As organizations continue to navigate an evolving workplace — shifting between in‑office, remote, and hybrid models — many are finding that traditional, real‑time meetings no longer scale. An always‑on meeting culture fragments employee time, increases cognitive load, and makes it harder to focus on meaningful work. For distributed and hybrid teams, these challenges extend beyond productivity, creating friction in onboarding, enablement, and alignment. Teams increasingly need flexible ways to share context, communicate consistently, and connect employees — from day‑to‑day collaboration to companywide moments.
Loom, a video communication platform, addresses these inefficiencies by decoupling communication creation and consumption, enabling a shift to async‑first workflows. Interview insights and Forrester’s financial modeling indicate that Loom helps organizations reduce redundant communication and improve individual and team productivity by minimizing unnecessary meetings. These benefits also enable organizations to scale onboarding and enhance overall internal and external engagement.
Atlassian commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study to examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Loom.1 The purpose of this study is to provide a framework for evaluating the potential financial impact of Loom on enterprise operations.
232%
Return on investment (ROI)
$5.4M
Net present value (NPV)
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed a decision‑maker at a global consulting and professional services company with direct experience deploying Loom and used their insights to model a three‑year financial analysis.
The interviewee reported that, prior to adopting Loom, their organization struggled to manage distributed teams effectively, experienced significant meeting overload, and faced the operational burden of delivering global training. Attempts to address these challenges often introduced additional complexity, leading to redundant meetings, lower productivity, and diminished customer engagement.
Following the investment in Loom, the interviewee’s organization shifted how communication and knowledge sharing occurred. By using video communication, its teams cut back on repetitive meetings, communicated more clearly, and trained new hires faster. The interviewee indicated that these changes generated measurable time savings, improved employee engagement, and increased operational efficiency. Additionally, their organization redirected recaptured employee time toward core business priorities, boosting productivity across consulting and professional services teams. The company also improved external communication quality, strengthening customer relationships and engagement.
Key Findings
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the interviewee’s organization include:
Increased employee productivity from meeting reduction valued at $2.8 million. Loom replaces low‑value status meetings with async video, enabling a 15% reduction in weekly meeting time for the company’s employees who consume Loom videos.
Reduced time to productivity for new hires delivers $759,000 in incremental revenue. Moving from live training to an evergreen video library reduces ramp-up time for new hires by 30% and reduces delivery time for managers, accelerating revenue realization across departments.
Enhanced employee engagement and retention saves $1.4 million. Loom company leadership more effectively communicate their vision and strategic direction to employees. Enhanced engagement across the organization results in reduced voluntary turnover and employee replacement costs.
Improved customer engagement adds $2.7 million from incremental sales. Sending personalized Loom videos increases ongoing lead engagement from 20% to 28% and close rate from 12% to 15%, improving the sales team’s profit contribution.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that are not quantified for this study include:
Creation of persistent, searchable knowledge assets. The interviewee’s organization captures project updates, training, and technical demonstrations as durable Loom videos with automated transcriptions and summaries. These assets comprise a searchable knowledge base that reduces reliance on individual experts, accelerates onboarding, and limits redundant work.
Preservation of decision rationale across the Atlassian platform. The interviewee’s organization uses Loom within Jira and Confluence to add visual and verbal context to technical discussions, enabling teams to review prior reasoning, align on decisions asynchronously, and resolve issues faster without reopening discussions or scheduling additional meetings.
Strengthening of connections and alignment throughout a global workforce. Loom enables leaders at the interviewee’s organization to communicate more personally and authentically through video, improving engagement across time zones and maintaining alignment with shared goals through frequent, human‑centered updates.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the interviewee’s organization include:
Annual subscription fees for Loom. The company licenses Loom through an enterprise subscription, bundled within Atlassian’s Teamwork Collection alongside Jira, Confluence, and Rovo. Pricing is user-based and includes identity and access management (e.g., SSO, SCIM), administrative controls, cloud video hosting, and standard support. Per-seat subscription costs decrease over time as adoption expands across departments. The total three-year subscription cost for the organization is $442,000.
Internal enablement and administration costs. The organization incurs internal costs to support Loom adoption, including user onboarding, training, content creation (e.g., video production, curation, tagging), light administration related to group and access management, and new feature exploration. These internal efforts total $1.9 million over three years.
The representative interview and financial analysis found that the company experiences benefits of $7.7 million over three years versus costs of $2.3 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $5.4 million and an ROI of 232%.
“We’re scheduling fewer meetings and calls now. Sharing knowledge asynchronously is often richer and more effective than a live call.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Key Statistics
232%
Return on investment (ROI)
$7.7M
Benefits PV
$5.4M
Net present value (NPV)
<6 months
Payback
Benefits (Three-Year)
[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Increased employee productivityIncremental profit growthEnhanced employee engagementImproved profit due to customer engagement
The Atlassian Loom Customer Journey
Drivers leading to Loom investment
Interviewee’s Organization
Forrester interviewed a decision-maker who has experience using Atlassian Loom at their company, a global consulting and professional services organization.
