Total Economic Impact
Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Generative AI Solutions Built On AWS With AWS Partners
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY AWS, October 2025
Total Economic Impact
A FORRESTER TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY COMMISSIONED BY AWS, October 2025
Generative AI (generative AI) and agentic AI workflows are rapidly reshaping how organizations operate, compete, and deliver value. Advancements in model capabilities and infrastructure efficiency have accelerated enterprise adoption, yet many organizations still struggle to scale beyond pilots and limited use cases. To achieve measurable business impact and enable long-term transformation, organizations seek generative AI and agentic AI deployments that offer model flexibility, integration with existing data and systems, enterprise-grade security, and access to expert partners who accelerate implementation and success for their specific use cases.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying generative AI solutions on AWS with AWS Partners.1 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of generative AI solutions on AWS with the support of AWS Partners.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed 11 decision-makers and surveyed 321 respondents with experience deploying generative AI use cases using AWS services (e.g., Amazon Bedrock, Amazon SageMaker, Amazon Q) and an AWS Partner. Forrester also conducted five interviews with representatives from AWS Partner organizations.
Throughout this study, “generative AI solutions on AWS” and “generative AI on AWS” refers to the use of AWS services and AWS Partners to build and deploy generative AI use cases. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents and combined the results into a single composite organization, which is an organization with 3,500 employees and revenue of $1 billion per year that builds multiple generative AI use cases on AWS with an AWS Partner.
To implement generative AI solutions (generative AI and agents), organizations turn to AWS services such as Amazon Bedrock and Amazon SageMaker, along with the breadth and specialization of AWS Partners (including those with the Generative AI Competency), for broad model choice, scalability, integrated security and governance, cost efficiency, and expertise needed to deploy and manage generative AI successfully. These capabilities enable organizations to quickly move from pilots to production-ready deployments that drive business transformation and deliver measurable outcomes such as revenue generation, operational efficiency, and cost savings.
This study’s interviews detailed how AWS’s integration with existing data and analytics services, along with its compatibility with organizations’ platforms, further accelerated adoption. For instance, a CIO reported that their healthcare organization leveraged this integrated approach to deploy an intelligent sales assistant that reduced quote generation time by 90% and increased customer coverage from 30% to 90%, generating tens of millions in revenue within the first year. Similarly, a director of cloud infrastructure reported that their financial services company implemented a fraud detection solution that reduced false positives by 90% and achieved 70% time savings for their fraud prevention team.
The interviewees said the role of AWS Partners proved crucial in these successes. Their organizations used partners to help identify feasible use cases, accelerate implementation, provide technical expertise, establish governance frameworks, and support scale-up efforts. For instance, the director of finance and IT at a manufacturing company explained that, with partner support, their organization developed agentic workflows three times faster than traditional projects, automating purchase order processing and achieving a 25% efficiency increase in customer service.
By deploying generative AI solutions on AWS with partner support, the interviewees’ organizations successfully transformed their fragmented pilots into production-ready deployments that delivered substantial business value. For example, the machine learning lead explained that their e-commerce company automated the creation of advertising banners for thousands of niche products, achieving production-ready deployment within three months and generating millions in revenue in the first year.
These successes contributed to the composite organization’s 240% ROI and benefits of $16.5 million over three years, demonstrating how AWS and its partners enabled the interviewees’ organizations to move from limited pilots to production-scale deployments with measurable business impact. Key results from investing in generative AI solutions on AWS include revenue uplift from additional business opportunities, improved customer retention, and more effective marketing campaigns, along with enhanced efficiency and automation across several business units
Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization, which aggregates the experiences of the interviewees and survey respondents, include:
Revenue from additional business opportunities, increasing by 10% for impacted revenue streams. The composite organization deploys generative AI solutions on AWS to generate additional revenue through sales process automation, AI-augmented sales assistance, and advanced analytics. This improves win rates and deal sizes by reducing quotation times, expanding customer coverage, and providing content and insights that empower sales to convey value, negotiate, and build stronger relationships. Additionally, AI-powered platform enhancements boost conversions, while analytics connect disparate data for better organizationwide sales strategy. New revenue streams result from multilingual content expansion and tailored analytics offerings that unlock new customer segments. This incremental revenue totals $72.8 million, which translates into profit worth $6.1 million for the composite organization over three years.
Revenue from improved customer retention as churn reduces by 50%. Implementing generative AI solutions on AWS enables the composite organization to improve customer experience and, in turn, strengthen retention. This drives more insightful customer support and enhances product offerings with personalization and new generative AI-powered features. These efforts improve customer success and satisfaction and reduce churn for key offerings. This retained revenue totals $36.4 million and leads to incremental profit worth $3.2 million for the composite organization over three years.
Revenue from more effective marketing campaigns with a 65% increase in click-through rates and an 85% increase in conversion rates for key campaigns. The composite organization leverages generative AI solutions on AWS and its proprietary data to securely scale highly personalized marketing campaigns that see significantly higher engagement. While improving personalization for major campaigns is the primary use case, another key use case is creating compelling marketing assets, such as ads, emails, and landing pages, and testing and analyzing results to identify top-performing approaches. The uplift in revenue from improved marketing totals $8.0 million and results in profit worth $699,000 for the composite organization over three years.
Enhanced employee efficiency with AI-augmented assistance resulting in 25% time savings for employees realizing this benefit. Deploying generative AI solutions on AWS enables employees across multiple functions to complete tasks faster and focus on higher-value work. Use cases include assistive chatbots, document summarization, tailored analytics, and coding assistance. These capabilities boost productivity and speed for roles in customer support, IT, sales, marketing, legal, and operations by streamlining research, accelerating deliverable creation, and improving customer interactions. The efficiency gains save 385,000 hours and are worth $5.7 million for the composite over three years.
Operational efficiency with process automation saving 36,000 hours across multiple processes. Generative AI on AWS allows the composite organization to eliminate manual work and reduce costs by fully automating processes. Unlike efficiency gains that speed up human work, these automations remove manual steps entirely through intelligent document processing, automated data entry, and multistep agentic workflows. This translates to $780,000 for the composite organization over three years.
Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:
Accelerated time to value. The composite organization realizes measurable business value by leveraging AWS’s model flexibility and integrated services, alongside support from an AWS Partner with domain expertise, to experiment, select the best models, develop effective pilots, and scale securely. With broad access to foundation models through Amazon Bedrock and comprehensive capabilities for customization, training, and deployment through Amazon SageMaker, the composite moves from pilot to production within six months. Accelerated time to value is enabled by AWS Partners, particularly those with the Generative AI Competency, which indicates capabilities proven to deliver business value.
Cost efficiency. Building generative AI solutions on AWS enables the composite organization to balance speed, performance, and cost across diverse use cases. By offering a broad choice of models and suite of services, AWS allows the composite organization to optimize for cost efficiency while scaling securely and maintaining high-performing, enterprisewide deployments.
AWS Partner Network. The composite organization works with an AWS Partner to shape strategy, identify feasible use cases, and develop and implement customized generative AI solutions. In doing so, the partner provides technical expertise, helps establish best practices, and maximizes the value of AWS capabilities. This support accelerates time to value and increases the business impact of generative AI use cases.
Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:
Cost of AWS and AWS Partner. The composite organization pays AWS and its AWS Partner for costs associated with its generative AI use cases. Costs will vary by organization based on a range of parameters, such as the services used, the number of use cases, the scope of implementation, and organization size. These represent the incremental costs associated with generative AI use cases built on AWS with an AWS Partner and total $4.5 million for the composite organization over three years.
Internal labor for implementation and ongoing maintenance. A team of employees at the composite organization spends time assisting with implementation and deployment of the generative AI use cases over the course of six months. Additionally, some time is spent on ongoing maintenance. The internal employee labor related to these efforts costs $369,000 for the composite organization over three years
The financial analysis that is based on the interviews and survey found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $16.5 million over three years versus costs of $4.8 million, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $11.6 million and an ROI of 240%.
Return on investment (ROI)
Benefits PV
Net present value (NPV)
Payback
| Role | Industry | Revenue | Number Of Employees |
|---|---|---|---|
| Machine learning lead | E-commerce | $20 billion | 80,000 |
| Associate director | Communications | $15 billion | 100,000 |
| Head of product analytics | Financial services | $5 billion | — |
| Director of engineering | Food and beverage | $2 billion | 2,500 |
| AI platform lead | Software | $1.5 billion | 5,000 |
| CIO | Healthcare | $1 billion | 5,000 |
| CIO | Public sector | — | 750 |
| Director of cloud infrastructure | Financial services | $100 million | 1,000 |
| Director of product | Professional services | $100 million | 200 |
| Director of finance and IT | Manufacturing | $100 million | 150 |
| CEO | Marketing | $2 million | 10 |
Deploying generative AI use cases on AWS with an AWS Partner was often the first major, enterprisewide generative AI investment at interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations. Prior to adopting AWS, interviewees said their organizations typically relied on fragmented approaches, such as experimentation with individual models or training on local GPUs, and faced the following challenges:
A need to realize business benefits and ROI. Interviewees emphasized that solving business problems and realizing measurable ROI was a primary motivation for deploying generative AI. They sought use cases that could deliver core benefits like productivity gains, cost savings, and revenue generation. The CIO in healthcare said: “We were looking to fundamentally reinvent how we engage with our customers and salesforce through AI. Our goal was to improve operational efficiency, scale personalized experiences, and reduce the growing burden on human teams.”
Maintaining long-term competitiveness and innovation. While clear and immediate ROI was a priority, interviewees also viewed generative AI investment as essential to their long-term technology strategies and sustaining competitive advantage. The CIO in the public sector explained: “There’s an arms race to get going with generative AI. That was a big driver [to invest in generative AI on AWS and our AWS Partner]. And our use case is quite innovative, with the ability to generate revenue and scale much further. … This is a hugely transformative technology.”
Concerns around security, scalability, and performance. Security, privacy, and governance were top priorities for interviewees and survey respondents as they considered their organizations’ use of generative AI. A majority of survey respondents said this motivated their organizations’ investment in AWS, and interviewees highlighted AWS’s strength in these areas regardless of the scale of their use cases.2
A lack of in-house expertise. Most interviewees said their organizations lacked the internal skill sets to build, train, and operationalize generative AI models at scale. This hindered their ability to move from pilot to production in legacy environments. Interviewees said that, in contrast, AWS services and the expertise of their AWS Partners enabled them to succeed.
The machine learning lead in e-commerce elaborated: “We developed some of our own models and trained on our own GPUs. The quality wasn’t good. We were confronted with the decision to continue that or use AWS. We chose AWS. The use of Amazon Bedrock and the whole AWS environment is, of course, superior. … And [our AWS Partner] brings knowledge, expertise, and speed.”
A need for a flexible and comprehensive solution. Interviewees evaluated open-source stacks and other cloud providers but said AWS was differentiated by its broad choice of foundation models, integration with their data, and strong partner network. Several interviewees’ organizations were already using AWS for data and analytics services and identified the seamless integration across services as a key advantage when deploying generative AI use cases on AWS.
The machine learning lead in e-commerce said: “AWS offered us cost efficiency and ease of moving [from pilot] to production. There’s integration with AWS storage infrastructure and analytics. We were familiar with AWS and comfortable using it.”
Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:
Description of composite. The composite organization has 3,500 employees, $1 billion in annual revenue, and multiple product and service lines, both B2B and B2C.
Deployment characteristics. The composite has used AWS for data and other nondata services and deploys generative AI solutions on AWS with an AWS Partner for multiple use cases. The use cases are focused on revenue generation and operational efficiency and implemented over the course of six months. Generative AI built on AWS with an AWS Partner represents the composite’s first major, enterprisewide generative AI investment and includes AWS services such as Amazon SageMaker and Amazon Bedrock.
