A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By AWS, May 2025
Enterprises and small- to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) alike are navigating the complexities of software, data, and professional services procurement, and are facing unique challenges based on their scale, resources, and business needs. By leveraging AWS Marketplace, these organizations can streamline their solution discovery, procurement, and deployment processes, reducing implementation expenses. AWS Marketplace helps organizations improve their software, data, and professional services procurement and management with ease and efficiency.
AWS Marketplace is a curated digital storefront that helps companies of all sizes find, try, buy, deploy, and manage software, data, and professional services from AWS Partners. Customers can find and evaluate solutions quickly with access to product details, comparisons, and free trials. Organizations can also save procurement time and costs using standard contracts, flexible pricing models, custom pricing and term negotiations with vendors and consulting partners, and consolidated license and spend management. Global enterprises, SMBs, and public sector organizations use AWS Marketplace to address diverse challenges across different scales, resources, and regions. Regardless of a company’s size, AWS Marketplace provides services for optimizing cloud solution procurement and management processes, allowing organizations to benefit from enhanced efficiency and cost savings.
AWS commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by procuring solutions in AWS Marketplace.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of AWS Marketplace on their organizations.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed decision-makers at global enterprises and surveyed SMB and public sector respondents across different regions and industries with experience using AWS Marketplace. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a multibillion-dollar enterprise organization with 10,000 employees. A Spotlight of the SMB and public sector survey results is included at the end of this case study. The detailed region and industry distribution of the survey respondents is disclosed in Appendix A.
Before adopting AWS Marketplace, organizations procured cloud solutions through various channels, such as direct vendor purchases and managed service providers (MSPs). Limited internal expertise with solution discovery and recommendations often led to extended searches for the right cloud solution. Working with traditional procurement channels including MSPs and individual vendors involved extensive back-and-forth communication, further delaying the purchasing process and deployment.
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
The financial analysis which is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $941,183 over three years versus costs of $197,516, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $743,667 and an ROI of 377%.
Return on investment (ROI):
Benefits PV:
Net present
value (NPV):
Payback:
From the information provided in the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering procuring through AWS Marketplace.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that AWS Marketplace can have on an organization.
Interviewed AWS Marketplace stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to AWS Marketplace.
Interviewed six decision-makers and surveyed 419 respondents at organizations using AWS Marketplace to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by AWS and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in AWS Marketplace.
AWS reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
AWS provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third-party survey partner.
Consulting Team:
Chengcheng Dong
| Role | Industry | Region | Employees | Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procurement excellence lead | IT services | HQ in the US, global operations | 1,800+ | $2 billion |
| Technology procurement manager | IT services | HQ in Australia, global operations | 1,700 | $550 million |
| Cloud FinOps lead | Online food delivery | HQ in the US, global operations | 20,000 | $8.6 billion |
| Head of UK infrastructure and hosting | Utilities | UK | 25,000 | £26 billion |
| Senior manager of vendor sourcing | Financial technology (fintech) | US | 2,200 | $2.4 billion |
| Cloud manager | Financial services | UK | 25,000 | £8 billion |
Forrester interviewed six decision-makers and surveyed 419 respondents about their experiences before and after using AWS Marketplace at their organizations. For more details on these individuals and the organizations they represent, see Appendix B.
Despite a company’s size, software procurement is a time-consuming effort that requires extensive resources and internal coordination across various departments. In their prior environment, enterprises typically relied on traditional procurement processes involving procurement, IT, and legal departments working directly with vendors or MSPs. Interviewees and survey respondents noted common challenges before using AWS Marketplace, including:
To address the challenges of using traditional procurement methods, interviewees began experimenting with AWS Marketplace. They also explored other new procurement methods to achieve the following business outcomes:
Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The multibillion-dollar organization has strong brand recognition, global operations, and a large customer base. It employs 10,000 people and has a procurement team with 10 members. The organization traditionally worked with MSPs and vendors directly to procure software solutions and coordinated internally with legal and IT departments to meet compliance requirements.
Deployment characteristics. The composite organization began procuring software solutions in AWS Marketplace and gradually increased its use. In the first year, it procured 10 solutions, followed by 15 in the second year and 20 in the third year. Besides SaaS solutions, the organization also purchased development tools and big datasets in AWS Marketplace.