Key Challenges
As a global enterprise, the interviewee’s company operated within hybrid work environments and globally distributed teams. This dynamic created a core challenge: strengthening culture and collaboration while maintaining efficiency and profitability across regions and time zones.
Prior to implementing Loom, the organization relied on traditional videoconferencing and unified communication tools. Although effective for real‑time interactions, these tools could not support asynchronous collaboration at scale. As a result, communication inefficiencies had increased as the workforce became more distributed.
Because employee time and expertise directly drive value in professional services, the interviewee emphasized that these inefficiencies had measurable consequences. Specifically, the company struggled with the following challenges:
Meeting fatigue. Managers and individual contributors spent 3 to 4 hours per week in repetitive, synchronous meetings, many of which consisted of low-value status updates.
Information silos. Employees captured knowledge in ephemeral, live meetings, requiring additional meetings or manual recaps for those who could not attend. This limited information flow and slowed organizational response to changing customer needs.
Ineffective text‑based communication. Increased reliance on email and chat reduced meeting volume but proved insufficient for complex explanations, leading to misinterpretation and additional meetings.
Sales and support inefficiencies. Sales outreach and customer communication relied heavily on generic, text‑based communication resulting in low response rates. Resolving detailed sales inquiries and customer issues often required extended email threads or scheduled calls, lengthening sales cycles and resolution times.
Solution Requirements
The consulting and professional services organization sought a solution that could:
Reduce reliance on synchronous meetings without sacrificing collaboration or human connection.
Enhance and personalize communication beyond what text-based tools could provide.
Create persistent knowledge assets from everyday communications.
Accelerate time to productivity for new hires through scalable, consistent onboarding and training.
Differentiate sales engagement in a crowded and competitive market.
“Instead of coordinating large groups ahead of time, we use Loom to walk customers through prepared material before a session. That makes live conversations more focused and more valuable.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Use Case Description
The organization supplements its existing videoconferencing, telephony, and collaboration tools with Loom for simple, immediate video creation. Its employees can begin creating and consuming content with minimal training, leverage Loom’s AI features, and integrate its output with their current Atlassian tools.
The company deploys Loom to 25% of its consulting and professional services employees and customer-facing teams in Year 1, expands to an additional 25% in Year 2, and reaches the remaining 50% in Year 3. Although all licensed users have full access through an enterprise deployment, most users primarily consume Loom content by viewing recorded videos from team leads and those in customer-facing roles. It measures adoption by the number of licensed users and the volume of videos created and consumed.
Analysis Of Benefits
Quantified benefit data
Total Benefits
Ref.
Benefit
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Atr
Increased employee productivity
$405,405
$958,230
$2,211,300
$3,574,935
$2,821,858
Btr
Incremental profit growth
$136,304
$272,609
$545,219
$954,133
$758,841
Ctr
Enhanced employee engagement
$247,518
$495,037
$990,073
$1,732,628
$1,377,994
Dtr
Improved profit due to customer engagement
$888,510
$1,122,561
$1,345,521
$3,356,591
$2,746,382
Total benefits (risk-adjusted)
$1,677,737
$2,848,437
$5,092,113
$9,618,287
$7,705,075
Increased Employee Productivity
Evidence and data. The interviewee reported that, before Loom, employees at their organization spent a substantial amount of time in internal, nonbillable meetings for routine status updates, project coordination, and feedback cycles that did not require real‑time interaction. These meetings were often inefficient and diverted employee time away from higher‑value work. With Loom, the interviewee’s company was able to:
Replace live meetings with video communication. Following deployment, the interviewee’s organization used video communication to replace a portion of its synchronous meetings. The interviewee indicated that shifting routine updates and feedback to recorded video reduced the volume of live meetings and reclaimed employee labor hours that had previously been lost to meeting inefficiencies.
Reduce repeat interactions with reusable content. The interviewee also noted that Loom enabled the creation of durable, reusable knowledge assets that employees could access on demand. Recorded content reduced the need for repeat meetings and follow-up discussions, improving meeting efficiency and overall productivity.
Establish asynchronous collaboration across teams and time zones. In addition, the interviewee observed that Loom improved the effectiveness of their organization’s communication model by supporting asynchronous collaboration across schedules and time zones. Because content could be consumed at any time, employees were less constrained by availability, further reducing reliance on scheduled meetings.
Create flexibility for mobile and remote employees. Finally, the interviewee stated that Loom supported productivity by enabling employees to share updates and feedback from any device and location. This flexibility reduced email volume and minimized dependence on formal, live meetings, particularly for remote and traveling employees.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester makes the following assumptions about the organization:
Twenty‑five percent of the consulting and professional services division’s 4,000 employees are licensed users in Year 1, increasing to 100% by Year 3.
