant sections of videos, allowing employees to consume only the information they needed rather than watching full recordings. The interviewee described this as a meaningful time saver compared to traditional meeting recordings.

  • AI notetaking and persistent knowledge capture. The interviewee highlighted AI notetaking and transcription as a way to capture meeting knowledge by default in a secure, persistent format, reducing the risk of information loss. This allowed teams to revisit decisions and context without relying on manual notes or memory.

  • AI support for accessibility and neurodiversity. AI features such as transcripts, summaries, and flexible consumption formats helped employees with different learning styles and accessibility needs engage with content more effectively. The interviewee noted that this reduced cognitive load and anxiety, particularly for neurodiverse employees, while improving information retention.

  • AIenabled training and enablement efficiency. The interviewee reported that AI significantly reduced the time required to create and distribute training materials by making recorded sessions immediately usable without extensive postproduction. As a result, teams were able to create more enablement content that would otherwise not have been produced.

  • AIassisted personalization and content reuse. The interviewee referenced AI capabilities that supported light personalization and video content reuse, allowing their teams to tailor messages or demos for different audiences without starting from scratch. This helped extend the value of existing content while maintaining efficiency.

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Loom and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Expansion of AIenabled documentation workflows. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services organization mentioned that as Loom’s AI capabilities mature, their teams will further leverage recorded video to generate structured documentation (e.g., operating procedures, project briefs, clientready status updates) through transcriptbased editing and automated summaries. This could reduce manual documentation effort and increase existing content reuse. The business agility manager said: “Rather than decomposing that training into a script and spending 2 to 4 hours writing it up, now it’s captured and shared. Even if I need to edit it, it will be less than half an hour to get a video and a few bullet points out.”

  • Extension to clientfacing use cases. The interviewee intends to expand the use of Loom to support additional external use cases in sales enablement and customer success, such as solution walkthroughs embedded within proposals or customer onboarding portals. Using Loom more often in customerfacing work could help teams engage clients better and rely less on live handoffs. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services organization mentioned how their teams intend to enhance communication with existing customers: “We’ll provide Loom videos to clients after a call and say, ‘For those of you that want to go deeper, here are three Loom videos,’ often together with Confluence content.”

  • Evolution of asynchronous workflows. Over time, the interviewee said their organization may identify additional opportunities to replace recurring synchronous interactions with video communication as teams become more comfortable with asyncfirst communication patterns. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services firm said: “Instead of five town halls to tell people the same update, I expect those teams will prepare one Loom and share it async. I expect that we will also share way more piecemeal, small updates as and when they come up instead of scheduling meetings. That will be a big save.”

“We can provide Loom records of the meeting to the client. Loom is way better at keeping links, chat, and context together so they can consume it later.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

 Platform Spotlight

Loom As Part Of The Atlassian Teamwork Collection Platform

The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services organization described how it is using Loom as part of the Atlassian Teamwork Collection bundle, alongside Jira, Confluence, and Rovo, to turn conversations into structured, reusable work. They highlighted how Loom helped reduce tool sprawl as part of the broader bundle, enabling asynchronous collaboration at scale and accelerating the flow from insight to action. Rather than adding another point solution, Loom amplified the value of Jira and Confluence by serving as the communication layer that connects knowledge, work management, and AIdriven reuse.

The business agility manager revealed the following advantages their organization derived from using Loom as part of the Atlassian Teamwork Collection bundle:

  • Loom is embedded in the Atlassian system of work. “The Atlassian tools are just the way they work. The job isn’t implementing Jira or implementing Loom — we’re using it as a core part of how we work. You’re basically implementing one system — work management, knowledge, and rich communication together — rather than segregated tools.”

  • Loom acts as an entry point into the Teamwork Collection platform. “Loom is the start of a journey. You create content and it flows into the other tools. It’s really the entry gateway to the Teamwork Collection suite. It’s the easy one where people go, ‘Oh yeah, I can capture my meeting,’ and then that feeds into Confluence and Jira with Rovo.”

  • Loom turns video into structured knowledge and work. “We can finish a meeting and almost immediately turn it into a document and then turn that into Jira tickets and a work plan for the team. In another scenario, I bring a Loom recording into a Confluence page and then use Rovo to transform it from a record of training into an organizational guide in about 30 seconds.”

  • Loom connects conversations directly to Jira work items. “We include Loom links directly inside work items in Jira. That works from very tactical execution all the way up to strategic goals. Rather than adding everyone to meetings, people can watch the Loom, comment, and then take action in Jira.”

Analysis Of Costs

Quantified cost data
Total Costs
Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Etr Fees to Atlassian $0 $91,300 $162,800 $299,200 $553,300 $442,339
Ftr Total internal costs $67,375 $274,582 $622,738 $1,395,625 $2,360,320 $1,880,208
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $67,375 $365,882 $785,538 $1,694,825 $2,913,620 $2,322,547
Fees To Atlassian

Evidence and data. The company licensed Loom through Atlassian’s enterprise ecosystem using userbased subscriptions, bundled within the Atlassian Teamwork Collection suite alongside Jira, Confluence, and Rovo. Atlassian offers Loom as a standalone product and part of bundled offerings; pricing therefore varies by contract and procurement structure.