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Procurement efficiency | $45,148 | $67,722 | $90,296 | $203,165 | $164,852 |
| Btr | Deployment efficiency | $57,600 | $100,800 | $144,000 | $302,400 | $243,859 |
| Ctr | Customer Benefits from Spending on AWS Marketplace | $80,000 | $97,600 | $115,760 | $293,360 | $240,361 |
| Dtr | Implementation cost savings | $80,000 | $120,000 | $160,000 | $360,000 | $292,111 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $262,748 | $386,122 | $510,056 | $1,158,925 | $941,183 |
Evidence and data. Before using AWS Marketplace, the interviewees’ organizations had mature procurement processes. After an initial trial period with AWS Marketplace, these organizations experienced procurement efficiency gains, including reduced time for solution discovery, contract drafting, procurement processes, and invoice processing.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variations based on several factors that may reduce or slow the recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $165,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Solutions procured via AWS Marketplace | Composite | 10 | 15 | 20 | |
| A2 | Hours spent on solution discovery prior to AWS Marketplace | Interviews | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| A3 | Percentage time savings enabled by AWS Marketplace | Interviews | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| A4 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee involved in vendor search | Composite | $44 | $44 | $44 | |
| A5 | Subtotal: Solution discovery savings enabled by AWS Marketplace | A1*A2*A3*A4 | $6,160 | $9,240 | $12,320 | |
| A6 | Hours saved per transaction on contracting drafting | Interviews | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| A7 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a procurement manager | Composite | $61 | $61 | $61 | |
| A8 | Subtotal: Contract drafting savings enabled by AWS Marketplace | A1*A6*A7 | $4,880 | $7,320 | $9,760 | |
| A9 | Hours spent on procurement processes prior to AWS Marketplace | Interviews | 160 | 160 | 160 | |
| A10 | Percentage time savings enabled by AWS Marketplace | Interviews | 60% | 60% | 60% | |
| A11 | Subtotal: Procurement savings enabled by AWS Marketplace | A1*A9*A10*A7 | $58,560 | $87,840 | $117,120 | |
| A12 | Hours saved per invoice with AWS Marketplace consolidation | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| A13 | Subtotal: Invoice processing savings enabled by AWS Marketplace | A1*A7*A12 | $1,220 | $1,830 | $2,440 | |
| A14 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 75% | 75% | 75% | |
| At | Procurement efficiency | (A5+A8+A11+A13) *A14 | $53,115 | $79,673 | $106,230 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Atr | Procurement efficiency (risk-adjusted) | $45,148 | $67,722 | $90,296 | ||
| Three-year total: $203,165 | Three-year present value: $164,852 | |||||
Evidence and data. After completing necessary procurement processes in their prior environments, interviewees found that deploying software solutions with previous purchase channels was less smooth than expected. However, with AWS Marketplace, organizations experienced improved deployment efficiency.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variations based on several factors that may reduce or slow the recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $244,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | New SaaS solutions deployed using AWS Marketplace | A1*30% | 3 | 5 | 6 | |
| B2 | Days saved on security checks and deployment | Interviews | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| B3 | Development tools/big datasets purchased in AWS Marketplace | Composite | 5 | 10 | 20 | |
| B4 | Days saved between purchase made and tool/data access | Interviews | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| B5 | Total days saved on deployment | B1*B2+B3*B4 | 80 | 140 | 200 | |
| B6 | Average number of senior engineers’ work affected by the solution | Composite | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| B7 | Fully burdened hourly rate of a senior engineer | Composite | $75 | $75 | $75 | |
| B8 | Productivity recapture rate | TEI standard | 30% | 30% | 30% | |
| Bt | Deployment efficiency | B5*B6*B7*8 hours*B8 | $72,000 | $126,000 | $180,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Btr | Deployment efficiency (risk-adjusted) | $57,600 | $100,800 | $144,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $302,400 | Three-year present value: $243,859 | |||||
Evidence and data. AWS customers that spend consistently with AWS may receive additional discounts on their total AWS spending. The head of UK infrastructure and hosting at a utilities organization shared: “One of the big incentives for us was that spend on AWS Marketplace unlocked customer benefits for us. That’s how we first started looking at it. If we buy stuff through AWS Marketplace, not only might we get a great deal, but it’ll also unlock other benefits at AWS. So that was certainly the thing that first got people interested.” Most of the interviewees’ organizations found that spending more money with AWS cloud and AWS Marketplace resulted in more benefits from AWS.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variations based on several factors that may reduce or slow the recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $240,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Total annual AWS spending | Composite | $70,000,000 | $77,000,000 | $84,700,000 | |
| C2 | Total transaction amount through AWS Marketplace (excluding AWS spending) | A1*$300,000 | $3,000,000 | $4,500,000 | $6,000,000 | |
| C3 | Cost savings from AWS benefits | Interviews | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| C4 | Additional enterprise credit on AWS Marketplace spending | Interviews | 1% | 1% | 1% | |
| Ct | Customer Benefits from Spending on AWS Marketplace | C1*C3+C2*C4 | $100,000 | $122,000 | $144,700 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Ctr | Customer Benefits from Spending on AWS Marketplace (risk-adjusted) | $80,000 | $97,600 | $115,760 | ||
| Three-year total: $293,360 | Three-year present value: $240,361 | |||||