Fifty‑five percent of licensed users consume Loom content in Year 1, growing to 65% in Year 2 and 75% in Year 3.
Employees who consume Loom content spend an average of 3 hours per week in meetings.
Loom enables a 15% reduction in meeting time on average for employees who consume content.
The fully burdened hourly rate for these employees is $70.
Forrester applies a 50% recapture rate, reflecting that not all time savings are redeployed to value‑added work.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors could affect the level of benefit realized:
Adoption may vary across teams and roles, limiting the extent to which organizations can replace meetings.
Employees and teams may adopt asynchronous communication practices at different rates.
Cultural preferences for in‑person discussion may slow the transition to async‑first workflows.
Managers may increase the use of synchronous meetings during critical periods (e.g., product launches), reducing time savings.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted the benefit downward by 10%, resulting in a three‑year, risk‑adjusted total present value (discounted at 10%) of $2.8 million.
27 minutes
Meeting time saved per Loom user per week
“Instead of a 30-minute meeting, I can send a 5-minute Loom. It saves me scheduling time across time zones and cuts filler conversation. Cycle time drops as well, since knowledge is shared immediately.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Increased Employee Productivity
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
A1
Employees with Loom licenses
Interview
1,000
2,000
4,000
A2
Percentage of licensed employees consuming Loom videos
Interview
55%
65%
75%
A3
Average time spent in meetings per week (hours)
Company
3.0
3.0
3.0
A4
Percentage of reduced in-person and redundant meetings
Company
15%
15%
15%
A5
Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee
Company
$70
$70
$70
A6
Productivity recapture rate
Company
50%
50%
50%
At
Increased employee productivity
A1*A2*A3*A4*A5*A6*52
$450,450
$1,064,700
$2,457,000
Risk adjustment
↓10%
Atr
Increased employee productivity (risk-adjusted)
$405,405
$958,230
$2,211,300
Three-year total: $3,574,935
Three-year present value: $2,821,858
Incremental Profit Growth From Faster New Hire Onboarding
Evidence and data. The interviewee reported that their organization used alternative video tools with limited functionality before Loom, which increased administrative effort for trainers and constrained global scale. Live, instructor-led training was costly and difficult to standardize, requiring senior managers to divert time from revenue-generating activities. In addition, they cited a shadowing bottleneck in onboarding before Loom; new hires waited for senior staff to demonstrate processes, which extended ramp time, while experienced employees were pulled from core work to train peers. This dynamic increased onboarding costs and delayed productivity realization. Loom enabled the interviewee’s organization to:
Reduce live trainings. The business agility manager at the consulting company said: “It takes seconds to turn a recorded walkthrough into a document or a work item. That speed wasn’t possible when everything depended on live sessions.”
Accelerate time to productivity with asynchronous training. Postimplementation, their organization used video communication to support onboarding and training. Loom enabled on-demand modules and “evergreen” libraries covering methodologies, software tools, policies, and role-specific processes. The organization reduced repeated live sessions, shortened time to productivity for new hires, and decreased time spent by senior employees on redundant training. The business agility manager indicated that earlier productivity realization was the primary driver of economic value, stating: “The time we save on enablement goes straight back into client priorities. People get back to higher‑value work instead of sitting through repeat explanations.”
Modeling and assumptions. This benefit reflects accelerated time to productivity for new hires and time savings for senior employees involved in onboarding and training activities. Forrester makes the following assumptions:
The organization experiences an average annual employee turnover rate of 12%. Based on this rate, it makes 120 new hires in Year 1, 240 in Year 2, and 480 in Year 3.
Senior employees delivering onboarding training represent one-third of new hires, equivalent to 40 trainers in Year 1, increasing to 80 by Year 3.
Before deploying Loom, each new hire required an average of 120 hours of live, instructor‑led training.
Following implementation, the organization reduces live training time by 30%, or 36 hours per new hire, by replacing a portion of in‑person sessions with recorded Loom modules, while trainers reclaim a comparable amount of time previously spent on repeated live enablement.
The average hourly revenue contribution per employee is $192.
The organization operates with an average net operating margin of 14.5%, which is applied to incremental revenue gains to determine operating profit impact.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that benefit realization may vary across organizations. The following risks could reduce the magnitude of the shortened time‑to‑productivity benefit:
Content freshness requires periodic updates to maintain accuracy and relevance.
Role complexity may vary by department, affecting ramp‑time reduction.
Engagement with self‑paced asynchronous content may vary by new hire.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applies a risk adjustment of 15% to this benefit. After adjustment, the shortened time‑to‑productivity benefit yields a three‑year, risk‑adjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $759,000.