$1 billion in annual revenue
3,500 employees
Generative AI built on AWS with an AWS Partner is the composite’s first major, enterprisewide generative AI investment
Leverages generative AI for multiple use cases
| Ref. | Benefit | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atr | Revenue from additional business opportunities | $2,040,000 | $2,448,000 | $2,937,600 | $7,425,600 | $6,084,748 |
| Btr | Revenue from improved customer retention | $1,080,000 | $1,296,000 | $1,555,200 | $3,931,200 | $3,221,337 |
| Ctr | Revenue from more effective marketing campaigns | $191,527 | $287,284 | $383,046 | $861,857 | $699,329 |
| Dtr | Enhanced employee efficiency with AI-augmented assistance | $1,872,000 | $2,246,400 | $2,808,000 | $6,926,400 | $5,668,039 |
| Etr | Operational efficiency with process automation | $162,000 | $324,000 | $486,000 | $972,000 | $780,180 |
| Total benefits (risk-adjusted) | $5,345,527 | $6,601,684 | $8,169,846 | $20,117,057 | $16,453,633 |
Evidence and data. Generative AI on AWS enabled the interviewees’ organizations to generate additional revenue through sales process automation, generative AI-augmented sales assistance, and advanced analytics. Interviewees said these capabilities improved win rates and deal sizes by reducing quotation times, expanding customer coverage, and providing content and insights that empowered sales teams to convey value, negotiate, and build stronger relationships. Additionally, AI-powered platform enhancements boosted conversions, while analytics connected disparate data for better organizationwide sales strategy. According to interviewees, these benefits substantially increased revenue by tens of millions of dollars at some of their organizations. Among those interviewees and survey respondents who quantified the impact, affected revenue streams typically increased by about 10%, with multiple organizations seeing 20% increases.
Revenue generation was one of the most common business benefits of implementing generative AI solutions on AWS according to interviewees and survey respondents. In the survey, 69% of respondents reported increased revenue.3 Of these, 54% experienced improvements to existing revenue streams and 45% saw the creation of new revenue streams. These gains were driven by increased lead generation, improved conversion rates, and larger average order values.4
The CIO said their healthcare organization deployed an intelligent sales assistant on AWS that dramatically increased quote speed and customer coverage, resulting in tens of millions of dollars in incremental revenue. The solution categorized inbound customer requests, parsed attachments of various formats, determined buying intent, evaluated inventory, and provided optimal pricing.
The same interviewee noted their organization also deployed an internal, sales-focused chatbot on AWS to help sales tailor messaging and negotiate. This resulted in higher win rates, improved upselling, and increased the sales team’s capacity for client relationship development.
The CIO added: “[By leveraging generative AI solutions on AWS, our salesforce has gained] speed, scale, and precision. We reduced quotation times by over 90%, increased customer coverage from 30% to over 90%, and enabled our salesforce to focus on value and negotiating with clients instead of repetitive tasks.”
The same interviewee noted the importance of their AWS Partner to achieving success: “Our AWS Partner played a key role in shaping the use cases, accelerating development, and deploying generative AI in production. Their expertise helped us unlock the full stack of AWS services and establish a secure, scalable foundation.”
A survey respondent who served as a manager in materials reported substantial revenue gains with generative AI on AWS and explained, “AI-based chatbots [on AWS] are now handling customer inquiries and actively selling additional services.”
The director of finance and IT detailed how their manufacturing organization used generative AI solutions on AWS to analyze customer transcripts and emails to identify new opportunities, which expanded the pipeline and uncovered potential revenue that would have otherwise been missed. These new leads and upselling targets were automatically routed into their organization’s CRM and service platforms.
The revenue-generating use cases at the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations were often centered on empowering sales with content augmented by generative AI. Examples included clearer and more tailored proposals, stronger pitch decks with effective visuals, and optimized bundling recommendations, which all contributed to higher close rates or deal sizes.
Generative AI solutions on AWS were also used to improve websites and platforms at multiple interviewees’ organizations, creating additional revenue streams. For example, the director of engineering said their food and beverage company enhanced search and discovery on its online ordering platform to boost conversions, while machine learning lead noted their e-commerce organization quickly generated visually compelling product pages for thousands of niche items. Several survey respondents said their organizations also expanded with multilingual content.
The director of product reported that their professional services organization incorporated generative AI-powered analytics into its offerings, which delivered richer insights and cost savings for clients. This interviewee explained how this in turn created a stronger value proposition and significantly increased sales opportunities: “Our pipeline has doubled. It has never been bigger. [Our generative AI use case on AWS] has a serious impact with higher-level economic buyers, who also like that we’re leveraging AI at scale.”
Survey respondents also reported net-new revenue that stemmed from their generative AI solutions. For example, a director in energy and utilities said, “[Generative AI on AWS] enabled tailored financial reports [that are] attracting more premium consulting clients.” Additionally, a manager explained that their logistics organization was able to monetize AI dashboards as a new offering.
Beyond sales enablement, generative AI solutions on AWS supported innovation and better strategy at the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations. In the survey, 60% of respondents said this enabled innovation.5 Among them, 57% discovered new customer needs or behaviors and 46% identified new business insights.6
Interviewees described using generative AI-augmented insights and analysis to spot market shifts and accelerate ideation. A survey respondent serving as a manager in the automotive industry added: “The ability to connect disparate thoughts and strategies is mind-blowing. [Investing in generative AI on AWS] has been a game-changing decision for us.”
Interviewees and survey respondents repeatedly highlighted several specific features of AWS — such as easy integration with existing systems, security and governance, scalability, and model flexibility — that allowed their organizations to be successful with their revenue-generating use cases. The machine learning lead in e-commerce added: “We chose AWS because of the model flexibility and the ease of model switching. For an exploratory approach and developing proofs of concept, the flexibility Amazon Bedrock provides is the best.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Total annual revenue is $1 billion, $200 million of which is impacted by additional business opportunities with generative AI on AWS in Year 1. This expands to $240 million in Year 2 and $288 million in Year 3.
This impacted revenue increases by 10% due to additional business opportunities with generative AI on AWS.
The operating margin is 12%.