Evidence and data. A growing trend at interviewees’ organizations is for internal business units or engineers to prefer a self-serve model over working with certain MSPs when purchasing software solutions. Interviewees reported that their internal teams had gained more knowledge, although MSPs often pushed for extra, unnecessary professional services. The technology procurement manager at an IT service organization shared: “We have clever people here, especially our colleagues who work in the technology space. They tend to not require any hand holding or any professional services when it comes to actually utilizing the software that we purchase. And I noticed for a long time that some of these traditional resellers would often try and sell their managed service solution. … There were a lot of conversations, and they were pushy in that regard … but it wasn’t necessarily fit for purpose here at our organization.” Internal business units or engineers started leveraging AWS Marketplace more since it gave control back to the team and saved professional services costs.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variations based on several factors that may reduce or slow the recognition of this benefit, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $292,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | New SaaS solutions needing third-party implementation support | A1*20% | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| D2 | Average implementation support cost of SaaS solution | Composite | $100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | |
| D3 | Percentage implementation support cost savings with AWS Marketplace and AWS team services | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Dt | Implementation cost savings | D1*D2*D3 | $100,000 | $150,000 | $200,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓20% | |||||
| Dtr | Implementation cost savings (risk-adjusted) | $80,000 | $120,000 | $160,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $360,000 | Three-year present value: $292,111 | |||||
Interviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement AWS Marketplace and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).
SMB and public sector organizations that leveraged AWS Marketplace experienced faster procurement cycles and shorter prepurchase times.
Small and medium businesses (SMBs) and public sector organizations worldwide leverage AWS Marketplace. AWS commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a survey as part of the TEI study to better understand SMB and public sector organizations’ customer journeys and use cases for AWS Marketplace. Forrester collected 419 survey responses, with 40 of these respondents from public sector organizations. This Spotlight will focus on SMB and public sector organizations’ use of AWS Marketplace and its value to their organizations.
The survey respondents’ organizations adopted AWS Marketplace with a variety of business objectives in mind. Their top three motivating factors to adopt AWS Marketplace were faster procurement time (67%), shorter prepurchase time (58%), and cost savings (52%).
Base: 419 IT decision-makers at SMBs and public sector organizations
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, March 2025.
Among public sector organizations, the top business objectives for adopting AWS Marketplace were cost savings (65%), improved procurement time (63%), and improved prepurchase time (50%). Despite minor differences in business objective rankings, the respondents from public sector organizations leveraging AWS Marketplace had similar business objectives as the respondents from SMBs.
Once their organizations began procuring through AWS Marketplace, 72% of respondents reported improved procurement time and 65% experienced cost savings as key benefits of AWS Marketplace.
Base: 419 IT decision-makers at SMBs and public sector organizations
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, March 2025
Similarly the top two realized benefits for the 40 public sector respondents were improved procurement time (75%) and cost savings (73%). AWS Marketplace delivered consistent benefits to users across different industries, regions, and sectors.
Among the 419 survey respondents, 72% reported faster procurement time, making it the highest rated benefit. Survey respondents shared that enhanced contract negotiation features and invoice consolidation drove reduced procurement time. SMBs reported saving an average of 4.6 hours per month (a 44% decrease) on contract drafting and 11.5 hours per month (a 34% decrease) on invoice consolidation by leveraging AWS Marketplace. Despite differences in transaction volumes and procurement practices between SMBs and enterprises, the data consistently highlights the time saving benefits AWS Marketplace delivered to buyers.
On the prepurchase side, SMBs often cited limited resources and expertise, but noted they benefited from AWS Marketplace in finding the right solutions for their use cases. Survey respondents reported a 33% decrease in time spent on solution discovery. The availability of free trials, educational materials, and solution reviews helped SMBs make informed decisions when selecting vendor solutions.
Base: 240 IT decision-makers who selected “shorter prepurchase time” in the previous survey question
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, March 2025
AWS Marketplace delivered time saving benefits for postpurchase tasks, and 40% of organizations reported improved efficiency in deploying and using their procured solutions. SMBs saw their average solution deployment time drop from 71.3 hours to 55.5 hours — a 22% reduction. This deployment efficiency improvement demonstrates how AWS Marketplace helps organizations accelerate their time to value after purchase. Interestingly, the public sector experienced more time savings in another postpurchase activity: obtaining the necessary support to use and manage procured solutions. Out of 40 public sector respondents, 13 reported a 38% decrease in time spent on obtaining support and managing solutions with AWS Marketplace, compared to a 27% decrease among all respondents. This finding underscores AWS Marketplace’s particular value for the public sector in driving efficiency and resource optimization.