36 hours
Reduction in onboarding time per new hire
“Before Loom, turning a live training into usable material could take 2 to 4 hours. Now, I record and share immediately. Even with light edits, it’s ready in less than 30 minutes.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Incremental Profit Growth
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
B1
New employee hires
A1*C2
120
240
480
B2
Trainers
B1/3
40
80
160
B3
Time spent in live meetings during new hire ramp-up (hours)
Company
120
120
120
B4
Time to productivity improvement with Loom
Interview
30%
30%
30%
B5
Time saved per trainer and new hire (hours)
B3*B4
36
36
36
B6
Average revenue contribution per employee per hour
Company
$192
$192
$192
B7
Net operating margin
Company
14.5%
14.5%
14.5%
Bt
Incremental profit growth
(B1+B2)*B5*B6*B7
$160,358
$320,717
$641,434
Risk adjustment
↓15%
Btr
Incremental profit growth (risk-adjusted)
$136,304
$272,609
$545,219
Three-year total: $954,133
Three-year present value: $758,841
Enhanced Employee Engagement
Evidence and data. The interviewee indicated that employee engagement and retention were ongoing challenges in the consulting and professional services industry, where frequent travel, sustained workloads, and high meeting volumes contributed to burnout and fatigue. They noted that excessive synchronous meetings, particularly for routine updates and coordination, increased cognitive load and could lead to disengagement over time. Loom addressed these challenges at their organization by:
Enabling flexibility and workload control through asynchronous communication. Following implementation, the consulting and professional services organization used Loom to reduce unnecessary live meetings by shifting updates, feedback, and recognition to video communication. The interviewee reported that this flexibility reduced meeting pressure, enabled employees to better manage their schedules, and supported healthier work‑life balance. By allowing employees to consume and respond to information on their own time, Loom reduced back‑to‑back meeting strain and time zone constraints.
Facilitating more personal and authentic internal communication. The interviewee also stated that Loom improved the quality of internal communication at their organization. Managers used recorded video to recognize employee contributions, share updates, and communicate context in a more personal manner than text‑based tools. They emphasized that video messages conveyed tone and intent more effectively than chat or email, helping maintain connection and a sense of belonging across distributed teams.
Leveraging engagement as a contributing factor to retention. Although the interviewee did not attribute retention improvements to Loom alone, they consistently identified improved engagement, flexibility, and communication quality as contributing to employee satisfaction. They indicated that even modest reductions in voluntary attrition could generate meaningful economic impact given the high cost of employee turnover.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
The cost to replace an employee is estimated conservatively at one-third of an employee’s annual salary, comprising recruiting fees, onboarding, training, severance, and lost productivity.
Before Loom, the organization experienced 12% annual voluntary turnover, resulting in approximately 120 departures per year.
Forrester assumes that improvements in employee engagement and work‑life balance supported by Loom reduce the voluntary turnover rate to 11.4%.
This reduction results in approximately six avoided resignations per year in Year 1, increasing as adoption grows in subsequent years.
Avoided resignations multiplied by the estimated cost per departure quantify the annual savings.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that benefit realization may vary across organizations. The following risks could reduce the magnitude of the employee engagement benefit:
Impact may vary by role, geography, and work model (e.g., field‑based versus office‑based employees).
Broader labor‑market conditions may influence voluntary turnover independently of internal collaboration tools.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applies a 15% risk adjustment to this benefit. After adjustment, the enhanced employee engagement benefit yields a three‑year risk‑adjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $1.4 million.
5%
Reduction in employee turnover driven by higher engagement
“Loom removes anxiety for me. I don’t have to stress about taking notes; I can be present in the moment and rely on the transcript and recap.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Enhanced Employee Engagement
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
C1
Average cost to replace an employee
A5*2,080/3
$48,533
$48,533
$48,533
C2
Employee turnover rate before Loom
Interview
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
C3
Employee turnover rate after Loom
C2-(C2*0.05)
11.4%
11.4%
11.4%
C4
Employees retained
A1*(C2-C3)
6
12
24
Ct
Enhanced employee engagement
C1*C4
$291,198
$582,396
$1,164,792
Risk adjustment
↓15%
Ctr
Enhanced employee engagement (risk-adjusted)
$247,518
$495,037
$990,073
Three-year total: $1,732,628
Three-year present value: $1,377,994
Improved Profit Due To Customer Engagement
Evidence and data. Before Loom, sales outreach and proposals relied primarily on text‑based communication, which the interviewee indicated was often ignored in crowded inboxes and resulted in limited ongoing engagement. By sending Loom videos, account managers could engage far more customers, improve response rates, and move sales conversations forward more swiftly. Specifically, Loom enabled:
Personalized video that increased prospect attention and response. Following implementation, the interviewee’s company incorporated Loom videos into prospecting, follow‑ups, and proposal communications. Short, personalized video messages increased prospect attention and response rates by conveying relevance, intent, and context more clearly than text alone. Loom video thumbnails embedded in outreach emails prompted higher initial engagement, while proposal walkthroughs helped prospects better understand value propositions and next steps. The interviewee mentioned how their account managers used Loom to share information with customers instead of setting up demos. They sent 30‑second or one‑minute Loom video tailored to customers and then picked up the conversations from there.