Increase in revenue due to additional business opportunities with generative AI on AWS
Risks. The benefit of revenue from additional business opportunities will vary based on:
Pursuing achievable use cases. Interviewees and interviewed partner representatives emphasized starting with feasible use cases. Greater complexity can be layered on over time as the organization builds confidence and capability.
Exploring multiple proofs of concept. Interviewees noted the importance of experimentation. An interviewed partner representative recommended experimenting and failing fast (sometimes within an hour) in order to move on to use cases that will succeed.
A focus on business value. Interviewees said that, ultimately, business value motivated their generative AI strategy and maintaining this focus helped ensure long-term success.
Defining business value. Interviewed partner representatives stressed the importance of grounding generative AI initiatives in a clear understanding of what actually constitutes business value, as this can vary by organization.
A culture of innovation. Interviewees and interviewed partner representatives said that embracing innovation and all parties remaining flexible and open to incremental change helped ensure long term success.
Aligning technical and business teams. Interviewees said that collaboration across teams helped accelerate deployment and noted that business user involvement was key to defining success and securing organizationwide buy-in.
Choosing the right model. Interviewees and interviewed partner representatives emphasized selecting models that fit the use case, balancing factors such as speed, cost, and performance.
Refining for scalability. Interviewees and interviewed partner representatives noted the importance of refining models to meet business needs before scaling across the organization.
Additional risks include:
The solutions and processes to drive revenue that are in place prior to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
The size and skill set of the sales team.
Annual revenue and the number of revenue streams.
Operating margin.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $6.1 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Total revenue | Composite | $1,000,000,000 | $1,000,000,000 | $1,000,000,000 | |
| A2 | Revenue impacted by additional opportunities with generative AI on AWS | Composite | $200,000,000 | $240,000,000 | $288,000,000 | |
| A3 | Percentage increase in revenue due to additional business opportunities with generative AI on AWS | Interviews | 10% | 10% | 10% | |
| A4 | Additional revenue with generative AI on AWS | A2*A3 | $20,000,000 | $24,000,000 | $28,800,000 | |
| A5 | Operating margin | Composite | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| At | Revenue from additional business opportunities | A4*A5 | $2,400,000 | $2,880,000 | $3,456,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓15% | |||||
| Atr | Revenue from additional business opportunities (risk-adjusted) | $2,040,000 | $2,448,000 | $2,937,600 | ||
| Three-year total: $7,425,600 | Three-year present value: $6,084,748 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents successfully leveraged generative AI solutions on AWS to improve customer experience and, ultimately, customer retention. Use cases centered on improving products and services through personalization, new generative AI features, and deeper analytics, along with faster and more insightful customer support. Both B2B and B2C segments benefited, and 75% of survey respondents reported improved customer satisfaction.7 Among interviewees who could quantify the impact, customer churn decreased by approximately 50% for affected products and services.
Improving websites and platforms with generative AI-augmented features was a common use case at interviewees’ organizations. For example, the director of engineering in food and beverage said, “Generative AI has the power to help with a good customer experience and enhance features, so users come back again for repeat orders.”
The same interviewee explained that generative AI was built on AWS to improve their organization’s online ordering platform with more personalized results: “We have dedicated personalization and recommendation teams. We went from traditional machine learning to generative AI [in order] to turbocharge these models. … Improving our platform holistically is what we are thinking about as we leverage generative AI.”
The director of product said their professional services organization leveraged generative AI solutions on AWS to process millions of data points daily for thousands of customer assets. This generated detailed recommendations and action plans that saved their customers from costs and business disruptions.
The same interviewee reported a 50% reduction in churn due to generative AI on AWS and added: “[Leveraging generative AI on AWS with an AWS Partner] provides a huge competitive advantage. There’s massive opportunity.”
This interviewee also explained that generative AI-powered analytics provided their customer success team with five times more insights and empowered them to better convey the value current customers have seen: “[By implementing generative AI solutions on AWS], a customer success manager can get ready in 10 minutes instead of 2 hours. Customer insights are readily available and documented for them. They can build the customer relationship instead of spending time on data analysis. … [Our customers are] seeing greater ROI.”
The AI platform lead in software noted the improvements to their offerings with generative AI built on AWS and highlighted the value of AWS’s flexibility and scalability: “Using AI in good ways prevents user churn. There’s extensive use of AI within our products and it’s growing every day. … In our preproduction environment, the model flexibility [with AWS] is a huge benefit. Then in our production environment, the scalability is a huge benefit.”
Interviewees and survey respondents commonly leveraged generative AI solutions on AWS for more effective customer support, which drove retention and increased the probability of repeat business. Examples included customer support automation for speed and consistency, proactive issue detection in customer support transcripts, and interactive customer onboarding to accelerate time to value and reduce early churn.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Total annual revenue is $1 billion, $100 million of which is impacted by improved customer retention with generative AI on AWS in Year 1. This expands to $120 million in Year 2 and $144 million in Year 3.
This impacted revenue increase sees a 50% reduction in customer churn due to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
The operating margin is 12%.
Reduction in churn due to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS
Risks. The benefit of revenue from improved customer retention will vary based on:
The solutions and processes to retain customers that are in place prior to generative AI on AWS.
The size and skill set of internal teams, such as sales and customer success.
Annual revenue and the number of products and services.
Churn rate prior to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
Operating margin.