Base: 165 IT decision-makers who selected “shorter post-purchase time” in the survey question, “Since adopting AWS Marketplace, which of the following benefits have you experienced” for all respondents, and 13 IT decision-makers at public sector who selected “shorter postpurchase time” in the survey question, “Since adopting AWS Marketplace, which of the following benefits have you experienced” for public sector respondents
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, March 2025
Sixty-five percent of survey respondents at SMBs and public sector organizations reported cost savings with AWS Marketplace. When discussing detailed cost savings, more than 70% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the free trials available in AWS Marketplace (77%) and the flexible pricing options (70%) contributed to their savings. Additionally, respondents identified vendor spending consolidation across departments and private offers through AWS Marketplace as significant cost saving categories. Detailed savings are listed in the table below.
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, March 2025
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etr | Adoption and training | $94,560 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $94,560 | $94,560 |
| Ftr | Ongoing management | $0 | $41,400 | $41,400 | $41,400 | $124,200 | $102,956 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $94,560 | $41,400 | $41,400 | $41,400 | $218,760 | $197,516 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees stated that their procurement teams collaborated with IT, legal, and other internal business units to manage changes required for new AWS Marketplace procurement processes. To ensure all employees were aware of the new processes, procurement teams often developed training materials, such as one-pagers, to guide impacted team members. The self-directed trainings involved team members reviewing the materials prepared by the procurement team.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may increase this cost, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 20%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $95,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Procurement team members involved in AWS Marketplace planning and change management | Composite | 10 | ||||
| E2 | Time spent performing change management tasks (hours per person) | Interviews | 80 | ||||
| E3 | Fully burdened hourly rate for a procurement team member | Composite | $61 | ||||
| E4 | Employees who need training | Composite | 200 | ||||
| E5 | Hours of training per employee | Interviews | 2 | ||||
| E6 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee | Composite | $75 | ||||
| Et | Adoption and training | E1*E2*E3+E4*E5* E6 | $78,800 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑20% | ||||||
| Etr | Adoption and training (risk-adjusted) | $94,560 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| Three-year total: $94,560 | Three-year present value: $94,560 | ||||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees reported that ongoing AWS Marketplace management was minimal and internal procurement teams could troubleshoot if business units or engineers needed help with AWS Marketplace procurement processes. Occasionally, procurement team members conducted meetings with the AWS team about updates. More often, the AWS team worked with procurement teams to collect feedback on future AWS Marketplace functionality. The cloud FinOps lead at an online food delivery company who was the main point of contact for AWS Marketplace shared that ongoing management equaled 1% of their time.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Risks. The expected financial impact is subject to risks and variation based on several factors that may increase this cost, including:
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $103,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Procurement team members and engineers involved in ongoing management | Composite | 20 | 20 | 20 | ||
| F2 | Time spent on ongoing management (per month) | Interviews | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| F3 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee involved in ongoing management | Composite | $75 | $75 | $75 | ||
| Ft | Ongoing management | F1*F2*F3*12 months | $0 | $36,000 | $36,000 | $36,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↑15% | ||||||
| Ftr | Ongoing management (risk-adjusted) | $0 | $41,400 | $41,400 | $41,400 | ||
| Three-year total: $124,200 | Three-year present value: $102,956 | ||||||
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($94,560) | ($41,400) | ($41,400) | ($41,400) | ($218,760) | ($197,516) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $262,748 | $386,122 | $510,056 | $1,158,925 | $941,183 |
| Net benefits | ($94,560) | $221,348 | $344,722 | $468,656 | $940,165 | $743,667 |
| ROI | 377% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
| OFFICE LOCATION (REGION) | |
|---|---|
| North America | 49% |
| APAC | 26% |
| EMEA | 35% |
| ANNUAL REVENUE | |
|---|---|
| <$1 million | 3% |
| $1 million to $29 million | 12% |
| $30 million to $49 million | 34% |
| $50 million to $99 million | 51% |
| RESPONDENTS’ INDUSTRY | |
|---|---|
| Government | 10% |
| Financial services | 8% |
| Manufacturing | 7% |
| Healthcare | 6% |
| Retail, computers or electronics, software or internet, consumer goods | 5% each |
| Professional services, consulting, hospitality, marketing or advertising, media and entertainment | 4% each |
| Automotive, real estate and construction, transportation logistics, travel, wholesale or distribution | 3% each |
| Agriculture, education, gaming, life sciences, telecommunications, oil or gas | 2% each |
| Power or utility, nonprofit, aerospace | 1% each |
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html