Sustained engagement that accelerated sales progression. The interviewee noted that Loom reduced the number of interactions required to close a sales transaction. Before Loom, account executives often needed multiple touchpoints to maintain prospect engagement and advance opportunities. With Loom, ongoing engagement improved, enabling prospects to remain active in the pipeline and progress through the sales funnel more efficiently.
Human connection that supported pipeline momentum. The interviewee emphasized that creating a Loom video signaled effort and intention, establishing a more human connection early in the relationship. This increased reciprocity and sustained engagement throughout the evaluation process. Although the interviewee acknowledged that many factors influenced sales outcomes, they consistently attributed improved prospect or customer responsiveness and pipeline momentum in part to Loom‑enabled personalization.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following about the organization:
Forty account executives use Loom in Year 1. The number of account executives using Loom increases to 50 in Year 2 and 60 in Year 3.
Before Loom, each account executive engaged an average of 28 leads per quarter.
Twenty percent of leads remain active in the pipeline without Loom.
Twelve percent of active leads convert to closed sales, with an average transaction value of $85,000.
Outreach and proposals accompanied by Loom videos achieve a 28% ongoing engagement rate.
The close rate for active leads increases to 15% following Loom adoption.
The company’s net operating margin is 14.5%.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that these results may not be representative of all experiences. The following factors may impact this benefit:
Sales performance is influenced by market conditions, product‑market fit, pricing, and individual seller effectiveness.
The quality of personalization and relevance of video messaging can affect engagement and conversion results.
The average number of interactions required to close a deal may fluctuate across customer segments and deal sizes.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applies a 10% risk adjustment to this benefit. After adjustment, the improved customer engagement benefit yields a three‑year, risk‑adjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $2.7 million.
40%
Increase in sales lead engagement
25%
Increase in opportunity close rate
“For deeper technical or product detail, we’ll package Loom videos with supporting content and share them with customers so they can engage at their own pace.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Improved Profit Due To Customer Engagement
Ref.
Metric
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
D1
Account executives using Loom
Interview
40
50
60
D2
Warm leads contact volume per quarter
Interview
28
28
28
D3
Total warm leads
D1*D2*4
4,480
5,600
6,720
D4
Ongoing lead engagement rate before Loom
Interview
20%
20%
20%
D5
Warm leads that remain engaged before Loom
D3*D4
896
1,120
1,344
D6
Close rate before Loom
Interview
12%
12%
12%
D7
Sales closed before Loom
D5*D6
108
134
161
D8
Average revenue per sale
Interview
$85,000
$85,000
$85,000
D9
Total sales revenue before Loom
D7*D8
$9,180,000
$11,390,000
$13,685,000
D10
Ongoing lead engagement rate after Loom
Interview
28%
28%
28%
D11
Warm leads that remain engaged after Loom
D3*D10
1,254
1,568
1,882
D12
Close rate after Loom
Interview
15%
15%
15%
D13
Total sales revenue after Loom
D8*D11*D12
$15,988,500
$19,992,000
$23,995,500
D14
Incremental benefit after Loom
D13-D9
$6,808,500
$8,602,000
$10,310,500
D15
Net operating margin
B7
14.5%
14.5%
14.5%
Dt
Improved profit due to customer engagement
D14*D15
$987,233
$1,247,290
$1,495,023
Risk adjustment
↓10%
Dtr
Improved profit due to customer engagement (risk-adjusted)
$888,510
$1,122,561
$1,345,521
Three-year total: $3,356,591
Three-year present value: $2,746,382
Interview Spotlight
A CEO’s Perspective
The CEO of an IT services organization offered qualitative insights into their experience with Loom to enrich this study. Although these insights did not inform the financial model, they provided another perspective on the platform.
The CEO echoed Loom’s benefits as noted by the business agility manager. Specifically:
Improved employee productivity and reduced time lost to synchronous communication. The interviewee noted that Loom’s asynchronous communication model reduced unnecessary interruptions, allowing employees to communicate more efficiently and with less friction throughout the workday: “Asynchronous communication reduces stress and unease. I can share updates clearly without interrupting people’s day, and they can consume it when it works for them.” One example for added productivity was how engineers recorded Loom responses outlining multiple solution options and their reasoning. Other team members could later review those recordings, align on the decision, and move forward without scheduling additional meetings. The executive explained: “An engineer responded with a Loom outlining options A, B, and C and his reasoning, and when the same questions came up later, I would direct others to watch that Loom and align — without having to reopen the entire discussion.”