The scope of the generative AI on AWS deployment.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $3.2 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Total revenue | Composite | $1,000,000,000 | $1,000,000,000 | $1,000,000,000 | |
| B2 | Revenue impacted due to improved customer retention with generative AI on AWS | Composite | $100,000,000 | $120,000,000 | $144,000,000 | |
| B3 | Churn rate prior to generative AI on AWS | Composite | 20% | 20% | 20% | |
| B4 | Revenue lost to churn prior to generative AI on AWS | B2*B3 | $20,000,000 | $24,000,000 | $28,800,000 | |
| B5 | Reduction in churn due to generative AI on AWS | Interviews | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| B6 | Revenue retained due to generative AI on AWS | B4*B5 | $10,000,000 | $12,000,000 | $14,400,000 | |
| B7 | Operating margin | Composite | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| Bt | Revenue from improved customer retention | B6*B7 | $1,200,000 | $1,440,000 | $1,728,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Btr | Revenue from improved customer retention (risk-adjusted) | $1,080,000 | $1,296,000 | $1,555,200 | ||
| Three-year total: $3,931,200 | Three-year present value: $3,221,337 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents reported that B2C marketing campaigns built with generative AI solutions on AWS were more successful than traditional campaigns. Organizations securely leveraged their own data to create campaigns at scale that were more personalized and engaging. Many also automated the creation of emails, ads, and landing pages to reduce costs and deliver timely, high-performing campaigns, while others used generative AI-enhanced analytics to identify top-performing approaches and optimize spend. At interviewees’ organizations, targeted campaigns built on AWS with an AWS Partner saw up to 65% improvement in click-through rates and 85% improvement in conversion rates.
The CIO reported that their public sector organization leveraged generative AI solutions on AWS to create a highly personalized email fundraising campaign using its proprietary data that saw double digit improvements to open, click-through, and conversion rates. The interviewee also noted the importance of their AWS Partner: “We didn’t have the skill set internally, but [our AWS Partner] is very knowledgeable and thoughtful and helps us through our AI journey. Everything has been high-quality, and they do the heavy lifting for us.”
The associate director said their communications company launched a marketing campaign with interactive generative AI features that customers themselves could use. This reached a broad audience and successfully targeted specific customer segments, such as younger cohorts.
The associate director added: “[The campaign we created with generative AI solutions on AWS] was great for our company and we won awards. We had very good reach and very good engagement on social media.”
The machine learning lead said their e-commerce company leveraged generative AI solutions on AWS to quickly create compelling ads for thousands of niche, longtail products: “The advertising banners are tailor-made and with no human costs. It was a huge leap and a great success.”
Survey respondents also reported that automated or AI-augmented content (e.g., ads, emails, and landing pages) reduced costs and increased conversions. Respondents often emphasized that the faster execution enabled timely, frequently refreshed campaigns that were more effective. Some of respondents’ organizations also leveraged generative AI solutions on AWS to create impactful localized content for regions lacking high-performing material.
Utilizing generative AI solutions on AWS for enhanced analytics and insights was a common use case across interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations. Some teams applied these capabilities to better understand campaign performance and reallocate budget from underperforming efforts while doubling down on successful ones.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Four marketing campaigns leverage generative AI on AWS in Year 1. This expands to six in Year 2 and eight in Year 3. The composite leverages generative AI on AWS for key, high-visibility campaigns.
The number of messages sent per campaign is 900,000.
The average click-through rate of these campaigns without generative AI on AWS is 6%.
Click-through rates increase by 65% due to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
The average conversion-to-sale rate of these campaigns without implementing generative AI solutions on AWS is 4%.
Conversion to sale rates increase by 85% due to implementation of generative AI solutions on AWS.
Average order value is $100.
Operating margin is 12%.
Increase in click-through rate for key marketing campaigns
Increase in conversion-to-sale rate for key marketing campaigns
Risks. The benefit of revenue from more effective marketing campaigns will vary based on:
The solutions and strategies for marketing prior to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
The size and skill set of the marketing team.
The number of marketing campaigns leveraging generative AI solutions on AWS.
Click-through and conversion rates prior to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
Operating margin.
The scope of the generative AI on AWS deployment.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $699,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Marketing campaigns leveraging generative AI on AWS | Composite | 4 | 6 | 8 | |
| C2 | Messages sent per campaign | Composite | 900,000 | 900,000 | 900,000 | |
| C3 | Average click-through rate for campaigns without generative AI on AWS | Composite | 6% | 6% | 6% | |
| C4 | Increase in click-through rate when leveraging generative AI on AWS | Interviews | 65% | 65% | 65% | |
| C5 | Average click-through rate for campaigns leveraging generative AI on AWS | C3*(1+C4) | 9.90% | 9.90% | 9.90% | |
| C6 | Average conversion rate for campaigns without generative AI on AWS | Composite | 4% | 4% | 4% | |
| C7 | Increase in conversion rate when leveraging generative AI on AWS | Interviews | 85% | 85% | 85% | |
| C8 | Average conversion rate for campaigns leveraging generative AI on AWS | C6*(1+C7) | 7.40% | 7.40% | 7.40% | |
| C9 | Subtotal: Incremental conversions due to more effective marketing with generative AI on AWS (rounded) | (C1*C2*C5*C8)-(C1*C2*C3*C6) | 17,734 | 26,600 | 35,467 | |
| C10 | Average order value | Composite | $100 | $100 | $100 | |
| C11 | Incremental revenue from more effective marketing with generative AI on AWS | C9*C10 | $1,773,400 | $2,660,040 | $3,546,720 | |
| C12 | Operating margin | Composite | 12% | 12% | 12% | |
| Ct | Revenue from more effective marketing campaigns | C11*C12 | $212,808 | $319,205 | $425,606 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Ctr | Revenue from more effective marketing campaigns (risk-adjusted) | $191,527 | $287,284 | $383,046 | ||
| Three-year total: $861,857 | Three-year present value: $699,329 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents reported that generative AI on AWS improved employee efficiency across multiple roles and departments. Impacted employees typically saw time savings of 25%, with some realizing as much as 70% time savings. These gains were driven by a range of use cases, including assistive chatbots, content summarization, fraud detection, and tailored analytics for customer-facing teams.
Sixty-four percent of survey respondents said their organizations improved employee efficiency with generative AI on AWS.8 According to these respondents, the average time savings for impacted employees was 26%.9
Interviewees and survey respondents identified several roles experiencing notable efficiency gains with generative AI on AWS. These varied by organization and deployment strategy, but included data and analytics, customer support, sales, legal, HR, marketing, operations, administrative support, IT, and engineering and software development.