This TEI analysis isolates the costs and benefits directly attributable to Loom and does not include value from other components of the Teamwork Collection. For the purposes of this study, peruser fees are based on Loom being licensed within the Teamwork Collection bundle, with a defined portion of the bundle cost allocated specifically to Loom; contact Atlassian for additional details.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following:

  • The company adopts sliding scale per-userbased enterprise subscriptions, with annual prices starting at $83 per user for 1,000 seats in Year 1, $74 per user for 2,000 seats in Year 2, and $68 per user for 4,000 seats in Year 3.

  • Base subscription fees and standard enterprise support are included in licensing costs. No premium customization or professional services are required to realize the modeled benefits.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that actual costs may vary. The following risks could affect cost outcomes:

  • Adoption rates may vary across departments, potentially exceeding initial projections and increasing the number of licensed users.

  • Procurement timing and contract structure (e.g., annual renewals versus multiyear prepayment) may affect discount levels and cashflow timing.

  • The adoption of optional features, such as advanced AI capabilities, could increase peruser pricing if selected.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applied a 10% upward risk adjustment to subscription costs. After adjustment, Loom licensing fees represent a threeyear, riskadjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $442,000.

“As an admin, it was simple; I checked that public links were off, and that was most of the setup.”

Business agility manager, consulting and professional services

Fees To Atlassian
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Loom users Interview   1,000 2,000 4,000
E2 Annual Loom license per user Atlassian   $83 $74 $68
Et Fees to Atlassian E1*E2   $83,000 $148,000 $272,000
  Risk adjustment 10%        
Etr Fees to Atlassian (risk-adjusted)   $0 $91,300 $162,800 $299,200
Three-year total: $553,300 Three-year present value: $442,339
Total Internal Costs

Evidence and data. Internal costs reflect the time required to support Loom adoption and ongoing use across the organization. The interviewee reported costs associated with enablement activities led by managers and team leaders, including the creation of recurring briefings and training content, development and periodic refresh of training libraries, time invested in creating Loom videos, light administration to manage groups and access, and change management efforts during departmental rollouts.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:

  • Employees complete an average of 1.75 hours of selfguided training and feature exploration over time.

  • The fully burdened hourly rate for these employees is $70.

  • Managers and team leaders serve as the primary Loom content creators, representing onefourth of licensed users.

  • The average Loom video requires approximately 15 minutes to create and send.

  • Content creators send on average 1.5 Loom videos per week.

  • Based on time investment and labor rates, the average cost per Loom video is $17.50.

Risks. Forrester recognizes that actual costs may vary. The following risks could affect cost outcomes:

  • Cultural resistance to new communication practices may require additional coaching or changemanagement support.

  • Training and knowledge content may require periodic refresh and curation to remain accurate and relevant.

  • Departmentspecific requirements (e.g., compliancedriven documentation in HR or legal teams) could introduce incremental process effort.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.9 million.

Total Internal Costs
Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 New Loom users Interview 500 500 1,000 2,000
F2 Average self-guided training and exploration time per Loom user (hours) Interview 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
F3 Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee Company $70 $70 $70 $70
F4 Subtotal: Loom training and exploration F1*F2*F3 $61,250 $61,250 $122,500 $245,000
F5 Users creating Loom videos E1/4*A2   138 325 750
F6 Average Loom video creation time (minutes) Interview   15 15 15
F7 Loom videos created per year F5*1.5*52   10,764 25,350 58,500
F8 Cost per Loom video created F3*F6/60   $17.50 $17.50 $17.50
F9 Subtotal: Total cost of creating Loom videos F7*F8   $188,370 $443,625 $1,023,750
Ft Total internal costs F4+F9 $61,250 $249,620 $566,125 $1,268,750
  Risk adjustment ↑10%        
Ftr Total internal costs (risk-adjusted)   $67,375 $274,582 $622,738 $1,395,625
Three-year total: $2,360,320 Three-year present value: $1,880,208

Financial Summary

Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
  Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($67,375) ($365,882) ($785,538) ($1,694,825) ($2,913,620) ($2,322,547)
Total benefits $0 $1,677,737 $2,848,437 $5,092,113 $9,618,287 $7,705,075
Net benefits ($67,375) $1,311,855 $2,062,900 $3,397,288 $6,704,668 $5,382,528
ROI           232%
Payback           <6 months

 Please Note

The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

From the information provided in the interview, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Loom.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Loom can have on an organization.

Due Diligence

Interviewed two stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Loom.

Interview

Interviewed one decision-maker with experience using Loom at their organization to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

Financial Model Framework

Constructed a financial model representative of the interview using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewee.

Case Study

Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits

Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

Costs

Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

Flexibility

Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

Risks

Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)

The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

Net present value (NPV)

The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

Return on investment (ROI)

A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

Discount rate

The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

Payback

The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

Appendix A

Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Appendix B

Endnotes

1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Atlassian and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Loom.

Atlassian reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Atlassian provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

TEI Consultant:

Casey Quillin

Published

March 2026

The Total Economic Impact™ Of Atlassian Loom