Time savings for executives through reduced meeting load. The interviewee noted that Loom helped senior leaders avoid scheduling bottlenecks by enabling effective communication without live meetings, contributing to measurable executive time savings: “One of the challenges of being a CEO today is scheduling. Loom gives me the freedom to communicate effectively without imposing on people. It reduces anxiety and saves time compared to traditional meetings.”
Reduced onboarding and training time for new hires. According to the interviewee, Loom replaced time‑intensive documentation and live training with short, reusable videos, enabling faster ramp‑up and more effective knowledge transfer for new account managers: “New account managers use Loom for upskilling. Instead of lengthy playbooks, they watch short videos, saving hours and improving learning speed.”
Faster sales cycles and higher conversion rates. This CEO explained that Loom directly accelerated buyer engagement and deal velocity by making follow‑up more personal and easier to share across stakeholder groups: “We go from a marketing conversation to sending a personalized Loom follow‑up, and those get forwarded many times internally at the customer, leading to faster engagement and conversions.”
Unquantified Benefits
The business agility manager identified the following additional benefits that provided value to their company but were not quantified in the financial model:
Recorded video created persistent, searchable knowledge across the company. The interviewee described Loom as default‑on, persistent, and queryable — with transcription, summaries, and reuse replacing reliance on individuals and one‑off meetings.Loom videos created for project updates, training, and technical demonstrations became durable, reusable assets. With automated transcription and AI‑generated summaries, this content formed a searchable knowledge repository that reduced dependency on individual experts, accelerated onboarding, and limited redundant work. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services firm explained: “By default, Loom puts the knowledge in a trustable, secure and persistent space. … It’s capturing the knowledge by default and then we can choose what to do with it afterward, leveraging its intelligent-by‑transcription summarization and bookmarking capability.”
Visual communication preserved context across the Atlassian platform. For complex or technical topics, the interviewee reported that text‑based communication was often insufficient. By adding visual context and vocal tone, Loom improved clarity in scenarios such as Jira bug reports, code reviews, and design feedback. This clarity reduced ambiguity, minimized rework, and shortened issue‑resolution cycles — particularly for technical teams working across time zones.
Loom strengthened culture by making leadership communication more personal. In a globally distributed organization, video communication enabled leaders to communicate in a more personal and engaging manner across time zones. The interviewees noted that leadership messages delivered via Loom felt more authentic than mass email communications and supported a sense of connection across the workforce.
“We’ve started a series of interviewing each other on Loom to capture insights. … It goes into the teamwork graph, and then we can use the other Atlassian tools to query it and use that as data input for creating things.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
“With Loom, we can create a persistent, searchable knowledge base. [Our current live meeting tool] tends to be very temporal. … That knowledge is lost quite quickly rather than it being something that adds to your core pool of knowledge. Whereas with Loom … you’re adding to the hive mind as soon as you start using it.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
AI Spotlight
How Loom’s AI Enhances Efficiency Across Everyday Workflows
The interviewee shared how Loom’s AI capabilities enhanced everyday communication workflows by streamlining content creation, consumption, and knowledge sharing. This included:
AI‑powered video optimization and editing. The interviewee reported that Loom’s AI removed filler words, pauses, and unnecessary content automatically, producing shorter, clearer videos without manual editing or rerecording. This reduced the effort required to create shareable content and helped teams communicate more efficiently at scale.
AI transcription, summarization, and navigation. Loom’s AI‑generated transcripts enabled users to search, skim, and jump directly to relevant sections of videos, allowing employees to consume only the information they needed rather than watching full recordings. The interviewee described this as a meaningful time saver compared to traditional meeting recordings.
AI note‑taking and persistent knowledge capture. The interviewee highlighted AI note‑taking and transcription as a way to capture meeting knowledge by default in a secure, persistent format, reducing the risk of information loss. This allowed teams to revisit decisions and context without relying on manual notes or memory.
AI support for accessibility and neurodiversity. AI features such as transcripts, summaries, and flexible consumption formats helped employees with different learning styles and accessibility needs engage with content more effectively. The interviewee noted that this reduced cognitive load and anxiety, particularly for neurodiverse employees, while improving information retention.
AI‑enabled training and enablement efficiency. The interviewee reported that AI significantly reduced the time required to create and distribute training materials by making recorded sessions immediately usable without extensive postproduction. As a result, teams were able to create more enablement content that would otherwise not have been produced.
AI‑assisted personalization and content reuse. The interviewee referenced AI capabilities that supported light personalization and video content reuse, allowing their teams to tailor messages or demos for different audiences without starting from scratch. This helped extend the value of existing content while maintaining efficiency.