A common use case was assistive chatbots across the workforce, often fine-tuned for specific departments. For example, sales teams used them to generate quotes and improve negotiation tactics, marketers for content creation, educators for qualitative feedback, and customer success teams for robust client insights. The CIO in healthcare reported, “[With AWS and our partner], we easily scaled AI agents to thousands of users across sales, customer experience, and [other] internal teams.”
Additional tasks that interviewees said were streamlined with generative AI on AWS included contract creation and review for legal, onboarding and expense report approvals for HR, querying dashboards and generating insights for business analytics, ticket triage and resolution for customer service, coding assistance for developers, and large-scale document analysis for finance and operations.
The head of product analytics said their financial services organization deployed a generative AI-powered fraud detection solution built on AWS, which reduced false positives by 90% and, in turn, resulted in a 70% time savings for a 20-person team dedicated to fraud prevention. The same organization rolled out a chatbot for its entire workforce to drive broader efficiency gains.
The CIO in healthcare shared that workflows were augmented: “We’ve redesigned several end-to-end workflows [with generative AI on AWS]. For instance, in HR, onboarding and training are now guided [by AI agents]. Integrating company policies, systems navigation, and knowledge base access are all powered by generative AI.”
Multiple interviewees expected efficiency gains to scale to more and more employees over time. The director of finance and IT in manufacturing believed that every employee would see substantial time savings: “There’s been a 25% increase in the efficiency of our customer service team [due to leveraging generative AI solutions on AWS]. And 20% more efficiency for every single department and employee is a conservative goal.”
The same interviewee discussed how employees can now focus on higher-impact business priorities: “That time savings [with generative AI on AWS] can be contributed back to more valuable work. Sales has time for more sales calls, accounting can focus more on cash flow, [and] the warehouse can deal with urgent orders.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews and survey, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
There are 3,500 employees, 200 of which see improved efficiency by leveraging generative AI on AWS in Year 1. This increases to 240 employees in Year 2 and 300 employees in Year 3.
Due to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS, these employees save 25% of their time.
The fully burdened hourly rate for employees is $40.
The productivity recapture rate is 50%. This means employees convert 50% of their time saved to productive time.
Time savings for impacted employees
Risks. The benefit of enhanced employee efficiency with AI-augmented assistance will vary based on:
The number of employees.
Productivity tools in place for employees prior to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
The average fully burdened salary of employees.
The scope of the generative AI on AWS deployment.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $5.7 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Total employees | Composite | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | |
| D2 | Employees with improved efficiency due to leveraging generative AI on AWS | Composite | 200 | 240 | 300 | |
| D3 | Average time saved due to generative AI on AWS | Interviews | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| D4 | Hours saved due to generative AI on AWS | D2*D3*2080 | 104,000 | 124,800 | 156,000 | |
| D5 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee | Composite | $40 | $40 | $40 | |
| D6 | Productivity recapture | TEI standard | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Dt | Enhanced employee efficiency with AI-augmented assistance | D4*D5*D6 | $2,080,000 | $2,496,000 | $3,120,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Dtr | Enhanced employee efficiency with AI-augmented assistance (risk-adjusted) | $1,872,000 | $2,246,400 | $2,808,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $6,926,400 | Three-year present value: $5,668,039 | |||||
Evidence and data. Interviewees and survey respondents reported that, beyond improving employee efficiency, building generative AI solutions on AWS allowed their organizations to fully automate some processes, which eliminated manual work and reduced costs. Unlike efficiency gains that sped up human work, these automations removed manual steps entirely and, in some cases, saved more than 3,000 hours annually per process. Examples included intelligent document processing, data entry and validation, and multistep agentic workflows.
Automation was a common use case among interviewees and survey respondents. In the survey, 76% of respondents reported leveraging generative AI built on AWS for automation, and 79% said generative AI on AWS decreased the cost of doing business.10
Intelligent document processing that removes manual steps completely was a common automation scenario, often saving thousands of hours annually for the interviewees’ organizations. For example, the head of product analytics said their financial services organization automated document analysis for insurance appraisals and the director of finance and IT said their manufacturing business used it to process purchase orders.
The CIO in healthcare added, “Tasks such as classifying incoming customer emails, document summarization, and knowledge search are now fully automated through intelligent agents.”
Some interviewees’ organizations deployed agentic workflows to automate multistep processes, such as purchase order approvals and sales outreach. These workflows connected multiple AI agents — each responsible for a specific task — to enable end-to-end automation.
The director of finance and IT in manufacturing explained that agentic workflows made their generative AI deployment more successful: “Agentic workflows connect agents to job roles. It makes embracing AI more fun and native to our way of thinking about our organization. And that agent leverages another, and it becomes a workflow and the agents become part of our organization.”
The same interviewee noted that their AWS Partner helped their organization identify use cases and develop multiple agentic workflows cost efficiently and at a pace three times faster than traditional projects.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
There are two processes that can be automated with generative AI solutions on AWS in Year 1. This increases to four processes in Year 2 and six processes in Year 3.
Each automated process saves 3,000 manual hours annually.
The fully burdened hourly rate for employees manually completing this work is $30.
Risks. The benefit of operational efficiency with process automation will vary based on:
Automation tools in place prior to implementing generative AI solutions on AWS.
The number of processes that can be automated.
The average fully burdened salary of employees.
The scope of the generative AI on AWS deployment.