Flexibility
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Loom and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Expansion of AI‑enabled documentation workflows. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services organization mentioned that as Loom’s AI capabilities mature, their teams will further leverage recorded video to generate structured documentation (e.g., operating procedures, project briefs, client‑ready status updates) through transcript‑based editing and automated summaries. This could reduce manual documentation effort and increase existing content reuse. The business agility manager said: “Rather than decomposing that training into a script and spending 2 to 4 hours writing it up, now it’s captured and shared. Even if I need to edit it, it will be less than half an hour to get a video and a few bullet points out.”
Extension to client‑facing use cases. The interviewee intends to expand the use of Loom to support additional external use cases in sales enablement and customer success, such as solution walkthroughs embedded within proposals or customer onboarding portals. Using Loom more often in customer‑facing work could help teams engage clients better and rely less on live handoffs. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services organization mentioned how their teams intend to enhance communication with existing customers: “We’ll provide Loom videos to clients after a call and say, ‘For those of you that want to go deeper, here are three Loom videos,’ often together with Confluence content.”
Evolution of asynchronous workflows. Over time, the interviewee said their organization may identify additional opportunities to replace recurring synchronous interactions with video communication as teams become more comfortable with async‑first communication patterns. The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services firm said: “Instead of five town halls to tell people the same update, I expect those teams will prepare one Loom and share it async. I expect that we will also share way more piecemeal, small updates as and when they come up instead of scheduling meetings. That will be a big save.”
“We can provide Loom records of the meeting to the client. Loom is way better at keeping links, chat, and context together so they can consume it later.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Platform Spotlight
Loom As Part Of The Atlassian Teamwork Collection Platform
The business agility manager at the consulting and professional services organization described how it is using Loom as part of the Atlassian Teamwork Collection bundle, alongside Jira, Confluence, and Rovo, to turn conversations into structured, reusable work. They highlighted how Loom helped reduce tool sprawl as part of the broader bundle, enabling asynchronous collaboration at scale and accelerating the flow from insight to action. Rather than adding another point solution, Loom amplified the value of Jira and Confluence by serving as the communication layer that connects knowledge, work management, and AI‑driven reuse.
The business agility manager revealed the following advantages their organization derived from using Loom as part of the Atlassian Teamwork Collection bundle:
Loom is embedded in the Atlassian system of work. “The Atlassian tools are just the way they work. The job isn’t implementing Jira or implementing Loom — we’re using it as a core part of how we work. You’re basically implementing one system — work management, knowledge, and rich communication together — rather than segregated tools.”
Loom acts as an entry point into the Teamwork Collection platform. “Loom is the start of a journey. You create content and it flows into the other tools. It’s really the entry gateway to the Teamwork Collection suite. It’s the easy one where people go, ‘Oh yeah, I can capture my meeting,’ and then that feeds into Confluence and Jira with Rovo.”
Loom turns video into structured knowledge and work. “We can finish a meeting and almost immediately turn it into a document and then turn that into Jira tickets and a work plan for the team. In another scenario, I bring a Loom recording into a Confluence page and then use Rovo to transform it from a record of training into an organizational guide in about 30 seconds.”
Loom connects conversations directly to Jira work items. “We include Loom links directly inside work items in Jira. That works from very tactical execution all the way up to strategic goals. Rather than adding everyone to meetings, people can watch the Loom, comment, and then take action in Jira.”
Analysis Of Costs
Quantified cost data
Total Costs
Ref.
Cost
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Etr
Fees to Atlassian
$0
$91,300
$162,800
$299,200
$553,300
$442,339
Ftr
Total internal costs
$67,375
$274,582
$622,738
$1,395,625
$2,360,320
$1,880,208
Total costs (risk-adjusted)
$67,375
$365,882
$785,538
$1,694,825
$2,913,620
$2,322,547
Fees To Atlassian
Evidence and data. The company licensed Loom through Atlassian’s enterprise ecosystem using user‑based subscriptions, bundled within the Atlassian Teamwork Collection suite alongside Jira, Confluence, and Rovo. Atlassian offers Loom as a standalone product and part of bundled offerings; pricing therefore varies by contract and procurement structure.
This TEI analysis isolates the costs and benefits directly attributable to Loom and does not include value from other components of the Teamwork Collection. For the purposes of this study, per‑user fees are based on Loom being licensed within the Teamwork Collection bundle, with a defined portion of the bundle cost allocated specifically to Loom; contact Atlassian for additional details.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following:
The company adopts sliding scale per-user‑based enterprise subscriptions, with annual prices starting at $83 per user for 1,000 seats in Year 1, $74 per user for 2,000 seats in Year 2, and $68 per user for 4,000 seats in Year 3.
Base subscription fees and standard enterprise support are included in licensing costs. No premium customization or professional services are required to realize the modeled benefits.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that actual costs may vary. The following risks could affect cost outcomes:
Adoption rates may vary across departments, potentially exceeding initial projections and increasing the number of licensed users.