Successful deployment of agentic workflows. Interviewees and partner representatives noted the importance of starting with small, easily tractable agentic workflows and layering on top of them over time.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $780,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Processes that can be automated with generative AI on AWS | Interviews | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| E2 | Annual employee hours dedicated to process prior to automation | Composite | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| E3 | Hours saved due to generative AI on AWS | Composite | 6,000 | 12,000 | 18,000 | |
| E4 | Fully burdened hourly rate for an employee | Composite | $30 | $30 | $30 | |
| Et | Operational efficiency with process automation | E1*E2*E4 | $180,000 | $360,000 | $540,000 | |
| Risk adjustment | ↓10% | |||||
| Etr | Operational efficiency with process automation (risk-adjusted) | $162,000 | $324,000 | $486,000 | ||
| Three-year total: $972,000 | Three-year present value: $780,180 | |||||
Interviewees and survey respondents mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:
Accelerated time to value. Interviewees said they leveraged AWS’s model flexibility and integrated services to experiment, select the best models, develop effective pilots, and scale with safeguards in place. Broad access to foundation models through Amazon Bedrock and comprehensive capabilities for customization, training, and deployment through Amazon SageMaker allowed the interviewees’ organizations to move quickly from pilot to production. In the survey, 64% of respondents’ organizations saw measurable business value with generative AI on AWS within six months and 92% saw value within a year.11
Interviewees explained that implementing generative AI solutions on AWS was an ideal choice for large enterprises and startups alike. The director of product in professional services said: “The concentration of all the services in AWS makes time to value easy for us a startup. We don’t have to think about external data pipelines and the security around that.” The CIO in the public sector added, “I think [generative AI on AWS] models and tools are probably the best commercially available, especially for enterprise use cases.”
Cost efficiency. Interviewees said that generative AI on AWS enabled their organizations to balance speed, performance, and cost across diverse use cases. By offering a broad choice of models and services, the interviewees’ organizations could optimize for cost efficiency while scaling securely and maintaining high-performing, enterprisewide deployments. Of survey respondents, 82% agreed that AWS offered cost efficiency.12
AWS Partner Network. Interviewees and survey respondents said their AWS Partners played a key role in developing, implementing, and scaling their customized generative AI use cases. Among survey respondents, 95% characterized their organization’s partner as either “Important,” “Very important,” or “Essential.”13 The machine learning lead in e-commerce said: “Our partners have the expertise to develop the approach we want to take. They first do a proof of concept given our infrastructure, show us the value, and develop from there. Our partner provided broad knowledge and expertise and also speed.”
A majority of survey respondents reported that their AWS Partners guided their organizations in developing best practices (77%), helped identify the most feasible use cases (74%), maximized the value of AWS capabilities (71%), and provided technical expertise (68%) (see Figure 1).
The associate director in communications said: “[Our AWS Partner’s] team was very good, and they refined [so that our content generated by generative AI] was perfect. They trained the tool, and they were very effective and motivated by the project.” The AI platform lead in software added: “Our partner takes a bunch of complexities of distributed training [training AI models across multiple machines] off our plate. They’re very good at supporting us and are considered part of the team.”
Ultimately, AWS Partners helped interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations achieve greater business value. Sixty-four percent of survey respondents reported that their AWS Partners accelerated the time to production, 55% said partners helped optimize costs, and 50% stated partners helped further increase the ROI of their generative AI solutions.15
Base: 321 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025
The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement generative AI built on AWS with an AWS Partner and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:
Generative AI leadership into the future. Interviewees said that given the business impact of their current use cases, their adoption of generative AI on AWS will continue to grow over time; some interviewees said it will likely touch all aspects of their business. They expressed high confidence in AWS’s ability to support future needs, noting their pace of innovation and breadth of services. The director of finance and IT in manufacturing said, “I’m 100% confident in AWS’s ability to meet our needs as generative AI evolves.”
The CEO in marketing added: “We’re constantly learning about new AWS features and services to help us be more efficient, reduce our costs, and improve everything we are doing. They have everything we’re going to need to support our growth.”
Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Total Economic Impact Approach).
| Ref. | Cost | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ftr | Costs of AWS and AWS Partner | $575,000 | $1,725,000 | $1,552,500 | $1,397,250 | $5,249,750 | $4,476,014 |
| Gtr | Internal labor for implementation and ongoing maintenance | $231,000 | $55,440 | $55,440 | $55,440 | $397,320 | $368,871 |
| Total costs (risk-adjusted) | $806,000 | $1,780,440 | $1,607,940 | $1,452,690 | $5,647,070 | $4,844,885 |
Evidence and data. Interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations paid AWS and their AWS Partners for the costs of the services related to their generative AI use cases. These costs represented the incremental costs associated with each organization’s generative AI use cases. Costs varied substantially by organization and were determined by factors such as the services used, the number of use cases, the scope of implementation, and organization size.
The AWS services used to deploy and succeed with generative AI differed across the interviewees’ organizations, but most commonly included Amazon Bedrock and Amazon SageMaker. A subset of interviewees identified net-new services they adopted for their generative AI use cases to succeed, such as AWS Lambda, Amazon CloudWatch, and Amazon DynamoDB.
Interviewees said that AWS had pay-as-you-go infrastructure and efficient token usage models.
Costs of AWS Partners tended to be higher during initial implementation and then decreased once generative AI use cases were successfully deployed. AWS Partners provided the interviewees’ organizations with a variety of services, including strategic guidance and use case identification, technical implementation and solution customization, and support in relation to governance, compliance, and scaling.
Many interviewees’ organizations had a preexisting relationship with AWS, making generative AI on AWS a natural next step. For example, the CIO in the public sector said: “AWS served best for our use case since it holds the entirety of the back-end process when it comes to the data. All of that lives in AWS, so there are synergies based on that. It would’ve been foolish to do this with another platform.”
More generally, interviewees noted that AWS integrated well with existing systems and platforms. The director of finance and IT in manufacturing said, “AWS is appealing because they are very compatible with various platforms and the key links in our ecosystem.”
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
The initial costs of AWS and the AWS Partner are $500,000.
The costs of AWS and the AWS Partner are $1,500,000 in Year 1, $1,350,000 in Year 2, and $1,215,000 in Year 3. The decline in costs reflects less reliance on AWS Partners once use cases are successfully implemented. Use of AWS does increase as the composite sees success and expands workloads, but there is not a per-unit cost increase.
Pricing may vary. Contact AWS for additional details.
Risks. The costs of AWS and AWS Partners will vary based on:
The services used.
The number of generative AI use cases.
Scope of implementation.
Company size.