Procurement timing and contract structure (e.g., annual renewals versus multiyear prepayment) may affect discount levels and cash‑flow timing.
The adoption of optional features, such as advanced AI capabilities, could increase per‑user pricing if selected.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester applied a 10% upward risk adjustment to subscription costs. After adjustment, Loom licensing fees represent a three‑year, risk‑adjusted total present value (PV), discounted at 10%, of $442,000.
“As an admin, it was simple; I checked that public links were off, and that was most of the setup.”
Business agility manager, consulting and professional services
Fees To Atlassian
Ref.
Metric
Source
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
E1
Loom users
Interview
1,000
2,000
4,000
E2
Annual Loom license per user
Atlassian
$83
$74
$68
Et
Fees to Atlassian
E1*E2
$83,000
$148,000
$272,000
Risk adjustment
↑10%
Etr
Fees to Atlassian (risk-adjusted)
$0
$91,300
$162,800
$299,200
Three-year total: $553,300
Three-year present value: $442,339
Total Internal Costs
Evidence and data. Internal costs reflect the time required to support Loom adoption and ongoing use across the organization. The interviewee reported costs associated with enablement activities led by managers and team leaders, including the creation of recurring briefings and training content, development and periodic refresh of training libraries, time invested in creating Loom videos, light administration to manage groups and access, and changemanagement efforts during departmental rollouts.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interview, Forrester assumes the following:
Employees complete an average of 1.75 hours of self‑guided training and feature exploration over time.
The fully burdened hourly rate for these employees is $70.
Managers and team leaders serve as the primary Loom content creators, representing one‑fourth of licensed users.
The average Loom video requires approximately 15 minutes to create and send.
Content creators send on average 1.5 Loom videos per week.
Based on time investment and labor rates, the average cost per Loom video is $17.50.
Risks. Forrester recognizes that actual costs may vary. The following risks could affect cost outcomes:
Cultural resistance to new communication practices may require additional coaching or change‑management support.
Training and knowledge content may require periodic refresh and curation to remain accurate and relevant.
Department‑specific requirements (e.g., compliance‑driven documentation in HR or legal teams) could introduce incremental process effort.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $1.9 million.
Total Internal Costs
Ref.
Metric
Source
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
F1
New Loom users
Interview
500
500
1,000
2,000
F2
Average self-guided training and exploration time per Loom user (hours)
Interview
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
F3
Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee
Company
$70
$70
$70
$70
F4
Subtotal: Loom training and exploration
F1*F2*F3
$61,250
$61,250
$122,500
$245,000
F5
Users creating Loom videos
E1/4*A2
138
325
750
F6
Average Loom video creation time (minutes)
Interview
15
15
15
F7
Loom videos created per year
F5*1.5*52
10,764
25,350
58,500
F8
Cost per Loom video created
F3*F6/60
$17.50
$17.50
$17.50
F9
Subtotal: Total cost of creating Loom videos
F7*F8
$188,370
$443,625
$1,023,750
Ft
Total internal costs
F4+F9
$61,250
$249,620
$566,125
$1,268,750
Risk adjustment
↑10%
Ftr
Total internal costs (risk-adjusted)
$67,375
$274,582
$622,738
$1,395,625
Three-year total: $2,360,320
Three-year present value: $1,880,208
Financial Summary
Consolidated Three-Year, Risk-Adjusted Metrics
Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)
[CHART DIV CONTAINER]
Total costsTotal benefitsCumulative net benefitsInitialYear 1Year 2Year 3
Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted)
Initial
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Present Value
Total costs
($67,375)
($365,882)
($785,538)
($1,694,825)
($2,913,620)
($2,322,547)
Total benefits
$0
$1,677,737
$2,848,437
$5,092,113
$9,618,287
$7,705,075
Net benefits
($67,375)
$1,311,855
$2,062,900
$3,397,288
$6,704,668
$5,382,528
ROI
232%
Payback
<6 months
Please Note
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interview, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Loom.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Loom can have on an organization.
Due Diligence
Interviewed two stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Loom.
Interview
Interviewed one decision-maker with experience using Loom at their organization to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Financial Model Framework
Constructed a financial model representative of the interview using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewee.
Case Study
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Total Economic Impact Approach
Benefits
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
Financial Terminology
Present value (PV)
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PVs of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
Net present value (NPV)
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
Return on investment (ROI)
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
Discount rate
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
Payback
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Appendix A
Total Economic Impact
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Appendix B
Endnotes
1Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
[CONTENT]
Disclosures
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by Atlassian and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Loom.
Atlassian reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
Atlassian provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
TEI Consultant:
Casey Quillin
Published
March 2026
The Total Economic Impact™ Of Atlassian Loom
This study is commissioned by Atlassian and delivered by Forrester Consulting.