The preexisting relationship and contracts with AWS.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 15%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $4.5 million.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Cost of AWS and AWS Partner | Interviews | $500,000 | $1,500,000 | $1,350,000 | $1,215,000 |
| Ft | Costs of AWS and AWS Partner | F1 | $500,000 | $1,500,000 | $1,350,000 | $1,215,000 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑15% | |||||
| Ftr | Costs of AWS and AWS Partner (risk-adjusted) | $575,000 | $1,725,000 | $1,552,500 | $1,397,250 | |
| Three-year total: $5,249,750 | Three-year present value: $4,476,014 | |||||
Evidence and data. At interviewees’ organizations, a group of employees dedicated some of their time working with AWS and their AWS Partners to develop, implement, and deploy their generative AI use cases. Moreover, some employees dedicated time to ongoing development and maintenance.
Length of implementations varied from a few weeks to around a year; large-scale implementations typically took around six months.
While AWS Partners played a key role in implementation, internal teams remained involved to ensure alignment with business goals. Interviewees consistently expressed high satisfaction with their AWS and AWS Partner representatives.
Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:
Ten internal FTEs dedicate 50% of their time to the implementation of generative AI solutions on AWS over the course of six months.
After implementation and deployment, three internal FTEs dedicate 20% of their time to ongoing maintenance.
The fully burdened monthly salary for an FTE involved in implementation is $7,000.
Risks. The cost of internal labor for implementation and ongoing maintenance will vary based on:
The number of use cases and the scope of implementation.
The skill set of employees.
The average fully burdened salary of employees.
Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 10%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $369,000.
| Ref. | Metric | Source | Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | FTEs involved in implementation and ongoing maintenance | Interviews | 10 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| G2 | Length of implementation (months) | Interviews | 6 | |||
| G3 | Percentage of FTE time dedicated to generative AI on AWS implementation or maintenance | Interviews | 50% | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| G4 | Fully burdened monthly salary for an FTE involved in implementation and maintenance | Composite | $7,000 | $7,000 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| Gt | Internal labor for implementation and ongoing maintenance |
Initial: G1*G2*G3*G4 Y1 to Y3: G1*G3*G4*12 |
$210,000 | $50,400 | $50,400 | $50,400 |
| Risk adjustment | ↑10% | |||||
| Gtr | Internal labor for implementation and ongoing maintenance (risk-adjusted) | $231,000 | $55,440 | $55,440 | $55,440 | |
| Three-year total: $397,320 | Three-year present value: $368,871 | |||||
| Initial | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total | Present Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total costs | ($806,000) | ($1,780,440) | ($1,607,940) | ($1,452,690) | ($5,647,070) | ($4,844,885) |
| Total benefits | $0 | $5,345,527 | $6,601,684 | $8,169,846 | $20,117,057 | $16,453,633 |
| Net benefits | ($806,000) | $3,565,087 | $4,993,744 | $6,717,156 | $14,469,987 | $11,608,748 |
| ROI | 240% | |||||
| Payback | <6 months |
The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.
These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.
The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.
From the information provided in the interviews and survey, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in generative AI solutions built on AWS with an AWS Partner.
The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact generative AI solutions built on AWS with an AWS Partner can have.
Interviewed AWS stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to generative AI solutions built on AWS with an AWS Partner.
Interviewed eleven decision-makers and surveyed 321 respondents at organizations using generative AI solutions built on AWS with an AWS Partner to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.
Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ and survey respondents’ organizations.
Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews and survey using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees and survey respondents.
Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.
Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.
Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.
Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.
Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”
The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.
The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.
A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.
The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.
The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.
Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
| ROLE | |
|---|---|
| C-level executive | 8% |
| Vice president | 16% |
| Director | 29% |
| Manager | 48% |
| INDUSTRY | |
|---|---|
| Advertising and/or marketing | 5% |
| Agriculture, food, and/or beverage | 4% |
| Automotive | 3% |
| Business or professional services | 5% |
| Chemicals and/or metals | 2% |
| Construction | 4% |
| Consumer product goods and/or manufacturing | 5% |
| Consumer services | 5% |
| Education and/or nonprofit | 3% |
| Electronics | 4% |
| Energy, utilities, and/or waste management | 3% |
| Financial services | 8% |
| Government | 2% |
| Healthcare and life sciences | 7% |
| Technology and/or technology services | 8% |
| Legal services | 2% |
| Manufacturing and materials | 9% |
| Media and/or leisure | 4% |
| Retail | 7% |
| Telecommunications services | 3% |
| Transportation and logistics | 4% |
| Travel and hospitality | 3% |
| ANNUAL REVENUE | |
|---|---|
| More than $5 billion | 2% |
| $1 to $5 billion | 20% |
| $500 to $999 million | 16% |
| $400 to $499 million | 24% |
| $300 to $399 million | 12% |
| $200 to $299 million | 11% |
| $100 to $199 million | 5% |
| $50 to $99 million | 4% |
| $1 to $49 million | 3% |
| Less than $1 million | 2% |
| EMPLOYEES | |
|---|---|
| 20,000 or more | 9% |
| 5,000 to 19,999 | 24% |
| 1,000 to 4,999 | 27% |
| 500 to 999 | 22% |
| 100 to 499 | 12% |
| 2 to 99 | 6% |
AWS Partner Organizations
| Role |
|---|
| CEO |
| CTO |
| CTO |
| AI partnerships manager |
| Global industry director |
1 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.
2 Base: 321 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
3 Ibid.
4 Base: 220 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner whose organization saw increased revenue; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
5 Base: 321 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
6 Base: 267 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner whose organization saw innovation enablement; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025
7 Base: 321 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
8 Base: 321 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
9 Base: 206 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner whose organization saw improved employee efficiency; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
10 Base: 321 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
11 Base: 319 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
12 Base: 321 decision-makers at organizations with generative AI use cases in production running on AWS with an AWS Partner; Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of AWS, August 2025.
13 Ibid.
14 Ibid.
15 Ibid.
Readers should be aware of the following:
This study is commissioned by AWS and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.
Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in generative AI solutions built on AWS with an AWS Partner.
AWS reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.
AWS provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.
Forrester fielded the double-blind survey using a third-party survey partner.
Matthew Carr
October 2025
https://mainstayadvisor.com/go/mainstay/gdpr/policy.html